Lul mad and bad <| sep |> Which were also available in the previous generation . <| sep |> it reminds me of whitebeard flag from one piece <| sep |> I ' m curious to know what it would take for posters here to find Avery guilty . I ' m really interested in the test results , but if they come back as likely from 2005 , there shouldn ' t be a theory as to how the blood was planted . It just creates an endless cycle of pedantic conversation . There has to be a point where we ' re wrong . I ' m an innocent , but I ' m reasonable . Some posts here imply the posters view it as impossible for the State to reasonably prove Avery is guilty , because there will always be an excuse for any inculpatory evidence . I want an exoneration , but there ' s a point where he has to be guilty as well . Why don ' t we say if the blood is from 2005 , we move on to something else ?