Minyak naik rm 0 . 10 esok <| sep |> Honestly man , this is totally awesome . My potholders are starting to wear out , and I would love a raiders one . Kind of jelly , but more just psyched that your team has your back like that ! <| sep |> Some beautiful 2 d games on sale right now , that I believe would be perfect for the GPD Win undertale , hyperlight drifter , hotline miami , super meat boy , Owlboy , terraria , broforce , shantae and pirates curse , bastion , Binding of isaac , Dust an elysian tail , shovel knight , vvvvvpoint and click Machinarium , monkey islandseries <| sep |> Boobs can definitely change after college . <| sep |> He ' s admin . What if he gilded himself ? I can ' t trust anything on this site man <| sep |> Ah , quoting WSJ . didn ' t WSJ retract that ? That seems to be a trigger happy twitter handler . That is not less easy to prove , just google the names of the people speaking and the education level of the anchors themselves . When you do that you will see their background and where they are coming from . They are usually from conservative think tanks or insignificant conservative groups that give the exact answer you knew they would just based on the organization they are a part . That ' s not enough to conclude that their news is worthless , you ' d have to go and analyze their news overall , taking a cross section and then looking at how they frame it . I don ' t expect you to do it , and I believe we ' d get that result you just described , butyou would know absurd your position would appear . My position is agreeing with yours . I just don ' t want you to use the reasoning that all their anchors are from conservative backgrounds or just listen to it as conclusive reasoning , even if it ' s strong supporting context .