I did midsupp and had 610 mid haha . I even posted about it a few days ago <| sep |> Also , it ' s been 5 years since I almost died on thanksgiving <| sep |> Oddly enough , they did the exact opposite against Scotland . Had a powerful defense , but tended to run themselves ragged against the Scottish forwards . <| sep |> It ' s a great opener . Ed and Jonny beating the living day lights of those drums . <| sep |> Do I need a hex editor for this ? Where is it located ? <| sep |> Saying More whites are shot by police is intentionally misleading , though . I disagree with that . It only is if you assume why he would say it . And one valid reason to say it is that it is true and correctly applies . Because the stat YOU quoted , while unarguably true , also is leading . The fact that both are true , with the population demographics as they are , shows that police brutality is a general problem , and that making it purely about race is missing the point as much as not making it about race at all . Look at it like this It is a bit like the voting debate about the electoral college and the popular vote . The biggest thing to glance is not EITHER , it ' s the contrast between them . Equally here , neither JUST the likelihood NOR the raw numbers tell the whole picture . BOTH are valid and important quantitative statements . Because if you don ' t understand how the core issue is not just nonwhites have it worse than whites but the fundamentally broken interaction between cops and populace , you are missleading and actually close to racebating . Your assumption that the only reason to mention HIS stat is a racist relativation of THE problem , is in itself a problem . The person BEFORE them made it about race by implying that white people don ' t have issues with police brutality . His stat was perfectly applicable in pointing out that by raw numbers it IS a giant problem . This is not misleading . You arguing that it is and only the likelihood matters is .