I do , EDS 3 , and honestly thought anyone could do that . I still kinda think anyone can do that . <| sep |> How dare the south front oppose Assad they should just accept his rule right ? <| sep |> Right now I ' d say May ' s hand looks something like 104 , off suit . <| sep |> So sorry to hear that . I had a close family member die of smoking too . When he got the news from his doctor the cancer was already pretty developed and the doctor said at that point it wasn ' t even worth quitting the cigs . It ' s heartbreaking . I wish you the best . <| sep |> My cousin Remy had an ex who ' s dad was in the Navy . He said the same thing . <| sep |> oh i see , ty <| sep |> You misread my comment . Go ahead and read it again . I ' m not asking 144 Hz vs 120 or 60 , I ' m asking about 185 Hz vs 144 Hz . Being as if you can notice that difference , certainly you ' d also notice the difference going up to 240 Hz . I currently own a 144 Hz display as I mentioned . I do notice and am able to act upon the difference between 144 Hz and 60 Hz . My visual reaction times ~ 160 ms are relatively good compared to the normal human spectrum , the median being around 265 ms , and I ' m sensitive in testing to 56 ms of added input lag w 8090 % accuracy . I ' m really sensitive to even small improvements and am able to leverage them . Going from 16 . 7 ms frame latency on a 60 hz screen down to 6 . 9 ms at 144 Hz is a huge improvement , but the higher up you go , that relative frame latency improvement delta gets smaller and smaller . At the same time while that aspect of a higher refresh rate might become less noticeable I was wondering if the difference is still as a whole noticeable because of the increased overall smoothness of moving images . I noticed that at 144 Hz in CSGO my ability to track moving targets along with my spraying ability improved immensely simply due to how smooth the image appeared . I personally can ' t go back to anything really under 100 Hz without it feeling weird .