So from that bolded part do you think the employer would need an ID ? <| sep |> You ' re kidding me right ? The constant push for gun control and liberals wants guns banned altogether . <| sep |> A long anecdote , too long to repeat . Ofc , repeating it would defeat the object of deleting it . Aaaaahh , saw what you did there <| sep |> yeah , totally botched this one up . fixed this up now ! <| sep |> Because I ' ll get scolded if I don ' t <| sep |> Why did you say this , a few posts back The human gut bacteria assist the digestive process and even help our bodies extract nutrients from food . Because bacteria is beneficial to humans . This now seems irrelevant to your position . It can only really be relevant if your argument was that the creation of bacteria was net good , and that argument is only ok if you think God is incapable of creating onlygood bacteria . Huh ? I have no idea what you mean here . Now you ' re saying that God could have created onlygood bacteria . So wasn ' t your first sentence irrelevant ? Shouldn ' t you have stuck to saying ? Haaaang on , Are you even reading what I write ? God created a world where everything was good , man sinned and everything changed or in your parlance Man brought in the bad bits or facilitated the good bits going bad . How can you now say that . that God created bad bacteria , but he did so because he wanted toGod intended good but man went his own way and got the bad . We are both certain that creating lethal bacteria is a shit way to teach people that sin has consequences . you are too , right ? Is this some sort of argument ? your whole point is that you think you can come up with a different way of ding this and thus God isn ' t omnipotent . But different doesn ' t necessarily mean better . And that is what you ' d have to prove . But how do you prove that your less disease plan would have resulted in less sin or more people saved ? He could give us a little electric shock whenever we sin . Not enough to prevent us , but enough to let us know . How do you know this different plan would be better ? How do you prove this ? If you can ' t then , your whole argument fails .