Agreed ! Happy that i found the right class for this expansion . <| sep |> You ' re the best <| sep |> Some great points . In a sense the sentece They complain primarily because TWW is new and different is true for it is after all a fantasy setting one could argue this new and different is valid to Empire Total War as well . Still is it wrong to think that you like some more familiar setting such as a certain historical time period and have a better gameplay experience with that ? I can relate myself to this kind of thinking sometimes . I know the Warhammer franchise has deep lore and great stories behind it but to be fair it needs the interest to be there , if you want to delve into it . Lacking this information I sometimes feel like I cant quite grasp the feeling of the world of Warhammer . I dont know if Im alone with this thought but playing the time periods I have read about and know of come to me as more relatable and give the mentality for roleplaying playthrough , which is one of the biggest points of Total Warseries even though the historical titles are not always so historical looking at you Rome , Arcani etc . . Im not saying TWW is a bad game . This is just the same thing as one liking Shogun 2 more than Rome 2 or viceversa . The other point of huge fanbase is quite solid . The game did after all combine the two already existing groups of Total War gamers and Tabletop fans . Still I wouldnt say the older Total War games have a very niche fanbase dont underestimate the nostalgia P . If they werent popular we might not have the ingame quality eyecandy we are used to today . Lets plays are doing ok on youtube but regardless of the title the battles are doing way better . Lionheart 216 k subs and Pixelated Apollo 243 k subs and focuses a lot in older titles . Lionhearts lets plays get around 60 k views and as the series goes on it drops significantly at around 520 k views . Pixelated Apollo has almost every single battle video sitting at 60 k mark . Seems that Third Age Total War is rocking some ridiculous view marks . So just saying that we still love to watch older total war title footage . Emphasising Hell , it has its own DEVELOPMENT group now , is perhaps a bit too much because we knew that piece of information before the game even launched . They told us about their 10 year plan and commitment for the Warhammer title and soothed some aching hearts with the information of separate teams for Warhammer , historical and Arena . Good to see they have the possibility to do so ! AI in every title is easily abused and sometimes does some ridiculous stuff . In some titles more than others I grant that , but have you never chased an army across the map in warhammer ? Food system and money atleast in Rome 2 wasnt really a problem after you got 1 or 2 of those settlements which give 3 food for every region you own stacked up when upgrading or getting another one solved the need for almost any farming based buildings and money began just pouring in after 1 or 2 specified moneymaking provinces granting 815 k per turn depending on faction . Diplomacy has never been the strong point of Total War . I would dare to say most of us dont fiddle with it too much again regardless of the title . Perhaps some trades and couple alliancesnonagression pacts to keep one half of the map safe while marching across the other . I know this sounds kind of a like rant about you being totally wrong and all that but thats not what Im getting at . Im just trying to point out that all the titles are in some ways different and we like different things . They all have their faults and they all have their fanbase which does not mean that they hate the other titles just the difference between 300 to 1000 hours of gameplay . I think Warhammer titles will be great playground for testing new mechanics to implement into the historical titles , but thats all there is to me for warhammer . Its not a bad game by any means . A solid 35 , but so far for me its not the greatest of the Total War franchise either .