It ' s possible but unlikely . <| sep |> She just got scared by news reports <| sep |> Aaaaand my point is made . <| sep |> 6040 % isn ' t too bad ! I can work with that . Thanks for the info ! ! D <| sep |> Cause an Aggie meltdown don ' t stop <| sep |> Life is cruel <| sep |> The twist at the end was pretty good . <| sep |> I thought the circlejerk was against hanzo and junkrat . Also doesn ' t the ' surprising amount of damage ' come from one of the ingame tips ? <| sep |> That ' s fine ! Ill pass on the Dratini , thanks for trying anyway D <| sep |> I just wonder what field that person is in and I am worried about their perceived expertise . I mean , not only did that conservation of energy jump out at me , but the conclusion that it has 10 times the energy of . 38 acp , and that the guy must have been able to sit up because . it was an elastic collision ? In addition to that there is a mistake in the moment of inertia calculation forgets that its length SQUARED when calculating , if I recall correctly . Then once the erroneous calculation is almost completed to determine the velocity , the entire mass is said to be at that velocity . Still no admission of error , either of the computation or theoretical nature . I don ' t know if anyone should trust this person ' s advice on ANY subject matter .