apparently race wasn ' t the issue <| sep |> Stupid ad for an Xbox One S nearly crashed my browser opening this . <| sep |> PES mobile ? ? What ' s up with it <| sep |> Race . Duh . <| sep |> Time flies when your having fun 8 D <| sep |> Find a good beginner ' s build guide for the play style you like . A good one will tell you why they chose the things that they did . Looking at several will allow you to see techniques that are widespread CwDT lvl 1 , linking CoH with AoE auras . <| sep |> Yep that ' s retarded , I ' m French . Even alcoholics who are taking wine for breakfast will pair with cheese , sausage or anything strong , not a croissant au beurre . <| sep |> Disklejmr SNS SMRDIUmetnici je najbolje razumeju u politiku i ekonomiju <| sep |> You couldn ' t because there are diminishing returns when you get to relativistic speeds . Not really . Eventually the mechanical power being added to the spacecraft by the emdrive exceeds the power output of the power source . If the emdrive is 300 times more efficient than a photon rocket at converting energy into momentum , as claimed by Eagleworks , this will happen at speeds at which relativistic effects are irrelevant . And even if they were relevant , it wouldn ' t alter the conclusion . What you are saying is false because the EM drive should be losing mass massenergy equivalence . No , what I ' m saying is true . The emdrive doesn ' t lose nearly enough mass . That is because the minimum amount of mass a thruster can lose and still respect conservation of energy is that of a photon rocket . Moral if the emdrive is even a tiny bit more efficient than a photon rocket , even by 1 %, it ' s a perpetual motion machine . Guaranteed .