Still whining about the historical GOP take over ? <| sep |> Not a bad idea . I ' ll add that . <| sep |> I was paraphrasing . My point stands . You ' re being uncivil for a very minor objection . Reading someone say ' Hamilton beat Alonso in 2007 ' and answering ' well , I would hardly call it beating ' is a valid point . You ' re replying with ' No , it ' s not , he did beat him . Look , he was in front at the end ! See ? In front beating ! Loser . ' You ' re being literal to the point of pedantry . They were tied for points . It was increadibly close . His argument is not that ' Hamilton didn ' t beat Alonso '. The above poster was talking about Hamilton being justifiably arrogant for beating Alonso , as a rookie , and his point was that it was so close , it was hardly beating . Hardly . See that word ? Hardly . It ' s a very different point and , again , a valid argument . Edit I ' m being civil , and replying in good faith . If you ' re downvoting me , you shouldn ' t be .