MAKE ADELAIDE GREAT AGAIN ! <| sep |> Actually if the rules allow it then it is ok to do it hence the entire idea behind rules . If it wasn ' t ok to do in terms of rules there would be a consequence just like killing but there is no consequence . This brings me back to my original point that Riot has a broken ass system when it comes to the challenger scene . Cloud 9 followed the rules and took their free million dollars because they had the resources to do so and once again if you were int he same situation you would do the same thing . <| sep |> Master zen <| sep |> That dog looks stoned <| sep |> HE IS RIGHT to use proc sets in his and your opinion not in mine . That ' s the thing with ethics and morals , they ' re subjective and differ person to person . ZOS know how bad PvP is right now as they addressed proc sets are a working on adjusting them so currently using and promoting proc sets to show them how bad of a decision they made is a fallacy . If Sypher and Feng didn ' t create those builds , there ' d be a lot less proc set builds in the game right now . Obviously theorycrafters and people with a knowledge of sets would be using them but the fanboys who can ' t think up their own builds would still be using the other builds . Feng is about to release a Reactive Templar healer video , a few players on my server have been using this setup since IC and it ' s so blatantly obvious that it ' s the best way to go for a PvP healer I ' ve even previously advised a few people of it on here . However , expect to see a lot more Reactive healers in the coming weeks because again , people don ' t know to create their own builds . Anyway , back to proc sets . Badaverage players are using them because they know it ' s easy mode and makes up for their lack of skill whereas good players are using them to remain superior and in Sypher ' s case because he has a duty to publish the meta builds not create , though , wants views on YouTube videos and wants to maintain his Twitch viewersub count . There ' s no point in falsely attributing some philanthropic reasoning to it when it ' s the complete opposite .