Philosophy Q&A
Reference request for an argument that atheism is a natural consequence if we do not treat the world as special
What is the argument for atheism?
Arguments for atheism range from philosophical to social and historical approaches. Rationales for not believing in deities include the lack of evidence, the problem of evil, the argument from inconsistent revelations, the rejection of concepts that cannot be falsified, and the argument from nonbelief.
What is the cosmological argument for the existence of God?
A cosmological argument, in natural theology, is an argument which claims that the existence of God can be inferred from facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects.
Who created the cosmological argument?
cosmological argument, Form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of God. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument: the first-cause argument and the argument from contingency.
What is a contingent being?
A contingent being (a being such that if it exists, it could have not-existed) exists. All contingent beings have a sufficient cause of or fully adequate explanation for their existence.
What is atheism philosophy?
atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence.
How do you respond to an atheist?
Right there there is no God I'm emphatic on that it doesn't matter what evidence you present to me it's not admissible in the courtroom of my mind because I know God does not exist.
What is a brute contingency?
What you call a "brute contingency (something just is, no reason)" is, in fact, a necessary being (disregard for the moment that "being" connotes a mind).
What is the cosmological argument simple?
The cosmological argument is an attempt to prove the existence of God by the fact that things exist. It assumes that things must have a cause, and that the chain of causes can only end by a supernatural event.
What is the argument of contingency?
The "Argument from Contingency" examines how every being must be either necessary or contingent. Since not every being can be contingent, it follow that there must be a necessary being upon which all things depend.
What is the teleological argument for God's existence?
The basic premise, of all teleological arguments for the existence of God, is that the world exhibits an intelligent purpose based on experience from nature such as its order, unity, coherency, design and complexity.
Are contingent facts self explanatory?
Would the entire series of contingent things have an explanation? The explanation of the entire series cannot be a member of the series since then it would explain itself and no contingent thing is self-explanatory.
What is an institutional fact?
And John Searle, who then established the term 'institutional fact', defined them quite explicitly as facts that 'require human institutions for their existence' (1995, p. 2; cf. 2010a, pp. 10–11).
What is a brute fact in sociology?
In contemporary philosophy, a brute fact is a fact that cannot be explained in terms of a deeper, more "fundamental" fact. There are two main ways to explain something: say what "brought it about", or describe it at a more "fundamental" level.
What are the institutional factors?
There are institutional factors related to the maturity of real estate markets, as they play a major role in determining the risks of different markets. A range of institutional factors are important, including liquidity, the reliability of professional services and the availability of market information.
Can brute facts be explained by other facts?
Rather than repels why gravity exists why does gravity pull objects towards each other. Another. Example might be if you believe in say libertarian. Free will in the metaphysical. Sense not the
Emulation, simulation and the real thing
How do religious pluralists decide on exclusion?
Is freedom always either completely subjective or psychopathic?
What is the difference between functionalism and property dualism?
What are the theories related to Business Integrity and Ethics?
Motivation Q&A
Why write? On the author's motivation
Is the idea of the word of God a means to understand human nature, and prayer?
Is free will fundamental property of everything?
Are all Informal Logic really just Formal Logic in disguise?
Did any specific philosophy contribute to the world wars?
On Latin reception of Avicenna
Difference between Husserl and Sartre on ego?
Buddhism in Phaedo
What are the best Arguments against solipsism?
Why do we have a problem about understanding the concept of the "empty set"?
What books offer a philosophical interpretation of contemporary physics?
What is the argument in this Paragraph
What do Montaigne, Paine, and Wittgenstein have in common?
What are the properties of Mathematical Objects?
Which Informal Fallacy(ies)? 'Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.'
Eternal universe vs. creation in greek phillosophy
How do you negate an "at least" statement?
How do we determine the line of life that is acceptable and not acceptable to kill?
The Ethics of Brainwashing
Logical fallacy — discrediting someone because they do something you agree with
How did Kant define knowledge?