Fucker did a real life upvote party lol <| sep |> What integrated is it exactly ? If we don ' t know it can vary between unplayable or doable on like 720 p <| sep |> yes , because I know she an exception to the ' norm ' While many births dont end in life altering injury , enough do that ' s its a concern . And aside from life altering injury or death from stroke , embolism , sepsis etc , and even the milder physical traumas , there is the impact on mental health . Women forced to carry unwanted baby ' s do desperate things many try take there own life , and post birth there is post partum depression and psychosis along with the high likelihood that being forced to give birth will leave her with PTSD which can happen to women who wanted to give birthBecause I see it as the lesser of two evils . Abortion carry ' s less risk to life and health to the woman why is the route with the most risk to her the least evil route ? Surely the safety of the woman should come into the equation if lesser of two evils is the bar , that would make forced abortion the lesser of two evils . Correct . Yet the status quo is that the shouldbe rights of the Father are infringed upon and no consideration is given to the rights of the unborn child . The father ' s right to bodily autonomy is not impacted . You have no right to fatherhood , women have no right to motherhood . And the rights of the fetuschild we won ' t see eye to eye on because I think it doesn ' t get rights to bodily autonomy and other human rights till it doesn ' t require another humans body to survive 24 odd weeks or what ever modern medicine has it down to as we advance . If you could whip a embryo out at 6 weeks and cook it in a incubator then I ' d be all for giving it rights to bodily autonomy at 6 weeks , but as things stand I think the rights of the living person trump the rights of a soon to be living person if nothing goes wrongSo to preserve a womans right to bodily autonomy you have to ignore the rights of the Father and the unborn child . And this is not right either . Your not impacting the rights of the father at all but having an abortion . He as a individual may be sad but he may also be sad if she doesn ' t have an abortion so if that ' s the bar we are back to saying forcing an abortion is fair cause otherwise it ' s not fair on the potential fatheras an aside , I think this is wrong too . As far as Organ donation goes it should be opt out , not opt in . We , sort of globally or at least in the West , feel bodily autonomy is a human right so sacred that you can ' t tho . That ' s the point . You can ' t compelled another person living or dead to save your life . No one can decide what happens your body with out your permission . Your suggesting that men be giving that right over women , as tho it would make it fair as opposed to making it thoroughly unfair as would make pregnant women less than humans . That ' s with out touching on the fact that rape and reproductive coercion happens and you say there would be exceptions for those cases , but the child would be heading for secondary school before the case was solved by the courts . Rape is near impossible to prove with the solid evidence , reproductive coercion is for all practical purposes impossible to prove so what ' s the point in having those as exceptions where women can chose for themselves what happens there body , you either have a system where women are forced to lie to a dr to be able to keep the pregnancy or abort it or you have exceptions that are totally pointless and need not be put in place at all because it needs to be brought through the courts and that ' s impossible within a time frame where abortion is accepted currently . So while it helps reconcile the idea that it ' s the fairest way because exceptions would be made for victims of these things its totally impossible to have as a option in any way because all it does is give men and women reason to lie to protect there own interests .