pretty sure my monitor is 1920 x 1080 . And 60 for everything is preferable . <| sep |> That point has nothing to do with whether or not when they do go to reboot something , they maintain ethnic and gender purity of the original . My point is , when you decide that it ' s more marketable to turn a character into a man or woman or whatever who wasn ' t before , generally that ' s a sign that the original isn ' t being respected . Again , Dr . Strange decided that it was more marketable to turn the Ancient one from a Tibetan man into white woman . They didn ' t do it because she was the best actoractress for the job , they didn ' t do it out of consideration for the source material , they did it strictly for that chinese money . It was a good movie , but that decision , in my opinion , makes the movie not as good as it could have been . I ' d argue that almost every genderracebent character only became that way for marketing purposes , and not based on the merits of the actor himself or herself . Additionally , if the purpose of acting is to portray a character , why cast someone for who it ' d be even harder to channel that character ? Look at Supergirl . Jimmy Olsen ' s actor is a good actor . But he isn ' t playing Jimmy Olsen thatpeople are familiar with , he ' s a totally separate , even polar opposite character . The fact that he ' s black isn ' t as much of an issue outside of the fact that they ' ve written the character and the way he acts makes him completely unbound from the traditional character of Jimmy Olsen . I ' d be just as pissed mildly annoyed if they decided that Black Panther should be played by a white dude , or Luke Cage . I feel the same way about the Ancient One . It ' s not some kind of racism or sexism , I just feel like if you ' re gonna make an adaptation or a reboot , than either follow the source material or just make something unique . Genderracebending isn ' t the issue itself , but a symptom of people not respecting the source material in all regards .