You could buy nukes in Civ 5 <| sep |> But this whole muh immersion argument is only used by people like you to insult the other side . <| sep |> I agree , it is pointless . For us , now . You were the one suggesting objectively better genes . For some things I think we can justify this a gene that promotes cancerous growths at a young age clearly is detrimental to the organism ' s survival . A set of genes resulting in a mentally severely defunct individual is clearly a bad thing . But is someone that is twice as smart as average ' better ' than someone 1 , 5 x as smart as average ? The question with milk is trivial , because the consequences are trivial . But your suggestion of propagating and eliminating certain genes is most certainly not trivial and should be subject to a lot more scrutiny . Kind of like how I don ' t need a jury of my peers to decide if I am getting milk or not , but there is one when we decide to lock someone up for life or not .