I ' m going to try my hand with a premade and see how that goes . They are my friends , but I always find their lack of concentration upsetting , since they don ' t seem to take me or the game seriously . I also want to get better at offense and different tanks , since right now I ' m basically a support who can play d . va and mei <| sep |> The referencesources for those PCA plots and Harappa DNA Project are here . These are peer reviewed samples . These samples are not peer reviewed if they are not in a paper . Why don ' t you just send me a paper that interprets Harappa DNA Project ? I don ' t trust random online docs you ' ve posted a hundred times . It ' s either a scientific paper or you have no source . Welcome to academia ! You cant ignore themTinypic is not a source . I ' ll ignore them like any respectable scientist would . Either a published paper or nothing . I don ' t care about your interpretation of any data . I could not care less . Sindhis being closer to ' North Indians ' than to Pashtuns . I challenge you to show any . You haven ' t shown otherwise , so why argue here . Also nice strawman . I think in an spectrum between North Indians and pashtuns , Sindhis will be spread between them . list of publication is your argument here with these papers . Did you just randomly sprinkled all of two papers you have in this subject in the comment . I already commented on both of them , why waste my time . Just read my last comment . This is the reason that every genetist refers to Harappa DNA with regards to South Asian geneticsWhy not just show it in a paper then ? You can see ANIASI ranges here 0 AuW 3 R 0 YsP 4 HdDhib 1 M 5 OE 1 wWENNb 2 haUFFWZzNBMEE # gid 0 Random online doc is a garbage source . contentuploads 201103 H a r r a p aSouthAsiaParticipantMapC 1 . jpgRandom image is a garbage source . References that dont agree with you arent ' garbage ' TIL tinypic images is a reference . ANI is basically every genetic component that isnt ASI . No it isn ' t . You haven ' t even read the paper I sent you . The reason SSAAfrican isnt mentioned in ANI is that South Asian have very negligible amounts of it but some Balochs and Sindhis show it and its regarded as part of ANI . Or you know they actually get the ASI components from dravidians or tribals like the rest of the Indians . Just cite a paper . Until then your words have no credibility . ANI and ASI are both proxy components and dont represent direct ancestry from ' Europeans or Middle Easterners ', TIL genetics don ' t show ancestry . Let ' s just look at the scientific paper on this By introducing methods that can estimate ancestry without accurate ancestral populations , we show that ANI ancestry ranges from 3971 % in most Indian groups , and is higher in traditionally upper caste and IndoEuropean speakers . Oh wait , even the paper that is an authority on Indian genetics calls ANI and ASI ancestral groups I dont think you know how genetics work . Yeah , it seems neither me or the scientific community who wrote the paper on Indian genetics that published in Nature don ' t understand genetics sYou don ' t know how academia works . You haven ' t produced one respectable source that supports your statements . All I have seen is random tinypic images and online docs . The three papers that you did present last time also don ' t support your assertions . Stop wasting my time . Anyways , I ' ll reqoute A SCIENTIFIC PAPER According to Ethnic India A Genomic View , With Special Reference to Peopling and Structure Article PDF Available in Genome Research 1310227790 · November 2003 Central Asia is supposed to have been a major contributor to the Indian gene pool , particularly to the north Indian gene pool , andthe migrants had supposedly moved to India through Afghanistan and Pakistan . From mtHVS 1 data , we have estimated Fst values between the populations of the Central Asia and Pakistan regions data were collated from Calafell et al . 1996 Comas et al . 1998 Kivisild et al . 1999 a and those belonging to various geographical regions of India . Populations of Central Asia and Pakistan show the lowest 0 . 017 coefficient of genetic differentiation with the north Indian populations , higher 0 . 042 with the south Indian populations , and the highest 0 . 047 with the northeast Indian populations . The Central Asian populations are genetically closer to the uppercaste populations than to the middle or lowercaste populations , which is in agreement with Bamshad etal . ' s 2001 findings .