It be like that . <| sep |> Not in the least . The rules were laid out ages ago , and everyone knew the stakes going in . The popular vote never mattered . Its corrosive to the democratic process . When you start putting people in with minority support over the candidate with more support its a problem . Saying , nope its totes follows the rules doesn ' t mean the rules are good and it doesn ' t mean we had a good result . Results like this are absolutely corrosive to the democratic process , and it really does need to be fixed . <| sep |> I remember that ! <| sep |> I thought it was the enemy of my enemy was little brother <| sep |> You also need a vast amount of signalling upgrades unfortunately . <| sep |> Why is it immoral ? They just have impulses , choosing not to to act on them is actually moral . One does not have much choice over their impulses , its acting on it where it counts . I don ' t consider someone with paedophilic impulses to be immoral , I consider the act of child abuse to be immoral . If victimless paedophile porn i . e cartoons helps a paedophile not act on that impulse , that is a good thing . What is ethically acceptable is purely subjective and back to my original point , its really none of your business what people do behind closed doors , so long as it affects no one else . Besides we ' re not talking about paedophiles here , we ' re talking about consenting adults pissing on each other and women ejaculating which is perfectly natural believe me and absolutely victimless .