I didn ' t attack the sources Clicked hoping to see a post void of hyperbole and strong on facts . You do realise by saying the points made aren ' t backed up by strong facts , you are kinda attacking the sources . right ? <| sep |> That ' s a reciprocating saw , not a knife . <| sep |> I was going to reply with some snarky remark that obviously Jo Cox had gone out of her way to influence this specific house , but honestly it ' s too depressing . I can ' t believe I ' m saying this , but it ' s made me lose respect for the Mail . I knew they were foul , obviously , but I didn ' t realise they ' d stoop so low as to reverse their position on benefits for the sake of defending this . Tells you a lot about what they think their readers want to hear , really .