Yeah , and there goes the money anyway , i wonder if bamus betawi ' s accountability is still reliable . And the twice amount of the last year ' s funding is just quite a lot in my opinion , while i can ' t see any significant contribution from them yet . I wonder if it ' s simply not got publicized ? <| sep |> Tbh , we are becoming the next pats , the second Brady andor bb retires rNFL will treat us like they do the pats because of our maintained success <| sep |> Because the potential for the rash to become something very serious exists it is advised to have it evaluated on an emergent basis . <| sep |> What a clinic <| sep |> While it may not seem like good reporting to try and give every ' point of view ' equal time on air , it is more honest than leaving out details to create a narrative . The audio or video of Trump and Hillary speeches are a sort of fact , but the conclusions and interpretations from the pundits are not . You should consider how political pundits and reporters get grouped together . The after debate discussions were not reporters , but just political pundits . They do no discuss facts so much as they discuss what the facts mean . Now , they may point out facts , but forget other facts and , currently , aren ' t careful about pulling out ALL facts and interpreting as such . It is a fact that alcohol is a poison on your liver . It is also a fact that alcohol causes a level of intoxication respective of content ingested . The measured effects of the intoxication are facts , good and bad . It is a fact that alcohol is very common in domestic abuse , but it is also a fact that alcohol is common in celebrations and recreation . It is the reporter ' s and researchers , to find and collect those facts together so that they can be presented to experts and the public . However , when discussing it effects as a means of justifying action and policymaking , that frequently falls onto pundits and public discussion . A pundit is an ' expert ' who collects the available facts , draws a conclusion , then presents the conclusion to their audience . A science pundit would look at the numbers from a medical study , and draw a conclusion that the tested drug is reasonably safe and very effective , and should be considered for commercial sale to the public . However , not all pundits are honest or fair . You would not fault the science pundit if he was never presented the twoyear report that showed the drug causing heart failure , but you would expect him to reconsider his position lest he be biased . Bias is when the pundit ' s pick and choose , willingly or unknowingly , which facts they use to draw their conclusions . We ' ve all heard of the controversial court cases where an officer kills an unarmed man . The pundits we listen to tell us Wow , I guess police are immune to retribution huh ? Look how corrupt the courts are ? . But other pundits are saying it was justified , the man was on PCP and foaming at the mouth , so it was justified ? Then , a dashcam footage comes out and it shows a man on pcp charge the officer swinging , but collapse 5 feet away , still moving , and is then shot as he kind of crawls at the officer . The pundits were both biased by not presenting the entire story . In reality , collecting all facts and views is extremely difficult and even the most honest and ' impartial ' pundits will still have a level of unintentional and ' honest ' bias . You can usually spot an honest pundit as they are more willing to admit what they don ' t know and will change their interpretations as necessity . As far as global warming , while it is a fact that ocean temp averages are rising , and a fair assumption that rising greenhouse gas levels are weakening the ozone layer , and it is a fact the the ice caps are shrinking , but the effects are only predictions , not facts . These are called models and it is bias and dishonest to call them anything other than what they are . You can point out that ice caps are melting , and it they trust you will agree , but saying that the rise in sea level will destroy New York is only a model , because for all we know the water may end up instead as rain clouds and turn Nevada into a rainforest . We ' re very smart , but we ' re not so smart so as to predict the future . When climate change comes up as a reason to shut down factories and people ' s livelihoods , there is usually resistance to those proposals because they have very negative effects for those people , but are only based on a model that may be just as wrong as every stock market forecast was about the economy .