Oh that ' s good to know ! I ' m eventually going to take on custody of my twin brother and hadn ' t thought about that . <| sep |> I ' m pretty sure you lost when a guy called mid 2 <| sep |> Hey , I don ' t have anything to contribute to this because it ' s a bit over my head . But what do you mean vegan coffee , isn ' t coffee some boiling water vegan or have I been screwing this up ? <| sep |> Genuinely unsure if this is sarcasmWell played , sir <| sep |> I knew someone would say this , but in a universe where planet Earth doesn ' t exist I doubt the ground would be called earth . <| sep |> Oh sorry , I messed up with my screens I corrected it , it was an heavy infantery ! <| sep |> Are you not interested ? <| sep |> I agree with your last paragraph but do you think SBs not taking about exceptions will meet and have sex with me if I am unable to provide things we had agreed upon . I would be told by majority to get in touch with them when I can . Let me try again . If my SD is a married man and unable to provide an allowance will I stay with him ? No . Because the allowance was to make up for the fact that I ' m in a dead end relationship that has no possibility of moving forward . By staying with him I ' m giving up the chance at my happily ever after . If my SD is 23 times my age has kids and have no desire to have more and he stops giving me an allowance will I stay with him ? No . Because these are my prime reproductive years and I ' m sacraficing them to be with him . Now if for some reason their situations change and they are now able to give me what the allowance was making up for will I stay with them without an allowance ? Yes . I would because the money was to make up for a sacrifice or exception I wouldn ' t have to make in a traditional relationship . If I no longer have to make that sacrifice the allowance is no longer necessary . At least for me it isn ' t since I only enter arrangements with guys I genuinely like and would be willing to have be a part of my life long term .