The Council Has Spoken!! Our Watcher's Council Results – 03/06/15
Jon McNaughton on Obama's Foreign Policy…
With thanks to Moonbattery, NoisyRoom would like to add to the Weasel festivities this week:
The Council has spoken, the votes have been cast and the results are in for this week's Watcher's Council match-up.
Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. – George Orwell's 1984
Whoever controls the media, controls the mind. – Jim Morrison of The Doors
The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses. – Malcolm X
This week's winning essay, The Noisy Room's – Net Neutrality: "Young fool … Only now, at the end, do you understand", takes apart the Obama dominated FCC's plans to 'regulate' the Internet and turn it into something unrecognizable. Here's a slice:
We keep hearing, from the saviors in Washington, DC, how government regulation is the answer and how "evil monopolies" (created, incidentally, by other government regulations) are responsible for all our trials and tribulations and the "fundamental unfairness" of the Internet as she is currently wrote.
Obligatory movie quote:
"No. No government. I know those people. Absolutely not." – Col. Ira Kane
Yeah, it's a movie. It's also absolutely right.
The founder of Broadcast.com, Mark Cuban, has recently been vociferous in his opposition to so-called "Net Neutrality" with his most recent public appearance on the subject in an interview where he breaks it down. His effort to "plain-language" the argument notwithstanding, and frankly, it's a subject that should not be oversimplified, he laid out the unintended consequences dominoes and how this "everything is equal" push plays out in terms of common services.
Now, you might want to shrug Mark Cuban off as "some rich guy who owns a sports team" and clearly that's being done a lot, but don't forget how he got rich: he pioneered live broadcasting over the Internet. He's not some political hack, evil cable company exec, or mushy thinking me-too "fairness uber alles" flag waver. He is, for once, someone who knows what the hell he's talking about.
Net Neutrality, like so many political labels, is a "fair sounding" name that hides the actual motives and consequences of the real world implementations we will experience after the seemingly inevitable adoption of this latest government overreach.
It won't be fair. It won't be optimum. And the right answer will never even be mentioned, never mind entertained: deregulate the cable and broadband space to eliminate the protected monopolies.
The broadband space needs more competition, not less; needs less regulation, not more. Companies like Google laying fiber? Cox, AT&T, Verizon and Comcast suddenly no longer have a free pass.
Otherwise? The cynical and dystopian view?
One of the unavoidable dominoes will be broad censorship. Once the deprioritization of broadcast packets leads to the epic traffic jam that will reduce the Web's US speeds to worse than those found in Europe, the government of the day will, once again, have to "save us" from this "unforseen" outcome and their clever plan will include limiting who can "legitimately" have bandwidth preferences, since clearly "legitimate" news outlets need to bypass the buffering jams that will afflict TV signalling and once dot-gov starts adjudicating who's a "real" news or other "essential" service, licensing will naturally follow, and then "standards" of what is "acceptable" traffic.
At which point, whichever political party is in power at that time will have the distinct advantage of licensing whomever they deem to be more politically correct in their eyes. "Neutrality" on the 'Net? Yeah, not so much.
We're in the hands of fools and corrupt bureaucrats. Last Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission held a faux meeting on open Internet rules and access to broadband Internet. Commissioner Ajit Pai made a statement before the FCC vote to take unprecedented control over the internet with a secret plan. Yes, secret. Secret as in no exposure to the public or Congress prior to its enactment. What follows is the transcript of his comments – in echoes of Obamacare, this had to pass before we could know what was in it. Except, they are still keeping it under wraps. It must be very, very bad indeed.
From Breitbart:
"The Wall Street Journal reports that it was developed through 'an unusual secretive effort inside the White House.' Indeed, White House officials, according to the Journal, functioned as a parallel version of the FCC. Their work led to the president's announcement in November of his plan for internet regulation, a plan which the report says blindsided the FCC and swept aside months of work by Chairman Wheeler toward a compromise. Now, of course, a few insiders were clued in about what was transpiring. Here's what a leader for the government-funded group Fight for the Future had to say, 'We've been hearing for weeks from our allies in D.C that the only thing that could stop FCC chairman Tom Wheeler from moving ahead with his sham proposal to gut net neutrality was if we could get the president to step in. So we did everything in our power to make that happen. We took the gloves off and played hard, and now we get to celebrate a sweet victory. Congratulations. what the press has called the parallel FCC at the White House opened its door to a plethora of special interest activists. Daily Kos, Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, Free Press, and Public Knowledge, just to name a few. Indeed, even before activists were blocking the chairman's driveway late last year, some of them had met with executive branch officials.
"But what about the rest of the American people? They certainly couldn't get White House meetings. They were shut out of the process altogether. They were being played for fools. And the situation didn't improve once the White House announced President Obama's plan, and 'asked' the FCC to implement it. The document in front of us today differs dramatically from the proposal that the FCC put out for comment last May, and it differs so dramatically that even zealous net neutrality advocates frantically rushed in, in recent days, to make last-minute filings, registering their concerns that the FCC might be going too far. Yet, the American people, to this day, have not been allowed to see President Obama's plan. It has remained hidden.
"Especially given the unique importance of the internet, Commissioner O'Rielly and I ask for the plan to be released to the public. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune and House of Representatives Chairman did the same. According to a survey last week by a respected democratic polling firm, 79% of the American people favored making the document public. Still, the FCC has insisted on keeping it behind closed doors. We have to pass President Obama's 317-page plan so the American people can find out what's in it. This isn't how the FCC should operate. We should be an independent agency making decisions in a transparent manner based on the law and the facts in the record.
"We shouldn't be a rubber stamp for political decisions made by the White House. And we should have released this plan to the public, solicited their feedback, incorporated that input into the plan, and then proceeded to a vote. There was no need for us to resolve this matter today. There is no immediate crisis in the internet marketplace that demands immediate action. now. The backers of the president's plan know this. But they also know that the details of this plan cannot stand up to the light of day. They know that the more the American people learn about it, the less they will like it. That is why this plan was developed behind closed doors at the White House. And that is why the plan has remained hidden from public view.
"These aren't my only concerns. Even a cursory look at the plan reveals glaring legal plans that are sure to mire the agency in the muck of litigation for a long, long time. but rather than address them today, I will reserve them for my written statement. At the beginning of this proceeding, I quoted Google's former CEO, who once said, the internet is the first thing that humanity has built, that humanity doesn't understand. This proceeding makes it abundantly clear that the FCC still doesn't get it. but the American people clearly do. The proposed government regulation of the internet has awakened a sleeping giant. I'm optimistic we'll look back on today's vote as a temporary deviation from the bipartisan consensus that's served us so well. I don't know whether this plan will be vacated by a court, reversed by Congress, or overturned by a future commission, But I do believe its days are numbered. For all of those reasons, I dissent."
More at the link.
In our non-Council category, the winner was Jim DeMint in the Daily Signal with If Not Now … When? Will the GOP Majority Ever Stand for Anything? submitted by Ask Marion. As the man who, along with Sarah Palin, was pretty much responsible for the victory in the 2010 midterms that resurrected the GOP from the grave, De Mint is definitely in a position to look at the Republicans in Congress today and wonder if they stand for anything.
After lying to their supporters again in 2014 about ow they would dismantle President Obama's radical agenda and being rewarded with majorities in both houses of Congress, they've reneged on everything they said they would do at election time. Can they ever be trusted again? Do read it.
Here are this week's full results:
Council Winners
*First place with 2 2/3 votes! – The Noisy Room – Net Neutrality: "Young fool … Only now, at the end, do you understand."
Second place with 2 1/3 votes – Joshuapundit – A Speech, A Choice And A Challenge
Third place with 2 votes – The Right Planet – The White House Prayer Deception
Fourth place with 1 2/3 votes – The Independent Sentinel – Breaking…WH Plans to Develop a Country Within a Country of 15 Million "New Americans"
Fifth place *t* with 1 vote – The Glittering Eye – The Devil in the Details
Fifth place *t* with 1 vote – VA Right! – Republicans Betray the Voters – AGAIN
Sixth place *t* with 2/3 vote – The Razor – What If… Shirley MacLaine is Just an Idiot?
Sixth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Rhymes With Right – The Faux Outrage Of The Fatuous Left And The Fabulist Media
Non-Council Winners
*First place with 2 votes! – Jim DeMint/The Daily Signal – If Not Now … When? Will the GOP Majority Ever Stand for Anything? submitted by Ask Marion
Second place with 1 2/3 votes – T. Greer/Zenpundit – Guest post, T Greer: A civilization is at stake here submitted by The Glittering Eye
Third place *t* with 1 1/3 votes – Ace Of Spades HQ – It's Over: Boehner, Boehner's Establishment Allies, and Democrats Unite to Fund Obama's Executive Amnesty submitted by Rhymes with Right
Third place *t* with 1 1/3 votes – Breitbart – New Documents Blow Lid Off Obama/Clinton Benghazi Scandal submitted by VA Right!
Third place *t* with 1 1/3 votes – Breach Bang Clear – The New Definition Of Trauma submitted by Bookworm Room
Fourth place *t* with 1 vote – The Daily Beast – Iraq's Attack Against ISIS Catches U.S. 'By Surprise' submitted by GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
Fourth place *t* with 1 vote – Robert Joseph, William Tobey/NRO – Iran: A Bad Deal Is (Much) Worse than No Deal submitted by The Watcher
Fifth place *t* with 2/3 votes – Andrew McCarthy/NRO – Bring Back the Bush Doctrine – with One Addition submitted by The Noisy Room
Fifth place *t* with 2/3 votes – Maggie's Notebook – Defense Intelligence Told Not to Update Obama on Bin Laden Documents submitted by The Independent Sentinel
Fifth place *t* with 2/3 votes – Kyle MizoKami/War Is Boring – I Built An AR-15 In My Kitchen – Without Telling The Government submitted by The Watcher
Sixth place with 1/3 vote – America – The National Catholic Review – The Catholic Pagan: 10 Questions for Camille Paglia submitted by The Razor
See you next week!
Make sure to tune in every Monday for the Watcher's Forum and every Tuesday morning, when we reveal the week's nominees for Weasel of the Week!
And remember, every Wednesday, the Council has its weekly contest with the members nominating two posts each, one written by themselves and one written by someone from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council. The votes are cast by the Council and the results are posted on Friday morning.
It's a weekly magazine of some of the best stuff written in the blogosphere and you won't want to miss it… or any of the other fantabulous Watcher's Council content.
And don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter… 'cause we're cool like that, y'know?
Tagged bloggers, Politics, The Watcher's Council, Watcher of Weasels
WATCH: Trevor Loudon confronts Socialist Ed Balls at #SCTeaParty18 (video)
Our Weasel Of The Week! – 08/27/15
Why Mitt Romney Didn't Double Down on Benghazi
Antifa Professor At NYU Is The One Doxxing ICE Employees
Mandela Lied but Communism Never Died
The Russian Bear Moves In Next Door
When Evangelicals Become Useful Idiots for Islamism
"They Believed" by Sons of Alice
← Media Cheerleading for Obamacare Victory at Supreme Court
White House Takes Out Two Democrat Critics of its Insane Iran Deal in One Week: Hillary and Menendez →