Yea , form is so critical when the weight gets heavy . I perform much better when I take a deep breath and brace my core before each rep , and explode upward back to starting position . If I ' m breathing in the middle of the lift , my core turns to gel and the weight feels 5 x heavier . <| sep |> Awesome job you deserve respect . <| sep |> But voting data is way too complex and decontextualized to make such an absolute claim that he is not unique or dangerous . When I say Trump is unique , I ' m not saying that in the context of votes , I ' m saying that in the context of his campaign , his fitness as a candidate , his stances , and the unusual path to victory he found . When I say Trump is dangerous , it ' s because I view his inexperience , his lack of understanding of government , and his bombastic public behavior as weaknesses in his ability to govern a world superpower effectively . I don ' t need votes to tell me what actual objective data can say more plainly . Our very conversation belies the fact that votes are not clear data when discerning cultural shifts . Look at the election of Rutherford Hayes and tell me what you can about the cultural attitudes towards South Reconstruction and postemancipation America . Not exactly a clear picture if you go off the raw numbers . I realize we ' re both saying the same thing when we say that there are multiple factors and that we are both clearly weighting things differently . My point is , I feel like you are taking votes way too much as canon without thought to data beyond voting . By that I mean looking at history , how the electoral map works , looking at polls that are not about voting and rather political stances , and data on drivers of voter turnout . My point isn ' t just that voter data is complicated , it ' s that you can only use it so much to make claims such as a person ' s objective background , qualifications , and rhetoric . We objectively voted in one of the US ' s most unqualified candidate for president and the whys of that are something to untangle but it ' s not just demographics of voter data we need to tell that story . Voter data is a small and complicated part that actually only tells us so much . I wonder , if we looked at the votes of people who felt disenfranchised , how many voted for Trump ? How many voted for a system that burns everyone instead of just them ? How many people voted for what they believed a brighter future ? How much crossover is there in terms of race and gender when those reasons are stratified ? We don ' t have that data but if we did don ' t you ' d think it ' d be more telling that just what group voted for whom ?