It ' s a good think Snyder is only a director so we have a chance , hopefully Geoff Johns will find someone with great talent to touch his baby Lanterns . <| sep |> Not the best person to do this , but I can give it a shot . I understand the downsides of globalism but still see it as a better and honestly almost inevitable way forward than nationalist trade policies . First world economies everywhere are transitioning and becoming more service based , which presents its own set of challenges but those are not good enough reasons to try to stop the third world from becoming manufacturing centers . I wanted someone who wasn ' t going to run away from reality and instead work to get the best outcome from the hand dealt to us . continuing with that , many of the voters in the rust belt who flipped want a good paying job that doesn ' t require an expensive college education . That used to be manufacturing , but it wasn ' t because of anything inherent in manufacturing , but because of strong unions in the 50 s and high corporate tax rates . There ' s an argument that high corporate tax rates aren ' t viable anymore , but that ' s not really my point . A focus on high skill training and certification programs in things like electricity and plumbing would go a long way towards getting those kinds of jobs going again . I don ' t remember exactly what Clinton ' s policy was on the training programs , but I know she was adamant about k 12 education being revamped for a more job oriented focus , which I like better than Bernies free college stuff . I also mainly agree with the whole those jobs aren ' t coming back argument , and I support job retraining programs and some form of federal assistance to get those communities to places where their labor is better utilized . A consolidation of small communities would do wonders for actually having the Midwest be able to support the service economy we are now , and it can and should be done using a free market approach with incentives to move and get training . she actually has a lot of foreign policy experience , even if you think it ' s not good experience . Dealing with a hostile Russia , a North Korea that is hell bent on nukes , and other situations possible India vs Pakistan clash again comes to mind as possible are things I dont believe trump can handle adequately . I really hope he proves me wrong of course . I don ' t want to get into the whole racism thing because it always ruins a civil discussion , but there ' s something to be said about the fact that the illegal Mexican immigrants and radical Muslims he talks about getting rid of look just like legal Mexican immigrants , or not radical middle eastern people . Hell , most people in this country can ' t tell Arab Americans from Indian Americans , and they are two separate groups with one 80 % of the time not even Muslim and usually anti Muslim as well . There ' s no clear identifier between illegalradical and not , and I haven ' t heard a good argument as to how his policies will be implemented without obvious racial profiling . This is of course an anti trump point not pro Clinton , but i thought it would be relevant since it ' s another reason I supported her she understood how impossible that would all be . I ' m on mobile so I can ' t really give a good fleshed out answer , but hopefully this helps .