If you ' ve ever been hunting , you know head shots aren ' t instant deaths . The only time I ever killed an animal with one bullet was when I shot a rabbit right through the shoulder and through the heart or spine I assume . <| sep |> I used the same LA Galaxy players too ! But I have Liverpool up top . <| sep |> At this point it ' s borderline reckless to put him in the same sentence as Doughty . Let that soak in for a minute <| sep |> Just ' ave a look here . <| sep |> There are plenty in the UK . Although a lot of Mexican food is just something normal we make at home . <| sep |> Do you have the network card in a passthrough config for the pfSense vm ? Not have to . I just created two bridges the first one already got auto confed and assigned them to the VM . Done proxmox config pfsense config Why not use URL filters on the proxy ? As stated before Haven ' t got the time for it . Also I have to think about how to capture traffic as well . In transparent mode it only gets http traffic . Which nullifies googleyoutubefacebook . I set it up last week , but it went into a mess not working properly . So I deinstalled it and want to redo it , when I have time . Since I accidentally deleted two big downloads all what I did today was downloading and setting up stuff . So the proxy becomes a point on my ToDo list for the next LAN I ' m guessing this set up is just for a small group of friends ? This perticular one . yes ' ish . Those dudes are hosting a LAN every 3 4 months . Usually its somewhat around 15 to 20 people . But also featured partys with up to 40 people . They want to get back to those counts over time . For that they now wanted to have a server after they saw how nice it is to have some after I brought mine . Thank god , I moved here in time and prevented some weird desktop budget shit thing and helped to get this one starting . I ' m currently looking into a similar set up but for a larger group , say 3040 people . If youwe can get the proxy starting , then this setup can easily serve somewhat around 50 to 80 people effectively with services and game servers . On our bigger parties 200 up to ~ 600 we usually split those servers up . Especially firewall , LAN cache , proxy , shaper , etc . On one of my lan admin groups last parties a friend ran a proxmox cluster with 3 nodes and a SSD SAN . The firewall went extra , everything else ran on this cluster . Worked like a charm . The great thing behind Proxmox is that you can scale it this easily . So when your setup becomes to small , then you just add in another server and you are good to go for more My biggest worry is the network card dying out when handling that much trafficI know what you mean . But we do not feature any download servers on it . I think that the LAN cache should definately become a system by its own . On this LAN I don ' t have this luxuary . So I have to include it onto the system . But when you put that aside , then its pretty easy . If you like to , you could make a bound from 2 or 3 ethernet ports to increase traffic capabilities . But beside this , what bigger traffic goes through that , which requires 10 Gbit ? You have WAN access highly depends on what you have on your site System servers F i r e w a l l D N S D H C P ProxyIRCTeamspeakwhatever else Game serversI think that one single Gbit card can handle 50 to 80 people easily without any bigger downloads . If it goes down , you could easily add a network card and get a bond with 2 or 3 interfaces which makes more than enough room for it . Beside of that you add a LAN cache and other traffic heavy devices to your backbone switch and you are good to go . But I can let you know how things are going this weekend ! Please keep in mind , that those dudes are highly on budget . So additional servers won ' t occure this quick in the near future if I don ' t find another deal like this one g . host an infosec CTFUhm . you got me off guard . and all of my attention