Have the penguins hold fish in their mouths . Then bam ! done <| sep |> Definitely ! I love mine . Also can ' t beat the 10 year warranty . <| sep |> I know you ' re giving me suggestions for future posts , rather than trying to illicit a debate here , but I ' ll respond to this nonethelessI think the central question here is in a free market system how could any business employing humans be competitive in this world , against business ' s that employ RobotsAI . In the future , the typical business will be something on the order of 1 , 0001 , 000 , 000 times more complex than the typical business of today . For instance , spacelines that commute passengers between planets in the solar system , will be as common as airlines are today , but each will require orders of magnitude more work to be done for its operation . The massive expansion of the use and capability of robotsAI will therefore be critical for these spacelines to come into existence . Even if the percentage of tasks that humans do declines from a current 50 % to a future 0 . 1 %, the ~ 1 , 000 X increase in the number of tasks needed to be done will mean all humans will be valued for their labor . In fact , it ' s better to consider what it is that limits expansion of a company or economy ' s productive output , because that illustrates why human labor will always be in demand . Anything that can be produced through automated methods is very cheap . We can produce practically as much as we want . So we will have as many robotsAIprograms as we want , and anything produced by them will be plentiful . But there will always be things that only humans can do , and humanlabor , unlike the robotsAIprograms , cannot be massproduced . It is limited by the number of humans . As a company expands the number of machinesAI that it has , it will reach a roadblock in how much it can grow company revenue , and this roadblock will be the humans needed to coordinate all of these machinesAI even if only 0 . 1 % of the tasks need to be done by humans . If the robots are doing a trillion tasks a second , that 0 . 1 % of humannecessary tasks still amounts to a billion human tasks needed per second , and you will quickly run out of people for further expansion , leading to labor prices being bid up . In other words , since humans are scarce , and machines are plentiful , it is the human labor that will always have the most value . assuming we don ' t create humanlike AI , that would in effect mean we ' ve created artificial people , in which case all economic assumptions , in all schools of economic thought , cease to apply .