Okay , sorry for making you upset . I never asked you to do it immediately , it ' s just that at my time zone , this is the only time I can send messages here . I also don ' t know what you mean by punished , sorry for being noob . I hope you understand . Either way , thanks for responding so far . Sorry to make you feel rushed , it was never my intention . Have a nice day . <| sep |> Somebody pls employ rush . I want only the best for my kind boy . <| sep |> If they bomb tourist beaches that ' s a big problem . <| sep |> I ' m tryin ' my hardest here . Sniffle <| sep |> It wasn ' t ? Let the dangerous idiots speak so people can actually hear the insanity and decide for themselves ? <| sep |> Did that happen though ? I mean , did she end up getting in or was she kept out . If they didn ' t let her in and an apology came later , then it certainly wasn ' t corrected immediately . When leaders at the center learned what had happened , theyapologized to Garcia and San Diego Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman . ' We do not wish to ever make any community member feel unwelcome these officers are valued members of our community , ' Delores Jacobs , chief executive officer of the LGBT center , said in a statement . Second , nobody would consider the issue as corrected in the Target case unless the person was firedAgreed , never said that wasn ' t the case . Is the person that turned the officer away still working for or affiliated officially with the community center ? If not , then it doesn ' t sound corrected to meYou ' re right , if someone makes an honest mistake , best to just get rid of them rather than try to educateWho said it was one employee ? The story doesn ' t specify how many were working the door when the officer was turned away No , it doesn ' t . But we ' re talking about one incident . Even if it was three or four , it ' s still one instance of misunderstanding . And until it does state how many were involved , there ' s really no point in speculatingAn honest mistake typically means something that was done without malice . Unless you are a mind reader , how can you say that the persons that turned away the officer weren ' t acting maliciously ? This isn ' t to say that they were , BTW . I certainly don ' t know one way or the other . My only point is that you don ' t either so it seems like you are just spinning this based on some personal agenda . I ' m not spinning this any more than you are . But unless there ' s evidence that they did act maliciously , the responsible thing to do is to hold off judgment , not accuse someone else who is holding off judgment of being biased . I have no agenda , please show me what I said that indicates as much