No , it is implying a we that is human . You also imply a we that thinks , and knows , and is doing . If you can ' t describe the we that you identify with each of these objects , there is still two . A human is an object in any form of the definition of an object . We is the subject , human is the object that is common sense and common English structure . Also , if you acknowledge the separate being of a human , you have to acknowledge everything that is not human as well . There can ' t be only human and that ' s all there is a world , water , food . A human is not dependant and self existent . It is not one . Humans , have eyes , a nose , etc . This still implies two , and misses the point . <| sep |> 2 nd and 1 is an ideal time to take a shot .