Maybe you could find a couple entries that you are happy with , and cut them out and make a new journal of sorts . A highlights reel scrapbook , or something . <| sep |> You forgot part of your title lol <| sep |> I chose dictionary . com because its definition is more broad . This definition is a good example of why I wanted to keep the topic open to ideas besides those expressed in the medical community . There are a few problems even within the basic wording of this definition . The most glaring one is normal , which when used in medicine or science generally means average or something of the like . Nearly worse is impairment which really means a change , and only from a perspective can be considered wrong . Characteristic signs are present in any condition . The third criterion , harm , is similarly relative like the first . This definition is purposefully vague , though , due to the variety of conditions it encompasses . I ' m sorry but this sounds very much like the concept of addiction one would assume based on media messages 1 . Addictions don ' t need to cause impairment , many do , but others are benign as I stated , in sufficiently tolerant individuals , opiates cause no significant impairment . The second part , again , describes any good or bad state of the body . The third only reiterates the first .