Pretty sure support is open today but on shortened hours . You can try again , they should be able to get the order cancelled . <| sep |> But that underscore is a bitch sometimes . <| sep |> Telling students to just accept dogma and to research proof of it on their own initiative if they are interested is literally not being a professor . That isn ' t how education works . Call her out on being an imposter . <| sep |> Ill check the facts it might be true . <| sep |> Good points , and I go back and forth on the idea , but ultimately l think it ' s a good one . First of all , most people would vote if they had to actually get their asses to the voting station that ' s kind of the point of this or of mandatory voting . If people have a genuine aversion to voting for moral or other reasons though , I ' m quite happy to let them say no . Most of the people who vote are already woefully ignorant of the issues . By saying you don ' t GET to not have an opinion ! people may actually inform themselves a bit . In other words , it ' s easy to say I don ' t know and I don ' t care , and am doing nothing . the apathy nonvote . It ' s also fairly easy to say I don ' t know and I don ' t care so I ' ll vote for my party ' s guy . the ignorant partyline vote . Saying ' you must get to the polling station ' will likely shift most of the first group into the second which is not a good thing as you point out but if we have a system like STVMMP , then the voter has no choice but to pick a number of candidates and maybe a party , which may be a high enough level of complexity to force people to learn something . Put another way , the act of voting under STVMMP is complex enough that voters will have a hard time even throwing away a vote without some grasp of what they ' re saying .