I think it ' s just the lack of knowledge of how a AAA company operates . I mean maybe it would be the case that the Art team and bug team are the same for indie companies , but that is just not the case and wil never be for an AAA company . Oh well , I mean they shouldn ' t know because they aren ' t designing games or running a company so it ' s not a problem just ask but when people demand stuff , it ' s just silly . <| sep |> Did you read the post ? Where does it imply he used his commish powers ? He just offered a trade and it got accepted <| sep |> First , you ' re misinterpreting the question . The question isn ' t trying to imply that not clearly saying no having sex without consent . It ' s asking whether sex without consent is justified if the partner doesn ' t clearly say no . In other words , I could rephrase it as , Does not saying no imply consent ? Which clearly is not the case . You don ' t have someone ' s consent JUST because they don ' t say no . Right ? Get the difference ? Say you ' re on the couch cuddling with someone and that person starts to go under your clothes and you ' re letting it happen , don ' t pull the hand out , don ' t indicate no in any way . I don ' t think I can blame whoever is doing it at that point for having the impression that you ' re okay with it . Second , if someone is just sitting there like a cold fish and letting stuff happen , would you even enjoy it ? Probably not , and you ' d pretty damn well know something was wrong . Even in cultures where that sort of behavior is sort of common , you have other queues that can inform your behavior .