They also say it was not random . They seem to be contradicting themselves . Maybe it was a typo . <| sep |> Oh hoff , dat pass . Oh stone , dem moves . <| sep |> Got them in today and well my hype was killed pretty quickly . Loose joints and loose ball joints galore and the hands seem a bit small and the paint on them isn ' t that good . Hopefully other people who ordered these figures don ' t have these issues . <| sep |> Beer belly , back hair . <| sep |> Hell no . First amendment covers me and my fellow Americans to wear whatever we want . If my fucking neighbour wanted to wear Klan costumes , more power to him . Why should I restrict his freedom to wear what he wants ? <| sep |> I believe a significant problem with your argument is that you seem to assume that there is a perfect system . I recognize that you said , the core of my argument is . NOT that my suggestion is the perfect system . But if there is no significantly better option , then there is no need for an overhaul , regardless of how bad the current system is . The problems you highlight are that politicians aretoo easily influenced by corruption and that those making very impactful decisions are not the most qualified to do soThe likelihood that a politician becomesis corrupt should be something that makes heshe more or less qualified . So the first point is part of the second . We already have democratic elections for the politicians . When the people vote , they are voting on who is the most qualified to make the right decisions . According to you , the ideal politician is intelligent , ethical , incorruptible and selfless . These qualities are highly subjective . Intelligent A prodigy in one field can be incredibly stupid in another . Ethical Ethical mean being moral and making moral decisions . But who decided what is morally correct ? Take abortion , when does it turn from a clump of cells into a human ? At conception ? At birth ? Somewhere inbetween ? Where inbetween ? Someone who is ethical to one might be killing thousands according to another . Incorruptible while many claim to be , there is an extremely small number of people who are totally incorruptible if any and it is pretty much impossible to tell before they are actually in power . Selfless again , incredibly difficult to discern from the public ' s eye . And who would decide who to elect ? Who would choose who makes the decisions ? The best option for this is the people . The US is a government for the people and by the people . When we vote , we are already choosing who we think is the most qualified to be in power . There is no government that is 100 % immune to corruption even in theory . Just because you think someone is corrupt doesn ' t mean many , many other people thought they were to most qualified to have power .