I had to pull another girl aside at my work for asking this to another coworker who I am good friends with . She had opened up to me about how she had missed carried a few years before me and now that I am pregnant people are asking her when she ' s going to start having kids . I feel badly for her and I pulled my coworker aside and gave her the down low about asking rudepersonal questions like that . <| sep |> Pretty sure they wont release it because it was something tied back to around the first season , it would be like them realeasing king rammus for sale . While itd be cool itd piss alot of older players off since the skins were orginally released to be collecter items <| sep |> Bless you , sir . I will say the REASON I used Radar , NOT change . org , for my petition was because I knew the chances of it landing even 1000 signees quickly was exactly zilch . . The Radar approach has three real benefits 1 . Radar tickets can quietly build up over time , whereas a change . org petition has to make a big splash from the start or else it looks like nobody cares . 2 . Only Apple can see what the tally is , so a low count won ' t embarrass AppleScript in public . Whereas a public statement by AppleScript ' s own customers that there ' s only 150 of them left is handing PR GOLD to whatever climbing young UI and IPC teams want to exploit this opportunity to sell Apple on their own hot new products , e . g . Siri , App Extensions . 3 . Radar tickets that say We want THESE features tell Apple in terms they understand and do care about ! why the current products haven ' t been landing the tens of thousands of influential new users e . g . programmers as expected . That gives them a clear , positive direction in which to go , should they be persuaded to give it just one more go . Users crying Please don ' t kill the products we ' ve already got is utterly useless , because Apple has already done all the math on what it ' s going to cost them to dump that handful of old customers in order to purse the potentially massive number of new customers it could win with a completely different approach . The let ' s all dupe the same feature requests approach is deliberately designed to say to Apple Why throw out 25 years of existing infrastructure , just to take all the time and risk of starting over again from scratch with completely u n p rovenuntestednotevenbuilt Grand Ambitions ? Especially when you ' ve just had to throw out all the last lot coughApple Carcough ? How about we tell you how you can win a new audience for your existing investment , for free ! , and finally start to recoup your costs , and build new markets on top of that ? . So now that foolish public , reactive i . e . negative ! petition is out there , IT needs to win 10 , 000 signatures just by Christmas just to maintain its credibility , whereas mine could afford to build up maybe a thousand over time and motivated Apple far morecos , unlike handwringing displays , stacks of new Radar tickets is something they do understand . And once there , of course , we can start selling them on the next One More Thing ourselves # WhatWouldSteveDo