Exit polls are not designed to detect election fraud <| sep |> People who have the means to help but will go an entire year and not help a single person <| sep |> Labour progressives are quieter than they ' ve been at any point since Corbyn came to power . It ' s just kinda weird for your argument that we haven ' t seen an uptick in support since then . If anything our numbers have drooped further . Luckily , it is a thesis you can test yourself when door knocking and speaking to people who now won ' t vote Labour , ask them if it ' s the backbenchers criticising Corbyn that stops them from supporting Corbyn . <| sep |> If there was proof . Then I would believe it . But there ' s only evidence . No proof . Outside of mathmatics there is no such thing as proof . Only weighed amount of evidence to make something much more likely the case than not . Lets say I come home , I find my wife and the mailman having sex on the couch . A private investigator gives me photo ' s of the same thing . The mailman admits to it . Now from this scenerio , from the evidence , I can say that it is a safe assumption that my wife is cheating on me . but however rediculously slim the odds are , I lack proof , because there is a slight chance that I had a ministroke and hallucination , and the PI ' s camera may have just happened to have had a weird glitch where somehow the camera had strange artifacts that just happened to look like my wife and the mailman having sex , when it actually was a blank wall , and the mailman may have been lying , or he also happened to have had the same halucination I did . proof does not exist , only evidence that allows us to make assumptions with high levels of accuracy . In many cases degrees of accuracy so off the charts high that it is rediculous not to assume them , especially in exchange for things that we don ' t even know if are even remotely possible .