You have my sympathies . <| sep |> I ' m definitely interested ! I love this sub ! <| sep |> allright , thanks everybody . now i know , why no information for that topic available . seems just not to be practical X <| sep |> I think him mike williams , juju smith are extremely talented for me Davis is at the top but Mike williams and juju could easily be tops on peoples boards with no argument from me . <| sep |> Looks like he ' s waving tbh <| sep |> I fear Stephanie may be the last as well as the only , but what a way to go <| sep |> A pic of trumps iconic orange face <| sep |> I got it as soon as it changed to $ 99 what are the odds that i actually not get canceled ? <| sep |> I ' d be just as annoyed if Trump won the popular vote and Hillary won the EC . I ' ll take your word for it yawn . And if this is the case , you ' re in the wrong country . Granted , it ' s just short of of 5 x but the fact remains it is , indeed , based he fact that Germany has more votes I feel like you keep replying to the wrong person . Whether or not Germany had more votes was never a disagreement in this discussion . Rather , it was whether or not they got votes directly proportional to their larger population . They don ' t . Just like California doesn ' t . Just like China doesn ' t in the U . N . When you gather sovereign powers together and yes , the states are separately sovereign entities , you must have diminishing returns upon population , if you even measure it at all . It ' s not complicated . Stop making me repeat this point . Just to make it easier for you , the only reason Germany has 96 instead of more is because they ' re literally capped at 96 . Just to make it easier for you that is not an argument . You aren ' t making an argument . You ' re simply supporting my argument . It is not proportional . Beginning and end of story .