All my niccas independent niccas <| sep |> Okay , for filleting flex is a must , even short knives 4 inch should have some flex to it , its a must when deboning a fish . Handles are important too , smaller is better for me while deboning , larger is nice when filleting , mainly for cutting through bones . Also the main thing is for the edge to stay sharp , sharpening after 1 or 2 fish is bothersome , a good knife should stay sharp for at least half a dozen fish . <| sep |> Should i wait for a better deal for the 3 ds xl ? <| sep |> Wouldnt pasta just . catch fire ? <| sep |> Depends on if you ' re a mech user or not . <| sep |> You could not be more wrong <| sep |> I don ' t see how you took that away from what I said . What I said was , it ' s fucking absurd to hold people to their biological sex because that ' s how you end up with very female looking people in the men ' s room , or male looking people in the women ' s room , or someone born with underdeveloped gonads by your definition being allowed in neither or both ? . I don ' t know what you propose to do about biologically nueter people and it actually sounds a lot like you are advocating for there being a third sex . I can see how you might think I was shifting the goalposts , but in my own mind , right from the beginning I was talking about normal gonads , not undeveloped nonfunctioning ones . In your own mind . Lol . No , the goalpost is definitely shifting . But you ' re honestly just playing into the game I want to play with you where you try to propose an essential feature of biological sex and I go but what about all these exceptions , what the fuck do we do with these ? and then you get all flustered and make up a category for them such as biologically nueter instead of just admitting that you have no fucking clue what you ' re talking about . After dodging the question for about 4 exchanges . Then poof , the definition of female evaporates like so much mist . I ' ll say again that biological sex is a collection of correlated features . It ' s outright impossible to successfully boil it down to one single essential feature . But also , this is directly from the article you keep misquotingThe person must have both ovarian and testicular tissue . This may be in the same gonad an ovotestis , or the person might have 1 ovary and 1 testis . I ' ve also done my own research and found that while in a few cases the gonads are malformed , formed weirdly , or underdeveloped , they also often have limited or even full function . You didn ' t dig very hard . Cited are a few cases worth mentioning . Case 4 was interesting because there was no mention of either gonad actually being nonfunctioning and the graphic clearly shows that she developed both male and female secondary sex characteristics which indicates that both individual gonads were secreting their own hormones .