Uh . Yeah , wow . Dunno how I didn ' t see the issue with Baton and Specs . <| sep |> The idea that she intentionally destroyed evidence holds no water . It ' s true that they were deleted after the subpoena , but the implication that she directed this to happen is completely unfounded . However , the implication that Clinton deleted emails relevant to the subpoena in order to avoid scrutiny is unprovable if not flat wrong . I ' ll leave it to you if you ' d like to read why , it ' s pretty short and straightforward . ometerstatements 2016 oct 09 d o n a l d t r u m p d o n a l d t r u m p sayshillaryclintondeleted 33000 em <| sep |> Thanks , bot . I ' d like you to know that you ' re appreciated . I love you man . <| sep |> Of course everything can be improved , but this is maybe the most natural , real sounding passage I ' ve seen on this sub . I don ' t think the snow bit makes a good opening , but this is just an except , so maybe it ' s not as much of a cold open as it seems . I disagree with those saying you need more excitement , not everything starts with a firestorm or a bloodbath . I think if people reread the openings of their favorite books , they ' ll notice that most start out boring .