We are having deals all day long ! You can see our list of 2 hour deals , and we have a 40 % off sale on select Biblical Series coins going on now through Sunday as well ! <| sep |> Where you support having Bannon fired . That ' s not a legal ramification . I ' m not saying he should be jailed , fined , or otherwise face legal troubles due to it . Only social consequences . We ' re not talking about boycotting , we ' re talking about having someone fired from their job . How are these different ? In both cases it only happens if there is enough people who agree such that we are able to effect change by virtue of social pressure . But it is morally bankrupt to boycott a company for one person ' s personal opinions . Why ? If I do not want my money going to support a Nazi , why is it morally bankrupt to boycott the company that they run ? You wouldn ' t be saying this if people were boycotting companies because a gay guy , or a black guy , or an Asian , or whatever identity you would want to defend , was the CEO of the company . Sure I would . If people want to boycott a company because the CEO is gay , they are perfectly within their rights to do so . I would hope that there aren ' t enough people willing to do so that it would result in enough pressure for the company to take action , but would never call those boycotting morally bankrupt simply because they chose to boycott a company over something they believe in . I can have my opinion , but my opinion shouldn ' t be the basis for whether I am hired or fired , my actions should be . And his action was to give monetary support and services to Nazis . If you ideologically support Nazis and their beliefs it is literally impossible for you to represent me , a Jew or any minority . You and I both know it is to the end goal of weeding out undesirable opinions from office , and thus majority shall only be represented . Interesting then that my point is that the problem is that he would only represent the majority and not the minority at all and that is what the problem is . But more fundamentally , how do you suppose we should prevent people who intend to do harm , or who support those who intend to do harm , from enacting this harm ? How do you intend for us to enact social change if it is morally bankrupt to not want people who have harmful beliefs to be in office ?