Feb 17 2003 (SC)
Ghapoo Yadav and ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Reported in : AIR2003SC1620; 2003(1)ALD(Cri)495; 2003CriLJ1536; JT2003(3)SC474; 2003(2)MPHT408; RLW2003(3)SC411; 2003(2)SCALE250; (2003)3SCC528; [2003]2SCR69
..... persons were culprits.8. it was the stand of the learned counsel for the appellants that the injuries sustained by the deceased were in course of sudden quarrel without pre-mediation and without cruel intents and, therefore, section 302 ipc was not applicable. according to him, section 302 ipc cannot be applied even if the prosecution case is accepted in toto .....
Sukumaran Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2004CriLJ1462; 2004(1)KLT153
..... prosecution to prove the hostility between the two became hostile to the prosecution. pw.7, another neighbour, also turned hostile, apart from pw10, who had been cited to prove the mediation held to appease the hostility between the two. therefore, the hostility between the two was not proved. the motive was thus not established. there was no eye witness and there .....
Beeyathu Vs. Gopalan
Reported in : 2005(1)KLT313
..... 22, 1979 to the respondents. by this notice, the tenancy was terminated. they were asked to vacate the premises. on october 10, 1979 the first respondent had sent a reply. mediation followed. the building was got repaired. the monthly rent was raised to rs. 15/-. the rent at the revised rate was paid upto april 1980. thereafter no payment was made .....
Mohammad Asif Vs. State of M.P.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT343
awasthy, j.1. the appellant has preferred this appeal against judgment dated 11-5-1990 passed by ivth additional sessions judge, bhopal in sessions trial no. 32 of 1989 against his conviction under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentence of life imprisonment.2. the prosecution case is that on 28-9-1988 at about 1.35 p.m. at kabitpura, bhopal, deceased irfan had scuffle with the appellant and the appellant took out the knife and gave blow on the chest of irfan. that irfan ran towards his house and he was chased by the accused. when the deceased reached his house the accused went away saying that he will not leave him to go to the hospital. eye witnesses of the offence are mother of deceased khalikulnisha (p.w. 5), her daughter-in-law kiswar jahan (p.w. 4) and her son taufique (p.w. 9). kiswar jahan (p.w. 4) rushed to the police station, shahjahanabad and first information report (ex. p-7) was recorded on that very day at about 1.51 p.m. by assistant sub-inspector r.n. mishra (p.w. 8). irfan was declared dead in the hospital and post-mortem of the dead body was conducted by dr. j.n. soni (p.w. 2). dr. j.n. soni (p.w. 2) has found that in the left side of the chest of deceased, there was an incised wound which had cut the lungs and the cause of the death was the shock and haemorrhage due to the injury. investigating officer kuber singh rajput (p.w. 11) took the recovery statement (ex. p-2) of the appellant on 29-9-1988 and a knife was recovered on his instance from .....
One-up Shares and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. Vs. R.R. Singh, Cit
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN687(Bom)
..... was handed back to the mediators.'in view of the above statement of shri agarwal, the commissioner central-ii, new delhi granted concurrence to the proposal made by the director general of income tax (investigations) for ..... not booked any sale or purchase of shares. i have never placed any orders of sale/purchase of shares. the simple modus operandi was that certain mediators had given tome, bogus profit entries. that the mediators used to approach me with cheques, drawn in favour of m/s. friends portfolio (p) ltd. these cheques were deposited in the bank account and cash .....
Savalam Suranna Dora Vs. State
Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)742; 2004CriLJ427
..... no. 13 of 1997 for the offence under section 307, ipc. ex. p-13 is the f.i.r. he also deposed about the visiting of the scene along with mediators and observed the scene of offence and recording of statements. he also deposed about the seizure of m.os. 1 and 2 at the government hospital, rajahmundry. he received the ..... .2 saree and seizing of the same by the s.h.o., devipatnam police station under the cover of mediators report, ex. p-4. he also spoke about the holding of inquest over the dead body of the deceased by the c.i. of police at the mortuary of government ..... 6.00 a.m. p.w. 8, madakam gangannadora is the v.a.o., of manturu village. he was incharge of pudipalli and devipatnam villages. he spoke about acting as mediator along with nookala china pentayya. he also spoke about the observation of scene of offence and drafting observation report, about the doctor producing m.o.i. knife and m.o .....
Geetanjali Wines Vs. P. Bhaskar Reddy and ors.
..... all the stocks except two bottles which were seized from the premises. it is further stated that the statement of the said person was recorded in the presence of the mediators and accordingly seized the spurious liquor and thereafter a case was registered against the licencee. the 1st respondent also denied the allegation that the nowkarnama holder was made to sign ..... excise officers, it is further contended that the so-called spurious liquor bottles were planted in the petitioner's shop with a mala fide intention. it is also stated the mediator to the search and seizure, during their examination denied to have been present throughout proceedings and also denied to have seen the recovery of the spurious liquor bottle in the ..... of the petitioner's wine shop was effected as per the provisions of the a.p. excise act, 1968 and the rules made thereunder. it is further stated that a mediators' report was drawn to the effect that two bottles of spurious liquor was seized from the shop resulting to the seizure of the stock. it is further stated that the .....
Feb 20 2003 (TRI)
Paras Warehousing Corporation, Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in : (2003)(156)ELT504Tri(Mum.)bai
..... was at the premises of paras warehousing corporation, appellant in appeal c/138/95. investigation also revealed that sale of some goods by the importer had been done through a mediator sunil j. shah, a broker (appeal c/130/95). the notice that was issued in july 1993 proposed confiscation of the seized quantities of titanium dioxide, demand for duty of ..... j. shah that it has not been shown that he was aware that the goods could not be sold for want of permission from the licensing authority, and therefore a mediator in their sale in good faith, is not successfully rebutted by the departmental representative. he only emphasises that the broker was concerned with the sale. the fact that he emphasises .....
Dammagouni Dubba Rajagoud and anr. Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Publi ...
Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)292; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)299
..... hold water.8. now, it has to be seen whether m.os.1 to 26 were seized from the possession of the accused. p.ws.6 and 7 are the mediators for the scene of observation. their evidence is not helpful to the case of the prosecution. p.w.8, who is one of the ..... mediators for the arrest and recovery of m.os.1 to 26 from the possession of the accused, did not support the case of the prosecution. p.w.9 simply registered .....
Mohd. Dowlath and anr. Vs. State of A.P.
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)822; 2004CriLJ760; I(2004)DMC447
..... the evidence on record, the learned sessions judge convicted and sentenced the accused as aforesaid, aggrieved by which the accused preferred this appeal.3. p.w. 13 is an inquest mediator when the mandal revenue officer conducted inquest over the dead body of the deceased. as seen from ex. p-7-inquest report, the cause of death was due to the ..... . they did not support the case of the prosecution. nothing has been elicited in their cross-examination to connect the accused with the crime. p.ws. 9 and 10 are mediators for the scene of observation report and rough sketch. they too did not support the prosecution case. p.ws. 11 and 12 are projected as witnesses to speak about the .....