Nah he capitalized Because so all of the time he saved was wasted . Not to mention he should ' ve put because in quotations and it shouldn ' t be capitalized . <| sep |> And they ' re the only ones . <| sep |> lesser of two evils situation that doesn ' t really do anything to solve the problemYou ' re correct in that my post clarifies how one of those evils is quantifiably less than the other evil . So using the factor of ten given in the graphic , and your figures of 4085 %, amount of soy produced could be reduced by 3676 . 5 %. the factor of 10 is likely an overestimation for factory farming , but undoubtably land use would be significantly reduced Obviously this is not the type of problem which is ever going to be 100 % solved , because the problem is humans must produce food via farming to survive . So inherently the solution is always going to be a lesser of two evils situation . What other solution is there besides making our food production more efficient . ? I support lab grown food google Quorn by purchasing it , but you can ' t count on techmiracle justtakeonepill solutions . The environmental impact of humans must be mitigated by MANY solutions . Discounting meat consumption reduction on the basis of it ' s a lesser of two evils is like telling somebody not to bother taking shorter showers to save water because it ' s a lesser of two evils . Thank you for replying , I really enjoy the discourse as well ! Happy Thanksgiving .