Thanks . Mom has a contact inside the post office so they can check on it . Although it pains me that I have to resort to using connections just to have my package in my hands . <| sep |> I ' ll also ask who the first person was who squeezed milk out of an animal and went Hey , let me drink this random white fluid and see what happens , .<| sep |> I run an Xyz variant with 2 Master . A bit more risky than the synchro builds but more fun . <| sep |> If it saves me twenty loads of laundry due to blowouts or accidents , then yes . <| sep |> I watched it a few times after , line judge was clearly motioning him to move forward <| sep |> carry in the colder months . plan on getting the shield when Tshirt weather rolls back around <| sep |> Did you not specify in their employment contract that they must pass a piss test at any time ? You could probably recoup the expenses their use causes if you prepare for it like that . The NAP argument you use begs the conclusion , by the way it ' s fallacious . Your assertion is that marijuana use violates the NAP because it ' s an aggressive act , but you never substantiate how it ' s an initiation of force . It would violate the NAP if doing so violated a contract between you and the employee . You are only entitled to the productivity established in the contract , so if it ' s not in there that they can ' t use weed , that ' s on you . If it is and the NAP is violated in this case , take ' em to court and get those losses back . As your argument stands , it ' s using a Marxist interpretation of property to come to the NAP conclusion .