How do I become a god ? <| sep |> enjoy and thank you ! <| sep |> but really , we say were just being nice when we just silently judge the rude ones . <| sep |> Of course it makes sense to lose to NE , ATL and SEA and beat NOS , SF , and ARI , but these are the Rams , when did they ever make any sense ? Now that I know they can beat the seahawks in some crazy scenario , this is the year they go chalk and lose to NE , ATL , and SEA . <| sep |> It feels pretty fantastic <| sep |> There are other games ? <| sep |> I don ' t know what is the deal between you two , but I ' m chipping in here more objectively 1 . Difference in position Lingard is a winger Drogba is an outandout striker for Chelsea . You would expect the goalscoring ratios to differ even between acclaimed big game players . I don ' t see how it is difficult to comprehend Drogba is expected more likely to score being the forward for Chelsea as compared to Lingard , who plays on the wing with the primary objective of supplying our # 9 . 2 . Player maturity Comparing a mature Drogba ' s average statistics with Lingard ' s current is pretty criminal . Again , you would expect a player to perform best at his peak , typically the 2730 years of age range generally speaking . Lingard ' s had what , oneandahalf seasons ? 3 . Goals aren ' t everything It ' s simple , I don ' t expect anyone to comment on any player unless he ' s watched him play more than a couple of times . The fact that your only argument is the goalscoring ratios between Drogba Lingard is outdated unreliable . For all the goals that Lingard have not scored , have you considered the alternative areas of the game in which he has contributed ? I won ' t compare him with Drogba in this area because I haven ' t seen much of the Ivorian ' s play , but what I can see is an excellent work rate decent team play from Lingard . The only big game I ' ve seen him really falter was in the recent Manchester derby that we lost . Otherwise , he ' s been relatively constant underrated , but quietly efficient .