Clearly its not just me . Its frustrating you know you are better than another player but because RNG was in their favor , you cannot beat them anymore . Another enhance in my guild , I consistently kept up and beat on most fights despite a 58 ilvl gap in his favor . Once he got the ring roughly 30 k dps increase , im basically unable to surpass him anymore . For some classesspecs this is even more drastic . <| sep |> Ugh . that is so so sad . <| sep |> Lol we suck <| sep |> If you ' re referring to me , what I said is indeed true . <| sep |> How about 0 catches in the whole game ? <| sep |> Teams are really out Lionsing the Lions lately . <| sep |> Have to do it at checkout . Normal codes are 12 digits I believe <| sep |> Yep , disagree . I just disagree all over this bullshit . The only usefulness of an analogy is to illustrate one dimension of your point . So if you want to illustrate that he did something wrong , then that ' s one dimension of your point and your analogy works for that one dimension . A second dimension is the question of how serious was the wrongdoing . I hope you ' ll agree that if a kid stole a cookie from a cookie jar , it would not be appropriate to analogize this to a guy robbing a bank . Now , if you were a parent and you were trying to tell a kid that he ' s going down the wrong path , you might say stealing from a cookie jar could eventually lead to something worse , like robbing a bank ! But you aren ' t saying this . You ' re trying to tell me that the edits that uspez made are the same as my bank stealing money from me . Analogies are supposed to illuminate one dimension of the problem and nothing more . Your analogies illuminate one dimension he did something wrong but , because your analogies exaggerate the problem , your analogy presents a dishonest illumination of the problem . Your analogy separates us from the context of the original incident . Again , if this was a bigger wrongdoing , you wouldn ' t need to exaggerate . The fact that you ' re exaggerating reveals that this is a much smaller problem than you ' re willing to acknowledge . I accept what he did was wrong , stupid , etc . I don ' t accept that it was more than a prank . If we ' re using analogies still , it was like if my dad toiletpapered your house . If I do it , it ' s just a harmless prank , kind of a shitty thing to do , but also a bit funny and pretty harmless . If my dad does it , it ' s a little worse like it ' s worse when the CEO does it , but it ' s still a prank . We also know that my dad could do a lot worse than toiletpapering your house , like stealing your car , but that ' s not what he did . He just toiletpapered your house , so let ' s not pretend that what he did was worse than toiletpapering your house .