No problem , enjoy ! <| sep |> it was the latinos <| sep |> Looks great man , any progress pictures ? <| sep |> I came to the comments just to find out . <| sep |> Classic example of cherry picking data . They pick up the one data set where there is inconsistent sampling methods and exploit that inconsistency to prove their point . They compare landline only to dualframe landline and mobile and find that the percentage of current smokers has returned to 2010 levels . They completely ignore the landline only data for 2013 , which has an almost identical sample to 2010 . If you compare apples with apples the 2013 data actually shows that 12 % of the sample are current smokers , which is down from the 16 % in 2010 . It even appears that the number of current smokers has decreased from 20122013 based on raw numbers , rather than the weighted data . My guess as to the reason why the numbers show an increase when they include mobiles ? If you were a teenage smoker and they phoned your home phone , would you be completely honest within earshot of your parents ? Would you be more likely to answer honestly if you were not within earshot of your parents because they called on your mobile ? Literally every other statistic in their report shows a decline , that is what the authors of the report concluded . Cherry picking the one statistic with a different sample likely to allow the authors of the report to continue their research with a more suitable sample in the future is completely dishonest .