Well , again , if you believe that ' s the case then do something to change it . Or move somewhere you believe gives you what you hope to find . There ' s no need complaining because the person you wanted didn ' t win . That ' s not what democracy is . <| sep |> I ' m actually really struggling to find a way for Black to lose this in a semibelievable manner . The best I could come up with is this 1 . Be 1 ! The bishop will hold c 7 from the short diagonal for maximum zugzwanginess . 2 . Kd 7 ! But not 2 . Kd 6 ? , blocking the black king ' s march to h 4 and forcing him to draw putting the bishop on the short diagonal isn ' t sufficient to lose . 2 . Ba 5 3 . c 6 Ke 5 ! Activating the king is crucial in order to lose this position on purpose . 4 . Be 6 ! Pushing the pawn immediately would make Black ' s subsequent actions completely nonsensical , so White has no choice but to wait until Black implements his plan of selfdestruction . 4 . Kf 4 5 . Bg 4 Kg 3 6 . Be 6 Kh 4 ! Step two of Black ' s plan is complete he is now not in the square . 7 . Bg 4 Kg 3 8 . c 7 Bxc 7 9 . Kxc 7 Kf 4 or 9 . Kh 4 10 . Kd 6 , and White wins .