Whilst I don ' t think it ' s as good as Casino Royale it ' s still a good film which shows Bond can be more than a mindless killingquipping machine . I recently watched it back to back with Casino Royale and it seems like that is definitely the intended way of seeing since it is essentially the second part of that film . <| sep |> Minny D , Dez , Gore , obese Robert <| sep |> Very nice . Both upvoted here , and rebloged on Tumblr . <| sep |> I think you ' re doing what a lot of people on the left are doing these days . You ' re confusing a moral good for a human right . The second solution is the best solution if resources were limitless , but they ' re not . The problem that this picture doesn ' t touch on is who is paying for the boxes . It would be unfair for Guy A to pay more for his small box than Guy C pays for his big one . That both discourages Guy A from excelling Why try harder if I ' m not going to get anything extra out of it ? and discourages Guy C from trying Why try at all if I get the same amount either way ? That ' s a loselose scenario . With our current system Guy A and Guy C are both encouraged to excel . They might have unequal starting points but giving them unequal tools isn ' t the answer because statistically they ' re each more likely to trend toward the same side of the bell curve that they started on . Imagine if the NBA forced every team to put two women on the court at all times . It wouldn ' t improve the game for the men or the women . The correct answer was starting the WNBA . Sure , it ' s not as glamorous and it doesn ' t pay as well but it ' s an environment that rewards its participants fairly relative to what they ' re putting into it