if you have these thoughts you might be a little fascist <| sep |> My dog must be circumsized . <| sep |> Duly noted Edit autocorrect . <| sep |> I swear all offensive linemen come into the league looking 30 . <| sep |> Added this in , will play it . <| sep |> I agree , uCMDRSephickLeandros , some should definitely be unlocked via in game achievements . As for more cosmetics , I wouldn ' t mind paying for different font packages for when naming ships comes along . <| sep |> Sorry , ma ' am . I ' m here to grab your pussy whether you let me or not . <| sep |> She ' s been called terms like ' slut ', ' bitch ' and ' bimbo '. If that isn ' t genuine misogyny I ' m not sure what would be . Glad you raised this point , because this is something that I recently realized . Are the insults against Sandra Jansen sexist harassment against women ? No . You might say that obviously it is , but think about it for a second . In this case , we know that the harassment was because of an action switching parties . Not because she was a woman . Now , it ' s true that the specific words of harassment referenced her gender . But does that mean it ' s sexist harassment ? Let ' s say a man switched parties , and then someone on Twitter said that This smalldicked loser couldn ' t hack it in original Party , that ' s why he joined the pathetic idiots in second Party . This insult references his gender , does that mean that it is sexist harassment against men ? No . He is being harassed because he switched parties , not because he ' s a man . Consider that male politicians are far more likely to be harassed than women . But the harassment women receive is much more likely to reference their gender . So a male politician who does something , might get 100 abusive or harassing messages . The vast majority , perhaps 90 , would not reference their gender , and 10 would . Now , let ' s say a female politician does the same thing . Instead of getting 100 abusive messages , she might get 20 . Of those 20 , perhaps 15 of them would reference her gender , and the rest wouldn ' t . So in this case , we can see that the woman is receiving more harassment that references her gender . However , we can also see that out of the 100 people that harassed the man , 80 of them did not harass the woman , even though both politicians did the same thing . In other words , the fact that the male politician was a man was a factor that caused him to receive much more harassment . So in this sense , even though the harassment might not reference his gender , it is in fact sexist harassment against men , because the fact that he is a man caused much of the harassment .