Damn thinskinned liberals and their safe spaces . Sad . <| sep |> It happens . Had a shit workout on Tuesday morning . My working weight for squats is 245 and on Tuesday 225 felt so fucking heavy . I was gassed by my second set . Everything felt shitty so I just kept going and finished off with some leg press afterwards . <| sep |> I was going to say , Women only laugh at your dick . Womp womp womp . <| sep |> Guess we both like the Habs and Skred <| sep |> He ' s trying to say that a warrior with 25 % base resistance who has two 25 % vulnerabilities stacked on him will still go down to 25 % vulnerable , rather than the two vulnerabilities overlapping as they currently do , putting him at baseline no vulnerability or resistance . Thus , the combined effect of stacking vulnerabilities and baseline resistance gives those two stacking 25 % vulnerabilities an effective damage amplification of 50 %, because while the warrior is only 25 % vulnerable , that ' s still 50 % more damage than they usually take given their baseline resistance . If they then balance healingsupports around warriors having 25 % resistance by reducing the amount of healing available which is what they said is their plan , then burst damage will again pull so far ahead of supports ' ability to mitigate it that the stun lock meta will rise again . Because if you can just stack vulnerabilities , that 25 % baseline resistance might as well not exist , but your heals have still been nerfed .