Pretty good article . This paragraph is the most importantThe real problem is one of practicality . You can be ' right ' but what happens if they deny your claim anyway ? You would be forced to sue to get them to either honor the warranty or compensate you for their breach , Lehto wrote to me in the email . The cost of the suit could be prohibitive , placing you in that weird gray area where 1 you are right but 2 you cannot do anything about it . Which is the functional equivalent of being wrong . After all , what is the difference ? <| sep |> You have done your magic again ! <| sep |> Lightning burst , Tidus burst , and Bartz dupe . Nice . <| sep |> This guys a keeper <| sep |> They need to teach a Scots orthography in schools .