It talks about daily wage workers cuz the article is about daily wagers losing their work . Going by the article ' s mostly made up numbers , less than 10 % of daily wage workers have lost jobs . So , why does the article say that all daily wage workers are adversely affected ? Why are dailywage workers who haven ' t lost jobs affected , but not other non dailywage workers ? Where does the article say others are not getting affected ? 2025 % of the roughly 2 . 5 lakh workers in the leather industry have been adversely affected as they are daily wage workers . What sense does this sentence make ? <| sep |> They give me a rick vibe <| sep |> practically a soccor momAnd this is somehow . bad ? I do not understand . <| sep |> Why do you even care about AMWF if it doesn ' t even exist ? the market has dictated that Asian men are undesirable , words that I have heard to my face despite having a white fatherWhy should we even bother to pretend AMWF is anything beyond fantasy ?