No one proved it was false . They just poked holes in the logic used to draw conclusions . Admittedly , this is easy to do . The information has been spread around in combination with blatantly false pieces being used as part of the proof and all of the conclusions are assumptions at best . That said , they absolutely DID stumble onto something here . Whether what they found is what they think it is has yet to be seen , but their investigation into this is one that I support in full . You don ' t make a case without investigating first , and you don ' t find a smoking gun until you find one . You have to try if you are to ever find anything . The media wants us to believe that there are only two options 1 . Every assumption is correct . 2 . Every single detail is fake . Since # 1 isn ' t true , they propose # 2 has to be the truth . Personally , I deny this logic . It ' s not black or white , in my opinion . It ' s worth looking at the stuff for yourself , it ' s very intriguing . You ' ll see the holes , but you ' ll probably see at least one thing that makes you say Alright , wtf is that .