Basscenter melted my dick off <| sep |> Does the CP of the ditto matter since they copy their opponent ? <| sep |> I feel like you betray your agenda quite clearly when you equate a card game company removing cards that were offensive to women oh and notice the quotation marks to cancer . <| sep |> Sounds like a job for uspez <| sep |> The other two you pointed to look interesting , also but I suspect any method that is too technical for people to easily understand is never going to be trusted for our electoral system . PAV is counted using a method that is essentially a subset of the STV counting method EDIT should clarify deterministic STV only , which is generally what is proposed , because nondeterministic methods are subject to Woodall freeriding . My mistake . I meant Ranked Pairs uses a Rating ballot not Range which , as you say , could be counted using Condorcet or Range methods . I do liked Ratings more than Rankings , for which Approval is just a binary Rating ballot . Still in Great Old Ones territory here . AFAIK the only RankedPairs esque ballot that is summable by rating score is the more normal term here , I think is Borda Count , a system long discredited . Ranked Pairs is something else . Additinally , no Condorcet method is ON summable , which means that there does not exist any Condorcet method that can be counted using a range method . EDIT 2 Ranked Pairs most certainly does not use a ratings balot