but 50 years ago ? yes , you could lose your family , friends , job all that for leaving many other religions here in Canada , Today its not an nearly as much issue , even with this man , he was free to leave it and the only issue was from countries socially cut off from the rest of the world . <| sep |> It ' s not being gullible . If you have the money then more power to you . If you don ' t care for cosmetics then how do the prices affect you ? <| sep |> Nuking the middle east is still a stupid idea . <| sep |> Ah yes , the infamous Danerys Targaryen <| sep |> Little kids laugh at random things all the time . <| sep |> Really ? That ' s what you took away from this ? <| sep |> It was never public . <| sep |> Well the simple answer is that we don ' t just use the Pauli Exclusion Principle to predict things in QM . That ' s a small subset of quantum objects that obey those properties . It only applies to fermions . For example the Pauli Exclusion Principle says nothing about bosons yet we can make accurate predictions about their quantum behaviour . The Pauli Exclusion Principle fundamentally relies on our mathematical construction of what we call a fermion and we know that if the Pauli Exclusion Principle does not apply to the object then that object cannot be a fermion and then obeys other rules . I would argue that in the way you are positing your question that ' s exactly what the PEP does . It categorizes things into different quantum systems . As an example we can predict superfluidity and superconductivity two very macroscopic quantum effects that can be readily measured without ever invoking PEP .