This kind of post is exactly why I think DNMNoobs is overkill . All that sub does is make new users believe that they need fucking top notch vendorsellingouncesofcoke OPSEC . <| sep |> I quit reading after Sessions being a white supremacist . Who was he complaining about with secretary of education ? Carson ? <| sep |> The window ? Literally the only thing in the pictures that changes ? <| sep |> Lucky you , we can ' t swim in any water off the east coast , it just smells like nasty ass tea spices <| sep |> DBP ? ok , password ? <| sep |> Yeah Johnny is listed at 5 ' 9 which I have a hard time believing . Apparently DeBrincat outweighs Johnny by about 15 pounds though haha . <| sep |> I ' ve tried using both to no avail . <| sep |> The Internet is more complicated that the simple models we use to teach networking . There are routers , buffers , and advanced algorithms at play that determine how to prioritize or drop packets . Multiple open channels from one host to another can cause these pieces to deprioritize some of the traffic , especially when a router has to deal with multiple clients e . g . your ISP if not your home router . The user ' s PC can also have a variety of antivirus or firewall configurations that bite . Cellular and Wifi networks have weird prioritization rules that differ heavily from wired connections . Home routers often have packet classifiers that try to find and prioritize game and streaming traffic over browsing or bulk downloads . Other routers can try to prioritize one or two channels over all others due to how TCP packet loss works e . g . , it may be better to let all packets from channel A through while preferring to drop those of channel B for a short time , then alternating , so each channel has alternating peak throughput rather than constant mediocre throughput . A single channel can get the same throughput but a higher priority . That said , you ' re looking for latency rather than throughput , so maybe your approach works well . but you haven ' t proven it yet . It ' s all a bit vague because different routers or different ISP hardware can be configured or manufactured to use entirely different algorithms or strategies for packet prioritization , so it may work phenomenally for one user and very badly for another . Testing and measuring is important to us engineering types . Intuition and clever ideas often fail hard when put to the test .