Yes , and those people who are doing it are BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW . <| sep |> Thank you so much haha ! This is going to help a ton ! <| sep |> I mean usually is definitely an incorrect ass pulled figure but I definitely see some of the same characteristics of those claiming feminist identify except that they are different forums where they don ' t get marginalised such as on tumblr etc . The difference is the starting point really . Feminisms starting identity is women ' s rights . Egalitarianism ' s starting identity is equality . Both aren ' t necessarily inclusive of the gender politics of changing or fluid sex and many counter examples can be found on both identities . When you start with Feminism you can get people who believe that Only true feminist can women and weigh people ' s ideas based on gender and other such problems . Egalitarianism closes that issue off atleast but the driving ideology behind making people equal will vary in different subcultures such as equality by opportunity or equality by artificial methods such as quota . But whatever subculture of egalitarianism exist the identity breaking goal would be to have exceptions to rules . For example toilet segregation might be due to gender identity or Genotype . or no segregation . In the Genotype scenario you could argue that solution as impractical or stupid due to Genotype ' s exceeding the standard two sex model and they ' d have to take measure of your view because to not take weight of someone ' s view in any equality algorithm would break the identity of egalitarianism . Where as that isn ' t strictly a requirement for many definitions of Feminism , where you can have good old fashion echo chambers and ideas value weighted on gender . in somemany circles