That ' s your response ! ?!? Wow . You just fall into the stereotype that liberals are completely deflective in the face of a real argument . <| sep |> That ' s crossing the line bro . <| sep |> Denmark . The Liberals won and the Socialists spent ten years in opposition . One candidate used the words not housebroken about the party that stole his votes . <| sep |># N U T # U # T <| sep |> Lets do this <| sep |> This is of dubious legality , though research on a Rubber Ducky might provide you with some direction . <| sep |> Put a little effort into trolling next time . <| sep |> I can ' t wait to fucking crush these dudes . <| sep |> Unfortunately there ' s no end all be all method . You have to pick a method that ' s appropriate for the area , the species involved , and the budget . Some methods are cost intensive , or degrade the soil too much , and it depends on why you ' re doing the cut disease control , profit , thinning a few decades prior to harvest . Who ' s paying for the work also matters a lot . The impacts are mostly bad . About all that can be done is mitigation , like improving leave tree selection , or not cutting a stand if it ' s critical habitat for a species that ' s likely to be listed under the ESA in few years . This is where biologists come in . Their job is basically combat triage . Do the most amount of good and make the best policies under the circumstances by attaching a dollar value to a certain activity or convincing people that it doesn ' t cost them anything to do x over y . It ' s all bad , but you can maybe help make the recovery higher quality going forward and conserve some critical stuff . Laws usually require leave trees of some kind and replanting .