Yeah , I go to bravo sometimes , but I ' m usually in charlie <| sep |> awww . we missed one of my favorite lines . <| sep |> men ' s potential for violence which is so damning . You know what makes me laugh about this argument , is how they will literally use this against men even when those men are smaller , weaker or meeker than your average man , and also be completely missed when it comes to any woman that is bigger , stronger and meaner than your average womanapparently , these aren ' t scary or threatening at all , and their potential for violence just doesn ' t matter . What ' s even more disturbing is how often women will literally belittle and delegitimize men , as human beings and sexual partners , because they are weaker , smaller or meeker than your average maleespecially if he is in anyway weaker , smaller or meeker than them while still using the same logic to justify their fear and disdain against themthose men are dangerous because they are men , and men are scary because they are bigger , therefore my disdain for this smaller man is justified because he is a man . You can ' t have it both ways . What ' s the most disturbing though , is how you can have women essentially justify this hateful fear of men because men are violent while also actively neglecting how women socially and culturally instigate and reward violent dispositionsbehaviour in men . We live in a culture where women reward the alpha malewhich is far more of a human social concept than a naturally occurring one , and rewardin every sense of the word the male dominators over the male pacifists or the male givers .