that ' s pangender french TOASTER ! ! REEEEE ! ! disclaimer that was a bit of humor , and was not intended to besmirch or malign anyone ' s perceived or identifying gender . it derives from a thing we used to call comedy , which was popular for a very long time , but was sadly strangled to death in the late 90 s , when it was decided that we were all too delicate to continue poking fun at each other and ourselves I ' m sure there were also some who took it too far andor said things not in jest , but intended to actually hurt or malign . We should bring back comedy and make it fun again . <| sep |> Scanf returns number of successful conversions . You need to check this to ensure you are using valid data <| sep |> It sounds like the title is clouded . Not sure how someone could buy it with lis pendens . Because , as far as the law is concerned , it ' s a settled matter . The initial taking was improper but was also so long ago as to render any remedy in equity inequitable to everyone who came after . As such , we ' re stuck with the remedy in law , which is money . The Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that the treaty was violated and awarded the Sioux $ 102 million . So far , the tribe has refused to take receipt of the money , so it instead sits in an interestbearing account that ' s currently worth over $ 1 billionnoto 1 billion 308380 . So , what ' s left then ? As far as the law is concerned , this is a settled matter . Simply giving the land back is a near impossibility that would itself involve taking it from people who sincerely believe it theirs and who would absolutely sue over it . What happens once it gets to a court system that sees this as a settled matter ? It wouldn ' t be a straight res judicata , but that would certainly figure in part into any arguments against any future taking .