Please post more ! <| sep |> Your own citation agrees totally with my argument . So much so that I could even have used it as a citation in my original response to you . Of course , I would not cite this ' study ' as it ' s based upon a personal survey , which again , I ' ve singled out as the single most unreliable tool possible . Even so , it claims that reproducibility basically goes p h y s i c s c h e m i s t r y b i o logymedicineotherwhatever that means . I am curious if you even read this source before producing it for me . If you don ' t mind , I ' m going to close this off here . If anything , you ' ve further convinced me that the place where I ' ve set my bar is appropriate and your source also confirms it . Although you claim that Neuro is worse than traditional psychology , I ' m sorry to have to say that I no longer give you credibility in that claim based upon the lack of credibility in the rest of your argument . I see that you ' ve written quite a lot below your source but if you ' ve been unable to sway me thus far , it seems impossible that you would now . Psychology is still not a science . Have an awesome Thanksgiving .