I ' m interested in what the excuse will be for ignoring what he says and does once he is in office . <| sep |> I was in a store once to grab one thing . I wasn ' t in a hurry , so I got in the express lane . Another employee cane up and told me there ' s another lane open over here so I followed her . She took me to the self check out . I was pissed ! I ' d worked an 8 hour shift checking people out I don ' t want to do that on my time too . <| sep |> no one will interfere with those who would interfere with thisSo if someone is killing capitalists , there wouldn ' t be any legal repercussions ? Any responses would be ad hoc ? And that ' s true for all crimes ? If you say that the only source of water in an area is yours , for example , that doesn ' t make it so . People can still take water from said source as they please . So if someone breaks the lock off of my well and takes all of my water , there are no legal repercussions ? This is sounding a lot more like the lay person ' s understanding of anarchy , where there are no rules at all and people can do whatever they like .