This always happens to me . Vision is an intersting thing a long with memory <| sep |> I ' ll take neither please <| sep |> Nope it does not . If you enable this setting then it saves it as a png <| sep |> just ordered a case from FOC . And now we wait . I know this was a while ago , but thanks again for pointing these out ! <| sep |> Okay that makes more sense . That sounds like he just doesn ' t really understand why that ' s wrong as opposed to being controllingabusive . <| sep |> My palms are pouring sweat . <| sep |> Cute . How about no ? <| sep |> Described here . s i n g l e t r a n s f e r ablevotehowthesystemworks 89634 Feb 2011 Simple video explanation here . bLHw 5 kHJpAIf this was applied to America , a state like say California might have 9 electable seats . 5 might end up going to Democrats , 3 to Republicans and 1 to say to a Green candidate . Consequently , you get a fairer representation of each state . i . e . California doesn ' t just go totally Blue , it goes mostly Blue with some Red and a hint of Green . Basically it means Republicans in California get represented , as do Democrats in Alabama . Swing states would be much fairer . Florida might elect 4 Democrats and 3 Republicans for one term and the following term the opposite . i . e . no state would ever be absolutely Blue or Absolutely red . At the end , you add up all the candidates from all the states and whichever party has the majority would form the government and choose a president from among their elected members . So if you chose to vote for a Blue candidate in your state you ' d effectively have been voting for Clinton for President as that was who the Dems had nominated . If you voted Red , you effectively would have been voting for Cruzprobably as Trump would never have been nominated by the GOP .