Are your rooms and doors aligned to a grid ? <| sep |> For every action . There is an equal and opposite reaction . I never realized that Newtonian laws apply in real life situations too . <| sep |> I would buy this <| sep |> Is their number 2 day for a number 1 day , or is it number 2 number 2 day ? <| sep |> Send me offer <| sep |> It ' s really common in Korean esports to trash talk before big games . Sadly most western people take it super seriously . <| sep |> Gotta disengage the parking brake first . <| sep |> no man buy <| sep |> The more attempt at distiction , the more they sound the same . In the end they both brought forward cool new tech that benefits everybody , and they both have it more proprietary for own commercial considerations . Are you for real ? How is Nvidia which developed a technology to benefit themselves and the consumer the same as Oculus who are paying developers to keep games exclusive to what ' s essentially a display device ? Are you actually this stupid or do you actually hate Nvidia that much ? Oculus was also major firstmovers of currentgen VR . I don ' t know where will it be if Luckey with help of Carmack did not generate the buzz and excitement back then . And ? They developed their technology , other companies developed their own technology and they ' re actively sabotaging other companies and themselves to try and push them out of the market . Nvidia developed their own technology , AMD developed their own technology , and Nvidia did nothing afterwards , yet they are as bad as Oculus ? Do you lack the intellect to differentiate between those two things ? This is an interesting spin . FreeSync is good for consumers because it is openstandard and adoptable by anybody . Nvidia can and should embrace it , though they don ' t have to . Freesync is not an open standard . Displayport adaptive sync is . Secondly , Nvidia already implements that on laptops . Since I got the pedantic out of the way , they could do it , but they don ' t , therefore they ' re anti consumer isn ' t a valid argument , because you can push that level of logic to any point . They should also make all of their drivers open source and cut all of the prices in half , they should also let all other companies use their patents , otherwise they ' re anticonsumer . Are you claiming consumer entitlement attitude now ? Adaptivesync customers suffer from the platform incompatibility , and Nvidia can easily change that . Ahh , those poor adaptive sync customers , suffering from evil Nvidia who refuses to do anything to ease their suffering . Back in reality , no one is suffering and some people think their purchase of Graphics cards are restricted by the existence of monitors which isn ' t really true because the monitors don ' t actually restrict you to a single vendor . It ' s a miracle we didn ' t have this kind of a controversy with HD 3 D . As for the entitlement , yes . Be entitled , you ' re a goddamn customer . You have the right to demand a company to do things you want . However , just because they don ' t meet your demands , they aren ' t being anticonsumer . There is a FE price premium already set by Nvidia , before retailer markups everything . And you have to buy the Founder ' s Edition ? Did you even read what I wrote ? Again , with demandsupply constraints the users have to pay the extra premium for FE . They should wait , sure , but it is still pricegouging by Nvidia . But they don ' t . They don ' t have to buy the FE . And the price is quite literally there to make people buy the partner coolers because blowers are expensive to manufacture ! In fact , I ' m quite simply repeating what I ' m writing above . So , perhaps go above and read my comments again before replying .