I wasn ' t being negative . I provided a point of view the would affect design and effectiveness . <| sep |> You ' re a stronger person then I am . Seeing those poor people in their drugstore brands is too heartbreaking for me . 😩 <| sep |> Don ' t try bringing none of that shit to my house ! <| sep |> No wonder your country is so cuckolded <| sep |> I used Cinch and Right Zoom 3 or 4 years ago just to get normal window snapping . BetterTouchTools does that and more . Best money I ' ve ever spent . <| sep |> Why does something need to be strictly worse to be a crap card ? It doesn ' t have to be , but he was replying to the following comment , which was about it being strictly better or not . The 2 mana 23 is obviosuly boring but is it strictly worse ? Having the effect be optional could be good and 23 and 32 are debatable as to which is better obviously still not a good card thoughAnd that was a reply to this commentThere ' s a big difference between bad card and worse version of a neutral card that ' s been in the game since launch . It ' s certainly no better than Brewmaster . How so ? Brewmaster is better for some of the combos , but it ' s worse 90 % of the time . Brewmaster isn ' t played because it ' s literally unplayable from your hand 90 % of the time , not because the effect isn ' t good sometimes , but because it ' s bad a lot of the time . This card has the good effect most of the time without ever needing to have the bad side of the effect . That is not worse , and certainly not strictly worse . The card is still horrible regardless of whether its strictly worse than Brewmaster . It ' s not great , but it ' s not horrible either . But that isn ' t really the point of this comment chain .