With hud opacity turned all the way so its just the screen . <| sep |> Does this support upload of photospheres and videos ? Thank you for your work ! <| sep |> Yes , I ' ve watched it . And I ' ve watched some of his other videos about things like population growth as well . And I still find them excessively optimistic . IMHO , he puts a gloss on the figures that makes it look like the glass is half full while mentioning in passing that it ' s not quite as good a picture as it might appear if you look at the data differently . The upside then gets taken out of context and used as justification by lukewarmists Like Mat Ridley . Go back and look at the graph here which is the source data that Rosling is working from . p o p u l a t i o ninextremepovertyabsolute 18201970 was a period of exponential growth in total population but the benefits of technology hadn ' t filtered through the system at the same rate to remove poverty . So the numbers in extreme poverty kept growing and reached a peak in 1970 of 2 . 2 b 1970 is about the point of the big demographic transition where population growth changed from exponential to linear . This coincides to and relates to a dramatic , technology driven rise in living standards along with a mass migration of excess population from rural to urban . Since then extreme poverty has fallen back to the same people as in 1820 , the rural subsistence poor , reaching the same absolute figure in 2010 . Since then we ' ve got another 6 ata points that suggest the linear fal is being maintained . The question now is if the linear fall in extreme poverty can be maintained all the way to zero . Rosling thinks it can . But we ' re talking here in collapse . I ' m not sure we can get there before the resource and pollution constraints start kicking in and the number starts rising again .