And yet , the article never says that . You turned a quote into a statement . You were the dishonest one . <| sep |> I don ' t remember but around 50 GB I ' d say . It ' s the exact same game play . I ' m honestly not liking it now . It ' s pretty annoying how everyone is camping using an m 16 or sniper and juggernaut . I remember playing on xbox 360 back when it was still around that time it came out and people would run around without juggernaut . It was more fun , now it ' s just frustrating to play . <| sep |> Wait , when the fuck did we have so many M states ? I ' ve lived here my whole damn life and never realized this . <| sep |> A straight popular vote would be bad as a lot of the population is in a small area meaning they ' ll only be concerned with that small areaSurprised that so many believe this myth . 1 . According to the 2010 Census , there are 108 U . S . cities with population over 200 , 000 . Collectively these cities have roughly 19 percent of the population . If you instead are only interested in the very largest cities , the 14 largest cities with populations above 800 , 000 , these cities have roughly 8 percent of the total population . It would be impossible to win while campaigning only in major population centers , and any candidate foolish enough to try would lose in a landslide , since well over 90 percent of the population lives outside our largest cities . It ' s not clear why people make this mistake so frequently perhaps they are looking at city populations and forgetting that more than half of Americans are either not eligible or registered to vote , or don ' t bother , or perhaps they look at California and New York and immediately assuming that everyone in these states lives in LA or NYC , which simply isn ' t true . 2 . Take the case of battleground states , like Pennsylvania . 15 percent of the population lives in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh , the major cities . Is anyone complaining that to win Pennsylvania , all you need to do is go to Philly and Pittsburgh ? Haven ' t heard that . 3 . Even more extremely , 40 percent of the NYS population lives in NYC . I ' ve never heard of anyone running for statewide office who only campaigns in NYC . Despite 40 percent of the population being in a single city , more if one counts Long Island , candidates seem to campaign just as much , if not more upstate . The problem you are seeking to solve doesn ' t exist . Two real problems are winner take all and disproportionate number of electors per person among different states , violating the principle of 1 person , 1 vote not 14 depending on where you live . We can solve each of thejm easily with a popular vote , which would be much simpler and less expensive , and treat all citizens equally , and none more equally than others .