It ' s okay , we both know you read it , and we both know I hit the nail on the head , which is why you ' re actually not replying . Tata , loser . <| sep |> Stalin or whoever else of being a capitalist , that doesn ' t mean they ' re accusing him of being a liberal , but of acting , through the state he commanded , in a capitalist way . And that is my problem with your argument . Its only capitalist if you accept the Marxist definition of Capitalist , the one focused in the laborwage relationship . If we go to the Capitalist ' s definition of Capitalism , or the mainstream definition , or every other definition but the Capitalism ' s opponents really , then the USSR lack many of the fundamental features of a Capitalist system . Now , if we are going to accept the definitions of the most rabid opponents of a system , then North Korea is Socialist , because I am defining Socialism like that .