Misleading Archeology Headline of the Week
On April 21, 2021 April 19, 2021 By Jennifer Mugrage
"Pottery Shard May Be 'Missing Link' in the Alphabet's Development"
So, according to the article itself, here's what is really going on:
"… the script represents a "missing link" connecting alphabetic inscriptions found in Egypt and Sinai with later writing from Canaan. The writing uses an early version of the alphabet in which letters bear a resemblance to the Egyptian hieroglyphs they evolved from. The finding appears to overturn a previous hypothesis that the alphabet only came to Canaan when Egypt ruled the area."
OK, so instead of this particular alphabet being brought directly from Egypt through imperialism, it seeped over much earlier, through cultural influence. That's a "missing link"? O.K.
Also, note that this shard has been dated to about 1450 B.C., which is much younger than some other systems of writing, including the Vinca signs.
But my favorite line from the article is this: "… the researchers have not definitively determined what the inscription says. Also unclear is whether the writing was meant to be read from left to right or right to left." So, we don't know whether to read it right to left, but we have come up with a tentative translation.
ancient worldlinguisticsrantssci-fi
Want to join my e-mail list?
6 thoughts on "Misleading Archeology Headline of the Week"
BGCT2VA
If the writing is altogether unclear there's no doubt it was written by a lawyer!
Ha ha, I believe the ancient world had just as many lawyers and bureaucrats as we do!
Which proves that although they really only know they found a shard they have to say something. Human nature.
When you have a theory, never let facts, or a lack of facts, stand in the way!
Em @ The Geeky Jock
I've never heard of Vinca signs before – they're fascinating!
Right???