I think this scripting theory is not really true , because top gamers are able to win between 35 to 40 games out of 40 , so if there were scripting , how would you expect that to happen ? ? I mean , I agree that some scripting might exist , but if you get good at the game , you might be stronger than those small scripting , do you get me ? <| sep |> HAM My sole goal this weekend is to win the race . 2016 hasn ' t been a great year for me but there have been some positives Wins 9 races year hasn ' t been great # JustMercedesThings <| sep |> see me yet ? tried trading you no response <| sep |> I found my ruler that ' s been lost for a week today . <| sep |> Honestly , it took me about an hour and a half before just saying fuck it and switching to Haskell . OCaml ' s Right Way To Do ItTM involves Polluting my . bashrc with a bunch of OPAM stuff Polluting my . vimrc with a bunch more stuff Polluting my source repository with a . merlinfile which should clearly be automatically generated ~~ Writing an opam file ~~ ~~ generating an opam file from a oasis configuration ~~ figuring out Oasis ' s obnoxious error messages . It ' s like best practices and user experience are slurs in the OCaml world . Meanwhile in the Haskell world , I can just install stack and be done with it . Note that the only reason I was going with OCaml in the first place is because Haskell isn ' t supported by Bash on Windows . However , now that the fix is inboundrrn , I ' m not going to struggle anymore with a programming language that actively resists adoption .