How would I do this properly ? I ' d like to hide my cables , but I don ' t know the proper way and don ' t want to just hack away at my wall and find out I screwed it up and now need to redo the sheetrock just to hide a few cables . <| sep |> Yeah , Jamal Murray is the truth now <| sep |> Not really ? They are all part of the easter season or easter cycle . So they might not be closely connected timewise , but there are strong thematic links . Ascension day and pentacost ' s meaning are always explained in relation to easter . <| sep |> Replace wings with helicopter and it ' s perfectly reasonable . So you ' re actually saying that I can rightfully claim the 2 nd story of your house with a helicopter ? No , you ' re not saying that and that ' s the point . Yes , I suppose with the security forces being paid as well this wouldn ' t be feasible . Exactly . Even without your security forces you can ' t do it . Factor in that you need to pay your security it becomes even more difficult . That ' s not even factoring in the human factor You ' re expecting people to come work for less pay in which there are armed guards watching over them as they work . That ' s an incredibly hostile work environment especially when far more peaceful and pleasant options are available with your competitor . The only problem here is that you ' re both avoiding the question , and seem to think it ' s impossible for a capitalist to be more efficient than the coops . Without the State backing the absentee claim , there ' s no way for a capitalist enterprise to be more efficient . It ' s physically impossible . You have to bear all the costs directly that you currently rely on the State providing . While some of those costs are also present in the cooperative , most of those costs do not apply to the cooperative model . Regardless , you ' re still dodging the question . No I directly answered it . Remember ? What was my answer ? I answered it , even within your ridiculous scenario , I answered it . You ' re still fighting the hypothetical because you don ' t want to give the answer you know you have to . You want to drag this into scenarios of about how he acquired it etc etc so we never actually get to the meat of it . How he acquired it is the meat of it ! A guy owns a factory . How does he own this without the State backing his claim ? People are willing to work for him . What is he offering that would A Provide a greater work environment than the cooperative competitor B Be a greater cost effective investment than the cooperative competitor He has enough money to be profitable for years and pay security guards to defend his factoryWhy would anyone work there ? Why would someone work for less with armed guards watching over them ? The how and why are the meat of the issue . The answer to your question as proposed is No one would work for him outside of the very rare happy slave . He would go out of business and now has to figure out how to pay his armed guards who now have guns and no money . That ' s a very dangerous combination for him . So what does our socialist society do ? Nothing . We watch and laugh as his business fails and now he has to figure out what to do with some pissed off armed guards that hate him for not paying them .