i could actually live with both as long as it ' s not needed for me to stand still next to an arena for minutes . usually i only do drive bys for time reasons . <| sep |> Awesome thanks for the help ! <| sep |> Wait you ' re trolling . Nvm <| sep |> The triple lock is fundamentally unsustainable . It is guaranteed to raise pensions by more than any increases in tax revenue . During every otherwise stagnant period , pensions continue to increase by 2 . 5 % annually ! Edit I guess there are possible two arguments for the triple lock 1 Pensions are too low at the moment . The triplelock is guaranteed to gradually increase pensions to a more appropriate level , after which point it can be relaxed . I don ' t have such a strong problem with this argument . 2 The triple lock is a good policy , and can be continued in perpetuity . This is not correct . The policy guarantees that pension increases will outstrip wage growth . That ' s not sustainable .