Ramsey plays fine when he isn ' t played out of position . I don ' t care what anyone says , he isn ' t a bloody winger . When he plays central , he ' s great . Even against PSG when we were woeful , he played well until moved to the wing . <| sep |> You FIEND ! You traded your life for his ? I hope you ' re not some worthless douche . What music have you created ? <| sep |> You need to drop certain bits from the URL find first '?' and drop everything from this character inclusive till the end of the line . <| sep |> But that garbage has better stats than Onix . <| sep |> Yes please . <| sep |> It ' ll be banned so what ' s the problem ? <| sep |> other welfare programs give more money to you if you are unemployed . What do you mean ? Your boss won ' t always let you work more hours , you can ' t always find a second or third job . Not to mention , why are we incentivizing single parents , for instance , working 4 jobs ? Will we give them more money for beating their children to to make them grow thicker skin ? So it should be called the unearned income tax credit ? Or the baby incentive tax credit ? Or the fundamentalist incentive program ? Better than nothing though . That ' s the thing , the EITC was used to replace other , better safety net programs to funnel taxpayer dollars to big families . Those aren ' t the options . The options are EITC or better programs . The EITC is beloved by economists and policy wonks , and it has bipartisan support . It ' s not . I mean , I ' m sure republicans like it . And , as you say , if the options are this or republicans putting all the money into tax cuts for the rich then you ' ll get some democratic votes but they don ' t like it . And tell me more about how economists love the idea of stupid , overly complicated handout programs . Because handout programs designed to funnel tax dollars to big families for political reasons just happen to be the most economically effective handout program .