kuch toh din toh guzariye vadodara mein <| sep |> Is it too late for me too fake sensitivity ? <| sep |> Adding you bacK ! <| sep |> Someone would point out to the parliment members that theyed be banning amazon , and that would be the end of it <| sep |> His arm punting ability is still over 9000 though <| sep |> Congratulations my fellow Ranger . And may the power protect you ! <| sep |> IGN LucioDeposited Mareanie female lv 17 , named bully <| sep |> Like brown skinned beauties ? How about it the other 13 ! !<| sep |> Super alpha who is loud af <| sep |> its only $ 24 . 99 at best buy <| sep |> The forecasting sites predicting 90 % odds for Clinton were simply dead wrong . If I roll a dice and expect to roll a 1 through 5 , and claim my odds of victory are 83 . 33 %, but I end up rolling a 6 it doesn ' t necessarily mean my claim of my odds were wrong . Arguably it just means you ' d be wrong to assume the most likely outcome would necessarily happen . If the election was repeated multiple times , trump would win much more than 10 % of the time . If the election were repeated Trump would win 100 % of the time because the system is deterministic . Kinda like Bill Murry ' s groundhog day . But if we wipe everyone ' s memory between replications we would still calculate 10 % odds with the same model and polling data inputs . The problem isn ' t so much the odds predicted by models being wrong so much as it ' s the measurememt error of the polling data going into that models .