Bigger or not , I don ' t think that guy will be back next year . <| sep |> My work makes rosemary parmesian bread loaves . <| sep |> I scrolled through most of the post and its mostly geeky shit and joe roganbill burrOpie deserves a mention as the best sleep inducing show , radio veterans dont get any respect . sniff <| sep |> So you saying if your dad never kicked you out , you ' d try to fuck your mother and sisters ? <| sep |> I have a 12 year old account $ 10 and its all yoursadd my skype vestrodogeMy steam is the 12 year old account <| sep |> I can ' t view the link right now , but it ' s the infamous slip isn ' t it ? <| sep |> The argument isn ' t about whether the subarchetypes are different , it ' s about whether or not you can properly separate them and have meaningful estimates of their win ratespower level . Believe it or not , some Malygos Rogues play Conceal . Most Malygos lists also don ' t run Evolved Kobold . Barnes is also quite common in Questing lists . The amount of overlap is massive and their patterns of play can be very similar , they are much more alike than Aggro and Midrange Shaman in that respect . The only cards that are quite reliable in separating the archetypes are QACold Blood and MalygosEmperorSinister Strike . That ' s a problem . If they were early game cards that didn ' t carry such selection bias , it wouldn ' t be a problem . This has nothing to do with the amount of data . You could have 10 times more games , the issue would remain .