I ' ve never played Rogue before but started on Malygogue this week . If theres one thing I know about that deck its that it needs a board clear . <| sep |> There is only one correct answer , and it ' s De Vliegende Hollander The Flying Dutchman at Efteling . It ' s basically a dark ride . The coaster bit isn ' t actually very good . <| sep |> Damn , the Lions are like the antiChargers this year . <| sep |> Thank god we have the Bill of rights here so something like this could never happen in the US amirite ? s <| sep |> A girl got fingered in KMart and all of highschool people would walk passed her and say . KMart . Very good looking <| sep |> One of the big things we ' ve interviewed upon in recent years is whether the candidate is extremely familiar with the algorithms in the STL rather than requiring extensive use experience with the STL in their current or previous roles . I want to see candidates who care enough about their career to have invested , as an absolute minimum , in buying their own copy of Josuttis ' The Standard C Library and having read a substantial part of it . In terms of experience writing fancy template metaprogramming , using lambdas etc that ' s all nice to have , but nothing like as important as a candidate who invests in their own skills to keep themselves current by studying the parts of the STL and Boost relevant to their current or previous roles . Quite a few games industry veterans take exception with this philosophy , but I don ' t care . For the teams we are on we want self starters proactively open to new ideas , not people who think they know better than the C standards committee without ever having served on the C standards committee . There are many good reasons to not use any of the STL containers or exceptions or RTTI in your codebase , but there are no good reasons to never use those in any codebase , and a candidate needs to be able to rationally say for any given use case what are the correct dependencies to use to get the job done to a high quality for the lowest cost . Obviously it ' s super great to see a candidate who has got a library into Boost or even the C standard , but they ' re very rare and to be honest , they usually have relocated to the US to jobs paying far above anything we can afford here in Europe . Nevertheless , if you ' re wanting to keep yourself relevant , trying to get a library into Boost is very good for you . The peer review is a particularly humbling experience demonstrating all the places where you fall short as a programmer and architect . I ' ve been trying for four years to date without success . Here ' s hoping for 2017 !