Accessibility statement for Leeds Arts University Repository
This website is run by GuildHE, and content is populated by Leeds Arts University. We want as many people as possible to be able to use this website. For example, that means you should be able to:
change colours, contrast levels and fonts
How accessible this website is
We know some parts of Leeds Arts University Repository are not fully accessible:
most older PDF documents are not fully accessible to screen reader software
some images (including linked images) do not have alternative text descriptions
some form controls do not have an associated label
More details about areas of Leeds Arts University Repository that are not fully accessible can be found below in the 'Non compliance with the accessibility regulations' section of this statement.
What to do if you cannot access parts of this website
Wherever possible, users should send requests by email to accessibility@leeds-art.ac.uk. The Compliance Officer will be in touch within 5 working days to discuss individual user needs and to go over the options available. Where this is not possible, please use the phone number listed below to call.
We're always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we're not meeting accessibility requirements, contact The Compliance Officer: accessibility@leeds-art.ac.uk.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the 'accessibility regulations'). If you're not happy with how we respond to your complaint, contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS).
Contacting us by phone
Whilst we do not currently provide a text relay service, please contact us using the email address above and we will discuss available options with each user on a case by case basis.
Otherwise information about contacting the team can be found above.
Leeds Arts University is committed to making its website accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.
This website is not compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 AA standard. The non-accessible sections are listed below.
Non accessible content
Non compliance with the accessibility regulations
Some images, including linked images, do not have any alternative texts associated with them.
Some form controls do not have associated names.
The contrast in some parts of the website is very low.
Some tables do not have headers for columns or rows.
Some pages contain several links to the same source.
Some pages contain layout tables, which may be diffiult to navigate with screen readers.
The title attribute value (advisory information that appears when user hovers over an element) is the same as the title text in some instances.
The text of some links may not make sense out of context or may contain extraneous text.
Some pages contain javascript jump menus, which may make navigating the website by keyboard difficult.
These issues will be resolved in a planned upgrade to this repository.
None of the issues listed above present a disproportionate burden to fix. They will all be resolved as part of a planned upgrade.
Content that's not within the scope of the accessibility regulations
PDFs and other documents
As Leeds Arts University Repository is an open access research repository, the principal content made available to users are research outputs such as articles, papers, posters and reports, many of which are PDF documents. Many PDF documents, especially older ones, are not fully accessible to screen reader software and do not contain other common accessibility features. In particular:
many documents, especially older ones, do not conform to the PDF/A archiving format.
many lack bookmarks or document titles, therefore failing to meet WCAG 2.1 success criteria 2.4.5 and 2.4.2.
many discuss scientific or scholarly concepts which may be abbreviated with no mechanism for discovering the meaning of the abbreviations, or unusual words arising from scholarly discourse without definitions. These issues each fail WCAG 2.1 criteria 3.1.4 and 3.1.1 respectively.
there may be some documents that fail to specify their human language, thereby failing WCAG 2.1 success criterion 3.1.1.
many documents may not reflow satisfactorily. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.4.10.
What we're doing to improve accessibility
Our Accessibility Roadmap shows how and when we plan to improve accessibility on this website.
Preparation of this accessibility statement
This statement was prepared on 26/08/2020. It was last updated on 10/11/2020.
This website was last tested on 10/11/2020 The test was carried out by CoSector, University of London.
We used this method to decide on a sample of pages to test.