Keep thinking that . We ' ll continue to get shit done and keep winning , while you complain about not having enough free handouts from mommy government . <| sep |> I have a bit of a Don Draper feeling toward the Lions I just don ' t think about them at all . I wish them well . Fuck the Packers . <| sep |> That ' s a perfect way to ensure I never attend an event . Fuck that nanny bullshit . <| sep |> There ' s an old inspiration album of highernumbered New Balance styles that you can check out . The grey colourway is very versatile , so you could pair them with a lot of different casual outfits . <| sep |> I ' m sort of confused by your comment . You mean that demonstrating double standards , even in the face of them continuing , isn ' t useful because they ' ve been posted before ? I ' d assert that the entire modern gender argument is primarily ideological at best . That is to say , while it used to be necessary to provide data to show that one gender women required the full force of societal coercion to correct an imbalance , now it merely requires saying the imbalance exists repeatedly for that force to continue with its inertia . To wit , I can literally list inequities that exist for , say , black people , that exist for the average man , and it wouldn ' t matter patriarchy still exists , and therefore manspreading will get proportionally more time by society . It ' s impossible to win such arguments on standard adjudicating grounds . In other words , the way we argue things is very different now than before , and in my more cynical view , it ' s precisely because those initial imbalances have been corrected to the advantage of that formerly oppressed group , and now that data isn ' t available for them to use . So they use dehumanizing rhetoric like the above to make people believe such sweeping discriminatory inequities exist , and try to convince everyone that when they do such things to their targeted oppressive group , it ' s ok , even though it ' s hardly supported in evidence and would be repugnant to do to any other group , even by their own admission . In other words , the data we used to use say , educational attainment , wealth control , voting power , etc to justify why women needed systemic changes in their favor often , simply put , now favor women , so feminists have moved the board of debate from legitimate data use to merely saying things are unfair in the most dehumanizing way possible . Such a thing needs to be fought everywhere because it ' s literally the only way these sorts of feminists can keep intact the man bad , woman good dynamic which underpins much of our societal gender policy . Indeed , the race gender switch is so powerful that it usually induces the type of angry response here by feminists precisely because it works .