LOL , the ceo has thinner skin than hungry cannibal swimming in volcanic acid <| sep |> No way . There are dozens of us . DOZENS ! !!<| sep |> In my country they dont really care about yeezy ' s the last pair sat on the shelf lmao , they mad like 5 pairs in store they barely sold 4 in about 1 month and the last one they gave it for free on a tombola <| sep |> very good points , however I have a few points in regard to your response I would love to hear what you have to sayPrimarily the case of historical colonizers I would argue that there is a huge differentiation between the modern world and the historical events you ' re referring to . Today there is a sense of globalization where people are consistently exposed to information from different groups of people , different cultures , etc . Conquerors and colonizers traveled to lands in the name of their nation to CONQUER , without the intent to just go visit and learn . I think this difference in opinion most likely comes from the how we are defining traveler in our explanations , however I do agree that some of the most evil people in the world were colonizers who did travel . I also think that your reference to the European capital shows the effect of tourism vs active traveling . I believe accounts of traveling where one is simply visiting a new countryarea and not actively trying to experience or get something out of their surroundings is nothing more than a vacation and most likely will not lead to any learning . As for the American curriculum , there is a fair amount of studies in primary school and in universities that require learning world history . It comes down to the difference between knowing something and experiencing it first hand . For example , anyone can read about the kinds of food that is traditionally served in a culture , but to understand it you would need to try it .