Play Bard . <| sep |> Was there ANY proof in the 85 case , NO . Was SA exonerated because they found proof , NO . If he wasn ' t exonerated because of found proof and there wasn ' t any proof , believing manipulation happened is an large illogical jump . It wasn ' t until the investigation for the civil suit the evidence of wrong doing started coming out , there has been no such investigation of this case , so it is not fair to make this statement . The Wisconsin DOJ cleared the Manitowoc Sheriff Department of wrongdoing , so there was an investigation . But it ' s obvious you won ' t accept that either . There is a reasonable suspicion that the evidence was tamper with , until there is a proper investigation and depositions under oath of LE , you cannot expect there is not proof hiding somewhere of LE involvement . There isn ' t reasonable suspicion that evidence was tampered with , because there is no evidence to suggest it . You ' re reaching again . Does presumption of innocence only apply to convicted criminals that you want to be free or does it apply to all people ? 85 PROVES these LE are 100 % capable of corruption , manipulating evidence and hiding evidence . There is no PROOF of corruption , manipulating evidence , and hiding evidence . There is evidence to suggest the department made some massive mistakes and that individuals tried to hide their mistakes , but there is no evidence for the claims you ' re making . And no one can deny they had MOTIVE . There was no motive in 1985 , and the whole lawsuit motive is incredibly weak . Step outside of your bias and look at things objectively . If you follow the evidence , there is no manipulation of evidence by law enforcement , just incompetence .