Concerns Rise Over Plan to Overhaul USDA Research
Guest Post September 5, 2018
Image in public domain.
(Beyond Pesticides) A plan announced earlier this month by Agriculture Secretary, Sonny Perdue, to relocate one of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) top research office — the Economic Research Service — into the Office of the Secretary, a political branch of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is raising alarm from some scientists. Concerned researchers see the move as a way to cut funding to important projects around climate change and nutrition, among others.
The plan by the Trump administration to overhaul two federal offices overseeing food and agriculture research, the Economic Research Service (ERS) and the National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA), and move them out of Washington by the end of 2019 is being cited by leading agricultural scientists and economists as a ploy to stifle important federal research. Further, no economic or other analysis has been provided to show that such a move would be beneficial.
The Trump administration has targeted ERS for severe funding cuts and says streamlining USDA's operations would save taxpayer money and help the agency recruit and retain top staff, but the move will only serve to isolate the agency from key colleagues and resources concentrated in the capital. This can weaken ERS research by making it more difficult for agency economists to consult with other federal research offices, lawmakers, and federal policy groups. More troubling, is that relocating ERS to the Office of the Secretary could compromise and politicize federal research responsible for nonpartisan food and agricultural economic analysis; an issue the office's current placement was designed to prevent.
In the August announcement, it noted that new locations have yet to be determined, and that ERS and NIFA may be co-located when their new homes are found. ERS and NIFA account for just over half of the $2.5 billion Congress budgeted for agricultural research in 2018. ERS employs 300 people in the D.C. region, according to the USDA. NIFA, which funds competitive research grants at U.S. universities, employs a D.C. staff of roughly 400.
ERS research covers a range of issues, studying trends and emerging issues in agriculture, food, the environment, and rural America from crop yields and food prices to farm conservation practices, rural employment, and nutrition assistance. Key reports serve those who make or influence public policy decisions around farm and food and include Congress, other federal agencies, and state and local governments. For instance, recent ERS findings have concluded that trade liberalization benefits U.S. farmers, despite the Trump administration contrary stance.
According to The New York Times, Scott Swinton, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State and the former president of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, said the reorganization may be a pretext for gutting federal agricultural research. Many top economists and scientists will resign, he predicts, rather than leave the D.C. area.
"What really troubles me is that the administration proposed cutting the ERS budget by 48 percent and laying off half its staff six months ago," Dr. Swinton said. "My fear is that now this plan will lead to a high number of resignations — and the administration will say, 'Well, we don't need as much money now,' rather than build that capacity again."
Sonny Ramaswamy, PhD, who served as NIFA's administrator until his six-year term expired in May, said that the new Agriculture Secretary refused to allow him to fill open positions at NIFA, even as other departments added employees. At one point, Dr. Ramaswamy also met with congressional staff members to argue against proposed cuts to his department's budget, although he says he remained on good terms with USDA's political appointees.
"I don't have an ax to grind here," Dr. Ramaswamy said. "I'm just concerned that they're taking this agency back decades at a time when we want them thinking about compelling scientific challenges."
All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.
Trump Nominates Pesticides Company Exec for Chief Scientist at USDA
Beyond Pesticides
Young Woman Pushes Gender Equality in Libya Through Food-Selling App "Yummy"
Amazon Exemplifies Outsized Power and Influence
Environmental Chemicals Are Stealing IQ Points From American Children and Costing Trillions to the Economy
Guest Post January 18, 2020
Bayer Monsanto Skirts Felony Charge for Banned Pesticide Use in Hawaii by Calling on DOJ Connections
Guest Post November 30, 2019
Increased Risk of Skin Cancer Tied to Use of Weed Killers
Study Finds Urban Runoff is a Toxic Soup Containing Dozens of Pesticides and Other Industrial Chemicals
Steve Vose September 10, 2018
Eventually, the only "science" will be THEIR "science."
Eventually, a tweet will say "our "scientists tell me we now have the cleanest water in the world! As most low income urban centers have water coming out their faucet colored orange.
Eventually, a tweet will say "our 'scientists' tell me we now have the cleanest air in the history of the world!" As millions of Americans walk around with surgical masks on their face.
Eventually, another tweet will say, our "scientists" tell me we have the cleanest water in the in the world!" As most low income urban centers have water coming out their faucets colored orange.
Eventually, another tweet will say, "our 'scientists' tell us we have the cleanest air in the history of the world!" As millions of Americans walk around with surgical masks on their face.
Ronald Christensen September 11, 2018
Trump will fuck that up, as he does everything else !
Ronald Christensen
Define fuck it up?
Its a well founded fear.
These people are hellbent on taking this country to a place that the rich, corporations and law enforcement had no accountability
They will sit on their hills and watch us die.
As poverty and disease increase among us common folk they will thrive.
As they find a new group of us to blame so they can kill us off or ship us off.
When there is no one left to blame but themselves, it will be too late.
Fred Latimer September 22, 2018
You can expect more of this type of thing as Trump moves forward with his plan of destroying our government in order to make it easy for his rich friends to establish a dictatorship where there will be no concern about our environment.
Shirley Hawkins September 23, 2018
Devil don't have any respect for Americans anyway and they should be jail with him.
Juan Reynoso September 30, 2018
By Juan Reynoso.
The USDA is in collusion with the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex and food manufactories to kill the American people. Seek the truth and let the people know.
Fellow Americans, for years we have knowledge that the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex, is the biggest drug cartel that in collusion with the insurance industries and our Government, Killed thousands of Americans and never any one was prosecuted and send to jail for their crimes; because they have immunity from our own Government for all these crimes. They deceived the American people and knowingly killed thousands of Americans to make profits.
Please seek the truth and demand justice for the people of this country. We are being demise by greedy corporations that are corrupt sociopaths, our Government has the responsibility to protect the people from these killers for profit.
U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry.
https://www.statista.com/topics/1719/pharmaceutical-industry/
The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex | Pharmaceutical …
100,000 people in the United States alone die each year from the side-effects of correctly used prescription drugs.
The True History of Chemotherapy & The Pharmaceutical Monopoly
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/11/17/the-true-history-of-chemotherapy-the-pharmaceutical-monopoly/
Big-Pharma Industry, The world's number one killers
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_industrybigpharma.htm
Prescription Drugs Are Killing Us.
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/02/17/meet-the-doctor-who-says-prescription-drugs-are-killing-us-and-hes-not-the-only-one/
Making A Killing: The Untold Story Of Psychotropic Drugging (Documentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHlLRge45sg
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS
https://www.selectusa.gov/pharmaceutical-and-biotech-industries-united-states
<h1>Concerns Rise Over Plan to Overhaul USDA Research</h1> <p class="byline">by Guest Post, Citizen Truth <br />September 5, 2018</p> <div class="navigation"></div> <div id="post-23282" class="post"> <div class="entry"> <p>(<a href="https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2018/08/concerns-rise-over-plan-to-overhaul-usda-research/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Pesticides</em></a>) A plan announced earlier this month by Agriculture Secretary, Sonny Perdue, to relocate one of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) top research office — the Economic Research Service — into the Office of the Secretary, a political branch of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is raising alarm from some scientists. Concerned researchers see the move as a way to cut funding to important projects around climate change and nutrition, among others.</p> <p><a href="https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2018/08/09/usda-realign-ers-chief-economist-relocate-ers-nifa-outside-dc">The plan</a> by the Trump administration to overhaul two federal offices overseeing food and agriculture research, the Economic Research Service (ERS) and the National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA), and move them out of Washington by the end of 2019 is being cited by leading agricultural scientists and economists as a ploy to stifle important federal research. Further, no economic or other analysis has been provided to show that such a move would be beneficial.</p> <p>The Trump administration has targeted ERS for severe funding cuts and says streamlining USDA's operations would save taxpayer money and help the agency recruit and retain top staff, but the move will only serve to isolate the agency from key colleagues and resources concentrated in the capital. This can weaken ERS research by making it more difficult for agency economists to consult with other federal research offices, lawmakers, and federal policy groups. More troubling, is that relocating ERS to the Office of the Secretary could compromise and politicize federal research responsible for nonpartisan food and agricultural economic analysis; an issue the office's current placement was designed to prevent.</p> <p>In the <a href="https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2018/08/09/usda-realign-ers-chief-economist-relocate-ers-nifa-outside-dc">August announcement</a>, it noted that new locations have yet to be determined, and that ERS and NIFA may be co-located when their new homes are found. ERS and NIFA account for <a href="https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USDA-Budget-Summary-2018.pdf">just over half</a> of the $2.5 billion Congress budgeted for agricultural research in 2018. ERS employs 300 people in the D.C. region, according to the USDA. NIFA, which funds competitive research grants at U.S. universities, employs a D.C. staff of roughly 400.</p> <p><a href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/">ERS research</a> covers a range of issues, studying trends and emerging issues in agriculture, food, the environment, and rural America from crop yields and food prices to farm conservation practices, rural employment, and nutrition assistance. Key reports serve those who make or influence public policy decisions around farm and food and include Congress, other federal agencies, and state and local governments. For instance, recent ERS findings have concluded that trade liberalization benefits U.S. farmers, despite the Trump administration contrary stance.</p> <p>According to <em>The New York Times</em>, Scott Swinton, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State and the former president of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, said the reorganization may be a pretext for gutting federal agricultural research. Many top economists and scientists will resign, he predicts, rather than leave the D.C. area.</p> <p>"What really troubles me is that the administration proposed cutting the ERS budget by 48 percent and laying off half its staff six months ago," Dr. Swinton said. "My fear is that now this plan will lead to a high number of resignations — and the administration will say, 'Well, we don't need as much money now,' rather than build that capacity again."</p> <p>Sonny Ramaswamy, PhD, who served as NIFA's administrator until his six-year term expired in May, said that the new Agriculture Secretary refused to allow him to fill open positions at NIFA, even as other departments added employees. At one point, Dr. Ramaswamy also met with congressional staff members to argue against proposed cuts to his department's budget, although he says he remained on good terms with USDA's political appointees.</p> <p data-elm-loc="20">"I don't have an ax to grind here," Dr. Ramaswamy said. "I'm just concerned that they're taking this agency back decades at a time when we want them thinking about compelling scientific challenges."</p> <p data-elm-loc="20"><em>All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.</em></p> </div> <p>https://citizentruth.org/trump-nominates-pesticides-company-exec-for-chief-scientist-at-usda/</p> </div>
This <a target="_blank" href="https://citizentruth.org/concerns-rise-over-plan-to-overhaul-usda-research/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://citizentruth.org">Citizen Truth</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://citizentruth.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=47940&ga=UA-92071989-1" style="width:1px;height:1px;">