Nice facemask smh <| sep |> If it ' s been resized or altered in any way they can ' t take it back . With a watch you can just get the links put back in before returning if needed . Other than that it shouldn ' t be a problem <| sep |> The brightest star in our galaxy helping out the Cowboys star . <| sep |> Oh ok , I ' m just going with what i see to make these accusations <| sep |> So I ' m guessing the sun is going to be this game ' s # WIND . <| sep |> I hope so . If we ' d voted for independence in 2014 , Scotland would now be independent under a written constitution which is important when it comes to protecting rights and freedoms . <| sep |> That is a decent point . I am also fairly confident that the deck is able to adapt . From what it remember CFB stated the Matchup was even to slightly unfavorable , but they also said they didn ' t play the Matchup very much , where SCG said they did some turns because it was fun , but slightly favorable for Twin . But i guess to call the Matchup even is a secure thing and favorable was a stretch of mine . I also don ' t recall it perfectly but I think they said it was even when Twin was on the play and unfavourable for Twin on the Draw . I don ' t remember the Processor Match to be good against Twin though , they were light on both removal and Discard and if memory holds they did well because they had really good matchups versus the decks that were slightly favored against Twin , while Twin was quite even . I guess that also depended how their lists were Constructed and I recall lists with 4 Discard Spells 4 Path Slaughter Pact aswell as being impossible to beat on the fair plan . All in all I didn ' t play the matchup much , but that was what I got from the guy at the store who played more BW Eldrazi back then . While I agree that the official statement is a terrible reasoning , i wouldn ' t go so far to say that they do not know what they are doing . I am not convinced that Twin is needed for Blue decks to succeed , my guess would be the lack of traditional spellbased combo that renders Counterspells worse than Removal . My Hypothesis would be that if decks like Storm or Grishoalbrand were allowed to exist and Goldfish constantly as fast as Infect , Blue would regain a substantial amount of value as it would be able to provide a more meaningful type of answer to these strategies than other colors . We have these combo decks that would usually get beaten up by Countermagic . Decks like Ad Nauseam or Valakut . The counters are bad because the cards are bad . These decks fold more to discard than to countermagicBut that is a different Topic . they do have access to Data from MTGO even more than the things exposed through the API back when MTGGoldfish did the MEtagame Breakdowns . I am convinced that they have the means to do an informed decision and that they ' ll use them . I strongly believe that they have insight we overlook or dismiss because we are involved with our likes , dislikes , hopes and needs for the format as active players . Then they shouldn ' t have written things like that Twin suppreses other blue decks . It was not that it was more that Twin was the only blue deck left to stand after the others succumbed to being attacked from so many different angles . Or arguments that Twin had slightly more Top 8 s which could even have been just variance . It is quite funny when you consider that hands down , the difference in strategic diversity was completely turned over by removing a single card from the pool . I guess that alone says enough about the difficulty in keeping the balance of strategic diversity . Also by the fact that new cards were introduced that helped to make other decks viable that then in turn punished these blue decks even more . But I agree the whole balance is very fickle