4 crates for white neptunes <| sep |> Would that include law enforcement witnesses ? <| sep |> Here ' s what I ' m getting out of thisa All truths are knowable . Likewise , all truths are known to something . For something to be CLASSIFIED as a truth , it must be known to be truthful . For statement A to be called a truth , Any person AZ must know statement A to be truthful , or else , it cannot be CLASSIFIED a truth . b You can deduce that there are many truthful things that can possibly be known . The position of every individual particle in the universe , in relation to one particle , is each its own truth . c Since the universe could not possibly know every one of these truths due to the absolute physical limitations of any number of processors , AND that all truths MUST be known to something , then there must be a God that transcends our world , who is also imbued with knowledge that far surpasses the limitation of the physical universe . He must know these truths in order for them to even be CLASSIFIED as truthful . If you want to call something a truth , it must be known that it is true . Therefore , something cannot be classified as a truth if we do not know it to be true . I think the problem here is what we are calling a truth . For example , at face value , it makes sense to say that every particle has a numbered value for its position in relation to something . But , this is not a CLASSIFIED truth since we cannot measure every particle ' s position . So yes , every CLASSIFIED truth must be known to somebody or something , but everything that is ACTUALLY true , regardless of who knows it , does not need to be known , simply because it will be true regardless of someone ' s knowledge . So I ' m thinking this paper is flawed . Edit If someone can debunk what I am saying , you are welcome to . I ' m certainly no expert at this .