No problem , thanks for the trade ! !<| sep |> There ' s a camping mod that allows you to craft grenades that spawn sleeping bags , allowing you to save anywhere . <| sep |> Jesus my husband isn ' t even this well behaved at the doctor ' s office . <| sep |> Super clean feed . Thanks ! !<| sep |> I am a person who is honest <| sep |> Brilliant ! I ' m getting really excited , here . It seems Canada is a very viable option ! At first we weren ' t so sure , and that ' s why we opened up our search to other countries . I ' m very happy with the thought of Canada . Thanks for your input , friend ! <| sep |> Bellize is not part of Open World or Global Roaming <| sep |> Return it and buy another one . Easiest and fastest way to get it fixed . <| sep |> I ' m just cynical because I need to double check and triple check and quadruple check most info these days because nothing is very transparent . It ' s super annoying , but I ' d rather be sure of what I ' m sharing than share false info or not be able to back up my claims . That ' s not annoying . Cynism is a good thing . I understand you didn ' t suggest it ' s fake , don ' t worry . Having reliable sources is paramount . I just warned about the common , famous fallacy of , in arguments , asking for immediate , irrefutable evidence of every claim you ' ve made , and when you don ' tcan ' t , it ' s ' Aha ! It ' s false , then '. I ' m not suggesting you ' ve done that , of course . But since you seem willing to debate Trump supporters , you ' ll see that a lot . It goes somewhat like thisYou make statements A , B and CThe other person asks for sources , now . Spoon feed me . You say , well , it ' s readily available on google . Here ' s a link that explains part of it . So , you only have one source ? !? It ' s your job to provide evidence for claims ! It must be false , then ! If it ' s a really pretentious teenager on youtube , heshe ' ll cite Hitchens ' razorlaw that which is stated without evidence can be rejected without evidence , which is , obviously , a misunderstanding of Hitchens ' ideas and , really , a sacrilege . The problem with this fallacy is twofold 1 , if a claim is unsourced , it doesn ' t mean it ' s false . It just means it ' s not source and , at most , cannot be verified true . 2 , it often goes that the person you ' re debating is , unwittingly , forcing you to spoon feed them evidence . Sometimes evidence is not readily available , or dificult to find , sometimes you have better things to do . Nevertheless , the lack of immediate , irrefutable evidence says nothing of the argument besides that it is , so far , unsourced . If I claim I have a car , at home , and I fail to provide evidence for it , it doesn ' t mean that I DON ' T have a car . I may or may not have a car . For example , can you show me the evidence for the evolution of the whale from a land animal to a sea animal ? Well , yes , there are tonnes of evidence . But , can you show it to me , right now ? Well , no , I can ' t . So , there ' s no evidence then , my theory is as good as yours ! when often , said theory is unsourced and lacks evidence . Cheers .