Once again , I ' m not defending the conclusions that the article draws from the study in any way . However , that is still far from the anecdotal evidence that you laid out at the outset . The study is incredibly small and that ' s very likely a flaw in it I ' m not going to find a way behind the paywall but it ' s based on hard evidence as opposed to little stories or something that happened to someone else . There ' s not an equivalence between a scientific , peerreviewed no matter how flawed study and something that happened to my girlfriend , and it ' s moronic to draw an equivalency between the two if that ' s what you ' re trying to do ? .<| sep |> Or I mean basically any super effective priority move . damn rock types suck .