ohhh greatt D <| sep |> When I DM I do two things before every game , the first is to take an inordinate amount of time before anyone shows up setting up my entire DM setup screen computer , which dice I want to use that night . Write any last minute notes . The second is to down a shot , it ' s the only drink I ' ll have all night , but it helps calm the nerves before I find my groove . <| sep |> thanks a ton <| sep |> please try ebay . i bought one on the 20 th for 121 dollarsprice might have went up now and it arrives on monday . got tracking 2 days after my order . <| sep |> Jogging trousers and hoodies too 😂 <| sep |> I disagree , authorities definitely can label ShapeShift as a money transmitter and impose regulations . It ' s cost effective to regulate businesses of any size that exchange fiat . It is NOT cost effective read possible to effectively regulate small to medium sized businesses that exchange cryptocurrency . Yes , Shapeshift has a high profile . It is possible to regulate Shapeshift because the proprietor is very well known . The service that replaces Shapeshift after it is regulated won ' t be easy to regulate , and because there is no need for a bank account , there ' s really no straightforward way to enforce regulations . egold and liberty reserve exchanged US dollars for centralized virtual currency . They did NOT exchange decentralized virtual currency for other decentralized virtual currency . You are confused . A cryptocurrency needs to be big to be strong . There is a reason why hundreds of millions of dollars are spent on Bitcoin mining . A new decentralized cryptocurrency won ' t be secure . Duh . If a transition was necessary , and we don ' t have any idea if it would be , it wouldn ' t happen overnight . The transition would be much more like what we are seeing with Monero and dark markets . I don ' t know if that trend will continue , but that ' s how it would happen , likely over the course of several years . Alternatively , it could also be a simple hard fork of the main cryptocurrency , with miners moving to the new fork if they operate in jurisdictions outside the control of the powers forcing centralization on the main currency . I was a coauthor of several academic papers . Adademic puffery ? While you were researching papers , I was living this stuff . I now understand your compulsion to theorize about the future instead of rolling up your sleeves and seeing what really happens . That ' s not a personal attack , but it is a very academic way of approaching problems . Unfortunately , you don ' t build successful decentralized cryptocurrencies with research . You build them with code , an investment ecosystem , regulatory systems , and messy internal politics . Sitting with our thumb up our $$ tinkering with the code and puffing our chests and stoking our egos while pretending we are smart and ' planning ' for risks years into the future is an express oneway pass straight down the crapper for Bitcoin .