I ' ve heard this story on 99 % invisible . I think it ' s true . it ' s not the first time i ' ve come across it . <| sep |> You don ' t fancy a giggle m 8 ? <| sep |> It is not out yet . Check out this video Invasion Modpack Development ! 1 . 10 . 2 at 1899 Start at 130 is to see game play . <| sep |> Amazing ! Do we have listings for reputable placespeople that do extensions ? <| sep |> they better get it done before it becomes Tynamo <| sep |> Whens the next time you can so it again ? <| sep |> That will come down to the prosecution calling up expert witnesses to testify that it ' s highly unlikely to be true and much more probably that someone doing this would be doing it to damage evidence . You ' d need to also provide expert witnesses in disagreement of that . It would come down to which expert witnesses the judge thinks are correct . Which situation the judge agrees is more probable . In civil cases that hasn ' t worked , where the balance of probabilities only requires for one side to be 51 % more probable . Criminal cases have much higher requirements though , I don ' t think it has been tested . I wouldn ' t recommend being the person involved in testing it . No matter what happens your life will be ruined . You ' ll lose your career from people trying to disaccociate with you , and you ' ll have a hard time getting another job because anyone hiring you will come up with national news about your court case when they google your name . In the society of today you ' re fucked if you go to court for something like this , whether you ' ve done something wrong or not . It ' s life damaging due to the permanent online record of what occurred .