Thats fucking scary dude . <| sep |> Meh . Just make ~ a function . <| sep |> That board <| sep |> Not a fan either but I really think it deserves that category so I gave it my vote . <| sep |> Define good if you mean ref fuckery then yes <| sep |> The red vietnam is a nice , mellow red . <| sep |> paging uCCPFalcon so he ' s gets to read boneytooths answer above me <| sep |> They ' re saying they only lost three yards on that ? <| sep |> Link the place <| sep |> IT ' S FUCKING SAM FROM CHEERS ! Yep , knew exactly what you were referring to . <| sep |> Literacy does not always follow the achievement of surplus . No one suggested it does and in any case , what has that got to do with anything ? I mean seriously ? How do you imagine that ' s relevant ? Here ' s what you argued I would argue that the invention of writing i . e . , perfect memory precipitating civilisation in so many cases , I think , implies that our memories are so bad that consistent cultural behaviours have a limited lifespan when transmitted aurally . Literacy rarely precipitates civilization so your entire premise is bunkum . On the contrary a surplus always proceeds civilizations that invent literacy and proceeds the invention of literacy in such societies . Meanwhile preliterate societies tend to have very stable cultures relative to literate societies . Bunkum .