Now , I am a Canadian of English descent and I ' ve been paying attention to this whole thing from arms length . I understand Farage led the push for Brexit , whoch was the English exit from the EU . if this is correct then Farage has said that he would welcome a role in the Trump administration and floated the idea of being Trump ' s ambassador to the European Union . Can someone help make sense of that bit ? <| sep |> But how can you dictate the opinions allowed to be in discourse and how they should be treated when discourse by its very nature requires opposing opinions ? The scientific method exists to challenge the fuck out of facts . You answered your own question buddy . The news shouldn ' t report opposing views on issues which aren ' t scientifically contentious . There is no uncertainty in the minds of scientists that humans are causing climate change or that the Earth is billions of years old . We don ' t need the media to act as a secondary fact checker for scientific issues because frankly the media largely does not understand the scientific method and presents arguments from an emotional perspective rather than an empirical one . Simply put , the debate has been had and is already settled amongst the professional scientific community . The only reason the media picks up on these issues is to manufacture controversy and to generate clickbait and viewership .