Will the SFMTA Gut Muni Improvements to Prop Up the Central Subway?
Central Subway construction on Stockon Street at the site of the planned Union Square Station. Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/xpressmagazine/6483705089/in/set-72157628350968779/##SFSU Xpress Magazine via Flickr##
The Central Subway's latest funding troubles with Congress have brought some burning questions to the surface: How far will the SFMTA go to prop up the project, and what will the price be for Muni riders?
The U.S. House of Representatives approved an amendment to an annual appropriations bill last week that would block $850 million in federal funds for the project. The amendment could be stripped in conference with the Senate, but as the Bay Citizen revealed, SFMTA management is concerned that Congress may not deliver the $942 million — the majority of the project's funding — in a timely manner (assuming it comes through at all). The SFMTA had expected the funds to be approved in December 2011. If the agency doesn't get the funds by September, according to the Bay Citizen, it will waste $4 million in staffing costs every month until it does.
When asked what the SFMTA's backup plan is, agency spokesperson Kristen Holland didn't provide one, stating only that the funding probably won't be blocked because the "amendment is not in the Senate version and should be eliminated in conference."
"The bottom line is that this project will improve transit for the city, region and state and has been vetted by every level of government and given high marks every step of the way," Holland told Streetsblog.
But the project's cost has already risen from the original estimate of $995 million (in 2011 dollars) to $1.6 billion, according to the SFMTA's Central Subway blog. Tom Radulovich, executive director of Livable City, said he's worried the SFMTA may take funds from Muni's existing service, its abysmally neglected maintenance department, or needed improvements like the Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP), which he says should be a higher priority than the Central Subway.
Though the SFMTA insists that the Central Subway won't take funds away from other projects, Radulovich said the agency has already been digging into discretionary funds — the money that could be used for any project. "That's part of their funding plan," he said. "The trajectory this project is on is to take more and more and more funding from the necessary and essential improvements to Muni."
The TEP is expected to yield major savings in operating costs and travel times on 16 Muni routes, comprising a "Rapid Network," for far more riders than the Central Subway at an estimated one-tenth of the cost. But most of the TEP's funding is unsecured, and if the Central Subway sucks up the funding it needs, the TEP may not meet its target for completion in 2017.
Proposals for eight TEP routes were shopped to the public this spring, including the clogged Stockton Street corridor, which the Central Subway is intended to serve. Although Streetsblog reported in January that the SFMTA wasn't planning to improve surface transit along Stockton, even as bus riders are detoured around the construction for years, the agency later announced that the street would be included as one of the TEP's first eight routes. However, it wouldn't undergo the kind of fundamental changes needed to substantially prioritize bus service on the corridor, like providing two-way bus access throughout Stockton and Fourth Street or restricting car access in the Stockton tunnel.
Radulovich said he also worries that cost-cutting on the Central Subway could make the project worse than it already is. It is one of the most divisive projects among transit advocates, long criticized as a politically-motivated boondoggle with ballooning costs, poor connectivity to other transit routes, minimal benefits for travel time, and low impacts on ridership. Most recently, new protests have come out of North Beach, which won't get a subway station but will endure the subway's construction impacts. Save Muni, perhaps the group most committed to opposing the project, also filed a new lawsuit claiming the planned Union Square Station violates the City Charter.
"If there is a delay, I hope MTA uses the time for a rethink of the project," said Radulovich. "I think there is a Central Subway project that makes sense for San Francisco. It's not the Central Subway project they're building."
Filed Under: Central Subway, House of Representatives, Muni, Muni Forward, SFMTA, Transit, Transit Advocacy, U.S. Senate
As Central Subway Funding Deadline Looms, Chinatown Rallies Support
By Matthew Roth	| Nov 17, 2010
Much has been made over the past two days about the funding gap the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) needs to make up by spring of 2011 to complete the Central Subway, the result of an article in the Chronicle and a small dust up between the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) Executive […]
SFMTA Reaches Tentative Labor Agreement with Muni Operators Union
By Aaron Bialick	| May 31, 2011
The SF Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) says it will save at least $21.3 million in labor costs over three years after reaching a tentative contract agreement with the union representing Muni operators, SFMTA spokesperson Charles Goodyear announced today. The new tentative agreement includes terms that would freeze Muni operator pay, allow the SFMTA to hire part-time […]
Guest Commentary: Central Subway Problems Bode Badly for Future of SF Transit
By Gerald Cauthen	| Jan 8, 2018
The Central Subway subway is years behind schedule--and nobody should be surprised about that, given management blunders, says guest commentator Gerald Cauthen.
Supes Vote Next Week on Wiener's Backup Transportation Funding Measure
By Aaron Bialick	| Jul 16, 2014
Supervisors are expected to vote next week on Supervisor Scott Wiener's backup plan for transportation funding — a charter amendment that, with voter approval, would increase the share of the city's general fund that gets allocated to Muni, pedestrian safety, and bike infrastructure. That share would be tied to the city's growing population. Wiener introduced […]
Central Subway Pagoda Deal Will Take $9 Million From Muni Operating Funds
By Aaron Bialick	| Feb 20, 2013
Updated 2/23 A deal struck by the SF Municipal Transportation Agency to extract tunnel drills at the site of the abandoned Pagoda Theatre will cost the agency an estimated $9.15 million. While the lease deal with building owner Joel Campos allows the SFMTA to move forward with an extraction plan that's less disruptive to the […]
By Lisa Ratner	| Apr 18, 2013
Private Parking Spot Going for $80,000 — Why Is Street Parking Free, Again? (Huffington Post) SF Examiner: SFMTA Must Use Prop A Funds Appropriately Before Asking Voters for New Revenue Rec and Parks Poised to Buy Parking Lot to Turn Into Park on 24th St. in Noe Valley (SF Examiner) SFGate's C.W. Nevius Gets a Cabbie's View On […]