I read let ' s disable tank sinks . I would ' ve agreed . <| sep |> Michigan and iirc PA have paper ballots . You can ' t hack paper <| sep |> Appello alla tipa davanti a me . Hai rotto il cazzo , hai una voce insopportabile s , l ' accento meridionale contribuisce , smettila di lamentarti di ogni fottuto aspetto . Non me ne frega una sega se quelli dell ' altro corso hanno preso tutti 30 . Stai zitta o divento come il Magnotta . <| sep |> So you ' re a computer scientist who doesn ' t believe in user error ? That ' s a new one to me . LolI said that where exactly ? And the whole stupidity fueled event created fake news claiming vote switching was a thing . You ' re talking about one specific incident . It wasn ' t just one , there was one case where the staff couldn ' t figure out how to fix it either and had to switch to paper . Having said that , it wasn ' t evidence of fraud it could have just been an embarrasing bug in the software . So why are you suddenly turning a blind eye to fraud now ? What fraud ? Some people claim a statistical anomaly but Nate Silver said the effect disappears if you make some obvious adjustments . This doesn ' t look like fraud at all , it looks like people who are convinced Hillary won massaging data until the answer they want comes out . If you ' ve ever worked with business intelligencebig data you should know that you can look at data in many dimensions to pull out all kinds of factoids but you have to be careful how much weight you give them . I suspect if you gave me long enough with this data I could find a dimension that would suggest fraud pulling votes to Hillary . Weird you and your kind were so passionate about it before but now you ' re ok with potential fraud ? Me and my kind ? I wasn ' t passionate about it before . My stance has always been that it probably happens to some extent but it ' s probably not substantial enough to change the general and even if it were substantial , both sides would probably be doing enough to cancel each other out anyway . I always took Trump ' s claims to be political base covering for an anticipated loss . I just find it hilarious how harsh you people were to republican ' s raising concerns and how now every instance of remotely possible fraud should be pursued as long as it takes . You couldn ' t handle the election but you were ok with 911 , thousands of troops killed in two bullshit wars , one of largest natural disasters on US soil , and an economy in shambles ? Do you truly believe 911 wouldn ' t have happened under Gore ? The wars were nonsense but Gore would have also been pressured into some kind of knee jerk response to 911 . I ' m with you that Bush was a horrible president but Gore was wrong to challenge the result , keep the country in turmoil only to lose anyway . What he should have done is what Bernie Sanders is doing now look to the future , fix the catastrophic problems in the party pandering to the right isn ' t working , get a movement going , try to steer the political process as best they can until the next election . That ' s a powerful response that can inspire for future elections . What Gore did , and what you ' re doing now looks like a tantrum . You didn ' t get the result you wanted so the system must be broken or hacked . If Gore had done what Bernie is doing maybe we would only have had to suffer a less damaging 4 years instead of a catastrophic 8 . My biggest fear would be that if Hillary was given the election after the fact , the party goes back to its broken status quo we get 48 years of HillaryKaine followed by a Kaine run when what needs to happen is to get these chickenhawk corporatists out of the party . The US already has the republicans for that view point .