A You cannot represent the entire trans community with a single character so don ' t try . Making her a person will do more good than making her a symbol . B No , wait , I thought I ' d have more to say . I guess that ' s it . C Oh ! How are you planning on having people know she ' s trans ? I think this is one of the most important elements of including trans people in your work . If you have to explicitly say she ' s trans somewhere just for the sake of letting people know , that ' s going to seem weird . I have no idea what kind of game this is or how it works , though , so I can ' t actually offer advice beyond that . <| sep |> 2016 in a nutshell <| sep |> You only cut your every 4 months ? <| sep |> The Lancet is an extremely well regarded medical journal , which isn ' t to say that bunk science hasn ' t slipped through a few times . In relation to fluoride the paper here merely references one other paper this is not a meta analysis . The other paper was published in Environmental Health Perspectives , and was written by the same author . Two analyses of this paper can be found at i g n o r e f u n d a m e n t a l p r i n c i p l e s o f s c i e n c e i n lancetpaperoptforalarmism and neurotoxicityinthelancet To implicate high fluoride , which they quote as one of the new chemicalsthey quote only one paper this only compares the mean IQs of children in villages with different levels of fluoride , with no allowance made for any other differences , and no actual measurement of fluoride in individual children and comparison with their IQs . This is not good evidence . This seems more like scare mongering than science . A proper meta analysis would take the statistical data from multiple related studies and see if an effect can be found across the studies that wasn ' t present individually . A well done meta analyses is generally stronger than individual papers , as they have more statistical power .