Wow so I get a bunch of down votes for saying what I ' m thankful for ? Well I guess that ' s just the Internet P <| sep |> Meh , still a lumen keep eating <| sep |> Best thing with these are stuff like that . When you get You for 9 kills as Nova , more than the average of 3 . 4 <| sep |> Why wouldn ' t you want your perfect pokemon in a perfect ball ? Unfortunately the perfect ball is subjective . <| sep |> Honestly , this kind of repost I can handle . <| sep |> Happening to me for few years and it does the same with notifications of channel that I watch frequently , but as said , not anything from YouTube has been adressed to fix it . <| sep |> May he rest in peace and never come back from WoW . <| sep |> Here is the post for archival purposes Author sbc 1 Content Currently the miners signal their preference for possible updates of the protocol Unlimited , Segwit and so on through the mined blocks , but I don ' t see the users having the same option . Would it be possible to let each transaction signal the users preference as well ? It would possibly make the transaction slightly bigger and more costly , but possibly not by much . It would also be possible to fake , but if you evaluated this signaling over all the blocks of several weeks or months , perhaps weighted by volume or bitcoindaysdestoryed , and not just number of transactions , it would become quite costly to fake a preference from the users . Has this been considered in the past ? Or is there a downside I ' m not seeing ?