I played it on win 7 32 bit . Don ' t know why it shouldn ' t work on 8 tbh <| sep |> IGN Luke Deposited WhismurF 8 Requesting Sableye GTS Message Swimbobluke <| sep |> Barrier is not even the biggest change or anything . Sure it is good but the actual HUGE change is her ultimate . 75 more shield for 50 m radius ignoring LoS . This is huge . <| sep |> Where do you miss the point that these aren ' t their crops ? Not their seeds , not their water , not their land , not their crops . And what makes it his ? The fact that he has a private security force that ' ll kill anyone who disagrees ? Again , this is sounding a lot like a government to me . Hell , pretty soon it won ' t even be their labor because robots will do all the picking and dullard hand labor . It ' s downright generous of the farm owner to humor them with a job rather than just get a robot to do it . You ' re describing a dystopia . Only under capitalism does automation lead to suffering and starvation . With communal ownership of capital automation would instead lead to incredible prosperity as everyone benefits from the robot ' s labor instead of a small few people . We ' ve recognized private capital since the stone agesNo we haven ' t . Tribal man is incredibly communal in it ' s ownership , both in the stone ages and now . It was only when society became stratified that private capital became a thing . If another Neanderthal came to take it , he would recognize this as theft . Tribal man shared their resources and capital . Also of note is the distinction between private and personal property , but that ' s not really relevant in a tribal society . Humans will always recognize private property and capital ownership . Quite the assumption . Got any proof ? Revolutionary Ukraine , Revolutionary Catalonia , the Zapatistas , and the Rojava Kurds would beg to differ . The former two were unfortunately murdered by the USSR , but not being able to stand up to a country many times your size is not a failing of internal economics . They are drains , and a good society would breed these people out of the gene pool through natural selection as they fail to produce and add value . And now you ' re arguing eugenics . I think I might just call it quits here if you ' re really going to push this unscientific angle . I ' ll argue your other points , but don ' t try this one .