Don ' t buy the game . <| sep |> I ' m willing to do it right now <| sep |> Holy shit wouldja lookit that ! <| sep |> Dam that ' s a good looking subie <| sep |> Either way fuck the NFL . I mean 10 games for that is fucking insanity . Punishing a player for taking a specific kind of medicine is bullshit . Something ' s got to change here . <| sep |> Try reading at this . For DLC , consider Semper Fi , For the Motherland , and Finest Hour . <| sep |> Can a woman not cum by force ? <| sep |> Achievement Earned Boob JiggleWatch them wiggle , see them jiggle . <| sep |> maybe not the teachers but parents should be allowed . I know it worked on me well . lol <| sep |> Lol at the people saying its not like that ! . It really fucking is . <| sep |> Sure , though it ' s somewhat problematic that Carlin simultaneously claims to not be a historian and also to be telling accurate histories . He uses the I ' m not a historian claim as a way to defend himself against criticism regarding accuracy , but then claims , by and large , that his shows are truthful I think that if you claim your shows are truthful , you have similar responsibilities to accuracy that historians have . Sometimes the most accurate historical account is not the most interesting , or do not make for great storytelling but usually those interpretations are left out of his shows . If he stuck a disclaimer on his show that aspects of his narratives are exaggerated or perhaps questionable , I ' d be more satisfied . But I do think that the bigger problem isn ' t Carlin himself , but portions of his audience . There are some people and I recognize not everyone who treat him as a de facto historian , and take his podcasts as totally accurate accounts of the past . As I said , I don ' t want to sound like I ' m trashing the show . Generally I think it ' s pretty good stuff . And I will give him credit for acknowledging that there are other interpretations of the past in his more recent shows . There are just some things that I think could be improved !