In my experience with Amazon deals in the past , they jacked the price up ~ 1020 % before Black FridayCyber Monday so they could could claim 1020 % off on those days . But don ' t take my word for it . If you see a product for a significantly lower price than the last few months , grab it . pcpartpicker has a great price tracking graph for many products . <| sep |> Damn Bourque . I ' m impressed how well spoken that was . <| sep |> Shhhh baby . Its okay . <| sep |> Yes . ICBC will want those pics , as well as any pics of your car and any other info you have . And , ukrazykanuck 1 is right , you are going to be okay . <| sep |> Dude you got 14 years on your brother ? Damn ! <| sep |> Yeah I ' m not sure what you ' re adding here , that ' s certainly what we ' re hearing as the other side of the argument . I mean , with the ' potatoes ' and ' grow up ' and ' crying ' extras thrown in for good measure , I guess . $ 60 is standard for AAA titles on release . Don ' t know what you mean by ' cheaper than other games on release ' in that case . And again , nobody is getting anything for free . Again , you ' re paying for the game . If this helps you understand consider what we think of as ' the full game ' you ' re buying at the point of release , and how the metric for ' full game ' is fluid and entirely at the discretion of the developer and producer . To cut costs , you release less game , call it the full game , and develop DLC later . This is great for the developer , because this way you don ' t rush development cycles , but you still get a ' full game ' at the time of release . And you get no complaints because the DLC is free . Do you see what I ' m saying ? Free DLC could also be called the rest of the game we ' re releasing later . But by calling it DLC it makes it sound like extra , or more , instead of the rest . It ' s super clever , and I like it because it means you don ' t get as rushed dev cycles , you get to play earlier so you act as a tester , and so usually you get a better game at the end . But understand , you ' re not getting more here , you ' re buying into the rebranding that is DLC . Now consider what didn ' t used to be ' more ' but is considered ' more ' now because of this rebranding Cosmetic changes . This is extra , for a game maker , and for consumer . It ' s not something the dev places a lot of importance on , so it used to be something you do at the end , when you can . DLC is perfect for this sort of thing , something nonpivotal that expands the content of the already full game . And again , charging for it isn ' t the issue . The issue is that it ' s rebranded so people aren ' t upset they ' re being charged for it . And it ' s being charged for , when you can enhance the player experience by also adding gameplay elements to unlock it . HiRez does this well with Tribes and Smite . And that ' s what they make all their money on . No upfront cost at all . But there are people like yourself pushing the narrative that this is necessary . When it simply isn ' t .