Prorogation: Has Johnson even bothered to ask the Queen if she'll allow it?
It's "duper's delight" yet again: It seems Boris Johnson thinks he can fool the Queen into giving him a free Party Election Broadcast. Wouldn't she rather get her reserve powers out and sack him, instead?
Boris Johnson is planning to prorogue Parliament again next week, according to the political correspondents on the mainstream news. But they've been very quiet about whether the Queen will let him.
I made the point a couple of days ago that he brought exactly no new policies to the Conservative conference, yet now he is saying he wants to shut down Parliament for a further three debating days – on top of the 10 or more that were lost in the illegal prorogation – and re-open it with a Queen's Speech detailing a new legislative programme. Is he delusional?
Private Eye certainly seems to believe Her Majesty is likely to cast a jaundiced eye over any future proposals from the man we call BoJob.
According to Beastrabban, "The magazine's 'Court Circular' … covers the fall-out from Lady Hale's judgement, including the Queen's immense displeasure at hearing that the judges concluded that sovereignty lay with parliament and the orders written in her own hand were absolutely valueless. But she is also angry with Dictator J. Peasemold Johnson for not defending her in this fiasco. The mag's correspondent, 'Flunkey', writes
"Johnson's phone call with Brenda later on Judgment Day was similarly perplexing. He had part-blustered, part-charmed Brenda into believing his vision of a prorogational paradise and presented her with legal opinions to back up his case. But lawyers can be found to argue that black is white if someone is paying them to. Brenda bowed to Johnson's demands because she had no choice. But it is the job of prime ministers to protect a monarch who has no voice, and that is what Johnson failed to do. Worse, he didn't even try very hard. The palace had assumed that Johnson's phone call, with officials listening in on both sides, would consist of an apology and a request that she return to London to accept his resignation. But no. Despite briefings to the contrary from Downing Street, Johnson merely told her he "deeply and sincerely" regretted the supreme court's decision… and that was it.
"Things look set to change now that the Supremes have sung. The palace will not indulge Johnson so readily in future. A normal state opening of parliament this month has been almost impossible: what if Lady Hale and her colleagues were to conclude that the Queen's Speech, too, was written in invisible ink? Private audiences between Brenda and Johnson may become not so private, with suggestions they should be recorded in some form and stored in the archives just in case. And it is possible that a very reluctant Brenda might be talked into using her untested reserve powers to act in a crisis by dissolving parliament or sacking the prime minister."
And then there's this, from The Independent: If a Queen's Speech is made within weeks of an expected general election, will it not assume the characteristics of a Party Political Broadcast for the Johnson government?
After the prorogation fiasco, Her Majesty is unlikely to take kindly to that!
The article states: "Boris Johnson will be using the Queen 'to make a Conservative Party political broadcast' if he launches a new session of parliament just weeks before a general election, a constitutional expert is warning.
"The prime minister is being urged not to 'further abuse her position' – after the embarrassment of the Queen's signature being used to shut down parliament before being declared unlawful by the Supreme Court.
"Mr Johnson's new plan is to prorogue parliament for just a few days, to allow a Queen's Speech on 14 October when the monarch will set out his flagship domestic legislation amid huge pomp and ceremony."
It quotes Professor Robert Hazell of the constitution unit at University College London as follows: "The Queen's Speech will be not so much the government announcing the legislative programme for the next session, but more of an election manifesto.
"The Queen will have been used to make a Conservative Party political broadcast.
"It would bring more embarrassment to the Queen, dragging her again into political controversy.
"Boris Johnson has already caused the greatest constitutional controversy of her reign; he should not further abuse her position."
He added something that the rest of us have suspected for some time: "This would be the first Queen's Speech when the government had no real intention of introducing the bills it had just announced, because it hoped that, within weeks, parliament would be dissolved for an early election."
So those funding promises on the NHS and all the other services BoJob and his cronies promised to boost really were examples of "duper's delight" and they had no intention of fulfilling them.
Put it all together and, if I were in the Monarch's position, I would be very nervous about agreeing to anything this man wants. He has proved himself to be uninterested in preserving the reputation of any of the UK's constitutional pillars – and there is also a suggestion that his real purpose may be to make money for a shady group of backers at the expense of the entire nation.
Will the Queen really allow herself to be brought down by the antics of this liar?
This entry was posted in Conservative Party, Parliament, People, Politics, Queen and tagged Boris Johnson, Brenda, broadcast, dismiss, election, Elizabeth, II, Mike Sivier, Party, political, power, Private Eye, prorogation, prorogue, Queen, Queen's speech, reserve, sack, Vox on October 4, 2019 by Mike Sivier.
← Trigger ballots to decide if Phillips has to fight to remain an MP READ: Universal Credit and its direct causal links to longer NHS waits, higher council tax and more rough sleepers … – Speye Joe →
3 thoughts on "Prorogation: Has Johnson even bothered to ask the Queen if she'll allow it?"
trev October 4, 2019 at 7:56 pm
It really is beyond the pale. Boris has brought Politics to a new low, and that's saying something.
Bill Waghorn October 4, 2019 at 10:35 pm
I take your point that the Queen's Speech would be a party political broadcast. But you do not make what I consider an even stronger point, that the Queen's Speech would be a lie. We accept that governments are not guaranteed to do what they promise, but to ask the Queen to give voice to promises which CANNOT be kept is to ask her to accept that she is just a cipher, a highly paid actor who takes no responsibility for the lines she utters. I would prefer her to know that she is the ultimate guardian of our democracy, for use in emergency only, to protect us from dictatorship. She HAS to reject his request. Otherwise the monarchy itself is in danger.
hugosmum70 October 6, 2019 at 2:07 pm
I may not be the Queen but if i was in her position, i would simply not turn up for the Queens speech. then the day after give him his marching orders. but then again I am a stubborn old lady who hates being backed up into a corner by anyone. then again, the Queen too is an even older lady than i am. i do so hope she too has a stubborness so many older people possess. I do so hope she does this.