Absurd , yet flaccid . If you ' re a troll , 15 stars . If you ' re seriously doubting your faith . just sober up and try to explain you concerns a bit better . We ' ll still be here . <| sep |> Keep watch , dear Lord , with those who work , or watch , or weep this night , and give your angels charge over those who sleep . Tend the sick , Lord Christ give rest to the weary , bless the dying , soothe the suffering , pity the afflicted , shield the joyous , and all for your love ' s sake . Amen . <| sep |> That ' s it , I mean it sounds so gross that I think it will work . It ' s like all those really crappy 70 ' s dishes that sound gross and taste great . <| sep |> We have like no options here . Win or lose people . <| sep |> Sad that it must be said , but being insulting doesn ' t make you more right and it certainly doesn ' t make you look good . Failed to understand the sentence again , I see . Not at all . I was telling you that your subjective opinion is not a statement of fact . Yes it is . Subjectively , this work of ' art ', and I use that in the loosest terms , is trash . It is indisputable fact that it is so . One man ' s trash might be another man ' s treasure , but since art is subjective , and we ' re talking my subjective opinion in particular , this work is trash . Which wasn ' t the argument . At this point you ' re not even staying on topic , so let ' s recap 1 You said it was unethical because there was no consent 2 I said that claim was an unproven allegation and irrelevant to the discussion because doesn ' t mean it ' s not art 3 You said it was a reasonable assumption because most people wouldn ' t consent to it 4 I rebutted by providing an example of an exhibition that receives consent from many people to do similar things , stated that even if most people wouldn ' t consent to it that doesn ' t make the accusation any more true as you implied that it did and that it is still irrelevant because it still doesn ' t make what he does not art , 5 No rebuttal , just I highly doubt it 6 Me reiterating that it does not give your argument any more weight 7 You going off topic about why they shouldn ' t have done it something I ' ve not once disputedAdded numbers for reference . Look at # 1 it ' s unethical . Look at # 7 going off topic about why they shouldn ' t have done itWho ' s going off topic here ? See line # 2 , your first reference to yourself , arguing it ' s art . Completely off topic and irrelevant , considering I wasn ' t disputing that it ' s art . Re # 3 there ' s verification that one man went on craiglist or some such site and got another man to chop off his dick and cook it for them to eat . In the sample size of literally billions , you are going to find odd examples . 4 is not a rebuttal , 4 is an example of an exception , which does not disprove that the majority of people don ' t want their corpse to be cut up and shown off with a dick on their face . There ' s no point arguing the rest of those lines because you fail to understand this , among other things . Actually I am discussing it , you simply don ' t like what I have to say . I gave my opinion on the piece . You don ' t like what I had to say about it , arguing other people like it , other people consider it art . that ' s not discussion , that ' s an attempt at browbeating into conformity , and to be succinct go fuck yourself . Moreover , I haven ' t made any such claim or suggestion that I ' m artistic or that people who don ' t respect desecrecation sic of a corpse are somehow less than . In fact , not even once did I share my personal opinions on him or his work . Your repeated defense of it as art , and how you choose to do so says enough .