Платоновский сборник
Т. 1. М.; СПб.: РГГУ-РХГА, 2013.
Academic editor: А. В. Михайловский, А. А. Глухов, О. В. Алиева, И. А. Протопопова
Эленхос и небытие в диалоге «Софист»
Алиева О. В. В кн.: Платоновский сборник. Т. 1. М.; СПб.: РГГУ-РХГА, 2013. С. 332-348.
The description of the elenctic method in the Sophist (230a–e) is often believed to be merely retrospective. However, some parallels with Aristotle's Sophistical refutations suggest that the dialogue as a whole has a clear elenctic dimension. Having faced an apparent refutation (falsehood paradox), the interlocutors find themselves in an impasse. According to Aristotle, to solve such aporiai one must eliminate ambiguity and homonymy by making distinctions, i.e. recur to the diairesis. The same tactics is applied by the Stranger and Theaetetus.
Свободная речь в «Горгии» Платона
Глухов А. А. В кн.: Платоновский сборник. Т. 1. М.; СПб.: РГГУ-РХГА, 2013. Гл. 18. С. 405-435.
The paper offers an interpretation of Plato's dialogue Gorgias in the context of post- Nietzschean political thought (M. Heidegger, L. Strauss, H. Arendt, G. Deleuze, M. Foucault). Each interlocutor of the dialogue claims that his speech is free. Two different political logics are introduced: «geometrical» (as in the conversation between Socrates and Polus) and «erotic» (as in the conversation between Socrates and Kallikles). The philosopher is able to make use of both languages. In the end, it is only Socrates who truly speaks freely, because philosophy doesn't seek to be loyal to any of these two logics as it only aspires to solve a political collision between freedom and justice.
Русский текст Платона: современное состояние
Россиус А. А. В кн.: Платоновский сборник. Т. 1. М.; СПб.: РГГУ-РХГА, 2013. С. 104-116.
The surge of interest in philosophy in Russia throughout the first decades of the last century and the ensuing publishing activity showed great promise for the translations of philosophical classics as well: there was every reason to hope that the nearest future would see the Russian translations of the works of Plato achieve the same refreshing diversity as it came to be the fact with the English, German, French and, slightly later, the Italian and Spanish Plato. The break in this development brought about by the October revolution had a fatal effect on the prospects of the "Russian Plato": the very manner in which publishing process became organized under the new regime meant that the new strategy was to undertake a collective translation of every major author which was to remain for decades as a "standard" reference work. This is why we have the four familiar volumes of Plato's dialogues where the better and finer translations are printed alongside those that are total failure. Even the best and most successful translations among these, however, inevitably suffer from not relying on a long tradition of attempts to interpret and render in Russian the subtleties of Plato's thought. This paper demonstrates the latter point by submitting to examination the passage from Plato's Republic containing the simile of the Cave as translated by A.N. Egunov, one of the greatest connoisseurs of Greek to be born in Russia. The results are discouraging: it turns out that Egunov fails to convey some of the most important images and metaphors present in the simile. It is obvious that this situation can be overcome only by building a solid tradition by producing more different translations of the same key philosophical.
Research target: Philology and LinguisticsPhilosophy, Ethics, and Religious Studies
Priority areas: humanitarian
Full text (PDF, 2.87 Mb)
Keywords: PlatoPlatonism
Платоновский сборник: в 2 т.
Edited by: А. В. Михайловский, О. В. Алиева, А. А. Глухов и др. Т. 2. М.; СПб.: РГГУ-РХГА, 2013.
Hellas, Multiplied by Communism
Gloukhov A. Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2014
The rebirth of communism, as shown by a new wave of publications (A. Badiou, B. Groys, S.Žižek), disqualifies the historical peculiarity of the Soviet experience in favor of the eternal "idea of communism", originating in the works of the Ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. It is an ironic reversal of the fates suffered by the studies of Antiquity after the Russian Revolution. Apparently, the present day supra-historical idealism and the old school historical materialism exclude each other. On the other hand, an analysis of Soviet cultural politics from the 1920-30s may demonstrate that those radical theoretical stances were presented as distinct practical phases in the same changing experience of communism. A repudiation of the Soviet past brings for the current rebirth of communism nothing other than the hiding of ugly practical problems behind theoretical purity.
Символ Тарковского и Мамардашвили в контексте платонизма: непереводимость трансцендентного
Левина Т. В. Художественная культура. 2012. № 4.
This article is devoted to conceptual translation of the terms "transcendence" and, connected with the former, "symbol". Difficulties which appear in the translation of those concepts into the language of contemporary culture are due to the fact that the terms are descriptive, not explanatory. This indicates a special type of ontology, that refers to Plato. Symbol, which is at the same time transcendent and immanent, will be analyzed through the examples of Merab Mamardashvili's philosophy and Andrey Tarkovsky's films. Their understanding of symbol is linked to Pavel Florensky's philosophy of art and Pseudo-Dionysius's theology of symbol.
Protreptic in the Socratics: In Search of a Genre
Alieva O. In bk.: Socratica III. Academia Verlag, 2013. P. 128-139.
The scope of this paper is to enquire into the nature of the so called 'Socratic protreptic'. P. Harlich (1889) and K. Gaiser (1959) suggested that the 'Socratic protreptic' was a kind of transitional form from sophistic presentations to early Plato's dialogues. Diogenus Laertius only mentions the protreptics of Antisthenes (VP VI. 2) and Aristippus (VP II. 85), but there are two texts that came to be considered as protreptics as a result оf Gaiser's Protreptik und Paränese bei Platon: Xenophons' Memorabilia 4.2 and the Alcibiades of Aeschines. These texts, along with the spurious First Alcibiades, were included into the protreptic corpus by S.R. Slings (1999). We argue that Gaiser's approach is somewhat problematical, since the influence of Aeschines is not beyond any doubt. In the end, we focus on differences (both in structure and in content) between the 'Socratic protreptic' and those texts that were explicitly marked as protreptic in the IV century BC (Euthydemus, Clitiphon), which brings us to the problem of genre-definition.
Понятие ΑΙΩΝ в космологии Платона
Плешков А. А. Историко-философский ежегодник. 2014. С. 29-52.
According to the widely spread opinion among historians of philosophy, Plato makes a philosophical conceptualization of word αἰών, using it in the sense of "eternity" and implying infinity and timelessness. However, a careful analysis of Plato's cosmological ideas in the context of early usage of αἰών gives a basis for rejection of this traditional point of view. The paper presents an attempt to interpret the concept relying on the most reliable meaning of the word – "Life", extended to the sense of the fullness of being. Thus, our approach seems not only hermeneutically adequate, but gives a new perspective on the central questions of the Plato's cosmology.
Socratica III
Edited by: F. De Luise, A. Stavru. Academia Verlag, 2013.
This volume approaches the 'Socratic question' from a viewpoint that departs radically from mainstream lines of interpretation. The focus is not on the 'formal order' of the Socratics, that is on their subdivision in 'schools' and the 'doctrines' peculiar to each, but on the theoretical issues that these thinkers were able to develop in the fierce struggle among themselves. This collection features the revised versions of the papers presented at 'Socratica III - a conference on Socrates, the Socratics, and the ancient Socratic literature'. This conference is the latest of a series of Socratica symposia, previously held in Senigallia (2005) and Naples (2008), which were devoted to the developments of the research on the complex world serving as a context for Plato and his dialogues. This volume approaches the 'Socratic question' from a viewpoint that departs radically from mainstream lines of interpretation. The focus is not on the 'formal order' of the Socratics, that is on their subdivision in 'schools' and the 'doctrines' peculiar to each, but on the theoretical issues that these thinkers were able to develop in the fierce struggle among themselves. The papers dwell on the dynamic context in which these issues were posed, discussed, and eventually fixed in dogmatic theories within the philosophical and non-philosophical Greek literature of the V and IV centuries B.C. Following topics are examined: 1. the 'intellectual movement' around Socrates, i.e. Aristophanes and Comedy, Isocrates, Antisthenes, Chaerephon, Aeschines, Plato, and Xenophon; 2. the literary context in which the texts of the Socratics are framed; 3. major topics discussed within this movement, and their development within and outside the Socratic circle (apologetics, dialectics, politics, misology, eudaimonia, eusebeia, Eros, enthousiasmos, parrhesia, protreptics, spoudaiogeloion, epistemology and teleology); the reception of these issues in Late Antiquity, from Aristotle up to the Stoic, Neoplatonic and Arab traditions; 4. the state of the art of the 'Socratic question', and reviews of the major publications that appeared on Socrates and the Socratics between 2010 and 2011 (D. Morrison's Companion, L.-A. Dorion's and F. Bevilacqua's editions of the Memorabilia, and V. Gray's works on Xenophon and G. Danzig's book on the apologetic side of the earlier Socratic literature).
Политический смысл диалектики
Глухов А. А. Вестник Русской христианской гуманитарной академии. 2013. Т. 14. № 3. С. 19-27.
The paper deals with the political sense of the dialectical method of Plato. Dialectics is often understood as a pure logical procedure. However the two forms of the dialectical discourse (mentioned in the "Phaedrus") must be interpreted politically: the first one is a movement of freedom, the second one is a movement of justice. The paper offers a comparison of different conception of dialectics by Plato, Aristotle, Hegel, and Paul Ricoeur.
Развитие современного информационного пространства: анализ и перспективы
Дзялошинский И. М., Пильгун М. А., Тощева А. В. и др. Вып. 11. М.: АПК и ППРО, 2012.
Эффективные стратегии и тактики в современных коммуникационных процессах
Edited by: М. А. Пильгун Вып. 10. М.: АПК и ППРО, 2012.
Наблюдения над палеографией византийских надписей Северного Причерноморья
Виноградов А. Ю. Вестник древней истории. 2012. № 1. С. 182-195.
Этические проблемы организационной, профессиональной и межличностной коммуникации
История философии для экономистов
Сорвин К. В. учебное пособие. учебное пособие. ГУ ВШЭ, 2000
hbar-expansion of KP hierarchy: Recursive construction of solutions
Takebe T., Takasaki K. arxiv.org. math. Cornell University, 2009. No. 0912.4867.
Два отечественных введения в агиографию [Никулина Е. Н. Агиология. Курс лекций. М.: Изд-во ПСТГУ, 2008; Лурье В. М. Введение в критическую агиографию. СПб.: Аксиома, 2009] (рецензия)
Виноградов А. Ю. Богословские труды. 2012. № 43-44. С. 594-621.
Entries: "biconditional", "contingent", "sentence"
Schang F. Key Terms in Logic. ISBN-10: 1847061141. Bloomsberry Academic, 2010
A definition of three logical concepts: "biconditional", "contingent", and "sentence".
Рецензия на: Иванова К. Bibliotheca Hagiographica Balcano-Slavica. София: Академично издателство «Проф. Марин Дринов», 2008
Added: May 3, 2012
Социальный капитал и экономические представления российских и китайских студентов
Татарко А. Н. Психология образования в поликультурном пространстве. 2012. Т. 17. № 1. С. 47-55.
Культура русской диаспоры: эмиграция и мифы. Сборник статей
Таллинн: Таллинн, 2012.
Анисимов Е. В. СПб.: Питер, 2008.
In Search of the New "Turns": History and Theory in the 21 st century
Savelieva I. M. Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2011. No. 02.
This study researches some of the most recent theories (elaborated by historians and social scientists) applied to the practice of historical research. The object of this research includes ideas, concepts, notions, methods of scholarly analysis of past social reality, as well as the emergence of new interdisciplinary fields, mutual borrowings and interventions. In this connection, the opposite process — the historization of some very disparate disciplinary discourses — is briefly addressed. It includes especially historical aspects of anthropology and sociology in the coming century. The research is based on information from journals specialized in history and theory, on leading history journals which demonstrate the state of art in various research areas, on sociological journals publishing material on historical sociology and on monographs from 1995—2010.
Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), Valletta, Malta, 17-23 May 2010
Valletta: ELRA, 2010.
Персонифицированная легитимность.
Скиперских А. В. Свободная мысль. 2005. № 8. С. 119-203.
Виртуальные расширения человека: новые основы культуры и бизнеса
Экфрастический дискурс в романе Трейси Шевалье "Девушка с жемчужной сережкой
Тулякова И. И., Бочкарева Н. С. Мировая литература в контексте культуры. 2008. № 3(1). С. 150-154.