Yes , I realize that few people use the correct scientific terms and instead circlejerk their identity to encompass their sexual choices and preferences . <| sep |> blushychangelingFeels the pleasure radiating off of her , feeding off of it , basking in it . sprchangeling . you know . I don ' t really mind being a deviant if you don ' t . spConfirmed I am going to Hell . <| sep |> Sorry fam , I always get my answers here tho <| sep |> Interesting . The other option poeple discuss is keeping the EC with the same number of votes per state , but dividing the EC voters proportionally instead of winner take all . That would mean that you still have voters in smaller states having a greater weight than larger , to force politicians to focus on everywhere not just big population centers , but votes in every state would matter more . In the current scenario , people in reliably Democratic or Republican states like California or Texas don ' t really feel like their vote matters , whereas votes everywhere would matter if the EC was allocated proportionally . Some people did the math on this on Stack E x c h a n g e w o u l d h a v e w o n t h e p r e s i d e n c y i f a l l s t a t e s e l e ctorswereallocatedproport , and it turns out there ' s a lot of different methods for the seemingly simple method of allocating votes proportionally like this , but with all of them , she had a slight lead in EC votes BUT neither candidate got to 270 because 3 rd party candidates actually picked up a few votes with this method .