Posts Tagged 'Republicans'
Newt's In
Posted: May 11, 2011 in 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries
Tags: 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries, Newt Gingrich, Republicans
Newt Gingrich threw his hat into the 2012 race this afternoon, making the announcement via Twitter and YouTube:
As was the case with Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty, anyone who has been keeping an eye on the former Speaker of the House will not be surprised by this announcement. Fox News, which employed him as a paid commentator, was pressuring him to make up his mind about getting in the race or not. He and fellow 2012er Rick Santorum were initially suspended from their contracts with Fox for 60 days, with a May 1 deadline to make up their mind whether they were running or not. May 1 came and went, so Fox terminated both their contracts.
Unlike Pawlenty, Gingrich was honest enough to himself and the public to openly admit that he was running for president, rather than hiding behind the semantics of an exploratory committee.
I suppose this is as good an occasion as any to tell my Gingrich story. I randomly ran into him inside St. Peter's Basilica in Rome two years ago while I was working on a story for another organization. He was traveling with his wife, who at the time was a member of an American church choir (don't know if she still is) that was performing in the basilica. Small world…
When Is a Presidential Announcement Not a Presidential Announcement?
Posted: April 12, 2011 in 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries, Politics
Tags: 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries, Politics, Republicans, Tim Pawlenty
When you're Tim Pawlenty, apparently… Take a look at this exchange he had with CNN's Piers Morgan:
Morgan: There was a poll out only today, a CNN poll which probably made quite the disturbing reading for you. Did you ever imagine in your wildest nightmares that you'd see a poll of potential Republican candidates which had you at 2 percent and Donald Trump at 19 percent?
Pawlenty: Well for me, I'm just getting known Piers. So our trajectory is kind of a tortoise and hare strategy and as we get better known particularly in the early states I think you'll see those numbers change for me. But as to Donald Trump, the Donald I think he's funny, I think he's exciting. He's obviously very successful. I think he brings a lot to the debate so I welcome him to it. If hair is going to be a factor in this race, Piers then I'm going to grow my mullet back out. I had a mullet when I played hockey in high school.
Morgan: In a hypothetical scenario governor, if someone like Donald Trump was to emerge as the Republican nominee and asked you to be vice president, would you accept that honor?
Pawlenty: I'm running for president. I'm not putting my hat in the ring rhetorically or ultimately for vice president so I'm focused on running for president.
(Emphasis in the transcript is mine)
Pawlenty spokesman Alex Conant had to walk back the remarks, telling CNN, "As the governor has said many times, he is not running to be anybody's vice president. He will have a formal announcement about running for president later this spring."
Conant has also taken to Twitter to push back against CNN:
@sanuzis have you seen full quote? he didn't announce anything. @CNN took quote out of context.
As was the case with Mitt Romney's announcement earlier this week, the fact that Tim Pawlenty is getting ready to run for president is not news to anybody who has been keeping an eye on him since 2008, and more so during the lead up to the 2010 elections as his gubernatorial term was winding down. However, the fact that he actually said the words "I'm running for president," would automatically trigger alarm bells for any political journalist watching the interview. It may not have been a formal photo op event with a backdrop and a podium, but it is fair for CNN and other news organizations to quote him saying "I'm running for president." It may not have been the intended message Pawlenty and Conant wanted out there, but it's impossible to unring that bell, especially when it's on video.
Regardless of semantics, the fact that Pawlenty was the first Republican candidate to announce the formation of a presidential exploratory committee was a pretty big indicator that he was running for president. All other subsequent announcements, no matter how official they may be declared, are really just formalities.
Romney's In
Posted: April 12, 2011 in 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries
Tags: 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries, Mitt Romney, Republicans
To the surprise of absolutely no one who has been keeping an eye on him since the 2008 elections. He made the announcement via Twitter:
I am announcing my Exploratory Committee for President of the United States. Join us at http://www.mittromney.com #Mitt2012
He rebooted his website, which contains the following video message:
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson pointed out on Twitter and on CNN's "John King USA" that the R in the Romney logo looks like it was done with Aquafresh toothpaste. He may have a point. Have a look at this side-by-side comparisons of the logos from the two websites:
Romney is the second Republican to form an exploratory committee. The intent in announcing is the same reason the president announced a week ago: it allows the committee to start raising money for a presidential campaign. According to Roll Call, Romney will criss-cross the country on a fundraising blitz for the next six weeks, beginning with an event at New York's Harbor Club today.
This Politico article is a good recap summing up Romney's background and the challenges he will face the second time around. The key dynamic change from four years ago is the passage of Obama's health care plan, which Obama and many Democrats have repeatedly and gleefully pointed out was based in part on the health care plan Romney signed into law as governor of Massachusetts. Romney is now stuck with the tricky political position of trying to defend his accomplishments as governor while at the same time distancing his health care plan from the Obama health care plan, which is politically radioactive in Republican circles. This could help sink his chances at winning the nomination. Obama and the Democrats know this, and that is why they complement him as much as they can.
Don't know if Romney's strategists and branding people did their homework before launching the website, but Ben Smith points out that Romney's "Believe in America" slogan was previously used by Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry during his unsuccessful presidential run in 2004.
Another Kerry-Romney comparison comes from former DNC staffer Matt Ortega who recently launched the site Multiple Choice Mitt. It is essentially the Democrats using George W. Bush's highly successful flip-flop attacks on Kerry, this time aimed squarely at Romney.
Donald Trump's Kind Words for Pelosi, $50K for Rahm
Posted: April 6, 2011 in 2012 Elections, GOP Primaries, Politics
Tags: 2012 Elections, American Crossroads, Campaign Finance, Donald Trump, Follow the Money, GOP Primaries, Politics, Rahm Emanuel, Republicans
Somebody's been doing some oppo research on the Donald…
Donald Trump sent Nancy Pelosi warm wishes when she was sworn in as House Speaker in January 2007, praising her as "the best" in a personal note.
Trump, who's now mulling a Republican run for president, penned the note on a copy of a New York Times article that chronicled Pelosi's swearing-in, and wrote, "Nancy — you're the best. Congrats. Donald," according to sources familiar with the missive.
Trump, now a registered Republican, is a former independent and former registered Democrat. And the Pelosi note is a reminder that he has a past political history of supporting both sides of the aisle.
Trump confirmed to POLITICO he wrote the note, but said it was "because I want her to do great, and I want this country to be great, and I [didn't] want her to fail as Speaker. And I like her."
His past campaign contributions run the spectrum of American politics, including prominent Democrats and Republicans. However, two in particular from the recent past jump out at me. First, this $50,000 donation to American Crossroads, the conservative 527 group, made on October 6, 2010 (screengrab from FEC electronic records):
The second is this $50,000 donation to Rahm Emanuel's mayoral campaign in Chicago, made just before Christmas of last year, but after the big Republican wins in the 2010 midterms (screengrab from Illinois State Board of Elections electronic records):
You'll recall Emanuel's previous job was as chief of staff to President Obama – the man Trump would be running against if he commits to the 2012 presidential race. If Trump decides to jump into the 2012 Republican sweepstakes, I assume this is an issue that will come up from other campaigns.
Who Runs the Republican Party?
Posted: March 2, 2009 in Barack Obama, Beltway Drama, Media, Politics
Tags: Barack Obama, Beltway Drama, Eric Cantor, Media, Michael Steele, Phil Gingrey, Politics, Rahm Emanuel, Republican National Committee, Republicans, Rush Limbaugh
Much has been made of Rush Limbaugh's widely quoted "I hope Obama fails" comment, which he first made on his radio show a few days before Obama's inauguration, and repeated it again at CPAC this past weekend.
Democrats have seized the initiative and are trying to make Rush Limbaugh the face and driving force of the GOP. Rahm Emanuel himself threw down the gauntlet on the Sunday talk shows yesterday.
Keep in mind Republican Rep. Phil Gingrey publicly apologized after making comments in a Politico story criticizing Rush Limbaugh.
Eric Cantor, the second highest ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, distanced himself from Limbaugh's comments yesterday.
Now, we'll see if Michael Steele, the chairman of the Republican Party, is going to face the same kind of pressure to make amends with Limbaugh.
These episodes show just how large of a shadow Limbaugh and his audience casts on the Republican Party. I can't think of anyone else in political or media circles on the right or left who has this much muscle that they can force a sitting member of Congress to issue a public apology. The question now is how far will he go with his rhetoric and how far is the Republican Party and the base willing to follow him?
Update: Limbaugh responds to Steele:
"Why do you claim to lead the Republican Party when you seem obsessed with seeing to it President Obama succeeds?" Limbaugh addressed Steele.
"I frankly am stunned that the chairman of the Republican National Committee endorses such an agenda. I have to conclude that he does because he attacks me for wanting it to fail," said Limbaugh.
Late last week, Steele told CNN's D.L. Hughley that Limbaugh is an "entertainer" whose comments are "ugly."
Also on his radio program Monday, Limbaugh said Steele is being used by the "liberal media."
"Michael Steele has been around long enough to know that the liberal media will use him by twisting what I say or what others say," he said. "He took the bait, he bit down hard on the bait, he launched an attack on me, even though the premise of what was said to him was false."
Update II: Damn, that was fast. Steele apologized to Limbaugh.
Limbaugh said he's not in charge of the Republican Party, but every time a Party leader or elected official has to kiss his ring every time they say or do something that annoys him, it just reinforces the Democrats' message strategy that Limbaugh is the de facto leader of the GOP.
Update III: Andrew Sullivan has reactions to the Limbaugh-Steele feud from the conservative blogosphere.
Jindal's Rebuttal
Posted: February 25, 2009 in Barack Obama, Politics
Tags: Barack Obama, Bobby Jindal, GOP, Is It 2012 Yet?, Politics, Republicans
Louisiana governor and rumored 2012 presidential candidate Bobby Jindal was tapped to give the GOP rebuttal to Barack Obama's first address to Congress. John Cole brutally explains the sacrificial lamb nature of this political tradition. It seems especially relevant this year considering Obama's well known reputation as a public speaker. Anybody who would have to follow him would have an easier time taking the stage after the Rolling Stones or U2.
Now, in fairness, the responses are always awful. Every year (with the exception of Jim Webb) someone is trotted out and forced to give the response, and it is at this point the political equivalent of throwing a virgin into a volcano. It is beyond time for them to end. However, there was something just especially awful this year, and already the comparison to Kenneth from 30 Rock is sweeping across the intertubes.
Jindal's speech is being panned left, right, and center, with some of the harshest and most surprising criticism coming from his own party.
This was not a good national coming out party for Jindal, especially if he has presidential ambitions in 2012. However, one bad national speech does not mean it's the end of your aspirations for higher office. Remember Bill Clinton's much panned speech during the 1988 Democratic National Convention? He went on to bigger and better things four short years later.
Twitter DC
Posted: February 24, 2009 in Beltway Drama, Internet, Media
Tags: Beltway Drama, Democrats, Internet, Media, Politics, Republicans, Twitter
Politico ranks the ten most influential Twitter users in DC.
Stimulus Bill 2010 Politics
Tags: 2010 Elections, Congress, Democrats, Economy, Obama Administration, Politics, Republicans, Stimulus Bill
The Hill's Aaron Blake looks at the short and long-term political implications of the stimulus bill, with an eye on 2010.
The stimulus package has emerged as the first major campaign issue of the 2010 election cycle, and a Republican Party eyeing a return to the majority is going all-in.
The near-universal GOP opposition to the stimulus means that, for 2010 at least, Democrats own the result. Republicans, meanwhile, are in the awkward position of banking on it, at least electorally, to fail.
In the end, only three Republicans voted for the stimulus package — all in the Senate — while 11 Democrats voted against it — all in the House.
The only senator who is up in 2010 to break party ranks was Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), who is in the unenviable position of dealing with both a blue-trending state and a conservative backlash over the vote.
Potential primary opponents like former Rep. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and businessman Glen Meakem bristled at Specter's vote and now have new motivation to challenge him next year.
"I really thought he was trying to avoid a primary challenge, and it's very clear to me from this vote that he is really not anymore," Meakem said, adding: "I think leading conservatives are going to coalesce around a candidate here in the next month or two."
Another candidate with plenty riding on the vote is potential Senate candidate Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.), who has taken to criticizing Democratic leaders over their conduct.
Shuler drew a sharp rebuke from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) after he said Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) "failed" to make the package bipartisan.
Shuler is considered a top potential challenger to Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) in 2010. And even if Shuler stays in the House, he could face a tough race in a very conservative district.
Unlike Shuler, many of those breaking ranks on the stimulus vote are safe, including several Blue Dog Democrats and Republican Maine Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins.
Blue Dog member Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) is facing a primary challenge from state Sen. Al Lawson, meaning his vote could be a liability. In announcing his intentions Wednesday, Lawson signaled that the vote would be front-and-center in the race.
The Republicans' strategy is clear: they want the Democrats to own this bill if it fails. But if the economy is in recovery by Election Day, the whole thing will blow up in their face, and the Democrats can label them as obstructionists who voted against the economic recovery. We'll see who gets the last laugh in about 19 months from now.
Posted: January 28, 2009 in Beltway Drama
Tags: Beltway Drama, George W. Bush, Mike Duncan, Republican National Committee, Republicans
According to today's Washington Post, change is in the air as the Republican National Committee looks for its next chairman.
2008 Election Recap: Winners and Losers
Posted: November 6, 2008 in 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John McCain, Sarah Palin
Tags: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, Democratic National Committee, Democrats, George W. Bush, Howard Dean, Joe Biden, Joe Lieberman, John Ensign, John McCain, John Weaver, Karl Rove, Katie Couric, Mark Penn, Mark Salter, National Republican Senatorial Committee, NRSC, Republicans, Rick Davis, Sarah Palin, Steve Schmidt, Terry Nelson, Tim Mahoney, Tina Fey, Tom DeLay
– Barack Obama and Joe Biden: Like this needs explaining?
– Howard Dean: He crashed and burned as a presidential candidate four years ago, but a once in a lifetime candidate and political dynamic vindicated his 50 state strategy as the Democrats explanded their electoral map for the first time in decades.
– The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints: The Mormons got a lot of press this year, good and bad, because of Mitt Romney's candidacy. They were also the driving force in successfully funding and generating support for Proposition 8 in California.
– David Axelrod and David Plouffe: Obama's two Davids masterminded one of the greatest political campaigns in history, one which will be studied and replicated for decades in the United States and around the world.
– The polls: Most campaign polls were right in assessing the mood of the local and national electorate, and correctly foresaw an Obama victory of historic proportions.
– Tina Fey: Energized her career with a dead accurate and brutal impression of Sarah Palin on Saturday Night Live.
– Katie Couric: May have resurrected her career bona fides with her gentle televised mauling of Sarah Palin. That interview will be studied in journalism schools for years to show how brutally effective and newsworthy a simple follow-up question can be.
– John McCain: There can be only one winner in a presidential election, and McCain ran as best as he could in one of the harshest political environments for Republicans since 1974.
– Sarah Palin: Five words – Not ready for prime time. She energized the Republican base at the expense of everyone else, many of whom were scared at the idea of an unexperienced and unqualified candidate being one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency. She might have been a rising star in the party before this cycle, but given the fact that she was a net negative for the ticket this time around, any chances of her being on the national ticket in 2012 are slim.
– Steve Schmidt, Rick Davis, Mark Salter, Terry Nelson and John Weaver: The McCain brain trust throughout the campaign was fraught with mixed messages and competing egos. Unlike Obama's consistent message of change, the McCain campaign never had one, and bounced from idea to idea in hopes of turning their electoral fortunes around. They also thought it would be a good idea running on change v. experience based on their candidate's compelling life story, ignoring the fact that Hillary Clinton tried making the same argument and failed.
– Mark Penn: He severely miscalculated the national mood of the electorate to the point where he may be guilty of political malpractice. He was also a source of constant friction within the Clinton campaign, who did not see the warning signs and did not want to get rid of him. In the end, his lobbying deal for Colombia was too much embarrassment for the campaign to handle and he got demoted.
– Joe Lieberman: He bucked his own party and endorsed the Republican ticket. He's about to find out the hard way that elections have consequences.
– George W. Bush: He was a radioactive albatross tied to John McCain and nearly every Republican incumbent around the country this year. He didn't do much campaigning, but like Keyser Soze in the Usual Suspects, he was the large unseen presence lurking throughout the race.
– Tim Mahoney: He wins election because his opponent was involved in a sex scandal, only to go down in defeat himself two years later because of a sex scandal.
– Karl Rove and Tom DeLay: Four years after President Bush's re-election mandate, the dream of a permanent Republican majority is dead.
John Ensign: After the fiasco of 2006, Ensign didn't do a much better job in helping his party stave off losses in the Senate. This time, it was arguably more consequential, because the Democrats are now inching closer to a 60-seat supermajority when their party controls the White House.