It ' s called trickle down when you cut taxes on rich people and they spend more and improve the economy . Profit sharing is not the same thing . <| sep |> Yes they are ! <| sep |> FE 1 . It ' s got a boat load of bugs <| sep |> Just as a point of clarification , what ' s the difference between heavy fighters or any fighterbomber really and gunships in the context of SC or Scifi in general ? I know IRL Gunships are generally used against infantryground targets or to support allied infantryground targets , but how does that translate to Star Citizen ? There might be a bit of planetary infantry combat , but I doubt enough to dedicate a ship to it <| sep |> Big bad wolf isn ' t a worgen . It ' s a wolf <| sep |> There are many heuristics that work without falsification , in fact most probabilistic epistemologies contain nothing to the effect of a final conclusive falsification . Certainly fair enough , but probabilistic epistemologies rely on probabilities , where something happens some % of the time , and doesn ' t some other % of the time . If you are totally unable to even calculate probabilities , ie there is no possible instance where you could even tell if X happened or failed to happen , then you ' d be left without very much solid ground to stand on . It could well be that there is a condition evidencing the truth or falsehood of a claim , and that the condition has already been resolved , meaning there is no longer the possibility of falsification , as the proposition was presented afterthefact . Fair enough . Of course , this opens one up to various biases that are avoided in scientific methodology , but scientism is not the only way of avoiding those biases . I certainly didn ' t mean to imply that scientism was the only way to do it . Heck , falsification and probabilistic epistemologies alone do not scientism make , so it ' s certainly possible to combine those two and not fall for scientism .