When I use to house sit for neighbours they just tell me to go in their house , walk around check stuff twice a week for insurance reasons . <| sep |> Hey guess what I love Claude Giroux . <| sep |> Yeah , I remember last time , apart for funding transit , the Liberals didn ' t really have much I was interested in , but oh god the other parties . <| sep |> Amen . I always thought chicken and biscuits were normal for breakfast until ChickfilA started running those ads about how it ' s such a breakthrough <| sep |> You say There are persons who have no money , and you turn to the law . But the law is not a breast that fills itself with milk . Nor are the lacteal veins of the law supplied with milk from a source outside the society . Nothing can enter the public treasury for the benefit of one citizen or one class unless other citizens and other classes have been forced to send it in . If every person draws from the treasury the amount that he has put in it , it is true that the law then plunders nobody . But this procedure does nothing for the persons who have no money . It does not promote equality of income . The law can be an instrument of equalization only as it takes from some persons and gives to other persons . When the law does this , it is an instrument of plunder . With this in mind , examine the protective tariffs , subsidies , guaranteed profits , guaranteed jobs , relief and welfare schemes , public education , progressive taxation , free credit , and public works . You will find that they are always based on legal plunder , organized injustice .