To me , the most striking thing about this pic is how slim Elvis looks here . Three years later he died looking like a beached whale . <| sep |> Hmm , nothing to worry about then you think ? <| sep |> For more images check out my instgram <| sep |> hahahha same exact thing here bro <| sep |> Yes , that is a good point about a corollary , but here ' s the kicker as far as I am aware , that corollary is not and should not be legally explicit in the way laws are written . As I understand it , laws at least in Canada are largely written on a preclusionary basis . i . e . No person shall do , with the following exceptions , , . It limits the powers that enforce these laws and upholds the autonomy of the groups they apply to . My understanding is that Peterson is taking objection to the fact that this new law , as written , is not naturally preclusionary . Rather than allowing him to speak in a free manner with some exceptions , it effectively gives legislators the power to legally compel him to speak only those things which they approve of . This is a degree of censorship which he believes runs counter to his right of free speech . I don ' t know if he ' s right , I don ' t even know if he is actually feels the way I just described , but from everything I have read about this story , that ' s my sense of the central crux of his argument . That being said , I have read the proposed changes to C 16 , and I personally don ' t read it as the l e veloffreespeechinfringing literature that Person says it is .