I think he was probably remembering this clip 10 m 2 s <| sep |> real one spotted <| sep |> as stated above you dont get a shortcut if you dont use it . and you cant use it if you dont find it <| sep |> What does the dlc have or do ? <| sep |> Ah , I understand <| sep |> BU is irrelevant , BU can go ahead and fork off , or BU needs to be attacked . Which is it ? <| sep |> What I would like is a MP game that has a weekly playing time , lets say two hours every Sunday . I love playing this in multiplayer but I never have 56 Hours in one sitting to finishing a game . <| sep |> Looking forward to it , looks neat ! <| sep |> Fordi at flaskerne ikke bliver indleveret til genbrug . Troede ikke pantsystemet var s svrt at forst . <| sep |> This is simply pointing to the fact that if you describe a card as this costs 3 but is actually good against twin then you are implicitly acknowledging that 3 cmc cards aren ' t usually good against twin . There ' s nothing scientific about that , it ' s just that when someone has to specify that a card is actually okay against twin , then their own personal opinion is that similar cards are not good enough . I was not under the impression that casting two 11 flying tokens was a particularly powerful play against Twin ' s potential turn 3 . 5 kill . However , when the situation is examined more closely , it is observed that the rule does not apply to this caseAs for this , it usually means that you didn ' t read your rule properly , or that the rule is not perfect . In this case , the rule of 3 cmc sorceries are bad against twin is incomplete which should be obvious . Then the rule isn ' t being proved but merely being shown to be incomplete or inaccurate .