Treanor on Gouverneur Morris, the Committee of Style and the Constitution
William Michael Treanor, Georgetown University Law Center, has posted Framer's Intent: Gouverneur Morris, the Committee of Style, and the Creation of the Federalist Constitution:
Gouverneur Morris (LC)
At the end of the proceedings of the federal constitutional convention, the delegates appointed the Committee on Style and Arrangement to bring together the textual provisions that the convention had previously agreed to and to prepare a final constitution. Pennsylvania delegate Gouverneur Morris was assigned to draft the document for the committee, and, with few revisions and little debate, the convention subsequently adopted the Committee's proposed constitution. For more than two hundred years, questions have been raised as to whether Morris as drafter covertly made changes in the text in order to advance his constitutional vision, but the legal scholars and historians studying the convention have concluded that Morris was an honest scrivener. No prior article, however, has systematically compared the Committee's draft to the previously adopted resolutions or discussed the implications of those changes for constitutional law. This article reveals how many changes Morris made to the text delegates had previously agreed to and how important those changes were (and are). It shows that many of the central elements of the Constitution (including the Preamble; the basic Article I, Article II, and Article III structure; and the contract clause) were wholly or largely the product of the Committee's work. In total, Morris made twelve significant changes to the Constitution, and these textual changes advanced his constitutional goals, including strengthening the national government, the executive, and the judiciary; protecting private property; and fighting the spread of slavery. Finally, it shows that, in central debates in the early republic, Federalists, and, notably, fellow committee member Alexander Hamilton repeatedly drew on language crafted by the Committee as they fought for their expansive vision of the Constitution. In revising the constitutional text, Morris created the basis for what was to become the Hamiltonian reading of the Constitution.
This history has significant implications for modern constitutional law. While the Supreme Court has never been presented with a case that reveals the extent of the Committee's changes, in four cases it has confronted situations in which the Committee's text arguably had a different meaning than the provision previously adopted by the convention, and the Court has consistently treated the Committee's work as substantively meaningless and concluded that the prior resolutions were controlling. That approach should be rejected because it is at odds with the majoritarian premise of constitutional ratification by "the people." The text that was ratified is controlling. At the same time, in most circumstances, Morris's language was ambiguous. A modern public meaning originalist approach leads to the conclusion that Morris's revisions made possible alternate readings of the Constitution: it supported what was to become the Federalist approach, but did not prevent Republican textualist readings. On important contemporary issues, focus on Morris's text makes us aware of originalist understandings of the text that have been frequently dismissed or wholly forgotten; although it does not eliminate the originalist basis for narrower readings, that focus provides new originalist support for broad understandings of congressional, judicial, and presidential power and for protection of private property.
Labels: Constitutional studies, Originalism and the Founding Period, Scholarship -- Articles and essays
History's Failures and Historians' Duties
LSA Hurst Prize in Socio-Legal History to De, Welch
Icenhauer-Ramirez's "Treason on Trial"
Somos, "American States of Nature"
Maltz on Justice Powell's Jurisprudence
Moyn on human rights and inequality
Whittington on "Judicial Review Acts of Congress f...
AALS CFP: Century of Woman Suffrage
Cheffins, "The Public Company Transformed"
Edited Collection in Honor of Sir John Baker ("Eng...
Chapman on the Hodges Treason Case
LHR 37:2
Morrison on legal lynching
Wineapple, "The Impeachers"
Zunino, "Justice Framed: A Genealogy of Transition...
Schlegel's "Crib" on Critical Legal History
Kotch on the Death Penalty in North Carolina
Leonard and Cornell, "The Partisan Republic"
Schweninger on Freedom Suits in the South
Fitzpatrick on courtrooms and geography in Punjab
Farahat, "The Foundation of Norms of Islamic Juris...
MacMillan and Smith, eds., "Challenges to Authorit...
Jaffe on Jonathan Jasper Wright and Reconstruction...
New Stories about the Warren Court
Fradera on citizens and subjects in four empires
Gaius and Jane Bolin
Motor Carrier Regulation and the Law, 1920-1955
Gaspare J. Saladino, Remembered
Smith on Equity
Forsyth's "Common Law and Natural Law in America"
Rosenblatt on Patents and the Sherlockian Canon
Elangovan on B. S. Rao and the Indian Constitution
Horwitz on Barnette
Taylor, "Race for Profit"
Thomas on Constructive Trusts to 1827
Treanor on Gouverneur Morris, the Committee of Sty...
Ranney on Mississippi's legal history
Three English Revolutions: An ICH Summer Workshop
"Chevron" Revisited
Ernst on the New Deal FCC
ASLH Student Research Colloquium 2019
Roberts on the Imperial Origins of American Public...
Publisher's Query: Holmes's "Black Book"
Narrative as a Mode of Argument
Murray, Shaw, & Seigel, eds., "Reproductive Rights...
CFP: New Histories of Sovereigns and Sovereignties
Weinberger Named Berger-Howe Fellow
Deadline Approaching to Apply for AJLH US Editor-i...
CFP: 100 Years of Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolven...
Anderson on 19th-Century Trial Manuals on Jury Cha...
Call for Nominations: Cromwell Article Prize
Schwartz on Lamazoff on the Bank War
Harrison on Public Rights and Article III
Rothchild on the US and International Copyright
Newman on Meat Inspection and Public Choice
A Book Greater than the Sum of its Chapters
Registration for ASLH 2019 Now Open!
Quinn on a "Fallen" Woman Judge
Thomas on the 19th Amendment and Pay Equity
Sohoni on "The Trump Administration and the Law of...
Burney, Hamlin and friends on Global Forensic Cult...
Collins on Hayden Covington
The Future of Books?
Laird and Witt on Inventing the War Crime
Cairns's Watson Lectures on Slavery and Scotland
Schwartz on Jackson's Bank Veto and McCulloch
Cromwell-ASLH Research Fellowships
Welcome, Sarah Seo! / Seo, "Policing the Open Road"
Mathen on advisory opinions in Canada