It is 63 x and 37 x now . Wtf . <| sep |> There are better quality TN panels out there that do the same thing . This is one of the oldest 144 hz displays out there . You ' re better off with one of the newer ones . <| sep |> Pretty sure it ' s been mentioned that Elbaf is broken into clans , so I doubt they have a king <| sep |> Is this a mod ? I want this . <| sep |> You forgot to say I ' m a CTR shill too ! <| sep |> IMHO the avoids wasted votes for AV should be changed to the same as FPTP the difference between the two is only about 5 %. For negative campaigning and false majorities , AV actually seems a bit worse than FPTP thanks to the twobloc system it reinforces . Really I think for everything except strategic voting and the ballot , it ' s hard to justify any differences between FPTP and AV . Only ~ 23 % of seats changes hands compared to FPTP . There ' s not much daylight between the two . STV is also miscategorized here as semiproportional . It ' s not . It ' s a fully proportional system . What isn ' t technically fully proportional is the version of MMP talked about in this country , which is technically called AMS and technically only semiproportional . How relevant that distinction is depends a lot on the details of the system . In practice though Scotland and and previously Germany even under true MMP have been more vulnerable to false majorities than Ireland ' s STV . Obviously it ' s not 100 % possible to prevent these , but your chart should reflect the relative incidence of both . AVMMP is likely a little bit more vulnerable to false majorities too but how significant that distinction is is somewhat debatable . Again , we ' re talking 23 % of seats , and this is on the local side only . In terms of fairness to supporters of small parties , in practice STV has been easier for small parties to take seats in than MMP . I ' d suggest setting both of those to equal at around 2 , with STVMMP being the system with maximum fairness there . Again , AVMMP and FPTPMMP should probably be the same in terms of negative campaigning , but the need for coalition building does reduce negative campaigning compared to just FPTP or AV . Maybe set that to a 2 on the party side for both ? And 0 for the candidate side ? Also I have a hard time seeing how one could consider STVMMP easier to understand than just STV lol . I really like the concept and the presentation here a lot though . Fair Voting BC is doing something similar right now and I hope you don ' t mind if I pass this along .