I understand why trans are included but I don ' t understand the Queer part . To me it ' s more a political artistic life style decision than a sexual matter . Some heterosexual even describe themselves as queer . I understand that LGBT at least all have to deal with sexualgender issues but I didn ' t think it was at the center of the queer definition . <| sep |> I ' m sure Julian could wear that and still make the fans wet <| sep |> It was my impression that vouchers only cover a certain percentage of the cost of private education . That is , say the total tuition in private school is 14 k , the parent pays 7 k and gets a 7 k voucher to help cover the cost . Also , you ' re ignoring the fact that the the public system isn ' t just losing the amount of the voucher , they are also losing the student . If the amount of the voucher is less than the cost of educating that student , then the public system is indeed better off not in terms of total funding , but indeed in terms of funding per student . edit I just want to add that I don ' t necessarily think that this should be the beall and endall of the discussion of whether vouchers are good or not . This is just an argument that was once presented to me as a reason vouchers can be good , and I ' ve never been able to successfully argue against it .