i need a few more keys , 1 or 2 <| sep |> Hunters get seagulls from anywhere they want if they barrage <| sep |> It is quite possible . source . Live in a house with a window like that . <| sep |> At the end of the day grading is subjective . This guide should helpGradingCriteria . For trying to determine value after you ' ve placed a rough grade on it , check out SOLD auctions on ebay and compare those to your books . <| sep |> Because there is no spaghetti ? <| sep |> But the difference is , FNV did have a load of storyquestscharacters ? It had far more quests than both Fo 3 and 4 , in fact Yes , I am aware that it includes the FNV DLC . even removing the DLC it still has far more . Yeah , it ' s a shame that the Legion side of the map got cut . But I don ' t mind , because the game doesn ' t feel like it ' s missing out on huge amounts of story , because the game has loads of it anyway . And here ' s the thing yeah , I ' m looking at Fo 4 as what it could have been rather than what it is , because , as a Fallout fan , I play Fallout games for story and interesting quests and characters , not for settlement building or killing bullet spongey legendary enemies so I can get that legendary leather left leg . If I wanted that , I ' d play Minecraft or Borderlands because they both do that far better because they ' re at least focused on the idea . Yeah , maybe them not having settlement building in the game wouldn ' t have not automatically have resulted in more quests and such that I desire , but one would hope that that time and money would ' ve gone to something better instead . Fallout 4 definitely did not deliver what I look for in a Fallout game , with writing , story , etc . Considering that the general consensus on the story and a lot of the quests is that the writing is crap , I ' m honestly not surprised it didn ' t really have any of that , because Fallout 3 and Skyrim ' s writing was terrible and boring anyway . But I ' d hope they ' d improve , because at least Morrowind was well written . I guess not . And honestly even disregarding my bias towards Fo 12 NV , I think as a game Fo 4 isn ' t very well designed anyway , as I said before it ' s very unfocused game . You ' ve got a halfbaked , pointless settlement building , then you have a halfbaked legendary system , and you also have a poor man ' s attempt at a dialogue system from Mass Effect that misses the point in how that system worked in the first place because first off at least Mass Effect ' s dialogue system allowed you to have more or less than 4 options , rather than restricting the designers to 4 are the damn time . . Then there ' s just poor writing and pacing in general . Not just for a Fallout game , but for a regular game , things like expecting you to care about characters who you have only known for 2 seconds that most players forget about soon after leaving the vault anyway yet your character cares , resulting in a huge amounts of ludonarrative dissonance , or pacing issues like giving you power armor and killing one of the most powerful creatures in the game , and then giving you the top job of a faction 20 bloody minutes into the game . I could go on forever about the game and its problems . But can you really fault people for comparing Fo 4 to the previous Fallout game ?