[ 유럽연합 , 정치학 , 유럽 정치학 ] EU Enlargement and Copenhagen Criteria || 레포트 > 사회 계열 
 [ 유럽연합 , 정치학 , 유럽 정치학 ] EU Enlargement and Copenhagen Criteria 
 홈 > 레포트 > 사회 계열 > 자료 상세 보 기 ( 자료 번호 : 152885 ) 
 dreamsy 21 
 [ 유럽연합 , 정치학 , 유럽 정치학 ] EU Enlargement and Copen . .. 
 copenhagen criteria EU 에 대한 추천 연관 자료 
 EU 확대 가 사회 적 , 경제 적 으로 미치 는 영향 
 EU 와 APEC 
 [ 국제 경영 ] 터키 투자 환경 분석 ( 영문 ) 
 [ 유럽연합 , 정치학 , 유럽 정치학 ] EU Enlargement and Copenhagen Criteria 에 대한 자료 입니다 . 
 좋 은 평가 를 받 았 던 에세이 
 This essay is to examine to what extent the Copenhagen criteria can be used to explain the decision to exclude Bulgaria , Romania and Turkey from the latest round of EU enlargement from 15 to 25 member - states . 
 Nearly 11 years after the Copenhagen European Council of 1993 , the first - tier 10 candidates , Poland , Hungary , Czech Republic , Slovakia , Slovenia , Lithuania , Latvia , Estonia , Malta and Cyprus , have been accepted as full members of the EU in May 2004 . In the mean time , Bulgaria and Romania as a second - tier and Turkey have still remained as candidates for accession although the first two countries will be able to join the EU in 2007 , provided that they make further satisfactory progress in complying with the Copenhagen criteria . The Copenhagen criteria are essential requirements with which candidate states must comply in order to become full members of the EU . These include stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy , the rule of law , human rights and respect for and protection of minorities , the existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union , adopting in the full common rules , standards and policies which make up the body of EU law so - called acquis communautaire . 
 The essay is divided into three parts . The first part examines what made these three candidates exclusive from the last round of enlargement process in political and economic dimentions , with reference to the Copenhagen criteria . In the second part , I shall look at the limitations of the criteria in order to argue its narrow applications to the accession decision . The last part will , therfore , provide other possible attributes in the EU ’ s reject against three countries . 
 Baun , Michael J . , 2000 , A Wider Europe , Rowman & Littlefield : Oxford 
 Dimitrova , Antoaneta and Dragneva , Rika , Perspectives on European Politics and Society - Bulgaria ’ s Road to the European Union : Progress , Problems and Perspectives p 79 - 104 Brill Academic Pulishers 2 : 1 , 2001 
 Europa , 2002 REGULAR REPORTON BULGARIA ’ SPROGRESS TOWARDS ACCESSION , http : / / europa . eu . int / comm / enlargement / report 2002 / bu _ en . pdf , 30 Dec 2005 
 Europa , 2002 REGULAR REPORT ON ROMANIA ’ S PROGRESS TOWARDS ACCESSION 
 http : / / europa . eu . int / comm / enlargement / report 2002 / ro _ en . pdf , 30 Dec 2005 
 Europa , 2002 REGULAR REPORT ON TURKEY ’ S PROGRESS TOWARDS ACCESSION , http : / / europa . eu . int / comm / enlargement / report 2002 / tu _ en . pdf , 30 Dec 2005 
 Europa , Strategy Paper 2002 , http : / / europa . eu . int / comm / enlargement / report 2002 / strategy _ en . pdf , 30 Dec 2005 
 copenhagen criteria , EU , 유럽연합 
 한국 형 복지 국가 의 가능 성 에 대해 서술 하 시 오 [ 사회 복지 행정 론 ] [ 사회 복지 ] 
 개선 방안 을 통하 여 돌봄 서비스 대상