He went pretty far though . <| sep |> Exactly the same . but different <| sep |> Russian hackers broke into the DNC per all of the cybersecurity firms as well as US intelligence agencies How can you possibly say the link is speculative ? It IS speculative . Did all evidence found by these agencies and firms point to the Russians ? Hell yeah ! To what degree ? Quite a lot , actually ! So . if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck , how is it not a duck ? If you know a thing or two about cyber security , you know how easy it is to stay anonymous and how difficult it is to track down most attacks . And that ' s exactly the problem here . These were highly sophisticated spearphishing attacks , carried out by individualsgroups who really know their shit . And yet , lots of documents had Russiarelated metadata , while various logs are showing the attacks coming from Russian IP addresses . How the fuck does a sophisticated attacker leave such egregious amounts of evidence behind ? By design , that ' s how . I find it hard to believe that this wasn ' t all intentional . It ' s just way too obvious . Does this prove it WASN ' T the Russians ? It doesn ' t . Is this speculation , too ? Of course it is . But at least you have to be skeptical about those equally speculative claims . I cringe whenever I hear all these experts with we found definitive evidence it was the Russians . You don ' t say ? Combine that with a long h i s t o r y t a c t i c o f a c c u s i n g a d v e r s a r i e s o f k r e m l i n t i e s a n d r u s s i a s y m pathieshaslonghistoryinus of Democrats I ' m one blaming the Russians , and you get quite a different picture from what the MSM is painting .