How do we know this is true and that uspez didn ' t just edit this post ? <| sep |> No escape from shitposts <| sep |> No , I didn ' t ignore it . It ' s not talking about this study . Just to be clear , this is the study you ' re calling bullshit on R o l e o f B r e e d i nDogBiteRiskandPrevention . aspxThe first summary table alone cites more than 30 data sets , and 21 of those are from hospital records . None are from news sources or media studies . The bibliography cites 65 sources so I ' m to assume you went through and read up on the methodology behind each study and concluded every single one were based on media reports only ? It also doesn ' t say anything about there being issues with the data . I mean , a peer reviewed study in the 150 year old AVMA generally means a team of veterinary scientists looked everything over and judged it to be worth publishing , but you ' re a guy on the internet so I ' m sure you ' re the best scientist in the world .