Calm your tits , Jack . Accept the olive branch . <| sep |> Came here to say this . Our phlebotomist pop a heat pack , they don ' t use the exam glove trick , but it ' s the same idea . <| sep |> Well it ' s also key to note it ' s weaker even compared to Apple devices . <| sep |> But in certain circumstances . where there is a high concentration of bodies in the water there is also a higher concentration of shark attacks which has no affect on their rarity ? Did you know a lot of shark attacks happen in shallow waters near resort beaches ? I wonder what the coincidence is . Could it be that more people in an area increases the chance that someone will be bitten ? What was even your original point ? Why bring up the Indianapolis at all ? It is like saying the chances of being in a terrorist attack is very low and saying , The people in 911 might disagree with you . Edit And I would blame the high number of deaths on the inadequate supply of boats and life jackets , not sharks . I can almost guarantee the elements killed more than sharks . Sharks probably killed a few and an unusually high number but it wasn ' t some massive feeding frenzy in which every other man was chomped alive . A few sharks take a bite and decide they don ' t like human but that bite is enough to kill . They aren ' t great at eating us , not enough fat and too much bone . Almost all deaths are due to curiosity bites . Because that is how sharks investigate , with their mouths . Edit 2 Ocean of Fear , a 2007 episode of the Discovery Channel TV documentary series Shark Week , states that the Indianapolis sinking resulted in the most shark attacks on humans in history , and attributes the attacks to the oceanic whitetip shark species . Tiger sharks might have also killed some sailors . The same show attributed most of the deaths on Indianapolis to exposure , salt poisoning and thirst , with the dead being dragged off by sharks .