All solutions brought up by government climate researchers generally are based in massive government expansion . It ' s silly to assume that there isn ' t a conflict of interest there , especially since the US government is the biggest polluting entity in existence . Want less pollution ? Fight against deficit spending , as it ' s simply more consumption now at the expense of the futureboth economically , and environmentally . Besides , if warming ever actually becomes an issue , cloud seeding is more than capable of being an extremely cheap , effective solution to cool the earth . Wasn ' t there also some research that was even accepted by government climate scientists that showed that the cost of dealing with the effects of climate change is cheaper than the cost of potentially curbing a slight amount of the effects ?