I ' d like to have The Culling please . I dunno what those numbers mean though . My number is 8390 <| sep |> No it wasn ' t . My point was they are not relevant to this discussion , or blocksize debate . Since you can run whatever non consensus code you like and we dont need everyone doing the same thing . You can run whatever non consensus code you want that ' s correct . But saying that has no impact on Bitcoin is ridiculous . See my example with node that don ' t propagate blocks nor transactions . Bitcoin CANNOT work with such nodes . RBF is an example of non consensus code change that radically change Bitcoin usage . A soft fork to only accept one transaction per block would be another example too , yet blocks would still be valid , Bitcoin need a lot more that just consensus code to work . Still waiting your Peter Todd link .