Why are SOME conservatives so against the idea of fossil fuel use contributing to harmful consequences of the planet ? I understand wanting to use till the last drop but how can anyone deny it ' s harmful to the planet ? <| sep |> probably best to pass on the girl u just met huffing co 2 in the park <| sep |> They could certainly say it , having experienced a whole different sense they would have an authority on what they see when compared to a blind person . They could try and explain what they see . They could express how seeing made them feel and how it shapes their experience . In doing so all of these things would be true because they experiential and subjective . But for them to express the complexity of the senses then it could be that they have a good understanding of the biology , the physics of light , the brain and how it takes a energy wave and coverts it into objects , memories , feelings and so on . For them to assume that people assume the complexity is less then the ' reality ' is in my humble opinion the ego ' s way of saying you know more then these people becuase you know how complex the senses are . . . But unless one knows that complexity they are talking out of thier butt . If they dont understand it or only have a partial inderstanding then that in itself is not complexity it is that their understanding is incomplete complexity may be a barrier to understanding I am arguing semantics . Ill admit it . Personally i would say that the senses are complex and that many people dont understand or dont care to understand how they work . They are happy to use their senses and that is enough for them . Complex or simple are not relevant if one does not consider the mechanics or detailed workings . Have many peoples assumptions been assumed ?