Wrath of the Lich King launch event ! <| sep |> isnt the air out of your filter bubble poisonous to you ? <| sep |> Managed to score the Phillips 55 4 k after several attempts at checking out . <| sep |> my dreams <| sep |> Thinks they are CPU meetings . He sends Barron instead <| sep |> Oh wow . I had no idea it was that easy . Thanks for your input man . Much appreciated . <| sep |> Firstly , it matters that the accounts were written long after Jesus lived because that calls into question the validity of those accounts , as no writer actually saw the eventsSecondly , there are quite a few contradictions between the gospels , the biggest one that comes to mind being the accounts of judas and how and where he diedThirdly , you say that the story of Lazarus happened in spite of john being the only book to mention it , and that each writer picked why he would include . If each writer picked what did and did not need to be included , then why is the bible the infallible word of god when mere men could change it . Fourthly , you say the other 56 were written atleast 100 years after jesus , but the gospels are fine . The problem is that the gospels were also written between 50 to 100 years after jesus ' deathLastly , you say that stories in the bible are blatantly false only if you start with naturalistic views . My problem with this is that you are saying that these are only false if you look at them through the lens of science , when such things as bats being birds and the mustard seed being the smaller seed are absolutely wrong . I hope to see people refuting my claims here , and just ask that anyone who does keeps things civil and polite , as I only want an open intellectual discussion . Thank you .