I see a lot of less than three in here and I ' m unsure why . It because that ' s how many times Ireland will beat the All Blacks in the next 222 years ? <| sep |> They write a episode for both outcomes and probably do voice overs aniemate Also they usually produce a whole episode in just one week . <| sep |> This really isn ' t the case . At least here in rphilosophy you can learn why discussing morality isn ' t a pointless argument of opinions . For example , we share some values and do some actions . Nice philosophical questions would be are your actions consistent with your values ? For a majority of first world population , they aren ' t when it comes to their money voting for ridiculous treatment of animals . Now , it ' s not a matter of opinion it ' s a matter of your moral consistency . What a philosopher would admit if not wanting to change is that inconsistency . Not to mention that one might add the degrees of consistency and delve into utilitarianism , but it ' s definitely not a pointless argument of opinions . On the other hand , discussing the health benefits is a pointless discussion . There has been no random doubleblind controlled study on diets and there has to be at least one metaanalysis to give you a strong proof of superiority or lack of . There had only been noisy epidemiological studies that worked wonders for smoking and its health impact but that doesn ' t work at all for diets statistically significant increased risks are way too low and noisy nice article explaining the m a t h s b i g i s t h e r i s k f r o meatingredmeatnowanupdate .