KWA SR 10 . <| sep |> holy shit i ' m sorry <| sep |> Expensive high end I can charge $ 200 for a piece of shit but it sure as hell ain ' t high end <| sep |> Nice work ! I love some of your other creations too . <| sep |> Anyone have a list of black friday shit ? Broke bois we out here <| sep |> I told you , I ' m not here to argue with you over any one point you make , I established that . I ' m here to chastise you exclusively for making unresponsive arguments I can say all of what I ' ve said whether I ' m on your side or the other side of this argument this is a metaconversation about you failing to listen to people , and failing to answer to their actual points . You say , you find it unlikely , but that isn ' t really what you ' ve argued . You ' ve actually argued that there are no ways that would work to change it , even though you don ' t explicitly address that fact . You don ' t want to talk about a critical mass for change , you just say it ' s unlikely , or that open is different from closed , therefore all realworld conditions for changing it are impossible , and similar such arguments that ' s all I ' ve seen you do here , and when you elaborate you ' re not doing the work of evaluation , you ' re just expanding on your point in a way that isn ' t responsive to criticism . You don ' t give the impression of being somebody who wants to do anything other than dismiss criticism , rather than engage with it .