Sure , that shouldn ' t be a big deal . Gimme a few . <| sep |> Vivec . I saw it and was like fuck , I ' m so getting lost here <| sep |> That is just sensuous defined <| sep |> Hi , do you still have the HA alolan vulpix ? I would like a Male HA vulpix <| sep |> Where do you live if you dont mind ? <| sep |> s h o u l d b e l i a b l e o n lineanonymousdefamationIn Cubby , Inc v CompuServe Inc , 7 the court found that CompuServe , which provided users with online access to a daily newsletter but did not review its content , was a mere distributor and therefore not liable for false and defamatory statements made in the virtual newsletter . 8 Conversely , in Stratton Oakmont , Inc v Prodigy Services Co , 9 the court held that Prodigy , a bulletin board operator that exercised some editorial control over usergenerated content , was a publisher , and thus could be held liable for defamatory statements made by an anonymous user with respect to a brokerage firm . 10 At least some of the statements about the firm whose story was depicted in the Martin Scorsese film The Wolf of Wall Street were later found to be true . 11 But it was too late for Prodigy . The joint reading of Cubby and Stratton Oakmont created an unwarranted incentive for content providers to avoid moderating online discourse , because moderating content exposed them to the risk of liability . 12