It ' s a pain but sanding down a wall and repainting is actually easier than it sounds . <| sep |> What a loon ! <| sep |> Sino may codenames Philippine edition ? Family friendly ba yung words ? <| sep |> i dont know what you been watching cause Flo , Huk , Hexagrams , all great casters that know alot about the game <| sep |> Do you have any other HA or rare ball pokemon ? <| sep |> There is literally no similarities between those situation beside the most basic some people moved from country A to country B . It ' s an example of one civilization being completely destroyed by another , even though the second started as a small , weak group of refugees that might have appeared harmless . The person I was responding to made an argument entirely on the basis that if a group of refugees seems harmless now then they are necessarily harmless forever , and a single counterexample is sufficient to refute him , regardless of any other historical circumstances . If you disagree then you need to explain why the English colonistsNative Americans are not subject to the hypotheses he listed small fraction of the population , refugees fleeing conflict , seeking better life , no military , etc . I ' m sure you won ' t even attempt to do this because you know that they are all applicable . Welcome to cognitive dissonance . Native Americans were decimated mostly by disease , that ' s first point . Not all Native Americans were killed by disease , but there is no Native American civilization left today . What happened to the rest ? Anyway , Europe would have conquered all of them anyway , even if none died of disease . So this is irrelevant . Europeans would probably colonize America regardless of Natives reaction simply because they wanted more land and had resources to do that . Do you think that Muslims do not also want to colonize the world and establish Dar alIslam ? I suggest you look into what Saudi Arabia is doing and what it says in the Quran .