I could have gone forever not hearing that . I ' m gonna cry . <| sep |> I see the Nike entry in the health app . So I ' m guessing that ' s a yes . <| sep |> If the president destroyed information on the identities and whereabouts of criminals in the expectation that the next executive will enforce the law , that ' d be a pretty clear form of obstruction of justice . <| sep |> I like Gore they might lean on him this week and Pittsburgh is missing Heyward <| sep |> It ' s all fun until some dude takes it too far . <| sep |> I ' m absolutely arguing that the count is all , that matters , that was the way the vote was won ! Of course the count is how the vote was won . but you are being highly selective in deciding which votes should count , what those votes mean , and how they affected the result . You have somehow decided that over 1 . 3 million votes should be struck off the Leave total , and presumably think all the Remain votes are legitimate . What about the extremists who voted for Remain ? What about the hardcore openboarder militants , or the hardcore SNP supporters who want to break up the UK ? Should their votes be discounted to , on the basis they weren ' t voting for the right reasons ? There was no attempt to change people opinions , There was months of it and the polls showed peoples opinions were constantly changing . Why are you doubling down on the idea that everyone voted Leave based on prejudice ? If you consider that to be reflective of a healthy democracy then perhaps I do want a better system for my country . I don ' t and I don ' t consider it to be reflective of the campaign , or the vote . And I again don ' t understand how you can have previously said many people voted for different reasons , I understand and accept that , and then you show you don ' t accept it , or understand it . So what am I meant to believe that you accept people voted for lots of reasons and that they weren ' t all voting based on prejudice or that you don ' t accept it again , and you are back to your orignal position ? You don ' t seem to get that I ' m not claiming any moral high ground , I ' m saying the leave campaign ignored morality . How is that not claiming the moral high ground ? You are arguing only one side had any morality at all . that Leave totally ignored it . If going to the gutter to win a vote is what it takes then I ' m happy to ignore it . It wasn ' t . Maybe if you work out what you actually think , and have the integrity to stand by it and defend it , it would be easier . You are trying to argue something that clearly isn ' t true so maybe it is time you realised you are wrong .