I don ' t but the president should be a role model for the people . If he ' s our new role model for what an American should be I ' m calling heavy girls fatties and dodging taxes for the next 48 <| sep |> We just tell him the muslims destroyed all airports and highways . <| sep |> I second this ! Also , if you see a review for a game you have tried that accurately describes game mechanics and such , make sure you mark it as helpful . Not the stupid joke reviews . Also as a dev , we are indeed glued to reviews . <| sep |> David Lee wtf <| sep |> Edit I ' m going to leave this up because it makes sense to show the path of discourse , but I would like to point out that uconciselyverbose had changed my mind . The invasion of privacy is way too far for this situation , especially considering it could be handled in other less invasive ways . I disagree . Taxation has two functions , revenue generation and behavior modification . The idea behind the behavior modification aspect of taxes is that if things become more expensive , people will be less likely to use them . You can see the second in things like cigarette and soda taxes . Water is a public resource that is increasingly scarce in some areas , so it ' s in the government ' s interest to limit consumption of water so that people have enough to drink . They could increase taxes across the board on water , but this would have a larger effect on the poor than the wealthy , so you ' d be increasing the burden on the poor for something that they can ' t do without , which could lead to serious problems . By only taxing specific uses of the water , they ' re discouraging frivolous use of water to reduce overall use without hurting the poor . I think the only other option would be to outright ban lawn watering . Both would be hard to enforce , so I can ' t really say which would be more effective . It ' s a tough situation with tough solutions .