Well do you want the Natural Law Party on QT every week ? Of course it should reflect popular support , nomatter how unpopular they are with us as individuals . <| sep |> Is this from the Angel Perverse series ? <| sep |> ikr after all those times as a kid i used that argument and it didnt even work once . <| sep |> The only answer to this question that means anything to the industry is the statistical distribution . I ' m having a surprisingly hard time finding a more uptodate version of this graphmbusagepercentile . png from this Nielson report 2011 ussmartphonedatausageup 89 ascostpermbgoesdown 46 . html , but you ' ll note the trend a fairly linear creep until the final few percentiles , after which things go way , way up . Companies gonna company , which means maximizing money . It ' s been shown that they still profit up to truly insane data utilizationat least many hundreds of GB , as I recallbut that ' s not maximizing money . You do that by imposing caps at arbitrarily chosen points in the current distribution the model , built by someone akin to an actuary , will come up with something like pissing off your top 7 % of users will produce the most projected revenue over the next three fiscal quarters . It then goes to marketing , who make it flashy and seem consumerfriendly . Rinse and repeat at the board ' s discretion or when the distribution changes beyond a threshold . The thing to remember is that this is always based on demand , not capabilities . If the infrastructure improved a hundredfold overnight , the consumer plans would stay the same until another competitive pressure changed the equations . TlDr you know how diamond supply wasis artificially restricted to maximize profit for a predictable demand ? Companies do the same with cellular data . Same with midEastern oil , at that , with even more aggressive factors added in .