There is one post about this a week . <| sep |> Will this change the announced date and pairing of Storm Crow ? <| sep |> Todo el mundo laburo en softek , TODOS . <| sep |> I couldn ' t tell if the car was getting closer . Then it hit me . <| sep |> I don ' t build meta loadouts , I always customize loadouts to my tastes . <| sep |> Even if you include all the supporting industries to farming as farmers there is still a net increase in productivity . As someone who has been a farmer and then a factory worker chicken processing I have seen first hand the 1000 fold increase in productivity capital goods are able to generate . Also farmers pay taxes too . How do you know the net movement of wealth from taxation isnt away from primary industries ? I find it difficult to believe that there is a flow of wealth from welfare recipients towards farmers for example . Capital accumulation can be translated into market dominance only under a monopoly money systemsure once you have wealth you can buy government power through regulations . I doubt though that fiat money is a net benefit to farmers rather than bankers . Are you supporting OPs assertion of the labor theory of value or do you just disagree with my gross generalization of agricultural productivity ? I ' m not particularly married to the statistical argument . A single example of people valuing a low labor cost good would have sufficed for me .