Thank you for helping ! So as the neg , your argument isn ' t necessarily that , for example , there aren ' t cyber threats , it ' s that you approach those threats incorrectly . The aff ' s evidence tries to predict and understand other actors instead of actually engaging and building understanding off how people actually act . Evidence like that is harmful because its security rhetoric , and security rhetoric is the very thing that leads us to war . So if the Aff said We have evidence that says its a threat , I response with ? I ' m not sure if I ' m understanding you right . <| sep |> ah . So does it come with the weapon then and it ' s just not working because . . . buggy ? Is there any known way to get it to function or an I stuck with energy weapons ?