If you have the cash lying around . Why not . Literally the same DPS , longbow has more range <| sep |> The couple on the front page are not indicative of the sub . <| sep |> If you haven ' t already , check out rvaporents , they ' re pretty big on vaping . rwaxpen too for sure . Personally , I want something stronger than that . I don ' t want to sit and chief this thing all day to get where I ' m going , I want like 35 hits and be lit . <| sep |> Not following your dreams <| sep |> You got all three barrows items I don ' t have yet after 450 chests in a single one . <| sep |> Yea , i noticed . They might come at a later date , these are all games that they have tested and made videos about . <| sep |> trump would agree <| sep |> I used to believe this was possible . Unfortunately , at least based on my experience speaking to people , there ' s too much information overload and misinformation in the world to have this approach succeed . Case in point Haskell is IMO undeniably , farandaway better than NodeJS in every way one in comes to the concurrency story . I ' m convinced that any semiknowledgeable Haskeller could sit down with a NodeJS person and , in under an hour , prove that the Haskell concurrency model simply puts NodeJS to shame . However , there ' s been so much hype about how great NodeJS is , and how the callbackbased nonblocking IO system is the only way to get good performance , that most people will never get to that 1 hour sitdown with a Haskeller . We need an edge the marketing style activities of putting together short videos , success story blog posts , and maybe even a little bit of going on the offensive and demonstrating where other languages suffer hugely . I ' ve seen people in the community say that we should just prove Haskell ' s greatness on its own merits and not get caught up in this kind of competition . I ' m unfortunately convinced that , with that approach , Haskell will not see widespread adoption .