Must run in the family because your mom loves to take the knob . Heyooo <| sep |> It can . Some explosives are hard enough they can collapse a lung , cause your heart to go in to cardiac arrhythmia , bounce the brain , snap a spinal cord , rupture organs , all without causing superficial injury . <| sep |> Funk Lcio ? You dont know what you willing for . Brazilian Funk Funk p <| sep |> You should nominate EP 1 for the I ' m Not Crying , There ' s Something In My Eye award so it could win that , and you can nominate like . EP 3 for the Hella gay award . D <| sep |> That wouldn ' t be a small ball lineup C in today ' s NBA . In today ' s NBA that ' s just the size of normal Centres keeping in mind Ducan spent more time at C then at PF in his career . Your arguments for why Duncan could beat them is poor . Firstly , of course he can beat them at an aspect of the game offensively . He ' s Tim Duncan . That ' s the point , no one can stop great players , they can slow them down . You just quoted the Lakers guarding Duncan with O ' neal , do you think he ' d do a better job than Gasol at guarding him outside ? We aren ' t comparing who would be guarding him with perfection , we are comparing them with 2003 . Secondly , your points don ' t really hold up . Why wouldn ' t KAT be able to do much ? Gasol is fast enough for a centre , he has fantastic footwork , he can guard perimeter players outside let alone duncan . What do you think Duncan will be doing ? He isn ' t going to be dropping 3 ' s or crossovers . Gobert and Whiteside actually rank very highly in post defence based on synergy . My main point is simple , todays Centres are just as well equipped to defend Duncan as the PF ' s of 2003 were . Today ' s defenders aren ' t perfect , neither were they in 2003 , but they are good , just as good as the ones in 2003 .