Lit is a bit more of a drunk party vibe and dank is a chill smoking vibeTho when its lit you ' re probably also smoking <| sep |> The problem with this line of thinking is that it ignores the fact that cutting funding from NASA will be not only throwing away billions of dollars of investment in research that has actually yielded useful technology that is now used in the private sector , but it also is a fraction of a drop in the bucket when it comes to reducing the deficit . We ' re talking about a fraction of 0 . 5 % of the overall budget . That ' s like trying to tackle a debt of $ 2000 by reducing your $ 400 budget by a sliver of $ 2 . That ' s instead of cutting any portion of the military budget , which blatantly and unnecessarily overspends in its $ 1 . 8 trillion budget . Not to mention that the idea is cutting climate research and shifting NASA ' s efforts back to deep space exploration the place where private sector is arguably on pace to make more progress than NASA in the next 1015 years . Let ' s call this what it is . This is about reversing Obama ' s policies increased budget with more emphasis on climate instead of deep space , not about making a decision that will benefit our budget .