That ' s true . I hope that ' s the case . <| sep |> I call you a safer to goad you into not eating so I can kill you <| sep |> Seems like a hacked account maybe . <| sep |> You got me there ! Lol <| sep |> So the simplest way to explain this is by reiterating the statement I made at the start of my post . I only need to push 14 face damage with Nat , Mukla , Elise , the Juggernaut ' s body , and the Golden Monkey , because I have 16 direct damage . To put that in perspective , that means if Nat and Mukla are unanswered for two turns , I win the game , given that no one in my group brought heals or taunts with the exception of one Reno , which I beat as explained . Especially in the Shadowform matchups , I am very much trying to rush down my opponent , as their infinite value means I can ' t possibly outlast them . The strongest of the Shadowform decks is 13 , considering it can get rolling very early and trade for my big threats unless I specifically use Leeroy to kill the Garrison Commander . I explained this fully . Deck 5 is one of the easiest matchups in the group . Yes , he can use a coinedout Shade and both bananas to kill Mukla , but once he loses his Shade he also loses one of his only ways to kill me . His only other repetitive damage is the 42 from the weapon , which dies to whichever of my minions is alive at the time . His only play would be to wipe my board with double Elemental Destruction before the Hammer ' s deathrattle triggers , but as long as I hold Elise and in turn the Monkey until after that happens , one of them will trade for the 42 . All of this is done disregarding my opponent ' s life bar , which if not already zero would drop below zero while trying to clear my last minions with the Doomhammer . For the future , I understand your potential concerns about scoring , but you might want to consider the reasons for calling people out on their lines . I also realize I set a bit of a standard , considering I was the first to post on round 9 . 1 and specifically included these explanations . A lot of people , especially in seasons 8 and earlier , simply just posted their scoring lines , no explanations for each matchup . Sometimes I use them to do fun stuff for example , my score with a scumbag aggro deck on round 8 . 2 is . This isn ' t to say you shouldn ' t call people out if you think they scored a matchup incorrectly , the issue is more taking any given explanations as if it ' s a sort of essay or exam and your Please elaborate language further creates this idea . A final thing to consider is that you should play out any matchups you do intend to challenge someone on find a way for the opposite outcome to happen , even with the prior winner still playing optimally . If you can ' t find a way for that to happen , then their score is correct . I hope this doesn ' t come across as rude or angry in any way . The major goal of the last paragraph is to help you avoid confrontation in the future , certainly not cause it now .