Social Movements as Catalysts for Policy Change: The Case of Smoking and Guns
Constance A. Nathanson
J Health Polit Policy Law (1999) 24 (3): 421-488.
Constance A. Nathanson; Social Movements as Catalysts for Policy Change: The Case of Smoking and Guns. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1999; 24 (3): 421–488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-24-3-421
Social movements organized around perceived threats to health play an important role in American life as advocates for change in health policies and health behaviors. This article employs a framework drawn from social movement and related sociological theories to compare two such movements: the smoking/tobacco control movement and the gun control movement. A major purpose of the article is to identify specific social movement ideologies and actions that are more or less likely to facilitate achievement of the movement's health policy objectives. The article concludes that the success of health-related social movements is associated with (1) the articulation of a socially (as well as scientifically) credible threat to the public's health, (2) the ability to mobilize a diverse organizational constituency, and (3) the convergence of political opportunities with target vulnerabilities.
Copyright © 1999 by Duke University Press
Motivation, Mobilization, and Monitoring: The Role of Groups in Health Policy
Web Of Science (100)
Calvin's Problem: Racial Identity and Gun Ownership
"The Justice of a Rule That Forbids the Men Smoking on Their Jobs": Workers, Managers, and Cigarettes in World War II America
Common Sense or Gun Control? Political Communication and News Media Framing of Firearm Sale Background Checks After Newtown
The Murder of Michael Brown: Reading the Ferguson Grand Jury Transcript
Black Power Catalyst for Feminism
Popular Nationalism The Insurrectionary Catalyst
The Caribbean Crisis Catalyst for Soviet Projection in Latin America
Afro/Asian Arts Catalysts, Collaborations, and the Coltrane Aesthetic