Yeah , not so infuriating in unranked as a bit takes the place . But it cancels the whole game In ranked <| sep |> Take that 4 million and mail it to the government for debt reduction , it would do more good . <| sep |> So what if I had an eBay account that is my moms but i use then I ' ll be okay right ? I ' ll just skip Amazon <| sep |> right , but damage should be low compared to the nutella A 10 hunter right ? <| sep |> Why , is he standing behind me ? I ' m afraid to look now . <| sep |> I doubt he was in that shape in 1980 . I don ' t doubt it by ' 88 . Alzheimer ' s is not pretty . <| sep |> I would take that a step further and say that they ' re not criteria for morality , like I said , I wouldn ' t look at it in terms of right or wrong , but perhaps just and unjust but criteria for whether or not something is a person , and therefore in need of having rights to be respected . The question at hand is whether fetuses should be protected from negative experiences . Given that they ' re incapable of experiencing anything , there ' s no need to protect them . It ' s like asking if we have to protect an unburnable object from being burned . Morality enters into the discussion when we ' re talking about whether or not rights , if necessary , should be respected , to which I ' d say that respecting rights is just because others respect your rights , and therefore the favor should be returned . Respecting one another ' s rights is necessary so that our own can be respected agreeing not to harm others is the best way to protect yourself from not being harmed . This question however doesn ' t apply to a fetus being incapable of experiencing harm , they don ' t need to be protected from it .