The Efficient Norm for Corporate Law: A Neotraditional Interpretation of Fiduciary Duty
55 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2000
See all articles by Thomas A. Smith
Thomas A. Smith
There are 2 versions of this paper
Number of pages: 55 Posted: 06 Mar 2000
You are currently viewing this paper
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 1, October 1999
This paper argues that a hypothetical contract analysis of fiduciary duty requires a corporate law norm that the total value of financial claims against the firm be maximized. This conclusion follows from using rational investors complying with the CAPM mandate as the parties making the hypothetical contract under which resources are committed to the firm. The analysis shows some inadequacies in the "shareholder value maximization" norm that is assumed in most corporate law literature. The norm of maximizing firm value fits best with an abstract conception of fiduciary duty in which the duty is owed to the corporation, rather than to shareholders or any other particular class of security holders. Adopting this conception dissolves many of the fiduciary duty puzzles posed by derivative securities, such as those stressed by Hu.
Smith, Thomas A., The Efficient Norm for Corporate Law: A Neotraditional Interpretation of Fiduciary Duty. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=195588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.195588
Thomas A. Smith (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
619-260 2318 (Phone)
619-260 2219 (Fax)