i ' ve done this before , when the wii first came out and was sold out for months straight . looking back yeah it ' s not like i ' m hanging up photos of that night but i don ' t regret it . i don ' t think my reason was any better than any of theirs . let people do their own things <| sep |> you have some adds with your kara fade , i have a bta looking mw howl with . 078 fv ? <| sep |> what was said ? <| sep |> Just hit mine with $ 200 <| sep |> This argument is well written , but there seems to be a logical leap involved . The argument starts with the constraint that if there were no quizzes given before the last lesson , it would be impossible to hold a surprise quiz then as the quiz would be expected to happen . While this is correct , it would not be correct to extend the argument that the lesson before on 6 December cannot have a surprise quiz given the initial proposition that a surprise quiz on 8 December has been ruled out , simply because the constraints that were originally placed for this proposition ie . that there were no quizzes prior to 8 December might not necessarily hold true in this case , since 6 December has not yet passed . In such a manner , it would therefore be incorrect to extend the argument further to 1 December , 24 November or 29 November as well . That , or I may have missed something in the previous argument