BCS Review Series: 2001, Nebraska Fiasco Rocks BCS
Part 4 of a series: Over the next few weeks, I will be reviewing each of the 16 seasons since the Bowl Championship Series came into existence in 1998. Here is a look back at who got lucky, who got robbed, what could've been, what should've been and other controversies of the day. The series will appear throughout December and January.
Part 1: 1998, A New Beginning for College Football
Part 2: 1999, FSU Ends Michael Vick's Quest for Perfection
Part 3: 2000, FSU-Miami Sows Seeds of Controversy
If the BCS was shaken by the 2000 controversy, then it was rocked by an earthquake in 2001.
Heading into the final weeks of the regular season, it appeared that a Miami-Nebraska showdown in the Rose Bowl would be inevitable. After Nebraska's 20-10 win over previously unbeaten Oklahoma in late October, the 'Canes and Huskers were ranked 1-2 for the next four consecutive weeks, with non-BCS Brigham Young the only other unbeaten team.
Then a series of upsets changed everything.
Heading into their final regular-season game, the Huskers still needed a victory in Boulder to clinch the Big 12 North against two-loss Colorado. But the Buffaloes didn't comply, and thrashed Nebraska, 62-36, in a game that wasn't even that close. Nebraska tumbled to No. 6 in the polls and its national title aspirations seemingly squashed.
After Nebraska's loss, Florida claimed the all-important No. 2 spot. The Gators just needed to beat Tennessee to secure a berth in the SEC championship game. Annually played in the third week of September, the Florida-Tennessee game in 2001 was postponed because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Vols surprised Florida with a 34-32 victory, in what turned out to be Steve Spurrier's final regular-season game as Gators coach.
The victory catapulted Tennessee from No. 6 to No. 2 in the BCS standings after No. 4 Colorado upset No. 3 Texas in the Big XII title game. Now all the Vols had to do was beat three-loss LSU in the SEC title game to secure their second BCS title game appearance in four years.
In the meantime, left on the sideline seething was Oregon. The Ducks, with their only defeat to two-loss Stanford, were No. 3 in both polls. Yet, they were ranked only No. 5 in the BCS standings, behind two-loss Colorado, who had been beaten by Fresno State and also Texas in the regular season. The Buffs, after winning the rematch against the Longhorns, had their issue, too: Somehow, they were ranked No. 4 in the BCS, behind the Nebraska team that had been idle since being annihilated in Boulder.
The BCS would've dodged a bullet if Tennessee could just take care of business against Nick Saban's LSU Tigers, who had been beaten in Knoxville earlier in the season. But LSU didn't oblige, pulling out a 31-20 victory in the SEC title game, completing the frenzied final three weeks of the season with one more upset.
So who was going to play undefeated Miami? Oregon, now No. 2 in both polls, seemed to have the strongest argument. Colorado, with an impressive late-season run but two losses, thought it deserved a shot, too. The team that really shouldn't be in the discussion was Nebraska, which had snuck back up to No. 4 after the spate of late-season upsets.
But it was Nebraska that claimed the No. 2 spot in the final BCS standings, edging out Colorado by five-hundredth (.05) of a percentage point. Oregon, with a low computer average and hampered by its strength-of-schedule rating, was a distant fourth and never had a chance.
The Buffaloes howled for weeks after narrowly losing out. But the truth is that they were even that close to Nebraska only because of the new "quality win" component, added after the 2000 season as make-good for Miami's snub. Had the 2000 formula been applied, Colorado would've been fourth, behind Nebraska by nearly two full points and also Oregon as well.
At the end, the Ducks were really the aggrieved party, and they proved it by destroying Colorado, 38-16, in the Fiesta Bowl. Miami finished its undefeated season in the Rose Bowl with a ho-hum 34-14 victory over Nebraska, universally disparaged as being undeserving. While the Hurricanes celebrated their national championship, the BCS was sent back to the drawing board once again.
Complete Final BCS Standings
Rank Team Poll Avg. Computer SoS Loss Q-W BCS
1 Miami 1 1.00 18 0 -0.1 2.62
2 Nebraska 4 2.17 14 1 -0.5 7.23
3 Colorado 3 4.50 2 2 -2.3 7.28
4 Oregon 2 4.83 31 1 -0.4 8.67
Using post-2003 formula: 1. Miami, 2. Oregon, 3. Nebraska, 4. Colorado. (Oregon would've been a comfortable No. 2, and there would've been little controversy)
Using 1998-2000 formula: 1. Miami, 2. Nebraska, 3. Oregon, 4. Colorado. (Nebraska would've been well ahead of Oregon)
Likely four-team playoff: Miami vs. Nebraska; Oregon vs. Colorado.
With a slew of upsets in conference championship games, these four teams actually stood far apart from the rest of the pack, even if Nebraska failed to win its division. No. 5 Florida also failed to win its division after losing to Tennessee in the aforementioned SEC East showdown.
Other than Nebraska getting into the national championship game in the Rose Bowl, not really. (But that's like saying 'other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?'.) The only other one-loss teams from major conferences, Illinois (Big Ten) and Maryland (ACC), were both throttled in BCS bowl games. No. 5 Florida was the only at-large selection, and as it turned out, sent out coach Spurrier to the NFL with a 56-23 rout of Maryland at the Orange Bowl.
2001 BCS Bowl Matchups
Game Score Attendance TV Rating
Rose Bowl* #1 Miami 37, #2 Nebraska 14 93,781 13.9
Fiesta Bowl #4 Oregon 38, #3 Colorado 16 74,118 11.3
Orange Bowl #5 Florida 56, #10 Maryland 23 73,640 9.5
Sugar Bowl #13 LSU 47, #8 Illinois 34 77,688 8.6
BCS formula review: Wes Colley (of Colley Matrix) and Peter Wolfe were added to the computer ratings, replacing the New York Times and Richard Dunkel. The move ostensibly was to lessen the impact of margin of victory in computer rankings. Of the eight ratings for each team, the highest and lowest were thrown out and the remainder averaged.
Also, a "quality win" component was added to the team's final BCS score total, in response to Miami's being snubbed in 2000. This scheme called for teams to receive bonus points by beating other teams in the final BCS top 15. As a result, Colorado's late-season wins over Nebraska and Texas gave it a boost of 2.3 points, nearly knocking Nebraska out of the No. 2 spot.
Final analysis: The 2001 mess probably should've been a wake-up call for the BCS to completely revamp its formula. Yet, the powers-that-be continued to tinker with knee-jerk and piecemeal "fixes" that inevitably resulted in another controversy. The next season brought a big relief—through no credit to the BCS system—but the calm would prove short-lived.
Posted by Samuel Chi at 7:02 AM
Labels: BCS, BCS Years in Review, Colorado, Miami, Nebraska, Oregon
The Guru on Facebook
Follow The Guru on Twitter
More From Guru
BCS Standings (1998-2013)
Conference Alignment
BCS Resource Center
Associated Press Poll
USA Today Coaches Poll
Harris Interactive Poll
Computer Rankings
Anderson & Hester
Richard Billingsley
Colley Matrix
Kenneth Massey
Jeff Sagarin
Peter Wolfe
Playoff Guru Resources
All-Time Database
All-Time Scores
All-Time Win Percentage
BCS Fan Poll
BCS Know How
Bear Talk
eTrueSports
Fervent Fandom
Gators First
Minor League Town
Official BCS
The Wiz of Odds
Wikipedia BCS
Blog Archive August 2015 (1) May 2015 (2) January 2015 (3) December 2014 (6) November 2014 (9) October 2014 (5) September 2014 (5) August 2014 (1) July 2014 (1) June 2014 (2) May 2014 (7) April 2014 (5) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (6) January 2014 (12) December 2013 (15) November 2013 (16) October 2013 (15) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (2) May 2013 (1) January 2013 (5) December 2012 (9) November 2012 (12) October 2012 (13) September 2012 (12) August 2012 (2) June 2012 (1) May 2012 (1) April 2012 (1) January 2012 (2) December 2011 (4) November 2011 (9) October 2011 (11) September 2011 (5) August 2011 (2) May 2011 (1) April 2011 (1) January 2011 (2) December 2010 (6) November 2010 (14) October 2010 (11) September 2010 (9) August 2010 (4) January 2010 (2) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (16) October 2009 (18) September 2009 (17) August 2009 (15) July 2009 (4) April 2009 (1) March 2009 (1) January 2009 (4) December 2008 (8) November 2008 (18) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (15) August 2008 (6) July 2008 (3) June 2008 (2) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (1) February 2008 (1) January 2008 (5) December 2007 (4) November 2007 (17) October 2007 (10) September 2007 (8) August 2007 (1) December 2006 (1) November 2006 (2) October 2006 (3)
2009 BCS Standings (32)
AP Poll (7)
Appalachian State (2)
Automatic Qualifier (7)
Baylor (11)
BCS (433)
BCS Bowls (21)
BCS Debate (76)
BCS Formula (35)
BCS News (9)
BCS Projections (68)
BCS Resource Center (1)
BCS Revenue (11)
BCS Top 10 (15)
BCS Years in Review (18)
BEST OF THE GURU (53)
Big 12 (74)
Big East (29)
Big Ten (82)
Bleacher Report (1)
Blogpoll (66)
Bo Schembechler (2)
Boise State (75)
Boston College (7)
Bowl Predictions (7)
BYU (28)
Cal (10)
Cal State Fullerton (2)
CFP (63)
Charleston Southern (1)
Charlie Weis (5)
Clemson (5)
Coaches Poll (18)
Coalition (9)
Conference USA (6)
Craig James (1)
Death to BCS (2)
DeSean Beasley (1)
East Carolina (3)
Fiesta Bowl (7)
Florida State (38)
Gator Bowl (1)
Gene Murphy (3)
Guest Column (5)
Guru's Rankings (3)
Harris Poll (13)
Heisman Trophy (2)
Holiday Bowl (1)
Humanitarian Bowl (1)
I-AA (5)
Jake Locker (1)
Jim Tressel (1)
June Jones (1)
Kansas State (15)
Lane Kiffin (1)
Live Blog (2)
LSU (69)
Mark Ingram (2)
Miami (Ohio) (1)
Michigan State (2)
Mike Gundy (1)
MWC (31)
Northern Illinois (3)
Notre Dame (68)
Ohio State (81)
Oklahoma State (13)
Orange Bowl (8)
Pac-10 (90)
Penn State (12)
Pete Carroll (2)
Realignment (8)
Report Card (3)
Rich Rodriguez (3)
Rose Bowl (25)
San Diego State (2)
SB Nation (11)
SEC (158)
Selection Committee (14)
Standings (19)
Strength of Schedule (SoS) (16)
T. Boone Pickens (1)
TCU (50)
Ten Years of BCS (21)
Texas A+M (2)
Texas Tech (16)
Toby Gerhart (1)
Troubleshooting BCS (2)
Tulane (1)
Urban Meyer (2)
USC (106)
Virginia Tech (10)
Samuel Chi
The Guru is a journalist who takes time from his busy schedule to provide this important public service. And of course, the Guru is so well-rounded that he has interests beyond the gridiron and crystal ball. Check out his other adventures -- after first buckle your seat belt.
About the Guru
Contact the Guru
Guru in the Media
View my other sites:
The Berlinzoo
CSF Baseball
RealClearSports
A Production of SC Publications, All Rights Reserved © 2013 BCS Guru