It was so fun doing it for you ! <| sep |> im sure people are going to joke about your glasses . not me . i think your glasses are like the 17 th thing wrong with you . <| sep |> Actually , if you read the GM reply . The GM admits that they did not actually abusespam chat . Instead the punishment is for his refusing to switch when they are underperforming and the team asks them to . Not for chat abusespam as you claim . Yep I read it . Sadly , it doesn ' t say that on their own information page about what can get you a silence . Is it reasonable that you have to get punished , then contact a GM to find out whether what you did is a punishable offence ? Oh good , you linked a wiki ! Must mean you win ! Shame you ' re too smug to even read the very page that you linked . Too many such arguments have proved too painfully wrong . Authorities must prove their contentions like everybody else . So , saying I think they ' re an expert at their own game , lol ! Is a whole new fallacy known as begging the question ! I ' ll let you go look that one up so you can fail to read it properly as well . Hmmm , actually it may be a nonsequitur instead . Since being an expert on software development has nothing to do with being an expert on the fairness of communication moderation .