I get that , but I think you ' re still not getting what I mean . I ' m saying if Norman was never a target in the offseason and there were other options to sign to shore up any other positions that would ' ve been cheaper i . e . sign two or three players with the money instead of one , would it have been more beneficial ? It wasn ' t regarding the timing of signing Norman , just different strategies or priorities in the offseason similar to why Norman was available in the first place since the Panthers weren ' t going to sign him . <| sep |> You ' re growing old ! Some of our posts in our stalling endless debates are orders of magnitude longer . <| sep |> I haven ' t capped anyone with a sawed off since the beta now that I think about it . Hurts .