Are there better deals for plus ? I can ' t see them . <| sep |> What I said originallybasically boils down to Trump got more votes on electronic machines . Your responsebasically boils down toNo , that ' s not what it boils down to , you boiled it down to a narrative you prefer regardless of what is being reported . So I responded with this quote from the article which proves that wrong and shows I ' m not boiling it down to a narrative I preferThe report says the scientists believe they have identified a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in Wisconsin counties that relied on electronic voting machines , compared to paper ballots and optical scanners . Now you obviously agree with this since you say I just quoted it . Again , Clinton performing worse in Wisconsin counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to Trump got more votes on electronic machines . What ' s the difference ? There ' s some major cognitive dissonance here . Can you link me to the scientists who urged Trump to call the elections rigged ? What was his basis for making the argument ? I never said there were any , I even say Trump didn ' t call them rigged and simply said he might not accept the result . The one I say was backed up by evidence is the primary election , and you can see the evidence for that herejusticeusa . orgIt ' s also worth noting that this evidence justifies Trump saying he may not accept results . Why would a party that ' s already rigged one vote be against rigging another ?