I would recommend watching VHS as well <| sep |> DOWNVOTE THIS MAN <| sep |> The idea is interesting . But I don ' t agree that the picks are obvious with the current system . Drafting sites usually make you pretty good decks but there is still a lot of room for improvement and even human players have alot to consider like curve , archetype , synergy . <| sep |> This is England . <| sep |> You did a good thing . Do us a favour , though stay away from the gym for a while . Gains are important , sure , but we wouldn ' t want to see any unfortunate incidents with barbells take place . <| sep |> No , dictators have done everything in their power to destroy constitutions and wipe their rears with them . There is a difference . Without having any constitution at all , however , it makes it even easier to take over look what happened with the Caesars . Britain , traditionally , has been a monarchy and for most of its history and absolute monarchy . Up until WWII you were classified as subjects , not citizens . Until the 17 th century a monarch could do anything he wanted to you and you had no way to fight back . Then the Bill of Rights was written . Unfortunately , the Whigs did not take the next step and define once and for all the rights of the citzen and the responsibilities of government . Several of the headaches of the following two centuries could have been avoided if they had . And today , you would not be required to never turn your back on Queen Elizabeth nor financially support her . The problems come not from having a constitution itself , but when men abuse it or ignore it . Cannot change quickly or respond to the times ? The last big changes were in the 60 s , thank you . And the last big challenge was actually in 2015 , with gay marriage . It challenged the 14 th Amendment . The next ones will likely challenge laws funding of elections , banking , healtcare , taxes , and the electoral college as new constitutional amendments . America was never intended to have a formal aristocracy and right now that is being fought ruthlessly over from the local pub to the Senate floor because of public anger that it is turning into one , where the people have less and less say . Many of the things you point out were conducted without public knowledge or input . The UK still technically has an aristocracy whose rights have come before that of the average man and has never had a situation where the commoner finally had enough and successfully overthrew the bastards . I would wager that some in Parliament never give creedence to the fact that it could go much worse than a simple protest outside Westminster when there is public dissent . Or that they could wind up shot for screwing the people over one time too many since they take their security for granted . What ? The people are revolting ? Yes , yes Nigel , I already knew that . No , we are not leaving . Why are you running ? But they can ' t . It cannot be ! How did they manage to rob a special police unit of its rifles ? ! What do you mean , they ' ve burned down my mansion ? ! I will be frank you look like fools to the rest of the world . It is like wearing a member ' s only jacket when you are the last living member . Enshrining English common law simply because it is English common law as the greatest protection is ironically the same type of sin you accuse Americans of . but Americans can point to the fact that at the very least we don ' t have to memorize huge volumes of tomes just to know what the law is at its most basic . We can go down to the green , dig a little hole , plant a black walnut tree , and be assured that the cop cannot arrest us as everybody and his mama knows it is public grounds . You and your complex system guarantees that you can be convicted on an obscure law written in medieval French that only a barrister would know . It ' s funny , really her title is QC , QUEEN ' S counsel , not citizen ' s . The onus should be on the individual , not the state . Leaving the state to be trusted to obey its own laws can be a dangerous game .