Here ' s the problem with ideas like this that come from people like Alan Greenspan . they are never a two way street . If Alan Greenspan was in favor of job insecurity all the way to the top that ' d be one thing , but clearly this is meant for the working class where job insecurity really means living insecurity as the people at the top can easily make it an indeterminate period of time without a job so naturally they would push for higher wages regardless of their job security as they can afford to be without one . This would not bother me if these same asshats did not cry foul play every time the masses tried to suggest any method to combat the hording of wealth and resources . Apparently it ' s perfectly acceptable to threaten people with starvation and death through job insecurity but the idea of limiting the number of mansions or yachts a person could own is tantamount to proposing the enslavement of the wealthy elite .