pewterHah ! As if they ' d spring for something as expensive as pewter . You ' ll take your plastic and be thankful for it ! <| sep |> Standard league . Pick 3 fromBell , Gore , Jstew , Booker , Blount and Rawls Currently running Bell , Rawls and GoreThanks ! <| sep |> Well , no , because the people who don ' t like his politics say as such . And that is fair enough . It is the people who have been told what to think that are the problem . or those who buy into the bullshit stories . The whole Corbyn thing is no different from the EU referendum . Some people have legitimate issues and I can engage with that , but it is getting to the point that those who have been told what to say , parrot it , then when questioned much deeper , they don ' t really have the evidence to back up their claim , and get insulted if you say its ignorance which it is . You also wouldn ' t look at Corbyn and hold him to a higher degree of accountability than any other MP , which is clearly happening . When you put much of what is being offered by Labour into policy with no political attachment , most people are for it , it is after all just relatively sensible and aimed towards the majority of your normal average person . As a prime example of the unthinking hate of Corbyn , which I ' ve mentioned previously , was watching a BBC piece , in which there was a section interviewing the public about Corbyn ' sLabour ' s policy . One bloke was saying how he was pro Corbyn , who was quickly interrupted by a woman claiming unelectable . When questioned further , she couldn ' t explain why . The next 4 people I think it was all said similar , and not one of them could expand on their reasoning for this . Most of them all agreed he was a decent bloke and seemed more reasonable than most MPs . except one , who thought he was satan personified , again unable to give reasoning why . What is apparently from this , and in any conversation in which someone gives an opinion , but then doesn ' t have a reason why , starkly points at it being a mantra of no substance , put in peoples heads by consistently repeating something , but not having the evidence to back it up . Quite like Take back control except they did have evidence on that , it was just a blatant lie that was easily disproven . So if people don ' t like his politics , they can say so , and it would be a relatively short conversation because arguing with ideological differences is almost impossible unless that person is completely willing to open up to you . But they tend not to .