Pao , RIGHT in the kisser <| sep |> Haha deal . Although tbh make it 5 years , it ' s going to take a long hard battle to get these fuckers . They have a lot of money . <| sep |> Well if you ' re a Trump supporter your ability to judge right from wrong is suspect so his support for her doesn ' t mean much <| sep |> I respect you and I enjoy having you as a guest in the comments , but using that weird here is not okay . <| sep |> Does that guy have a backwards hat on ? Bitchin '<| sep |> What about proportional allocation of electoral votes ? That would make more sense since a situation where a state of 5 million is lost by just 10 k votes means both candidates split the EC in that vote . This is far more representative and fair than what you ' re suggesting since it forces the candidates to have to weigh all states . Winning by larger margins or smaller margins would actually mean something even in solid red or solid blue states so it would provide incentive for everyone to vote and have it matter . I feel this is far superior . You can even adopt a primary style split of electoral votes the way delegates are split . It even gives third parties a fighting chance to perhaps squeeze in a few electoral votes here and there and gain traction . The current winner takes all system sucks . Why ? Because a candidate could win swing states by less than 500 votes and lose several other states by millions of votes and still win technically . The worst case scenario I believe is winning with 38 % of the vote . Splitting EC votes proportional to your vote share fixes that .