yeah i ended up buying the digital code . waiting for a verification tho haha <| sep |> Please for the love of god take off cascading numbers , at least for the videos <| sep |> Yep , every game my team has like 34 adc mains . And the only one who usually does good is the one who actually gets adc . <| sep |> Expected this after I saw it ingame . rpouts did not disappoint <| sep |> Interesting . How can I catch up ? <| sep |> So i can get a pny gtx 1060 3 gb for $ 159 from jet with the promo code drop 20 <| sep |> or a 200 gem chest . With 70 items <| sep |> He made me a spring razor , and I ' m doing a ghostnonlethal play through . <| sep |> Let me change your mind about NASA studying earth science . If we ever want to colonize another planet we need to understand a lot about planetary science . We live on a planet that is the best study case for us to learn about . Second , we ' ve always studied out and in . NASA produces some of the best equipment for doing study by sattelite , and for many different areas . Third , science is highly collaborative and there is lots of work where expertise from mulitple agencies is used . There are plenty of joint NASA and NOAA studies in earth science . Fourth , there is 60 years of institutional knowledge at NASA in earth sciences , and the infrastructure to support it . It is a waste to try to export that to another agency that either doesn ' t exist or isn ' t prepare to take on those tasks . Either way we ' d lose things in the transfer . You ' d interrupt ongoing research . You ' d break up longterm monitoring studies . Fifth , the science community see this as intrusive and retaliatory . When you want a climate science denier to lead the EPA , you ' ve already ruffled feathers in the science community . There already ways to determine funding like NSF peerreviewed panesl that stays mainly in the hands of scientist and determine the merit of a project , and when politicians especially with no science background start wanting to force the research direction it politicizes the science further and harms it . Of course , there are some determination of missionfunding level at the highest level , but even there usually that is being managed by science advisors , rather than the whims of the President themselves or Congress . A couple years back there was some additions to grant applications that made the scientist sign something saying it was in the national interest or some other pledge , which was pushed by the Republican congress because they like to criticize funded studies not on their merit but on how they understand it superficially . In conclusion , I think if you take more than a skindeep look at the earth science work and mission of NASA , you will see why defunding it is a bad idea . edit Also see nasaearthsciencebudget