Any idea how it is now ? <| sep |> Mama Mia . I watched it , then I watched it again in sing along mode . <| sep |> But like , if you don ' t even notice it without the sound , how is that going to change your decisionmaking at all ? Especially considering the fact that Lucio can change it at any moment . <| sep |> Lmaooo shittiest black Friday sale I seen in my life . Everything is pretty much the sameRegular price $ 26 . 95 Black Friday 24 . 95 <| sep |> Single people crave a partner to go through the holidays with . Of course the grass isn ' t always greener . <| sep |> Were you doing the content with a character that had completed that part of the story before ? If not , then that might be the problem . <| sep |> Mainstream economics still stands as an accurate enough option for many situations , such as corporation dealings in competitive markets . Just like how Newtonian physics is still widely used . The problem is that the restrictive utility function theory is used to predict that markets find prices most efficiently . Therefore , we must accept market prices as the best we can do . I disagree if inflation starts running away , we can respond with policies other than passively letting the market dictate prices . Indexation , for example , maintains everyone ' s purchasing power in response to unwanted marketcreated inflation . Newton ' s laws are very different from utility theory utility theory has been shown to fail , Prof . Reddy in the Advanced Microeconomics MOOC says , a third of the time , in experiments . If apples fell up 33 times out of a hundred , Newton ' s laws would not be useful . There ' s nothing in mainstream economics that forbids money creation by anyone . The quantity theory states that prices will rise other things such as velocity held constant . But this is really a normative statement , as is utility theory . You should have a utility function , and your preferences should be transitive , and you should raise prices if the money supply increases . I don ' t want to listen to those instructions . But bank money never reaches the lower parts . It did in the runup to the 2008 crash . It ' s a psychological decision on the part of bank officers . They can lend freely , and stop , at their whim . Right now banks have lots of capital but they choose not to make it available to me . Mainstream economics finds various ways to justify that choice they use utility theory to try to explain what is really simply a psychological choice , an attitude , rather than a law like gravity note also that Newton ' s gravity law is violated on massive scales by galaxies whose outer suns orbit much faster than Newton ' s gravity predicts . I want UBI to put the money directly into the lower partsAgreed . I know mainstream economics needs to move on to better paradigms , but I don ' t think it matters here . I think it matters because it constrains funding to taxation . If you create money to fund basic income , mainstream economics tells us hyperinflation will result , and that is bad because we can ' t and should not do anything about it . I want to challenge that normative statement we can manage hyperinflation if it even occurs through indexation .