Of course , at trial under cross examination , AC claims he never saw the bloody finger . Its interesting to note that defense was trying to establish his opportunity to know . He would say he didn ' t know , even if he did , so the answer was not an event . nbsp AC ' s visit is documented in two police reports , as is JL ' s . None of the reports were written by them . AC wrote a report a few months later . Also , AC told investigators he didn ' t know what he did on 11042005 , his day off . Later he testified on direct that he did , and had an innocuous alibi . nbsp AC and JL want us to believe they did not focus in on SA prior to the RAV 4 being found , but that is beyond belief to me . They were both deposed in the law suit against TK and DV that month . They were among the first three LEOs to visit SA ' s house . They both visited ASY prior to the RAV 4 being found . They didn ' t write reports and they claimed to have found nothing , nicht , nada . nbsp In the midst of this , after AC spent the entire night of 11032005 going to ASY and then GZ ' s then calling in TH ' s license plate , we are supposed to believe he took the day of 11042005 off and didn ' t even think about the ongoing search . nbsp This is the day that JL accompanies MW and visits SA in the morning , then disappears from police records . This is the day with the mysterious 22 phone calls to RH . This is the day of the first flyover , and this is the day the RAV 4 is suspected of being moved . nbsp Where was AC , and where was JL ? Where indeed .