brain computer interface and international law
http://www.sevenhorizons.org/docs/WhiteBraveNewWorld.pdf
THE LAW and MIND CONTROL – A LOOK AT THE LAW AND GOVERNMENT MIND CONTROL
18 U.S.C. 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002332---h000-.html
CIA implanted electrodes in brains of unsuspecting soldiers, suit alleges
Guide to the Second Amendment and landmark Supreme Court cases 
https://ammo.com/articles/second-amendment-supreme-court-cases-guide
CIA torture survivors sue psychologists who designed infamous program
Organs taken from patients that doctors were pressured to declare brain dead: suit
Secret Human Testing Revealed in Declassified U.S. Army Documents; Lawsuit Follows - Activist Post
Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
ELLEN MARIANI'S RICO SUIT AGAINST BUSH ET AL - TO SEEK JUSTICE AND THE TRUTH AS TO HOW AND WHY THE EVENTS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, OCCURRED
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR402A.html
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. STANLEY, 483 U.S. 669 (1987) 483 U.S. 669 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. STANLEY CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 86-393. Argued April 21, 1987 Decided June 25, 1987 Respondent, a serviceman, volunteered for what was ostensibly a chemical warfare testing program, but in which he was secretly administered lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) pursuant to an Army plan to test the effects of the drug on human subjects, whereby he suffered severe personality changes that led to his discharge and the dissolution of his marriage. Upon being informed by the Army that he had been given LSD, respondent filed a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit. The District Court granted the Government summary judgment on the ground that the suit was barred by the doctrine of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 , which precludes governmental FTCA liability for injuries to servicemen resulting from activity "incident to service." Although agreeing with this holding, the Court of Appeals remanded the case upon concluding that respondent had at least a colorable constitutional claim under the doctrine of Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , whereby a violation of constitutional rights can give rise to a damages action against the offending federal officials even in the absence of a statute authorizing such relief, unless there are "special factors counselling hesitation" or an "explicit congressional declaration" of another, exclusive remedy. Respondent then amended his complaint to add Bivens claims and attempted to resurrect his FTCA claim. Although dismissing the latter claim, the District Court refused to dismiss the Bivens claims, rejecting, inter alia, the Government's argument that the same considerations giving rise to the Feres doctrine should constitute "special factors" barring a Bivens action….In February 1958, James B. Stanley, a master sergeant in the Army stationed at Fort Knox, Kentucky, volunteered to participate in a program ostensibly designed to test the effectiveness of protective clothing and equipment as defenses against chemical warfare. He was released from his then-current duties and went to the Army's Chemical Warfare Laboratories at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland. Four times that month, Stanley was secretly administered doses of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), pursuant to an Army plan to study the effects of the drug on human subjects. According to his Second Amended Complaint (the allegations of which we accept for purposes of this decision), as a result of the LSD exposure, Stanley has suffered from hallucinations and periods of incoherence and memory loss, was impaired in his military performance, and would on occasion "awake from sleep at night and, without reason, violently beat his wife and children, later being unable to recall the entire incident." App. 5. He was discharged from the Army in 1969. One year later, his marriage dissolved because of the personality changes wrought by the LSD. December 10, 1975, the Army sent Stanley a letter soliciting his cooperation in a study of the long-term effects of LSD on "volunteers who participated" in the 1958 tests. [483 U.S. 669, 672] This was the Government's first notification to Stanley that he had been given LSD during his time in Maryland. After an administrative claim for compensation was denied by the Army, Stanley filed suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 2671 et seq., alleging negligence in the administration, supervision, and subsequent monitoring of the drug testing program. http://laws.findlaw.com/us/483/669.html
CIA Supreme Court Cases
U.S. Supreme Court CIA v. SIMS, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 471 U.S. 159 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ET AL. v. SIMS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 83-1075. Argued December 4, 1984 Decided April 16, 1985 ….Between 1953 and 1966, the Central Intelligence Agency financed a wide-ranging project, code-named MKULTRA, concerned with "the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior." The [471 U.S. 159, 162] program consisted of some 149 subprojects which the Agency contracted out to various universities, research foundations, and similar institutions. At least 80 institutions and 185 private researchers participated. Because the Agency funded MKULTRA indirectly, many of the participating individuals were unaware that they were dealing with the Agency.
SCHLUND VS BUSH
WWW.MINDCONTROLFORUMS/V/SCHLUNDLAWSUIT.HTM
http://osdir.com/ml/culture.discuss.cia-drugs/2005-11/msg00224.html
MECCA VS. USA.
http://www.us-government-torture.com
http://www.secretangel.tv
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON OFFENSIVE MICROWAVE
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/international-committee-vs-us.htm
PARENTS CLAIM PSYCHIATRIST TRIED TO TURN SON INTO KILLER
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg57275.html
THE RULE OF LAW
WITH ALEX JONES/RANDY KELTON
http://www.justgetthere.us/blog/archives/Alex-Jones-TV-with-Randy-Kelton-Rule-Of-Law.html
JURIS-IMPRUDENCE
http://jurisimprudence.com/
14 YEAR NIGHTMARE ENDS
FOR EX- POLICE OFFICER
http://www.truthinjustice.org/steve-manning.htm
Surgeon indicted over illegal implants..toxic allert! Mentor -silicone, FDA,
http://www.implants.clic.net/tony/Ant1/B/18.htm
A LOOK AT THE LAW AND GOVERNMENT MIND CONTROL THROUGH FIVE CASES http://bit.ly/6usIgn
GOOGLE "BNSF v Rob Shipley, DA 11-0655";
fisa lawsuit
mayfield etal. vs. us
http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/joj/fisa/mayfield2007.pdf
18)Eric Griffin http://www.scribd.com/doc/25889455/Eric-Griffin-Mind-Control-Arrest-and-Appeal-to-Senator-Reid
VIEW THE FOLLOWING CASES ON LINE FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS, GANG STALKING, MIND CONTROL AND V2K
1) NORM RABIN'S COURT CASE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT/EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -
CASE NO: CV-93-3681, CASE NO: APPEAL NO: 936370, CASE NO: CV 984435
Brief Synopsis - this case is regarding electromagnetic assaults, gang stalking, mind control, etc.
2) DAVID LARSON'S COURT CASE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT/CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - CASE NO: CV-09-01296
Brief Synopsis - this case is regarding implants and residue left in his body from implants.
3)JAMES WALBERT'S COURT CASE
DISTRICT COURT OF SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS - CASE NO: 08-DM8647
Brief Synopsis - this case is regarding electromagnetic assaults and gang stalking
4) JESUS MENDOZA COURT CASE-CASE NO: (S.D. Tex) M03-38, U.S. S. CT. CASE NO: 04-9908, U.S. COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CASE NO: 04-40095, CASE NO: 06-0155, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CASE NO: 06-5108
Brief Synopsis - this case is regarding electromagnetic assaults and gang stalking, including assaulting his children
5) CONNIE MARSHALL - U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS CASE NO: 09-733C
Brief Synopsis - this case is regarding electromagnetic assaults, gang stalking, destruction of property (car engine and radiator, washer, dryer, electric igniter switch on heater in home, destruction of treadmill, computers, fax machines,business and job, intercepting mail (even registered and certified), attacking my pets, intercepting email and tele., changing my birth certificate, manipulating social security records, increasing debt, constant torture, torment and harassment, etc. NOTE: Ms. Marshall now has several pending cases regarding related conspiracy in that the Commonwealth of Kentucky is participating and creating the infrastructure to allow these crimes to be committed against her. Ms. Marshall has signed certified receipts and/or taped the Officials on every level in Kentucky stating, "We have been told not to assist you," and Danny Lawless, Police Officer stated, "No one is going to assist you, because you are Redlined."
6)JOHN ST CLAIR AKWEI - CIVIL ACTION 92-0449
Brief Synopsis: This lawsuit reveals a frightening array of technologies and programs designed to keep tabs on individuals.
7) STAN J. CATERBONE - U. S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO: 05-2288
8) DONALD M. FRIEDMAN – CASE NO: 06-CV-2125
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL DISTRICT Brief Synopsis - this case is regarding directed energy and microwave weapons
9) JOHN FINCH - REF: OTP-CR-70/07 & EM_T01_OTP-CR-00122_07 & EM_Ack_OTP-CR-742_09 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)
Brief Synopsis - Electromagnetic Torture and Abuse
10)LAMBROS VS. FAULKNER, ET AL - CIVIL CASE NO. 98-1621 (dsd/jmm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MINNESOTA
Brief Synopsis:Torture, Forced Implantation and Transmitters in head. Swedish doctors familiar with treating victims that have been implanted stated that foreign bodies do exist in Mr. Lambros and that they are most likely transmitters. www.lambros.name/ricosuit4/rico24.html
11)GERAL W. SOSBEE Ex FBI Agent - WRIT OF CERTIORARI NO. 01-182
Brief Synopsis: Electromagnetic Torture
12)BRIAN WRONGE - EASTERN DISTRICT COURT NO: (?)
Brief Synopsis: A doctor confirmed that he had metallic or paramagnetic foreign body in the region of the anterior left axilla. An Anatomist stated: 'When I pass the microphone over his body it picks up vibration and white noise sound waves that would be emitted by computer. When we had been doing this for a minute or so the sound dropped as though someone had turned down the frequency somewhere. This happened in the area under his arm, near his forehead and in some places along the vertebral column." It was also stated that these chips are probably operated by some transmitter that the body sends sound waves out to.http://www.lambros.name/pdf/citysunarticle_wronge.pdf
13)THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON MICROWAVE WEAPONS (ICOMW) – HARLAN GIRARD U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NO. (?)
Brief Synopsis: Class Action Lawsuit regarding Offensive Microwave Weapons
14)JONES VS. AULT CITE 67 F.R.D. 124 (1974) CASE NO. CV474 – 279 AND CASE NO. 474 -293
U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTH DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, SAVANNAH DISTRICT
Brief Synopsis: Brain controlled and monitored by Electric or Parabolic Sound. Surveillance System tuned to brain want only monitors and combs body picking up sound and voices.
15)HUANG SI MING, HONG KONG PROFESSOR SUES THE U. S. FOR MIND CONTROL (FILED IN 1996)
Brief Synopsis: Huang claims that one of the devices in his teeth can read his thoughts and talk to his mind while he is sleeping.
16)SOLEIL MAVIS, http://www.peacepink.ning.com
Soleil mavis has filed several lawsuits regarding, "Remote Mind Control Abuses and Torture."
A. International Criminal Court, Reference No. EM_T01_OTP-CR-00122_07
B. United Nations Petitions Team - Results - No Reply, No Reference Number (Filed Lawsuit 2007)
C. The Registrar European Court of Human Rights - Counsel of Europe (Sent by Letter Dec. 2009)
Results: No Reply Yet, No Case Number D. Curia – To: The Registry - Rue Du Fort Niedergrunewald - L-2925 Luxembourg (Sent by Letter Dec. 2009) Case Ref: No: T-507109AJ
17)JAMES GEE - REFERENCE NO: EM_ACK_OTP-CR-742_09
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Head of the Information and Evidence Unit - Office of the Prosecutor - P.O. Box 19519
2500 CM the Hague, The Netherlands
MANLAUNCHES
$2 BILLION SUIT AGAINST CO,S &R.C.M.P.
http://www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=b962b811-4230-4aef-8176-7c54a0e28ccc
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/columnists/article5204730.ece
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2131489/posts
http://www.findacase.com
MONTREAL COURT
CASE NABS CIA
FOR ILLEGAL
MIND-CONTROL
http://www.rense.c/general69/mind.htm
HUMAN RESEARCH
PROTECTION ACT
( SEN.JOHN GLENN)
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/s193.htm
The AUTHORITY FOR FINES (DAMAGES) CAUSED BY CRIMES BY
GOVERNMENT OFFICERS. These Damages were determined by GOVERNMENT itself
for the violation listed.
Breach Penalty Authority
VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED PROPER WARRANT(S) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED RIGHT OF REASONABLE
DEFENSE ARGUMENTS $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DEFENSE EVIDENCE (RECORDS) $250,000.00 18 USC 357I
DENIED RIGHT TO TRUTH
IN EVIDENCE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
SLAVERY (Forced Compliance
to contracts not held) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED PROVISIONS IN THE
CONSTITUTION $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
TREASON (combined above actions). $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
GENOCIDE $1,000,000.00 18 USC 1091
MISPRISION OF FELONY $500.00 18 USC 4
CONSPIRACY $10,000.00 18 USC 241
EXTORTION $5,000.00 18 USC 872
MAIL THREATS $5,000.00 18 USC 876
FRAUD $10,000.00 18 USC 1001
FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS $10,000.00 18 USC 1001
PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1621
SUBORNATION OF PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1622
GRAND THEFT (18 USC 2112) each $250,000.00
To determine multiply no. of counts by damage 18 USC 3571
RACKETEERING (Criminal) $25,000.00 18 USC 1963
RACKETEERING (Civil)
Wages Taken $x3 = 5? 18 USC 1964
(Sustained Damages [total] x 3)
Thirty-seven (37) Constitutional violations from Count 1: = $9,250,000.00 Damages
Dealing with claims of "immunity."
Any claim of " immunity" is a fraud because, if valid, it would prevent removal from office
for crimes against the people, which removal is authorized or even mandated under U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section IV; as well as 18 USC 241, 42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986, and
other state Constitutions.
Precedents of Law established by COURT cases, which are in violation of law,
render violations of law legally unassailable. Such a situation violates several specifically
stated intents and purposes of the Constitution set forth in the Preamble; to establish
justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the-blessings of liberty. For JUDGES, or
anyone in any branch of government.