He all took a couple bullets to the back <| sep |> I ' ll bet everything I own right now on a footrace with Jason Witten <| sep |> Ok rapgenious haha <| sep |> Iggins had chicken in a bucket 7 nights a week he would fuck it <| sep |> A judge shouldn ' t be weighing in publicly on a case that hasn ' t been tried yet . Even if the confession was freely given by an informed person there are numerous cases where those have been proven false . And it is just plain dumb . Now he isn ' t a criminal jusge according to the article and wouldn ' t be presiding over the case regardless . But what it shows is that this judge has no judgement or ability to even act unbiased until the evidence is in . And judges are literally supposed to be the best examples in our society of those traits . I wouldn ' t want this judge presiding over any case i was involved in and I could easily see it being used as evidence during an appeal if he was involved with criminal law .