Archive for the 'love' Category
Next up, a most miscellaneous miscellany
Sunday, May 5th, 2019
[ by Charles Camerom — no longer spending much time scanning for chyrons, but there's still plenty of interest in my feed — note the great quote from A Man for All Seasons ]
Unbelievable!
From Trump's 2020 campaign manager:
Loved watching the crowd fill up for the 547th Rally in Green Bay. There has never been and probably never will be a movement like this again. Only God could deliver such a savior to our nation and only God could allow me to help. God bless America! pic.twitter.com/PBata3mB14
— Brad Parscale (@parscale) April 30, 2019
Less bogus religion, more mundane reality:
Stunning: Clint Watts offers an "life imitating art imitating life" (and I quote) instance on Meet the Press — a short, sharp overview of how Putin trolls the US electorate with malicious intent:
That interview was shot a while back, but is worth revisiting today. Omn May 1st, Watts spoke of a "war game" and it was in searching (unsuccessfully) for that clip that I stumbled on this one.
Let's follow that up with a tweet-repeated ouroboros chaser:
It's time to investigate the investigators in this miscarriage of justice: "Ohr's revelation about his wife adds yet another example of people connected to the Clinton machine flooding the FBI with anti-Trump Russia research during the 2016 election."https://t.co/uevwv43rRV
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) February 20, 2019
Somewhere I saw:
The flase narrative got out of the gate long before the truth did ..A tic-tac-toe pin for all of the games played by Mnuchin, Barr and Trump ..
impeachment is an explosive undertaking and can ricochet in all sorts of complicated directions ..
Mehdi Hasan: The Democrats bring a knife tom a gun-fight, the Republicans bring a rocket-launcher ..
Charlotte Alter: Buttegeig speaks Democratic with a Republican accent..
Mike Barnickle (re Biden): It's hideously early in the campaign. I mean, it's not even spring training, forget the exhibition games that have yet toi be played. It's very early, so he's got a big bounce from name recogmnition ..
Rick Wilson: It's an interesting play (for Dems). I think if they camn draw the arc from nationalism to populism to statism to authoritarianism to Trumpism, they've got something there ..
Flannery: We have a crime syndicate in the west wing ..
I think they could have hammered him and sickled him to death ..*****
I'll not bother to load the video clips themselves, but for the record, here's Trump inviting Russia to hack Hillary's emails, and Hillary inviting China to hack Trump's tax returns — a DoubleQuote, albeit an obvious one — structurally equivalent to a cinematic flashback. But here's another DQ, just a little less obvious perhaps:
Chris Matthews, incidentally, is on a roll comparing William Barr's situation to that of Roper in A Man for All Seasons by Robert Bolt. Thomas More reproves Roper for his infidelity with the words:
For Wales? Why Richard, it profit a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. . . but for Wales!
That's the same Will Roper to whom More addresses his celebrated speech:
nd when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!"
That William Safire-Barr business, from Cover-up Attorney General Bill Barr strikes again — one of those crucial rhymes:
Back in 1992, the last time Bill Barr was U.S. attorney general, iconic New York Times writer William Safire referred to him as "Coverup-General Barr" because of his role in burying evidence of then-President George H.W. Bush's involvement in "Iraqgate" and "Iron-Contra."
— and another Barr quote, from The Complicated Friendship of Robert Mueller and William Barr:
Figliuzzi described the dynamic between Mueller and Barr as one of "a boy scout" (Mueller) versus "a street fighter" (Barr). … "Mueller is a guy who plays by the rules, and he was playing by the rules in this report," Figliuzzi told me. "He kind of trusts that the system will take care of itself, and he kicks his report over across the street to DOJ. That's where things go south."
Another tweet:
One of the many things I heard Booker say tonight was "Love," in public, is "Justice."
He spoke about the 2020 election being a "moral moment."#CoryBooker has risen enormously in my estimation, tonight.
— Tyko Kihlstedt (@SwampGreen) April 30, 2019
Certainly a striking formulation, that — "Love, in public, is justice.." I heard that too, and had to chew on it, which is why I googled and found this tweet: the one thing this isn't is conflict-avoidant.
Okay, here's a John Bolton triple:
Dexter Filkin's a must-read — but his current NYorker piece leads us back to two other striking Bolton headers:
Bolton is hardly my favorite, but drawing the attention of Filkins, Gourevitch and Robin wright is surely a mark of honor of some kind.
Dexter Filkins, John Bolton on the Warpath
Philip Gourevitch, What Is John Bolton's Bully-Pulpit Attack Really About?
Robin Wright, John ("Bomb Iran") Bolton, the New Warmonger in the White House
Posted in barr, Charles Cameron, chyron, clint watts, donald trump, FBI, john bolton, justice, love, new yorker, putin, Religion, theater, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Next up, a most miscellaneous miscellany
Two Valentines for 2019
Thursday, February 14th, 2019
[ by Charles Cameron — one from Mueller, one from Parkland ]
Here's one of those tiny little heart-shaped candies — its image enlarged, so you can read the message on it:
Courtesy of Meet the Press yesterday..
And let's not forget that a year ago, Valentine's Day was shattered for the students, teachers, staff and neighbors of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida:
Each in our measure, the rest of us mourned with them.
Posted in Charles Cameron, gun, gun control, love, mueller, public school, redacted, Uncategorized, Writing | Comments Off on Two Valentines for 2019
Better bring a sword to a love fight?
[ by Charles Cameron — or, a samurai's weapon glistens more brightly than an assault rifle ]
And in case your object that the proposed assault weapon ban (upper image above) is stereotypically associated wwith active shooters in schools, not issues of love and romance, take this, from Does anyone have the right to sex? in the LRB:
On 23 May 2014, Elliot Rodger, a 22-year-old college dropout, became the world's most famous 'incel' – involuntary celibate. The term can, in theory, be applied to both men and women, but in practice it picks out not sexless men in general, but a certain kind of sexless man: the kind who is convinced he is owed sex, and is enraged by the women who deprive him of it. Rodger stabbed to death his two housemates, Weihan Wang and Cheng Hong, and a friend, George Chen, as they entered his apartment on Seville Road in Isla Vista, California. Three hours later he drove to the Alpha Phi sorority house near the campus of UC Santa Barbara. He shot three women on the lawn, killing two of them, Katherine Cooper and Veronika Weiss. Rodger then went on a drive-by shooting spree through Isla Vista, killing Christopher Michaels-Martinez, also a student at UCSB, with a single bullet to the chest inside a Deli Mart, and wounding 14 others. He eventually crashed his BMW coupé at an intersection. He was found dead by the police, having shot himself in the head.
It just didn't have a headline tht would have made any sense in the DoubleQuote!
Okay, gunds and swords.
There's also the question of whether the pen is mightier than the sword, of course — even the samurain sword? — or to coin a phrase:
Don't bring ink to a blood fight
Posted in blood, Character, Charles Cameron, Doublequotes, gun, gun control, love, pen sword, romance, sex, sword, sword gun, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Better bring a sword to a love fight?
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Parkland
[ by Charles Cameron — a smattering of thoughts about the most recent shooting ]
Wednesday, 14 February, 2018:
It was Valentine's Day, among the family members grieving at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Parkland, in Broward County, Florida (upper panel, below):
— and it was Ash Wednesday, when ashes from palm crosses representing Christ's hosannah-filled entrance into Jerusalem are smeared on the foreheads of believers (lower panel, above)..
Daily Herald, Sheriff: 17 killed in Florida high school shooting, image 2
A day set apart for love, a day for mourning. And each in turn could provide a potential shooter with an added impulse to act on this particular day.
Control is the issue:
But where? Should we be figuring out how to control youthful impulses, somewhere in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex and the amygdala (upper panel, below) —
— or how to control the access to semi-automatic weapons of people who are slipping dangerously into forms of mental distress, while respecting both the right to privacy and the right to bear arms (lower panel, above).
Daily News, Florida gunman accused of killing 17 in high school massacre
Daily News, These are the victims of the Florida high school shooting
Impulse control, or gun control?
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School is too much of a mouthful: Parkland will be the name etched in memory, alongside Columbine, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook. Such names are invoked, not spoken.
Is there perhaps a connection between the school shooter issue and the national conversation on sexual harassment, such that a major shift in attitudes towards sexual harassment would naturally translate to, or facilitate, a similar shift regarding gun control?
Are these in fact two conversations — waves on the same wave-front — "whose time (for change) has come"?
Would each benefit from their being discussed together?
Posted in 2018, Charles Cameron, christianity, Doublequotes, gun, gun control, love, neuroscience, parkland, public school, Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Kayfabe is an analog for war and love maybe, not a model
[ by Charles Cameron — hat-tip to Ferdinando Buscema, magician and therefore cognitive science specialist extraordinaire ]
Occasionally one reads a truly stunning article — stunning, I mean stunnng.
Eric R. Weinstein's 2011 Edge answer, WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY'S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT? is one such article, and as such I have retained the full caps in its title.
The theoretical background is :
Evolutionary biologists Richard Alexander and Robert Trivers have recently emphasized that it is deception rather than information that often plays the decisive role in systems of selective pressures. Yet most of our thinking continues to treat deception as something of a perturbation on the exchange of pure information, leaving us unprepared to contemplate a world in which fakery may reliably crowd out the genuine. In particular, humanity's future selective pressures appear likely to remain tied to economic theory which currently uses as its central construct a market model based on assumptions of perfect information.
If we are to take selection more seriously within humans, we may fairly ask what rigorous system would be capable of tying together an altered reality of layered falsehoods in which absolutely nothing can be assumed to be as it appears. Such a system, in continuous development for more than a century, is known to exist and now supports an intricate multi-billion dollar business empire of pure hokum. It is known to wrestling's insiders as "Kayfabe".
Evolutionary biology, okay — I have other preferences for go-to model theory, but this one seems popular among non-magical realists on the cutting edge.. and the analog proposed in this article is kayfabe.
Which is?
What can be seen as "tying together an altered reality of layered falsehoods in which absolutely nothing can be assumed to be as it appears"? What, in other words, can model all these altered realities? And kayfabe cannot be the answer, since it is one of those altered realities itself. No — for sure, it may provide a superb analog for professional wrestling and those others — "war, finance, love, politics and science" — mentioned later in the piece:
Kayfabrication (the process of transition from reality towards Kayfabe) arises out of attempts to deliver a dependably engaging product for a mass audience while removing the unpredictable upheavals that imperil participants. As such Kayfabrication is a dependable feature of many of our most important systems which share the above two characteristics such as war, finance, love, politics and science.
— but it cannot model them.
Let's take a closer look at the analogy, though:
What makes Kayfabe remarkable is that it gives us potentially the most complete example of the general process by which a wide class of important endeavors transition from failed reality to successful fakery.
That's skirting the "model" concept again, but:
While most modern sports enthusiasts are aware of wrestling's status as a pseudo sport, what few alive today remember is that it evolved out of a failed real sport (known as "catch" wrestling) which held its last honest title match early in the 20th century. Typical matches could last hours with no satisfying action, or end suddenly with crippling injuries to a promising athlete in whom much had been invested.
The idea was to avoid two "paradoxical risks":
Occasional but Extreme Peril for the participants
General: Monotony for both audience and participants
Think about that in the context of war — extensive boredom punctuated by episodes of extreme risk? Try these descriptions from WWI:
Since then we have been doing infantry work in the trenches. We have been out of work on our trenches; only shrapnel and snipers. Some one described this war as "Months of boredom punctuated by moments of terror." It is sad that it is such a bad country for cavalry.
"Months of boredom punctuated by moments of terror" : such is a description of life in the Navy which a naval lieutenant quotes as exactly fitting the facts.
That covers army and navy, both from Where does the phrase of "boredom punctuated by moments of terror" come from? — but what about the air? It's not from WWI, but anyway:
In Barry Lopez's essay "Flight" (published in About This Life and originally in Harper's October 1995) he quotes pilots describing flying as "hours of boredom punctuated by minutes of terror.
And what of love — after, as they say, the honeymoon is over?
For that matter, and at an entirely different scale, what about the heartbeat?
That's "boredome punctuated by excitement" in a nutshell, iterated, and becoming a (mostly) relable rhythm..
Iterated. Rhythm.
I'm unconvinced that the heartbeat is an example of "the general process by which a wide class of important endeavors transition from failed reality to successful fakery".. And that's a crucial element of the general process, eh? It has to do with the way in which "important endeavors transition from failed reality to successful fakery."
I'd read that as potentially covering the transition from failed Mueller to successful Fox, if things go that way. YMMV:
But "general process" — again, what's the mnodel? And more preciseluy, what would the model look like in "stocks and flows" system dynamic form, say in STELLA? See Donella Meadows, Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System?
Or HipBone?
I'm not convinced Mueller / Fox is a "boredom then excitement" example, much less that Mueller and Fox are allied in producing their result, whatever this may turn out to be — but Democrat and Republican, perhaps..
And my search for the abstraction, the underlying model of the general process proposed continues..
KAYFABE in Professional Wrestling tells us more:
To lift the veil on the world of professional wrestling, we need to take a look at the term 'kayfabe'. Kayfabe is a wrestling word coming from the early carnival days of wrestling for the word "keep", originally used as "keep quiet", or "keep secret". Kayfabe is often seen as the suspension of disbelief that is used to create the non-wrestling aspects of the business, such as feuds, angles and wrestling gimmicks (or in layman terms, a wrestler's on-screen persona from their personality down to their attire). In relative terms, a wrestler breaking kayfabe during a show would be likened to an actor breaking character on camera.
In the past, it was common for wrestlers to adhere to maintaining kayfabe in public, even when outside the ring and off-camera, in order to preserve the illusion that the competition in pro wrestling was not staged.
Kayfabe breaking as analogous to "an actor breaking character on camera"? And kayfabe transitioning from "virtual" to "real" — another of our favorite themes? Here we are again, from our first source:
Importantly, Kayfabe also seems to have discovered the limits of how much disbelief the human mind is capable of successfully suspending before fantasy and reality become fully conflated. Wrestling's system of lies has recently become so intricate that wrestlers have occasionally found themselves engaging in real life adultery following exactly behind the introduction of a fictitious adulterous plot twist in a Kayfabe back-story.
So "wrestlers have occasionally found themselves" — wrestlers, plural, found themselves engaging, plural — in adultery? Our model needs to accomodatee this plurality along with all the rest.
Adultery?
Posted in analogical, analogy, Charles Cameron, complex systems, complexity, donald trump, Evolution, love, magic, model, mueller, paradox, Patterns, simulation, sports, systems thinking, war | 1 Comment »