I am pleased that we share common goals . However 1 . No foreign person has any constitutional right to become Canadian whatsoever . Canadians have the right to pick who and when we ordain Canadian citizenship . or even visitor status . A CBSA officer has the right to turn any foreigner away because he doesn ' t like the cut of hisher gib . Our constitution has zero relevance beyond our borders . especially so on nonCanadians . I am not concerned with transgressions of 2 nd 3 rd , etc . generation Canadians in this instance . but of immigration applicants for whom our constitution does not apply . 2 . I ' m not interested in having neighbours or compatriots , for that matter who ' s only motivation for not doing unspeakably terrible things female circumcision , dowries , persecutingthreatening apostates are legal repercussions . Such people are morally inferior with respect to the accepted Canadian standard . Our official policy must be to refuse entry . or even recourse , to people who exhibit such immoral and incompatible values . I make no apologies for my utter contempt for moral relativism . 3 . That you feel such a test is impractical doesn ' t relieve the moral imperative to make it happen . Curing infections was considered impractical before Alexander Fleming observed the curative power of the mold on his cheese sandwich . And as it turns out , such a test is practical and is standard kit for other likeminded nations such as the Netherlandsdutch 5852942 . html , where applicants are shown images of men kissing and scantily clad women and asked , under oath , their opinions of such behaviour , with unacceptable answers rendering them ineligible .