Forests, Trees and Agroforestry
Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance
What is FTA?
Independent steering committee
FTA newsletters
Program documents
FTA briefs
FTA workshops
Operational priorities
All priorities
Plantations and tree crop commodities
Enhanced nutrition and food security
Biodiversity, safeguarding and conservation
Nationally determined contributions
Bioenergy and biomaterials
Blue carbon and peatlands
Landscape governance
Silvopastoral systems
Market-based agroforestry-forestry
Farm-forest policy interface
Livelihood trajectory modelling and assessment
Inclusive finance and business models
Innovating finance for sustainable landscapes
Public and private commitments to zero deforestation
Orphan tree crops
Effectiveness of approaches to sustainable supply
Quality of FTA research for development
All flagships
Flagship 1: Tree genetic resources
Flagship 2: Livelihood systems
Flagship 3: Sustainable value chains and investments
Flagship 4: Landscape dynamics, productivity and resilience
Flagship 5: Climate change mitigation and adaptation
Monitoring, evaluation, learning and impact assessment (MELIA)
Research story
GLF session acknowledges difference between tree and land tenure, aims to enhance landscapes
enable_in_flagship_1
FTA COMMUNICATIONS TEAM
A woman roasts shea nuts, before grinding them into a fine paste, in Burkina Faso. Photo by O. Girard/CIFOR
Tenure rights to trees are entangled with, but different from, those to land, meaning both must be acknowledged to incentivize stewardship of the landscape by local communities, said delegates at the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) in Nairobi on Aug. 29-30.
Thus, land tenure rights, which are widely recognized as being central to advancing sustainable development goals, are only one part of the picture.
This was one of the main takeaways from the panel Rights, access, and values: trees in shifting economic and political contexts – new insights from sub-Saharan Africa, cohosted by the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) and the CGIAR Research Program on People, Institutions and Markets (PIM) at the forum. The panel was chaired by Frank Place, PIM Director.
"We need to do more work to differentiate tree tenure from land tenure," said Andrew Wardell, senior research associate at the Center for International Forest Research (CIFOR) and coauthor of a study exploring shifts in shea tenure in Burkina Faso.
ACCESS TO SHEA
Claiming tenure over the trees one has planted is a widespread convention across Africa, but shea trees grow wild, so farmers have historically selected and protected them on their lands.
25% of world's surface can be better protected with rights
Can forests and smallholders live in harmony in Africa?
Cameroon forest superfood scores best for women's health
Researchers questioned whether a shea tree belongs to the family that first selected and saved the tree, the family that protected and managed it afterwards. Considerations also included determining whether shea belongs to the wild tree category, in which case, access to the tree is closely linked to access to land.
How these concerns are addressed determines who stands to gain access to, and reap benefits from, a natural resource. Particularly, since customary institutions that formerly regulated access to land and trees are being weakened by new, and rapidly-changing social and economic contexts.
Shea nuts dry after being freed from their pulp and washed in Burkina Faso. Photo by O. Girard/CIFOR
"Internal migration driven by climate change, and a boom in the shea trade are two of the key issues playing out in Burkina Faso as a key shea producer country," explained Wardell. Traditionally, the kernels were seen as an abundant communal resource, which women collected to derive a reliable year-round source of income.
Yet, customary rules are now failing to keep pace with the new, highly competitive context, noted Wardell. In southwestern Burkina Faso, men increasingly claim ownership of the trees growing in their fields; there are fewer communal areas where access to shea is open to all; and access to an increasingly scarce and marketable resource is pitting first-settlers against new-comers, internal migrants that flee desertification in northern regions of the country.
Researchers observed that "first-comers" try to link access to shea with access to land, which they control. In response, "late-comers" claim access to the trees they protect and manage, or argue shea's wild nature makes it a communal resource as part of their strategies to re-negotiate their rights of access.
NEW POWER RELATIONSHIPS
Women's access to trees is also changing in Uganda. "Youth are cutting shea to obtain timber and fuelwood regardless of customary rules and a government ban," said Concepta Mukasa, representative of the Association of Uganda Professional Women in Agriculture and the Environment.
"The more marketable shea becomes, the bigger the threat to the trees and to women's livelihoods, so we are helping them come together to advocate for their access rights," Mukasa explained.
On the bright side, women from the Baganda community in central Uganda are now starting to gain access to Natal fig or "Mutuba" (Ficus natalensis). "The tree used to signal chief-tenancy, so they were not allowed from to plant it or even harvest its fruits; women in that area are not supposed to climb trees," she pointed out.
Panelists from Ghana (Alberg Katako representing Civic Response) and Kenya (Ben Chikamai representing the Network for Natural Gums and Resins in Africa) echoed similar challenges at the intersection of tenure rights to land and to trees – a tension which increases with the commoditization of natural resources and population pressure. Additional welcome comments on the panel discussion were provided by Ruth Meinzen-Dick from PIM who has a long history of working on land tenure rights and collective action.
Over 70 percent of people in sub-Saharan Africa depend on forests and woodlands for their livelihoods, but two thirds of the continental land-mass are degraded. In this context, a more nuanced approach to tenure rights will have to be part of the equation to build resilient landscapes and livelihoods, agreed the panelists.
By Gloria Palleres, originally published at GLF's Landscape News.
Summary and discussion: Inclusive finance interviews
Forests in Flux Exploring Park–People Conflicts in Colombia through a Social Lens
Brazil nut forest concessions in the Peruvian Amazon: success or failure?
Performance-based Financing for Promoting Resilient Ecosystems
The right to food? Protected areas, access and food security
Operationalising the landscape approach for biodiversity benefits: Policy, practice and people
Incorporating Blue Carbon in REDD+
Pineapples and peatlands
Gender, land shortage and lack of tree access across an international border
Securing customary rights to forests in Maluku province, Indonesia
Firewood for income in a degrading landscape
The CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) is the world's largest research for development program to enhance the role of forests, trees and agroforestry in sustainable development and food security and to address climate change. CIFOR leads FTA in partnership with Bioversity International, CATIE, CIRAD, ICRAF, INBAR and TBI.
FTA's work is supported by the CGIAR Trust Fund.
© 2019 @ CGIAR Research Program - Forests, Trees and Agroforestry Terms of use and privacy policy