When i saw the name Ling Tan in a PSLE score article , for a moment i thought i was reading newnation . sg <| sep |> I literally didn ' t read any of this paragraph <| sep |> What ' s the big fuss over pandas ? <| sep |> I like to call it drinkable fruit salad <| sep |> Trump is just as much of a jingo as he was , but without the rugged adventurous personality . <| sep |> Too sensible , not an option . <| sep |> Grabs popcorn . The moment we ' ve all been waiting for . <| sep |> Automation is going to replace most if not all manual labor . <| sep |> Using Red Dragon to simply carry rovers is a complete waste of mass . You may be able to fit 1 Curiosity class rover in a Red Dragon . But that launch vehicle Falcon Heavy is quoted to be able to send 13 , 000 kg to Mars . Since the Curiosity plus its cruise stage have a launch mass under 4 , 000 kg you could in theory send a stack of 3 Curiosity class rovers on the same launch vehicle and save that overhead . SpiritOpportunity class rovers including cruise stage are just over 1 , 000 kg so you could pack a whole fleet onto a Falcon Heavy . There would be other issues like volume limits and a dispenser but still the general premise is the same , if your going to use a Falcon Heavy just send the existing systems . Red Dragon has a place , it would be the heaviest mass landed on Mars . Which would be an important stepping stone to getting a manned landing . However the payloads a Red Dragon should bring would be those that couldn ' t fit or wouldn ' t be suitable to the existing landing systems .