There ' s an abandoned hospital in biddo , sketchy fuckin place <| sep |> TRTitor Belfort with a pot belly <| sep |> Bruh , I know how you feel . I wonder if they ' re the kind of people that blame others for their own failures . <| sep |> It ' s a beauty ! <| sep |> Let ' s sign him up . Cut some ST nobody and get him returning kicks exclusively . <| sep |> Brings a new meaning to projectile vomit <| sep |> I think the most useful scouts are the ones that polish their scopes in spawn and go for super long cr 4 zy H 34 dSh 07 z . really helps the team <| sep |> you can still verify that the structure of hashes is appendonly , and Merkle trees work fine even when some subtree is unexplored . How would this allow a future comment to be changed ? Because you ' re supposed to hash the contents of the comment as well . If the comment has been deleted , you can edit the next one and nobody will know because you can claim the contents of the previous comment were arbitrary . I agree with you , but we aren ' t at a point where we can make these things convenient . It would be amazing if we could all have a Yubikey with a private key and where the yubikey would turn into a flash drive that would have a PDF where you could print a backup of your key and store it in your safe . That way all someone would have to do is tap their Yubikey to their phone or insert it in their computer ' s USB port and boom , public keys everywhere , but we aren ' t there yet , and that ' s what makes things impractical . If we could build standards that implemented signingverification and encryptiondecryption in the browser , for example , rather than in the page , we could build much more secure things and that ' s why Signal can be more secure than something that gets served in a browser , but the infrastructure and user education is still incomplete . I work for a Signal competitor and my boss is Phil Zimmermann , so being frustrated at how insecure things are is my daily routine , but saying that you can have security and convenience together is misrepresenting the problem , I think . There are definitely some things that you can ' t do while being secure , e . g . you can ' t have a server processing things i . e . looking at them AND keep those things private .