Exposes me as what ? I ' ve been in the car business for 5 years , everyone on earth thinks their car is fully loaded . Maybe other shithead salesmen say the same about the cars on their lot , but professionals like me and the other contributors to this sub don ' t bullshit people like that . <| sep |> Wait a minute , how did you know how the actual scary pedo rings referred to child porn ? .<| sep |> Dude is missing shit every game . <| sep |> The hospital after my surgery . The anesthesia made me briefly forget that I had a surgery at all , and I thought I was 23 years younger and in another country for a good 10 minutes . <| sep |> How about Gradings forHas 150 year track record of Stable Governance in CanadaRisk of causing political instability through changeRisk of resulting in deadlocked governments eg SpainRisk of fringe parties playing KingmakerThat ' s why this is so hilariously biased . The idea that being ' fair ' to fringe parties is simply assumed to be a good thing . But if we get an altright party playing kingmaker , a huge majority of Canadians don ' t consider that be a good thing . Highly fractured parliaments can give small parties influence far above their voting percentages , way worse than the false majorities of FPTP . Our system requires parties to have a wide base of support in order to have their political voices heard . Many people consider that a feature and don ' t consider it unfair at all . Your having 4 criteria of being ' fair ' to the fringes means you clearly disagree , but that ' s 100 % opinion and knocks FFTP out immediately . I ' ve made more than enough Option Matrices in my time to see the blatant manipulation to get the results you wanted . You ' ve also failed to explain your Key Performance Indicators . Notice none of the criteria you list necessarily lead to better governance or outcomes for Canadians . The idea that they will , is also 100 % your opinion .