I work at TMobile , call centers are stressful as hell but we ' ve got a great group of people here and the paybenefits aren ' t too shabby . <| sep |> No offense , but what am I supposed to be looking for here ? ' Edit uptime is 3 years <| sep |> Considering my fines for possession were about that amount in fines and court costs , they got off lightly <| sep |> Do you like Nuhai Riveon ? And would u suck him for 200 $ Since that is all he has right now <| sep |> I thought ASP was the maid but honestly I don ' t really know her looks very well so I could be way off <| sep |> this is great . my uncle never played video games and he loved rush of blood with the move controllers D <| sep |> in reaction to the electionBut . Uploaded on Nov 7 , 2011 In response to you , though it ' s to give each region a say in the election , and to ensure that their needs are being heard , without only one or two States receiving attention . That ' s just another way of saying that it protects the small states from only one or two big states receiving attention . and not necessarily in a way that ' s more representative of the nationExcept it would be more representative of the nation , since MOST Americans live in urban areas , and urbanization is only growing . Switching to popular votes ensures that the majority of Americans will like the results of the election . How about cooperating to find a solution that lets all States get a sayHow about cooperating to find a solution that lets all PEOPLE get a say ? I have this radical view that people should decide issues and not states . The way it works now , Republicans in California , or New York , or New England , or Illinois , etc . and Democrats in Texas , the Mountain states , the South , etc . get absolutely no say in the election . The Electoral College could be improved . It could be actually based on population instead of congresspeople , it could NOT award its points in a winnertakeall fashion . But this all just basically points towards just switching to the popular vote . There ' s no reason not to allow the majority of people to choose the president directly , instead of having these cases where the one that the American people picked ended up losing out to the guy that got less people , but in more strategic places . It ' s not right . If the results of this election remained exactly the same , but some of the same people from California happened to live in Wisconsin or Michigan or Pennsylvania instead , Clinton would ' ve won , with no other changes . States should not have more rights than the people in them .