Oh , I ' m not trying to ridicule him for looking . shabby , i guess . Nothing against homeless people . I just found it funny that he meant to say I have completely no idea who that is , but said I have the slightest idea who that is , meaning I know who that is , but ever so barely . That ' s funny to me . Wheter he was homeless or not is irrelevant . <| sep |> mic dropOh I hope that did not offend anybody <| sep |> Wha ? I ' m more clean than a kitty lickin ' itself ! <| sep |> Did this law pass second hearing already ? I thought it was just proposed a few weeks ago . <| sep |> This does not really make complete sense . You are basically saying that Rs 3 . 5 lakh of white money is worth more than Rs 5 lakh of black money for the buyer , but Rs 5 lakh of black money is worth more than Rs 3 . 5 lakh of white money for the lottery winner . For the seller , the 3 . 5 lakhs is the only black money he has . The rest of his income is white he is just a regular guy who won the lottery . 3 . 5 Lakhs in black money isn ' t that risky for him he can use without inviting scrutiny . For the buyer , all his income is black in case of a criminal or a big part of it is black for a corrupt guy . He is there to launder his money . This is not the only thing he does he uses several things to launder his income this is one of it . For him the black didn ' t come about because he is evading taxes . It came about because he cannot declare his income . He already has the risk of crime or corruption . Laundering his money reduces the risk for him because a tax raid on him could lead to his actual bigger crimes . And it doesn ' t explain why casinos would want to have lotteries in the first place at all This example wasn ' t about casinos this was a regular lottery tickets . The lottery business is not involved in this laundering . The casino laundering may happen exactly how you describe it . I gave this example to describe how gambling wins are often used to launder money .