Why can ' t I pick random for my preferred online stage even after five patches D <| sep |> Live at Winterland 101168 is my alltime favorite . I love the version of Fire , Tax free , and Bob Dylans ' Like a Rolling Stone . If you haven ' t heard it , you ' re in for a treat ! <| sep |> Suarez is such a classy guy <| sep |> I love that part of the Aztec calendar , in fact it was the first thing I cut when I made my CNC machine . If ya have room on the waiting list for one more , I ' d love to fill that spot ! <| sep |> Even if you were to actually have the balls to call people niggers and faggots in real life , what is it that you seek to accomplish by doing it or daydreaming about it ? Even if you actually manage to make it a felony to call people names in real life , what is it you seek to accomplish by doing it or daydreaming about it ? People can still think bad or hateful thoughts . No matter what consequences you put on them , actual bigots will be plenty hateful . They don ' t need a specific set of words to do it . And who decides what meets the threshold for banned speech ? And before you say it ' s common sense or obvious realize that a system governed that way is mob rule . If you ' re dumb enough to conflate using words like nigger or faggot with actually hating someone , or discriminating against someone , then here ' s a newsflash there ' s a thing called context , and when conversations are stripped of it , you could make anything , even the most innocent comment , sound terrible . So , to answer your initial question the guy you ' re replying to didn ' t say he wanted to use those words , but it is implicit from the context , but I still think you ' re putting words in his mouth . The goal is freedom of expression to let people express any thought or feeling , no matter how much you personally disagree with it . I really shouldn ' t have to remind you that opinions like we should desegregate the schools , or perhaps marriage should be open to any two people , not just a man and a woman both started as minority opinions . Before them , perhaps someone should be allowed to remarry following a divorce , or perhaps women should be allowed to vote were improper opinions to have . The equivalent of what you ' re proposing , the political correctness of that day , would have insisted that airing these views , at least publicly , was something to be ashamed of , and that anyone doing so should be socially punished by isolation and exclusion . They felt just as strongly about their particular beliefs as you do now about yours . But but but it ' s different when I do it ! , you say . No , it ' s really not . They are functionally identical . And you soothe yourself by saying you have good intentions , and your politics are progressive , while all those opinions are things that we ended up tossing out . well , yes , that ' s the point . They ' re all opinions I ' m sure you ' ll disagree with , but that at were point not allowed . Barring an opinion from being publicly acceptable to say doesn ' t make it go away if anything , it can just make it grow stronger out of resentment .