Of course he has aviators . <| sep |> What are you talking about ? TR ' s mission statement is ' a place for really great insightful articles ' which is intended to ' provoke intelligent conversation '. OpEd and Editorial pieces aren ' t disallowed per se , but are dependent upon whether or not they are of sufficient quality . Where TR is falling apart is that it is defending an inherent bias and suppressing dissent just like more mundane , less intelligent subs . Even though by its own founding principles , it should be a place where arguments can stand and fall on their own merit . Look at the top comment Everything he says about Trump saying one thing during the campaign and then reversing it now is indisputable . It should not be given a pass or easily forgiven and the media should be very wary of such action from the top person in government . 32 Conversely , a reply to it why ? Clinton and her crime foundation did things that should warrant investigation , and prosecution , if enough evidence is found . 11 That ' s totally unjustified downvoting of a comment with a legitimate point , at the same level as the personal opinion of the topvoted comment . Is TR here to discuss intelligently or to enforce opinion orthodoxy ?