YES YES THESE FUCKING BASTARDS ! Was sitting here thinking who I could whine about then I saw your comment and it all comes flowing back for them useless pricks . I ' m nearly convinced that the Pearson centres who do the Theory tests have quotas . Most useless shower of old , ignorant pricks . Like you know the kind who you know are on the verge of incontinence but because they ' re older than you and everyone else they feel you owe them and can be condescending towards . Like nothing about their procedure really make any sense . So I attempted my theory three times , first time I sat it I was two off getting it and nailed the hazard perception cause it ' s absolute pish . Got loads of questions that appeared nowhere in any of the bookets or apps I downloaded to practice with . I thought fair enough gonna have to learn them for next time . But naw , for some reason you can ' t do any remediation . Like what the fuck it ' s not a fucking academic exam , it ' s all information that ' s pertinent for drivers to know . But if you fail your theory , you can ' t get a script back to learn the questions you previously got wrong . Y ' know those questions directly relating to the wellbeing of yourself and others on our national highways ? Aye those questions . Tried that again a few more times including once when I was 90 % way through the exam and the power went out and I had to put up a fight to even get a resit then when I do finally get the multiple choice section passed I get the results and I see that the hazard perception , which as noted earlier is absolute pish and nearly conceivably easy to pass , is the part I failed . See this time I did the test it was at the very beginning of the new year and Pearson had changed their hazard perception to a more update computer generated view as opposed to some shitebox cataloguing it ' s journeys through nondescript britain with a dashcam . Prior to this I had never even came close to fucking up the HP section of the test . It was pure muck , you get descending amount of points from 9 to 0 depending on how late or early you see the hazard . In the ~ 14 odd sections of the HP section I supposedly got a score of 0 in 9 of the clips . Which means I entirely missed the hazard in 9 clips , which was not the case . I get out and plead my case to the old curmudgeon at the desk and explain to her how there ' s no way this is correct and that it might be something to do with the new test that I was assuming only came in over the Xmas period . Then she asks me Did you click loads of times ! ? No I clicked it once when I saw a hazard and again if it developed further Well you should have been clicking lots to make sure Aye good one . These are the people who are the gateway for young drivers to our roads . and it ' s not even like I ' m just pissed at the fact I haven ' t got my license yet , because the multiple choice failures are mostly down to me being a lazy fuck . But still Pearson can suck a serious bag of dicks .