Huh ? This item is terrible <| sep |> A towering 1 , 235 feet ! <| sep |> With this show , never say never ! I can see a situation where Michael dies and Jane and Rafael fall in love again . I really hope it doesn ' t happen though . I personally really enjoy Jane and Rafael as friends they both kind of lost their personalities when they were together romantically , but they have a really good dynamic and banter now . <| sep |> That and the Pentagon , white house , Bohemian grove , just explore everywhere you weren ' t allows before . <| sep |> For real , some of that Freudian type of shit . <| sep |> I ' d ask them ' Can I fly now ? '<| sep |> It is at least on par with BO 3 , which had a fuck ton of bugs itself <| sep |> It is fitting that you feel that way if you ' ve talked to a lot of people who don ' t like him , but I would call for some caution there . You wouldn ' t base your opinion of Hitler on what today ' s thoroughly brainwashed Germans say about him nor would you base your opinion of Stalin on that of many today ' s Russians who praise him . The prison sentence for handsholding certainly seems crazy from today ' s perspective . However , strict separation of genders outside of the family wasn ' t entirely unheard of in Europe even into 20 th century . You ' ve certainly seen some movies fromabout those times . Women would be seriously hurt by losing virginity , especially if it lead to conception . It would severely lower their value as potential wife at best and turn them into a single mother at worst even if the man didn ' t disappear , parents often wouldn ' t allow marriage to a man who seducedtook advantage of her , or isn ' t callous exploiter but lowquality and unable to control his urges . A man alone with a young unmarried girlwoman is assumed to be trying to seduce and have sex with her , which is sort of trying to destroy her life . False positives are an expected price to pay for deterring actual attempts . . I realize that the sixties is pretty late for this kind of ultraconservative standard , but consider that Spain was less developed and therefore more socially conservative than the rest of Europe . Also , Spain just had the worst experience with extreme leftism in Europe outside of Russia , with the mass murder of ideological and class enemies , implementation of communist policies , and a bloody , destructive civil war . Consequently , they took great care to try to prevent future rise of leftism they correctly thought it had biological causes and the repetition of the bloodbath and destruction , including perhaps unnecessarily strict social conservatism . As a sidenote , I would even question whether being unpopular is necessarily a sign of doing a bad job as a rightwinger . One of the core tenets of the right is to do the right thing , instead of the thing one would most like to do at the moment . Fidelity over promiscuity , saving over spending , eating healthy over eating what tastes good , etc . A right wing politician can be expected to be resented , the same way a parent is expected to be for refusing to give a child something he or she wants . Regarding the stunted height , I think someone painted you a misleading picture . I thought perhaps the phenomenon you described was a result of the warpostwar period , but instead I found this garcia . pdf According to army records , average height and weight of people born during Franco ' s rule increased through that whole time actually growing nearly at double the rate of Europe ' s average , but that had more to do with Spain being underdeveloped than anything Franco has done . It says this regarding nutrition Spanish cohorts born during the second half of the twentieth century grew up in a context of relative food security stock and access were met although dietary quality was improvable in an initial stage . Spain overcame structural scarcity during the 1950 s and this was followed by a diversification of foodstuffs during the 1960 s and the 1970 s