FUCK OH GOD WHY WAS I BORN INTO MY FAMILY WHY DID I AGREE TO GOING ? WHY CANT I HAVE SOMEBODY ELSES FAMILY TO BE A PART OF THIS YEAR ? SAVE ME ! <| sep |> I would because I enjoyed Suicide Squad . Question is . would he do another based on how WB treated him ? I wonder what their relationship is like these days . <| sep |> I was in the other room and thought the sound on my TV had broken <| sep |> Yeah , I ' ll give it a go . Thanks for answering ! <| sep |> another two kinds of osu players meme <| sep |> It ' s highly unlikely that a bank will open an account for a visiting alien though RBI allows it or at least it used to . <| sep |> KZ ' s test won ' t be some tests conducted by her employees behind closed does with no access to the state to view the the testing or have it video taped . There will be a strong and clearly documented chain of custody of the evidence through every step of the process . And if protocol is broken the results will be thrown out . I may have missed a few things , but that ' s about as good as it gets . Contrast that to the testing done in the SA trial . 1 . Testing done by employees of state prosecuting him not independent 3 rd party as in KZ tests . 2 . Access to have representatives reserve tests or to have them video taped denied to the defense . Contrast to video taping AND representatives from boths sides able to observe tests in KZ tests . 3 . Poorly documented chain of custody with few pictures and little to no video documentation and no accountability for lapses in established chain of custody procedures by state in SA trial . Plenty of opportunities in holes in chain of custody to fabricate results . Contrast to strict chain of custody procedures to be observed from reception of evidence to return of evidence in KZ testing including extensive photography and video tape . Testing parties held legally accountable by contract for lapses in chain of custody procedures . 3 . Loose adherence to testing protocols which were not best in industry to begin with in SA testing . Tests with deviations from protocol were used . Contrast to strict adherence to testing protocols that are best in industry with any tests with deviations from protocols to be thrown out and not used in KZ testing . 3 . Testing done by average at best technicians with exception of EDTA test with varying degrees of education and training but none that were world class in SA case . Contrasts to testing done by world class experts with extensive education in KZ testing . I ' ll leave off here , though I could continue . It would have take some effort to fabricate test results in the SA trial . It would be like hitting the broadside of a barn at 400 yards with a sniper rifle with laser range finder and sited scope . I know people that would miss that shot . With KZ testing , it would be possible to fabricate test results . However it would be like hitting a quarter taped to the broad side of the barn at 2500 yards with no range finder and iron sites . Possible , but I ' ve never personally met anyone who would have even a 1 % chance of making that shot .