Does a 3 d printed product share the same qualities as one made from a mold ? For some reason I ' m imagining that if it is 3 d printed it would be layered and more fragile . <| sep |> Evidently you haven ' t been paying attention to my argument if you think that ' s what I ' m suggesting <| sep |> To more fully separate the two points , let us consider speech alone . Is there precedent for anybody being compelled to say anything ? Maybe . In the 1950 s , the United States forced academics to take loyalty oaths in which they condemned communism , or else be fired . Several academics were , in fact , fired , and it was years before the issue was resolved . That was pretty terrible , though , and I think we should conclude that it would be better to not repeat that . Is there a legal compulsion to use certain honourifics when addressing royalty ? Certainly , there ' s precedent for it . Is there a legal compulsion to testify against yourself in court ? Again , in the United States , this compulsion is supposed to not exist , but there are exceptions . Embarrassingly , I don ' t know how this works in Canada , but I bet there is a similar framework for compelling testimony . I don ' t like your scenario because it involves the two things we ' re trying to disentangle . Yes , the legislation itself conflates these issues , but as long as the issues are conflated , it ' s just so easy to trigger somebody on either the speech or the gender dimension .