I have read it , and note that your quotes , 1 does not provide any indication of a causal link to porn , 2 reports concerns that are not quantified and represents beliefs that has not been validated , which is why neither of the first two points have led to any strong wording in the findings . 3 has been linked to the review presents no evidence that this is a strong effect , nor that it is lasting , nor that it is causal . The extent to which these effects consitutes harm is also subjective I note that you have demonstrated that nicely by your choice in which things you have highlighted , and which you have not . The language is also strongly subjective . E . g . unrealistic attitudes needs to be quantified personally I certainly engage in a lot of sex that a lot of people would consider unrealistic to expect . Including , incidentally male domination which they consider less progressive gender role attitudes but which when talking purely about sex does not generally have much to do with more general gender roles . It is also simply reality that while both men and women taken on both roles , there is a very clear difference in frequency based on gender there . My experience is that porn often enable people to talk about things they thought nobody else fantasised about . As such , while it is possible that this reflects a change in attitudes , their literature survey has not uncovered any evidence that this difference in attitude reflects an actual change in sexual proclivities vs . revealed existing tendencies that the people in question were unaware of prior to finding porn . In either case , this does not constitute evidence of harm without a evidence that these attitudes are actually harmful , b evidence that these attitudes being expressed means that they were caused by porn rather than that the people involved simply because able to put words to feelings they did not previously understand . E . g . historically we ' ve seen the sam with homosexuality there ' s no indication that increased exposure to gay material has made anyone gay , but it ' s certainly a major factor in allowing people to understand and express their sexuality . In the category of things the report is less certain aboutA lot more has been linked to , again without being able to say anything about any causal relationships . Given that the above series of conjectures is the strongest they managed to justify , yes , I stand by my interpretation of it as not providing evidence of harm .