I was just using the icon on the desktop , not starting it in steam . I am sadly too ignorant to know if I ' m using the correct exe or not . <| sep |> You need some milk . <| sep |> Are you serious ? I just told you that , a monument ago . <| sep |> we need this stop cmon vikes ! <| sep |> Laby plus adds for para ? I have a bunch of import stuff <| sep |> Yeah his name is Brian <| sep |> Yooooo , my bits aren ' t naughty , they ' re awesome . <| sep |> Try some hybrid booster build , I tried just to add more than 7 points to armor and HP regen and use 4 bul . speed , It ' s a quite good troll to ram boosters or other rams . <| sep |> pollyannaism . blatant ignorance . absolving himself of responsibility of his harmful actions . general assholeryi birthed you and you got harmed ? it ' s not my fault . at least you got to have a life you little shit . appreciate the gift i gave you fucker . appreciate this beatinghe ' s saying life is inherently a good thing even if the person ' s life is shit somehow intellectuals get away with this religious life is holy garbage . he ' s saying the parent is not responsible for the child ' s suffering even if they knowingly pop out a kid with defects that will afflict him til death . he ' s completely absolving himself from any responsibility of acting in the interests of anyone else because he says so . to him , people aren ' t connected at all the fact that a chinaman will get his arm cut off in a factory making your product ? he just ignores it . it doesn ' t affect him . from your standford linkexistence is worth having and no one else ' s interests are at stakeassume life is inherently worth it . assume one person ' s action doesn ' t affect another . assume that because the kid being harmed isn ' t harm to the parents , parents are not responsible . the commonsense morality means that people do suffer and die . it ' s clearly evident . walk into a cancer ward the proof is right there . boonin ' s solution to this paradox ? ignore the bad . just ignore it . just say you ' re not responsible for your kid . just say it . that ' s good enough . it ' s straight religious crap . by identity he means that each person is a super special entity . they are so special that just being born is inherently a good thing because if that entity hadn ' t existed , a different one would have . he ' s saying that ' s a bad thing . he ' s saying if the entity that suffered and died wasn ' t born , some other entity would have been born therefore it ' s bad . it ' s religion . this is how the religious oppose abortion . he thinks that an entity is a certain egg . not a brain . so if my mom had gotten pregnant after her next period new egg , i wouldve been a different entity therefore me being from a particular egg is inherently good . he doesn ' t think that my parents had an influence over me . they shouldnt be responsible , it ' s all about what egg i came from . when someone says they reject nonidentity cases , it means they absolve themself of responsibility for their kid ' s harm . because they say so . That ' s what I got from your post . I googled David Boonin and apparently he wrote something in favor of abortion , so I ' ll have to see how he rectifies his religious crap with proabortion . When does David Boonin think that procreation is wrong By the way some of the quotes you posted are worded , I ' m assuming Boonin thinks birth is only wrong in very very very extreme cases where you can prove 100 % that the kid will have some sort of chronic pain from day 1 . See this for Benatar ' s response to Boonin controlf Boonin lads you right to it