wow so Cyclops dying was a projection ? Thats kind of eh . <| sep |> absolutely everything and anything is worth keeping the peaceThat ' s a bold statement . One that I don ' t fully agree with . Because the alternative is the end of the worldYou can have peace without appeasement or tacit support of Russia ' s aggressive revanchist tendencies . We ' ve not exactly been on the brink of nuclear war with Russia recently . <| sep |> That didnt address my comment . which was that a logical person could say it makes sense that the agency responsible for monitoring our oceans and atmospheres should be in charge of determining where funds for that effort go . Moving the climate work to NOAA just means that NOAA will be able to dictate and better choose where funds for climate change goes . A reasonable person could make the argument that funds for space travel should not be mixed with funds for climate change as the latter is a more pressing concern . It makes sense the organization that is responsible for studying and monitoring the atmosphere would be in charge of where money is spent with regard to that mission . If they want to then partner with NASA on a project or study that ' s fine but it should be up to the people within NOAA to do that . I think it ' s actually short sighted to say that an organization who is focused on exploring space should be in charge of studying the earth as well and can better allocate resources to doing the latter than an organization whose sole purpose is to study the earth and it ' s climate .