screams into pillow <| sep |> Is that the sheboy thing ? <| sep |> That ' s a bingo <| sep |> My daughter <| sep |> England and Scotland . Go on , which one did you prefer ? <| sep |> The dark side . and the light ! <| sep |> My point was always faithless electors have never once changed the election outcome and that still stands . It does still stand , yeah . The thing is , though , while it didn ' t change the election outcome , it did change the election process . The Senate had to select the VP that year rather than the EC doing so as has always happened before and since . If faithless electors come sufficiently into play this year and that ' s a big big if , of course , the election process will change , which has happened before . Once it goes into that contingent election , we ' re all on much shakier ground trying to predict what the outcome will be . I personally feel that if , somehow , it gets to that point and the House is having to elect the president , we will see the first altered outcome as opposed to process stemming from faithless electors ' actions . I don ' t think the House GOP likes Trump enough to vote him in . instead I think at least one faithless elector will vote for a more establishment Republican Kasich , Romney , etc . and the House will rally behind that candidate .