It wasn ' t too long ago that people were complaining about that sale that was just sales . No arg or mini games . People called it boring . <| sep |> to believe in God you must just suspend reason and have faith . I ' m basically asking , are there any flaws in this argument ? Well , there ' s not really much of an argument here . You ' ve assumed a very specific and contentious theory about what faith is and what ' s involved in or significant about belief in God , and then just asserted this assumption . Many people , both theists and otherwise , don ' t accept this assumption . From their point of view , the flaw in your argument is simply that you haven ' t really argued for your thesis at allor , to put it this way , you ' ve begged the question . As to why philosophers still dispute arguments for or against the existence of God , it may be worth noting that most of them don ' t , but anyway , those who do presumably think that understanding those arguments helps us to understand the warrant and significant or lack thereof of theism . They may also be interested in disputing such arguments for historical reasons , to better understand these arguments as historical phenomena , or something like this , but that ' s presumably tangential to the issue you ' re asking about .