Farewell , dear rawwcomments 5 e n s s h t h i s i sthelookinormallywakeupto ! You were submitted by uDrLeePHD to raww and you were taken away from us way too early . You achieved a lot in your life . The 187 score will always be remembered . Your 6 comments will miss you dearly . Rest In Peace . Please note that this bot has nothing to do with the deletion of your post . It just detects successful posts that were deleted . <| sep |> They are trying to achieve a new type of fraud . do not let them do as they please . <| sep |> I ' m not sure if they ' re in HD , but Southparkstudios . com has the last couple episodes , and Hulu has the rest . <| sep |> I ' d be happy to cheer loud alongside him and be paid for it too . Go team ! !!<| sep |> That ' s kind of the point of fullframe , thoughto be able to use bigger , better lenses with designs similar to the smaller lenses for APSC . If you replace your 56 mm f 1 . 2 APSC with your 85 mm f 1 . 8 fullframe , you ' re basically getting the same work done for more money . The fullframe camera has an additional stop of resolution or sensitivity , which is canceled out by the fact that the lens is one stop slower . However , the limits of lens design mean that you often end up with the same aperture when you scale . So if you have an f 2 . 8 lens design for fullframe , you would have to redesign it for APSC if you wanted f 2 . 0 . Highend zooms with IS tend to be f 2 . 8 designs no matter what sensor size you have , and this is why . The fullframe version will have marginally better noise performance .