Great stat <| sep |> Shoot . I ' m in Canada . Thank you though ! Might have to send husband out . <| sep |> i thought there was supposed to be a sbc every hour ? <| sep |> Every country has the right to protect their borders . And schengen countries have a duty to protect other countries . <| sep |> You saying incorrect things in order to get fast answers is an application of Cunningham ' s Law . I don ' t know if it ' s the same phenomenon as this , but it ' s certainly in the same ballpark . <| sep |> What the hell , it looks like video game graphics at first glance with low quality textures and all <| sep |> Just tagging on to this , the matter is settled constitutional law . South Dakota v . Dole , 483 U . S . 203 1987 created a five part test for when the federal government can put conditions on whether funds are disbursed or not . Printz v . United States , 521 U . S . 898 1997 stands for the proposition that federal law cannot compel state law enforcement to cooperate with some federal scheme . Finally U . S . v . Arizona , 567 U . S . 2012 , struck down state laws that attempted to create a state level offense for violations of federal immigration rules . These three cases taken together make Trump ' s plan very difficult . Even supposing that a law removing funding from sanctuary cities could pass the five part test of Dole , he would have to have a reasonable condition that neither compelled local law enforcement to act , in violation of Printz , and does not encourage the creation of state level offenses for violations of federal immigration law , in violation of Arizona .