Here ' s the actual studyprimarynewscoverage 2016 trumpclintonsanders # ftnref 22 Note that the study itself seems to argue to the contrary of the linked article , although they ' re measuring whether Sanders was mentioned favorably and not how much coverage he got , which makes absolutely no sense , given they measure airtime for the GOP candidates . Both the article and the study reek of biases leaning in opposite directions . <| sep |> I appreciate it your advice ! I definitely plan on shooting and stuff once I get the opportunity . I just purchased the G 19 talo edition from rural king ! I ' ll be able to test it on my buddies farm . Worst case scenario , it ' s a lesson learned . I ' m not too worried about it though ! <| sep |> you first