That ' s probably a long way away , even given that selfdriving technology is becoming available . For that to happen you would need only self driving cars . <| sep |> Happens to me all the time , even when I sit directly infront of my computer . Theres not enough of a trigger to let you know its your turn if you have the window minimized or in the background . <| sep |> In case you ' re serious , that ' s Shigeru Miyamoto , creator of Super Mario , Zelda , and Pikmin . He ' s generally listed as the producer of many Nintendo games . <| sep |> A government can ' t really have intent thoughThat ' s patently false . A government can , without a doubt have some form of intent . Take for example the many countries that state they ' re enacting a law or policy ' to further X '. That is a textbook statement of intent . many of the starvation were in fact forced in Russia helped kill of some of the intelligencia that might resist the revolution to utopia . But that ' s not my argument here . You ' d have to argue a little bit further , I don ' t think the USSR , at least not in large numbers , deployed starvation as a weapon . government can ' t murder at all , considering that murder is ' intentional illegal killing ' Let ' s not bullshit ourselves hereIn the U . S . , special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought , characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime , as robbery or arson firstdegree murder and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation seconddegree murderThe US does not actually categorize murder as something that is explicitly illegal , or even necessarily . Say I was a single father with a small amount of savings and a young daughter . I waste all our spending on lottery tickets , but I don ' t just blow them all at once . No , I sit in front of the lotto machine and play scratches , slowly , repeatedly inserting money into the machine for hours , keeping an iron grip on her right hand as her left tugs on my sleeve saying she ' s hungry . And I continue until she starves to death right next to me . Now , is that manslaughter or murder ? This is fairly well documented , and considered criminal neglect and manslaughter and potentially even 2 nd degree murder . There ' s a certain point after which intent is not needed , and is replaced with responsibility . This is one such example . A government that fails to have the kind of structure with checks , balances , and sane leadership in positions of authority is more or less braindead . The issue here is that you assume intelligence prevents any sort of mistakes or issues . Some of even the most gruesome accidents will still not have their perpetrators held responsible , because they had absolutely no way of knowing , or it was a truly honesttogoodness mistake . Take for example the concept of crashing your car versus bumping into someone . Both can feasible result in death . But only one can have feasibly have you charged . when a government refuses to discontinue its faminecausing policies over repeated years of wasteful harvests and starving offseasons , and murders anyone that tries to deviate from these plans , there ' s nothing left to call it . What if the intent is to stop the famine ? If that were the case the question becomes Is murdering a murderer , still murder ? Is it still immoral and wrong ? Murdering economic dissenters is the same thing as locking someone in a box . That ' s not really true . There ' s definitely something to be said about the way in which , and reasons for killing someone . It ' s why we have war crimes .