Yup ! I agree 100 % that it ' s a great idea . In the arcade . Make the two clear game modes different , not identical with the difference being multiple rounds and points . People who like noncompetitive modes are not second class players . Don ' t put the practice mode for competitive players over the main mode of casual players . That ' s all I ' m saying . <| sep |> I ' ve no doubt you ' re right about the widespread vapidity I work in the arts and have seen plenty of them myself , but that doesn ' t mean that they can just be dismissed altogether or labeled the way you originally did . They ' re still people and they ' ve still achieved a lot and inspired many . I ' m not saying they ' re equally deserving as her , but they ' re not entirely undeserving either . I just don ' t see any need to be nasty about them , rather than just celebrating her accomplishments and letting them be if you disagree about their awards . And re within their respective professions that ' s true of her too , no ? In all three cases they ' re people with an incredible natural aptitude for something , who then worked hard for decades to make something special of their talents . Getting people to the moon may be well , is objectively more difficult and impressive than acting or basketball , but nonetheless it ' s just getting to the top of the field in which one ' s talents lay . I mean , let ' s say there ' s something even harder than getting people to the moon , and someone achieved it . Does that mean that Hamilton ' s achievement is immediately eclipsed and reduced to nothing ? Of course not . I ' m not even especially supporting De Niro or Jordan here , just saying that they don ' t deserve invective simply for not measuring up in your view to one of the other recipients . I very much doubt that Hamilton was thinking that about them either .