He was just talking about the one pic he had to go on and to be fair it did look a little mean . <| sep |> I don ' t think horses are perfect , I think Cell is perfect . <| sep |> How is being Mexican remotely similar to haveing a personal connection to the plaintiffdefendant ? It ' s not being Mexican , it ' s belonging to a group of people that could conceivably have a strong bias against the defendant . So what kind of person should be allowed to preside over a Trump case ? Are we excluding blacks , Muslims , Hispanics and women , all groups of people with unfavorable attitudes toward Trump ? Who ' s left ? Only white males who like Trump ? No . It ' s plausible to me that Trump doesn ' t have much of a legal leg to stand on with his argument . I ' m arguing that he has an understandable concern that Mexicans may dislike him more than nonMexicans , and as a result a random Mexican judge is likely to be more biased against him to whatever degree than a random nonMexican judge . THIS SAYS NOTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT MEXICAN PEOPLE . IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE REASONABLE ASSUMPTION THAT MEXICAN PEOPLE WILL DISLIKE HIM MORE THAN AVERAGE DUE TO HIS WALL TALK . If I was a defendant for hate crimes against black people , I would be concerned if a black person was my judge , even if I was 100 % innocent and not a bit racist . The fact you can ' t understand this is mindblowing . On the contrary , it was Trump who saw the Mexican and immediately claimed bias . I ' m just calling him out on it . See my point above about being charged with hate crimes against blacks and having a black judge while being 100 % innocent . Calling someone out for make believe shit is insane .