What a joke . No , it wouldn ' t . It does against the most basic principles of human nature . <| sep |> if stops gave more items there wouldn ' t be a need to go and walk around anymore . But this is just straightup false . Getting a few more items from a stop isn ' t as significant as you suggest . If anything it would give people more incentive to travel to more stops ! There ' s not much incentive to take the time to walk to a stop if you get barely any value from it . Like , just think about it for more than a half of a second . Does it make more sense to walk 5 blocks just to get a few basic potions and one pokeball , or a few basic potions , a revive , and two pokeballs ? Getting 46 items per stop rather than 34 isn ' t going to fill my bag , especially given how few and far between stops are where I live . You clearly just aren ' t getting how big the difference is between ruralsuburban play and city play . This is a walking game , you don ' t get to drive just because there is a lack of Pokestops where you live . Are you dense ? Driving doesn ' t replace walking in ruralsuburban areas . It ' s just the only way to travel anywhere efficiently . The speed cap doesn ' t stop me or anyone else from simply driving to stops and gyms , it just makes it hard to collect already scarce items , and therefore harder to play in general , include when I ' m just walking around . It ' s simple , not having items means I can ' t play . The solution will be to add more Pokestops over time giving you the same conditions as anyone else . That ' s just asking a lot of the development team and besides , it ' s infeasible anyway . A far simpler and faster solution would be to simply give more items per stop . If you ' re soooooo against suburbanrural players getting to have items , why the shit would you want Niantic to give us more stops ? That would just reslut in us getting items . Your reasoning here is unclear . You seem to think subrural players should be able to collect more items if there are more stops , while at the same time you ' re arguing that we shouldn ' t be able to collect more items if there aren ' t more stops . It ' s mindboggling how you can rationalize your disagreement with a solution that ' s functionally the same . It could also just be a short term solution until they add more stops . Deal with it . Spoiled brat confirmedThis just shows you don ' t even want to play the game as it is intended . LOL are you serious , kid ? How ignorant can you get ? You can ' t play the game without items . Walking around does me no good when I have no more pokeballs and have to drive 5 minutes just to see one isolated stop . You are just too lazy to walk , just admit it man . Just admit that I don ' t live in a city ? I already have . The fact that I can ' t play it the way you get to has nothing to do with my willingness to walk . My km count is through the roof . It ' s the lack of worthwhile destinations that ' s the issue , which should be obvious at this point . Have you ever been outside of your city or what ? Yes I have to walk to get to good spots , otherwise all I ' m catching is Pidgeys . I ' m in the exact same situation as you are except that I have more Pokestops where I live . No you ' re in a very different situation . That ' s like a rich guy saying to a poor guy ' I have to go to work , otherwise I won ' t get paid . I ' m in the exact same situation as you are except that I make way more money than you do at my job . ' The analogy is different from our situation in one way , which is that our situation is one of pure happenstance . I just happen to have it way worse than you do , yet you ' re acting like it must somehow be my fault that I don ' t get to have as good of an experience as you do , which is absurd . I told you the solution lol My solution is functionally the same as yours , but it ' d just be way easierfaster to implement than yours would . you are just one of these players who just wants to hear that you breaking the rules is OKCertainly not , considering the fact that I ' m not arguing against the speed cap , but rather to implement a change that would make up for the issues caused by the introduction of the speed cap . You ' re just a spoiled kid who can ' t be bothered to think clearly about the stuff you try to talk about .