Well timed <| sep |> You have so fundamentally missed the point that I ' m going to have to construct a hyperdrive to get you back . Here goes . That may be their views but they aren ' t attacking homosexuals etc and respect the law of the country they live in . That ' s not in question . I used these statistics to show that mainstream British Islamic culture is still not compatible with our liberal western values and that artificially protecting these ideas from criticism is harmful , not helpful . If an idea is so fragile it needs special protection from criticism , then chances are it ' s a bad idea . Why is it when the racists say something appalling theres always people there to defend them under the freedom of speech but when certain non white groups voice whatever their opinions are wrong or right nobody defends their right to say whateverHi , I ' m FoolishBob . I defend the right of all groups to voice whatever opinion they please and will criticise all equally because of it . Nice to meet you . The right to hold or express an idea does not shield that idea from criticism . Britain first , edl . that ' s fineWhat are you reading that makes you think that it ' s fine for them to say these things ? Britain First and the EDL are literal pariahs in society . Their ideas are soundly rejected . That ' s literally the opposite of what you ' re saying . If they attack them . that ' s fine and totally not part of some global islamaphobic movementSeriously , cancel your subscription to Stormfront or at least read some other publications . By what metric can you possibly conclude that physical attacks on Muslims is seen as fine ? Once again reality is literally the opposite of what you are saying . As to why people say that Islam is a global movement and racists aren ' t , here ' s the reason . Muslims claim to be part of a global movement Racists do not claim to be part of a global movement it ' s also interesting that you mentioned rotherham but racists never link being white with those mentioned in yewtreeYou ' re kidding right ? Ok , so the Rotherham attacks were allowed to happen specifically because of the race of the attackers . It was explicitly listed as the cause . The for want of a better term Yewtree attacks were allowed to happen specifically because of the celebrity of the attackers . It was explicitly listed as the cause . Celebrity is not race . Please tell me you understand that Aside from that point , though , the reason I mention Rotherham was that you asserted that people overrepresent the bad things done by Muslims . Reality , however , tends to be the literal opposite of what you think it is there ' s a pattern developing here , and my point was that the way we know this to be true is that Rotherham could never have happened without there being a practice to underrepresent the bad things done by Muslims . I also find it hard to imagine all muslims in britain were polled for that studyAnd now you ' re just getting desperate . I ' m sure you know that ' s not how statistics work , or are you really saying that if the science of man contradicts gospel truth then it is the science of man that is wrong ?