Why would you want to call it civil union ? Also what is the LGBT agenda ? <| sep |> Doesn ' t work . I have tested it with the following setup and configuration CM 13 Default CM 13 Root Switch , Xposed CM 13 Root Switch , without Xposed MIUI 8 Rooted Will try Magisk tomorrow . <| sep |> People really over exaggerate over this games toxicity . <| sep |> Utter nonsense . Any fool can put up a bunch of crudely painted futures , but it takes the Guardian to publish them . As these tropes seem to infest the Internet , let ' s look at them . 1 Automation as the primary source of abundance . Automation is a cost reduction tool and a means to make products uniform . It does not say why something is made or even what is to be made . As has occurred since mass manufacture took over from craft work in the 1890 s , costs fall , quality rises and old products are superseded both by better ways of delivering the same functionality and supplemented by new things . If you turn up the knob on this , as we have done throughout the past 120 years , you see pronounced changes in how production is organised , but you will see no great change in why they are organised in that way . The economic engine isn ' t predicated upon the act of production that is necessary , but the overall system is a far more complex and subtle thing . If you removed low skill labour input to the productive process as we have done in industry after industry it makes essentially no difference to the economic wiring diagram of the process overall . The structure pumps out value added , which is then distributed and consumed or reinvested in complex ways that keep the entire structure turning over . Life is so different today from 1890 , yet the economics which describe both periods has changed not at all . 2 Abundance and the ownership of the means of production . Progressives see a simple chain that automation will drive out workers , that workers will no longer have earnings from work , therefore value added will accrue to the owners of the means of production . That raises a dichotomy do the workers then starve , or does a kindly state seize the means of production or the profits from production and distribute them to the smiling masses ? Answer to satisfy progressive bet your butt they do . So the future is just like the welfarist past , but without the need to do dull old work . Hurrah ! cried Zoidberg . You can criticise this at two levels . You can accept the model and then point to a dozen obstacles to its realisation , at least in the next 35 years . Actually nearer eight billion obstacles , the industrial countries being about a billion people in nine by the 2050 s A much more cogent critique is simply this in the old industrial nations , where all of these forces are at their most advanced , employment has never been higher . Transfers from the wealth producers to the rest of society have never been more extreme . Jobs are coming into existence that were unheard of a generation ago . The downside is that this has disproportionately rewarded not the owners of capital which is not a limiting factor for commerce but those with high skills and useful knowledge . This returns to the basic and divisive point that whereas the ' old ' scheme of mass manufacture had a role for everyone , those of the new world don ' t and that the emerging economies have numerically far more of the desirable skills than do the old rich world . So global politics are going to turn upside down as the new economies trash to the old industrial ones . They will be responsible for at a conservative figure three quarters of global output by 2050 . This points to two different kinds of tension as between the old and new global powers , and as between the cognitive elite in any one country and its lumpen . You can easily envisage a world of perhaps a hundred highly automated cities , each intensely specialised , populated only by the elites who can afford to live in them , ach actively regulating and managing commerce so as to attract the next wave of technology , to draw in the best people to live in them . These are cities like organisms , engaged in a deadly struggle for the resource that they need knowledge , organisation , talent . Set around these cities are the remnants of the old political nations , unable to touch the golden eggs but coaxing and extracting whatever taxes they can to keep the hinterland functioning . This need not be unpleasant they could be resorts , retirement locations , pleasant and well policed zones of tranquillity in which small scale commerce , crafts and services will ply their trade . But the river into which all these little mills will dip their wheels flows down from the commanding urban magic mountain at the nation ' s heart . Some , though , will be extremely unpleasant . These cities will not be spread around evenly . Much of the world will be turbulent and unstable . Nations that grasp too hard after their elite ' s wealth , or which circle their wagons and block trade , technology or worrying opinions will quickly come to resemble the last years of the Soviet Union and its aftermath .