This gets so annoying after awhile . Just give us like 56 chests and don ' t give us the ability to lock them . Problem solved <| sep |> Can you imagine trying to have an honest political discussion and getting called ignorant everytime you ask them for the source of a claim they ' re making ? Welcome to the world of being a Trump supporter . A lot of this people simply can ' t conceive of the possibility that they were misinformed by a biased news source , and they ironically attack Trump supporters for daring to use biased sources of their own . Here ' s the thing all news have different levels of bias , and I am ultimately concerned about if the facts they present are objectively true to help frame a cohesive picture of what is going on . I have grown very weary of specific news organizations after spending so many hours on wikileaks combing through the documents , as we now know of specific networks and papers that directly colluded with Clinton ' s campaign to craft a specific narrative they want . Coincidentally , your source is included in that effort albeit not that specific author , at least from what I remember . So , let me clarify I never said Trump was only advocating against violent protestors . I brought up a single specific example that is used against him often because it is the main direct call for physical confrontation he has made between his supporters and protesters . In that example , which I have gone through in many similar discussions , it ' s like pulling teeth just getting them to post the full context that shows Trump was actually advocating being defended from an assaulting protester . If that example wasn ' t being referenced , I was then asking for the full context of any other example . So , being charitable to your argument . If Trump specifically advocated for unprovoked violence against nonviolent protesters , then I would fully agree that is morally reprehensible . However , I think you will find that the vast majority of examples you will find are either speaking about responding to violenct protesters or even defending the actual protesters from harm from his supporters which many news organizations decided not to spread around with equal veracity . Now , I want you to think for a moment about Trump ' s position . He ' s speaking offthecuff , cracking jokes , and using obvious hyperbole from a self described position of a nonPC nonpolitician . You then see some random violence break out , and you preface your statements under the assumption that the agitator started it . You then say that you support responding punches with punches which is legally permissible behavior . Suddenly , when it turns out that a bird dogger paid DNC agitator pushed someone ' s buttons just right to initiate the violence , Trump is painted as someone advocating unprovoked violence for merely protesting . I challenge you to find an example of him actually doing that in full context . That being said , I empathize with the complaints of people who think Trump is carless with his rhetoric . Those are valid concerns . Not only did he realize his rhetoric was getting a bit much as he campaigned , he spent considerable effort to ensure highly disruptive protesters were not attacked or injured through the campaign , which I would be happy to provide in full context . These are the things that were not well covered by any of these coincidentally wikileak implicated HRC colluding news organizations . But remember , I ' m just a willfully ignorant Trump supporter .