It ' s because you ' re boring and I don ' t care . Don ' t you have your wife ' s bull to prep ? Buzz off cuck . <| sep |> You weren ' t THERE , manthose of us who stayed up all night s <| sep |> if u can ' t beat them join them , slap a iceborn gauntlet frozen mallet goo fling rlyeiases to put their ms to 0 whilst you bm them until your fingers die from exaustion spamming <| sep |> Well holy shit , its grey and purple . <| sep |> MMA Junkie got their hands on the investor packet WMEIMG was using to pitch their loan sales to investors and they had figures that were far below what was being reported and used by Meltzer and even Dana himself . And those investor packets aren ' t hard numbers , they are fluffed up themselves . UFC 196 , Dana claimed 1 . 5 million buys and investors were being told 1 . 3 million . As another example of how these figures slide UFC 189 McGregorMendes . Dana said it did well over a million buys . Dave Meltzer agrees and says the numbers were over a million buys . Then later in the year the UFC posted on the bio for the event that it did a million buys . In response , Meltzer changed his estimates to a million . Then the UFC removed the reference to PPV buys completely and Meltzer dropped his estimates to 800 K . This pattern has emerged for several cards . And it ' s always downward revisions . Usually for big events , the numbers are supposed to increase . The UFC doesn ' t rebut Meltzer because his estimates are always high . Why would they say an event wasn ' t as popular as Meltzer claimed ? But the times Meltzer has criticized the UFC , Dana attacked him . Now Meltzer rarely speaks out against the UFC . The numbers are all over the place . Using them in any form of comparison with boxing , which due to publicly traded companies being the distributors , has a higher standard of accuracy is flawed .