If you know someone that has fallen for MLM , or is about to , show them thisMultilevel Marketing Last Week Tonight with John Olivers 6 MwGeOm 8 iI <| sep |> I always want to steal those big Christmas decorations . <| sep |> No . This is such a fucking stupid rebuttal . If X accuses Y of a crime , and it cannot be proven that Y committed the crime , then Y is found innocent . This does not mean that X is automatically guilty of false accusation . Nobody is suggesting that is how it should work . What would now happen is that X is investigated to see if they are guilty of false accusation . If evidence can be found to support it , then they are guilty . If X accused Y of a crime in good faith , i . e . not deliberately making a false accusation but merely wrong or right , but with insufficient evidence to prove it then there cannot possibly be any evidence of X deliberately making a false accusation . If X deliberately falsely accused Y , but there was not enough evidence to prove it , they would still get away with the false accusation . If X deliberately falsely accused Y , and there was sufficient evidence to prove it , then and only then would they be guilty of false accusation . There is absolutely no reason for this to dissuade genuine victims from reporting crimes , because evidence of that accusation being false simply cannot exist .