Tag Archives: Stannis
June 15, 2014 · 10:05 pm
Season Finale: Game of Thrones – "The Children"
"You remember where the heart is?"
Each season of Game of Thrones has been an exercise in selective adaptation, but its fourth season has been a feat of adaptive engineering. Working primarily with material from the third book but leaning heavily on the fourth and fifth in certain storylines, it is the season that has emphatically taken the "book-to-season" adaptation comparison off the table.
At the same time, though, the season has been organized around key climaxes taken directly from the third book in the series. Moreso than in other seasons, you could tell the writers were having to stretch storylines to maintain the timing they had established, creating material to flesh out the scenes on The Wall to justify the Battle of Castle Black taking place in episode nine or finding things for Arya and the Hound to do so that their scenes in "The Children" wouldn't take place until the end of the season.
By and large, I would argue the show was successful in making the season work despite the delaying tactics. This is in part because the storyline in King's Landing, arguably the most consistently substantial, was built for this timeline, clearly marked by two major events—the Purple Wedding and the Mountain vs. the Viper—with plenty of political intrigue in between. The other reason is that even if the material at the Wall was a bit thin in ways that even last week's epic showdown couldn't make up for, the season as a whole maintained a sense of forward momentum. Did this momentum extend to Bran, forgotten for multiple episodes, or to Stannis and Davos' trip to Braavos? No. But it extended to pretty much every other storyline, and makes "The Children" the most climactic finale the series has managed yet. The inconclusiveness of "The Watchers On The Wall" may have been frustrating, but it guaranteed that there was still lots to resolve even for those of us who aren't sitting at home with checklists of what's "supposed" to happen in the episode.
And "The Children" resolved some of it, left some of it untouched, and by and large served as one big—and mostly effective—teaser for what's to come.
Filed under Game of Thrones
Tagged as Analysis, Arya, Bran, Brienne, Charles Dance, Daenerys, Death, Drogon, Episode 10, Finale, HBO, Jojen, Jon Snow, Maisie Williams, Peter Dinklage, Review, Rory McCann, Season 4, Season Finale, Shae, Stannis, Television, The Children, The Hound, Three-Eyed Raven, TV, Tyrion, Tywin, Westeros
Game of Thrones – "The Laws of Gods and Men"
"The Laws of Gods and Men"
"We prefer the stories they tell. More plain, less open to interpretation."
This is why the Iron Bank of Braavos prefers numbers.
They're strange, in this way: whereas the other groups who jostle for power in Westeros (and across the Narrow Sea) are interested in histories and lineages, the Iron Bank is only concerned with numbers. It's why they're unmoved by Stannis' claim to the throne by blood, and why they're won over by Davos' claim that Stannis is the closest Westeros has to a stable ruler should Tywin Lannister meet his end.
Interpretation is at the heart of law, of course, and of the men and women who enact it. Although the majority of the episode is taken up by an actual trial, the storylines that precede it show the reverberations of other forms of justice, in which similarly cruel acts are taken for fundamentally different reasons.
The question becomes whether history will interpret them differently.
Tagged as Alik Sakharov, Analysis, Braavos, Bryan Cogman, Daenerys, Davos, Episode 6, HBO, Iron Bank, Mark Gatiss, Oberyn, Peter Dinklage, Ramsay Snow, Reek, Review, Season 4, Stannis, Television, The Law of Gods and Men, Theon, Trial, TV, Tyrion, Varys
June 9, 2013 · 10:56 pm
Season Finale: Game of Thrones – "Mhysa"
"Mhysa"
"Here only the family name matters."
As Varys explains this fact to Shae, he's being pragmatic: he's trying to help someone whose very existence at King's Landing threatens her own life and the life of the man she loves. Varys acknowledges that she has made Tyrion better. Varys acknowledges that hers is a true love. And yet Varys also gives her a collection of diamonds, telling her to sail to Pentos and start a new life for herself so that her love can do something good for Westeros without the threat of a single-named woman hanging over him.
It's dark advice, advice that Shae refuses to take. Despite the fact that we just saw both Robb Stark and Talisa die for following true love over pragmatism, and despite the fact that Jon Snow just took three arrows from the woman he loves, Shae proves what many other characters have learned as well: there is still power in love even when all signs would suggest that trusting in such power will be your undoing.
"Mhysa" is about this love, which may seem strange in light of the fact that last week ended on such a foreboding sendoff for Robb and Catelyn Stark. And yet Game of Thrones needed a new motivation beyond ascending to the throne, a sense of purpose that could evolve beyond the War of the Five Kings and the deaths of Robert Baratheon and Ned Stark which set it off. What "Mhysa" seeks to accomplish is reframe the actions of its characters not as part of a larger power struggle, but rather as actions designed to protect their families or to protect the realm. This is not to say that we are to support the Lannisters' cruelty or to endorse Melisandre's sorcery, but rather that we can shift our understanding of their actions away from a part in a larger plot and instead toward what motivated them to take those steps in the first place.
It's an enriching move that works to build a strong foundation for future seasons, although one that has some issues retroactively making some of the season's storylines resonate in the way intended. "Mhysa" concludes a third season that was only retroactively revealed—for non-readers, at least—to be the season where Game of Thrones could no longer be simplified to a battle between the Starks of Winterfell and the Lannisters of Casterly Rock, one that did its job without necessarily connecting in the process.
Tagged as Analysis, Arya, Bran, Catelyn, Cersei, Daenerys, Dany, Davos, Episode 10, Finale, Gendry, Gilly, HBO, Joffrey, Jon Snow, Mhysa, Mother, Ramsay Snow, Reek, Review, Robb, Roose Bolton, Sam, Sansa, Season 3, Season 4, Season Finale, Shae, Stannis, Television, Theon, TV, Tyrion, Westeros, Yara, Ygritte, Yunkai
Game of Thrones – "Kissed by Fire"
"Kissed By Fire"
"You swore some vows. I want you to break them."
As Ygritte seduces Jon Snow in a conveniently located hot springs, I found myself at odds with the story unfolding onscreen. Although I have long known—unlike Jon Snow, of course, who knows nothing—this scene would take place, there was something oddly romantic about the moment that struck me as off. In the books, I always remembered the scene as more complicated, a sort of alternate passage into manhood as contrasted with the vows Jon swore in front of the heart tree. It was still effectively Jon and Ygritte having sex in a cave, mind you, but I always found the moment less romantic and more adolescent.
This is, of course, because it was more adolescent given that Jon was only a teenager. The same goes for Robb Stark, whose decision to chop off the head of Richard Karstark was less an act of determination and more an act of formation, a moment when he stopped being a boy and became a leader. The show's decision to age up the younger characters made sense, and it has resulted in a number of positive story developments, but Robb and Jon are two characters whose stories have been transformed by nature of their relative maturity.
In the case of Jon's encounter with Ygritte, there's no adolescent fumbling to be found here: instead, he's a masterful lover, his desire to kiss her "there" proving quite well received. And yet whereas I once saw that scene as this brief moment of solitude, of innocence—and the removal of that innocence—in the midst of a coming war, here it just felt like Jon and Ygritte getting it on, following by some pillow talk without the pillows. It all felt too romantic, which is not to say that romance has no place in this show but rather to say that the storyline came at a point in Jon's storyline where I did not feel it earned that romance, at least not in the way I had understood it previously.
As "Kissed by Fire" unfolded, however, it became clear that Jon and Ygritte's encounter had been somewhat shifted in meaning. It wasn't about breaking up Jon and Ygritte's journey so much as it was giving us a fleeting moment of romance before destroying every other idealistic notion you could imagine. Their encounter gives the episode a brief moment of solitude, but it's not for the characters so much as it's for the audience. It is a moment of lust and freedom in a world where lust is punished, freedom is overwritten by family, and "romance" exists only as the enemy of common sense and good strategy.
Tagged as Analysis, Arya, Brotherhood without Banners, Cersei, Daenerys, Episode 5, Family, Gendry, Identity, Jaime, Jon Snow, Kissed By Fire, Loras, Review, Robb, Romance, Sansa, Seaosn 3, Shireen, Stannis, Television, TV, Tyrion, Tywin, Ygritte
Game of Thrones – "The Ghosts of Harrenhal"
"The Ghosts of Harrenhal"
"I still can't believe that you're real."
Perhaps it's my relatively unromantic disposition, but I've never really considered love in the context of Game of Thrones. It's obviously part of Martin's books, but it's so often quashed, or forbidden, or broken, that it's hard to identify it as one of the key themes (or even as a theme in some instances). However, as I noted in last week's review, the introduction of Robb's love interest reminded us that romance and desire are not entirely foreign concepts within the framework of this story.
However, as "The Ghosts of Harrenhal" observes (and as we'll see continue into next week's episode as well), that love is rarely consummated. Sam speaks of Gilly in hypotheticals, in love with a memory more than a real person, while Jorah's love for Dany (captured in the quote above) makes both of them uncomfortable, an unspoken reality they dare not bring to the surface lest it shatter their existing relationship. In other words, their love remains unromantic out of fear of what romantic love would look like, relying instead on the love you have for a brother or a sister or for your King. It's this love that ultimately threads through "The Ghosts of Harrenhal," and the season at large, and it's a love that may be equally tenuous depending on its object.
Tagged as Analysis, Arya Stark, Bran, Brienne, Catelyn, Dany, Doreah, Episode 5, Gendry, Harrenhal, Irri, Jaqen H'qhar, Joffrey, Jon Snow, Loras Tyrell, Love, Maisie Williams, Margaery Tyrell, Melisandre, Qarth, Qhorin Halfhand, Renly Baratheon, Review, Season 2, Shadow Baby, Stannis, Television, The Fist of the First Men, The Ghosts of Harrenhal, Theon Greyjoy, TV, Tyrion, Tywin Lannister, Wildfire, Winterfell, Xaro Xhoan Daxos
Game of Thrones – "The Night Lands" and Sexposition
"The Night Lands" and Sexposition
People who coin new terms are very rarely trying to coin new terms. When I used the term "sexposition" to describe a particular kind of scene in Game of Thrones, I wasn't staking a claim to a corner of the cultural lexicon so much as I was trying to be clever. In fact, for a while – and still, really – I refused to believe it was possible to "invent" such a simple portmanteau – all I did was add an "s" at the end of the day. However, the word has caught on, leading to a bizarre couple of weeks in which Esquire magazine and The Guardian were contacting me on the subject, I was listening to Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and writer Bryan Cogman talking about it on the DVD commentaries, and now it even has a Wikipedia page not to be confused with "sex position."
What I realized in chatting with these journalists, though, is that we (as a larger Game of Thrones-viewing community) had never come to a clear understanding of what sexposition even was. The first thing the Esquire journalist did was run a definition by me, and I realized that I didn't really have any corrections because I had never actually thought much about it. While I had a number of scenes connected to the term in my mind, expanding it beyond Game of Thrones would require a more rigorous set of criteria, something that became clear when Michael Hann at the Guardian began talking about sexposition in the context of Showtime's Homeland.
While Hann's article captured the overall issue quite well, asking broader questions that speak to why the word is useful in considering the implications of this particular narrative device, I was confused by the evocation of Homeland, a show I would not associate with the term (which is a larger conversation that would require spoilers, so if you really want me to expand on that let me know). Also, in following fan discussion around Game of Thrones, I've seen sexposition become more of a catch-all term for the overuse of sex and nudity in general, something that obscures the specific implications of the neologism.
"The Night Lands" features what I'd consider the season's first explicit use of sexposition as a narrative strategy, but it also features other sequences that feature similar amounts of nudity but which I would not associate with the term. Before delving a bit more into the rest of the episode, which features some of my favorite moments in the early parts of the second season, I want to tease out this distinction in an effort to consider what this sex is accomplishing, and what we make of the show effectively doubling down on the practice.
Tagged as Analysis, Arya, Dany, Episode 2, Gendry, HBO, Joe Dempsie, Maisie Williams, Melisandre, Peter Dinklage, Review, Season 2, Sex, Sexposition, Stannis, Television, The Night Lands, Theon, TV, Tyrion, Yara
Season Finale: Game of Thrones – "Fire and Blood"
"There you will see what life is worth when all the rest is gone."
Earlier this week, I rewatched last week's penultimate episode, "Baelor," with my brother who was seeing it for the first time. Generally, I've been watching Game of Thrones alone, and any interaction with other viewers has been done online (or, if done in person, was done with people who I had previously interacted with online). For the first time, I was sitting in the same room as another viewer as we watched the show, and the experience made clear what I had known from the beginning but had never seen quite so clearly visible: Game of Thrones is a show that every single viewer likely considers differently.
It is not just that we can separate between readers and non-readers, although that is certainly the most obvious distinction to be made. Rather, we need to also consider questions of genre, gender, sexual content, race, and other qualities which have been called into question over the course of the season: regardless of whether I individually had concerns with the show's use of fantasy, or its sexposition, or the Othering of the Dothraki, the fact is that those concerns existed, and have created a divisive response even among those who generally like the show.
In a piece earlier this week, friend of the blog Cory Barker wrote about his ambivalence towards the series, and kept trying to find reasons for it within the text. While his process was enlightening, he couldn't find the silver bullet: there was no one part of the show that was creating a lack of an emotional connection. How we view the series can be defined by issues like genre which are inherent to the text itself, or issues like viewing patterns which are entirely extratextual but can define one's experience with the text. My brother, for example, watched the season on a staggered schedule of short marathons, while my parents watched it on a weekly basis; as a result, they remembered different things, retaining different parts of the show that were highlighted by their personal experience with the text.
I raise all of these points because after a season of open interpretation, at least for those who hadn't read the books, there is something almost prescriptive about "Fire and Blood." While "Baelor" delivered a fatal twist, and suggested a certain degree of carnage to come in the weeks ahead, "Fire and Blood" steps back to serve as a more traditional denouement, laying out the various threads which will be followed into a second season. Rightly treating the fate of Ned Stark as the season's climax, it seeks to explore the scenario that Mirri Maz Duur lays out to Dany early in the episode: what is the worth of each of these characters and these storylines in light of recent events? It's a moment where the show actually has to step forward and proclaim its identity in order to convince the skeptics that this is a show worth watching, and to convince the believers that their faith has not been misplaced as the show transitions into the next stage of its narrative.
"Fire and Blood" doesn't beat around the bush: it shows its hand from its bloody opening to its fiery conclusion, laying out a pretty detailed framework for what the second season of the show will look like. However, it never feels like an artificial framework, and that sense of interpretation never disappears even as the storyline becomes less open-ended. Serving as a fitting bookend to what I personally feel was a very strong first season, "Fire and Blood" reinforces central themes and delivers on what matters most: reminding us why these characters are following the path they're on, and informing us why we want to follow that path next season.
Tagged as A Song of Ice and Fire, Analysis, Arya, Catelyn, Cersei, D.B. Weiss, Daenerys, Dany, David Benioff, Direwolves, Dragons, Emilia Clarke, Episode 10, Fire and Blood, George R.R. Martin, Grand Maester Pycelle, HBO, Jaime, Joffrey, Jon Snow, Khal Drogo, King in the North, Lancel, Marillion, Mirri Maz Duur, Night's Watch, Renly, Review, Robb, Sansa, Season 1, Season Finale, Sexposition, Shaggydog, Sophie Turner, Stannis, Tyrion, Tywin, Westeros
Is this a great song? Yes. Does Kelly sing it well? Also yes. But "You Get What You Give" just isn't as good withou… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 hours ago