Har bara hrt talas om Ratatouille och baguetter frn den listan <| sep |> Use the old version of google hangouts with the phone still enabled . I use g . cohangouts <| sep |> But it doesn ' t say how exactly . <| sep |> MSI for less heatnoise , XFX GTR for overclocking i think . <| sep |> I take it Nigel Farage isn ' t counted as a world leader ? He was actually a campaign advisor to Trump . Pretty sure The Donald has spoken with him more than Putin . <| sep |> I generally upvote every comment on my own posts , to keep that validation going . <| sep |> IMO , this is a redherring issue about objectivesubjective terminology . Consider a model A in which Y ~ expX where X is assigned an exponential prior X ~ expon 1 in accordance with the subjective belief of the bayesian analyst . Consider model B created with objective bayesian approach which does not assign priors based on beliefs but simply requires that all parameters are sampled from uniform priors U 0 , 1 . Now assume that we model the relationship between X and Y as Y ~ 1 X . Perhaps this choice of the relationship is subjective but so is then the choice of sampling distribution in frequentist analysis Gelman ' s 2 nd point it ' s perhaps subjective , but not bayesian kind of subjective , because priors are not chosen according to any belief . So we have a subjective and objective model yet mathematically they are identical . Even worse for the distinction , for almost all subjective models that we usually bother to use , we can construct an objective model with uniform priors .