So , being a skeptic is now jumping to a preconceived notion ? Considering all the evidence contrary to your stance , I ' d say it borders on irrationality at the worst , and simple misguided skepticism at best . Being skeptical is fine , remaining skeptical in spite of decades of research and data that goes against what you believe is borderline dogmatic . The fuck are you smokingNothing , just coffee in the morning and a light drink on holidays . I would bother to provide you sources of individual scientists that don ' t agree that climate change is predominantly because of human activity , but you actually managed to annoy meLol , okay . I ' d provide sources , but I won ' t provide sources . I ' m sure they wouldn ' t be scientists involved with the oil industry , much like the scientists Clair Patterson had to deal with when lead totally wasn ' t bad for people . Of course I have no way of knowing , since you won ' t source anything . You obviously let partisanship cloud your logic and skepticism . No amount of sources or arguments I would present would cause you to even ask a single question about your positionSomething something pot , something something kettleWTF do you expect to be done to fix thatI ' m a socialist , so ideally stop treating people as unequal within the workplace and give the workers control over the production and distribution of what they produce , rather than attaching subjective value to their labor based on different decisions which by the way , what the fuck does that even mean ? Two people hired at the same job at the same position , one is paid less because she ' s female . Is being female a different decision ? It ' s not about fighting the patriarchy , it ' s about basic common decency .