You might need to start planning asap but don ' t get me involved <| sep |> so , youd do a Gill . <| sep |> okay , here it is astateoftrance . ps 1 Not very pretty , but I was in a hurry . Anyways it works . <| sep |> Not all of us feel that way but enough of us that it can be made purposely difficult for people . It ' s about to get a lot worse too . <| sep |> Yeah that makes no sense . <| sep |> My husband and I are starting this tonight on your recommendation . So far I totally agree halfway into ep 1 . Did you notice that the Mazzy Star song Into Dust appears in both shows ? !<| sep |> The hell are you talking about ? <| sep |> There is no Halfling Lucky . There ' s Halfling Luck , and Lucky . The post I responded to spoke of Lucky . Also , you are not speaking of RAW . RAW is readaswritten . As written , specific beats general , and Lucky specifically allows you to choose which dice you use . This interpretation was explicitly stated by the designers . By RAW , if you use a luck point from Lucky when you have disadvantage , you get to pick the best of your three dice , as stupid as that sounds . RAI readasintended is less clear . Logically speaking , you would expect Lucky to function similarly to Halfing Luck , mostly because RAW makes zero logical sense . If you ' re planning on using a luck point , you are actually better off if you have disadvantage than if you are at neither advantage or disadvantage . That being said . the designer explicitly indicated what the RAW is without commenting on what the intent is . Normally , if RAW goes against RAI , the designers comment on it , and possibly even issue an errata correcting it . Given that there ' s no comment on the designer intent , it ' s possible that the designers meant for it to work this way , as ridiculous as that sounds . I personally hate the RAW interpretation which is arguably also the RAI interpretation , which is why my game has a house rule where Lucky forces a full reroll at advantage or disadvantage you roll twice with advantagedisadvantage , taking the higher number each time if you have advantage , or the lower number each time if you have disadvantage , then choose between the two results . Probably not the cleanest rule , but it ' s fairer than RAW in my opinion which my players agree with , which is why house rules exist .