That means that you ' re really far behind ! Catch up ! <| sep |> Here ' s a prime example . A Golden State Warrior ' s Cheerleader that supposedly in the Phoenix area ? ?<| sep |> Nice collection , but i think your better off selling them individually <| sep |> I ' m sort of seeing your point on why it ' d be needed , but if a person isn ' t accepting someone ' s transition , wouldn ' t there be a lot more done than just using the wrong pronouns ? And then wouldn ' t that be covered by the discrimination laws we already have ? ~~ I ' m not against having something in place to protect against this kind of behaviour , but I ' m confused on why a standalone piece of legislation would be needed rather than saying , The laws we that apply on the basis of race , gender and sexuality include transgender as part of sexuality . ~~ Edit hold on , someone just connected the dots for me that this pretty much is what the bill is doing , and that ' s connected other dots for me on why one of this professor ' s arguments is that , related to gender identity and expression , refusing to use other pronouns should not be considered hate speech which I think is a tldr of what the main debate is about . Makes a lot more sense . Thanks for your patience , everybody !