I don ' t use drugs , barely drink , don ' t go to the casino but I might drop 20 bucks a year on lotto . I usually get half back . Some years I have made 20 . It ' s just fun dream <| sep |> That ' s why I want teddy back healthy . <| sep |> SHUT IT DOWN <| sep |> Happy Thanksgiving homie , don ' t stop fighting the good fight . Be easy , stay safe , and enjoy all that life still has to offer . <| sep |> Just wait a week . Zombies would be too stiff from rigor Morris to be a threat . <| sep |> Still , if I get on any rocket I would hope it was the Soyuz . That thing has a strong history of reliability . <| sep |> That ' s probably not the only sub they have done this too . <| sep |> Or at the very least have our problems addressed . The very nature of the game means there simply can ' t be equality between all players , but I ' m 100 % certain there ' s a solution to make the game more fair or at the very least make rural living more fun than it currently is . Asymmetric games can be balanced and fair , but the two different types of gameplay wouldn ' t necessarily be equal . Am I arguing semantics ? Idk , I think you can say that making the game equal for all players means it ' s the exact same game in the city as it is in the country , where as balancing it asymmetrically would be to say we can ' t make more spawns and pokestops in rural areas but we can give the areas a specific buff . Maybe they implement like a Pokemon ranch buff for areas certain distances from any pokestop where you get more candies or even stardust from walking buddies or having multiple buddies walking at once . Something like that would say that rural areas are for raising Pokemon while urban areas are for catching them . Of course , niantic would need to understand the basics of game design before implementing more complex aspects like asymmetric gameplay .