I should say first of all that I am an avid Lichess user I support them with a monthly donation and play all my games there . I used to use their Training section for tactics , and have done more than 2 , 000 , but I switched to Chess Tempo for tactics in March and have never looked back . I am glad to hear that Lichess is taking steps to improve their puzzles , but in my opinion Chess Tempo is still miles ahead of Lichess and it ' s not even close . I would argue that removing the Good move , but you can do better is not a good thing . By doing this you are severely limiting the diversity of positions you see . Many positions in real games have multiple good moves . now with Lichess tactics you ' ll only ever see positions that have a single winning line , which isn ' t realistic . I also question the utility of the mandated SRS feature for training tactics . I use such an algorithm for learning foreign language vocab , but is it really the best way to improve calculation ? Perhaps pattern recognition ? Lichess still doesn ' t have tagging of tactical motifs , user comments to help understand the tactic , or a number of other features that , in my opinion , put Chess Tempo in a league of its own .