Havent heard about that case but just from what you have said I ' m assuming that the trip didn ' t require sex but Const Marron was required to live there . Further , I ' ll assume it was a sex injury which could have happened anywhere whereas these mozzies are frequently found in the Pilbara and people who have grown up there are more tolerant so he wouldn ' t have been at risk in his home in Perth . So just on the brief info and some assumptions , I ' d say I agree it should be denied . But hmm , what if she slipped in the shower at the hotel and hurt herself ? I ' d say that should be covered . So is it that I think usual or necessary activities should be covered , and am I a prude for saying sex is not ? I don ' t know . But my instinct is no . Okay I think I have it . Anything related to the business trip is covered . That includes flights , taxi , showering etc . Anything outside the realms of the purpose of the trip isn ' t covered , so she couldn ' t expect to go base jumping and they would cover any injuries .