That Riven went in tho <| sep |> I do think certain colors tend to pop up often in lines because there are particular dogs being linebred on . That ' s what I said but not explicitly . Blue brindle is not common , which is why people are going bananas on GreyTalk over Gia . Gia is linebred . I bet the other blue brindle female I know is also a partSobers dog . <| sep |> Maybe Project Scorpio can resolve PS 4 Pro complaints ? <| sep |> This entire video is based on a series of straw man fallacies . This isn ' t a conversation about the morality of killing animals for food , rather an assertion that it is wrong by disproving a limited set of flawed assumptions about why someone might consider it moral , and also does not define what morality is for the context of this video . The biggest assumption stated was surrounding the that ' s what nature intended argument . The maker essentially implies that what nature intended is sometimes morally wrong , whereas a nihilist might say that anything that devaites from what nature intended is morally wrong . But that aside , let ' s assume that we are working with standard western democratic philosophies of morality that have been shaped over centuries by popular religion , rules of law , and culture . What makes it morally okay to kill pigs for food is agriculture . That is to say , humans create pigs to be killed for food . When saying humans kill over 20 M pigs a year for the purpose of food , what ' s not addressed is that pigs are not naturally that abundant . These pigs are not being captured in the wild and taken from their pig families in order to satiate human cravings . Their very existence results from human influences they would not exist in the first place if not for the domestication of livestock . They exist to feed humans . After that point , the question is no longer about why it ' s morally okay to kill animals for food , the question is why it ' s morally okay to kill one animal and not another . This is one that is highly subjective based on religion and culture Hindus would not eat a hamburger because the cow is sacred , and Abrahamic religions would restrict eating pork because pigs are considered filthy hoofed animals . In America , we determine what animals we morally can and can not eat based on utilitarian reasons . For example , it ' s considered wrong here to eat horse meat , dog meat , cat meat , etc . because those animals provided valuable symbiotic relationships with us over centuries to the point where we culturally have evolved our interpretation of this relationship from a utilitarian one to a moral one . Cats and dogs specifically have been bred to act as human companions just as pigs have been bred for food . No dog breed today that exists was ever found in the wild dogs exist because humans created them through controlled breeding of wolves . Why dogs were bred for companionship and pigs were bred for food goes back to their value as a domesticated animal a dog can ward off intruders , protect humans , help us capture food , and provide emotional support and aid people who are handicapped . A pig essentially runs around squealing at everything and can not offer as much as a companion as it can offer as food . Additionally , certain animal species have a predisposition to thinking and acting in a way humans can empathize with , thus resulting in the humanization of those animals . We may end up developing a respect for animals at or above our natural place on the food chain , or we see a certain species going extinct and forbid it ' s consumption in order to preserve the diversity of life on this planet . But that is way too subjective as that can come down to personal choice and is more about making an informed decision for yourself ex deciding whether or not you ' d be willing to order Dolphin at a restaurant based on their intelligence and endangered status .