Those infrastructure developments would create even more jobs . And would have economic benefits far into the long term . <| sep |> I wish I had a teacher that engaging when I was doing languages . <| sep |> It makes no sense . I have literally seen millions of women that are both fuckable and lovable . <| sep |> Thanks ! I got the Hitchcock box for $ 35 . <| sep |> I love him <| sep |> I think you ' re veering off into idealism here . And i find it odd that you refer to MIM as mechanical , when they have some of the most outofthebox thinking on many things . There is a difference between RCP maoism , which is just wishy washy on class , and being flexible to changing situations . No I am not veering into idealism at all . In fact this is where we arrive to the difference in line of political economy where the primacy is either with politics or economics . MarxismLeninismMaoism puts primacy of political in the pplitical economy . To suggest otherwise is a different position from MarxismLeninismMaoism . Nothing is static including the consciousness of the labor aristocracy as a class . Because of this MIM is mechanical , and deterministic . More than anything it resembles the mechanical and deterministic political economy of MarxismLeninismMao Thought , which the MIM actually is it is just a rightist deviation of that though . The idealism here that is operative is from the TWist trend that views consciousness as a static thing as opposed to dialectical . And is RCP really the standard of determining what is a good line on class ? Okay , first we defend MIM line , which may or may not be the same thing that you are calling Third Worldist here . Lenin argued that strategic orientation for armed revolutionary struggle must move east , which meant away from Europe and the imperialist countries . I don ' t see disagreements between MIM line and Lenin here . Now you ' re just changing the subject and furthermore you are wrong . Lenin is clear that Communists within imperialist countries must organize for armed struggle . He even says things that Communists must turn imperialist war into civil war . There is a total disagreement because while Lenin says that revolution has a tendency to occur in the semifeudal , semicolonial countries because they present the weakest links in the imperialist system Lenin outright advocates for revolution in the imperialist countries .