I got in fine . <| sep |> Ohio University and Miami of Ohio are drastically different culturally <| sep |> I ' m sorry to hear that you can ' t be at your parents . Congrats on 6 months tho , that ' s huge . Maybe with time they will trust again . <| sep |> Where are you making $ 60 a month on $ 20 , 000 <| sep |> Which would be odd since it ' s compatible with my old phone G 3 in the same location . <| sep |> I don ' t see how this is disputable unless you thought I said nlogn here . You ' ve been talking about and showing graphs for n log n the entire time . I assumed you made a typo . If you suddenly want to interject than log n grows slower than n , that ' s correct , but it has little to no bearing on 99 % of what you ' ve previously said . And unsurprisingly , there ' s no reason to mention log n here , unless you ' re just continuing to move the goal posts . I ' m not ignoring them . I ' m disagreeing with them . But you provide no evidence that they are incorrect . That ' s effectively the same as ignoring them . Disagreeing with the other side is not ignoring them . I ' m not ignoring you even though I disagree with some things you ' ve said . No , but you ignoring the vast evidence the ' other side ' has is ignoring things , and it doesn ' t make your own argument stronger , it just makes you look as ignorant as the antivaxxers and climate change deniers are . Actually , I just didn ' t think it would matter because I know what the graph would look like and so do you and so does anyone who can punch a few numbers into WolframAlpha . Oh come now . If there were true , you wouldn ' t need to show any graphs , and yet you did . EDIT So , in the interest of fairness , here is the graph you requested surprisingly enough , the graph I ' ve been talking about , that you ' ve been consistently avoiding , clearly demonstrates when I ' ve been saying n log n is quite different from n . This graph makes nlogn look closer to n 2 than to n , which is obviously not the case . According to you maybe . But we can see clearly in this graph that n log n is clearly not ' almost n ' as you ' ve been saying . I ' m not attempting to spread misinformation . I ' m trying to have a discussion and clarify what I ' m saying . Oh come now . If that were true , you would have showed the good graph to begin with . And if that were true , you wouldn ' t be backpedaling now and claiming it ' s just that n log n is closer to n than to n 2 instead of your original claim to the effect of n log n is almost n . I ' m not trying to make them deliberately misleading . But you did deliberately avoid the graph I suggested you post , and we now see that the graph I suggested shows a far , far different picture than the previous ones you posted . It would be ridiculous to think that that was all just coincidence . Very well . I thought I was contributing and perhaps learning if I had made a mistake . I ' ll no longer post to rlearnprogramming . You clearly weren ' t looking to learn if you made a mistake . Otherwise you would have posted the last graph hours ago . Or you would have listened to the many other people in the SO post you linked to , hours ago . If you want to act like the victim to soothe your ego , go right ahead . This is false . For example , I program games . A naive collision detection will be quadratic so even a small number of objects , like 100 , leads to 10000 expensive collision checks . Again , you are misconstruing things and taking things out of context just to try to look right . You are still obviously not trying to learn anything or contribute . In that context , you were claiming things were tiny unless n was massive , so I pointed out that you only needed an input size of 1000 or fewer to see how significant the difference between n and n logn is . If there ' s a significant different between n and n 2 at even smaller values , I covered that by saying ' or fewer ', and it ' s to be expected anyway , since you ' re comparing n with n 2 , not n with n log n . If you understood Big Oh , this would already be apparent to you . So again , yes you should stop posting . I don ' t believe your nonsense , but the newer people might .