Dark Valkyrie best imo to see it <| sep |> That hit could have been bad . <| sep |> This username on steam . Add me and let ' s all team up ! <| sep |> Line bro Brave is looting the field should we shoot them ? Gotg fc No don ' t shoot . They earned it . <| sep |> Fuck me up , fam <| sep |> they have been marginalized for centuries and been placed in reservations against their own will . Most of the legitimate sales were con jobs to begin with , they would hardly hold up in court today . They were genocided and now nobody gives a shit . <| sep |> The Ancient Romans specifically used bleeding out for suicide because it is quite fast and blood loss causes a degree of anesthesia . Just saying . <| sep |> Ah gotcha , I did not realize that proving Turing completeness is so trivial as most people have told me by now . I am surprised it is as simple as showing the language has recursion and variable storage and that counts as a rigorous proof though . I think in my head I was thinking of the halting problem which needs to run on all possible inputs to show that it will haltnot halt . What I meant earlier by physical was that the proof involves creating an actual implementation that runs on a computer , whereas the universal Turing machine is a abstract concept . I am still a bit unclear how actual program or proof can map to an abstract concept like that . If the Python language was a purely abstract language with no implementation , then it would be more clear to me .