Fuck , so it wasn ' t just me ? God fucking damn it <| sep |> I bought his old and new stuff , and I ' ll upvote yours . Very cool map ! <| sep |> Can I get herpes from the Swedish gf or nah <| sep |> While that ' s true , again , it works both ways . You ' re locked in to an AMD card if you want to use Freesync . Again and again and again Freesync can be freely and easily supported by Nvidia and it would be great for consumers . It is not proven if Nvidia is open to licensing to AMD for a reasonable royalty . What Nvidia did was simply developing Gsync and selling it . And then keep the status quo when AMD developed a competitor . They could have made GSync openstandard in the first place . They could simply add FreeSync alongside GSync . Etc . They are not obligated to do anything because they are forprofit , like Oculus . I already wrote it in my previous comment . You can read it again . That was a rhetorical question . It is not false equivalency because consumers are hurt by reduction of choices because the functionality in question simply not working in a different platform . A PR disaster of an attempt to recoup the manufacturing costs of their very expensive to produce blower . More like pricegouging to take advantage of supply constraints .