I would say that if they cancelled it , and not you , then you did right . Unless theees a weasel clause in it that says you have to complete under any circumstance . <| sep |> Why do jungle camps even have unit collision on them ? Can understand why it exists for lane minions <| sep |> Tie it up before halftime . <| sep |> My argument in response to the commonly seen ideas are not scarce is that good ideas are scarce and bad ideas are plentiful , so I think that point of view fails . Also , I ' ve never seen an advocate of IP say that ideas can be owned , yet that is a common strawman made against IP you can ' t own ideas . There are no patents on ideas , there are patents for designs and innovations with enough documentation and evidence to support the designinnovation . With respect to the last two paragraphs , I don ' t see any issue if there is no damage done . What would happen if you did claim to win the title , even though it isn ' t true ? I would think most people are just going to laugh at you and it won ' t make a difference . If anything , you are denying reality to yourself , which is a much deeper issue than authorship of the past . And if some nobody on Twitter says your company ' s product is causing cancer , but they don ' t have a reputation of their own , it is likely that their assertion will just fall in to the trenches of the internet and have no impact . However , if they have a reputation and a following that can cause damage to the companyindividual , by claiming their product causes cancer even if it doesn ' t , there is a link between the lie and the damage . I ' ve seen plenty of ancaps that are against IP , plenty of them justify it with the first argument I addressed . I think it would be possible to have a system outside of the state the credits people with the work they did , and this is the most crucial point if people are not credited for the valuable work they did , we will see a decrease in the creation of these valuable works .