Gun Control or Gun Deletion
1 Comment / Second Amendment / By Dan Newman
The insanity of the House passing those two ridiculous unconstitutional gun control bills will NEVER fly: even if the Senate passes them and Biden signs them into law. How so? We have this little obstacle for such called the "Second Amendment" of the Constitution. So why was Pelosi dead set on passing those two bills? One reason only: to appease the gun control advocates.
The law would certainly be embroiled in Constitutional litigation. And, certainly, the first clause of a lawsuit to push for overturn of such a law would be a temporary injunction to prevent the law's enforcement.
Why then would the House push so hard to get them both passed? "Pay-back." Think about how much money Democrats have raised in campaign funds from far-left supporters: tens of millions of dollars. Also, Pelosi when hitting a roadblock, either in the Senate OR constitutional lawsuit will be able to say to those campaign resource holders, "We tried. But those Republicans are clinging to their guns. There's nothing we can do."
And the anti-gun campaign dollars continue to flow into Democrat campaigns.
Gun are NOT bad. People who own guns are certainly NOT bad. Using guns for murders IS bad. What IS bad is that politicians at federal, state, and local levels refuse to enforce the gun laws we have today.
Don't think that ATF and FBI agents could not track down a million or two of the illegal guns in the U.S. I know, that'd be a tall order. Remember: these are the guys that can find a bag of weed, the user, the dealer, and even the transporter of that bag into the country. They are able to enforce the laws they choose to enforce.
They'll never get every gun lawbreaker. Put that in the context of overall lawbreakers and it makes more sense. We all know they'll NEVER catch all lawbreakers of any kind. But what they accomplish when finding any number of these criminals is two-fold: they stop the lawbreakers from breaking any other laws, and they also send messages to the criminal community that these criminals are untouchable and will be hunted and arrested. It's a deterrent to new crimes.
Politicians and gun confiscation advocates rather pursue new laws that they know will never work. But the campaign dollars continue to come in regardless. Remember our motto about answers to all "Why's?" Follow The Money!
The Gun-Grab Processes
Watching the recent emotional speeches and marches supporting gun control, I can't shake a question that nags me: Would we be safer with fewer guns? Gun control advocates have an intuitive argument. Guns are an efficient way to commit murder. If we reduce the number of guns in society, we axiomatically will reduce murders.
Reducing gun violence is a desirable goal, particularly when one sees shooters mowing down children. After I thought about it, I realized the question of whether reducing guns in a society will lead to fewer murders is a testable hypothesis. You can measure gun ownership and murder rates. No two countries have the same gun laws or the same murder rates. So I jumped on Wikipedia to answer a question: Do countries with higher murder rates have more guns, and vice versa?
This question can be evaluated in a ratio: the number of legally owned guns per 100,000 versus the number of murders per 100,000. According to the theory, the ratio should be relatively stable. So countries with fewer guns will have fewer murders (a small number divided by a small number) and a country with more guns should have more murders (a big number divided by a big number).
I took the countries with the 100 highest murder rates. I added to the sample countries that compare to the United States culturally such as European countries, Australia, and Japan, etc. I deleted countries for which I could find no gun ownership statistics or countries that were small or obscure. My profile looked at 98 countries or a pretty solid slice of all the countries in the world. America is by far the country that owns the most guns per 100,000. In America, there are actually more guns than people. Our murder rate is much higher than that of our European counterparts. So far, the gun control hypothesis seems to be holding up.
But guns in America are very unlikely to be involved in murders. Our ratio of guns to murders is 20,696 guns privately and legally owned for every murder. Not every murder involves a gun. But the gun-control hypothesis suggests guns still make murder easier and more common.
The murder capital of the world is El Salvador. El Salvador has done a relatively good job rounding up legal guns. There are only 5,800 guns per 100,000 residents (compared to over 101,000 in America), yet El Salvador's ratio of guns to murders is a staggering 53. Every year, there's a murder for every 53rd gun in El Salvador.
The countries that have been most successful at limiting private, legal gun ownership are 1. Ethiopia, 2. Eritrea, 3. Haiti, 4. North Korea, and 5. Rwanda. Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Haiti all have higher murder rates than that of the United States. North Korea and Rwanda have slightly lower murder rates (4.4 and 4.5 per 100,000 respectively versus the United States at 4.88).
Let's look at the countries with the highest concentrations of gun ownership (excluding Yemen and Iraq as active war zones). Guns per murder in those countries are:
The United States at 20,967
Uruguay at 3,777
Norway at 55,893
France at 19,747
Austria at 59,608
Germany at 35,647
Switzerland at 35,435
New Zealand at 24,835
Greece at 26,471
Norway is a particularly interesting example. It has 10 times the gun ownership rate of the United Kingdom, but only half the murder rate.
When one excludes Iraq and Yemen, not one of the countries on the list of the 10 highest rates of gun ownership also appears on the list of the top ten highest murder rates. In fact, the countries with the highest murder rates have markedly low gun ownership rates.
El Savador (108.64 murders per 100,000/5800 guns per 100,000)
Honduras (63.75/6200)
Venezuela (57.15/10,700)
Jamaica (43.21/8,100)
Lesotho (38/2,700)
Belize (34.4/10,000)
South Africa (34.27/12,700
Guatemala (31.21/13,100)
Trinidad (30.88/1,600)
Bahamas (29.81/5,300)
It really doesn't matter how you slice this data, the conclusion is inescapable: high concentrations of private, legal gun ownership do not correlate positively to increased murders. Indeed, you can look at almost any slice of data and conclude exactly the opposite: higher private ownership of guns can be strongly correlated to lower murder rates.
The data also exposes some myths I have heard about gun control. For example, I've heard activists tout Australia, which supposedly banned all guns. Australia has advanced a number of gun control measures over the years. Nevertheless, according to the data, Australia has a rate of private ownership of guns of 13,100 per 100,000 and a murder rate of .98. Australia has almost twice as many guns per capita as the United Kingdom, for example, and a comparable murder rate. New Zealand has almost twice as many guns per capita as Australia but a lower crime rate.
Countries with both a low rate of private gun ownership and a low murder rate exist, but they are clearly data outliers. These include the Netherlands (3,900 guns per 100,000, for a murder rate of .61), the United Kingdom (6,200 guns per 100,000, for a murder rate of .92), Japan, and Portugal. Places like Norway, Austria, Switzerland, and Germany overwhelm those examples because they all have high rates of gun ownership and enviable crime rates.
An owner of a private legal gun in America measures as one of the most responsible in the world.
This isn't a perfect study. I didn't make the effort to include every country in the world, and I did skip many Asian countries. Nevertheless, it's worth considering why so many countries that have relatively successful programs of limiting private lawful ownership of guns are so dangerous and why countries with such high rates of private gun ownership are relatively safe. Even in a place like the United Kingdom, where the gun control seems to be effective (with a low murder rate of .92 per 100,000), it's arguable that the UK's peer countries such as Germany and Austria have had more success controlling crime in spite of allowing greater freedom of gun ownership.
The ratio of murders per gun works as a decent measure for how responsible a country's citizens are with their firearms. Measured in this light, an owner of a private legal gun in America measures as one of the most responsible in the world. A gun in America is 387 times less likely to be used in murder than in El Salvador. Even in Japan, which has one of the lowest murder and gun ownership rates in the world, there are ten times as many murders per gun as in America.
Before the U.S. government makes any measures actions regarding gun ownership illegal, it should be demonstrated that gun restrictions will have the desired effect. The perverse effect of increasing murder rates by reducing private gun ownership has been demonstrated in numerous studies. Places like Chicago, Washington D.C., and New York City have repeatedly experienced unintended consequences of aggressive gun control laws. They simply do not work.
When marchers scream to ban guns, they're pushing to make America more like El Salvador (1 murder for every 52 guns), Ethiopia (1 per 53), Honduras (1 per 88). All of these countries have succeeded in limiting gun ownership even if they can't keep their citizens safe. The numbers are clear: murders are less common when the victim might be armed.
It's no surprise that most mass shootings happen in one particular area: those which are "no-gun" zones. Think about it: those who plan those shootings know they'll be the only ones with zones so THEY won't be killed!
Do you think these bills/laws proposed have to do with stopping murders? Just as in every other country on Earth that has banned guns, murders don't stop. Why? Criminals will always have guns. What happens is the People, those law-abiding, constitutionally committed taxpayers, in large part believe in the Rule of Law, and don't carry guns. It doesn't keep people safe. It never has kept people safe.
By the way: doing so is un-Constitutional!
To Listen to or download today's (Monday, March 22, 2021) "TNN Live" Show, click on this link:
1 thought on "Gun Control or Gun Deletion"
Everett and Ann
Fantastic and factual article – thank you Dan.
1-866-37TRUTH
Archives Select Month January 2023 (25) December 2022 (25) November 2022 (31) October 2022 (28) September 2022 (25) August 2022 (27) July 2022 (24) June 2022 (25) May 2022 (26) April 2022 (28) March 2022 (29) February 2022 (23) January 2022 (29) December 2021 (27) November 2021 (27) October 2021 (28) September 2021 (32) August 2021 (30) July 2021 (28) June 2021 (24) May 2021 (27) April 2021 (26) March 2021 (29) February 2021 (27) January 2021 (25) December 2020 (32) November 2020 (24) October 2020 (28) September 2020 (26) August 2020 (28) July 2020 (27) June 2020 (29) May 2020 (28) April 2020 (31) March 2020 (30) February 2020 (28) January 2020 (29) December 2019 (23) November 2019 (26) October 2019 (27) September 2019 (19) August 2019 (19) July 2019 (26) June 2019 (21) May 2019 (21) April 2019 (21) March 2019 (22) February 2019 (20) January 2019 (21) December 2018 (25) November 2018 (21) October 2018 (24) September 2018 (19) August 2018 (25) July 2018 (30) June 2018 (22) May 2018 (20) April 2018 (16) March 2018 (20) February 2018 (18) January 2018 (19) December 2017 (21) November 2017 (18) October 2017 (25) September 2017 (24) August 2017 (29) July 2017 (28) June 2017 (26) May 2017 (32) April 2017 (35) March 2017 (37) February 2017 (26) January 2017 (15) December 2016 (1)
Categories Select Category 2016 Presidential Election (25) 2020 Election (141) 2022 Election (9) 2022 Elections (5) American and Americans (303) Critical Race Theory (CRT) (6) ANTIFA (16) Biden Corruption Syndicate (13) Big Tech (7) Black Lives Matter (16) Bulletpoints (157) Cancel Culture (5) Christian Persecution (3) Climate Change (8) Congress (88) Coronavirus (175) Mask Mandates (3) Vaccines (12) Criminal Justice (39) Education (4) Elections (71) Voter Fraud (7) Freedom of Speech (13) Funny of the Week (23) Genocide (5) Great Reset (4) Gun Control (10) Healthcare (35) Immigration (81) Impeachment (46) Impeachment: Part II (2) It's the Economy, Stupid (20) Joe Biden (72) Kelleigh Nelson (30) Law Enforcement (13) Middle East Politics (2) Obama (5) Podcasts (376) Politically Speaking…… (504) Fake News and Its Results (43) Political Corruption (233) President Trump's Actions (126) Racism (26) White Supremacy (3) Right to Life/Pro Choice (21) Second Amendment (3) Sex Trafficking (7) Child Sex Abuse (4) Social Media (1) Socialism or Socialism-Light (10) The Judiciary (6) The U.S. Department of Justice (45) The U.S. Economy (7) TNN Live (9) Totalitarianism (18) Tuesday Bullet Points (4) U.S. Intelligence Community (2) U.S. Supreme Court (33) Uncategorized (64) United States and/or World History (16) United States Foreign Policy (24) United States Military (4) Violence In The Streets (18) War (11)
Subscribe to TruthNewsNetwork.org
Copyright © 2023 Truth News Network