I ' m in the 7 k range for career not much snd that I play <| sep |> You lowered yourself to scat ' s level writing this comment , oh the irony . <| sep |> Yeah but that isn ' t what this bill is about . That would talk large amounts of funding and years of work to implement . Actually now that I think k about it , after this gets regency , when do the actual methods get implemented ? <| sep |> hey thanks man ! <| sep |> have , she wouldn ' t have <| sep |> Thanks I will . <| sep |> Wait Idgi . What ' s happening ? Just read all the comments , and I ' m still not following what anyone ' s saying ? I ' m like ultra dumb ? <| sep |> This is a different argument . however Ari lax wrote an interesting premium scg article on archetype matchups . According to that the Archetype Toolbox that has good matchups against the current meta but a worse one versus control is horrendously underplayed . I agree that i would enjoy to see an even distribution of strategies , but the control archetype itself is flawed as a marginal better deck would mean everyone to switch to that deck since you cannot argue with the quality of answers , while you can argue with angle of attack in linear strategies . This makes it unlikely to have more than 1 viable control deck , while having 10 viable linear decks . So actually , focusing on having differnt viable decks is not necessarily a bad thing , as this will bring the most diversity in mechanics you have to face .