FUCK THE REFS . <| sep |> Anchovies by far <| sep |> I ' m sure you ' ve gotten this before , but where is Earth ? <| sep |> it ' s time to leave . Oh no , what ever shall we do ? <| sep |> I mean , there only 10 refs on the field . How can they be expected to follow the path of the ball at all times ? <| sep |> But it ' s not a misrepresentation or an inconsistency for one person to do something that was entirely possible and even customary in certain professions . If all 1960 s janitors were portrayed using typewriters at home , maybe . One ? No . He is not standing for the entire era , just for himself . His singular use of a typewriter in the 1960 s wouldn ' t be anachronistic . It wouldn ' t even be inconsistent . Not any more than a single janitor driving a tesla would be anachronistic today . It would just be unusual . Think of a bell curve . This janitor is a single data point on the tail of the curve . Anachronisms are things that warp or distort or misrepresent the curve itself . Sorry but you don ' t appear to understand the definition you posted . I don ' t think I can do anything else to help clarify . So long .