have you considered that youre also a douchey guy ? <| sep |> Sounds like they had a romantic getaway . I ' m glad she ' s historybb <| sep |> The mitochondrion is the powerhouse of the cellI know it ' s a direct quote , but still . <| sep |> A fucking legend . Thank you Stevie . Thank you for everything <| sep |> I have the original trilogy on VHS so that . <| sep |> It depends on who wrote it , who checked it and then obviously on the content . Who writes it conflict of interestIf someone working for company A writes about how one of their Products are the best solution to something thats questionable since its obvious that his sponsors want that result . If the same person writes about how a competitor as a better product for a given case that ' s more likely to be true . Also has the Author published other Papers ? Where they sensible ? Who checked it Peer reviewJournalsBeing cited . If something is self published it might be right , but it could also be complete bullshit since no one checked it . Then there are papers published in Journals . The journals themselves want to be known for not publishing crap so they try to filter the crap out . Last also in general papers referenced by a lot of people are more likely to be sensible than something that never got cited by anyone . The content MethodologyPapers generally have a section in which they explain how they came to the conclusion . For someone with understanding of the material they can often spot when the analysis was done wrong . Or if there was not enough data .