Play keep away . Hold onto both . <| sep |> If you drag the game out long enough your bots eventually go jungle and ignore the enemy pushing . <| sep |> I ' ve heard ! It ' s lucky bamboo and I will call it such from now on I just can ' t change the title . I will try those fixes , though ! <| sep |> No no , battle of God ' s , golden freeza , universal tournament , then future trunks . Zamasu is a character in the future trunks arc <| sep |> The message I was referring to was the one others here have mentioned , the whole You won ' t get anything out of an empty shell thing Doesn ' t the show establish that Rei isn ' t an empty shell ? I sincerely do not see the problem . When actual empty shells are created the audience ignores it , hence the spinoff Rei ' s made by Khara that are soulless and just empty shells get no attention and are in some cases even shunned . Moreover , Anno has ever since created empty shells in the forms of undeveloped superficial characters , which excludes the idea that he ' s against that sort of thing . and how Rei was meant to be creepy . I keep hearing that , but here ' s the problem it ' s an unfounded assumption . Where do you get that idea from ? Did Anno tell you this personally , or is it simply a subversive myth created by jealous fans to cope with Rei ' s popularity ? I ' m certain it ' s the latter . But let ' s assume it WAS the case that even though we don ' t have interviews , production notes or anything to prove it , that Rei was supposed to be just creepy , and was supposed to be disliked by the audience . Where is the problem then ? Is the claim here that Anno or other likeminded has some form of absolute authority on what an entire nation is supposed to like or not ? Can ' t people enjoy creepy characters ? Can ' t people enjoy horror movies or depressing , sad movies ? Can one really read Frankenstein or , The Modern Prometheus without acknowledging that the titular monster is a character one can sympathize with , and even like ? People don ' t remember Frankenstein , they remember Frankenstein ' s Monster , to the point that Frankenstein is now synonymous with the monster itself . It ' s not the intention that defines whether or not the audience takes to the character , it ' s the character itself and how it is presented . Anno actually presented Rein in a very sympathetic light the whole story , to boot . I don ' t think the idea that Rei ' s character was finished a that point makes any sense either . Consider the first episode , where Rei appears before Shinji as some form of ghost or apparition . Add to that the air of mystery built around the character up until that point , with the files of Rei having been deleted and hidden , the inexpressive behavior of the character and it ' s attachment to the Eva project ' s experiments . Somehow , Anno would have us believe that he had nothing else planned for this character or nowhere else to go with it . This despite the fact Rei ' s character went far beyond just showing a simple smile , and Anno himself attests on delving into material written by schizophrenics prior to establishing the character . If Anno was that invested in the character and had that much buildup already in the first six episodes , why on earth would a smile in episode six end the character ? Rei had already smiled in the previous episode anyway . Isn ' t Anno just grasping at straws here .