Background checks aren ' t enough ? Thanks big brother for trying to make it so hard to express the right to bear arms <| sep |> Oh interesting ! Have you made those before ? <| sep |> Not really , are you aware of communications act sec 230 ? <| sep |> My fantasy defense weeps . <| sep |> Hahahahah true , at least I can make my impact on evolution <| sep |> FYI , that puts it below the value triggering import taxes in Germany . Meaning if there ' s a proper customs declaration on the parcel you should receive it normally . <| sep |> I don ' t see the bar falling from his shoulder to the floor being the cause of injury . The rail is so low that his shoulder catches the bar well above the rail ' s height and that ' s where he seems hurt had he been more forward , it would have still caught his shoulder , but then rolled back into the rail instead of the floor . his face clearly shows pain and probably whatever injury he was going to suffer at this point , where the bar is locked on the near side between his shoulder muscle and his neck . At that point , the bar is , in fact , over the safety rail just too high for it . No matter how far forward he was , the shoulder muscle is keeping the bar from rolling off . Only a higher safety rail that would have caught the bar high enough that his shoulder muscle could drop below that point would have helped here . He then rolls his shoulder and the bar comes over that muscle and off to the floor because he turned his body and the bar rolled off his arm backwards past the rail . Any injury would seem like it comes from where the bar got locked on his shoulder , and maybe from rolling over that muscle not from the fact that he then went down to the floor , not onto the safety rail . I don ' t think his forward position made much difference here .