Green shirt guy high tailed it the fuck out of there , just barely made it . Same distance as the person by the shopping cart , looks like they got smashed but he high steps right out from under it . Crazy adrenaline rush I bet . <| sep |> It has more to do with congressmen voting in favor of bills that benefit the businesses that donated than for the propaganda . The propaganda helps bolster the benefit of being an incumbent , so people keep voting for the devil they know , while most of the congressman ' s time goes to asking for money and making sure bills that support the donators get passed . Ultimately meaning things that actually concern their constituents get sidelined or put on the backburner . That , or their debt to the donators override how the constituents want their representative to vote . example , a personal example , despite California being home to so many technology companies that have benefited and still fight for the rights of a free internet , SOPA and PIPA came from Californian Senators . I can ' t say for a fact this is because X Hollywood Company donated Y Amount to which senator myself , but it sure seems like a huge mismatch in constituency and policy . Additionally , it equates money as speech , meaning one can now quantify speech and have much more of it .