About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Instructions | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login
Backer CL
Kaushal S
Mavroudis C
HOW I DO IT?
Modified single-patch technique: Repairing complete atrioventricular septal defect
Carl Lewis Backer1, Sunjay Kaushal1, Constantine Mavroudis2
1 Division of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
2 Ross Professor of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, M41 - 02 Cleveland, OH, USA
Backer CL, Kaushal S, Mavroudis C. Modified single-patch technique: Repairing complete atrioventricular septal defect. Ann Pediatr Card 2009;2:51-4
Backer CL, Kaushal S, Mavroudis C. Modified single-patch technique: Repairing complete atrioventricular septal defect. Ann Pediatr Card [serial online] 2009 [cited 2021 Jan 20];2:51-4. Available from: https://www.annalspc.com/text.asp?2009/2/1/51/52808
The modified single-patch technique was conceived simultaneously by two separate groups, one in the United States and one in Australia. Dr. Benson Wilcox along with Dr. Robert Anderson, reported in 1997, a technique where 12 patients with complete atrioventricular (AV) septal defect had direct closure of the ventricular element. [1] This technique resulted in significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times. The intermediate term follow-up suggested that the results were comparable to those of a more standard two-patch technique. In 1999, Dr. Graham Nunn from Australia reported on 47 consecutive patients who were operated on between 1995 and 1998. [2] In all these patients, repair was performed by direct suturing of the common atrioventricular valve leaflet to the crest of the ventricular septum. Nunn concluded that this technique greatly simplified the repair and did not lead to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction or interfere with valve function.
The results reported by these institutions led us, over a period of six years, to evolve from our reliance on the classic two-patch technique to a modified single-patch technique during the years 2000-2006. [3] The name of this technique has evolved from the "simplified approach" to "simplified single-patch" technique to "modified single-patch" technique.
This operation is performed with cardiopulmonary bypass, moderate hypothermia (28°C), and aortic cross-clamp, with cold blood cardioplegia. After sternotomy and establishing cardiopulmonary bypass with bicaval venous cannulation, a vent is placed in the right superior pulmonary vein. The operation is facilitated by direct cannulation of the superior vena cava with a right-angle cannula. After administration of cold blood cardioplegia a medial right atriotomy is performed. This incision is very important and extends between the inferior vena cava cannula and the right coronary artery [Figure 1]. This allows the atrium to be opened very wide and gives maximum exposure of the common AV valve. The vent is withdrawn into the left atrium and the first part of the repair utilizes a bulb syringe to inject saline into the common AV valve [Figure 2]. By floating the common AV valve, the location of the projected midportion of the common AV valve where it will be separated into right and left components is established. We mark this "zone of apposition" point with a 6.0 or 7.0 prolene suture. This becomes the dividing point between the projected right and left AV valve. Next, a series of pledgeted sutures are placed on the right ventricular side of the crest of the ventricular septum [Figure 3]. These sutures are passed through the projected midpoint of the dividing line between the common AV valve leaflets. One of the reasons this operation is successful is because the superior and inferior bridging leaflets are not divided. After passing the suture through the AV valve tissue it is passed through a previously harvested autologous pericardial patch [Figure 3]. The sutures are tied and cut and this obliterates the ventricular component of the AV septal defect. The pledget in the myocardium and the pericardium buttress the apposition of the valve tissue to the ventricular septum. This helps prevent valve dehiscence during the postoperative period [Figure 4]. Next, the pericardial patch is reflected anteriorly and the zone of apposition of the left AV valve is approximated [Figure 5].
We used interrupted simple prolene sutures for this approximation. We continued placing sutures until the point where the chordae insert on the AV valve leaflet, both the superior and inferior bridging leaflets. Finally, the pericardial patch was used to close the atrial component of the AV septal defect [Figure 6]. The pericardial patch was sutured in place with running 5.0 or 6.0 polypropylene sutures. The location of the AV node is illustrated by the green dots in this series of illustrations. The AV node was avoided by placing the suture line very close to the inferior bridging leaflet and not bringing the suture line up to the atrial septum till it passed the coronary sinus. The right atrium was closed with two layers of running prolene sutures and the right and left sides of the heart were deaired in the usual fashion. The patients were usually weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass on 0.5 mcg/kg/minute of milrinone along with low-dose dopamine and/or dobutamine. We performed modified ultrafiltration on all patients for 10 minutes. The patients were evaluated by postoperative transesophageal echocardiography during the time of modified ultrafiltration.
We compared the results of the modified single-patch technique with the two-patch technique at our institution between 2000 and 2006. [3] There was no difference in postoperative mortality, with one death in the modified single-patch group (postoperative day 130, liver failure) versus no deaths in the two-patch group. Cross-clamp times and cardiopulmonary bypass times were shorter in the modified single-patch group (97.3 ± 19.9 versus 123.3 ± 28.2 minutes, P < 0.0003 : 128 ± 25 versus 157 ±37, P < 0.03). Rastelli classification was similar; type A was 18 versus 14, type B, 1 versus 0, and type C, 7 versus 15. The mean size of the ventricular septal defect as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography was 9 ± 2 mm in the single-patch group versus 10 ± 3 mm in the two-patch group. There was no difference in the median postoperative length of stay (10 versus 8 days). The AV valve insufficiency was evaluated as trivial, mild, moderate, and severe. There was no difference in the degree of postoperative left or right AV valve insufficiency as assessed by serial echocardiography [Figure 7a] and [Figure 7b]. There was one reoperation for left AV valve insufficiency in the modified single-patch group versus three in the two-patch group (4% versus 10%, P = ns). There were no patients with third degree AV block or requirement for reoperation for residual ventricular septal defect (VSD) in the modified single-patch group. There was one patient with third degree AV block, who required a pacemaker, and one patient that had a residual VSD in the two-patch group. No patient in either group required reoperation for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. From our comparison, the modified single-patch technique produced results comparable with the two-patch technique in younger patients with similar sized ventricular septal defects. The mean age at repair in the single-patch group was 4.4 ± 1.3 months. The mean weight was 4.74 ± 0.92 kg. The modified single-patch technique was performed with significantly shorter cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times.
I was recently asked to write an invited commentary on the superb results from the Michigan group, on patients with complete AV septal defects.[4] On analyzing those results and comparing them with the modified single-patch technique, ther were two aspects of the modified single-patch technique, on meta-analysis, which appeared to be an improvement on the classic two-patch technique. In a combined series of 200 patients undergoing the modified single- patch technique from the Children's Memorial group, Dr. Richard Jonas' experience [5] and Dr. Graham Nunn's [6] most recent publication showed that the incidence of left AV valve reoperation was only 2%. This compared with an incidence of left AV valve reoperation in the two-patch technique, which was 7% of 889 patients, and the classic one-patch technique, which was 9.7% of 350 patients.
It is my strong impression that the modified single-patch technique may be a technically superior surgical approach that will improve left AV valve function. By operating on younger patients (three to four months of age), by not dividing the AV valve leaflets, and by not placing a patch for the VSD we may be able to decrease the frequency of reoperations on the left AV valve.
One other outcome measure that has been raised as a concern for the modified single-patch technique is left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. If one looks at the data, the incidence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction requiring reoperation in the recent series from the University of Michigan (mostly two-patch technique) was 5% [4] Among a collected series of 200 patients undergoing the modified single-patch technique, some patients who were operated on by Dr. Nunn, now over 10-15 years (n = 26), there were no patients who required reoperation for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.[6] Although it may be counterintuitive, in actuality the synthetic patch placed in a two-patch technique may actually promote fibrosis that leads to obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract because of increased rigidity, turbulence of blood flow, and the presence of a foreign body in the left ventricular outflow tract.
An advantage of the modified single patch technique over the two-patch technique with regard to patch placement is the actual creation of the patch. For surgeons with less experience, the sizing and shape of the patch placed to close the ventricular septal defect can be difficult. This patch if too large will adversely affect the height of the AV valve and may lead to AV valve insufficiency. If the patch is too small it may not be sufficient, given that the strategy is to close the actual ventricular component. One of the reasons that we progressed to the modified single-patch technique is that we found our results seemed to improve as we made the VSD patch smaller. At a certain point it seemed logical to avoid the patch altogether.
We have not used this technique for patients with tetralogy of Fallot and atrioventricular septal defect, or patients with double outlet right ventricle with AV septal defect. In those patients the ventricular component is significantly larger and has required a patch to provide unobstructed flow from the left ventricle to the aorta. However, a slight modification of our technique for these patients has been to use the modified single-patch technique for the inferior bridging leaflet. The inferior bridging leaflet is attached directly to the crest of the ventricular septum as in the standard modified single-patch technique. A Gore-tex patch is then placed underneath the superior bridging leaflet to direct the left ventricular blood to the aorta, which is overriding in patients with tetralogy and originating solely from the right ventricle in patients with double outlet right ventricle.
In conclusion it is our strong belief that the modified single-patch technique is now the best technique available for the repair in patients with complete atrioventricular septal defect. This approach is associated with very low operative mortality, it is easily applied to small infants, and the incidence of reoperation for left AV valve insufficiency and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is significantly lower than previously reported, for either the classic single-patch technique or the two-patch technique.
1. Wilcox BR, Jones DR, Frantz EG, Brink LW, Henry GW, Mill MR, et al. Anatomically sound, simplified approach to repair of "complete" atrioventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:487-94. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]
2. Nicholson IA, Nunn GR, Sholler GF, Hawker RE, Cooper SG, Lau KC, et al. Simplified single patch technique for the repair of atrioventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:642-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]
3. Backer CL, Stewart RD, Bailliard F, Kelle AM, Webb CL, Mavroudis C. Complete atrioventricular canal: Comparison of modified single-patch technique with two-patch technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:2038-46. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]
4. Suzuki T, Bove EL, Devaney EJ, Ishizaka T, Goldberg CS, Hirsch JC, et al. Results of definitive repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect in neonates and infants. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:596-602. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]
5. Jonas RA. Complete atrioventricular canal. In: Jonas RA DiNardo J, Laussen PC, et al. (eds): Comprehensive Surgical Management of Congenital Heart Disease. London: Arnold Publishes; 2004. p. 397-8.
6. Nunn GR. Atrioventricular canal: Modified single patch technique. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2007:28-31. [PUBMED]
Carl Lewis Backer
Division of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children's Plaza, MC 22, Chicago, IL
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7a], [Figure 7b]
1 Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect: Comparison of Modified Single-Patch Technique with Two-Patch Technique in Infants
Gaofeng Pan,Laichun Song,Xuefeng Zhou,Jinping Zhao
Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2014; : n/a
2 Results of simplified single-patch repair for complete atrioventricular septal defect
Tagliari, A.P. and Schröder, D.A. and Filho, G.T. and Prates, P.R. and SantæAnna, J.R.M. and Nesralla, I.A. and Kalil, R.A.K.
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2013; 100(3): 288-293
3 Surgery for complete atrioventricular septal defect: Is a uniform strategy applicable
Talwar, S., Choudhary, S., Airan, B.
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology. 2009; 2(1): 58-60