3 dot is enough for her as I have seen . <| sep |> At least Iowa has plenty of present tense space in their trophy case buddy ! <| sep |> Dude ' s gotta go . No way around it . <| sep |> The Monsters of jungle and creeps are two different kind of minions , so when a jungler enters vision , and then goes to fog of war , the number of either his monster CS or lane CS gets hidden , so his farm would go 8050 Jungle Creeps 30 Lane Creeps to 50 Jungle Creeps only . This is a bug . CS not updating while anyone is outside of vision is not a bug . <| sep |> Cook ' s paper has been so thoroughly refuted it is now the laughing stock of the climate community . 97 Articles Refuting The 97 % Consensusarticlesrefuting 97 consensus . htmlSummary Cook et al . 2013 attempted to categorize 11 , 944 abstracts brief summaries of papers not entire papers to their level of endorsement of AGW and found 7930 66 % held no position on AGW . While only 65 papers 0 . 5 % explicitly endorsed and quantified AGW as 50 % Humans are the primary cause . A later analysis by Legates et al . 2013 found there to be only 41 papers 0 . 3 % that supported this definition . Cook et al . ' s methodology was so fatally flawed that they falsely classified skeptic papers as endorsing AGW , apparently believing to know more about the papers than their authors . The second part of Cook et al . 2013 , the author selfratings simply confirmed the worthlessness of their methodology , as they were not representative of the sample since only 4 % of the authors 1189 of 29 , 083 rated their own papers and of these 63 % disagreed with the abstract ratings . Methodology The data 11 , 944 abstracts used in Cook et al . 2013 came from searching the Web of Science database for results containing the key phrases ' global warming ' or ' global climate change ' regardless of what type of publication they appeared in . Only a small minority of these were actually published in climate science journals , instead the publications included ones like the International Journal Of Vehicle Design , Livestock Science and Waste Management . The results were not even analyzed by scientists but rather incompetent amateurs with credentials such as zoo volunteer and scuba diving . They were chosen by the lead author John Cook a cartoonist because they all comment on his deceptively named , alarmist blog ' Skeptical Science ' and could be counted on to push his manufactured talking point .