Probably best to use Gimp until then . <| sep |> This is true and it is sad people are down voting this . You ' re all fucked . <| sep |> ToS became shit after the latest update . <| sep |> thanks , im definitely going to lie down and do that later . I ' ve already had the 400 mg so oh well . dexcalc . com recommended 392 mg for 135 lbs so that ' s what i went with . I started drinking like 30 minutes ago and finished maybe 10 minutes ago , so I still have a while before I ' m high <| sep |> I ' m not impressed by prestigious jargonI don ' t think I suggested you should be . I referred only to the logic being brought to bear and your extremely flippant dismissal of it . As to your counter example . it ' s actually not a counterexample , it ' s in support of the claim , so I don ' t understand what you thought you had demonstrated . Once again , let ' s review the final line The ally of the view that all truths are knowable by somebody is forced absurdly to admit that every truth is known by somebody . emphasis mineThis is not a claim that every truth is known . It is quite the opposite . Hell , that ' s one of the givens , stated in colloquial english at the start of the proof ! This proof might use a number of symbolic representations of logical formalisms , but you can at least read the text if you don ' t know logical notation . an argument from prestigious jargon that is purposefully confusingIf you think that that ' s purposefully confusing , then I ' m kind of confused , myself . This is dumbed down and explained at every step in colloquial language for a general audience . The actual proof was likely much more complex and devoid of the common sense explanations such as I ' ve quoted above . Are you just being intimidated by the symbolic modal logic ? If so , just ignore it . It ' s certainly helpful in understanding , but not strictly necessary .