If a job is within my pay range I ' ll take a look at it . If the posting seams reasonable and not outrageous then I ' ll apply . Anything left over at the end of the ' month ' for connections I ' ll use up applying for jobs at a higher rate than I would normally quote to see how they go as it ' s effectively a free chance to see if my pricing is reasonable . <| sep |> inb 4 bill Cosby roofie jokes <| sep |> I find it funny that they took both of the reviews down already lol <| sep |> Classic commando . Long and thin , a bit like a letter opener . <| sep |> Philosophy ' s primary concern is the pursuit of truth . That does not mean that philosophy is , in and of itself , truthful . I absolutely agree . I also agree that it is hard to call an idea you don ' t like pseudophilosophy , just like it would be silly to call a book you don ' t like pseudoliterature . You could call it bad philosophy , but presumably it ' s still philosophy . I think we ' re pretty much in agreement , but have slightly different but probably mostly overlapping outlooks on this . I think if one is being really technical , there aren ' t such things as scientific facts though . One reason is thatas I have generally seen itscience can disprove things , but it doesn ' t really prove them . And even then , the nature and amount of evidence needed to disprove a hypothesis is debatedsome philosophers have dedicated large parts of their careers trying to characterize just what pseudoscience is . I personally jive more with Feyerabend , who kinda thinks a formalized distinction between pseudoscience and real science isn ' t a great idea . However , I get what you ' re sayinggenerally what we call science has an aspect of falsifiability that ' s not often possible in philosophy .