I just want to watch them all go off . Had to settle for thisjEUXTV 2 ZQ <| sep |> That is fuckin outstanding ! <| sep |> don ' t know what mhc is <| sep |> physical or visual proofProof has a specific meaning in the context of science . One of my professors used to say Proof is only for mathematics and whisky . the big bang theory is just a belief based off some probable evidence pointing to it . If there is evidence and it is probable then putting just a in front of belief is hardly justified . Everything we know is just beliefs off some probable evidence . Very , very few things are known with axiomatic certainty . Science is always subject to revision based on new observations or new theories with predictive power . Newtonian physics makes good predictions describing the orbits of planets . Quantum physics makes even more precise predictions describing the orbits of planets . The Newtonian understanding wasn ' t wrong , just incomplete . In order to be considered ' scientific ' an hypothesis must be falsifiable and it must make specific predictions . That means we need to have an experiment in mind that could conclusively demonstrate the hypothesis is wrong . Some of Einstein ' s startling predictions couldn ' t be tested until decades later but he proposed the necessary experiments capable of proving himself wrong . The same is true for the Big Bang and so far , the experimental measurements , such as cosmic background radiation , have exactly matched the calculated predictions made by the hypothesis . This is an absolute requirement of science . For example , there is an active debate among some physicists that some aspects of string theory may not qualify as science because they don ' t make sufficiently testable predictions . Without testable predictions , all you have is speculation or conjecture . This isn ' t necessarily useless because such speculation and conjecture can lead to a testable hypothesis . The basics around our understanding of the Big Bang have been demonstrated and independently replicated with objectively measurable experiments . There are many details about the exact mechanisms at work or which path it took , especially subPlankian , that we only have untested hypotheses for and there are others which may remain conjecture . However , that doesn ' t mean the basics aren ' t very well validated .