You ' re using bad analogies again . In your bank example , you use a much more serious example played around with statements under clients names or withdrew and deposited money randomly to compare to this . Why are you doing this ? Why do you keep trying to exaggerate his actual edits ? It ' s clear that by doing this , you ' re admitting that his actual edits he did are not egregious enough by themselves . So you ' re exaggerating in order to make your point . Except when you exaggerate , you show me that you ' re not having an honest argument . If my bank played around with some completely inconsequential thing in my statements for one hour , like changing a Home Depot item to Home Dummo , I wouldn ' t give a shit . Do I know they can edit stuff in my account ? Sure I do . As long as they don ' t edit what matters , it ' s just not a big deal , not worthy of getting all bent out of shape .