I switched him with the wolf Briar right when the sub was redone <| sep |> So when some one else chooses facts from the same source it ' s not correct but when you do it , it is . Of course not , facts are facts whoever references them . Unfortunately for you the facts that you have referenced support my position , not yours . You can ' t twist the meaning to support your agenda and expect people to take you seriously . Here is an example . you quoted the followingIsraeli authorities have told U . S . officials that they found no criminal wrongdoing by soldiers involved in the February killing of an American teenager whom the troops allege tried to stab them , and that Israel will not further pursue the case , POLITICO has learned . All a rational person can determine from that quote is that Israeli authorities have told U . S . officials that they found no criminal wrongdoing by soldiers involved . This is not in any way evidence that there was no criminal wrongdoing by soldiers , that is the point in question . If you have a personal belief that there was no criminal wrongdoing based on your experience or intuition or past actions of other people , thats fine , you are free to believe that , however your belief alone is in no way evidence of anything and you can ' t expect other people to just take your word for it . If that were the case I could just say that I believe the alleged attacker is innocent and you would have to take my word for it . Showing similarity and tactics and timeframe is absolutely evidence against a particular person . It ' s not in any way , if a person is guilty it must be determined by his actions not what you think he might have done because other people have done it . You ' re supporting a terrorist . Again with the fear mongering , this just shows that you know your argument it weak . You on the other hand are supporting fascism by ignoring facts for your witch hunt .