Tag: misogyny
Reclaim The Night – 16 year old Lily speaks out about the on-line harassment of young women.
This week I am proud to have been given permission to publish an extract from one of the speeches given at yesterday's Reclaim The Night rally in Sydney; this was given by 16 year old high school student Lily. The event was part of what is now a world-wide protest movement by women against sexual violence.
I am awed by Lily's strength in speaking out in this way, and encouraged by the incredible grass-roots feminist group she has helped establish at her school.
May she inspire us all to work even harder for, and with, our girls. And may we all seek to create even more opportunities for young women to be given a platform from which they can share their experiences too.
Good evening! Thank you so much for having me. I'm Lily, I'm 16 years old and currently starting Year 12. I've spent a good amount of time with technology in my life and tonight I'm going to be speaking about the treatment of women on the internet today, as I see it and know it, and the experiences that other women have had online.
Collective Voice – High School students fighting sexism.
I'd like to start by giving a shout out to the feminist group at my school, Collective Voice, who are here today (there's the banner)! In 2010 Collective Voice was started by our teacher Ms Fajou, in response to a lack of discussion with our peers about the sexism teens receive from the media, and each other. We discuss what feminism means to us – how we feel about body image, violence against women, homophobia, politics. We run campaigns at school encouraging girls to reject "beauty standards", making posters and signing petitions.
We also have a very active Facebook page that we use to share videos, articles and current events connected with feminism. Here we share discuss issues that matter to us as young women. It's awesome. We are building skills of productive dialogue and knowledge and opinion, which is powerful. One thing that we're working against with Collective Voice is the widespread level of online sexism; a lot of online spaces have been claimed by a boys' club of obscenity, anonymity and oppression.
I believe it is important, vitally important, to acknowledge that what happens online is still valid despite not being 'in real life'. The attitudes and beliefs you encounter, the harassment you face, and the sexism which manifests is just as real online as offline. Just like in workplaces, boardrooms or any other social environments, online spaces can be made to feel unsafe and threatening. And when women perceive a space to be unsafe or threatening they are less likely to be able to participate equally in that space. If we stepped into a public space or workplace that was adorned with unavoidably graphic pornographic posters, where the people who you approached yelled hate speech at you or harassed you, where you were belittled or denied equal treatment due to your sex, gender, orientation or opinion – it would not be acceptable.
About a month ago, I attended my year 11 social. I had a good time and goofed around a bit, as you do. A few days later I found a particular photo of myself from the social on Facebook; it had been commented on extensively. Over 10 boys and men who are still complete strangers to me commented freely on my appearance, they debated whether they would masturbate to it, they told me that my photo would haunt me for years to come, they openly, and unapologetically discussed what they imagined my genitalia would look like. They were supported by over 40 others, who had 'liked' their comments.
This isn't the first we've seen of Facebook acting as a medium for sexism and abuse, however. Notable additions have been "Punch a slut in the face day" (a group set up in a NSW school by boys who then went on to physically assault girls they perceived as promiscuous), "Define statutory: pro-rape, anti-consent" (from the lovely lads at St Pauls college from Sydney University); "it's not rape if you yell surprise" and a swathe of pages titled with 'women in the kitchen jokes' in 2010. We saw the recent case of 'Root Rate', a page for young men to publically rate their sexual experiences with women, encouraging a lot of sexism and derogatory comments. Many of the contributors and the girls spoken about were underage.
Just two weeks ago, the world witnessed the case of Amanda Todd, a 15 year old girl who committed suicide after receiving extreme abuse online and in real time. Todd showed her breasts to a man online about 3 years earlier, and for this she was condemned by her peers and others. Before she committed suicide she posted a video online describing her story in detail.
Jarrah Hodge, who writes and educates on gender representations in media, politics and pop-culture, said, "(In the media commentary surrounding her case) there was no discussion of the pressure girls like Amanda experience to measure their worth through their sexual desirability. From her story it sounds like this man had the hallmarks of a predator—he tried to use her photos to blackmail her and yet she's the one who got blamed. This comes from the idea that it's up to girls and women to protect their purity at the same time as all their role models in the media say that you need to 'get a man' to be a complete person, that you need to be sexually attractive to be liked, appreciated, and valued. She said the guy she showed off to was telling her how beautiful she was. Given our culture that can be really tempting for a girl."
What is surprising is that sexist, oppressive behaviour online has become very mainstream, especially considering that women make up the larger proportion of users of social media!
Currently 64% of Facebook users are female as are 58% of Twitter users. In theory, online space is a woman's domain! And yet, online you receive 25 times as much abuse if you state that you are a woman or if your username is feminine…
…This is not a joke. This cannot be trivialised. What happens on the internet directly influences the way people behave in reality, and regardless how we interact with each other online is still a human interaction.
Of course, I am not the only person to speak out against the way women are objectified and men encouraged to degrade women online. There are numerous activists and online petitions targeting Reddit, Facebook and other forums.
It is how these efforts are responded to that perhaps gives us the most frightening insight of all.
Anita Sarkeesian has been running an online video series called Feminist Frequency since 2009, exploring and deconstructing pop culture in an accessible way. Sarkeesian makes video blogs (a form of blogging for which the medium is video, considered a form of internet television) analysing movies, TV shows, music videos – the things that influence us, and especially young people.
Her most recent project has been 'Tropes Vs. Women in Video Games', a 12 video project exploring the way women are represented in video games. During the making of it she has encountered unprecedented harassment. She writes:
"… a harassment campaign is being waged against me and has included attempts to get my accounts banned, a torrent of hate on YouTube, plus countless threats of violence, death, sexual assault and rape. As part of that intimidation effort the Wikipedia page about me was vandalized with misogynist language, pornography and racial slurs.This was not done by just one or two trolls but was a coordinated cyber mob style effort involving a whole gang working together."
So this is what it all comes down to. Sarkeesian, now backed by over 7000 donors, is breaking the rules of the male dominated gaming community with this project. Not only is she attacking the way women are treated in the games, but the way women are treated in the gaming community – there is no space for women to exist at the same level as men in a community which constantly sees them as objects…
…Now, don't get me wrong, the internet can be a lovely place. And the reason we all use it so much is because it has infinitely widened our ability to learn, communicate and create. The problem lies in dealing with issues of prejudice and offense – we just don't know how to effectively serve justice online.
All too often, the cry goes up that the internet is the problem.The problem never lies with the internet itself, the blame lies with wrongful attitudes and social acceptance of them.
There is no 'one size fits all' solution for solving inequality on the internet, just as there isn't one for 'reality'. But we, as women, do need to be strongly active. We need to take the knowledge and perspective we have and make it heard. The internet is a highly modern space filled with primitive ideals, and frankly, we're better than that.
So tonight we are here to reclaim the spaces we exist in and make them safe for all women! Let's include in that, the online space. And let's reclaim the right for all women to live free from violence, harassment, misogyny and abuse!
Life After Kyle
Today is International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, which is also commemorated by the White Ribbon Campaign.
White Ribbon recognises that men and boys need to to work towards eradicating the fact that one in three Australian women over the age of 15 have experienced physical or sexual violence at some time in their lives. Disability Discrimination Commissioner Innes summed up why this day is more than merely symbolic: "…it is a time to draw attention to this grave issue in our society. It is a time to ask men to ensure their actions make it clear they are against it, by speaking out about it and passing the important message – that there is no place for violence against women – onto their family and friends, particularly to other males." The White Ribbon Campaign encourages us to highlight the importance of respect for women and strive for attitudinal change; all it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
How fitting then that both mainstream and social media are abuzz with discussion over Kyle Sandiland's recent outburst against a female journalist. Sandilands named the journalist and said she was a "troll…a bullshit artist". He then commented on her appearance, mocking her hairdo and ranting: "You haven't got that much titty to be wearing that low cut a blouse. Watch your mouth girl, or I will hunt you down."
Using the hash tag #vilekyle, Tweets called for Austereo to sack him. An on-line petition urging sponsors to "ditch" Kyle attracted thousands of signatures. David Penberthy declared he finds him "…about as funny as the hole he has in his head where other people keep their brains" and branded him a "dictionary definition misogynist". Miranda Devine attempted to highlight how this "living, sagging embodiment of misogyny" was a sad indictment on a culture that has become increasingly toxic for boys and men: "We now have a generation of men brought up with rap music that celebrates violence to women while their own innocent maleness has been treated as a dirty little crime since boyhood." Whilst, in my discussion with Kerri-Anne, I argued that it is those around him, his co-host Jackie O, Austereo, and indeed the listening audience who must also be held responsible for allowing this man the elevated platform from which he can belittle, threaten and abuse:
It is my belief Kyle will go. He has proven himself to be not just a shock-jock but a liability. You may recall Charlie Sheen was forgiven for his atrocious behaviour towards women (in 2006, Sheen's then wife, Denise Richards, filed a restraining order against him, saying that Sheen had thrown chairs at her, pushed her, and threatened to kill her. In 2009, he made similar threats against his new wife, Brooke Mueller, while holding a knife to her throat. And in 2010 Sheen went on a violent rampage at the Plaza Hotel, allegedly verbally and physically abusing a prostitute he had hired for the night). It was only after Sheen turned on his producers that he was sacked.
But how can we ensure another Kyle, or another Sheen, does not emerge to replace those that have, fuelled by their own self-importance and fury, self-combusted?
And how do we deal with the many other men who are not so public in their abuse of women, and are not currently being held accountable?
The conversations need to be kept alive long after Sandilands has been silenced.
Claim back the music!
What is the soundtrack to your life? What music surrounded you in your most formative teen years? What song was playing when you first kissed, when you danced at your school formal, or when you broke loose and did a hairbrush solo in your bedroom?
As a child of the eighties Madonna rocked my world and shocked my parents by revealing she felt like a virgin being touched for the very first time. Chrissy Amphlett sung of desperation and lust. These were wild women who fully embraced their sexuality, but they were nobodies "bitch" or "'ho." Madonna may have been a "material girl" but she didn't need a pimp. These girls all ran their own show. The men around them looked on with respect or desire – perhaps even with fear, but rarely with contempt.
Song lyrics have always been filled with sexual innuendo and pushed societies boundaries but this in-your-face mainstream misogyny is relatively new. And now- thanks to large plasma screens in shopping centers, bowling alleys and bars and night clubs – it is inescapable. It's hate and porn, all the time.
A 2008 report entitled "Ambivalent Sexism and Misogynistic Rap Music: Does Exposure to Eminem Increase Sexism?", published recently in the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, concluded that it is unlikely that hearing lyrics in a song creates sexist attitudes that do not previously exist. Based on their findings, the head researcher Assistant Professor Cobb went on to state," There is not much evidence in our study to support an argument in favour of censorship." But haven't these researchers missed the point? Sexist attitudes may not have increased amongst their male and female subjects, but how did the female subjects feel about themselves and their bodies after being exposed to one of the songs they actually used in the study, Eminem's song "Kill You". The lyrics include:
"(AH!) Slut, you think I won't choke no whore
'til the vocal cords don't work in her throat no more?!
(AH!) These mother #!!! are thinking I'm playing
Thinking I'm saying the shit cause I'm thinking it just to be saying it
(AH!) Put your hands down bitch, I ain't gonna shoot you
I'm gonna pull YOU to this bullet, and put it through you
(AH!) Shut up slut, you're causing too much chaos
Just bend over and take it like a slut, OK Ma?"
A British study found that watching video clips featuring skinny, semi naked gyrating women ( in other words, watching 99% of all music clips) for just 10 minutes was enough to reduce teenage girls body satisfaction with their body shape by 10 per cent. Dr Michael Rich, spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics Media Matters campaign has gone so far as to state that exposure to misogynist music that portrays violence against women and sexual coercion as normal may effect other areas of young peoples lives and make it more difficult for them to know what is normal in a relationship.
Even the strongest of us admit to feeling less than they were after a dose of the Pussycat Dolls and Eminem – there is undeniably a nasty after taste. Yet look around, these sounds and their associated film clips are the very fodder we now give our children as the soundtrack to their youth. The Pussycat Dolls "Don't cha?" includes the lyrics "I know you want it…I know you should be on with me…don't cha wish your girlfriend was hot like me, don't cha wish your girlfriend was raw like me?". This anthem to the sisterhood featured on Hits for kids Volume 3 this Christmas, alongside songs by Hi 5 and Guy Sebastian. Alvin the Chipmunk sings "Don't cha" in his made for the pre-school set holiday film release. Markets are filled with junior Eminem tracksuits and gangster accessories for the budding pimp. Am I the only one who cringes when I see small girls shaking it to "My Humps"?
[kml_flashembed movie="http://au.youtube.com/v/CXKxs8Ge_9g" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
Rhinna is currently at number 1 on our music charts with her song "Don't Stop The Music" – I agree. I love music. I'm not after censorship, just commonsense. And awareness. Would it be asking too much if there could be a day set aside to celebrate positive portrayal of women on music and film clips? A day where we didn't have to keep our hand on the radio dial as we drive the kids to school for fear that they were going to have to listen to lyrics about yet another "Nasty Gal"?
Five years ago if you had suggested we needed Earth Hour, an hour where we all turned off the lights to remind ourselves to be mindful of power consumption and our impact on the planet, you would have been thought a radical environmental extremist. Yet as things literally heated up, the lights all went out. How much hotter do things need to get on our airwaves and on our TV sets? I suspect society will also agree we have now indeed reached tipping point and will embrace a day that seeks to claim back the music.
Smart radio stations will jump on board. Overseas, special days devoted to the positive portrayal of women in music have pushed radio stations ratings through the roof. In Boston "Radio Log", a station set up to promote positive portrayals of black women and inspire open phone conversations around relationships, has received nothing but good press. Radio stations should show leadership and live up to their responsibilities of meeting societies ethical and moral standards.
And as companies madly chase the female dollar, surely keeping women happy and showing them, and their daughters, respect can only be a smart and strategic marketing move?
Money doesn't just talk – it sings too.
P.S I have asked my colleagues at Women's Forum Australia and Kids Free 2B Kids to join me in calling for a national day that reclaims the music for women. I am hoping we might hear from a few more like minded people who want to celebrate women through song, not denegrate them – would also love the media to get behind us. Any takers?
P.S.S How infuriating is this song from the "Bom Chicka Wah Wah's"? Unilever promote HIGHLY degrading portrayals of women with their brand Lynx (a brand that targets teen boys) whilst attempting to take their other key brand Dove in to our schools to sponsor self esteem programs for teenagers! "Body Think" may be a fabulous program and serves a real need – bravo the Butterfly Foundation for managing this – BUT when Unilver ( Dove and Lynx) also pushes these "girls gone wild" destructive messages at our young people I say NOT GOOD ENOUGH! Until Unilver cleans up its act and starts to show it genuinely cares about young women – and does not just choose to act responsibly when it suits them for the sake of promoting a particular brand – I'm boycotting all their products.
[kml_flashembed movie="http://au.youtube.com/v/B7evC55NU8I" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
And if that wasn't bad enough – how about the lack of respect shown towards female teachers in this ad? Her student's scent reduces her to singing porn music.
[kml_flashembed movie="http://au.youtube.com/v/6gbl5QsVs5M" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
Want to get really angry? Check out the "web site they tried to ban" – The Lynx Effect. Compare it to the web site promoting Dove's Campaign for Real Beauty – SAME PARENT COMPANY. Grrrrrr….
LOVE this Youtube clip by Rye Clifton that exposes the inherent contradiction in Unilver's marketing onslaught (in the USA Lynx is called Axe):
[kml_flashembed movie="http://au.youtube.com/v/SwDEF-w4rJk" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
LOVE that it caused a stir too…we need to be critical of all the dangerous and mixed messages that our young people are being exposed to.
[kml_flashembed movie="http://au.youtube.com/v/dRNbZQ7K3vo" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
The comments here are MUST READS…