Bank Secrecy Act:
Examiners Need More Information on How to Assess Banks' Compliance Controls for Money Transmitter Accounts
GAO-20-46: Published: Dec 3, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2019.
Michael E. Clements
clementsm@gao.gov
To fight money laundering and other crimes, the Bank Secrecy Act requires banks to verify customers' identities and report suspicious activities. We looked at federal oversight of banks' compliance with these requirements—particularly when banks' customers are money transmitting businesses.
Some federal bank examiners were unclear about how much due diligence they should expect from banks' site visits and reviews of their money transmitter customers.
We recommended that banking regulators update examination procedures, provide examiner training, or take other steps to improve evaluation of banks' compliance.
From 2014 through 2016, 40 of 86 banks with money transmitter customers that responded to GAO's survey indicated they terminated at least one money transmitter account for money-laundering-related reasons. Money transmitters transfer money for their customers to recipients domestically or internationally. Common reasons given for terminating accounts included the customer not providing information needed to satisfy the banks' due diligence requirements under Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)/anti-money laundering (AML) regulations and that the cost of BSA/AML compliance made these customers unprofitable. However, banks also cited concerns that these customers drew heightened regulatory oversight; this may indicate "derisking," the practice of banks limiting services or closing accounts with customers to avoid any perceived regulatory concerns about facilitating money laundering.
Federal bank examiners in some of GAO's discussion groups identified challenges in assessing banks' compliance with due diligence requirements. In 2005, the Department of the Treasury's (Treasury) Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the federal banking regulators issued interagency interpretive guidance to clarify BSA/AML requirements and supervisory expectations for banks providing banking services to money transmitters. The guidance was incorporated in the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council BSA/AML examination manual. However, examiners from some discussion groups said it was unclear how much due diligence is reasonable to expect banks to conduct for their money transmitter customers. For example, while the manual's examination guidance pertaining to money transmitters states that due diligence on higher-risk accounts can include reviewing the money transmitter's BSA/AML compliance program or conducting on-site visits, the related examination procedures do not clarify what these reviews or visits might entail. Unless federal banking regulators take steps to improve examiners' ability to evaluate banks' compliance with BSA/AML requirements as applied to money transmitter accounts, examiners may not be fully achieving examination objectives.
In response to derisking concerns associated with money transmitters, FinCEN and the federal banking regulators have issued general guidance that discourages banks from terminating accounts with any particular customer type without evaluating individual customers' risks. In prior work, GAO noted that regulators had not fully evaluated how banks' regulatory concerns may be influencing decisions to derisk. GAO recommended that FinCEN and the federal banking regulators conduct a retrospective review of BSA regulations and their implementation, with a focus on how banks' regulatory concerns may affect their decisions to provide services. According to federal banking regulators and FinCEN, they and Treasury established an interagency working group in early 2018 that they believe will address the recommendation. The working group has taken important steps toward improving the efficiency and effectiveness of BSA/AML supervision, including issuing an interagency statement intended to improve the transparency of the risk-focused approach examiners use to plan and conduct BSA examinations. However, the working group has not yet evaluated the full range of factors that may influence banks to derisk.
The World Bank and others have reported that some money transmitters have been losing access to banking services. Money transmitters play an important role in the financial system, in part because they provide financial services to people less likely to use traditional banking services. GAO was asked to review the causes and potential effects of derisking by banks.
This report examines, among other issues, (1) the extent to which banks are terminating or limiting services for money transmitters, (2) challenges in assessing banks' BSA/AML compliance related to money transmitters, and (3) regulators' actions to address derisking concerns.
GAO reviewed bank examination reports and documents, held eight discussion groups with federal bank examiners, surveyed a nationally representative sample of 406 banks (excluding credit unions), and interviewed federal and bank officials, money transmitters, industry associations, and other stakeholders.
GAO is making a total of four recommendations to the federal banking regulators that each regulator improve examiners' ability to evaluate banks' BSA/AML compliance as applied to money transmitter accounts. The federal banking regulators agreed with GAO's recommendations.
GAO also reiterates its recommendation in GAO-18-263 that FinCEN and the federal banking regulators conduct a retrospective review of BSA regulations and implementation.
For more information, contact Michael E. Clements at (202) 512-8678 or clementsm@gao.gov.
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System should, in coordination with the other federal banking regulators, and with input from BSA/AML examiners and other relevant stakeholders, take steps to improve examiners' ability to evaluate the effectiveness of banks' BSA/AML compliance controls with respect to money transmitter accounts. Steps may include providing updates to examination procedures, examiner training, or a combination of methods. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Federal Reserve System
Recommendation: The Comptroller of the Currency should, in coordination with the other federal banking regulators, and with input from BSA/AML examiners and other relevant stakeholders, take steps to improve examiners' ability to evaluate the effectiveness of banks' BSA/AML compliance controls with respect to money transmitter accounts. Steps may include providing updates to examination procedures, examiner training, or a combination of methods. (Recommendation 2)
Agency Affected: Department of the Treasury: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Recommendation: The Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation should, in coordination with the other federal banking regulators, and with input from BSA/AML examiners and other relevant stakeholders, take steps to improve examiners' ability to evaluate the effectiveness of banks' BSA/AML compliance controls with respect to money transmitter accounts. Steps may include providing updates to examination procedures, examiner training, or a combination of methods. (Recommendation 3)
Agency Affected: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Recommendation: The Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration should, in coordination with the other federal banking regulators, and with input from BSA/AML examiners and other relevant stakeholders, take steps to improve examiners' ability to evaluate the effectiveness of banks' BSA/AML compliance controls with respect to money transmitter accounts. Steps may include providing updates to examination procedures, examiner training, or a combination of methods. (Recommendation 4)
Agency Affected: National Credit Union Administration
Find Recent Work on Financial Markets and Institutions »
Securities and Exchange Commission:
Personnel Management Shows Improvement, but Action Needed on Performance Management System
Systematically Assessing Staff Procedures and Enhancing Control Design Would Strengthen Internal Oversight
Troubled Asset Relief Program:
Status Update on Treasury's Two Active Investment Programs
GAO-20-218R: Published: Dec 16, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 16, 2019.
Financial Services Regulations:
Status of GAO Recommendations to Enhance Regulatory Analyses and Interagency Coordination
Division of Enforcement Should Document Its Procedures for Generating Public Reports
GAO-20-47: Published: Oct 28, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 27, 2019.
Agencies and Financial Institutions Share Information but Metrics and Feedback Not Regularly Provided
GAO-19-582: Published: Aug 27, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 26, 2019.
Federal Home Loan Banks:
Efforts to Promote Workforce, Supplier, and Broker-Dealer Diversity
Financial Technology:
Agencies Should Provide Clarification on Lenders' Use of Alternative Data
GAO-19-694T: Published: Jul 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Jul 25, 2019.
Insurance Markets:
Benefits and Challenges Presented by Innovative Uses of Technology
GAO-19-423: Published: Jun 7, 2019. Publicly Released: Jun 7, 2019.
Export-Import Bank:
EXIM Should Explore Using Available Data to Identify Applicants with Delinquent Federal Debt
Explore our Key Issues on Financial Markets and Institutions
Federal Financial Accountability
Financial Regulation and Housing Finance - High Risk Issue
National Flood Insurance Program - High Risk Issue