Yeah in the good ending where you are proven innocent you just do nonlethal take downs <| sep |> Let ' s crush these purple fucks ! And , as you may have heard , FUCK the packers ! <| sep |> They dont this is fake an photoshopped . <| sep |> Because of course you know all about this . I shall never doubt you again <| sep |> Ether you got a bad radio or their transmitter was probably acting up <| sep |> I wish some of you would step out of the fanboi costume , it ' s really annoying . <| sep |> For me it was the Blasted Lands . I remember completely losing my shit when I came across the Dark Portal area . <| sep |> Other way around there bud . <| sep |> Cool . Jaake naacho <| sep |> I fucking hate getting catfished by the GOP . <| sep |> If it ' s a theory don ' t call it a study . If it ' s not a single theory don ' t call it a theory . If it ' s a framework describe the framework . arrive at coherent collective preferencesThis is not logical . Individuals make choices , not collectives . Making observations about groups of individuals making choices does not cause them to become coherent collective preferences . That would be a false assumption of the observer . How can we rank different social alternatives in an order of social welfare ? First , you don ' t assume to make a science out of something that is not a science . You want to study phenomena , then study them . If your studies allow you to develop theories then you should be able to explain your theories . Apart from contributing to our understanding of collective decision procedures , social choice theory has applications in the areas of institutional design , welfare economics , and social epistemology . In other words , it ' s technocratic psuedoscience .