Paradox would just make a worse version of it . <| sep |> Weed should be legal . Guy Fawkes masks should not . <| sep |> Then is Rusty Blitzcrank also not sold in the west because because it will offend other robots ? <| sep |> I made the same move and figured the constant awesomeness would wear off eventually , but 4 years later I still find moments nearly every day where I ' m incredibly grateful to be out here . So much more pleasant if you enjoy the outdoors . <| sep |> Gas some jews <| sep |> ok , so congress will pass some vague bad stuffThat doesn ' t even remotely answer my question . <| sep |> It ' s great journalism in the sense that he presented arguments against a group for whom he has an affinity . My problem is that , other than his brief claim that he generally agrees with Indigenous rights , he goes on to write an entire , lengthy post without ever once referring to an Indigenous perspective . I strongly suspect that his bias was propipeline all along , and that opening claim is nothing more than window dressing . His arguments about the legal process ignores any reference to issues of why the pipeline is legal and the protest against it isn ' t . While that may be the letter of the law , does is follow its spirit ? What about questions of Indigenous rights to land that precede , and therefore perhaps should supersede the right of a petrocompany to profit from exploiting that land ? He or you may not agree with that perspective , but to not even mention it hardly coincides with affinity to a group that does . Remember that what is legal is not always what is right . Many people and groups throughout history have acted illegally in defense of moral right . Those who helped slaves flee the south , those who hid Jews from the Holocaust , women who provided information about birth control when that was banned . Rosa Parks on that bus . all were breaking the law , but in retrospect they were all doing the right thing . Try to remember that legal has more to do with power than justice .