And you ' re going on about some stones from a short gif , for maybe one planet . Cuts both ways . Lots of people have found them , you just need to know where to look . It ' s all in game and playable regardless of your views . No tech demos , no short gif from which to draw comparisons . <| sep |> I can see it . <| sep |> I ' ve removed one set and swapped the side on the flatter ones Esentially flipped them upside down . It really helps from a comfort point of view . I ' ve tried using air roll , it ' s not analogue enough for me , I ' d really recommend trying with boost on them , it allows for the fast double jump takeoff really easily . <| sep |> They can ' t even get Starc and Hazlewood right <| sep |> I agree that a socially acceptable explanation is pretty important . However , there are a whole lot of stagnant , messed up people out there who have perfectly reasonable excuses . The I just wanted to be single for once guy could potentially be more screwed up than the I ' m kind of a late bloomer guy . On the surface , they are both just excuses . I recognise that women would probably prefer the story of the experienced guy over the late bloomer , but words don ' t provide the complete picture . I think that an honest , engaging , sensual virgin could actually be more compelling than a hardened , disconnected , desperate divorced guy . I may notice when someone I meet is lazy , unadventurous , or completely disconnected from hisher body . These aren ' t attractive traits to me , regardless of history . I really notice when someone is engaged , generous and well connected to hisher body . Though not hugely accurate , I definitely judge people on these things before learning their history . I don ' t think all women in their 30 s and 40 s are looking for a perfect relationship resume , provided the man can first engage her with more significant desirable traits .