I suggest you look up and read the numerous counter arguments to these claims . Why would I continue to do this ? I would just be wasting my time . I have already researched the theoriesarguments and there is no concrete evidence against intelligence design , only unfounded opinions and rigged studies . There is only falsehood in and falsehood out . As for vast amounts of order , why would the same intelligent designer create such vast amounts of chaos to ? Chaos is not created by God , it is created by those who refuse to obey the proper way to exist , as outlined by God . You also have to point to the 99 % of all life that is extinct , that incredibly inefficient process as also intelligent . Actually , this is quite shortsighted . There would be no life on this planet today , if the animal and plant populations were not controlled in some form . We can see the evidence for this today ! The world ' s human population is surely struggling to feedprovide clean water for all its inhabitants and humans have only been around for about six thousand years . So , in many past cases extinction was necessary . The evolutionists call this survival of the fittest . I call it extinction by cause and effect . Again , not a clue . I am not surprised that you don ' t understand the analogy that I have supplied per your request , most wouldn ' t . Yet , this doesn ' t negate the connection it has to death and a resurrection . The problem arises because the antiGod refuse to leave the box that they have put themselves into ! But , there is other evidence for a resurrection of the dead , both biblical and nonbiblical , which you will need to research for yourself . The fact that you edited my quote and took it out of context surely stands among the top ten most ridiculous attempts at rational and honest debating . This statement is not fact , but a misdirection ! What I did was take a sentence out of several and comment on it . This is exactly what you have done to my claims . When you make a statement and then later contradict that statement , the remaining words are just gibberish . Thus , they can ' t be taken out of context , because there isn ' t a clear context implied . Also , in the future , maybe you could come up with some original thoughts and not use the ones from your opponent .