Post a picture ? <| sep |> It ' s back now . I had the same problem of this guy <| sep |> Well , his camp also hires speech writers who plagiarize liberally , so I ' m not surprised the same ethic dictates the copywriters they hire ! <| sep |> Well I ' m a moronic American . I am proof of our failure at education and I ' ve been to college ! I didn ' t see the musical , and I think I ' ve always mixed him up with Adams . Thanks for the correction ! <| sep |> The only thing partisans agree upon is that the system is broken . Until changes are made to fix the infrastructure of our legislature , until the average citizen has the power to regulate the gov ' t , our voices will be ignored in favor of corporate and special interests . My question is this Would you or would you not vote for a Reformist Party who ' s only interest is giving every vote more power , and every person more choice ? If they were centrists or nonpartisans who refused to cast a vote in matters unrelated to reform , would you elect them ? There seem to be many common sense solutions which are not given any attention such as Make the vote count 1 ranked ballot voting and 2 proportional representation will remove the spoiler effect as well as minority rule , and create new parties which allow for more grassroots politicians and political diversity More choice More voice Reduce money ' s influence 1 Overturning Citizens United 2 removing congresses control of their own pay and benefits 3 in addition to campaign financing reform such as Patriot Dollars All voters would be given a $ 50 publicly funded vouchers to donate to federal political campaigns . All donations including both the $ 50 voucher and additional private contributions , must be made anonymously through the FEC . This will reduce corporate and special interest groups ability to buy politicians . Greater economic status cannot justify unequal political liberties . Plenty of other systemic issues exist that have solutions . Yet Washington won ' t move on them because it would decrease the power of both the parties , and therefore the power of their big donors .