I ' d be hesitant to start screaming corruptionthe man apparently conspired to pervert the course of justiceyou know the chief officer of the rule of law ? the judge maker ? when Gleeson would not be corrupt , he misled the house not allegedly , for absolute sure it has been determined he did In order to mess with separation of powers and weaken the rule of law in this country . He was allegedly sooooo corrupt that he sought to prevent government service like the ATO having access to independent non corrupt legal advice in the future . He wanted to have requests go through him and only allow it when it was a case that it didnt matter to him if the lawyer was not dodgy . So not only was he allegedly corrupt , ,,, he seems to have sought to make the Australian rule of law corrupt into the future , by restricting access to honest legal advice to protect corruption AND to ensure ongoing corruption . I mean why would you hesitate ? What about you says oh a once off ? Its only billion dollars , nothing like as bad as a helicopter ride ? It is only the man in charge of all of law getting bit hissy cos did not get to pervert it . A billion dollar scam .