one thing I ' ve figured out is the enemy only pings radar when they are firingInteresting ! I really need to do some testing in private matches uHyphyBonez you in ? I ' ve been listening for footsteps , and that actually makes sense sound of footsteps and empty radar means danger ! I want to understand better how the inner segment and outer ring of the radar work . What ' s the range ? There could be other modifiers too like that sonar knife or map hack Sonar Knife and Map Hack mean the same thing that your outline is visible to the enemy team . <| sep |> I wanted Tom and Jerry . Did not get it . <| sep |> Well that ' s not good . <| sep |> The link is to is the summary of the bill , not the bill itself , but Basically the bill tries a few different ways to keep people from making enforceable agreements to arbitrate or litigate their disputes under Sharia law . Sharia law isn ' t actually specified , for fear of violating the First Amendmentthey phrased it in a neutral way that is still obviously aimed at Sharia . To keep it simple I ' ll just refer to Sharia as if that were all it ' s about . Choice of law and forum provisions are the parts in contracts that specify what statecountry ' s laws will be used to resolve disputes . If you look at a EULA , for example , you ' ll find a section where you have to agree to arbitrate any disputes under the laws of Florida or wherever . Defining the term strong public policy The bill says Florida courts can refuse to enforce such provisions if they are contrary to strong public policy . In other words , if it ' s basically unAmerican . This is where the bill deliberately avoids mentioning Sharia . But the whole idea , in context , is that Sharia law is contrary to strong public policy . Theoretically , other choices of law could also fit the definition . prohibiting a court from enforcing certain choice of law or forum selection contractual provisions So if you agreed in a contract to arbitrate under the laws of Shariastan , Florida courts won ' t makelet you follow through on that . requiring a court to review judgments and orders of foreign courts for comity before enforcing such orders or judgments This part is to prevent judgments made under Sharia law from being enforced here . Basically , refusing to recognize those decisions as valid in Florida . specifying judgments and orders of foreign courts that are not entitled to comity Defining when the above will be the case . providing that the attempt to apply the law of a foreign country is void under certain circumstances Covering the same idea from yet another angle . prohibiting a trial court from dismissing an action on the grounds that a satisfactory remedy may be more conveniently sought in a foreign country So if one of the parties wants to move the case to a foreign country using Sharia law , and that might otherwise be a good idea because it would be more convenient because of where the parties or witnesses live or where the subject of the litigation istook place , etc . , this part says the other party can fight it , and the Florida court will have to keep the case instead . providing an exception , etc . Specifies that this applies only to certain types of cases .