Yeah , it ' s so cute how urbanites who ' ve never so much as visited a farm or taken a road trip , and maybe grow some potted herbs in their kitchen think they ' ll be able to feed themselves on a 20 x 20 patch of dirt . Especially the ones living anywhere north of 40 degrees . <| sep |> he asks someone in his team to pick a melee carry or offlaner like void , and together they rape . <| sep |> That fucking smug face on that dude . <| sep |> Hyvn pelin nappasit , onnea pelin pariin ! Toivottavasti lytyy pelikavereita mys jatkossa , kommunikointi suuressa roolissa kun oppii pelaamaan <| sep |> Meh . I don ' t think it ' s out in left field that when someone disputes the applicability of some scientific findings to ask whether they actually have contrary scientific findings backing them up . Indeed , they might very well have such an interesting article . Said article might not be conclusive and hence might lead to I think at the start . The right answer is to respond No , I ' m just using common sense and let it go at that , instead of trying to argue that one arrived at the conclusion via a scientific process , if someone asks you in rscience whether you ' re being scientific in your opinion or not .