' The one you are trying to cover up with a bath towel , Cenk ! ' Just like the Armenian Genocide , then . <| sep |> We have a Social Justice Club and Counseling Center where students and professors collaborate and circle jerk each other ' s liberal nonsense . <| sep |> What specifically is odd about his batting technique ? <| sep |> That ' s why it is good to express your concern the devs listen ! <| sep |> to pay with my personal data and the added risk of infecting my devices with malware . There ' s a huge amount of misinformation about this . Reputable sites work with responsible ad agencies , where the risk of malware is virtually zero . The information they collect about you is anonymized , and you can even control a great deal of what information is collected and how it ' s used see , for example , and . Maybe I ' m naive , but I think it should be possible to pay only for the articles I ' m interested inIt ' s possible . Perhaps somebody should try it . But the fact that it isn ' t yet the norm isn ' t a good enough reason to simply consume without paying . If you pick up a physical newspaper in a shop , you can ' t justify not paying on the grounds that you think it ' s too expensive and you ' re not going to read all of it anyway . If you don ' t think the price is worth paying , you don ' t get to use the product , simple as that . What I have seen , which seems reasonable to me , is the model used by the news articles are free , but for things like opinion pieces , you need a Premium account . Unfortunately , that doesn ' t also turn off ads , but their ads are nowhere near as obnoxiously intrusive as those on clickbait sites . Blendle seems to be a good idea . For somebody who is so concerned about privacy , you seem to have a gift for missing the obvious . You ' re petrified that some Google ad is going to give you a virus that steals all your private information , yet you have no problems giving a website your email address and a complete list of topics and publications you ' re interested in .