Canada | About Us | Careers | Contact Us | Help
You are here: Home Page > Arts & Humanities > Philosophy > Practical Ethics > Bioethics & Medical Ethics > Debating Climate Ethics
5-1/2 x 8-1/4 inches
This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online - view abstracts and keywords at book and chapter level.
Debating Climate Ethics
Stephen M. Gardiner and David A. Weisbach
Debating Ethics
Debate about climate ethics between two leading scholars on the topic
Presents views central to understanding modern climate change policy
One author argues from the standpoint of ethics and justice, while the other from that of national self-interest
In this volume, Stephen M. Gardiner and David A. Weisbach present arguments for and against the relevance of ethics to global climate policy. Gardiner argues that climate change is fundamentally an ethical issue, since it is an early instance of a distinctive challenge to ethical action (the perfect moral storm), and ethical concerns (such as with justice, rights, political legitimacy, community and humanity's relationship to nature) are at the heart of many of the decisions that need to be made. Consequently, climate policy that ignores ethics is at risk of "solving" the wrong problem, perhaps even to the extreme of endorsing forms of climate extortion. This is especially true of policy based on narrow forms of economic self-interest. By contrast, Weisbach argues that existing ethical theories are not well suited to addressing climate change. As applied to climate change, existing ethical theories suffer from internal logical problems and suggest infeasible strategies. Rather than following failed theories or waiting indefinitely for new and better ones, Weisbach argues that central motivation for climate policy is straightforward: it is in their common interest for people and nations to agree to policies that dramatically reduce emissions to prevent terrible harms.
Part I By Stephen M. Gardiner
1. How Will We be Remembered?
2. Betraying the Future
3. Who Are We and What Do We Want?
4. Justice vs. Extortion
Part II By David A. Weisbach
5. Introduction to Part II
6. Climate Policy and Self-Interest
7. The Role of Claims of Justice in Climate Change Policy
8. Summing Up
Part III Responses
9. 'The Feasible is Political'
10. Weisbach Responds to Gardiner
Stephen M. Gardiner is Professor of Philosophy and Ben Rabinowitz Endowed Professor of the Human Dimensions of the Environment at the University of Washington, Seattle. He is the author of A Perfect Moral Storm (Oxford, 2011), editor of Virtue Ethics, Old and New (Cornell, 2005), and co-editor of the Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics (Oxford, in press) and Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford, 2010). His research focuses on global environmental problems, future generations and virtue ethics.
David A. Weisbach is the Walter J Blum Professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Senior Fellow at the University of Chicago Computation Institute and Argonne National Laboratories. Weisbach's research primarily focuses on issues related to taxation and on policy aspects of climate change.
Weisbach received his BS in Mathematics from the University of Michigan in 1985; a Masters in Advance Study (Mathematics) from Wolfson College, Cambridge in 1986; and a JD from Harvard Law School in 1989. After graduating from law school, Weisbach clerked for Judge Joel M. Flaum of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and worked as an associate in the law firm of Miller & Chevalier. In 1992, Weisbach joined the Department of Treasury where he worked as an attorney-advisor in the Office of the Tax Legislative Counsel and, subsequently, as associate tax legislative counsel. In 1996, Weisbach was appointed Associate Professor of Law at Georgetown Law Center and joined the Chicago faculty in 1998.
"One of the most refreshing aspects of Gardiner and Weisbach's contribution to this debate is that both of them--Gardiner a philosopher, Weisbach an economist--think that rapid decarbonization must be the paramount aim of climate policy...this is an extremely valuable book and I recommend it warmly. Both authors display an admirable tenacity, courage, forbearance, and intelligence. Their debate marks a significant advance in our attempts to grapple with this most serious of issues." -- Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Debating Pornography
Andrew Altman and Lori Watson
AIDS, Women, and the Next Generation
Ruth R. Faden, Gail Geller, and Madison Powers
The Heart of Human Rights
Allen Buchanan
Social Science Theory for Environmental Sustainability
Marc J. Stern
The Human Radiation Experiments
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
Anscombe's Intention
John Schwenkler
Debating Brain Drain
Gillian Brock and Michael Blake
Women and Children in Health Care
Mary Briody Mahowald
Keith Somerville
Debating Education
Harry Brighouse and David Schmidtz
The Black Stork
Martin S. Pernick
Equality and Tradition
Panda Nation
E. Elena Songster
Arts & Humanities > Philosophy > Practical Ethics > Bioethics & Medical Ethics
Arts & Humanities > Philosophy > Social & Political Philosophy
Science & Mathematics > Environmental Science > Environmentalist & Conservationist Organizations
Science & Mathematics > Environmental Science > Social Impact of Environmental Issues