If you can ' t avoid a woman in a wheelchair then you shouldn ' t be a police officer . Literally just stand behind them and grab onto it . Lean back . There , now they can ' t hit you . <| sep |> Thankfully working in federal law enforcement I fall under leosa and can carry pretty much anywhere with my duty carry concealed . If I have a personal firearm I have some limits but I can still conceal carry in every state <| sep |> Christ your angerdelusion is palpable . Well here we go then , what nebulous organisations ? You don ' t like them so whom are they ? You ' ve managed to categorise the economists who said leaving the EU would be bad for the economy with pollsters who thought Clinton would win and with other news outlets ? who wanted her to win . Is just anyone who was incorrect or in the case of your implications that Trump was a better candidate than Clinton and Brexit being good for the economy just waiting for time to prove them correct haha the same experts to you ? Does it concern you at all that there is a 122 billion hole in U . K . finances when even Osbourne ' s Punishment Budget was only to have a 30 billion hole ? Or is what the experts on the matter said would happen actually happening live on tv , coming straight from the mouth of the Chancellor not enough for you ? Unfortunately I ' ve had conversations with you where you ' ve lied before and here we go again . You said You ' ve got the New York Times admitting that instead of accurately reporting on the elections they had infact become cheerleaders for one of the n y t i m e s m a k e s a s t u n n i n g r e d e d i c a t i o n a f t e r reflectingontrumpsvictory and you STILL don ' t understand that there ' s more going on than meets the eye . What New York Times said in that very same link you posted right at the top We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign . Hardly sounds like admitting they were cheerleading for one of the candidates does it ? The letter only said they got wrong who they thought would win nothing about supporting one candidate over the other . Like our last discussion I highly recommend you actually read the links the post as evidence for your side so as not to be seen a fool when they say the opposite of what you claim they do . But please instead of making any actual arguments feel free just to call me and everyone else who disagrees with you fuckwits standing around toilets with spoons in their mouths . It certainly doesn ' t make you look cleverfunny .