Well it was an ice cube . but now it ' s part of the hot chocolate . but the hot chocolate isn ' t as hot anymore . but it ' s still probably hot enough to be hot chocolate , because what kind of animal puts an ice cube in tepid chocolate ? So the ice cube is now probably part of the atleaststillprettywarm chocolate . <| sep |> FYI car rentals exist though they ' re only affordable at the airports and outside the city limits . <| sep |> thanks ! it was the card i always wanted and its in my shop ! saved 40 k since weeks for this D i am runnig bait deck , thanks fo advice i can presure them from my side <| sep |> I totally agree , and I hope others start to see behind the curtain ! On morality I see SJWs use the same logic and rhetoric as the social conservatives which is ironic in itself because SJWs are very much opposed to most things social conservatives hold dear . To borrow from 2 You ' re assuming Wendy Cukier and her ilk actually give a shit about stopping crime . They don ' t . Their goal is to end civilian gun ownership , regardless of whether it accomplishes anything in terms of crime . They think owning guns is inherently immoral , in the same way social conservatives think gay marriage or abortion are inherently immoral . Any talk about supposed negative effects of these things is just an excuse . Social conservatives don ' t rail against gay marriage because they think it spreads AIDS and other STDs , that ' s just an excuse they use for why we should ban behavior they think is immoral . Antigunners don ' t rail against lawful gun ownership because they think it promotes crime , that ' s just an excuse they use for why we should ban behavior they think is immoral . The difference here is that Wendy Cukier is a crusader against firearms , and SJWs are a crusaders against the PatriarchyTM . They think that white men in power are inherently immoral and want to get men out of power regardless if it accomplishes anything in regards to sexual assault , supposed pay gaps , or domestic violence . Their talk about these issues is just an excuse to absolve them of the social contract aka the Patriarchy to contribute in order to transfer wealth from men to women via the State instead of through the Family . I ' d be interested to know if there are any genderwomens studies majors who are looking at these parallels . I doubt it , because that would be heretical , but it would be refreshing to know at least .