nice memes <| sep |> wow those eyes , amazing ! <| sep |> Accepting dowry is not the same as demanding it . So , if you ' re talking about the latter , then he ' s a horrible person <| sep |> I think it boils down to safe spacers not being able to deal . They . Can ' t . Even . <| sep |> It ' s back up . GO ! <| sep |> Rob is the only one in his family that didn ' t have to scrape their way into the NFL too , so he knows how hard it is to play in the NFL even though he makes it look easy at times . Gronk is also very smart on the field because you need to have incredible football IQ in order to be a superstar in the Patriots offense . <| sep |> Cost of dinner <| sep |> Ok lets chat about this . I very much disagree but you deserve a response . Lets go down the listJenkinson was not bad at all tonight . And not even for a guy who has not had minutes not bad , but actually good , just not as good as the guy who looks like he is becoming the best right back of his generation . At the beginning you could definitely see cobwebs , and his lack of game time definitely made him timid in an attacking sense , but you could also see at like every 20 minute mark him getting better , until at the end he was a real attacking threat . Sure it was his fault for the second goal , but we had been dropping people all night from corners , failing to mark them , this seems like it was eitherA A systemic issue that we have probably not likely because we actually defend set pieces rather well for like 2 years nowB They are good at tacking corners and were specifically targeting our normal defensive set up more likley seeing as it was not just Jenks losing his man POint is jenks was actually good tonight , and this has nothing to do with tactics . Ramsey is a versatile player who plays in multiple positions Better than our other options . We know his best place is in the center , which is where he played today , so what are you getting at . This is also is not about tactics . Playing Giroud and Sanchez in the middle would lose the effectiveness of Ozil . If you play a double striker system that means when the team defends THEY get the free pressing role the one handed to Ozil and the Striker . You could see our initial lack of pressing had to do with Giroud not being aggressive like Alexis , which Ozil visibly complained about until Giroud got off his ass . Anyway , the problem is when in defense in your own half the most effiecent way to defend is two banks of 4 with the extra two men filling holes . The extra two men are as I mentioned Ozil and the striker . In a two striker system it would be Ozil that would be forced to be in that second bank of 4 , which decreases his freedom drastically . He can no longer be as useful on the counter and because of his new duties in attack he has to make sure he does not leave us exposed . We would lose a lot of magic as a result , and unless you play a diamond or 3 at the back , ozil would lose his spot in the center of the pitch as well . Who plays on the left ? We have like 10 players who can , and several can do it on an elite level . What are you on about ? Are you asking what do we do when Alexis is up top ? We play any number of our players who can play there . This for the third time , has nothing to do with tactics . This team needs a change and 3 at the back could be it ? Why ? Like this is actually going to be me getting into my issue with this post . There is no INFORMATION in anything you are saying . Why does this team need a change ? Why do we need 3 at the back ? How does 3 at the back even begin to fix any issues you see in the team ? So lets talk for a second . This year , unlike every other year where we get Arsenal eyes bar last year we have been killing it statistically . We are finally performing on all parts of the pitch on an elite level . The obvious counter would be , well look at our performances , we haven ' t won in jeez what was it 3 games . Lets take a simple look at why . We don ' t have Santi , and no this is not a , if we had X player we would win the league statement . It is a , Santi is an elite player in the middle , capable of doing something incredible , which is he can pass the ball through the middle of the park from deep with ease , meaning our build up play is quite rapid . We do not need Santi , but our 3 draws were the result of us getting a midfield plan b together . Ramsey is that plan B and now that he has some minutes , we can start playing him there again . If Ramsey is our plan B or A who knows why did he play on the left against united ? Because he is coming back from injury and as I noted several times in that game , was really getting his legs back , something we can not take a chance with in the middle . You can really see today as I saw during his sub apearance with Tottenham that he really is the man we need to be our creative deep central player when Cazorla is not on the pitch . My biggest gripe with the whole post is . we did change tactics this game . We played a narrow 4231 and our attacking shape was closer to a 2341 with Ramsey playing further up , or fullbacks droping deeper but staying wider , and our attacking wide players BOTH tucking in more . So what are you getting on about ?