It was actually a gradual change . <| sep |> What , a Trump supporters that calls bullshit when he sees it ? You ' re right on that . <| sep |> each combine give 50 % bonus . <| sep |> I need that photo . <| sep |> They prefer the babies . Less work , less chance of injury , better ratio of energy lossgain . <| sep |> I have quick mega if you ' re still interested . I ' m wanting to get SSGSSV . <| sep |> ahhhh . Key West . A playground for adults , and only a small number of newbies dumb enough to bring the kids <| sep |> Personal opinion alert I ' m a fellow Esperantoskeptic , and my main reason for being so is that the language itself sounds unattractive to me . Take the sentence la birdoj estas en la domo the birds are in the house . There is something personally unappealing about almost every word in this sentence . Using the word la to describe a plural noun of indeterminate gender rubs me the wrong way . Every Romance language that uses la uses it for feminine , singular nouns . Additionally , why include a word for the and not for aan , when neither are actually necessary ? I believe only Bulgarian and Macedonian do that . The word birdo is a word that ' s exclusive to English etymologically . So much for internationalism . The hypothetical fuglo would at least bring in the other Germanic languages or uelo would tie to Romance cognates . Birdoj just sounds quite harsh on my ears , and quite unlike the English , which sounds more like bd In principle , estas is a perfectly valid word for to be , and so is en for in . I wish Esperanto would have made up its mind systematically about which loanwords to adopt from which languages and not have done so seemingly at random . Domo , derived from the word most Slavs use for house , is one example . Why not hauso , kaso or mejzano ? The world may never know .