That ' s lame . Mine still works fine . Except that one of the screw heads had been stripped out since day one and I can ' t switch it from tip down to tip up like I ' d prefer . <| sep |> They have an interesting amount of magical protection . So that could be funny . <| sep |> And this is why people with half a brain never let the internet name anything . <| sep |> Which is fine I guess . As long as it isn ' t made poorly <| sep |> Let ' s see here men have lower educational attainment , higher earlier death rates , lower longevity , higher incarceration rates , a higher victimization of crime rate , lower government spending and programs for them as a group , lower wealth control , lower voting electorate control , and a higher tax burden paid relative to women in the USI ' ve got all this already , no problems there . My main beef here is the using most blinded metrics used to judge the health of a cohort . Can you show me where these metrics are defined , and how they arrived at those metrics , either to the exclusion of other metrics , or showing that they have included all relevant metrics ? Simply because every time we do this , it takes quite a bit to dig up that research , and then the person to whom I respond often basically goes radio silent or had no interest in the data in the first placeDon ' t worry , this is data I would want , and probably reuse if I found it of good quality , from what I ' ve seen , we ' re coming from similar angles on this . The thing is , I ' ve tried to be clear on saying that I don ' t see a single group as clearly oppressed or worse off , and your claims seems to be very much edging towards something that easily could be strawmanned into women have it good , men have it bad . And I ' ll just throw down the promise now that I ' ll respond . I ' m about to take a long weekend , so it might be a few days at worst , but I ' m intending to look at what you ' ve got , and if possible , reply with constructive criticism .