I don ' t think this one ' s a conspiracy , guys . It ' s probably just people who voted for Hilary donating a dollar it two . Those add up . <| sep |> BUFFALO NO GOAL SABRES <| sep |> Found it , thanks a bunch for pointing me in the right direction . I couldn ' t quite follow the instructions but I found a setting under Locale Services that restricts user locales to a list of my choice , and it works ! <| sep |> 1 . Columbus 2 . Johnson 3 . Yes 4 . YesBonus 0 . 935 <| sep |> Let ' s just say she won ' t have any problems with childbirth . <| sep |> I ' ll give that a try . I certainly will try to put something under my knees , that will hopefully eliminate the hyper extension . <| sep |> Awesome . Do you have pictures ? <| sep |> Exactly . They ' re also never going to check whether the CAswhose certs are trusted implicitly are trustworthy . Of course not . That ' s why those CAs must build enough trust to get their certs rolled into browsers and OSs . You don ' t quite understand the concept of trust . That isthe problem in a nutshell . Do you trust the likes of Diginotar , Comodo , Trktrust ? You have to . That or you stay off the internet at large and stick to your own network with your own certs that you and only you trust . I will not trust your selfsigned cert . Period . I can ' t be sure I got the one you meant to send me . But if you can get it signed by a CA that I already trust , I can go all the way back up the chain and verify that the cert I got claiming to be yours really is yours . The issue is completely orthogonal to the Internet . You can have trust , strong crypto , everything on the Internet without even coming close to some centralized business scheme like CAs . You ' ve got a better solution ? I bet the internet would love to pick your genius mind for a bit . We would all love a better solution to any problem . If you have a better idea for verifying the identity of someone across the internet , we ' re all ears .