The internet is serious business <| sep |> Yes , I know , what I am saying is that there ' s a chance that guy is not lying . I didn ' t try to argue in favor of one or another . <| sep |> uh . there ' s no exagerration there at all . The Average NFL career is 3 . 3 years , and the vast majority of NFL players incur a TBI at some point in their career . <| sep |> I would have included zerkers in the calcs , but I think you ' re right regardless . I ' m not going to redo the math , but the spreadsheet I have set up shows that , without headshots , the IE build crushes the RFC build in terms of pure AA damage . Maybe adding headshots sways it a bit of course , but not to that extent there ' s a difference of about 20 % in damage pre headshotsWhere it becomes tricky is factoring in the RFC proc . Still generally doesn ' t matter much , but depending on how many procs you get and enemy armour vs MR as RFC is magic damage it can make a difference . Vs high armour low MR targets RFC can matterBut generally , in terms of damage I think you ' re right . RFC has advantage in terms of more MS , and the burstrange of RFC , but the IE build wins in terms of theoretical AA damage