But they are bald ? <| sep |> He ' s the interim champ , how do you promote some one to Conor ' s fan base after being knocked out in 13 seconds ? <| sep |> I shouldn ' t have included another issue . I don ' t like Facebook allowing spoof news sites that exist solely to post clickbait articles that so many of my Facebook friends share without checking the source . but I ' m more annoyed by the fearmongering NASA hiding evidence the Sun is set to explode soon articles than the political sites . I just think it ' s troubling because in both porn and fake news they are censoring and setting up a mechanism to censor . I think most people agree the porn censorship proposal is ridiculous but not many people want to make watching unconventional Internet porn their main cause . Then they tie it to this new law where your entire Internet history is saved forever so if you protest that it sounds like you ' re embarrassed that the government will save your porn history . I don ' t like the idea of the government censoring the news either because I feel that wikileaks would be considered one of those fake news purveyors . All of the things we learned from Snowden , if they had to be approved by the government , would have never come to light . I do agree it ' s very different but both issues are about the government deciding what is good for you . I don ' t believe in making more laws when we already have laws in place such as certain types of porn that are unconventional would also be illegal . But if the acts themselves are legal and the porn is violating no law other than being unconventional , then we ' re just going to waste money and create a government office whose job is to rate and approve porn . Where do I sign up ? haha The deliberate spread of misinformation should already be illegal under libel laws . I can understand that once the information is posted especially in the final days of an election , that it can ' t be removed quickly and can ' t be unseen . You could say the damage is done . But I don ' t understand what mechanism can be put into place that can change that anyway . Facebook is complicit . These sites pay for promotion . At least they have said they are going to start posting some sort of disclaimer that the information has been reported as false . Thank you for your reply . I mostly agree with you .