TIL there is a superior species of ice cream . <| sep |> yeah good thing we voted in a billionaire convicted of fraud who wont sever his business connections who is already using his position to grow his business . He loves his country so much more than money . <| sep |> There ' s just no escaping cheaters . <| sep |> Thanks ! I think I ' ll pick these up . ~~ I saw those after I posted . Is Gateron a brand or . ?~~ EDIT I figured it out . Yeah it is . I googled it and I found comparisons between Gateron and Cherry MX switches so it made me think it was a different switch type . <| sep |> You apparently don ' t know what recency bias means . You can have watched all of them and still suffer recency bias Becaus Smith is the moat recent and freshest in your mind . Sorry friend . I don ' t care who you think deserves to get in . I ' m talking about what it actually takes to get in , and your opinion of a player is irrelevant . Did Loville or Wilson retire top 5 all time in career stats ? You forgot that part friend . The criteria they look at are by the book . The level of that criteria needed changes as time goes on and may vary slightly , but they ' re all looking at the same basic things . And statistics never tell the entire story of a player . It can ' t provide context for a lot of aspects of the game . But that ' s what they go by . Because they ' re objective . They don ' t provide all the context , but they don ' t lie either . And bad players don ' t accumulate the kind of stats to be in the conversation . You say Marvin Harrison getting in is subjective right after you claim that the HOF voting process is a by the bookset in stone deal by looking at statistics . I never said set in stone . Sorry friend , you don ' t get to put words in my mouth . And I said the criteria they look at is by the book , not the exact numbers they need by those criteria . And I acknowledged that off field personality is the exception . What they look at is largely objective . What a player needs to have accomplished by that objective criteria is subjective . For example . They are all looking at career stats . But is top 15 in yards enough ? 12 ? 10 ? The stat is objective , the line for that stat is subjective . And yes , they hold personality and personal grudges against players in voting . If you weren ' t a liked player , the committee will hold it against you . Again , I ' m not telling you how it should work , I ' m telling you how it does work . Friend .