You are strawmanning hard . Your example are just completely wrong , the CDC doesn ' t claim to be perfect . If you can come up with some actual examples , maybe we can talk . Right now you are just spewing bullshit . <| sep |> No love for the Slayer of Demons ? <| sep |> Looks a bit like that tesseract from interstellar <| sep |> Oh okay , thank you ! And when would be the best time to use the nukers ? <| sep |> Walgreens DID but it was before christmas and is probably clearenced out . It was a BatgirlCatwomanHarley Quinn collection . Before that they did Wonderwoman . The matte lipsticks weren ' t so bad . Have tried the LLs yet despite having them . I think hot topic had some Harley QuinnJoker stuff . <| sep |> Actually , we ' ve only had one case like this where it happened because of a file actually coming through in an email and yeah , I can ' t blame them . The mail itself was very well done and actually looked like something our customers would receive . However considering we provide support for a bank , we ' ve been trained to be very careful about stuff like this . We need to make checks like ' Is this a mail you were actually expecting ? ', is it a known emailadres , is there a link in the mail itself that does not check out , . Pressure of someone important or not , they ' re not above security guidelines . It does remain a valid point , sometimes it ' s just very hard to see if it is malicious though what happens between I can ' t open this , help me and there it ' s open is important . Sorry for the late response , didn ' t have time to reply yesterday .