Testing on mobile . Spez Didn ' t work . Probably shouldn ' t have expected it to . <| sep |> The North Face . Can ' t be Hugo Boss , that ' s for Nazis . <| sep |> On sale here tonic . There ' s a big Black FridayCyber Monday deal on all their stuff this weekend , 25 % 60 % off everything ! <| sep |> But I love my bankwankcircle jerks in bounty hunt . <| sep |> Weird . I ' d be interested to hear more if you can pin it down to a specific setting . <| sep |> Welcome , Looking forward to seeing what content you create ! <| sep |> Perhaps aim to get rewards Rodman , HOF defensive and Rebound badges , will be a good addition . <| sep |> thank you , you beautiful thing <| sep |> I am leaning towards just wait until I meet them . Thanks ! <| sep |> I suppose somebody ought to be the arbiter of original intent , in that case . I can certainly see where waging direct war against e . g . al Qaeda might be murky , but it seems to me that an entity which purports to act as a state is a state for the purposes of getting the shit blown out of it . That is the reasoning of coalition , obviously . but I suppose you realize that this sets a dangerous precedent My attack is legal because justice demands that I blow that suckers off the earth . How to decide who is to argue like that ? Putin argues the same . And Kim . With respect to ISIS , is it mostly about airstrikes in Syria ? Because the Iraqis seem perfectly happy to have US support on this one , which seems like it ought to render the whole thing legal , being as ISIS is , I presume , an insurgency within Iraq and Syria for these purposes . It is legal in Iraq because AFAIK Iraq invited the coalition to fight Isis . Syria didn ' t invite the US , which makes US engagement in Syria illegal , at least that seems to be consensus in Europe . Law is complicated .