which is what generates clicks , and gets people reading articles . which , ultimately , keeps the papers in business which as a business is their only interest . <| sep |> I agree that the accuracy will change if you change the target , but not the meaning . Calling someone corrupt is an attack if they are corrupt it ' s a deserved and accurate attack , but it doesn ' t stop being an attack . In the same way , you clearly feel that attacking men is acceptable and accurate , that men deserve the hate and black people don ' t but it doesn ' t stop being hate just because you think it ' s accurate . The facts don ' t change the message they just change it ' s accuracy if the message is one of hate , it remains one of hate it just becomes an inaccurate message of hate . If the message is a kind and decent one , it remains kind and decent just inaccurate . Is the message kind and decent ? Or is it hateful ? EDIT I seem to be coming down with a cold , so if I continue this I ' ll probably end up attacking you rather than your positionarguments , so I ' m going to stop here , and unsub from the comment chain .