Didn ' t he throw the punch before Fedora tried to horse collar him ? <| sep |> Desculpa Vou fazer outra conta e continuar aqui sem esse peso em meu passado . <| sep |> He insurance agent will be since they have to figure out who ' s asphalt . <| sep |> This hasn ' t changed anything . Website admins and owners have literally always been able to change anything . This is a basic fundamental truth of running a website . Making the leap from editing some posts for a poorly thought out joke to framing someone for a crime is a huge one . Why would an admin commit such a crime when they can just eject someone they don ' t like off their site ? For social media sites , you really think other admins or staff would all go along with it ? Moreover , this is so widely known that a law already explicitly exists to deal with this a website owner or staff member is legally responsible for user content they edited , if it happens to be illegal content . And you have zero proof that this is occurring . Millions of websites with user generated content could potentially have this occur . Yet there is not some huge epidemic of a website operators editing content to frame users for crimes . Can you even cite one ? What about many ? It makes no rational sense for a website operator to attempt to frame some random user for a crime when they can just eject then from their site . No , this is not some new startling revelation with huge legal ramifications . This is literally how it has always been and well known with both laws in place to deal with it , and IT concepts surrounding it look up nonrepudiation . It ' s only a surprise to those blissfully ignorant of how running a website works