love your hands <| sep |> How is Nvidia which developed a technology to benefit themselves and the consumer the same as Oculus who are paying developers to keep games exclusive to what ' s essentially a display device ? Oculus developed VR technology to benefit consumer , Nvidia developed GSync to benefit consumer . Oculus restricts its funded games to its own headset , Nvidia restricts GSync to own cards and module . They developed their technology , other companies developed their own technology and they ' re actively sabotaging other companies and themselves to try and push them out of the market . Nvidia developed their own technology , AMD developed their own technology , and Nvidia did nothing afterwards , yet they are as bad as Oculus ? Nvidia did nothing afterwards is repeated reason . The answer is from the getgo GSync was already anticonsumer by being restricted to its own cards and expensive module . Freesync is not an open standard . Displayport adaptive sync is . Secondly , Nvidia already implements that on laptops . Since I got the pedantic out of the way , they could do it , but they don ' t , therefore they ' re anti consumer isn ' t a valid argumentFreesync is . Nvidia restricting GSync to own cards and own expensive modules is definitely anticonsumer . There was only one choice if you wanted the benefits then , and it was pricey . because you can push that level of logic to any point . They should also make all of their drivers open source and cut all of the prices in half , they should also let all other companies use their patents , otherwise they ' re anticonsumer . That . escalated strangely . Nvidia at the minimum supporting Freesync does not equate it giving away its patents . Ahh , those poor adaptive sync customers , suffering from evil Nvidia who refuses to do anything to ease their suffering . Back in reality , no one is suffering and some people think their purchase of Graphics cards are restricted by the existence of monitors which isn ' t really true because the monitors don ' t actually restrict you to a single vendor . Of course they do , people buy adaptivesync monitors exactly for the functionality , of course they have to use the GPUs that support the specific sync tech . And you have to buy the Founder ' s Edition ? Did you even read what I wrote ? But they don ' t . They don ' t have to buy the FE . If they wanted the performance in early Fall they had to pay Nvidia ' s FE premium because demandsupply and partner cards sold out first .