I am losing my shit . <| sep |> yeah i agree <| sep |> Those pipes right behind have got be bouncing off the walls . I put our servers in the basement for a week and had a pipe leak all over them . Homeowner ' s insurance covered it and everything was backed up , but it was not a fun experience . <| sep |> Nice try with the trollish insult . It ' s not helping your argument here . Why even bother with the pointless stuff ? You asumed miners drop off in a way that affects hashrate , not I . If you want to say that hashrate will suffer , you have to argue for it properly , not by attempting to put words in my mouth ! You ' re also trying to confuse the issue with LN , by falsely claiming that miners don ' t get any fees from it . At some point channels open and close , and miners get those fees . Thus , lightning will pay miner fees . There are more aggregate transactions made per miner fee received but arguably growth will be sufficient so that the extra value transferred in aggregate will be able to fund miners even better than they are funded now , using the fraction of LN transactions that do hit the blockchain .