I read the title with Marka Ragnos ' voice . Haven ' t touched the game in 10 years too . Edit eh , close enough 3 m 53 s <| sep |> I think it ' d be problematic for a lot of the same reasons it was problematic in BLC . If SLS chooses 3 v 3 as the main mode , then a 2 v 2 unranked mode would cannibalize the 3 v 3 queues and split the matchmaking , even if we have the current system of queueing for both . Every player who chooses to only queue for 2 v 2 ends up detracting from the 3 v 3 queues by making the 2 v 2 queues faster . We ' ll also see a lot of player complaints about balance from those who play 2 v 2 . No matter what you tell them that the game is meant to be balanced around 3 v 3 the 2 v 2 players will not like it and complain . This happened a lot in BLC . But mostly , in my view , it comes down to newbie first impressions . If the game only offers 3 v 3 queues , it sets a certain expectation for anyone who checks out the game this is how the game is meant to be played , this is what I need to learn . 2 v 2 is so different from 3 v 3 that it ' s detrimental for a newbie to learn in 2 v 2 and then graduate to 3 v 3 it ' s not really that simple of a transition . Most likely they will grow accustomed to 2 v 2 , fail the transition to 3 v 3 , and either complain or quit .