Probably looking at dank maymays of pepe ' s <| sep |> I think it ' s one of those things where if you ' re a Deadpool fan or a fan of that style of humor in general you ' ll love it , but if you don ' t , you won ' t . There ' s not a lot of room for inbetween . <| sep |> The zombie apocalypse scenario indeed isn ' t likely or something that Bitcoin can help with . And thus the argument in the first place isn ' t relevant . You ' re saying the same thing I ' m saying from a different perspective . Thanks . I ' m sure you don ' t have the same connection Today as 7 years ago . Most people had 1 MB 0 . 1 MB back then , now at least 10 MB 1 MB if not more . And the data caps increased too . Thus , if you could keep up with the blockchain 7 years ago , you can now too with a 10 x wider Bitcoin . Also , if you argue that we should not rely on datacenters for full nodes because they can be easily shut down with a court order , the same applies to your internet connection as well . A court can easily say , no bitcoin related traffic should be allowed by the ISP ' s and they would shut you down no matter where you run your full node . It ' s not like you are running your own private cable to the internet backbone are you ? Or , if you ' re , then you don ' t have bandwidth issues ! You can ' t have it both ways . I agree that Bitcoin shouldn ' t be a replacement to fiat , it can ' t be . But it should be a 10 x 100 x larger currency , so it has more full nodes , more miners , more users , and thus generally more stable and relevant in the world .