Of course he is orbiting , waiting like a vulture for his chance . He will try to drive a wedge between you . And she is basking in male attention , obviously , which she does not want you to witness . She is devoting emotional attention which should be yours to other young men . If she cannot be made to see this clearly , dump her . She is playing some kind of game . Women like this generally go on to break your heart . <| sep |> Either Yoda or ObiWan . Yoda because he ' s so knowledgeable and wise and has trained hundreds of Jedi . ObiWan because he ' s a great teacher and so funny <| sep |> Firstly , regardless of the duress under which it signed the Simla agreement , India will keep reminding that all disputes between them are bilateral . They are not going to budge from that . They will , no where do I say they won ' t . No where do I argue India should stop or will stop or need to stop . That was not even my argument . Secondly , it is not like Pakistan has abided by the terms of the agreement in the past . They do not maintain the sanctity of the LoC , otherwise Kargil war would not have happened . Support of militant activities is also an evidence of that . Has literally absolutely nothing to do with what I am even arguing . My argument is about the Simla agreement and why it is baseless from Pakistan ' s point of view and why Pakistan does not abide by it for the last 40 years and refuse to do so . I don ' t recall Pakistan doing that , given the fact that they were the aggressors . Pakistan army didn ' t invade Kashmir . Pakistan army did not even set foot inside Kashmir they flat out refused Jinnah ' s request to go to Kashmir . They were going to send 3 , 500 as a defence force which was the first mandate of UN after both sides agreed to the ceasefire . Both sides agreed to stop fighting but India refused demilitarisation so the plebiscite could not be conducted . UN flat out denounced the aggressor claim and decided to conduct a plebiscite rather than hand over the territory to India . Here are some links for your perusal as proof that they dropped the issue in 2010 . i s s u e l e f t u n m e n t i o n e d i n u n i t e d n a t i o n s a n d k a s h m i r o u t ofunlistofdisputesarticle 886480 . eceYou should read what you post before you cite it as a source . UNMOGIP still exists and UN has already said Simla agreement does not denounce it . If it didn ' t the UNMOGIP would not be functioning anymore . Seriously study the Kashmir dispute please . Normally , if one party opts out the agreement , it the guarantor who has to step in . This is how it works . Yes unlike Simla agreement . IWT ha a guarantor . It is not very easy for India to back out of it or break the treaty like Pakistan has done with the Simla agreement . If India could have it would have already broken the IWT , there is a reason it hasn ' t .