I don ' t think that ' s what they mean . I think it was more along the lines of online DRM and whether our operating systems and hardware will support then in , say , 30 years . But I might be completely wrong too haha <| sep |> e x citedAnnathatsmyfetishgod 16 . gif <| sep |> They asked me why I haven ' t asked out , daughter of family friend . She is 17 and a sophomore in high school . I am 20 . No thanks . <| sep |> Hallelujah by Leonard Cohen <| sep |> Wow that is one hell of a way to kill my sex drive <| sep |> Can Siri use Google Maps instead of Apple Maps ? <| sep |> Well I didn ' t say that , first of all my sentence is constructed so as to make two claims a Francis has been tackling phariseeism , and b everyone pretends to be confused . Now , are they pretending to be confused in order to protect their own phariseeism from the pangs of conscience that Francis ' s prophetic words should be confronting it with ? Well , that ' s an interesting theory you ' ve posited and I ' ll consider it . Certainly the dubia seem insincere inasmuch as everyone knows Francis ' s answer is that some divorced and remarried living more uxori without annulment may be able to receive on a case by case basis since he doesn ' t like categorical exclusions of anyone , and that the justification involved would be the internal forum of conscience . A lot of people aren ' t comfortable with that , but at this point in the game it ' s clear . Like , people can read between the lines and I don ' t think anyone really believes Francis holds the conservative approach . So feigning confusion to try to get a hard rule in an area where Francis ' s whole point is that there are no hard rules in the internal forum . seems disingenuous . And the way that the explanations to the questions already seem to provide answers or arguments in favor of a specific answer . suggests these aren ' t really genuine doubts at all , so much as issues they already have their set opinion on and are just looking to trap Francis into saying something explicit that they could formally condemn or something like that . Like , these Cardinals clearly already know what they think the answers to these questions are . And they ' re not stupid I ' m sure it ' s not merely a matter of someone just needing to explain better to these 70 yearold career churchmen how the argument from internalforum works . No , it ' s pretty clear they ' re aware of that logic , know it ' s the logic confirmed by the Pope , but are choosing to reject it anyway .