I bet we still concede from set pieces <| sep |> Definitely trying to summon the great Timberwolves of yore . Y ' know , like Gugliotta and Troy Hudson . <| sep |> Can confirm , I am a thin person drinking Pepsi Max . <| sep |> That ' s too deep into YouTube <| sep |> Ok so it is only from the day this law becomes active they can see the internet history ? <| sep |> Edit I take back what I originally said , left my original comment with my edit at the end As long as anarchist excists there is no point to be an armorer , not even for team benefits since other decks like the maniac , crew chief and gambler are more usefull for that . Even with anarchist gone , that ' d just push players to either play with other decks that aren ' t armorer as the benefit of 35 % bonus armor is not great compared to crook ' s armor and dodge , rogue ' s dodge and muscle ' s health and healt regeneration . Or heck , supportive perk decks maniac 3 . Don ' t have any solid suggestions what to do with it sadly . Edit After reading what uMetrocop said I did what any half selfrespecting player should do and researched it . And goddamn I was wrong . Armorer is much better than I gave it credit for and I shouldn ' t have dismissed it because of the numbers . I still stand by that I personally find anarchist better , but armorer is much better than I gave it credit for and definitely holds up to the likes of muscle , rogue and crook .