352 . And TES Skyrim . <| sep |> Stupid fat Gollumses <| sep |> For a college student who is primarily going to do heavy multitasking with multi web browsing , video streaming , word doc and some light gaming League of Legends which would be better ? Acer Asipre vs HP ay 195 nr Aspirei 37100 UWindowsE 557533 BMdpB 01 K 1 IO 3 QW 15 ay 195 nrLaptop 156 Screen <| sep |> In the big bash I see people in thongs . THONGS ! <| sep |> You can make discriminatory prejudgements based on collective aggregates . It ' s preferable behavior , it good , it ' s not bad . The need to make such presumptions is only necessary where and when direct observation can ' t be performed statistical indicators are only useful when the target variable can ' t be directly measured . In most social interactions , again , you are interacting with a specific individual , not with a random variable drawn from a population aggregate , so there ' s no value in applying categoryderived prejudices in lieu of actually directly evaluating the individuals you ' re dealing with . You act with a stranger based on prejudgements based on collectivist aggregate behavior of humans . If you ' re interacting with the stranger , then he has observable characteristics that override the need for making any assumptions . Further , in a hightrust society , we have mechanisms that indemnify us against the risks associating with extending trust to others in the absence of a priori evidence of trustworthiness , so we have the capacity to give strangers the benefit of the doubt irrespective of initial assumptions . It ' s only in a lowtrust society , where those indemnifications are minimal or nonexistent , that the risks may make it more valuable to withhold the benefit of the doubt and instead apply a much thicker set of criteria for establishing social relations confidently . I know that the ' altright ' prefers this sort of lowtrust society as a justification for offering its own thick set of values in place of trustnegotiation mechanics among individuals , but the reality is that this creates much more risk and conflict than would otherwise prevail collectivism just doesn ' t work as a method of producing stable societies as well as individualism does .