telling me it will get here dec . 6 th on bb , and amazon says nov 29 th . i don ' t think my 15 rewards points on best buy are worth waiting a week to play the game . <| sep |> Damn , thanks haha <| sep |> Xabi Alonso was not found guilty of anything . Learn the difference between tax avoidance and tax fraud . Casillas didn ' t commit tax fraud . <| sep |> Oxycodone and Dilaudid . My tolerance allowed me to experience the euphoria while still keeping my motor skills . I was often in a god complex state of mind when I was using heavily <| sep |> My apologies if the tone have offended you as it was not my intention . I said probably trolling as in my view your reply seemed to presume that there is some sort of government in Bitcoin like in a Central bank that is in charge of making policies . That kind of absurd ideas are popular at the rbtc echochamber , where some people seem to think that AXA is governing Bitcoin and we need to put the BU Federation in charge instead . The reality is that there is no one governing a descentralized permissionless system like Bitcoin . From the point of view of the sofware , the 1 MB limit is no different of the 21 M limit philosophically yes , but this is irrelevant here Both are consensus rules and as such both define Bitcoin , because after all Bitcoin is a consensus system there is either consensus between all the peers or there is not you cannot have some sort of compromise in that it is about having a bitexact state of the world , not a sociological construct . In this sense , things like policy or artificial scarcity equally apply to the one or the other . Now , of course , it is probably easier to get the required unanimous consensus to change the 1 MB limit than it is to change the 21 M limit . It needs unanimous consensus , because it essentially means that we collectively agree to let the current Bitcoin die , and we boot up a new Bitcoin a new set of rules from its last state . If we fail to have such nearunanimity , we may end up with a valuedamaging split .