Too bad for that guy he didn ' t take the bet , eh ? I can admit I was wrong . I had no idea how many people were willing to overlook misogyny and racism . <| sep |> this is the original post Idk how they did it haha i wouldnt have the patience for it <| sep |> Dang nice . I ' ve seen this guy with cert orange lights and he couldnt get a parralax <| sep |> I stopped for my now EX gf . But I like the sober life <| sep |> It ' s really cool that with today ' s technology we can slowly watch a man descend into madness in his creepy serial killer basement online from the comfort of our homes <| sep |> Twin might be resilient but they ' re only resilient insofar as they can reassemble the combo quite well . What you ' re neglecting is that any deck that doesn ' t have the inevitability of BGx or URx or what have you should be able to kill Twin with the extra time the disruption gave them . What I ' m trying to say is that you have two types of good hands against Twin hands with interaction to stop the t 4 kill and hands that are faster than t 4 . Most draws that can ' t do one of those things are probably a mulligan in the dark . What this means is that you ' re demanding a very particular type of draw from Twin which they definitely don ' t have every time . So maybe you don ' t have the interaction to beat the combo g 1 , but you ' re on the play and outrace them . Maybe you have interaction and on the draw and stop their t 4 combo which gives you enough time to win . Maybe you have interaction and are on the play so either you stop their combo or outrace . The only really problematic situation is being on the draw and not having interaction , which even you have to admit is a fairly infrequent occurrence and also not really problematic .