It ' s a victim of bad press , much like most offal . Also as it takes so long to mature , there ' s very little money in it . Not like spring lamb , for example , which takes 810 weeks to get to slaughter date <| sep |> I would like one please . My Discord is RealJBTYTM . <| sep |> WOW ! THANKS SO MUCH ICEMAN ! !!<| sep |> I ' m not sure if you are going to get an answer to this . Or at least not the answer you are looking for . There are tons of math articles describing the possible number of positions in chess more than the number of atoms in the universe . So chess has plenty of depth and complexity and an annoying penchant for missed opportunity and a sudden deadly counter attack out of a won position the second you let your guard down . Ultimately , it seems that mid to high level chess is about the art of the double attack . If you have caught any of the world championship going on , then you have probably heard the phrase well this is drawn because there are not two weaknesses . And I think this makes sense and is logical . You need to be able to threaten two things at once think about how you win in tictactoe . you have to play to win in two different ways . Beyond that , I can only guess . I only rarely have seen triple threats usually forks with the knight and not usually at the top level , but the issue becomes that you can still only play one of those moves and the complexity for that attack must come from somewhere such as attention to ones own defense . I would make the assertion that at the top level , super gms , they play on every facet they can from strategy to clock time to psychology . Most people complain about the number of draws in high level chess , but I believe that is a reflection of how vastly resourceful chess is .