There is already video proof of this . no need to upvote this post . <| sep |> I hope so . cause rall right now barely has anything about this on it . <| sep |> I stand corrected ! Great pickup ! <| sep |> I ' m happy because it was a bit of a gamble signing Andersen and it looks like we got lucky . Very thankful we didn ' t have another Bernier situation <| sep |> That sounds great ! I ' ll get to hatching it for you . EDIT I prob wont be on for 56 hours as i ' ll be with family for thanksgiving <| sep |> Please stop with the put downs . I don ' t mean to offend you , but I ' m not sure if I should take this seriously or not . You ' re the one asserting that Christians are immoral for not committing child murder , so , naturally , I don ' t feel like it ' s a sympathetic discussion that you ' re after . To clarify , the Bible prohibits murder , but not necessarily killing another person , such as in the examples mentioned previously . I agree that there is a Biblical definition of killing others , and that it does make exceptions for self defense and the like of that . I am pointing out that murder is a legal term , and no such prohibition exists against generic killing of another person . What do you mean by generic killing ? Also , even if the law of our society upheld child murder with the highest esteem , our Biblical prohibition would remain . Therefore , this post does not solve the conundrum because a Christian government could , and arguably should , allow for the killing of children to guarantee their entry into a religious paradise . I ' ll respond to each point in the quote above a Christian government couldAs I explained earlier , this is highly impractical . A Christian government could not successfully condone child murder . and arguably should , allow for the killing of children to guarantee their entry into a religious paradise . Obviously you never read my response to your assertion , so I ' ll provide a summary of some reasons why I don ' t find child murder preferable to obeying the will of God 1 . We are not allowed to commit murder . Whether we changed the legal law or not , it would not change God ' s command , as He has specifically condemned murder and also stated that He desires that we allow children to choose Him . Matthew 1914 Jesus said , ' Let the little children come to me , and do not hinder them , for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these . ' I cannot take their choice away from them , nor can I commit the atrocity of murder . Now you ask me to weigh the choice of obeying the Creator of the Universe and Giver of Eternal Life with the choice to disobey Him and kill childrenI will obey God ' s command because His authority is makes the option of obeying Him morally correct no matter what the other choice is . Furthermore , I trust that He will carry out His good work via peaceful , Christlike evangelism , and so I have no reason to commit infanticide . 2 . In addition to the fact that God ' s authority makes disobedient options objectively wrong and therefore not preferable to any other option , in addition to the fact that His power and plan provides a better way for evangelism , I will also argue that a greater good is not accomplished through child murder . This is obvious to people who actually want to know if Christianity is true or not , since they tend to be the people who do not earnestly seek weak arguments against it while their answers are a google search away , but I digress . First , if employed on a massive scale , all Christians would die out , while also alienating the world to its messagemeaning far less people would be evangelized in the end than there would have been had we taken the Christian approach to evangelism . Further , I already explained the complicated reason for which one could not maintain their Christianity and become a child murderer , so the people doing this would 1 . face the wrath of God in the end , 2 . not be Christians . Now let ' s discuss what your objection would succeed in , even if it succeededSo it seems your argument against Christianity is that it condones child murderbut it doesn ' t . So then I guess you are arguing that Christianity makes people morally obligated to kill childrenbut it doesn ' t . So I suppose you are arguing that Christians could kill children to bring more people to heavenbut they couldn ' t . So I suppose you ' re really just looking to argue with Christians for amusement , or out of your arrogance . Either way , I ' ll have to redirect you to rDebateAChristian where you can accomplish whatever it is you ' re trying to accomplish here .