contact support if you bought on PSN . Normally you have 30 day any shop or store . <| sep |> Seriously , I thought these guys had a major stiffy for anything Russian . <| sep |> Yeah u shoul do like 1 . Sticker num 1 x 35 k , 3 . Sticker num 2 x 5 . Etc . that would be faster and mb more profit <| sep |> It ' s really disgusting if you consider that this is gluttony and overconsumption . And on Black Friday we should reflect on that and not spend money on more crap . <| sep |> Strictly speaking , there is no relation horseshoe relates sentences , while superset relates sets . However , there is a frustrating relation between them , once we recognise that each sentence may be associated with some set . Let Sp be the set of models in which the sentence p is true . Then Sp q where '' is the horseshoe is the set S ~ p Sq where '' is set union . Now suppose that p q is a logical truth , i . e . p q . So p q is true in all models . This is equivalent to p entails q , i . e . p q . So any model in which p is true is a model in which q is true . Then Sp Sq where '' is the subset relation . It ' s frustrating that the directions of the symbols go in opposite directions . By the way , the fact that horseshoe '' is a source of potential confusion , since it looks exactly like the proper superset relation , is why many logicians prefer to use '' rather than horseshoe '' for the material conditional . TLDR p q if and only if Sp Sq , where Sp is the set of models in which p is true .