ah , here you are my 7 % crewcampaigners woop woop <| sep |> just make mage hero power cost 3 Keepo <| sep |> I don ' t quite follow . I feel as if this relies heavily on how we define Truth and perhaps we are operating with different definitions . I am familiar with the idea of duality and how it is still yet a division of the whole . What I don ' t see is the distinction between TrueFalse being this sort of a classic duality . I feel as if there is perhaps some conflation between RightWrong and TrueFalse here , which leads to my puzzling over your definition of truth . One can say something is Good or Bad , and we can say something is Right or Wrong . But at the end of the day what we call GoodBad or RightWrong is defined contextually , and often is dependent on sociocultural arrangements . They are not actual things . However , TruthFalsehood is not the same here . Truth , at least as I view it , indicates something that is an absolute quantity or quality of the universe around us in some way that is independent of us . Regardless of the word we use to define the color of the sky , the sky is a color that the English language calls blue . Regardless of whether we are aware , the Earth does in fact orbit a star , our sun and will continue to do so no matter how we define it . There are things that remain constant from an objective perspective and are actually not subjective . These things are considered True . At the end of the day , I don ' t see how True is a duality . There are things that exist , and you could define a list of things that don ' t exist the False . However this is the defining note of Truth When we describe dualities for other things , such as RightWrong there exists actually nothing there that is objective or absolute , they are subjective , empty sets . That is that they are entirely fabricated . They are not True but we choose to define them as true . But when we go back to the set of Truth , everything in there is not fabricated , it is True . Therefore when we seek to collapse the duality into a singularity , unlike other sets , we cannot acknowledge that both are fabrications since Truth is True it is a collection of absolutes , so we are with only one thing all along . There is no False in light of True . So the way I see it , looking for truth isn ' t remotely a fabrication or duality , it ' s about removing the fabrications and understanding the singularity that is Truth . It ' s about completeness . Though I perhaps didn ' t entirely understand what you were getting at , since you wrote profoundly less than I have . As previously stated , I do still believe this is likely a difference in definition . Perhaps you could elaborate more ? I would appreciate that .