Steroidogenic factor-1  is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that plays a crucial role in the regulation of adrenal and gonadal development, function and maintenance. In addition to its classical role in regulating the expression of P450 steroid hydroxylases and other steroidogenic genes, involvement in other key processes such as cell survival/proliferation and cytoskeleton dynamics have also been highlighted for SF-1. SF-1 has a restricted pattern of expression, being expressed along the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and in steroidogenic organs since the time of their establishment. Reduced SF-1 expression affects proper gonadal and adrenal organogenesis and function. On the other hand, SF-1 overexpression is found in adrenocortical carcinoma and represents a prognostic marker for patients’ survival. This review is focused on the current knowledge about SF-1 and the crucial importance of its dosage for adrenal gland development and function, from its involvement in adrenal cortex formation to tumorigenesis. Overall, data converge towards SF-1 being a key player in the complex network of transcriptional regulation within the adrenal gland in a dosage-dependent manner. Both in humans and in mice, the structure of the adrenal cortex undergoes substantial remodeling postnatally.Adrenal glands are small paired organs located above each kidney, which participate in the coordination of the mammalian stress response alongside the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland . They haNuclear receptors (NR) represent one of the largest families of transcription factors, with approximately fifty members in mammals. They regulate essential biological processes by binding DNA and regulating the expression of target genes. NR family members are grouped into three classes further divided into seven subfamilies, according to their structural similarities . The NR5NR5A1 mutations are most often affected by variable degrees of dysgenesis [SF-1 was initially identified as a positive regulator of steroid P450 hydroxylases in adrenals and gonads , but hassgenesis ,10,11,12sgenesis ,14. In csgenesis ,15,16.In this review, we have tried to provide a comprehensive overview of our current knowledge about the role of the transcription factor SF-1 in adrenal cortex physiopathology, with a special focus on its role in tumorigenesis.NR5A1; Nr5a1) encoding SF-1 is located on human chromosome 9 and mouse chromosome 2 [The SF-1 protein consists of four hundred and sixty-one, and four hundred sixty-two amino acids in humans and mice, respectively . The genmosome 2 , and conAGGYCR-3′ sequences [Notably, its structure includes a DNA-binding domain (DBD) composed of two zinc fingers harboring a proximal (P) and a distal (D) box conferring binding affinity to consensus 5′-YCAequences . Importaequences .The SF-1 N-terminal region upstream of the DBD is very short and does not possess a classical AF-1 domain, as observed in other nuclear receptors. The C-terminal part of the SF-1 protein contains a ligand-binding domain (LBD or E-domain) that includes a well-conserved AF-2 transactivation motif, which is also present in other ligand-dependent NRs ,20. In tNr5a1 transcripts in mice has revealed their presence as early as embryonic day (E) 9 in the adrenogonadal primordium (AGP), the common structure from which the adrenal gland and the gonads are derived [NR5A1 transcripts are first detected in the urogenital ridge at 32 days post-ovulation (dpo)/Carnegie stage (CS) 14 [SRY [Spatial and temporal profiling of  derived ,27,28. I (CS) 14 , before  14 [SRY ,29.Nr5a1 expression. In fact, in this species, Nr5a1 transcripts are detected throughout the development of the testis, whereas in the ovary it is not detected between E13.5 and E16.5 [NR5A1 transcripts are detectable in the ovary throughout its development [Nr5a1 expression have also been observed during adrenal development. After the formation of the gonadal (AG) and adrenal primordia (AP) from the AGP between E10.5 and E11, Nr5a1 continues to be expressed in adrenal progenitor cells [At E12.5 (mouse) or 44 dpo/CS18 (humans), gonadal differentiation begins with the formation of testicular cords and in mice is accompanied by sexual dimorphism of nd E16.5 ,27. Convelopment . In miceor cells . Howeveror cells . In adulor cells ,32. In for cells  and, lator cells ,35. In mor cells ,36. In mor cells ,37,38 anor cells ,40,41  [NR5A1 copy number gain (see below).The nhancers . As mentnhancers . Regardinhancers  and a pinhancers , both lois DAX-1 , which wis DAX-1 . DAX-1 iis DAX-1 , or by bis DAX-1 . In addiis DAX-1 . Early Sd Cited2 ; Wt1, in by Odd1  and Sall1 [Sall1 . MicroRNrs (ACT) ,83 and mAt the post-translational level, SF-1 activity is regulated by SUMOylation. This transcription factor is constitutively targeted to the nucleus, however, because of this post-translational modification, its nuclear distribution is modified. The main SUMOylation site of SF-1 is Lys194. This modification is associated with repression of its activity by recruitment of negative regulators, such as the DEAD-box protein DP103. The localization of SUMOylated SF-1 is restricted to nuclear speckles, thus, preventing its DNA-binding activity ,84. ConvNR5A1, a wide range of phenotypes is observed in patients: both gonadal and, more uncommonly, adrenal development and function may be affected, which leads to different degrees of gonadal dysgenesis, male infertility, primary ovarian and adrenal insufficiency [NR5A1 mutations causing adrenal failure are the G35E (heterozygote), R92Q (homozygote) and R255L (heterozygote) missense mutations affecting DNA binding. Among those cases, only the R255L mutation selectively affected adrenal function without producing a gonadal phenotype [A crucial factor regulating SF-1 expression and biological activity is represented by its dosage. The significance of SF-1 gene dosage has already been introduced above with regard to the adrenal defects in mice resulting from altered SF-1 expression. In general, any altered SF-1 dosage leads to non-physiological conditions both in mice and humans. In the case of heterozygous mutations of ficiency . Reportehenotype ,97.TP53 germline mutation (p.R337H) in the population [NR5A1 gene is located, was found [NR5A1 copy number and SF-1 protein overexpression were demonstrated in most cases of pediatric ACT [Analysis of both human and murine adrenal tissues has linked SF-1 overexpression to adrenocortical tumorigenesis, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of tumor formation (reviewed in ). An intpulation . In thisas found . Later otric ACT ,101,102.tric ACT .Nr5a1 gene developed adrenocortical neoplastic lesions (both dysplastic and nodular) with a frequency increasing with age [In an animal model, transgenic mice harboring YAC clones containing several copies of the rat with age ,103. In with age . The criwith age ,104. Thiwith age . Furtherwith age .-NOV/CCN3 encodes a secreted protein with pro-apoptotic properties which is a marker of the DZ in the human fetal adrenal cortex. Its expression is reduced in ACC. SF-1 overexpression in H295R cells significantly reduces NOV expression [pression ;-FATE1 encodes a protein enriched in mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM) which has an important role in modulating calcium transfer between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in ACC cells, being involved in the resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs [ic drugs ,110. In ic drugs , making -VAV2 encodes a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) which activates Rho family GTPases, important regulators of cell cytoskeleton, motility and invasion. VAV2 is a prognostic factor in ACC and its knockdown significantly inhibits H295R cell invasion in Matrigel activated by SF-1 overexpression [pression .It is remarkable that SF-1 overexpression in the H295R cell model was sufficient to induce modifications of gene expression which are consistent with patterns found in pediatric ACT, modulating the expression of genes related to cell cycle, apoptosis, cell adhesion and steroidogenesis ,106. ChIAltogether, these findings support a ‘Goldilocks’ model of transcriptional regulation by SF-1, in which the levels of active transcription factor protein must be ‘just right’ to direct transcriptional regulation of its physiological target genes . DecreasNOV/CCN3) induced by an increased dosage of SF-1 in the H295R cell model [These properties of SF-1 may also have an important role during human adrenal development: it has been reported, in fact, that higher levels of SF-1 are expressed in the FZ compared with the DZ , which cll model . It is tll model . In thisThe identification of upstream factors and signaling pathways finely tuning the differential expression of SF-1 in the different cell layers of the human fetal adrenal gland is then of utmost importance for future studies. This may be made easier by the recent development of an in vitro system to produce human fetal adrenal cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) .Homogeneous culture conditions obtained from patient-derived cell lines are a simple and low-cost tool to study druggable targets and mechanisms. They are widely used in pre-clinical studies, where many authors have identified drugs that can potentially be used in clinical trials . HoweverA great deal of effort has been focused on defining the role of TFs associated with the pathogenesis and/or prognosis of ACC. Those studies have been made possible by accessing publicly available transcriptome databases to evaluate the intratumoral microenvironment. Using the RNA-seq and clinical data from 78 samples from the TCGA ACC cohort , Muzzi eSince its discovery, the SF-1 transcription factor has generated wide interest, which has led to its designation as a “master regulator” of major endocrine organ development and physiology. A crucial role in the cellular processes allowing the establishment of the gonads and adrenals, their development and function has been widely demonstrated for SF-1. In particular, adrenal gland formation, maintenance, steroidogenesis and tumorigenesis are dependent on the tight regulation of SF-1 dosage in a time- and tissue-specific manner. Further studies are needed to improve our understanding of the mechanisms regulating both the expression and the biological activity of SF-1, which would allow us to better understand and counteract the pathological consequences of the alterations of its functional dosage.


Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and microRNA expression, play critical roles in cell differentiation and organ development through spatial and temporal gene regulation. Neurogenesis is a sophisticated and complex process by which neural stem cells differentiate into specialized brain cell types at specific times and regions of the brain. A growing body of evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone modifications, allow the fine-tuning and coordination of spatiotemporal gene expressions during neurogenesis. Aberrant histone modifications contribute to the development of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. Herein, recent progress in understanding histone modifications in regulating embryonic and adult neurogenesis is comprehensively reviewed. The histone modifications implicated in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases are also covered, and future directions in this area are provided. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors coordinate complex signaling pathways that modulate the expression of key regulators that determine NPC proliferation, fate specification, and differentiation.5 It occurs most actively during embryonic and perinatal stages but also continues throughout life in restricted regions of the brain, the forebrain subventricular zone (SVZ)6 and the hippocampal subgranular zone (SGZ).7 Adult neurogenesis can occur in non-canonical sites, depending on the animal species, age, and physiological/pathological states.8 Adult neurogenesis plays an important role in brain homeostasis and functions such as memory and learning. Alterations in adult neurogenesis have been associated with several brain diseases, including neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases.10The nervous system allows animals to obtain sensory inputs, integrate data, and move their bodies. It is divided into two main parts in vertebrates, the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The CNS includes the brain and the spinal cord, and the PNS is made up of nerves that branch out from the CNS and extend to all parts of the body. The CNS consists of two main cells, neurons and glial cells, which are generated from the neural stem cells (NSCs).13 Neuropsychiatric disorders have an early onset (autism and schizophrenia) or a relapsing-remitting course (mood disorder). Although they are associated with alterations in brain function, their apparent etiology is not characterized and the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. As with neurodegenerative disorders, it is well known that genetic and environmental factors contribute to the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders.15Neurodegenerative disorders caused by genetic and environmental factors result in loss of integration and function of neurons and even neuronal death. Since the world population is aging rapidly, numerous studies have been conducted to understand the molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Huntington’s disease (HD), in which aging constitutes a strong risk factor.20 Recently, several epigenetic mechanisms in response to extracellular factors have been shown to play a critical role in the control of gene expressions during neurogenesis.27 In addition, epigenetic dysregulation of neurogenesis contributes to several human diseases, including neurodevelopmental disorders, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative diseases, and neuropsychiatric diseases.28 Dysregulation in adult neurogenesis particularly appears to be a common hallmark in several neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases.Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene expression that are not attributed to alterations in the DNA sequence in response to intrinsic and extrinsic stimulations. Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and microRNA expression. Numerous studies demonstrate that epigenetic regulatory mechanisms are critical in the differentiation of various cells, including bone cells, neurons, cardiomyocytes, and blood cells.Herein, recent progress in understanding the role of histone modifications during neurogenesis is reviewed. Furthermore, the perturbation of histone modifications in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders to provide insights for new treatment of these neurological disorders is discussed.30 Histone undergoes various post-translational modifications including acylation , ADP-ribosylation, dopaminylation, glycosylation, methylation, phosphorylation, serotonylation, sumoylation, and ubiquitination.36 Various histone-modifying enzymes have been shown to catalyze the addition or removal of a specific histone modification. Recently, histone tail cleavage by various enzymes is regarded as an alternative modification to remove pre-existing tail modifications but retaining the histone folding region.39 Histone modifications exert critical effects on the interaction of different histones or histone–DNA interactions. Furthermore, histone modifications provide or remove binding sites for specific protein complexes, including histone-modifying enzymes, chromatin remodeling complexes, and transcription factors. Consequently, histone modifications regulate gene expression by altering the chromatin structure and protein–protein interaction.41 Here we focus on histone modifications and regulation related to neurogenesis and neurological diseases.A nucleosome is a fundamental unit of chromatin composed of 147 base pairs of DNA and an octamer of core histone proteins, two copies each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Histone proteins are basic and conserved from archaea to humans based on the amino acid sequence.Adding an acetyl group to a lysine residue on a histone neutralizes the positive charge on the lysine residue, weakening the interaction between the histone and DNA. Therefore, histone acetylation activates transcription. Histone acetylation is catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases or removed by histone deacetylases.44 For example, the GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) family includes GCN5/KAT2A and PCAF/KAT2B. The p300/CBP family includes p300/KAT3B and CBP/KAT3A. In addition, TIP60/KAT5, MOZ (MYST3)/KAT6A, MORF(MYST4)/KAT6B, HBO1(MYST2)/KAT7, and MOF(MYST1)/KAT8 are members of the MYST family named after the founding members MOZ, Ybf2/Sas3, Sas2, and Tip60.44Histone acetyltransferases  catalyze the transfer of an acetyl group from acetyl coenzyme A to form ε-N-acetyllysine on histone proteins. HATs are classified into several families based on their sequence homology Table .42–44 Fo48 Class I HDACs include HDAC1, 2, 3, and 8; HDAC1 and HDAC2 are involved in transcriptional corepressor complexes , and HDAC3 is related to the biological activity of other complexes (SMRT/N-CoR). Class II HDACs are subdivided into class IIa , and IIb (HDAC6 and 10). Class III HDACs are members of the sirtuin family, SIRT1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. HDAC11 belongs to the class IV HDAC family.49Histone deacetylation by histone deacetylases (HDACs) induces a closed chromatin structure. Therefore, HDACs are largely associated with transcriptional repression. Eighteen mammalian HDACs have been identified and divided into four classes  based on their sequence similarities to yeast HDACs Table .45–48 Cl51. Histone lysine methylation is catalyzed by histone lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) and erased by histone lysine demethylases (KDMs). KMTs are divided into two groups: lysine methyltransferases that contain the SET domain and lysine methyltransferases that do not contain the SET domain, such as DOT1L. The SET domain lysine methyltransferases are further divided into several families: H3K4 KMTs , H3K9 KMTs , H3K27 KMTs (EZH1 and EZH2), and H3K36 KMTs  (Table 53 Histone lysine demethylation is achieved by two conserved families of KDMs employing different reaction mechanisms: LSD (lysine-specific demethylase) demethylases and Jumonji C (JmjC) domain-containing demethylases. Members of the LSD family, including LSD1 and LSD2, undergo a FAD-dependent amine oxidation reaction to demethylate mono- and di-methylated lysine residues. LSD1  is the first identified histone demethylase, which catalyzes the demethylation of H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K9me1, and H3K9me2. The second family consists of JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases that use an oxygenase mechanism to remove the methyl group(s) from the specific mono-, di-, and tri-methylated lysine residues. The enzymatic activity of the JmjC domain depends on α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), Fe (II), and molecular oxygen as cofactors in the demethylation reaction.54 Approximately 30 JmjC domain-containing proteins have been identified  and histone demethylases (HDMs), can occur on the lysine or arginine residues of histone proteins. Lysine residues can be mono-, di-, or tri-methylated, and arginine residues can be asymmetric or symmetric di-methylated or mono-methylated. Histone methylation exerts an important effect on the transcriptional regulation; it can be considered an active mark or a repressive mark of transcription, depending on the methylated residue. Methylation of histone H3 on lysine 4 (H3K4), lysine 36 (H3K36), lysine 79 (H3K79), or arginine 17 (H3R17) is largely involved in transcriptional activation. In contrast, methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9) and lysine 27 (H3K27) or histone H4 on lysine 20 (H4K20) is often related to transcriptional repression57 Several reports have shown that arginine methylation is a dynamic modification that occurs cyclically, suggesting the existence of an arginine demethylase.58 However, the arginine demethylase(s) is yet to be clarified.Histone methylation of arginine is catalyzed by protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs). PRMTs are classified into three types based on their catalytic activity. Type I PRMTs  asymmetrically di-methylate arginine residues while Type II PRMTs (PRMT5 and PRMT9) symmetrically di-methylate arginine residues. The Type III enzyme (PRMT7) catalyzes only the mono-methylated arginine formation  and deubiquitinating enzymes modulate histone ubiquitination associated with genome stability, cell cycle, and transcription , lactylation (marked by p300), and serotonylation  are found in neurodevelopment and neurodisease.62Histone phosphorylation was occurred on serine, threonine, and tyrosine. Many kinases and phosphatases regulate histone phosphorylation, which is linked with chromatin condensation, DNA damage response, and transcription Table .59,60 Hi65Neurogenesis, the process by which NSCs differentiate into neurons, occurs throughout life in the embryonic and postnatal/adult brain. Early in embryonic neurogenesis, the neuroepithelial cells (NECs) in the ventricular zone and SVZ in the neural tube develop into radial glial cells (RGCs) with embryonic NSC properties. RGCs undergo symmetric stem cell divisions, expanding the pool. Moreover, NSCs progressively undergo asymmetric cell divisions, allowing self-renewal and the generation of committed daughter cells, such as nascent neurons or neuronal intermediate progenitor cells. Subsequently, the RGCs differentiate into ependymal cells and neurons that migrate to posterior layers along the radial filaments. In the late-stage of development, RGCs produce astrocytes and oligodendrocytes after the formation of the neuron. A small population of residual RGCs develops into adult NSCs responsible for adult neurogenesis Fig. .3,4,63–666 Quiescent radial glia-like NSCs (RGLs) can be activated to generate proliferating nonradical transit-amplifying cells ). These cells give rise to immature neurons. In adult SVZ, immature neurons migrate via the rostral migratory stream and develop into granule and periglomerular neurons in the olfactory bulb . These promote embryonic neurogenesis and inhibit astrocyte differentiation.69 In addition, histone acetylation by CBP is associated with postnatal neuroplasticity for adaptation to the environment. CBP-deficient mice showed a strong defect in environmental enrichment-induced neurogenesis in the hippocampus, along with reduced histone acetylation  at the promoters of environmental enrichment-regulated neurogenesis-related genes such as Lif, Neurog1, Dcx, Nes, and NpY.70Several HATs regulate neurogenesis Fig. . So far,Kat6b gene mutation have developmental defects in embryonic neurogenesis of the cerebral cortex.71 Another studies revealed that KAT6B is also involved in adult neurogenesis.72Kat6b gene is highly expressed in the neurogenic SVZ, and KAT6B-deficient mice show fewer NSCs and fewer migratory neuroblasts in the rostral migratory stream. Furthermore, NSCs/NPCs isolated from KAT6B-deficient mice showed defects in self-renewal capacity and the ability to differentiate into neurons.KAT6B , a histone acetyltransferase of the MYST family, is essential for neurogenesis. Mice carrying the Kat8, specifically in the cerebrum, showed cerebral hypoplasia in the neocortex and hippocampus. The study also reported that KAT8 variants in patients are associated with intellectual disability, seizures, autism, dysmorphisms, and other anomalies, suggesting a link between deficient H4K16 acetylation and intellectual disability.73A recent study reported that KAT8 , essential for H4K16ac, controls cerebral and NSC/NPC development during embryonic stages. Mutant mice lacking 75 HDACs are differentially expressed depending on the cell and tissue types.76 HDACs including HDAC1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 11 and SIRT1 and 6 are known to be enriched in the brain.79 Of these, HDAC1 and 2 are extensively studied during brain development. HDAC1 and HDAC2 have almost identical genomic organization and a redundant or specific role depending on the stages of brain development.81 Montgomery et al. generated mice lacking HDAC1 and HDAC2 in the CNS using GFAP-Cre, which is widely expressed in the CNS, including NSCs.81 Removal of HDAC1 or HDAC2 has no obvious effect on neuronal development, whereas the removal of HDAC1 and HDAC2 causes major abnormalities in the cortical, hippocampal, and cerebellar development. Additionally, neuronal precursors lacking HDAC1 and HDAC2 do not specifically differentiate into mature neurons and undergo cell death.81 Recently, Tang et al. revealed that HDAC1 and HDAC2 redundantly control the spatial positioning of intermediate progenitors (IPs) to form the SVZ in early cortical development.82 Developmental stage-specific depletion of both HDAC1 and HDAC2 in radial glial progenitors attenuated Neurog2 expression, resulting in the mispositioning of IPs on the ventricular surface. Although the mechanism underlying HDAC1/2-mediated gene activations needs to be further studied, these results demonstrated that HDAC1 and HDAC2 play an important role as redundant regulators of neuronal differentiation.In addition to HATs, HDACs are also key regulators in neurogenesis Figs. .74,75 HD83 To analyze the individual roles of HDAC1 and HDAC2 in neural development, Hagelkruys et al. expressed single alleles of Hdac1 or Hdac2 alleles in the absence of their paralog using Nestin-Cre transgene mice. It was observed that Nestin-Cre-mediated combined deletion of Hdac1 and Hdac2 leads to severely impaired brain development and embryonic lethality in agreement with a previous study81 using GFAP-Cre transgene. However, a single allele of Hdac2 but not of Hdac1 in the absence of its paralog prevents brain abnormalities and perinatal lethality. Furthermore, it showed that HDAC2, as a predominant regulator, is recruited to the Prckd gene and removes H3K9 acetylation, resulting in repression of Prckd expression.84 HDAC2 deletion might have different effects on neuronal development due to the different expression patterns of Nestin and GFAP within the NSC and progenitor populations. In addition, the differentiation of HDAC1-deficient mouse ESCs into neurons was repressed, resulting in the modulation of H3K9 acetylation on Sox2.85 These results propose that HDAC1 and HDAC2 may play specific roles in embryonic neuronal development.In contrast, HDAC1 and HDAC2 also showed distinct cell-type-specific expression patterns. For example, HDAC1 is highly expressed in NSCs/progenitors, but HDAC2 expression is weakly detected in neural progenitors and upregulated in neuroblasts and neurons.86 Furthermore, cerebrum-specific deletion of HDAC3 causes developmental defects in the neocortex and hippocampus and NSC/NPC depletion, indicating that HDAC3 plays an important role in embryonic neuronal development.87HDAC3, one of the class I HDACs, is also involved in neurogenesis. Conditional knockout of HDAC3 using the Nestin-Cre system showed major abnormalities in brain development.88 Instead, long-term synaptic plasticity and memory were impaired in HDAC4 cKO mice.89 These studies proposed that class II HDACs such as HDAC4 might exert their functions in the area of learning and memory.Unlike class I HDACs, the conditional deletion of Hdac4 in the CNS using the Thy1-Cre system and the Nestin-Cre system has no obvious defect in the brain architecture or neuronal viability.91 A recent study showed that HDAC1 is essential for neuronal differentiation of the adult hippocampus92, whereas HDAC2 is necessary for the complete differentiation and survival of adult-generated neurons.90 HDAC5 has also been implicated in adult neurogenesis.21 HDAC5 is known to interact with MEF2 and repress the MEF2 transcriptional activity involved in neurogenesis.95 Schneider et al. showed that isoxazole, a small neurogenic molecule, triggers a robust neuronal differentiation in adult NSCs via HDAC5 export, which de-represses MEF2-mediated gene expression.96In agreement with the differential role for class I and II HDACs in embryonic neurogenesis, these HDACs have engaged in adult neurogenesis. In SVZ and DG during adult neurogenesis, HDAC1 is highly expressed in NSCs, and its expression is low or undetected in intermediate progenitor cells and neuroblasts, whereas HDAC2 expression is high in neuroblasts.97 Another study showed that SIRT1 depletion promotes neuronal differentiation in N2A cells and significantly increases neuronal production in the adult SVZ and the hippocampus.99 These results indicate that SIRT1 functions as a negative regulator of embryonic and postnatal neurogenesis.99 In contrast, mice with heterozygous SIRT6 overexpression were used to study the involvement of SIRT6 in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. SIRT6 overexpression did not alter the NPC proliferation in vivo but increased the proportions of young neurons and decreased the proportions of mature neurons without affecting the glial differentiation. Furthermore, it was proposed that SIRT6 promotes the initiation of NPC differentiation toward a neuronal fate but limits the final maturation of these newly formed neurons.100The sirtuin family plays a vital role in determining the fate of neural progenitors. For example, SIRT1 is regulated by a redox state, which influences the fate of mouse embryonic neural progenitor cells. Under oxidative conditions, upregulated SIRT1 interacts with transcription factor HES1, downregulates H3K9ac, and subsequently downregulates pro-neuronal Mash1, resulting in the suppressed proliferation of NPCs and the differentiation of NPCs into the astroglial lineage. Conversely, knockdown of SIRT1 in NPCs induces upregulation of Mash1 and neurogenesis under oxidative conditions.Collectively, members of the HDAC family are differentially involved in both embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Although the direct roles of HDACs in regulating transcription are becoming apparent, an integrated function of HDACs in neurogenesis requires further studies.101 Lim et al. reported that MLL1 is essential for adult neurogenesis in SVZ.103 MLL1-deficient NSCs in SVZ rarely differentiate into neuronal cells, whereas they can proliferate and differentiate into glial lineages. Chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated that Dlx2, a key downstream regulator of SVZ neurogenesis, is a direct target of MLL1. In wild-type MLL1 cells, Dlx2 promoters have high levels of H3K4me3, which activates transcription. In MLL1-deficient SVZ cells, chromatin at Dlx2 is bivalently marked by H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, inhibiting Dlx2 expression. These data show that MLL1 functions as a cell fate determinant toward neurogenesis. SETD1A is adopted to the β-catenin promoter by histone cell cycle regulator (HIRA), a histone chaperone, and increases H3K4me3 levels, resulting in the induction of β-catenin expression in mouse embryonic NSCs. These facilitate neurogenesis of the neocortex.104 SETD5 deposits H3K36me3 required for RNA elongation and processing and, ultimately, for proper gene transcription. SETD5 inactivation causes hypo-methylation H3K36 and chromatin states unfavorable for elongation and splicing, altering NSC proliferation, synaptic transmission, and animal behavior.105Various HMTs are involved in the neurodevelopmental processes Figs. . MLL1 co106 The ablation of EZH2 using Pax7-Cre leads to a decrease in the global H3K27me3 level and transcriptional dysregulation in the embryonic cerebellum. Loss of EZH2 reduced the number of Purkinje cells and increased the number of cerebellar interneurons, and ultimately led to a hypoplastic cerebellum.107 EZH2 is also involved in cell proliferation and neuronal lineage specification of adult SVZ NSCs. Loss of EZH2 decreased SVZ NSC neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. EZH2 is directly recruited to Ink4a/Arf and Olig2 and mediates H3K27 methylation, repressing their expression. Repression of Ink4a/Arf or Olig2 is required for the proliferation of SVZ neurogenesis, respectively.108 Consistently, Zhang et al. also showed that EZH2 is essential for progenitor cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation in the SGZ of adult mice.109 Taken together, EZH2 is a critical epigenetic regulator in embryonic neurogenesis and adult neurogenesis in both SVZ and SGZ.During the cerebral cortex development, loss of EZH2, an H3K27 methyltransferase, altered the timing of neurogenesis and the relative numbers of different cell types. EZH2 deletion in early embryonic cortical neuronal progenitors induces premature neuronal differentiation, decreasing the number of neurons at birth.Sox9 and IAP, resulting in severe impairment of early neurogenesis. SETDB1 deficiency increased neurons in deep layers but decreased neurons in upper layers, suggesting that SETDB1 is required for proper neuronal composition and distribution in all six cortical layers. Furthermore, SETDB1 deficiency increased apoptosis and reduced the proliferation of NPCs isolated from the embryonic brain. These results indicate that SETDB1 as an epigenetic regulator is essential during early brain development.110 On the other hand, Suv39h1/2-mediated H3K9 methylation controls the differentiation of NPCs in the adult hippocampus. The number of H3K9me3 foci was significantly increased in NPCs compared to NSCs and then decreased in mature neurons. Pharmacological inhibition of Suv39h1/2 in adult hippocampal progenitors reduced neuronal differentiation while inducing proliferation. Furthermore, knockdown of Suv39h1/2 in adult mouse dentate gyrus impaired neurogenesis, indicating that Suv39h1/2-mediated H3K9me3 is important for adult hippocampal neurogenesis.111Some HMTs showed spatiotemporal expression during cortical neurogenesis, influencing cell fate and localization in different layers. For example, SETDB1 (ESET), a histone H3 Lys9 (H3K9) methyltransferase, is highly expressed during early mouse brain development but downregulated over time. During embryonic neurogenesis, SETDB1 deletion leads to reduced H3K9 trimethylation and dysregulation of gene expressions, such as 113 Franz et al. reported that DOT1L, a histone methyltransferase for H3K79me1/me2/me3, is critical for maintaining the progenitor pool and the proper distribution of deeper layer and upper-layer neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. DOT1L prevents premature differentiation by increasing the expression of genes that regulate asymmetric cell division. Loss of DOT1L caused a decrease in H3K9me2, resulting in decreased transcription of genes expressed in upper-layer neurons . Therefore, DOT1L methylation activity toward H3K79 affects the cell cycle and activates transcription related to upper-layer identity in early progenitors.113Recent studies revealed that H3K79 methylation during cortical development might contribute to a specific layer identity.114 In particular, promoter-associated H3R2me2a counteracted KMT2A-mediated H3K4me3, resulting in reducing the transcription of critical pluripotency genes. However, enhancer-associated H3R2me2a increases the differentiation-associated genes by inducing H3K4me1 (KMT2D) and H3K27ac (p300). That is, PRMT6 is essential for the differentiation and proliferation of NT2/D1 cells and neural precursor cells in the developing mouse cortex.In addition to histone methylation on lysine residues, histone methylation on arginine residues is involved in the regulation of neurogenesis. For example, asymmetric di-methylation of histone H3 at arginine 2 (H3R2me2a) is occurred in a PRMT6-dependent manner primarily at the promoter and enhancer sites of genes in the human embryonal carcinoma cell line NT2/D1.117 Fuentes et al. demonstrated that LSD1 as a component of the CoREST complex plays an important role in neuronal differentiation, migration, and morphology during mouse cortical development.116 LSD1-RCOR2 (CoREST2) are recruited at the promoter of the Dlx2 and Shh genes, which inhibit the Shh pathway in the developing neocortex, thereby inducing cortical neurogenesis.117 Another study showed that LSD1 mediates H3K4me2 demethylation on the HEYL promoter and blocks HEYL gene expression that inhibits human fetal NSC neuronal differentiation.119 In contrast to the repressive function of LSD1 on transcription, Zhang et al. showed that LSD1 increases atrophin1 expression by controlling the histone methylation status in the enhancer region, which is important for NPC maintenance.115 Zibetti et al. found that alternatively splicing an LSD1 transcript produces four full-length isoforms, and the expression of neuron-specific LSD1 isoforms is regulated during brain development and contributes to neurite morphogenesis during early cortical development.120 LSD1 + 8a, an isoform of LSD1, mediates H3K9me2 demethylation, but not H3K4me3 demethylation, along with supervillin (SVIL). The LSD1 + 8a/SVIL-containing complex plays a crucial role in the neuronal gene expression and neuronal differentiation in human neuroblastoma cells.121Like HMTs, several HDMs play key roles in the neurodevelopmental processes Figs. . As mentReln and removes H3K4me3, resulting in decreased Reln transcription. These results indicate that KDM5B reduces the neurogenesis of adult SVZ NSCs.122KDM5B catalyzes the removal of methyl groups on H3K4me3, which is primarily associated with transcriptional repression. KDM5B depletion reduces proliferation but promotes the migration of NSCs isolated from adult SVZ. Whole-genome expression screening showed that KDM5B depletion caused widespread transcriptional changes, including notably, the upregulation of the secreted extracellular matrix glycoprotein reelin (Reln). ChIP assays revealed that KDM5B is recruited to proximal promoter regions of 123 Iwase et al. reported that KDM5C inverts H3K4me3 to di- and mono- but not unmethylated products. Depletion studies in zebrafish and primary mammalian neurons demonstrated that KDM5C plays a role in neuronal survival and dendrite development.124 Several point mutations from XLMR patients reduce KDM5C demethylase activity and suppress neurite growth in Neuro2a cells. These results suggest that KDM5C is involved in neuron differentiation and the pathogenesis of XLMR.125KDM5C  is one of the most frequently mutated genes in X-linked mental retardation (XLMR).126 Furthermore, the KDM6B expression and its recruitment to the Dlx5 promoter are regulated in NSC differentiation in response to retinoic acid.127 KDM6B also induces neurogenesis from NSCs in adult SVZ. Park et al. showed that Kdm6b deletion targeted to SVZ NSCs in both developing and adult mice impairs neuronal differentiation. KDM6B regulates the neurogenic gene expression via interaction at not only promoter regions but also neurogenic enhancer elements. In KDM6B-deleted SVZ cells, H3K27me3 levels are increased at I1/2b, an enhancer regulating the expression of Dlx2, which leads to Dlx2 gene repression.128 Considering the previous finding that MLL1 deficiency in SVZ cells increases H3K27me3103, Park et al. studied a relationship between MLL1 and KDM6B in the regulation of Dlx2 expression. In differentiating SVZ cells, MLL1 was localized at both the I12b enhancer and promoter of Dlx2. In MLL1-deleted NSCs, KDM6B was not recruited at I12b, but, in KDM6B-deleted cells, MLL1 remained enriched at I12b. Together, these results suggest that MLL1-dependent localization of KDM6B at I12b is required for lifelong neurogenesis.KDM6B , an H3K27-specific demethylase, functions as a crucial activator of neurogenesis. KDM6B is required for neuronal commitment during the differentiation of embryonic stem cells into NSCs. KDM6B controls major regulators and markers of neurogenesis such as Nestin by regulating the dynamics of H3K27me3.129PHF2 is a member of the KDM7 family that demethylates H3K9me2. Recently, the PHF2 was discovered to play an essential role in NSC biology and early neurogenesis in the chicken neural tube. In mouse embryonic NSCs, PHF2 binds to cell cycle gene promoters and mediates H3K9me2 demethylation, which regulates cell cycle gene transcription. PHF2 depletion in chicken embryo spinal cords reduced early neurogenesis by controlling the progenitor proliferation.131 Histone lysine crotonylation (Kcr) activates gene expression and influences development and disease processes.134 Dai et al. showed that H3K9cr was significantly enriched at active promoters co-marked by H3K4me3 and H3K27ac in embryonic forebrain at E13.5. In particular, an increase in histone Kcr and a decrease in H3K27me3 were observed in the bivalent promoters . Elevated histone Kcr promotes NSC/NPC cell fate decision and accompanies embryonic neurogenesis.135In addition to histone acetylation and methylation, various histone modifications are associated with neurogenesis Fig. . Recent 137 Farrelly et al. revealed that transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) directly attaches serotonin to the glutamine residue at the fifth position of H3 (H3Q5ser). Although TGM2 serotonylated both H3K4me0- or H3K4me3-marked nucleosome, producing H3Q5ser or H3K4me3Q5ser, the dual mark  was only identified in brain. H3K4me3Q5ser was enriched in euchromatin and potentiated TFIID interactions with H3K4me3, which induced serotonergic neuronal differentiation.34Serotonin is not only a well-known neurotransmitter that modulates neuronal activity, but it can be also covalently bound to glutamine, called serotonylation.138 Deposited histone variants cooperate with histone-modifying enzymes to regulate gene expression. Recent studies showed that the association of histone variants with histone-modifying enzymes plays a key role in neurogenesis , a linker region, and a globular macro domain. It has two isoforms known as macroH2A1 and macroH2A2. While macroH2A is important for X-chromosome inactivation and autosomal gene silencing, macroH2A exerts both positive and negative effects on gene transcription in a context- and isoform-dependent manner.142 Similar to H2A.Z, macroH2A is thought to regulate gene expression by cooperating with transcriptional machineries.143 Ma et al. found that deletion of macroH2A1.2, one of macroH2A1 splice variants, enhanced NPC proliferation and reduced NPC differentiation, indicating that macroH2A1.2 is required for embryonic neurogenesis. MacroH2A1.2 physically associates with BRD4, thereby increasing H3K27ac levels and Nkx2.2 expression.144 Last, H2A.X differs from canonical H2A in that it has SQ[E/D]Φ motif (where Φ indicates a hydrophobic amino acid) in the C-terminus, which can be phosphorylated in response to DNA damage or cell cycle progression. Recent studies showed that H2A.X phosphorylation (γH2AX) was expressed in the mouse brain from embryonic life to senescence. γH2AX is observed during embryonic and adult neurogenesis and appears to be involved in neuronal proliferation and differentiation.146 The exact role of γH2AX during neurogenesis needs to be examined.In the histone H2A family, there are four major replacement H2A variants: H2A.Bbd, H2A.X, H2A.Z, and macroH2A. H2A.Z (60% identity with H2A) preferentially localizes at transcription start sites (TSSs) and regulates gene expression via the recruitment of various H2A.Z interactors.147H3.3 is the predominant form of histone H3 variants that differs by four to five amino acids from canonical histone H3. It was reported that H3.3 is required for embryonic NSCs proliferation. Furthermore, knockdown of H3.3 causes the abnormal neuronal development. H3.3 interacts with MOF, which increases H4K16ac levels in the Gli1 promoter and activates Gli1 expression.151 The main components of the CoREST complex are HDAC1/2, LSD1, CoREST1/2/3, ZNF217, and PHF21A. As mentioned, RCOR2 (CoREST2) plays a key role in neurogenesis during mouse brain development.117 Deletion of RCOR2 (CoREST2) results in the decrease of NPC proliferation, neuron population, neocortex thickness, and brain size. RCOR2 inhibits the Shh signaling pathway by recruiting the LSD1 complex and binding directly to the Dlx2 and Shh genes, resulting in H3K4me1 demethylation.117 Recently, the cortex-specific PHD finger protein PHF21B (plant-homeodomain finger protein 21B), originally known as a tumor suppressor152, was highly expressed in the neurogenic phase of cortical development and gradually decreased as the astrogliogenic phase started. PHF21B depletion in utero electroporation assay shows impaired neurogenesis. PHF21B recruits HDAC2 and LSD1 and causes loss of H3K4me1 and H3K27ac to the promoters of cell cycle genes, resulting in cell cycle exit during neurogenesis.153 The MiDAC complex, a histone deacetylase complex, consists of HDAC1/2, two scaffold proteins ELMSAN1  and DNTTIP1. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions of Dnttip1 and Elmsan1 in mESCs affect neuronal maturation and/or differentiation. MiDAC increases gene expression of pro-neural genes such as Slit3 and Ntn1 by removing the repressive H4K20ac on promoters and enhancers. In contrast, MiDAC reduces gene expression of negative regulators of neurogenesis, Spry4, and Id1 by reducing the active H3K27ac.154Most histone-modifying enzymes often function as a part of multiprotein complexes to regulate neurogenesis. There are three best-studied corepressor complexes as regulators of neurogenesis: CoREST (corepressor for element-1-silencing transcription factor), NuRD (nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation), and Sin3.155 Both the β-amyloid (Aβ) plaque deposition and neurofibrillary tangles associated with hyperphosphorylated tau proteins are specific features of AD. The Aβ peptide is the product of amyloid precursor protein (APP) cleavage by β-secretase (BACE1) and γ-secretase . Overproduction of Aβ causes it to self-assemble into oligomers and forms toxic Aβ plaques.156 Mutations in genes such as APP, presenilin (PSEN1), PSEN2, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) contribute to Aβ oligomer toxicity and Aβ peptide deposition, causing familial AD. The main component of the neurofibrillary tangles is an abnormally hyperphosphorylated and aggregated form of tau. Tau (MAPT), a microtubule-associated protein in axons, promotes assembly and stability of microtubules and vesicle transport. In AD, hyperphosphorylated tau is insoluble, lacks affinity for microtubules, and self-aggregates into structures of paired helical filament. Since cellular clearance systems begin to fail during aging, defective clearance of Aβ and tau leads to the accumulation of Aβ and tau aggregates in the AD brain. These Aβ plaque deposition and neurofibrillary tangles cause neurodegeneration and, in turn, synaptic injury and neurogenesis defects, contributing to cognitive dysfunction.159 Although genetic and environmental factors contribute to AD, the strong risk factor is aging, which alters the chromatin structure.161Alzheimer’s disease, a chronic neurodegenerative disease, is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly. AD was initially described by Dr. Alois Alzheimer in 1906.162 Histone acetyltransferase activity of CBP (KAT3A) is required for neurogenesis and memory consolidation in rodents.167 Several studies suggested that an increase in CBP expression is considered a valid therapeutic approach for AD. Conditional double-deletion mice lacking two presenilins (presenilin1 and 2) in the postnatal forebrain show impaired hippocampal memory and synaptic plasticity and subsequently develop synaptic, dendritic, and neuronal degeneration based on their age. Saura et al. showed that the deletion of presenilin1/2 reduced CBP levels, which decreased the transcription of CREB/CBP target genes such as c-fos and BDNF.168 A triple-transgenic model of AD (3xTg-AD) harboring three mutant genes  shows plaque and tangle pathologies, and synaptic dysfunction and impaired neurogenesis.170 CREB activation and phosphorylation are impaired in the 3xTg-AD mice. CBP gene transfer restores the CREB activity, which increases BDNF levels and improves learning and memory deficits in 3xTg-AD.171 Another AD model mice-harboring the familial AD-linked APPswe/PS1ΔE9 mutations reduced levels of phosphorylated CREB, and its cofactors CBP and p300.172 A recent study showed that the p300 acetyltransferase activity is increased in the hippocampal area of patients with AD.173 Transcriptomic analysis of the lateral temporal lobe of patients with AD against the young and elderly people without dementia revealed elevated levels of CBP/p300 and TRAPP (a component of the SAGA complex), which mediate the deposition of H3K27ac and H3K9ac in the disease-related genes.174 These discrepancies may be explained by methodological differences (human sample versus transgenic mice) or differential risk factors between humans and mice, but further study is needed to clarify these issues.Dysregulation of histone acetylation is related to memory decline and AD Fig. .162 Hist176 HDAC2, neither HDAC1 nor HDAC3, is increased by AD-related neurotoxic stimuli in vitro, in two models of neurodegeneration in mice and in patients with AD. HDAC2 binds to and reduces histone acetylation of genes important for learning and memory and suppresses their expression.177 Knockdown of upregulated HDAC2 increased H4K12ac, leading to de-repression of these genes.178 HDAC6, a class II member of the HDAC superfamily, interacts with tau, thereby increasing tau phosphorylation (depending on HDAC activity) and accumulation, and the protein level of HDAC6 in the AD brain is significantly increased compared with the normal brain.179 The reduction of endogenous HDAC6 levels rescues Aβ-induced impairment of mitochondrial trafficking and memory impairment in a mouse model for AD.180 Sirtuins such as SIRT1 and SIRT2 downregulate Aβ expression. Because the decreased levels of SIRT1 expression in AD lead to the loss of a protective role, they have become potential pharmacological targets to treat AD.183Since HDACs are involved in neurogenesis, brain function, and neurodegenerative diseases, they have become potential therapeutic targets for treating neurodegenerative diseases such as AD and PD.186 H3K4me3 methyltransferases such as MLL3 (KMT2C), MLL4 (KMT2D), SETD1A, and SETD1B were significantly elevated in patients with AD, compared to control subjects. In mutant tau transgenic mice, MLL1 (KMT2A) and SETD1B were significantly higher, compared with WT mice. Furthermore, H3K4me3 was significantly increased in the nuclear fraction of the prefrontal cortex lysates from patients with AD and human P301S tau transgenic mice (P301S tau mice), while no significant changes were found in the level of repressive H3K27me3 or enhancer H3K4me1. These results indicate that upregulation of H3K4 HMT results in the elevated level of H3K4me3 in patients with AD and in P301S tau mice.187 Repressive mark H3K9me2 and histone methyltransferases EHMT1 and EHMT2 were significantly elevated in the late-stage familial AD mouse model and in patients with AD. Specifically, H3K9me2 in glutamate receptor genes was increased in the prefrontal cortex of the aged familial AD mouse model, which was linked to reduced transcriptions. EHMT1/2 depletion causes decreased H3K9me2 and recovery of glutamate receptor expression and excitatory synaptic function in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.188Several HMTs were elevated in patients with AD Fig. .162,184–189 Mass spectrometry analysis using frontal cortex from human donors with AD showed that H2BK120 ubiquitination was increased in AD, but further studies will be needed.185In addition to histone acetylation and methylation, other histone modifications including ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and lactylation are associated with AD. BMI1, a component of PRC1 that promotes chromatin compaction and gene silencing through E3 ligase activity mediated by RING1A/B (H2AK119ub), is silenced in late-onset sporadic AD brain . Bmi1 knockout in human post-mitotic neurons induced amyloid-beta peptide secretion and deposition, p-Tau accumulation, and neurodegeneration. These results indicate that PRC1-mediated H2Aub is required for repressing MAPT transcription.190 Another study revealed that H3S10p was significantly increased in hippocampal neurons in AD. However, this phosphorylation is restricted to cytoplasm rather than nucleus, implying that the aberrant localization of H3S10p is associated with neuronal degeneration.191 In contrast, H3S57p and/or H3T58p were significantly decreased in a mouse model of rapid amyloid deposition (5XFAD) that produced high levels of Aβ. Decreased phosphorylation of these residues induce heterochromatin, leading to decreased gene expression.192 Myung et al. reported that H2A.X phosphorylation was increased in astrocyte of AD, suggesting that astrocytes have DNA damage associated with functional impairment.193Several studies showed that histone phosphorylation is related to AD. In frontal cortex from AD patients, H3 phosphorylation is globally increased.194 Pan et al. found that lactate levels are increased in hippocampus of 5XFAD mice. H4K12la levels were increased in Aβ plaque-adjacent microglia. Genome-wide analysis showed that H4K12la is enriched at the promoters of glycolytic genes  and activates transcription, thereby increasing glycolytic activity. This positive feedback loop triggers microglial-mediated neuroinflammation, resulting in exacerbating pathogenesis of AD.195Recent study revealed lysine lactylation (Kla) as a new type of histone mark. Glycolysis-derived lactate was used for Kla.185Recent next-generation sequencing technologies, such as ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and RNA-seq, have enabled researchers to study genome-wide chromatin dynamics and gene regulation. Numerous studies tried to characterize the relationship between histone modifications and genome-wide chromatin dynamics because AD is associated with dysregulation of histone acetylation and methylation Fig. .184,185196H3K9ac is associated with transcription activation and open chromatin. Recently, a genome-wide study was carried out on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 669 elderly human subjects using the H3K9ac mark and neuropathological examination to distinguish between amyloid-beta- and tau-related epigenomic changes. Unlike amyloid-β, tau tangles exert a broad effect on the epigenome, affecting 5990 of the 26,384 H3K9ac domains. Furthermore, the tau-related changes of H3K9ac are greater in open chromatin compartments than in closed chromatin compartments, indicating that tau leads to large-scale changes in histone acetylation and chromatin rearrangement.11 Nativio et al. compared the genome-wide enrichment of H4K16ac in the lateral temporal lobe of patients with AD with both age-matched and younger individuals without dementia to investigate crucial mechanisms for AD pathology. Normal aging is associated with a significant increase in the H4K16ac peaks. However, H4K16ac is reduced in patients with AD, suggesting that normal age-related changes in brain H4K16ac are altered in AD. Moreover, AD-associated H4K16ac peaks are implicated with AD-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quantitative trail loci detected specifically in AD studies. Alteration of H4K16ac in normal aging leads to the epigenetic landscape of AD.197H4K16ac, an active mark, is localized to both enhancers and promoters and is related to aging and DNA damage.198 The differential H3K27ac peaks among AD cases and controls were found with significant enrichment of hypoacetylated AD-associated peaks compared with hyperacetylated AD-associated peaks. Differential H3K27ac peaks are enriched in regulatory regions annotated to genes previously implicated in tau and amyloid neuropathology such as PSEN1, PSEN2, and MAPT, and in regions containing variants associated with late-onset sporadic AD.H3K27ac is a transcription activation mark. Marzi et al. performed ChIP-seq to quantify H3K27ac levels across the genome in postmortem entorhinal cortex samples from AD cases.174 First, previous RNA-seq data were analyzed, presenting the upregulation of the chromatin genes such as CBP, p300, and TRRAP (a subunit of the SAGA–ATAC complex) in the temporal lobe of AD brains as mentioned earlier. Proteomic analysis in comparing AD and old brains revealed changes in both histone methylation and acetylation. As histone methylation is increased or decreased, histone acetylation such as H3K27ac and H3K9ac is elevated in AD. Genome-wide analysis using ChIP-seq revealed AD-specific gains of H3K27ac and H3K9ac in genes that were associated with functional categories related to transcription and chromatin modification. In addition, using fly AD models, it was reported that an increase in H3K27ac and H3K9ac accelerates amyloid-β42 (Aβ42)-induced neurodegeneration in vivo. These results indicate that the H3K27ac and H3K9ac gains in AD dysregulate transcription and chromatin–gene feedback loops, affecting pathways associated with AD.Recently, considering the complexity of aging and neurodegeneration, Nativio et al. integrated transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenomic analyses of postmortem human brains  to identify epigenetic alterations associated with AD compared with older and younger controls.Sgk1, Egr1, Kcnk1, Ddit4, Per1, and Nfkbia. Administration of a specific Sgk1 inhibitor reduces a hyperphosphorylated tau protein, restores glutamatergic synaptic function, and ameliorates memory deficits in AD mice.187H3K4me3, a permissive histone mark, is abundant around TSSs. P301S tau mice, a model of AD-associated tauopathy, show significantly elevated levels of H3K4me3 in the prefrontal cortex. Integration analysis of H3K4me3 ChIP-seq and RNA-seq identified genes, which show upregulated expression and increased H3K4me3 occupancy. These genes include 188 H3K9me2 ChIP-seq revealed that the familial AD mouse model shows the genome-wide enhanced enrichment of H3K9me2 around the TSS across the genome. H3K9me2 enrichment around the TSS of Grin2a/NR2A and Grin2b/NR2B, glutamate receptor genes, is significantly increased in the familial AD mouse model, which is reversed by EHMT1/2 inhibition. These results demonstrate that reduced glutamate receptors expression in AD could be due to the dysregulation of H3K9me2. In contrast, a widespread loss of heterochromatin containing H3K9me2 and HP1 has been observed in the head of tau transgenic Drosophila and in motor neurons of tau transgenic mice and in the hippocampal neurons of patients with AD.199 In Drosophila tauopathy models, wild-type and mutated tau reduced H3K9me2, upregulating the expression of genes such as Nvd, Ir41a, and Ago3 that are normally silenced or expressed at low levels in fly. The RNAi-mediated reduction of Ago3 levels in tau transgenic Drosophila ameliorates the locomotor defects of tau transgenic Drosophila but does not affect transgenic tau or tau phosphorylation levels. These data indicate that tau-induced loss of heterochromatin is involved in neurodegeneration.H3K9me2 is associated with transcriptional repression. The global H3K9me2 and EHMT1/2 were upregulated in the prefrontal cortex in the late-stage familial AD mouse model and in patients with AD.200 They found that H3K9me3 is marked differentially and that the transcriptome is differentially regulated between AD and normal brains. Furthermore, H3K9me3-enriched genes inversely correlated with their mRNA expression levels in AD. H3K9me3‐landscaped genes in AD are associated with synaptic transmission, neuronal differentiation, and cell motility, which includes BDNF, GABBR1, GABBR2, and GPRASP1.H3K9me3, a repressive mark, is associated with heterochromatin. Lee et al. performed an integrated analysis of H3K9me3 ChIP‐seq and mRNA‐seq on cortex tissues from brain samples obtained from patients with AD and healthy subjects.201 Chromatin accessibility around the TSS regions of APP/PS1 mice was higher than those of WT mice, indicating that chromatin accessibility was altered in the APP/PS1 mice. Moreover, AD-increased chromatin-accessible regions contain binding motifs of numerous transcription factors, including Olig2, NeuroD1, TCF4, and NeuroG2. Several genes involved in AD development were found to have significantly higher chromatin accessibility and gene expression in APP/PS1 mice, including Sele, Clec7a, Cst7, and Ccr6. The transcription active marks, H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, are highly enriched in the promoter regions of these genes. These results suggest that alterations in chromatin accessibility related to the histone marks H3K4me3 and H3K27ac could be attributed to the enrichment of open chromatin regions with transcription factors motif, resulting in the upregulation of genes involved in AD pathogenesis.AD-associated chromatin accessibility was investigated via ATAC-seq in the APPswe/PS1dE9 (APP/PS1) mouse model.202 Motor symptoms of PD include tremor, postural instability, muscle stiffness, and bradykinesia. Nonmotor symptoms such as depression and cognitive impairments also occur in PD patients.203 PD is characterized by a loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and the accumulation of intracellular protein inclusions called Lewy body, composed of alpha-synuclein.204 Although the normal neuronal function of α-synuclein protein is not fully understood, it plays a role in synaptic vesicle dynamics, mitochondrial function, and intracellular trafficking. The neurotoxic accumulation and aggregation of α-synuclein can be triggered by relative overproduction of the protein, the presence of mutations that could increase its misfolding and oligomerization, and defects in the degradation of native or misfolded α-synuclein. Age-related deficiencies in proteolytic clearance mechanisms could play an important role in α-synuclein accumulation. Genetic abnormalities and environmental factors could promote these processes.207 Hereditary forms of PD only represent 10%–15% of all cases. The genes implicated in the onset of PD (PARK genes) currently comprise 20 genes including SNCA (encoding α-synuclein), LRRK2 , and VPS35 (encoding vacuolar protein sorting 35).209 In addition to genetic abnormalities, toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), paraquat, rotenone, and dieldrin caused the loss of dopaminergic neurons and increased the expression and aggregation of α-synuclein, which are also used to investigate PD pathogenesis.211Parkinson’s disease, the second most common neurodegenerative disease in the world, was first described by James Parkinson, a British physician in 1817.215 Dieldrin, a neurotoxin associated with PD, increased acetylation levels at H3 and H4 as well as HAT CBP protein levels.216 In addition, anacardic acid, one of the HAT inhibitors, reduced dieldrin-mediated dopaminergic neuron death.217 Rotenone decreased the SIRT1 level and promoted the p53 expression through increased H3K9 acetylation on the p53 gene promoter, which induced neuronal cells.218 Aberrant upregulation of histone acetylation at H2A, H3, and H4 and simultaneous reduction of multiple HDACs were observed in 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion (MPP+)-treated cells and MPTP-treated mouse brains as well as midbrain tissues from human PD patients. Garcinol, another HAT inhibitor, repressed, but several HDAC inhibitors such as MS-275 and TSA potentiate MPP+ induced cell death.219 These results suggest that PD-related environmental toxins cause increased histone acetylation through CBP upregulation or HDAC downregulation  and reduces PGC1 alpha expression, concomitantly with decreased histone acetylation.228 α-Synuclein reduces the p300 level and its HAT activity, which could reduce histone acetylation in the dopaminergic neuronal cell line.229Several studies show the role of α-synuclein in altering histone acetylation Fig. . α-Synucair Fig. . IncreasA30P) shows a reduced level of Tip60 and an increased level of HDAC2. Furthermore, the alteration of Tip60/HDAC2 binding patterns and histone acetylation reduction such as H4K16ac and H4K12ac in common Tip60 target neuroplasticity genes result in concomitant epigenetic repression of these genes  and SNAP25  by H3K9me1/2 deposition , which suppresses the expression of ion Fig. .186,233236 Although the underlying neurobiology of SZ still remains to be clarified, genetic factors and environmental factors play key roles in the etiology of SZ.238 In addition, a growing body of evidence suggested that epigenetic dysregulations of genes related to neurotransmission, neurodevelopment, and immune function are linked to SZ.239Schizophrenia (SZ) is a chronic and complex psychiatric disorder which affects ~1% of the global population. It is characterized by positive symptoms , negative symptoms , and cognitive impairment.GAD1, HTR2C, TOMM70A, and PPM1E) were reduced in prefrontal cortex (PFC) sample from SZ patient (postmortem human brain). Concomitantly, H3K9ac and H3K14ac levels in the promoter regions of those genes were decreased.240 Another study revealed that HDAC1 expression is increased in the PFC of SZ. Furthermore, GAD1(GAD67) expression is negatively correlated with the expression of HDAC1.241 These results suggested that histone acetylation reduction in neurotransmission-related genes have been mostly implicated in SZ  and serotonergic neurons are often associated with SZ. Tang et al. found that mRNA expressions of a set of schizophrenia-related genes  and H4 (H4K5acK8acK16ac). These results were confirmed in postmortem human brain of SZ cases. Mechanistically, BRD4 recognizes combinatorial H2A.Z acetylation, leading to aberrant expression of genes related to neurodevelopmental components of SZ. JQ1, BET bromodomain inhibitor, ameliorates transcriptional abnormality in SZ-derived neurons.GAD1 promoters. They also found that MLL1-mediated H3K4me3 is required for GAD1 expression.243 Recent genome-wide studies reported that genes involved in H3K4 methylation are associated with SZ, and that loss of function (LOF) mutations in SED1A is a substantial risk to SZ.247 Further studies identified that Setd1a+/− mice mimicking mutation of SZ patient or LOF display SZ-related phenotype.250 Mukai et al. found that SETD1A targets are highly expressed in pyramidal neurons. SETD1A is recruited by cortex-specific activators at enhancers while more generally expressed activators recruit SETD1A to promoters. MEF2 and SETD1A are co-localized at enhancer. Interestingly, promoter-bound SETD1A activates gene expression, but enhancer-associated setd1a inhibits MEF2 transactivity by methylating MEF2. Restoring SETD1A expression in adulthood rescues cognitive impairment in Setd1a deficient mice.251 These results suggested that MLL1 or SETD1A is a novel therapeutic target for SZ.Histone methylation and its modifying enzymes were differentially regulated in SZ Fig. . Huang eGLP, G9a, and SETDB1 mRNAs are increased in postmortem PFC from SZ subjects. Consequently, H3K9me2 levels are increased in SZ.252 Another study, on the other hand, showed that high levels of H3R17 methylation (active mark) are found in PFC of subject with SZ.253 Recently, Girdhar et al. profiled cell-type specific histone modifications from PFC with SZ. Interestingly, ChIP-seq using H3K4me3 and H3K27ac shows differential epigenome signatures between neuron and non-neuron: H3K27ac, large genome coverage (20%) in neuron chromatin versus 15–16% coverage in non-neuron chromatin. The extended H3K27ac coverage in neuron includes intron and intergenic region, suggesting that cell-type specific signatures at regulatory and disease-associated non-coding sequences play critical roles in SZ.254255 It is characterized by a wide spectrum of symptoms including depressed mood, disturbed sleep and appetite, diminished ability to think or concentrate, excessive guilt, and recurrent suicidal thoughts, which overlap with depressive symptoms in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.256 MDD is associated with multi brain regions including PFC, hippocampus, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens (NAc). These regions are connected structurally and functionally as a circuit . In many case, significant structural and functional alterations in these brain regions and circuit are involved in MDD.Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic and debilitating illness that affects approximately 6% of the global population each year.257 Additionally, environmental factors, such as prenatal factors, stress and drug abuse are associated with developing MDD. Recently, childhood events such as sexual, physical or emotional abuse have been reported to be strongly associated with the risk or the severity of MDD. On the other hand, protective environmental factors such as social and emotional supports and exercise can prevent MDD.256 Interestingly, recent studies have focused on epigenetic regulation by environmental factors of early life experiences, which may explain an individual difference in vulnerability and resilience to stress.258The heritability of MDD has been estimated at about 35% based on the family and twin-based studies.Hdac5 and Sirt2 mRNA expression in PFC of mice. This caused a decrease in H3 and H4 acetylation, resulting in CREB gene repression.259 Treatment with HDAC inhibitors and/or antidepressant drug  significantly elevated H4K12ac level at the Bdnf promoter in the PFC along with increased Bdnf expression.260 Additionally, the latest studies proposed that histone crotonylation play a key role in regulating stress-induced depression. Chronic social defeat stress lowers the level of histone crotonylation by upregulating chromodomain Y-like protein (CDYL), a crotonyl-Coenzyme A hydratase, in the PFC. Furthermore, gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies have shown that CDYL regulates stress-induced depressive behavior. Mechanistically, CDYL-EZH2 complex removes H3K27cr and adds H3K27me3 to the VGF promoter.134Alteration in histone acetylation under active  or passive  stress could contribute to the pathogenesis of MDD Fig. . PFC is 261 Chronic social defeat stress in mice causes a transient increase but followed by a persistent decrease in the H3K14ac levels in hippocampus. These changes were reversed by fluoxetine.262 In addition, chronic variable stress (CVS) mimicking certain symptoms of depression in human induced H4K12ac reduction in hippocampus subregions (CA3 and dentate gyrus) of CVS animals. Administration of Sirtinol, a class III sirtuin inhibitor, selectively increased H4K12ac in CVS-treated hippocampus. SirT1 deacetylase activity is increased in CVS.263Several studies showed the altered histone acetylation in the hippocampus under active stress. In hippocampus of chronic unpredictable stress-induced rat, H3K9ac and H4K12ac were reduced with increasing HDAC5 expression. HDAC5 inhibitor treatment relieved anxiety- and depression-like behaviors, showing that H3K9ac and H4K12ac levels were increased.264 Similarly, chronic social defeat stress decreased HDAC2 expression, which induced a transient decrease but a persistent increase in the H3K14ac levels in NAc.265 These results are opposite for PFC and hippocampus, suggesting that histone modification to chronic stress are differentially regulated according to brain regions. Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (Gdnf) is a growth factor for the survival and maintenance of the dopaminergic neurons. Uchida et al. found that Gdnf expression levels in NAc determines susceptibility and adaptation to chronic stress. Chronic ultra-mid stress enhanced HDAC2 expression, which decreases H3 acetylation at Gdnf promoter. The low expression of Gdnf is more susceptible to chronic stress, suggesting that epigenetic regulation of Gdnf contributes to behavior responses to chronic stress.266Recent studies have shown that histone acetylation is dysregulated in NAc associated with reward processing under active stress. Chronic social defeat stress decreases HDAC5 functions in NAc, leading to increased histone acetylation and gene activation of HDAC5 target genes.Bdnf expression, showing depression-like behavior. SIRT1 depletion in mouse model and neuron reversed depression behavior.267 On the other hand, Guan et al. showed that early life stress enhanced H3K9ac along with the decrease in HDAC1 and HDAC2 in the amygdala. The enhanced H3 acetylation may stimulate synaptic plasticity-related gene (PKMζ), resulting in anxiety-like behavior.268Recent studies reported that stress regulation of histone acetylation in amygdala, responsible for processing emotional information, is related to MDD. SIRT1 expression is increased under chronic unpredictable mild stress. This causes the decreased Bdnf promoter and a reduction of Bdnf expression in the PFC and hippocampus. G9a inhibitor relieved depression behavior with decreasing H3K9me2.270 Conversely, chronic social stress decreased G9a expression and H3K9me2 in NAc.271 These studies suggested that the differential levels of G9a-mediated H3K9me2 according to brain regions are associated with MDD. Recently, it is reported that acute stress-induced Suv39h2-mediated H3K9me3 enrichment at transposable element in hippocampus.272 In addition, chronic defeat stress increased H3K27me2 on Bdnf promoter in hippocampus, resulting in Bdnf downregulation. Imipramine treatment reduced H3K27me2 and conversely increased H3 acetylation along with HDAC5 downregulation.273Increasing evidence suggested that repressive histone methylation is increased under MDD Fig. . Post-trIn recent decades, many researchers have studied the underlying mechanisms that lead to neuronal development and disease. The processes of neurogenesis and neurodisease are influenced by various internal and external factors. During these processes, epigenetic marks, including histone variant exchange, histone modifications, and DNA methylation, are dynamically changed, thereby modulating the chromatin states. In this review, comprehensive information on the roles of histone modifications in neurogenesis and neurodisease is provided. Histone modifications such as acetylation and methylation are somewhat complex. These modifications are differentially implicated in neuron development and disease; some active or repressive marks globally increase or decrease, respectively, during these processes. In other cases, gene-specific changes in histone modifications modulate the expression of key genes related to neurogenesis and neurodisease. In addition, the spatiotemporal dynamics of histone modifications lead to the complexity of neurogenesis and neurodisease. Despite increased knowledge on these topics, many questions remain unclear regarding the mechanism of how these modifications regulate these processes. First, most of aforementioned neurodisease studies observed alteration of histone PTMs in postmortem subjects. Is alteration in histone PTM a driver or a passenger of neurological disease process? Second, various novel PTMs are identified. It would be interesting to investigate the role of new histone PTMs in neurogenesis and neurological disease. Third, extensive mechanistic studies are needed to determine which transcription factors  cooperate with histone-modifying enzymes or which reader proteins are recruited to modified histones. Last, brain bulk brain samples have been used for genome-wide studies. Because brain tissues are composed of various cell types, genome-wide approach in single cell level may provide us more precise information. Several new techniques including next-generation sequencing at a single cell level, gene editing, and 3D brain organoids provide promising clues that may help us decipher these challenges.283 To date, there are only a few ongoing clinical trials for evaluating neurodegenerative disease due to safety concerns of HDAC inhibitors. The development of more specific and selective HDAC inhibitors would overcome the concerns associated with HDAC inhibitors. Indeed, a comprehensive map of dynamic epigenetic changes during neurogenesis and degeneration will help to develop innovative therapeutics for neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders.Several HDAC inhibitors are preclinically evaluated for neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. HDAC inhibitors have profound therapeutic potential with neuroprotective, neurotrophic, and antidepressant-like properties


Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is regulated by the key transcription factor, Ime1. Recent developments have uncovered the role of non-coding RNA in the regulation of Ime1 and meiosis. In this review, we summarize the role of ncRNA-mediated and RNA homeostasis-based processes in the regulation of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Cells change their physiological state in response to environmental cues. In the absence of nutrients, unicellular fungi such as budding yeast exit mitotic proliferation and enter the meiotic cycle, leading to the production of haploid cells that are encased within spore walls. These cell state transitions are orchestrated in a developmentally coordinated manner. Execution of the meiotic cell cycle program in budding yeast,  Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoes meiosis and forms stress-resistant spores when grown in a non-fermentable carbon source in the absence of a nitrogen source as an adaptation to harsh environmental conditions. This type of response to nutrient deprivation is observed only in heterozygous MATa/MATα diploid cells and neither in haploid cells nor in MATa/MATa or MATα/MATα homozygous diploids [Schizosaccharomyces pombe responds to nutritional and cellular stress to initiate conjugation and meiosis .S. cerevisiae, two key loci control the event of sporulation: MAT, the mating-type locus, and RME, the regulator of meiosis [MAT a and MATα haploids and has multiple targets [MATa/MATα heterozygous diploids, transcription of the RME1 gene is itself repressed by the products of MATa and MATα, which form an a1-α2 repressor complex [IME1 and IME2 (IME for inducer of meiosis genes) [RME1-IME1 control of entry into meiosis was established and well-studied, the exact mechanism of repression by Rme1 was not clear for decades. The discovery of lncRNAs originating from the IME1 promoter led to the unraveling of a complex regulatory mechanism via non-coding RNA in the context of meiosis and is an important area of current research to understand the complexity of gene regulation in eukaryotes, especially their role in cell fate determination.In  meiosis . Rme1 is targets . In MATa complex . Rme1 was genes) ,7,8. Lats genes) ,10,11,12The eukaryotic genome encodes genetic information in the form of protein-coding genes essential for the survival of an organism and normal functioning. The RNA molecule plays a pivotal role in carrying information from DNA to protein synthesis in the central dogma of molecular biology. Early research limited the potential of RNA as only an information carrier and translator via mRNA, rRNA or tRNA, while DNA remained the focus of molecular biologists. Later, several RNAs that do not essentially code for any functional protein but possessing important regulatory functions came to the fore. It was found that a large percentage of the eukaryotic genome, previously addressed as ‘junk’, ‘dark matter’ or ‘transcriptional noise’, and transcriptionally inactive and non-coding, had important biological functions.Now it is well established that, apart from the protein-coding genes, transcription also takes place in the intergenic regions, giving rise to several types of non-coding transcripts ,14. In aS. cerevisiae. In general, mRNA quality control is regulated by the components of exosomes, usually associated with transcription-independent polyadenylation by the TRAMP complex. Cryptic Unstable Transcripts (CUTs) and Stable Unannotated Transcripts (SUTs) were detected/identified/discovered when exoribonuclease Rrp6, the catalytic component of the exosome complex, was deleted [xrn1Δ) lacking the cytoplasmic 5′-3′ RNA exonuclease revealed another class of non-coding RNA, the Xrn1-sensitive Unstable Transcripts (XUTs) [Loss-of-function mutations in the components of the RNA quality control machineries revealed the presence of several distinct classes of non-canonical non-coding RNA in  deleted ,20; SUTs deleted . Xrn1 mus (XUTs) . Similars (XUTs) . Severals (XUTs) ,25,26. WS. pombe and Naumovozyma castellii [Non-coding RNA are found across species, including viruses, prokaryotes, yeast, plants and animals ,29,30,31astellii ,33. The astellii . Importaastellii ,36,37.S. cerevisiae.Precise strand-specific sequencing studies have revealed the abundance of pervasive/antisense transcription in both budding and fission yeasts ,39,40,41Saccharomyces cerevisiae was first reported around 10 years ago [IRT1 (SUT 643), IRT2 (MUT1573), IME4-AS, etc., are currently associated with a role in regulating meiosis. The function of a large fraction of unannotated transcripts remains to be established.Evidence of non-coding RNA induced specifically during meiotic development in ears ago . It was ears ago ,46. Rrp6ears ago . Advanceears ago ,47,48,49IME1 that keeps Ime1 levels low in mitotically dividing cells. IME4, a regulator of IME1 expression, is required for diploids to undergo sporulation [IME4 codes for an mRNA methyl transferase that mediates methylation at N6-adenosine in several RNA species. This post-transcriptional modification is required for the downregulation of RME1 mRNA and subsequent expression of IME1 in diploids for undergoing meiosis [IME4 is an antagonist in activity to RME1 [IME4 is regulated by cell-type-specific antisense transcription [MATa/MATα heterozygous diploids transcribe the sense strand, haploids produce transcripts from the antisense strand, IME4-AS, also known as RME2. The ‘default’ expression of this transcript in haploids is a result of a strong promoter. In diploids, the a1-α2 complex originating from MAT loci represses the antisense strand, allowing the transcription of the sense transcript and thus IME4 expression, leading to transcriptional activation of IME1  initiates transcription of the ncRNA, which prevents the binding of transcriptional activators—for example, Pog1—to the IME1 promoter. While RNA polymerase is transcribing IRT1, Set1 and Set2 histone methyltransferases are recruited, which deposit methylation marks at H3K4 and H3K36, respectively. Set1-mediated dimethylation of H3K4 recruits the Set3C histone deacetylase complex, which contains two histone deacetylases, Hos2 and Hst1 [IME1 promoter, thereby repressing the expression. However, it appears that several strain backgrounds show some level of Rme1 expression despite the presence of the a1-α2 repressor complex in the heterozygous diploid [IRT1 in the diploids. To overcome this transcription, another lncRNA, termed IRT2, is transcribed from regions upstream of the IME1 promoter [IME1 induces the transcription of IRT2, which reduces the binding of Rme1 to its binding sites upstream of IRT1 and therefore a reduction in IRT1 transcript levels is seen  reported the role of lncRNA  of IME1 . In hapland Hst1 . Similarand Hst1 . These h diploid ,57. Thispromoter . In dipl is seen . This pr meiosis .IRT2 is also required for the transcription of IRT1 in haploid MATa and MATα cells. While IRT2 transcription in diploids results in compact nucleosome assembly at Rme1 binding sites and hence reduced transcription of IRT1, in haploid cell types, basal-level IRT2 transcription activates IRT1 transcription. It was recently shown that IRT2 transcription recruits Rtt109 histone acetyl transferase, which incorporates a H3K56 acetylation mark on the newly synthesized histones at the IRT2 locus [IRT1 transcription.Interestingly, T2 locus . The H3KT2 locus —in this SUT367 was identified in a screen for finding functions of non-coding RNA from a deletion library and it was found that deletion of the essential ncRNA SUT367 leads to overexpression of the adjacent gene RPL3, encoding a ribosomal protein, and this prevents spores from germinating post-meiosis [Several studies report the importance of the non-coding transcriptome for a successful meiosis to occur. However, their functions and the molecular mechanisms by which they act are largely unexplored. For example, -meiosis . HoweverSchizosaccharomyces pombe [S. cerevisiae. In both budding and fission yeasts, a subset of meiosis-specific genes are constitutively expressed during mitotic growth. However, these genes, in the case of fission yeast, are largely under the control of an RNA-binding protein, Mmi1, which binds a conserved region, the Determinant of Selective Removal sequence (DSR), in these transcripts [meiRNA, a lncRNA from the sme2+ locus. Mmi1, along with an RNA-binding protein, Mei2, and lncRNA meiRNA forms a nuclear dot referred to as the Mei2 dot at the sme2+ locus [mamRNA, regulates the mutual control of Mei2 and Mmi1 for efficient switching to meiosis. During mitosis, mamRNA binding to Mmi1 enables Mmi1 to target Mei2 for degradation via Ccr4-Not-mediated ubiquitination. Conversely, during meiosis, accumulating Mei2 associates with mamRNA and inactivates Mmi1 to inhibit the degradation of meiotic mRNA, thus positively regulating meiosis [S. pombe, mei4, encoding a master regulator of meiosis and sexual differentiation, is silenced during vegetative growth by recruitment of the RNA interference complex, the RNA-Induced Transcriptional Silencing complex (RITS). Interestingly, the recruitment of the RITS complex is via the RNA-binding protein Mmi1 associated with the DSR region of the meiotic transcripts [mei4 is lost, leading to its active expression.All these mechanisms indicate the importance of the non-coding transcriptome during essential biological processes such as meiosis. The fine-tuning of various players involved in meiosis is a pre-requisite for successful meiosis to occur. The regulation and mechanisms involved in the turnover of meiosis-specific coding and non-coding transcripts are relatively well understood in fission yeast, es pombe ,63,64,65nscripts ,52,66,67nscripts . This hynscripts ,67. Upon2+ locus . Another meiosis ,69. Simi meiosis ,70. In Snscripts . Rrp6, Rnscripts ,72. UponS. pombe, one of the targets of Mmi1, the lncRNA nam1, is not only targeted for degradation by Mmi1, but transcription is also efficiently terminated by it during vegetative growth. This co-transcriptional termination of nam1 is essential for the expression of a downstream gene, byr2+, that plays a key role in the control of sexual differentiation [nam1-1 mutant defective in binding Mmi1, transcription readthrough of nam1 into the adjacent locus coding for byr2 suppresses byr2 expression and leads to defective sporulation [meiRNA-deleted cells. On the other hand, in budding yeast, mutants of transcription termination factor Rtt103 and Rai1 are also defective in the formation of spores [S. pombe, downregulates the expression of meiosis-specific genes during vegetative growth and mutants also show defective sporulation, again hinting at a potentially conserved function for such RNA processing factors in regulating the meiotic transcriptome [In addition, transcription termination and RNA 3′ end processing are also reported to regulate the differential expression of meiotic mRNA during mitosis and meiosis. In ntiation . In the rulation . Interesrulation ,74. Lossf spores ,76. Whilf spores . It leadcriptome ,78.S. cerevisiae [S. cerevisiae. It is likely that RNA processing and termination factors might be predominant modes of regulating meiotic non-coding RNA in S. cerevisiae in the absence of RNAi and DSR-Mmi1-dependent regulatory processes.Reports suggest that non-coding RNA are usually the targets of the nuclear exosome, Xrn1-dependent cytoplasmic 5′-3′ degradation and non-sense-mediated decay in revisiae ,22,79,80Cell fate determination is a complex process regulated by multiple interconnected pathways. The diverse mechanisms, ranging from regulation by transcription factors at the promoters and chromatin remodeling at the meiotic genes, to regulation by pervasive non-coding RNA and RNA processing, showcase the importance of the stringent control that is required to determine cell fate decisions. Studying the mechanisms involved in cell fate determination will reveal layers of complex regulation in essential biological pathways that are only now being understood by the research community. Single-cell organisms with simple fates and reduced complexity provide ideal models to investigate the various molecular mechanisms that contribute to this process.