So what if Eric Schmidt got pissed at someone writing BS about him , and changed the Google algorithm of to favor his preferred candidate ? Or someone editing in flattering shit about them on Wikipedia ? This is serious shit , not excusable by ' having a long week '.<| sep |> The reason why was debated and explained many times already , so I ' ll just copypaste the latest argument here Now , as for the LAV 25 being used as a dedicated transport ? It wasn ' t 1983 , then it was 198889 then from some date and up to now , it wasn ' t again . The LAV 25 is designated as a troop transport in the acquisition document and earlier manual , for it was to be a joint order for both Army and USMC , and it was the former which wished to use it as an IFV for the Light Infantry Division concept which was designated as the contracting agency for both Army USMC . But the Army stepped out . In 1988 , the Light Armored Battalions ' main purpose was still to conduct reconnaissance The Corps seems to have had much troubles finding a proper use for it , for it was reroled or its roles expended every 4 or 5 years transport , recon , security , FSV , . Besides , having one battalion of LAV to transport three battalions of Marines performing their other tasks recon in 1983 , FSV from 1988 apparently doesn ' t really mark it as a real organic transport , but more as a more situational one . Since an MEU ' s heavy amphibians company and transport air wing can ' t do anything else but transport , we ' ve attached them to Marines as such . Thus freeing the LAV to perform their other , and original , task . So , instead of having the LAV duplicated in every single category , we ' ve considered it along the same rules as its more stable cousins Grizzly , Coyote , ASLAV 25 , . That is recon FSV .