Exactly this . Hell , if I was David I ' d be pissed that he made me waste and idol . But ultimately I like both of them and can ' t really blame anyone for their actions . I actually really like most of the people left . They ' re all playing the game to win and they ' re all interesting people and characters . <| sep |> Hahaha slats pulling warne up on ethics . <| sep |> VA offers a higher contrast , meaning images offer more depth , which is more natural than IPS and TN and all the knock offs inbetween . Keep in mind that the source 3 you linked is 5 years old published 13 Sep , 2011 . And also in terms of viewing angles , VA monitor has got basically IPS viewing angles today , where as the TV ' s don ' t , the viewing angles are still not that great there . Not all TV ' s use VA panels , they use IPS and VA , depending on brand . You did some good research , although old article , but seeing is believing . VA wins over IPS today in terms of picture quality , absolutely no doubt about it , be it gaming or movies , the visual quality is much greater , and also a much lower defect ratio . 60 Hz TN panels ghost too . VA panels haven ' t had the chance to show what they ' re made of yet , mainly due to how much the market consumers are in favor of IPS , so not much money and hard to sell something which basically every reviewer and so on are pushing very hard for them . The monitor and TV market are very different though , VA dominates the TV market , where as IPS dominates the monitor market , for no apparent reason in my honest opinion , it should be VAVA if people really want pretty images .