Marvel Drive , Friedman . look some up man <| sep |> Senor Deeds No Mas Trabajar <| sep |> costco sells 3648 packs for $ 4 . 18 . just for future reference . <| sep |> You must not have cats . <| sep |> Hey , how was your clinic visit ? Did they address your anxiety and how to treat it ? <| sep |> By how much did we win Pennsylvania ? Even in a strange world where a recount happens , I can ' t imagine much will come of it without widescale election fraud <| sep |> Actually used to be . <| sep |> They already did , most likely . Most of the donations were probably from Dems anyways . <| sep |> It ' s not completely clear to me what you ' re saying . For me , the status of mathematical results does not seem trivial . Most naively interpreted , you have demonstrated that there exists a statement and a proof of it which will remain forever valid . The statement is that a finite object with a certain property exists and the proof is simply the explicit construction of such an object . However , this would just be one example where it is simple , and it does not refute that there might be cases where it is not so simple . I could interpret you to make the claim that mathematical results are exactly pairs consisting of a formal system and a derivation in it . Essentially something like Carnap ' s logical pluralism . While this certainly makes things simple , it has the problem that it is far removed from the praxis of most mathematicians . If you try to incorporate the praxis of mathematicians by saying that usually their presumed results can , in principle , be formalized , then it ' s not so simple any more , is it ? Technically speaking , the article says it ' s not so simple , not that the theorems become invalid . With the advent of noneuclidean geometry , the old theorems did not become invalid , but , at least in practice , they had to be recontextualized they were no longer theorems about geometry , but about euclidean geometry . In general , as different theories and systems come and go , results will be reinterpreted . While this is not very problematic if you take mathematical results to be formal derivations , it does not seem simple if you consider mathematical results to have meaning independent of formal derivations , to be mental constructions or to be facts about the real or a potential world whether the physical world or a mathematical platonic world .