Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs SolarWinds Security Event Manager comparison
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager report
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Sophos Intercept X
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Carbon Black CB Defense
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra
Fortinet FortiEDR
FireEye Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
Tanium
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Code42 Next-Gen DLP
RSA NetWitness Endpoint
SECDO Platform
Blackberry Optics
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
McAfee Active Response
Infocyte HUNT
McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
Elastic Security
ESET Enterprise Inspector
AhnLab EDR
GoSecure Endpoint Detection and Response
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus
SanerNow
OpenText EnCase Endpoint Security
Fidelis Endpoint
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Blackberry UEM
AtomicEye CP
N-able EDR
Open Systems Endpoint Detection and Response
ClearSkies NG Endpoint Detection & Response
Adaptiva
Blackberry Dynamics Apps
Blackberry Dynamics Platform
Absolute Control
SolarWinds Security Event Manager
Read 13 Cisco Secure Endpoint reviews.
Read 6 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews.
9,031 views|6,859 comparisons
Read 7 SolarWinds Security Event Manager reviews.
Security Officer at a healthcare company
Gives great network visibility by showing how a file interacts with other systems, devices, and files
The visibility and insight this solution gives you into threats is pretty granular. It has constant monitoring. You can get onto the device... Read more →
Senior Security Engineer at a financial services firm
Helps us to mitigate and isolate on the fly but has increased false positives
The best example of how it has helped is that we can do searches via the API. And so we have our automation tool do a lot of searches automatically... Read more →
Easy to install and will tell you such things as Failing MS SQL Server backups (Full, Diff or Transactional) etc
We're able to do a bit more in terms of forensic analysis. I am able to correlate the S.A.M. Service Applications Monitoring in SolarWinds ORION... Read more →
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: January 2022.
"Any alert that we get is an actionable alert. Immediately, there is information that we can just click through, see the point in time, what happened, what caused it, and what automatic actions were taken. We can then choose to take any manual actions, if we want, or start our investigation. We're no longer looking at digging into information or wading through hundreds of incidents. There's a list which says where the status is assigned, e.g., under investigation or investigation finished. That is all in the console. It has taken away a lot of the administration, which we would normally be doing, and integrated it into the console for us." "One of the best features of AMP is its cloud feature. It doesn't matter where the device is in regards to whether it's inside or outside of your network environment, especially right now when everybody's remote and taken their laptops home. You don't have to be VPNed into the environment for AMP to work. AMP will work anywhere in the world, as long as it has an Internet connection. You get protection and reporting with it. No matter where the device is, AMP has still got coverage on it and is protecting it. You still have the ability to manage and remediate things. The cloud feature is the magic bullet. This is what makes the solution a valuable tool as far as I'm concerned." "Another of my favorite features is called the Device Trajectory, where it shows everything that's going on, on a computer. It shows the point in time when a virus is downloaded, so you can see if the user was surfing the internet or had a program open. It shows every running process and file access on the computer and saves it like a snapshot when it detects something malicious. It also has a File Trajectory, so you can even see if that file has been found on any of your other computers that have AMP." "The solution makes it possible to see a threat once and block it everywhere across all endpoints and the entire security platform. It has the ability to block right down to the file and application level across all devices based on policies, such as, blacklisting and whitelisting of software and applications. This is good. Its strength is the ability to identify threats very quickly, then lock them and the network down and block the threats across the organization and all devices, which is what you want. You don't want to be spending time working out how to block something. You want to block something very quickly, letting that flow through to all the devices and avoiding the same scenario on different operating systems." "If somebody has been compromised, the question always is: How has it affected other devices in the network? Cisco AMP gives you a very neat view of that." "Among the most valuable features are the exclusions. And on the scalability side, we can integrate well with the SIEM orchestration engine and a number of applications that are proprietary or open source." "The threat Grid with the ability to observe the sandboxing, analyze, and perform investigations of different malicious files has been great." "The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features."
More Cisco Secure Endpoint Pros →
"The solution is efficient." "Their EDR solution, the ability to mitigate issues through their command line, is probably the best feature that we've had. We use that all the time. It's very useful for doing investigations." "Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment." "The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI." "Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective." "The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Pros →
"It's extremely easy to deploy." "This tool is simple to use." "It's easy to build rules and actions based on the logs and event types we collect with the software." "It has in-depth monitoring capabilities and an easy way for setting up dashboards. I can expand in various areas, or I can reduce areas. It supports different types of breakdowns, filters, and rules. It is very simple for an out-of-the-box type of product. It doesn't take a lot of time to figure it out, which is unlike some of the solutions that I have looked at. It meets all the aspects." "SolarWinds' stability is fine. I don't think we've had any software issues." "The most valuable feature is the reporting." "Some of the rules are most valuable because you can be notified about various things, such as spyware or things that are going on in the internal network."
More SolarWinds Security Event Manager Pros →
"The one challenge that I see is the use of multiple endpoint protection platforms. For instance, we have AMP, but we also have Microsoft Windows Defender, System Center Endpoint Protection, and Microsoft Malware Protection Engine deployed. So, we have a bunch of different things that do the same thing. What winds up happening is, e.g., if I get an alert for a potential incident or malware and want to pull the file, I'll go to fetch the file to analyze it. But, one of these other programs has already gotten it, so the file has already been quarantined by another endpoint protection system. AMP doesn't realize that and the file fetch fails, then you're left wondering what's going on." "...the greatest value of all, would be to make the security into a single pane of glass. Whilst these products are largely integrated from a Talos perspective, they're not integrated from a portal perspective. For example, we have to look at an Umbrella portal and a separate AMP portal. We also have to look at a separate portal for the firewalls. If I could wave a magic wand and have one thing, I would put all the Cisco products into one, simple management portal." "We have had some problems with updates not playing nice with our environment. This is important, because if there is a new version, we need to test it thoroughly before it goes into production. We cannot just say, "There's a new version. It's not going to give us any problems." With the complexity of the solution using multiple engines for multiple tasks, it can sometimes cause performance issues on our endpoints. Therefore, we need to test it before we deploy. That takes one to three days before we can be certain that the new version plays nice with our environment." "I would like to see integration with Cisco Analytics." "We had a lot of noise at the beginning, and we had to turn it down based on exclusions, application whitelisting, and excluding unknown benign applications. Cisco should understand the need for continuous updates on the custom Cisco exclusions and the custom applications that come out-of-the-box with the AMP for Endpoints." "The GUI needs improvement, it's not good." "Maybe there is room for improvement in some of the automated remediation. We have other tools in place that AMP feeds into that allow for that to happen, so I look at it as one seamless solution. But if you're buying AMP all by itself, I don't know if it can remove malicious software after the fact or if it requires the other tools that we use to do some of that." "In Orbital, there are tons of prebuilt queries, but there is not a lot of information in lay terms. There isn't enough information to help us with what we're looking for and why we are looking for it with this query. There are probably a dozen queries in there that really focus on what I need to focus on, but they are not always easy to find the first time through."
More Cisco Secure Endpoint Cons →
"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on." "The product's reporting isn't great." "Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts." "Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality." "The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor." "Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Cons →
"SolarWinds should improve its correlation capabilities. The correlation does not automatically detect and reduce the events fast enough. You have to manually do a correlation report, which means the tool is not scalable in many ways." "Under the new system, it is not upgradable the way they say. When you try to do an upgrade, it doesn't really work unless you dump everything and start from scratch. You lose a lot of your nodes. Whenever you set your nodes up and everything else, they don't want to bring those nodes back in, so you have to really go back and restructure all your nodes. I went from version 6.5 to version 6.6 and then to version 6.7. I then went to version 2019, and now it is version 2020. It would be good if we can upgrade without having to delete everything and start from scratch. They can maybe build more KPIs and other things for the dashboard. Some of the other systems already have built-in KPIs. SolarWinds is starting to catch up, but it is not there yet. They can include some of the business or industry standards for tracking the time, that is, the meantime to detect (MTTD) and the meantime to resolve (MTTR). They can also find a way to build a KPI that measures the number of instances of port scans experienced in a week or a month." "It won't tell you when your backups are failing, but it will give you hints when your database is running on full recovery." "It is a very technical program. They can simplify it so that it isn't so hard to deal with." "I would like to have a more customizable dashboard." "There is no correlation made between log entries, so no threat information is presented." "There are no multiple dashboards which would allow you to see information side-by-side."
More SolarWinds Security Event Manager Cons →
"The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost."
"Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc."
"In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement."
"Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection."
"There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization."
"The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."
"We can know if something bad is potentially happening instantaneously and prevent it from happening. We can go to a device and isolate it before it infects other devices. In our environment, that's millions of dollars saved in a matter of seconds."
"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. The cost of AMP for Endpoints is inline with all the other software that has a monthly endpoint cost. It might be a little bit higher than other antivirus type products, but we're only talking about a dollar a month per user. I don't see that cost as being an issue if it's going to give us the confidence and security that we're looking for. We have had a lot of success and happiness with what we're using, so there's no point in changing."
More Cisco Secure Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
"Licenses can only be purchased in blocks of fifty at a time."
"It is in the appropriate mid-range. It is not as expensive as some of the other solutions. It is also not cheap."
More SolarWinds Security Event Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
What do you like most about Cisco AMP for Endpoints?
The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco AMP for Endpoints?
Licensing fees are on a yearly basis and I am happy with the pricing.
What needs improvement with Cisco AMP for Endpoints?
The GUI needs improvement, it's not good. There are false positives in emails. At times, the emails are blocked and… more »
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
It's not the cheapest, but it's the best. There are no additional costs to standard licensing.
Read all 6 answers →
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use Cybereason for endpoint detection, response, and protection.
What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance… more »
What do you like most about SolarWinds Security Event Manager ?
Some of the rules are most valuable because you can be notified about various things, such as spyware or things that are… more »
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Security Event Manager ?
Licensing cost it's an issue with SolarWinds.
What needs improvement with SolarWinds Security Event Manager ?
It is a very technical program. They can simplify it so that it isn't so hard to deal with. You can be notified of… more »
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint
SentinelOne vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint
Carbon Black CB Defense vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint
More Cisco Secure Endpoint Competitors →
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
SentinelOne vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Darktrace vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors →
Splunk vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager
IBM QRadar vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager
ManageEngine Log360 vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager
LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs. SolarWinds Security Event Manager
More SolarWinds Security Event Manager Competitors →
Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
SolarWinds LEM, Solarwinds SIEM, TriGeo, Log and Event Manager
Cybereason
Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.
Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.
When TriGeo was acquired by SolarWinds, TriGeo SIM became known as SolarWinds Log & Event Manager. This product is a leading Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) product and log management solution, which provides log collection, analysis, and real-time correlation.
Learn more about Cisco Secure Endpoint
Learn more about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Learn more about SolarWinds Security Event Manager
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
NetSuite, EasyStreet, Legacy Texas Bank, and Energy Federal Credit Union, to name a few.
Healthcare Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
University7%
Educational Organization10%
Insurance Company5%
Healthcare Company8%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 6 reviews while SolarWinds Security Event Manager is ranked 16th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 7 reviews. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds Security Event Manager is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response writes "Helps us to mitigate and isolate on the fly but has increased false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Security Event Manager writes "Provides in-depth monitoring capabilities and an easy way to set up dashboards". Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Darktrace, whereas SolarWinds Security Event Manager is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, ManageEngine Log360, Fortinet FortiSIEM and LogRhythm NextGen SIEM.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.