Buffalo's ISIS Supporting Terrorist and Its Klan Supporting Terrorist
August 7, 2015 /7 Comments/in Terrorism /by emptywheel
Michael O'Neill
On January 21, 2015, the Niagara County Sheriff's office responded to a report of an explosion at the house of Chair of the Niagara County Legislature, William Ross. They discovered that his step-son, former corrections officer Michael O'Neill, who lived with his mother and step-father at the house, had blown off his leg while working with explosives in the garage. In addition to the one that exploded, there were 6 completed Improvised Explosive Devices in the garage, along with shrapnel, fireworks powder, and other explosives precursors.
The complaint made no mention of any evidence beyond the explosives precursors.
O'Neill was brought to a local hospital where he had his leg amputated.
When an ATF and Sheriff's investigator interviewed O'Neill at the hospital, he claimed he had been making the bombs to blow up tree stumps.
Arafat Nagi
A week later, on July 29, also in the Buffalo area, FBI Agent Amanda Pike arrested US citizen Lackawanna resident Arafat Nagi on charges of attempting to materially support ISIS. The complaint laying out the case against Nagi relied on trips to Turkey and Yemen (Nagi has family in the latter), a slew of tweets supporting ISIS, and some 2012 and 2013 purchases of military equipment — including body armor and a machete — and Islamic flags from eBay. The complaint also included pictures Nagi had tweeted out depicting ISIS and extremist flags and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
The most recent event cited in the complaint was a February 28, 2015 conversation (apparently not taped) between Nagi and an associate who — given the redaction of a descriptive footnote — almost certainly either has a criminal record or is working off some arrest, in which Nagi said he'd use insurance money to travel to Syria. The associate — not Nagi — raised meeting with al-Baghdadi (presumed to be Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).
In spite of the silence about any precipitating event that led to Nagi's arrest in July, the US Attorney for Western New York (and the husband of Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul), William Hochul, had a press conference to announce Nagi's arrest. Both court documents and public reporting indicated that the Muslim community had tipped authorities off to Nagi's increasing belligerence in support of radical views.
On July 27, Magistrate Hugh Scott had a hearing on O'Neill's custody. In spite of the government's request, Scott did not place O'Neill in US Marshal custody right away, in part so his mother could visit him more easily.
On July 30, Magistrate Scott again deferred his decision on custody to receive briefing.
On July 31, Nagi had his arraignment before the same judge, Magistrate Hugh Scott. Scott ordered Nagi, whose last incriminating act was in February, held without bail, citing the seriousness of his alleged crime and past (2013) violence. Scott further cited, "the volume and nature of the social media usage [that] indicate that Nagi has formed a strong intent to join and to support ISIL and was looking for opportunities to do so."
On August 5, Scott held a third hearing on O'Neill's detention. O'Neill's attorney argued that his 7 IEDs did not constitute bombs at all (remember, he said he was going to attack tree stumps with them). The government said they were, pointing to the shrapnel in one of the constructed bombs. The judge agreed, noting "there is no non-malevolent explanation for why that explosive powder needed to contain or to be associated with nails and other shrapnel." Unlike in Nagi's detention consideration, Scott did not mention his prior violence, such as the bar fight a year ago that was precipitated when O'Neill used a racial slur in response to a request for a lighter.
If I'm reading the docket correctly, after a recess in this Wednesday hearing, Scott issued his written opinion. Only then did the parties proffer new evidence. His defense shows that a number of DWUI charges (one of which resulted in him losing his gun permit in 2010,which in turn referenced earlier alcohol issues recorded by his work, presumably, the corrections facility where he used to work) had been resolved with no jail time.
But only then — after the judge had already decided to hold O'Neill because he put BBs and nails in his IEDs — did the government introduce this evidence, evidence that had to have been apparent (and probably was collected) when the ATF and Sheriff's investigator did their initial investigation of what O'Neill had been doing in the garage owned by the Chair of the County Legislature.
That evidence shows that the work bench at which Ross' step-son was emptying fireworks for powder and adding nails to IEDs was decorated with a Stormtrooper poster, a picture of Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Confederate flag, and a poster advertising, "The KKK wants you." O'Neill also appears to have had a sword (most visible in Exhibit 14) not mentioned in any legal document.
I don't fault Scott that he didn't mention the evidence that O'Neill was constructing bombs amid a bunch of white supremacist propaganda — he hadn't been shown it or apparently even informed of it until he issued his opinion. But I find it notable that the prosecutors — and Hochul, who held a press conference upon the arrest of a guy who hadn't done anything incriminating (at least according to the complaint) since February — didn't mention this until this stage of the proceedings. And while Hochul commented publicly to the press, I don't believe he had a formal press conference to highlight the guy making 7 bombs in his step-dad's garage did so under the glare of the first Klan Grand Wizard.
O'Neill's politically connected step-father, in whose garage he was assembling bombs right below Nazi and Klan paraphernalia, said "he didn't know what O'Neill was doing and if he did, he would have alerted authorities," which appears to make him far less attentive than the Muslims who reported Nagi's belligerence. Judge Scott expressed some skepticism that Ross could miss both the explosives construction and the Nazi propaganda in clear view in his garage.
The US Attorney's office says it is investigating O'Neill's devices to see if they can determine where he learned to build the IEDs and whether they can determine precisely what "stumps" he had in mind for a target. Notably, these IEDs are probably powerful enough the government could charge O'Neill with possession of WMD, which carries a terrorist enhancement, if they discover he had plans of using those IEDs to terrorize.
Nagi and O'Neill
Since Nagi's arrest, a number of commentators — including this post and a paragraph of this excellent Ryan Reilly piece — place this case among those where someone is accused of terrorism exclusively for speech. The bulk of the evidence in this case, aside from two trips to Turkey during which Nagi didn't join ISIS, amounts to speech, albeit clearly hateful speech.
We don't yet know whether O'Neill has engaged in similar public hate speech (aside from the racist comment last summer that seems to have gotten him hospitalized); what has been mentioned so far is dead tree propaganda, nothing that would reflect interaction with others (his neighbors, at least, had no idea what he was doing in the garage at all hours of the night). Moreover, there is the added (inexcusable but predictable) factor that this guy was the step-son of a politically connected guy, which would lead prosecutors to exercise some caution about crying terrorism without a good deal of evidence.
Still, these two extremists were working their way through the same court room at the same time. The contrast between the two cases is instructive.
Tags: Arafat Nagi, Kathy Hochul, Michael O'Neill, William Hochul
https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.png 0 0 emptywheel https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.png emptywheel2015-08-07 17:38:002015-08-08 08:38:58Buffalo's ISIS Supporting Terrorist and Its Klan Supporting Terrorist
Good exposition, thank you, of the effects of (potential) prosecutorial discretion. Ilya Somin has an interesting article today on how jury nullification contrasts with prosecutorial discretion. If the latter is acceptable, then why not the former?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/07/rethinking-jury-nullification/
And he goes on to say this: "It is worth noting that Reynolds' column was partly inspired by a recent case where a jury nullification advocate was charged with jury tampering for handing out pro-nullification leaflets outside a courthouse. For reasons that co-blogger Eugene Volokh explains here, such prosecutions likely violate the First Amendment." I wonder if a Muslim were to do such an act outside the courthouse where Nagi was being tried, could the Muslim be charged with material support for terrorism? Slippery slope, for sure.
orionATL says:
what's missing from the o'neill narrative are his targets.
i consider it highly unlikely there was no evidence of targets available to the sheriff, state police, or fbi. you don't get this far along the terrorism trail without having specific targets in mind. black targets no doubt. but in buffalo? elsewhere in new york ? or after a jog down an interstate?
as for step-dad and buffalo politico william ross,
"..O'Neill's politically connected step-father, in whose garage he was assembling bombs right below Nazi and Klan paraphernalia, said "he didn't know what O'Neill was doing and if he did, he would have alerted authorities…"
i never go into my garage, he added when questioned further, for fear of learning what my step-son is up to.
also missing – other individuals with whom o'neill communicated or associated regarding his "work" or intent. it's unlikely he kept that to himself.
emptywheel says:
Incidentally, he's not running for reelex. I have wondered whether it's bc his son is (now was) a ticking time bomb.
TomL says:
Prosecution and judicial mentality is a study all by itself. Many, if not most, judges are former prosecutors, so it is not surprising that they think like prosecutors. While working for the Federal Defender's office in 2005-2006, I observed that the U. S. Attorney made heroic efforts to shoehorn what would have previously been normal criminal cases into terrorist prosecutions. (The prosecutors must have been awarded gold stars for a terrorist conviction). We saw many garden-variety, low level cases become terrorist cases on the basis of a single phrase uttered by the friend of the defendant. The pre-Booker sentencing guideline penalties were so severe that the defendants almost always pleaded guilty to a lesser charge, just to avoid the terrorist enhancement.
Judges went along with the terrorist scare, undoubtedly prompted by pressure from above and by the usual fear of blowback if they released a defendant with a middleastern name that subsequently commits a terrorist act. Prosecutors entertain similar fears and thus feel compelled to demonize the accused and seek the most draconion pretrial treatment and sentencing.
That the danger from terrorism in the U. S. is de minimusseems to have little effect upon pretrial and sentencing practices established as though terrorists have been arriving on our shores by the boatload.
Americans require a devil; they can dispense with God.
thanks for this very instructive comment from closeup.
galljdaj says:
Pizza stores, firecracker sales, and how many others… ?
dude on The Cohen Material Just Released By The Court
AndTheSlithyToves on The More Puzzling Inaction in SDNY: National Enquirer
Worried on The Cohen Material Just Released By The Court
emptywheel@emptywheelRT @joshgerstein: After completing his testimony at trial of Flynn biz partner Bijan Kian on foreign-agent charges, lobbyist @JimCourtovich…1 hour ago19 July 2019
bmaz@bmazTrump goes for staged bigotry chants and rallies, @IlhanMN receives granular and spontaneous support from American… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…4 hours ago19 July 2019
RayneToday@raynetodayRT @SonjaHutson: #BREAKING: SF Superior Court Judge East rules that the search warrant for journalist Bryan Carmody's phone records should…4 hours ago19 July 2019
bmaz@bmazHere is Awful Announcing dishonestly propagating more clickbait bullshit acting like their "Pence" is the Vice-Pres… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…5 hours ago18 July 2019
Mankiw's Principles of Economics Part 6: Markets Are Usually A Good Way to... Mankiw's Principles of Economics Part 7: Governments Can Sometimes Improve...