Ask if she wants to my fuck buddy . <| sep |> She was in The Big Bang Theory you moron . <| sep |> They ' ve already done the twin thing with Mary so I hope they don ' t introduce another secret twin . <| sep |> IMO , Fifa 17 is a lock . I wonder if those ports will be ready on day one . <| sep |> As someone who preordered not one , but two copies of Aliens Colonial Marines , I would challenge that statement . One for me , one for a friend , in return for having bought me Aliens vs . Predator previously . ACM created an entire fake vertical slice rather than actually working on their game . AFAIK , No Man ' s Sky may have just fudged a couple creatures in a presentation . <| sep |> Jesus , okay , deep breath . The original comments were about trival things being punished by penalties and the accusation of bias . My contention is that a ref should only award a penalty in line with all the preceding precedents in the game , otherwise he is biased and so is everybody else supporting the incident . The ref as the match offical has to uphold the rules of the game and apply those rules indiscriminately , that applies to teams as well as individual infractions . I . e . each penalty should be looked at in isolation and , my contention , should not be judged with reference to previous events . Awarding a penalty for a event which is trival , or rather , more trival than previous standard set for awarding penalties means a biased decision has just been made . The initial commentor was happy with state of affairs and I called him out on it . My succeeding comments were making the point that for a penalty to be justified it has to be a penalty . I understand your position and I reject it . Your position is that a ref can arbitrarily decide to lower the penalty threashold for one team because of something prior . I get it , the ref is trying to stamp his authority on the match . That ' s bullshit though and it only comes about because they didn ' t do their job properly beforehand and they overcompensat ~~ r ~~ e . Imagine a game where one side was held to a different standard , we would all call it out as being wrong . How is it any different if the ref decides to do it for 2 minutes , 10 mintutes or just inside a certain area of the field ? I am all for awarding a penalty and a subsequent yellow card for an acculmulation of penalities . But it has to be a penalty and in line with previous penalties awarded for the subsequent act to be justified .