Well , we use axioms and we even have a convincing reason to do so , and they appear to work , but that doesn ' t mean we really need them even if we think we do , or even that if they appear to have worked thus far they are true . There could come particular instances where the axioms we use seem to fail and we don ' t know what to replace them with , and we ' d probably just wonder and keep using them for everything else . Kind of like Newtonian physics vs relativity . Good enough , I suppose ? <| sep |> Then people will be like Man , Ancient Foglets are identical to Foglets , they ' re just a bit older ! But humor aside , this would be ok but defeat the OPs point of making descriptions shorter . <| sep |> What the fuck ? They ' re making a Lethal Weapon TV series ? First MacGyver and now this , is nothing sacred ?