No idea yet . Took a couple shifts , but hasn ' t been back since the early 2 nd . <| sep |> How dare you pick my main . Instant lock in Irelia and rekt Ahri <| sep |> I want to check out HJ GLC since I ' ve been loving GreenLanterns , but I heard it was super hard to understand unless you read the New 52 series ? <| sep |> Had it for 2 years . Bought it for around $ 80 . So so worth for $ 50 <| sep |> I agree with you when you say that China is doing badly in general . But fairness would dictate that China , with 18 . 6 % of the world ' s population , should be consuming about 18 . 6 % of global resources and producing about 18 . 6 % of pollution , with the false assumption that all nations are equally developed . However , since in reality there are plenty of more developed postindustrial countries with the technological potential to utilise cleaner technologies and reduce or outsource manufacturing , and plenty of very poor or nonindustrial nations with very low emissions , a newlyindustrialised China will naturally account for a greater proportion of emissions , compounded by the fact that they produce goods for these other nations . Per capita emissions are an important measure , as is stage of development . Countries are pieces of land with invisible borders , and aggregate measures of emission are thus somewhat arbitrary population dynamics are more important . As China develops , you would expect reductions in emission as a result of technological advancement , and they seem to be committed to this at least on the face of it . I would argue that the US is far more worthy of blame , being a country that consumes far more than is reasonable per capita , and with unusually high emissions per capita for a country that could go fully renewable if it really wanted to .