ga nou een end heen met je gebrekkig voorstellingsvermogen . ' Pitloze druif ' zeg je als je flauw aan het doen bent , dat is geen boos gescheld . <| sep |> Meh , I picked up Ertz to fill in for me . And I ' m happy with that . I ' m not going to risk Gronk coming back and putting up a 0 like he did coming back against Houston . <| sep |> No problemo , hope you beat them lol <| sep |> ZT 0350 almost started using it to open a beer . I guess this is why we can ' t have nice things . <| sep |> Thanks man ! You too ! <| sep |> You just said yourself what is going to stop them the company going under . Why would you strike if you know the strike is going to leave you unemployed ? You keep assuming that the working class is largely brain dead , as if they ' re all going to suddenly forget that they have bills to pay and families to feed or something . But if it works to get them the first raise in this scenario , how are they supposed to know when enough is enough ? Do you honestly think that the average wage worker knows the exact number that their labor is worth to the company ? How would they know at what point they are getting the best wage that they can without collapsing the company ? I ' m not assuming they ' re brain dead nice strawman though , I ' m assuming most wage workers don ' t know the bottom line that their time is worth to their company . And even if they did know , many people would stubbornly ask for more , in the face of opposing basic economic principles . And there is nothing the company could do , other than capitulate even at their own peril . So pass a law preventing such tactics if it becomes a problem . This is a red herring . So at what point is a company allowed to hire or fire someone ? You seem to be in favor of allowing the government to dictate exactly under which terms people are allowed to work . Is this the end goal ? Government control of private business ?