Privileged is misleading , you do not know how those in attendance made their money . In addition , that is the nature of the world , and Canada has the same rules as the rest of the world . <| sep |> How much different would that be from armored Cole ? Just the face model or has his armor changed a lot ? <| sep |> I ' m thankful when the enemy jungler lets me 1 v 1 <| sep |> Meh it ' s Europe . Amateurs at thisEmphasis mine . Well he did kind of did specify . And really the only agency that has been able to put a working mission on the ground on Mars is NASA . The only time someone else got close was when the Soviets landed Mars 3 , which landed beautifully and then immediately failed to work . I think that the ESA would probably as an agency concede that NASA has much more expertise when dealing with landing on a planetary body , followed by the Russians those agencies simply have more missions under their belts doing it which means being able to leverage existing tech infrastructure . That said , the ESA isn ' t incompetent , it just apparently doesn ' t currently have the levels of QAQC present in the American space program . The level of QAQC in NASA is a direct result of various things that have gone wrong in the past in fact the QA program is a direct result of three government engineering failures The total loss of the USS Thresher a nuclear fast attack submarine , destroyed due to probable reactor scram MBT Blow check valve reversal accidental freeze seal , a steam line rupture on the USS Iwo Jima many fatalities , and finally the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger a damn oring . Sometimes you have to make mistakes to learn how to not make them anymore . At Least this time nobody died . If you want to know who to watch coming up in the next couple of decades though , I ' d keep an eye on the Indian space program . The still active MOM mission is crazy impressive , especially considering they did it for 73 million USD .