You are very correct ! <| sep |> For the sarubia maybe it ' ll be painted blue and have the future soldier special as a regular attack . As for Donald modern idk XC <| sep |> D dude I ' m 29 and I ' ve played Pokemon blue every few years for the last 18 years . <| sep |> But many networks try to appear to be Talking heads and pundits , maybe but that ' s the nature of argument . Almost any opinion you hear is bound to contain one or more argumentative . If the media were presenting arguments as falsely equivalent , there would be no controversy . It wouldn ' t seem to matter to them which one we decide to believe . The whole purpose of controversy of this kind is to make those decisions of belief important . Often times , there aren ' t actually two sides , and the media falsely bolsters opposing views that are objectively false . Again , what is objectively true and objectively false is not for the media to conclude on our behalf . What you ' re talking about is false controversy , which I described . For instance , if there is no serious debate among professionals about a certain topic , giving air time to someone who disagrees with their consensus achieves two things 1 . it fills air time for 24 hour news networks and sometimes achieves better ratings , depending on the subject matter 2 . it gives a dissenters a voice and a platformThe important thing about # 2 is that sometimes dissenters are right . What people think politically is going to be heavily influenced by what they are shown in the mediaAll the more reason for people to start embracing the art of critical thinking . My personal opinion is that you might want to reconsider your views on philosophy .