Didn ' t upvote or downvote . Don ' t know enough of this event to have an opinion on this piece . I ' m just saying , Reuters and AP have a tendency to not include certain aspects . All I ' m saying is that you shouldn ' t judge the legitimacy of a downvote simply because it ' s from Reuters . Especially when its about IsraelPalestine . I ' ll respond to your other comment here instead of making two chains If there is a legitimate reason for disputing the article I agree to an extent , but that discussion spoils happen before voting the source down . What I saw this morning was an article deliberately being suppressed by probably bots , but even so it represents that the news is biased based on who controls the most bots . This I can get behind completely , if you feel the need to actually downvote due to missing content or context , drop a comment to explain why , don ' t be a coward who throws a brick through a window . Stand by your opinion .