The explanation I was given was that they called it a goal on the ice , so they couldn ' t determine that the puck wasn ' t in the net under his pad . It was inconclusive , so they definitively couldn ' t tell if the puck was in the net or not . Does this make sense to anyone ? Have they commented on why it wasn ' t ruled goaltender interference ? <| sep |>## ONCE IN OFFICE , I WILL APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO LOOK AT WHAT uspez HAS DONE , FOLKS BELIEVE ME . ##<| sep |> making love to a guy who ' s good in bed <| sep |> oops my bad , thought it was hodge for some reason <| sep |> Mobil 1 synthetic <| sep |> I don ' t know , I ' m not a mod . I ' m personally against the rule but it has a purpose in separating out trips and dubs from 100 m gets or 2 b gets .