Brum2Jerusalem Blog
Mostly about the Palestine / Israel injustice
Israel, the West and shameless hypocrisy
On March 21, 2018 March 20, 2018 By kamelhawwashIn Coloumns, EU, Iran, Iraq, Israel, middle east monitor, Moving US EMbassy, Occupation, Palestine, Security Council, Settlements, Syria, United States
First published by the Middle East Monitor on 20/3/2018
The current crisis between Britain and Russia offers yet another example of the shameless hypocrisy of the West when dealing with Israel and almost any other country. Why bring Israel into the attempted murder of two people on the streets of Britain in which Russia, not Israel is implicated? I do so because of the sudden regard for international law that has resurfaced in Western political circles.
Speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson accused Russia of using military-grade nerve agent and stated that the two were clear, "that the use of such agent is a clear violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention and a flagrant breach of international law." A day earlier, he claimed on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show that Russia had been in breach of international law for the past 10 years because it had been stockpiling nerve agent during that period. Conservative Party chairman Brendan Lewis, speaking on Peston on Sunday, also referred to Russia's action as being in breach of international law.
Johnson was backed by the EU's Foreign Ministers who adopted a statement of support for Britain. "Any such use [of nerve agent] is a clear violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, a breach of international law and undermines the rules-based international order," they said.
Shortly after the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter, the US, France, Germany and Britain issued a joint statement condemning the attack, which took place in the small English city of Salisbury: "It is an assault on UK sovereignty, and any such use by a state party is a clear violation of the chemical weapons convention and a breach of international law."
Accusations that Russia has been in breach of international law have in the past related to its action against the Ukraine and what the West sees as its occupation of Crimea, which Russia disputes. In March 2017, the US Mission in the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) stated that, "The United States remains deeply concerned about ongoing Russian violations of international law and defiance of OSCE principles and commitments in Crimea."
The statement further accused the Russian occupation authorities of "continuing to commit serious abuses against Crimean Tatars, ethnic Ukrainians, and all others who oppose Russia's occupation of the peninsula."
When the late Saddam Hussein sent his troops into Kuwait in 1990, the international community only allowed that occupation to stand for seven months. The Iraqi dictator had annexed Kuwait, declaring it to be his country's 19th province. However, a coalition of forces from 35 countries was formed to free Kuwait, which ejected the Iraqis in early 1991. No one then talked of the Kuwaiti resistance against Iraq's occupation as "terrorism".
Both Iraq and Russia faced sanctions for what the international community regarded as illegal acts in Kuwait and Ukraine respectively. There is talk now about further sanctions against Russia following the attack in Salisbury. There are even calls for the English football team to boycott the FIFA World Cup, due to take place in Russia this summer. Responding to a question in the House of Commons, Boris Johnson told fellow MPs that if Russia is implicated then he thought it would be "difficult to see how UK representation at the World Cup can go ahead in the normal way."
Some in the West are questioning how Russia can continue to hold a seat as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, which allows it to wield a veto whenever it chooses. This, it is argued, means it can vote down any resolution that criticises Moscow or its allies, or even considers imposing sanctions on, say, the Syrian government for its actions.
Here, then, is the hypocrisy of the West, which seems hell-bent on singling Israel out for exceptional protection from criticism or meaningful sanctions despite its 50-year long illegal occupation of Palestinian, Syrian and Lebanese land, and its 70-year ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. Just like Russia and Iraq, Israel has annexed illegally-occupied land, including East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
The US has been severely critical of Russia for its use of the veto when it comes to Syria and Iran. In 2015, the then US Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, claimed that Russian vetoes were "putting the UN Security Council's legitimacy at risk." Her successor Nikki Hayley even threatened that if Russia continues to use its veto then the US may have to take unilateral action against Iran. This was after Russia vetoed a resolution that had been watered down from a condemnation of Iran for violating an arms embargo on Houthi leaders in Yemen to "noting with particular concern".The particular hypocrisy of the US lies in its own use of the veto power on 43 occasions in support of Israel, the last of which was against criticism of its own action in recognising Jerusalem as capital of the Zionist state in December last year. This does not include the number of times that the threat of the US using its veto resulted in resolutions not even making it to a Security Council vote, including an attempt by the PLO to secure recognition of Palestine as a state in 2014.
Britain's hypocrisy can be demonstrated in its support for sanctions against Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq and its support for sanctions against Russia but its absolute refusal to consider sanctioning Israel for any matter, including its illegal colonial-settlement enterprise and alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. The UK has actually worked to oppose any boycott or sanction against a state that stands accused of Apartheid by an ESCWA report which was sanctioned by the UN but was then taken down under pressure from the US and Israel.
Prominent members of the British government and long-established members of Conservative Friends of Israel work overtime to shield Israel. Environment Secretary Michael Gove, to his utter disgrace, labelled the peaceful and moral Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), designed to pressure Israel to comply with international law, as "anti-Semitic". Gove has even called for Britain to move its Embassy to Jerusalem in a move that would be against international laws and conventions.
Britain has now indicated that it might not send members of the Royal family to the World Cup in Russia but has announced that Prince William — second in line to the throne — will make an official visit to Israel this year despite its continued illegal occupation of Palestinian land, its illegal annexation of Jerusalem, its Apartheid Wall and its illegal siege on Gaza which has been said to constitute collective punishment and is thus a war crime.
Palestinians and their supporters, therefore, have ample reason to call out the international community for its hypocrisy and double standards when it comes to dealing with Israel, whose illegal actions and breaches of international law have accompanied its whole 70-year existence. Remember this fact the next time that a Western politician defends Israel's breaches of international law as "acts of self-defence". It is the only country in the world to which the permanent members of the UN Security Council and others in the West grant such exceptional immunity.
EUHypocricyIsraelRussiaUKUSA
Israel's 'humiliation queue' for East Jerusalem Palestinians
Israel, Occidente y la hipocresía
هل تنهي الانتخابات الفلسطينية صفحة الانقسام؟
GCC summit in Saudi Arabia and reconciliation with Qatar
بريطانيا | هل يدفع جونسون ضريبة "بريكست" ويخسر الانتخابات المقبلة؟
عن المصالحة والانتخابات الفلسطينية
Email: info@kamelhawwash.com
Administrative Detention
Alaqsa
BDS Law
bedouins
Coloumns
Deal of the Centuary
house demolitions
Indus News
Inside Arabia
Israeli elections
Jamal Khashuggy
Jewish terror
Moving US EMbassy
Normalaisation
Palestine Forum
The Arab Weekly
فلسطينيو بريطانيا
فايروس الكورونا
قناة DMC
قناة مكملين
قناة وطن المصرية
قناة أوراس
قناة اكسترا نيوز
قناة الميادين
قناة المغاربية
قناة النجاح NBC
قناة النجاح الفضائية
قناة الجزيرة
قناة الحوار
قناة العهد
قناة الغد العربي
قناة صوت العرب
قنات أوراس
قانون القومية
مسيرة العودة المكبرى
وكالة وطن
وعد بلفور
أسرا
إنتفاضة
إحتلال
إضراب عن الطعام
الكراهية
اللوبي الإسرائيلي
المقاومة الشعبية
المقاطعة
المستوطنات
المصالحة
الهندسة والعلوم
الأبارتايد
الإنتخابات البريطانية
الإسلاموفوبيا
الإستيطان
الانتخابات البريطانية
البريكسيت
التطبيع
التطرف
العنصرية
بريكسيت
تلفزين العربي
تضامن
تطبيع
حماس
حصار غرة
خطة الضم
راديو عَلَم
عربي 21
Pikos Apikos on GCC summit in Saudi Arabia and…
Pikos Apikos on The Expansion of the Israeli A…
Pikos Apikos on OPINIÓN | Es hora de oficializ…
Pikos Apikos on It is time to make it official…
Pikos Apikos on شاهد: المواجهة الإيرانية الإسر…