Portland , please ! ? Note I ' m also a biased Northwesterner . <| sep |> Sun glasses with white frames . Bluetooth headset hanging from your ear . <| sep |> still sits 60 % win rateand didnt Dota suppose to balance around the proscene , in that logic shouldnt he get a buff ? <| sep |> This is exactly why the NFL has outlawed celebrations , guys <| sep |> Arms warrior sword Strom ' kar has reaction from trolls everywhere such as troll mobs in old dungeons <| sep |> OP was being extremely sarcastic . You failed to read the sarcasm . <| sep |> the point of not intervening when a lion kills an animal is because the lion is doing nothing wrong . Well we agree he isn ' t morally responsible neither is a violent handicapped person . If animal suffering and lives deserve moral consideration , then the zebra is due moral consideration for the same reasons the murder victim is . We may not be able to help the zebra without hurting the lion so we make a moral compromise no intervention , but we still have a duty to help the zebra if we are able . Say 300 years from now we can make artificial meat effortlessly now we can save the zebra without starving the lion do we have a duty to , or no ? From a human morality stand point , the lion needs to eat to survive , so if we stop the lion from killing we essentially are leaving the lion to starve . And if we stop people with organ failure from murdering other humans for their organs for transplant , we are condemning the person with organ failure to death . But isn ' t that morally correct ? Keep in mind that in this case , we would kill 1 person to save another . With a predator , dozens , hundreds or thousands of prey animals have to die . just for one predator to live . Is that fair ? But I would go back to another point I ' ve made , that the lions don ' t have the same ethical barometer as we do , so is it really unethical for the lion to do so ? I ' m not aware of any moral philosophy that claims a lion can behave unethically . It isn ' t a moral agent .