You can sell here . <| sep |> I can honestly say I beat this game twice . But only twice . <| sep |> student email doesnt work for meeditworks <| sep |> But that ' s just as silly , since the central conceit of your argument remains basically counterfactual . If it weren ' t for the ways in which the current scenario is different from the past , the scenario wouldn ' t be that different from the past , sure . Also , if we were limbless gastropods with a complex network of internal bladders and no appendages , an intricate floorbased pressure plate would be a better control system than a keyboard and mouse . Less flippantly , the hypothetical condition of your argument is substantively different from the actual , present conditions , which is the point people keep trying to raise by bringing up the differences and explaining why they are substantive . Noone ' s ever really been disputing that some people having better gear than others has always been a part of the game . Rather , they ' ve been arguing that the degree to and mechanism by which that occurs under the current legendary system represents a significant and pejorative difference from the degree to and mechanism by which that occurred in the past . Saying that , differences aside , gear inequality has always existed is basically a nonsequiter in response to complaints specifically about those differences rather than about gear inequality in general .