I ' m taking an intro to Native American studies class right now and that ' s the first thing I thought when I saw this game on <| sep |> Sara Luvv Border Patrol SexSOURCE FULL VIDEO viximporn . eu 20161125 m o f ossaraluvvborderpatrolsex <| sep |> Creo que los lo llaman lo mismo in Espaol . <| sep |> That ' s awesome . Just wow <| sep |> And Vermont , Hawaii , Wyoming , Idaho . see where I ' m going with this ? Bernie would lose by an even bigger margin if we didn ' t count deep blue and deep red states . Exactly , states like Vermont and Hawaii are as solidly blue as California . To win , we need the nominee to be the best performer in the states that are likely going to matter , not who is going to win the popular vote across the nation . Sanders was clearly not a good candidate to try to win Florida , but he may have had a better shot at Michigan . Florida ' s influence may be confined more to itself , rather than Essential states are going to change every cycle and against every opponent , especially when we are looking at candidates as different as Trump or McCain . Hillary won Ohio , Pennsylvania , North Carolina and Florida by double digits . Not just kinda close , really big margins . But she still lost all 4 states in the general election . There are more factors to look into at than just a binary wonlost for a state . Each one has context that needs to be examined . Obama wasn ' t even on Michigan ' s ballot . Open or closed primary . Population size . Yes , Hillary won Iowa , but in the context it was 0 . 29 % win against a virtually unknown candidate . She had every advantage going into that race , yet O ' Malley took roughly double of the gap between the two . Her stumbling there likely indicated weak performance in Iowa , which she lost to Trump by 10 %, the first time a Democrat significantly lost the state since 1984 against an incumbent Reagan .