Also standard in Switzerland <| sep |> The system is rigged and has been for some time . <| sep |> That ' s sexy . Wish I could join you <| sep |> OK , I think I understand the reasoning now . Well , I think it is indeed a good indication that all truths are not knowable , but isn ' t it a result that Godel already expressed ? <| sep |> It used to be completely legal to shoot a Welshman in the city of York . Three provisos it had to be with a crossbow , it had to be after midnight , and it had to be within the city walls . My welsh friend never wanted to go to York for the weekend with me , for some reason . <| sep |> of course . that is why there is soo much , eat til food coma , mmmmhmm . ponkeatsherowntail <| sep |> Without going back and rereading everything I believe this discussion started off with the impact the forthcoming recreational legislation might have on medical users pertaining to shipping through Canada Post . My response was along the lines that if laws were changed to give police services the right to intercept packages without a warrant there will no doubt need to be an easy way for Canada Post to differentiate between packages shipped from a licensed producer to a legal medical user and packages shipped to recreational users from unapproved sources . Then I went into hypothetical methods of differentiation , as simple as the return address electronic address scanning is already in place so it is not as impractical as it sounds a barcode affixed to the package that would exclude it from further examination enroute , or an RFID chip which would do the same thing . I ' m sure there are lots of other ways to do this as well because Canada Post has a very efficient electronic package sorting and scanning system in place . If there ' s a barcode on the package that says to the system this is from a licensed producer to a legal medical user do not send for secondary screening then that ' s what law enforcement will be bound by because the last thing the government wants to do is cause problems for medical users . Imagine the lawsuits if somebody with PTSD has a meltdown because they ' ve run out of medication because it was delayed in transit by the police . They ' re going to want to avoid that and it ' s a relatively easy amendment to make to the existing legislation if it ' s even necessary . So if we got off track this is what I started out with . Not making changes to the medical system but finding a way to ensure that medical users are not negatively impacted by any changes going on with Canada Post pertaining to recreational legislation . The obvious negative impact would be legal users having their packages delayed because there ' s no way to differentiate between legal shipments and illegal shipments . If that ' s a problem that requires an amendment to the legislation covering medical cannabis then I have no doubt that is what they will do .