What so are you getting the headaches from the RDA or from the Tank ? <| sep |> Why fish but not clam ? <| sep |> or , they would just start taking advantage of all the oil they have there , like Norway does . <| sep |> Tomb Pillager , Swash Burglar , Undercity Huckster . Skulker and Raptor weren ' t bad either . <| sep |> I finished the MR 18 test Corpus Defence and can confirm that while the waves do end , they ' re really , really long compared to regular Defence . <| sep |> AYO MA that shit looks nice deadass B <| sep |> Wow , good response . I ' ll quote a few fragments and respond . The MBTI IS an attempt at creating some order to the Jungian cognitive functionsI understand that it ' s an attempt , but a very minimal one . I ' m not aware of any empirical evidence , or much of a theory even , showing how Jung ' s specific functions can be illuminated through the use of the MBTI it is simply presumed . The work of Dario Nardi is the best stab at it , but his test subjects were asked to use a variety of sources to selfappraise their own overall type . . There ' s a mountain of data and pseudoevidence . that people use a ' dominant ' function in their day to day lives , and that a second function ala auxilliary sits behind it in its opposite form . I agree that people at times identify with having a primary , auxiliary etc function , and I don ' t think that requires taking an MBTI test , and I ' m a pretty strong believer in the notion of Jung ' s functions and the superiorinferior duality . Again though , it takes a huge leap to connect the general reliability of an MBTI tests outcome with ascribed function arrangement for most people who take the test . Is there any accurate clinical data showing how often people who take the test accept the existence of the functions that the result suggests ? Even if there were , I believe that foundational bias would be a huge problem . If the data you might suggest is anecdotal , the problem with judging whether people from a forum feel that their actual dominant function correlates to what their MBTI result suggests , is that this doesn ' t account for coincidental findings being overrepresented . In another words , if 99 percent of who take an MBTI feel the proposed dominant function their test result entails doesn ' t correlate to the dominant function they most relate to , they might lose faithinterest , leave the community forum , and thus exclude their opinion from being considered by an observer . All in all , I think there is tons of interesting , and quite scientific , research about the MBTI as a clinical instrument , and I think the theoretical work of Jung ' s mental functions is also highly interesting . I just feel that they are artificially related at this point .