Childhood bullying: Research analysis suggests long-term reduction in adverse effects
November 27, 2018 By David Yamada in school bullying, workplace bullying, mobbing, and abuse Tags: school bullying, workplace bullying	Leave a comment
A major analysis conducted by a group of London-based university researchers and published in the Psychological Bulletin suggests that the adverse effects of childhood bullying can subside over time.
The London researchers (Tabea Schoeler, Lauren Duncan, Charlotte Cecil, George Ploubidis, and Jean-Baptiste Pingault) examined 16 separate studies of the short and long-term adverse effects of bullying victimization as experienced by youth. They found:
Based on the most stringent evidence available to date, findings indicate that bullying victimization may causally impact children's wellbeing in the short-term, especially anxiety and depression levels. The reduction of adverse effects over time highlights the potential for resilience in individuals who have experienced bullying. Secondary preventive interventions in bullied children should therefore focus on resilience and on addressing children's preexisting vulnerabilities.
In the article's Public Significance Statement, they concluded:
This meta-analysis of quasi-experimental studies suggests that bullying victimization leads to poorer developmental outcome in the short-term, including higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms and reduced academic achievement. These adverse effects diminish in the long-term, highlighting the potential for resilience in individuals who experienced bullying. In addition to tackling bullying, interventions should therefore address the immediate adverse consequences of bullying victimization, while fostering resilience in victimized children.
Unfortunately, the short-term effects — depression, anxiety, reduced academic performance — are not surprising. The more hopeful finding, however, is that the same, significant body of research indicates that these adverse impacts may diminish over the long term.
Relevance to adult and workplace bullying
Response and resilience. Those are the takeaway points from the study that I get when looking at how to help targets of adult and workplace bullying. We need to respond to the immediate adverse consequences (which may include trauma and accompanying health impairments). We also need to foster resilience in bullied workers and, well, in everyone else, too.
This individual focus does not reduce the vital importance of addressing bullying, mobbing, and related behaviors from the perspective of organizational cultures. Organizations typically discourage or enable such behaviors, so this is the starting place for prevention and intervention. We must always remember that these abuses rarely occur in a vacuum, whether we're talking about schools, workplaces, or any other institutional setting.
Hat-tip to Dr. Kenneth Pope for the journal article.
"Why do we reward bullies?"
November 24, 2018 By David Yamada in dignity at work and in society, power & abuse in society, psychology and work, school bullying, workplace bullying, mobbing, and abuse Tags: dignity at work and in society, power & abuse in society, psychology and work, school bullying, workplace bullying	4 Comments
In a New York Times op-ed piece from earlier this year, Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute (a conservative think tank), ponders why our society all too often rewards bullies for their behavior. He offers three reasons:
First, people tend to be selective ethicists. The other side's bully is a horrible person; your side's bully is a "truth teller." Indeed, we sometimes even flip the script and say our bully is actually a victim who is simply fighting back against even bigger bullies.
Second, people are, paradoxically, attracted to bullies. In her book "The Allure of Toxic Leaders," the social scientist Jean Lipman-Blumen shows that people complain about political dictators and tyrannical executives yet nearly always remain loyal out of a primordial admiration for power and need for security in an uncertain world.
The third explanation is simple acquiescence. In a famous study published in 1999 in the Journal of Adolescence, three psychologists investigated how children act when they witness an act of bullying. Hundreds of schoolchildren were videotaped on the playground, and nearly 200 bullying incidents were recorded. . . . And how did the peers react? Twenty-one percent joined the bully, while 25 percent defended the victim. The rest — 54 percent — watched the incident passively, neither joining in nor defending the victim.
Brooks's perspectives on bullying were shaped by his experiences performing with a professional symphony orchestra during his twenties. He calls orchestra conductors "notorious tyrants, cruel and demanding" who "turn players against one another, prey on weakness, destroy confidence."
One of the most telling aspects of this op-ed piece is how the experience of being bullied can stick with people for decades. Brooks in his mid-fifties. He is a regular contributor of op-ed pieces to the New York Times. His editorial voice tends to be deliberate and pointed, rather than overtly emotional. Accordingly, his sharp criticisms about orchestra conductors show, in hard relief, the lasting impact of bullying.
Brooks suggests that standing up to bullies is the best way to curb their power and ability to abuse others. He may be right in some instances, but there are plenty of stories where taking on bullies has backfired badly. There is no magic response; power dynamics and surrounding circumstances all matter. What we need are more people who oppose bullying and abusive leaders, thereby creating a broader and deeper cultural norm that does not tolerate such mistreatment as a matter of course.
Toxic workplace cultures and bullying at work (2018)
Creating a society grounded in human dignity (2018)
November 21, 2018 By David Yamada in holidays, travel Tags: holidays, travel	Leave a comment
(Photo courtesy of Shreder 9100 at en.wikipedia)
For this Thanksgiving, I'll be jumping on an Amtrak train for a quick trip to New York, where I'll be joining family and friends for a longstanding tradition of celebrating the holiday together with wonderful company and a scrumptious meal. I am grateful for this gathering and the people who are a part of it, and I'll be able to walk the streets of my old stomping grounds of Manhattan to boot.
And yet as I write this, I know that many are struggling. Indeed, many readers of this blog have experienced terrible work situations that have undermined their lives and livelihoods. Their plights are ongoing reminders of how we need to fix a good number of workplaces, with human dignity as our overriding framework.
Especially to those readers whose lives are in turmoil, I offer a Thanksgiving wish of better days to come. And may those better days come sooner than later.
Holiday reads: Fueling heart, mind, and soul (2014) — Highlighting three great books that help to re-ground us.
Transitions and inner callings (2014) — Looking at a valuable book for understanding life and work transitions.
Holiday reflections: The end of limitless possibilities (and that's good) (2013) — Featuring one of the best photos I've ever taken!
Education for life's afternoons and evenings
November 18, 2018 By David Yamada in career planning, education and learning, lifespan issues Tags: career planning, education and learning, lifespan issues	2 Comments
One of my favorite passages pertaining to the importance of adult learning is found in psychiatrist Carl Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul (1933). He asks, "Or are there perhaps colleges for forty-year-olds which prepare them for their coming life and its demands as the ordinary colleges introduce our young people to a knowledge of the world and of life?" He answers:
No, there are none. Thoroughly unprepared we take the step into the afternoon of life; worse still, we take this step with the false presupposition that our truths and ideals will serve us hitherto. But we cannot live the afternoon of life according to the programme of life's morning – for what was great in the morning will be little at evening, and what in the morning was true will at evening have become a lie. I have given psychological treatment to too many people of advancing years, and have looked too often into the secret chambers of their souls, not to be moved by this fundamental truth.
To borrow from Jung, we sure could use some schools to help us understand, shape, and engage the afternoons and evenings of our lives. I'm not necessarily talking about formal degree programs, although they may well enter the picture for older adults seeking a career switch. Rather, I'm thinking more along the lines of adult education centers — both physical and virtual — that offer affordable, interactive, community-building learning experiences on topics related to life's big picture topics.
As a possible model, I nominate The School of Life, a London-based, global learning center that offers courses, counseling, and publications "dedicated to developing emotional intelligence" by applying "psychology, philosophy, and culture to everyday life." Their offerings cover personal relationships, the workplace, the self and others, and culture. Here's a three-minute video that describes more about their offerings:
The School of Life's originally opened in London, and it has since added centers in Amsterdam, Antwerp, Berlin, Istanbul, Melbourne, Paris, Sao Paulo, Seoul, Sydney, Taipei, and Tel Aviv. I would be delighted to see one in Boston!
Regardless of whether The School of Life is the preferred model, my larger point is that themes of lifelong learning, lifespan development, and inevitable aging lead us to ask what educational opportunities exist for people to learn and grow together during life's second half. Alas, I submit that we face a gaping shortage of such options. Especially given the aging populations of many nations, it would be great to see more "colleges for forty-year-olds" (and older, of course!) to help people make the most of their lives.
Kindness and compassion at work and elsewhere
November 15, 2018 By David Yamada in dignity at work and in society, experience of work, notable books, philanthropy Tags: dignity at work and in society, experience of work, notable books, philanthropy	5 Comments
Dear readers, I've collected six previous pieces on kindness and compassion at work and elsewhere. Consider it food for thought as we enter the holiday season!
Valuing kindness over emotional intelligence in today's workplace (2016) — "For years I've exhorted the importance of emotional intelligence in the workplace. But Bariso's piece reminds us that a high EQ isn't enough. By contrast, Rex Huppke, writing for the Chicago Tribune, suggests that kindness and being 'a decent human being' will contribute to better, more successful workplaces . . ."
Not-so-random acts of kindness for the non-saintly among us (2015) — "Last November, I was crossing the street near Boston's Faneuil Hall when I saw a man huddled in a blanket, shuffling past me in the opposite direction. I caught a glimpse of his eyes for only a second, but I could see a lot of sadness in them. When I got to the other side, I turned around and watched him make his way to a public bench, where he sat and seemed to just stare down. . . . "
Cultivating heart quality in professional practices (2015) — "Carolyn Thomas, a heart attack survivor and women's health advocate, writes about the importance of kindness in health care practice in her popular Heart Sisters blog, starting with a story about her visit to the emergency room and subsequent placement in the cardiac care unit . . . ."
Does "mainstream indifference" undermine compassion and dignity at work? (2015) — "In The Rapture of Maturity: A Legacy of Lifelong Learning (2004), home-brewed philosopher Charles D. Hayes (and one of my favorite authors) writes about how "mainstream indifference" fuels a lack of compassion and kindness in our society. . . ."
Imagining the "compassionate mind" at work (2013) — "In a thoughtful, compelling piece on the 'compassionate mind,' Dr. Emma Seppala draws together a wealth of research and analysis on the role on compassion — defined 'as the emotional response when perceiving suffering and involves an authentic desire to help' — in advancing the human condition."
A 12-step program for compassion (2010) — "Karen Armstrong is a noted author on religious affairs. Her latest book is Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life (2010), a mix of faith, philosophy, and self-help. In it, she offers a 12-step program to help make the world a more compassionate place . . . ."
Dignity work
November 11, 2018 By David Yamada in dignity at work and in society, experience of work, Future of the workplace, power & abuse in society, strategies for change, voluntarism Tags: dignity at work and in society, experience of work, Future of the workplace, power & abuse in society, strategies for change, voluntarism	3 Comments
(image courtesy of clipart panda.com)
I've been toying with a simple phrase lately: Dignity work. What does it mean? How might we define it? What if we made the nurturing of dignity our primary purpose as human beings? What kind of world would we see?
I see at least two angles on this:
First, we can look at dignity work through a lens of whether the core qualities of our labors — paid, unpaid, and volunteer alike — affirm, support, or advance human dignity.
Second, we can look at dignity work through a lens of whether we, as individuals, conduct ourselves in ways that affirm, support, or advance human dignity.
In considering these two possibilities, I suggest that we define dignity broadly, as a quality that embraces the better angels of our nature, to borrow from Abraham Lincoln. Providing attentive and loving caregiving to another is an obvious example of both strands of dignity work. But so is, say, starting a business that serves a community's needs and treats its employees well, or creating an inclusive network or group devoted to a creative endeavor.
We live in a world where dignity is too often neglected in favor of raw exercises of power and the quest for profits, at times to the points of abuse and exploitation. In the meantime, opportunities to engage dignity work are all around us. We have choices.
Sarkis: How to identify a gaslighter
November 8, 2018 By David Yamada in notable books, power & abuse in society, psychology and work, workplace bullying, mobbing, and abuse Tags: notable books, power & abuse in society, psychology and work, workplace bullying	1 Comment
Joining the growing literature on gaslighting behaviors is Dr. Stephanie Sarkis's Gaslighting: Recognize Manipulative and Emotionally Abusive People — and Break Free (2018). Sarkis is both a counselor and a mediator, and her experiences in clinical practice brought gaslighting and gaslighters to her attention. The results of her work make for this welcomed contribution to our understanding.
Dr. Sarkis writes:
Gaslighters will convince us that we are crazy, that we are abusive, that we are a huge bundle of problems and no one else will want us, that we are terrible employees who haven't been fired yet just by the grace of God, that we are terrible parents who shouldn't have had children, that we have no idea how to manage our own life, or that we are a burden to others. They are toxic.
…Gaslighters use your own words against you; plot against you, lie to your face, deny your needs, show excessive displays of power, try to convince you of "alternative facts," turn family and friends against you — all with the goal of watching you suffer, consolidating their power, and increasing your dependence on them.
But wait, there's a lot more. Among other things, in a chapter titled "Who, me?," Sarkis asks her readers to confront the ugly question: Am I a gaslighter? Consider these queries, adapted from pp. 204-205:
Do I lie often, "even when lying doesn't serve a purpose"?
Do I avoid being direct in sharing my needs, instead expecting people to read my mind and know what I want — and then being upset at them for not knowing?
Do I not know my own needs?
Do I try to get people to do want I want, "instead of just directly asking them"?
Do I not tell people what I want, then get back at them for not providing it?
Do I get frustrated when others take more time than they should to do what I'd like?
Do others tell me that my "tone of voice is sarcastic or rough"?
Do I "have a short temper"?
Do I "black out" and forget things I did when I was in an angry state?
Do I see people as being "mainly selfish and out for their own needs"?
For those who answer "yes" to a lot of these questions, Sarkis offers compassionate, direct advice, rather than judgment.
Gaslighting joins Dr. Robin Stern's excellent The Gaslight Effect (2018 ed.) (discussed earlier this year) in providing wise, accessible insights on gaslighting behaviors, their impacts, and how to respond to them. Although both books focus more on interpersonal relationships, those who are interested in bullying, mobbing, and other forms of psychological abuse at work will find plenty of relevant information and observations.
Institutional gaslighting of whistleblowers (2018)
Reissued for 2018: Robin Stern's "The Gaslight Effect" (2018)
Gaslighting at work (2017, rev. 2018)
Inauguration Week special: "Gaslighting" goes mainstream (2017)
Is gaslighting a gendered form of workplace bullying? (2013)
Gaslighting as a workplace bullying tactic (2012, rev. 2017)
When diversity issues emerge, bullying often lurks underneath
November 2, 2018 By David Yamada in diversity and discrimination, management practices, media, workplace bullying, mobbing, and abuse Tags: diversity and discrimination, management practices, media, workplace bullying	Leave a comment
Last week, NBC News cancelled the "Megyn Kelly Today" show days after Kelly made racially insensitive remarks about wearing blackface for Halloween. As reported by Megan McCluskey for Time magazine:
Amid growing controversy over Megyn Kelly's racially insensitive comments about blackface, NBC News has announced that it has canceled Kelly's 9 a.m. hour of the Today Show, Megyn Kelly Today.
. . . Kelly came under fire earlier this week for saying that she doesn't understand why blackface Halloween costumes are racist during a roundtable discussion on offensive costumes on her talk show, Megyn Kelly Today.
"What is racist?" she asked a panel that included Jenna Bush Hager, Jacob Soboroff and Melissa Rivers. "You do get in trouble if you are a white person who puts on blackface for Halloween, or a black person who puts on whiteface for Halloween. Back when I was a kid, that was okay just as long as you were dressing as a character."
One can make a plausible claim that cancellation was a harsh consequence for one badly misinformed and ignorant remark. After all, Kelly's transgression paled next to virulently mean-spirited statements tweeted out by Donald Trump on a regular basis. However, many news reports have suggested that this may have been simply a tipping point preceded by other concerns about her show. Among other things, while Kelly has become a strong voice for women's interests during the #MeToo era, she also has a history of stirring up controversy on matters related to race.
In any event, as I searched around to learn more about Kelly's situation, I found an earlier news report that reminded me once again that when diversity-related concerns publicly emerge out of a given workplace, allegations of bullying behaviors often aren't far behind. From January of this year, here is Emily Smith's Page Six account of a "Megyn Kelly Today" writer who lost his job after complaining of alleged bullying behaviors faced by staffers:
A top staffer on Megyn Kelly's show has been fired after claiming there is a "toxic and demeaning" environment on set, rife with bullying and "abusive treatment."
Kevin Bleyer was fired as a writer from "Megyn Kelly Today" this week after complaining that Kelly's two top execs, Jackie Levin and Christine Cataldi, were bullying lower-level members of staff.
. . . Bleyer — a multiple Emmy-winning former writer for "The Daily Show" and speechwriter for President Barack Obama — on Tuesday sent the email to NBC News human resources, and was fired shortly after.
He wrote in the memo, revealed by the Daily Mail,"I'm sad to say … the executive incompetence continues — as does the dysfunctional management, abusive treatment, maddening hypocrisy, staggering inefficiencies, acidic and deficient communication, and relentless scapegoating. Jackie Levin persists in creating a toxic and demeaning environment, and Christine Cataldi enables and reinforces it."
He claims Cataldi regularly calls her assistant "an idiot," and when he offered suggestions for the show, Levin called him a "f–king whiner."
At times there's a more direct connection between the diversity-related behaviors and workplace bullying. As I reported earlier this year, Tom Ashbrook, a popular public radio program host here in Boston, was fired for engaging in bullying behaviors after initially being accused of sexual harassment. In the same piece, I wrote about how Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, an accused serial sexual harasser, has also been tagged as a bullying boss.