No , it is partly the size . If it was like a small hash brown sized thing you might be able to handle it , but the size mixed with the fish integrity which he brought up makes it impossible . <| sep |> Is baretta lead or Vero lead ? <| sep |> I haven ' t taken any of the boats in years , but this reminded me of menethil harbor , always going through there to get to Silithus for AQ 40 progress <| sep |> Don ' t knock digging ditches brah , it ' s actually great . <| sep |> This is trying to draw an awkward distinction between selfsabotage and anticonsumer . No , it isn ' t . It is drawing a distinction between company that deliberately did something that hurts everyone in the hope it will benefit them in the long run versus a company doing something that benefits their consumers and their competitor doing the same thing and you trying to attribute it as a bad thing . There is no distinction , in the end both companies have policies that are intended to benefit themselves commercially , end of story . And that ' s what I ' ve been saying all along , companies are to make money , they aren ' t charities . However , their actions can be assessed . The end result is still the same , reduction of consumer choice and denial of purchased functionality . It is negative to consumer . Then enter the following statement If Nvidia hadn ' t developed Gsync , AMD wouldn ' t develop Freesync to compete leading to even less consumer choice . Nvidia releasing Gsync is a positive for the consumer , so is AMD releasing Freesync to compete . You ' re trying to assert as if that AMD releasing Freesync suddenly reduced consumer choice and are trying to make it seem like Nvidia is anticonsumer as a result despite them doing anything anti consumer . In this context , maintaining the status quo is anticonsumer . Stop being this obtuse . What you ' re essentially saying is If they don ' t do what I demand they do , they are clearly against me ! Or the classic If you ' re not with me , you ' re against me . Unfortunately , reality doesn ' t work like that . Another companies ' actions doesn ' t suddenly make them anticonsumer . Yet you ' re trying very hard to assert that . So supply cannot meet demand , thus pricegougeThe price is gouged by the retailers , not Nvidia . And the supply can meet demand . Basically , every card constantly went in and out of stock every day for the first month or so . The demand was overwhelming , the supply still managed to barely keep up . Albeit with frequent restocks and backorders . These are dubious justification when gamers have no choice but to buy said overpriced FE if they want the performance . Gamers have no choice ? You literally have the aftermarket coolers . If you ' re talking the first month then , overpriced ? The 1070 nuked pretty much every card out of the water in terms of priceperformance when it came out even at $ 450 . All your contentions are dismissed . If you ' re not going to bring up any actual points , might as well not waste any more of my time .