Politics|Ringleader of Democratic Rebels Softens Tone on Pelosi
Ringleader of Democratic Rebels Softens Tone on Pelosi
Representative Nancy Pelosi has been holding a series of private sessions to wear down her critics and win support from her detractors.CreditCreditErin Schaff for The New York Times
By Julie Hirschfeld Davis
WASHINGTON — The ringleader of a group of rebellious Democrats pushing to deny Representative Nancy Pelosi the speaker's gavel in the new Congress appeared to soften his opposition on Monday, calling for negotiations in the clearest signal to date that Ms. Pelosi's detractors have failed to thwart her steady march to the top post.
Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, who helped spearhead a letter last week in which 16 Democrats said it was time for Ms. Pelosi to stand aside, said that his effort was "bigger than her," as Democratic aides aligned with him said that some of the defectors were searching for a deal that would ultimately allow them to vote for her.
"Leader Pelosi wants to boil this down to a personal argument, but this is so much bigger than her," Mr. Moulton said in a statement. "It's about the entire, stagnant, three-person leadership team and having a serious conversation about promoting leaders who reflect the future of our caucus."
His change in tone reflected the success of Ms. Pelosi's efforts to grind down her opponents through a mix of deft deal-making and quiet campaigning, which has already prompted public reversals from two Democrats and led a third to suggest he might ultimately vote for her.
It was also a stark acknowledgment, two days before Democrats meet behind closed doors to choose their leaders, that nobody in their ranks has been willing to directly challenge Ms. Pelosi, a 78-year-old Californian who has led her party for 15 years.
The same is true for the other Democrats who are seeking to keep the No. 2 and No. 3 positions they have held for more than a decade, Representative Steny H. Hoyer, 79, of Maryland, and Representative James E. Clyburn, 78, of South Carolina.
Mr. Moulton's call for negotiation with Ms. Pelosi left open the possibility that he and like-minded Democrats who have pushed for new leadership might be willing to back her in exchange for the promise of a fresh face in a lower-ranking leadership position, or a commitment from Ms. Pelosi to step aside in the next year or two to make way for a younger generation. She has called herself a "transitional figure," a comment some have interpreted as a sign that she does not intend to stay in Congress beyond 2020, although she recently explained that she viewed all leaders as transitional.
And such a compromise does not appear to be in the offing, at least not yet. Matt Corridoni, a spokesman for Mr. Moulton, said that Ms. Pelosi had not reached out to Mr. Moulton to discuss the coming leadership elections, and a senior Democratic aide said he had yet to request such a discussion.
The apparent weakening of resolve among Ms. Pelosi's foes came as a separate coalition of nine House Democrats, dismayed by partisan gridlock, threatened to withhold support for Ms. Pelosi unless she backed an overhaul of the rules.
The demands of those Democrats, members of a bipartisan coalition calling itself the Problem Solvers Caucus, put another wrinkle in Ms. Pelosi's effort to win the speakership, a painstaking campaign she has undertaken in the wake of Democrats' midterm election victories that has involved trying to put down a mini-rebellion among her longtime foes and newcomers demanding change. The preliminary test will be when Democrats meet on Wednesday to cast secret ballots for their leaders.
But the ultimate verdict will not come until January, when the new Congress must elect a speaker on the House floor. The threat of a leadership fight has given rank-and-file Democrats a tantalizing opportunity to air their grievances and make demands in the hopes of winning concessions from Ms. Pelosi, who has said she is certain she will have enough votes to reclaim the speaker's gavel.
"For us, our rules proposal isn't about changing leadership; it's about changing a system that stymies the will of the common-sense majority," the group said in a statement on Monday, adding that its proposals would "help spur immediate action on health care, immigration and infrastructure."
The group is essentially asking Ms. Pelosi and the incoming Democratic leadership to fundamentally alter the procedures of the House, where the majority rules absolutely and its leaders have ultimate say on what legislative proposals are considered. It instead supports allowing bipartisan measures to have a chance of being debated and voted upon.
Among the group's proposals is mandating that any bill receiving 290 co-sponsors would go to the House floor for debate and a timely vote, an idea that a senior Democratic aide said Ms. Pelosi had already agreed to include in proposed rules she will present when the new Congress convenes in January. Another would guarantee that any amendment that has at least 20 Democratic and 20 Republican co-sponsors would get a debate and a vote. The third request, aimed at empowering rank-and-file lawmakers, is that each member be allowed to introduce one bill, co-sponsored by a member of the other party, to be debated and considered on a committee on which he or she serves.
The effort has infuriated newly empowered liberals, who have accused the Problem Solvers Caucus of being "corporatist" Democrats beholden to the same political donors that Republicans rely on. They question why Democrats are always the ones to cede power when they attain it.
The nine Democrats are in addition to the group that signed the letter last week vowing not to support Ms. Pelosi, a coalition initially numbering 17 that has shrunk since its leaders first sought to form it. There are also at least four newly elected Democrats who did not sign the letter, but have said they will keep their campaign pledge not to back Ms. Pelosi. Another new member who said during his campaign that he would not back Ms. Pelosi, Representative-elect Gil Cisneros of California, added his name to the letter on Monday.
While she needs only a simple majority to be nominated for speaker this week by the Democratic caucus, Ms. Pelosi must win a majority to be formally elected on the House floor on Jan. 3, meaning she could afford to lose only 15 Democrats if all lawmakers were present and voting and no Republicans supported her.
Ms. Pelosi has been working to dispatch with the obstacles in her path, holding a series of conversations in person and over the phone to win support from her detractors.
She is scheduled to meet with the Problem Solvers on Tuesday. Last week, she struck a bargain with Representative Marcia L. Fudge of Ohio, who had weighed a run for speaker but endorsed Ms. Pelosi after she was promised she would be the chairwoman of an election protection subcommittee.
Representative Brian Higgins of New York changed course and agreed to support Ms. Pelosi after a 72-hour pre-Thanksgiving effort she initiated to win him over. By the end, she had promised that his two top legislative priorities — a bill to allow people over 50 to buy in to Medicare and a $1 trillion infrastructure measure — would be top agenda items in the next Congress. It is the kind of quiet deal-making for which Ms. Pelosi is legendary on Capitol Hill, where such horse trading is behind virtually every major piece of legislation.
In an interview on Monday, Mr. Higgins said he, like many lawmakers, recognized that Ms. Pelosi's predicament gave him a unique opportunity to maximize his influence by making it clear precisely what he would need to throw his support to her.
"I think that she's going to get the votes for this, but understand that for members, it's all about leverage — it's all about what you do and when you do it," Mr. Higgins said. "This is a process whereby you've got a vote, which provides you with some leverage, and you have a voice, and the best thing you can do is articulate in a convincing way what it is you want to do and why you want to do it."
And Representative Stephen F. Lynch of Massachusetts told a local TV station on Sunday that if another Democrat did not step forward to challenge Ms. Pelosi, he would grudgingly vote for her over a Republican, even though he believed doing so would endanger his party's majority in the next election and risk re-electing President Trump.
Correction: Nov. 26, 2018
An earlier version of this article misstated when Representative Nancy Pelosi will propose new rules governing how legislation is considered in Congress. She will propose those rules when the new Congress convenes in January, not on Wednesday, when she will unveil rules for the Democratic caucus.
A version of this article appears in print on , Section A, Page 16 of the New York edition with the headline: Leader of Rebellious Democrats Softens His Tone on Pelosi as Speaker. Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe
Meet the Democrats Who Want Pelosi to Step Aside
Pelosi's One Potential Rival Cuts Deal and Drops Speaker Challenge
'Message of Change': 16 Rebel Democrats Vow to Oppose Pelosi
If Not Pelosi, Who Should Lead? The Question Hovers Over a Simmering Rebellion