# NO STAMINA . LONG WORK WEEK ? IT ' S WEDNESDAY BEFORE THANKSGIVING . <| sep |> It is a laughably ridiculous assertion to claim that is the most consistent set of facts to explain their lying . Not at all . What is laughably ridiculous is your claim that the fact that all three of them were found to be liars , has little bearing on the likelihood of them having made an altogether false claim . it is far from rare for complainants to lie about subsequent contact with defendants because they think it will hurt their case . Really ? You have evidence showing that it is common for people to lie under oath in such a way ? To think that this indicates lying suggests you have a paper thin level of belief in the probability of the initial claim being true if any . That , if true , is wildly in contradiction to all the empirical data about the prevalence of false claims . But you ' re not looking at it properly . You can ' t be examining the Ghomeshi case claims in the context of all claims , seeing that a low percentage are false , and declaring it unlikely to be false . You have to be looking specifically at claims that had significant parts of the story proven to be false though not the whole thing . And you can be sure that of those claims , many are false .