Yep I ' m all on this one too . Thanks a ton . Came out to 210 with some points from my Amazon Credit Card . <| sep |> Still my alltime favorite movie quote <| sep |> SSRose Black and Vegito Blue ohohoho my god , it ' s Tien ! What ? was Krillin busy ? Come on buddy you can ' t be serious . With your power level ? You ' re no android , you ' re no namekian , and you ' re certainly no Super Saiyan . You ' re just human . Tien yeah , well you know what ? FUCK POWER LEVELS , FUCK SUPER SAIYANS , and FUCK YOU ! <| sep |> Is it really a problem to have two different Haskell language websites ? Aren ' t users perfectly capable of comprehending the current situation , where two different groups of actors each have their own view of what Haskell is or should be ? So , rather than try to contain all Haskell languagerelated information in one , monolithic site , why not explain to users that there are two such sites , due to a disagreement , and leave it at that ? I ' m not saying that two distinct Haskell language sites is a good thing , so if this incentive is received well by both parties , I ' m all for it . I ' m just saying that I find it perfectly understandable if someone wants to have their own Haskell language site . I don ' t see any reason that all Haskell languagerelated information needs to exist in one place , nor do I think users demand it either . I think this whole situation is simply a symptom of Haskell growing more popular . FP Complete is making money off Haskell , and pouring it back into sites like haskelllang . org , and tooling , and I think it ' s wonderful . Let ' s no ruin this gift by assuming that all such companies , which may want to spread the good word of Haskell , are all willing or even capable of fitting their content into the haskell . org site . There is no such site as cpplang . org simply because C is way too popular , and I personally think that ' s where Haskell is going too , and that we ' re just beginning to see the symptoms of this .