I ' d upvote you , but then more people would see your rare pepe . I ' ll keep this one for the darkest of days . <| sep |> Look this a great picture but there isn ' t any magic in his eyes . What is this baby like 5 or 6 months ? His brain is mush and he probably just has to poop or is gassy . <| sep |> This hype train is so last year bih <| sep |> I have Jennings in my flex spot but am wondering if I should sit him for edelman <| sep |> Iago ' s on fire , your defense is terrified <| sep |> There are a host of reasons why a corporate entity would not be ok with that but mostly how do you make your open source secure ? You need a top tier programmer . who should just be able to fix it himself , if it is fixable , if the $ exists to do it , and the will . Regarding the tool for DS 1 how would the corporation ensure it doesn ' t have a back door ? My limited understanding is that it is near impossible to scan every line of code the only safe way is to have your paid for programmer do it all himself . Ironically everyone who uses the watch dog tool is himself a cheater having thrown away the EULA and thus can ' t be trusted . Gamers don ' t say it often enough but it is a valid contract .