Right , that ' s why I said They are really dangerous , but really tempting to throw in fires . I guess I should have said While really tempting to throw into fires , it is very dangerous to do so . That would have been nearly impossible to misunderstand . Also are you comparing a rock to a pound of easily burning , potentially explosive manufactured fuel ? <| sep |> But the graveyard isn ' t even that horrible <| sep |> Hahah hindi , it ' s a normal day in the office . Just another work day . Yung flight namin dito lang , local sa Jeddah . Engines are starting . Gotta go ! <| sep |> What exactly is a mandate and why is it important ? <| sep |> As a middleaged woman , I seriously just don ' t get it . At all . 😒 <| sep |> for power generation coal and natural gas only , CCS seems to be the only somewhat ' cost effective ' solution . What it does is capture the CO 2 emitted from burning coalnatural gas , then store it underground , but this process requires quite a bit of energy which it takes from the power plant attached to it . which means slightly more fuel will need to be burned for the same output of electricity to the market . The cost of setting this up ranges generally from 5080 % extra of the coal plant itself , so if a coal plant costs 300 $ Million , the same plant w CCS will likely cost 450550 $ Million . But the benefit is extremely lowered emission rates , so from lets say 800 kg CO 2 eMWh produced down to the 80200 kg CO 2 eMWh range .