Original post by uAuir 2 blaze in rsilentmoviegifsnbspThis crosspost was performed automatically as a part of the ImagesOfNetwork . Learn more about the ImagesOfNetwork , how you can help , and other Frequently Asked Questions , or visit us on Discord ! Remove my post ! The bot got this one wrong ! Stop Crossposting My Stuff ! # match 1924 <| sep |> f i c t i o n o f n e a l a s h e rssciencepartoneGenerally I totally agree with you regarding author ' s views . For example I read the Ender ' s Game series before I knew what an asshole Orson Scott Card was , and I am still glad I read it since it was a great series and oddly completely contrary to some of Orson Scott Card ' s political views . However climate change is different for me in a couple of ways . It ' s far more significant to the future survival of humanity and the life on this planet , and it is not really debatable that manmade climate change is real . The evidence is so astoundingly clear , straightforward , and obvious that people who deny it are being willfully ignorant . I would say that things like nuclear testing or the other policies of the Bush administration can be rationally debated , but not anthropogenic climate change . Science fiction writers should be intelligent enough to figure that out themselves and debatepredict what should be done about it , not whether it exists or not . Plumbers are not doing something related to politics though unless they are draining the swamp , climate change on the other hand is directly relevant to any science fiction author writing about humanity ' s future and they absolutely can have an impact on their audience ' s views on the subject .