You don ' t see how a sitting member of the judiciary declaring that a person should be lynched i . e . deprived of their most basic due process rights in the judicial system is an act that would harm the public ' s trust in the integrity of the judiciary to protect and enforce basic due process rights ? Seriously ? This is blatant . He is openly showing that he , an acting member of the judiciary , thinks a person ' s due process rights should be violated so they can be lynched . That is ANTITHETICAL to the very core of judicial integrity . Publicly screaming We should ignore the very core of judicial integrity ! is very clearly NOT an acting in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity . . . of the judiciary . Please explain how a sitting judge declaring that a person ' s due process rights should be violated does not undermine confidence in the judiciary ' s integrity in protecting and holding those same rights sacred .