Cheena is literally China in Bahasa . The English word China is derived from Malay Cina pronounced cheena , and ultimately derived from the Qin Dynasty . <| sep |> holy shit lol <| sep |> When has the beginning of a Pokemon game ever been hard ? <| sep |> Yes . This one . I cannot click the drop down list <| sep |> People are cunts <| sep |> I can ' t help you but please add me , I would like to have Klang <| sep |> Talking with some girl on tinder omegle about lesbianism . She said she was . Eventually when she asked for my number i asked her age . She was 14 . <| sep |> I do not blame them at all , haha . <| sep |> Indeed . In a properly distributed voting system manual counting is not a big of a task as it might seem to be . Just make sure that the amount of votes cast per polling station is low enough to be counted manually within a reasonable timeframe by the onsite staff . Manual counting by staff at each polling station also decreases the likelyhood of largescale fraud . You would need a conspiracy consisting of a huge amount of people to be able to influence the elections . And if you make sure that both the actual counting process as well as the results are open and transparent any meaningful counting fraud will be almost impossible . This is how we do it over here in The NetherlandsPolling stations usually have a few hundred votes casts during the day . The largest of polling stations major trainstations might have 2000 votes cast . There are about 10000 polling stations for about 13 million eligable voters . Each station is manned by a three to zevenperson volunteer team . These staff members are forbidden to show any party affiliation or preference during their work as polling official and it is standard practice that these teams are always non or multipartisan . The teams are selected by the municipal government . Each polling station is open to anyone that wants to monitor the polling proces while the station is open . After the stations close , counting commences . Everyone present prior to close will be able to monitor the counting process and has the legal right to protest or raise concerns . These concerns are then made part of the public record by adding them in the official report for that station . After counting , the vote counts are both reported to the people still present at the polling station and also to the municipal central polling station . Ballots are packed and sealed for transport to city hall in case a recount is neccesary . Vote counts are added and published per municipality , but they are also published per polling station . This means that everyone can verify whether the vote counts from their local polling stations are reflected correctly in the vote totals . Even if no one is monitoring the counting process in a polling station , you would still need to have all members of the polling station staff on board to be able to commit voting fraud . And as the amount of votes that they are responsible for is small , the influence on the outcome of the election would be marginal . To actually change the outcome of the election , You would need a large scale conspiracy consisting of a huge amount of polling station volunteers . Also , anyone or any organization who decided to monitor the counting process would be able to upset your little conspiracy . We threw out electronic voting machines about 10 years ago . Specically due to the concern that recounts are impossible without a paper trail and that large scale election fraud would be possible without the need for a large conspiracy and that it would be completely untraceable . Since then , voting has been done in the old fashioned way paper and pencil in every municipality . The old voting machines we had over here simply registered their votes in memory and would print a receipt with the election counts at the end of the day . A recount would simply be a reprint of the stored counts . There was no way to actually verify the result . The manufacturer was a private company , the software closed source . Even isolating a number of those machines and doing a voting simulation verifying the output to the votes that were input would never have guaranteed that the machines would count correctly during actual voting . Who knows what smart algorithms one could make up to identify whether the machine is used in an actual voting situation or a simulation . Volkswagen cars did exactly that , so it ' s not so hard to imagine a voting machine doing it and only committing fraud when they detect an actual real voting session . If electronic voting ever returns over here , it would have to be a system with a waterproof paper trail . Something that can be monitored in exactly the same way as paper ballots can . I would also urge for a obligatory and random manual recount of a select part of the votes for example , by having an official draw a small percentage say 0 . 1 percent or 0 . 5 percent of polling stations after the election closed and require those stations to manually recount . If such a recount would detect any discrepancy between the paper trail and the automated vote count , it would be obvious to require a total paper recount .