I ' m sure they ' d only pay fir one ticket only , because it ' s not worth the risk of a discrimination lawsuit . An airline might need to make a policy regarding fatties because there are so many obese people taking up multiple seats . There are so few conjoined twins that they ' d just swallow the cost of the second ticket to save the trouble . A $ 5 ticket to the movies is probably cheaper than a 5 minute phonecall to your lawyer to say so , some pissed off conjoined twins are threatening to sue us for discrimination . <| sep |> Oh balls , I meant British ! <| sep |> that ' s assuming everyone votes on the same guy . if anything , the CURRENT system makes only a few states count . i mean , let ' s take california . HC got 5 . 5 mil votes , DT got 3 mil . realistically , the democrats were always going to win that state . in other words , it may as well not exist . same the other way around alabama may as well not exist in the current system people will GENERALLY vote for the republicans no matter what . not to mention it ignores a large part of voters within states due to winner takes all 4 . 7 million voters in florda are not being heard right now in not voting for donald trump in total . in colorado all the votes go to hillary , yet most voters didnt actually vote for her . people in small states simply count for more votes as well in the current system . with the popular vote at least for president , what is the ACTUAL downside ? residence between rural , urban and metropolitan area ' s is fairly evenly split . with popular vote you ' ll still need to rake in 50 % of votes and if more than half of actualy voters vote for someone , what ' s wrong with that ? should less populated area ' s be more powerfull than other area ' s and be heard more ? or should nationwide election actually try to make a proper representation of the nation rather than a weighted division between states ?