Ei kannata pyrillkn lhell keskustaa jos ei osaa liikennesntj <| sep |> Why do you say I have trouble discerning ? <| sep |> I think it is Hannah ' s Whaat ? although it also doesn ' t makes much sense . EDIT She also says Wait later . <| sep |> WTB Yeezy 350 UK Size 8 . UK based preferably <| sep |> My experience is that adding oil will cause dust to stick , and it ends up worse . <| sep |> This is a very common but very unfortunate understanding of security , helped along by a lot of awful implementations of security over the years , and I wish we ' d move away from it at some point . The point of security is to increase convenience with the help of technology . It is more convenient for me to be able to log out of my work computer than to take it home every day . It is more convenient for me to know that I ' m sending a message via Signal that only my friend can read , than to send one via Slack that stays on Slack ' s servers and might be leaked , and worry about what I say and how it might be misinterpreted . It is more convenient for me to decide that I trust my OS distributor to send me an authentic ls command than for me to download the source code , audit it , and compile it myself . It is more convenient for me to be able to transfer money between bank accounts on my phone than to go into a branch in person . Or , for a noncomputer example , it is more convenient for me to lock my door and leave for Thanksgiving break than leave it unlocked and replace everything that gets stolen . That ' s also technology ! The trouble starts when the technical mechanism is excessively complicated compared to how much convenience it actually saves you . A key is a few seconds of inconvenience compared to just opening an unlocked door , but that ' s pretty minor compared to the inconvenience of someone stealing everything . A key is not very strong security , though you can pick a lock . I could be even more secure if I hired an armed guard who took my fingerprints every time I get home , but that would be a lot more inconvenience for very little practical advantage . And some downsides , like not being able to authorize someone to drop by my home without me being home . We ' ve had a lot of highinconvenience , lowpracticaladvantage systems over the year . PGP is one of them I hang out in circles where people actually care to use PGP , and so few people have a know how to find trust paths or have a sense of when they should or shouldn ' t sign someone ' s keys . The email client support for PGP is pretty awful . It ' s a lot of work , and in theory it ' s super helpful , but in practice , I ' d rather have the inconvenience of people potentially reading tampering with my emails in transit . Pick the good security mechanisms , and you get convenience too . Compared to PGP , HTTPS is a massive success story . Like keys and locks , it ' s not unbreakable , but it ' s excellent for what it does . Pick the bad security mechanisms , and they ' ll trade off inconvenience for even more inconvenience .