Agreed . I posted multiple bugs during the PTS for both 1 . 5 and survival and it still made it through . I think alot it has to do with people flooding the forums with the armor vs ead debate mixed with the holidays fast approaching . They wanted to just push this out as fast as possible . <| sep |> Eric , your paper has been linked to NSF . . On a quick read , it doesn ' t appear any of your points could not be answered . It appears they were dismissed more than answered to me . Several relevant points were made , but none that couldn ' t be answered . Either by data that was left out or by a rerun of the test bed . I think she is implying that more testing might answer these questions rather than they were already answered , but I ' m not sure . seashell . I think the EW paper is the best piece of research on the EmDrive that we have seen to date . Being overly critical of every paragraph is time consuming and slows down progress . It is what it is . Risk taking and notknowing are what drives the ball forward . IMO , EW did a great job , better than anyone else has done at trying to resolve potential errors . emphasis mine StarOne