lol next you ' re gonna tell me the tree ' s didn ' t consent to the tapping either <| sep |> If you ' re cascading into it , you get it if either side is small enough and you choose which side to cast even if the other side is too big . You can ' t fuse it though , since you won ' t be casting from hand . <| sep |> brilliant <| sep |> We needed that stop . <| sep |> word word . not getting my hopes up tho <| sep |> You haven ' t presented an argument or anything worth listening to , simply stated something as fact when it obviously isn ' t the case . Considering I ' ve worked at the major 3 letter media outlets in Manhattan what I say is the case , direct from first hand experience . This is not an argument , this is me telling you certain points of what you are saying are factually wrong , plain and simple . There is no argument because you are wrong and I am right , end of story on those points . This comment proves you don ' t know more about media than I do . This blatantly false understanding of the media also demonstrates you don ' t look into the backgrounds of the people they interview on their shows . You are not thinking critically enough , question everything kid . Go down the rabbit hole and google the people they interview to perpetuate their lies in order to get uneducated poor people to vote against their interests . All it proves if that you are incapable of details . All you have done is make generic broadstroke comments . Furthermore if you want to change people YOU need to provide evidence . YOU need to provide proof . Much like in the court of law the prosecution must prove you to be guilty . So if you ' d like to use some details and prove what you are saying instead of making generic and vague comments , pointing toward the magical google and youtube and these people go ahead . I am looking forward to being told by somebody who has no professional experience in the media why the person who does such professional experience in the media is wrong about how the media operates .