Tag Archives: British Isles
Jun 15, 2011 · 6:37 pm
How Bernard Manning was almost cast in a classic British children's story…
Comedian and actor Matt Roper is going to the Edinburgh Fringe in August and should have a baptism of fire, as he is performing in two separate productions – as his comedy character Wlfredo in Wilfredo – Erecto! at the Underbelly and as a Satanic and sometimes singing spin doctor in the satire Lucifer: My Part in the New Labour Project (And How I Invented Coalition Government)at The Phoenix.
Matt is the son of George Roper, one of The Comedians in what was at the time the startlingly original and cutting-edge 1970s ITV series which introduced the British Isles to the 'old school' likes of Bernard Manning, Frank Carson, Stan Boardman and Jim Bowen.
I went with Matt to Soho last night to see London-based New York comic Lewis Schaffer's extraordinary on-going thrice-a-week Free Until Famous show. It was Matt's third visit. I go to see the show maybe once every month – as Lewis Schaffer says, it is "never the same show twice".
Matt, though every inch a 'new-school' comedian, grew up hanging round the old school comics as a kid.
Granada TV producer Johnnie Hamp was a seminal figure in British comedy of the time – he is also credited with putting The Beatles on TV for the first time. But I did not know until Matt told me last night that Johnnie had also put a young Woody Allen on British TV screens for the first time.
The most surprising story Matt had, though, was that his dad George Roper and Bernard Manning were originally considered for the parts of Tweedledum and Tweedledee in the mega-all-star 1972 movie version of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.
At the time of the casting read-through in London, George Roper was starring nightly on stage at the Palace Theatre, Manchester. On the day of the read-through, train hold-ups in the North West of England delayed him to such an extent that getting down to London and back up again in time for his appearance on stage in Manchester was going to prove impossible, so he had to cancel his trip.
The ever-exuberant and straight-talking Bernard Manning did make it down to the session, though, striding brashly into the room where Dame Flora Robson, Sir Ralph Richardson, Sir Robert Helpmann, Dennis Price, Peter Bull and other creme de la creme of up-market British theatrical nobility was holding court.
With an outspoken fucking this and a What the fucking hell is that? and a right old fucking load of old fucking bollocks, Bernard soon made his presence felt and…
as a result, neither Bernard Manning nor George Roper were cast in the film.
The parts of Tweedledum and Tweedledee went to the Cox Twins
I can't help feeling that Bernard Manning and George Roper would have been a casting made in movie comedy heaven.
More Matt stories Here.
Filed under Comedy, Movies, Television
Tagged as 1970s, actor, Adventures, Alice, American, Beatles, Bernard Manning, Britain, british, British Isles, children, coalition government, comedian, comic, Cox Twins, Dame Flora Robson, Dennis Price, edinburgh fringe, Erecto, film, Frank Carson, Free Until Famous, Granada, ITV, Jim Bowen, Johnny Hamp, lewis schaffer, london, Lucifer, Manchester, Matt Roper, movie, New Labour, new school, new york, old school, Palace Theatre, Peter Bull, Phoenix, producer, project, satire, Sir Ralph Richardson, Sir Robert Helpmann, Soho, spin doctor, Stan Boardman, stand up, television, The Comedians, TV, Tweedledee, Tweedledum, uk, Underbelly, United Kingdom, Wilfredo, Wonderland, woody allen
May 6, 2011 · 10:57 am
Why liars and the tsunami of history may yet lead to bloody civil war in Europe and Scottish independence
In 1985 I was on holiday in Uzbekistan.
Opposite our hotel, a new block was being built and its skeleton was showing massive cracks in the concrete. I asked an architect why this was.
"They are using the wrong type of concrete," he told me. "The decision on which type of concrete to use in the building was made centrally in Moscow. They have a very cold climate in Moscow. This is Uzbekistan. We are in the middle of a scorching hot desert. They are using the wrong type of concrete because those are the decisions made by the bureaucrats in Moscow."
The Soviet Union was partly an organisational disaster because it made centralised decisions for a nation which stretched from Uzbekistan and the Balkans in the west to Siberia and Mongolia in the east.
In 1991, Yugoslavia disintegrated, largely because, like the Soviet Union, it was a fake country with such disparate constituent parts that it never made a sensible whole. It just never held together as a single country because it was not a single country.
The UK joined the European Economic Community in 1973 and I remember the 1975 referendum in which English politicians Edward Heath, Harold Wilson and other pro-Europeans lied through their teeth and claimed we had joined an economic union which no-one had any intention of making a political union. The referendum was said to be about joining an economic Common Market.
The European Economic Community then became the European Union in 1993 and Eastern European countries joined after the fall of the Soviet Union. Turkey is likely to join, if it can get over its habit of routinely torturing people (or even if it doesn't). There is even talk of Uzbekistan joining – a 'partnership and co-operation agreement' came into force in 1999.
So we have the ludicrous spectre of a new Soviet-style Union with a centralised bureaucracy increasingly making decisions on the same basis for towns and cities from icy cold Aberdeen (I was partly brought up there in a council estate on a hill, so don't talk to me about cold) to the baking hot deserts of western Asia (I've been there).
And, give me a break, Scottish culture bears no relation to Balkan, Turkish or Uzbek culture, let alone Italian culture.
In Scotland yesterday, at the time of writing, the governing SNP (Scottish National Party) appears to have won a decisive victory in elections for the Scottish Parliament, possibly helped by the fact the opposition Labour Party seems to have mostly attacked not the SNP, but the Conservative Party which is virtually non-existent in Scotland. It would be as if Britain, at the start of World War Two, had decided to concentrate on waging war against Italy instead of Germany.
Presumably this own-goal disaster of a strategy was masterminded from London – another example of why centralised control is a bad idea.
Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond has said he will introduce a referendum on Scottish independence in the next Scottish Parliament.
I used to think Scottish independence was a ridiculous idea because Scotland is not economically large enough to be independent but I have changed my mind because of the European Union.
Clearly I do not think we should be in the European Union but there seems to be no practical way to get out of it.
If Scotland were to separate from the United Kingdom and become an independent country, then financially it would gain massively from being a small country within the European Union – I worked in Ireland in the 1990s and saw the massive financial benefits that country had reaped and was still reaping from Europe.
If Scotland became independent I do not know what would happen in Wales but there is some likelihood that it would move towards independence from England (for – whisper it quietly – it is in the United Kingdom not as a separate country but as a principality of England).
Instead of one country (the UK) being part of the EU, there would be three countries with three votes but the same outlook on almost all issues – an outlook shared by the island of Ireland (which is going to unify eventually, however it happens).
Quite what happens to Britain's 'voice within Europe' and to the British Armed Forces at this point, I can't even begin to get my head round. But we may yet live in interesting times as I cannot see a vastly enlarged European Union lasting very long without a Soviet style acrimonious break-up or a Yugoslavian type civil war.
Edward Heath, the lying cunt who took us into Europe may yet be the British leader who created a very bloody civil war within Europe.
We can't escape the tsunami of history.
Filed under History, Politics, Scotland, Travel
Tagged as Aberdeen, Alex Salmond, armed force, Asia, Balkans, break up, breakup of the union, Britain, British Isles, bureaucracy, centralisation, centralised, civil war, Common Market, Conservative, Eastern Europe, Edward Heath, EEC, election, empire, England, Europe, European Community, European Economic Community, First Minister, Germany, Harold Wilson, independence, Ireland, Iron Curtain, Italy, Labour, may you live in interesting times, Mongolia, Moscow, Parliament, party, politics, principality, referendum, Russia, Scotland, Scottish, Scottish Nationaist, Siberia, SNP, socialism, Soviet central, Soviet Union, tsunami of history, Turkey, uk, union, United Kingdom, Uzbekistan, voice within Europe, Wales, western, Yugoslavia
The god-like comedian Ken Dodd is more mugger than con man + he got a standing ovation in Bournemouth
Morecambe and Wise were not famous.
Yes, they were justifiably famous in the UK. But go to some village in western China and ask them who Morecambe and Wise were.
M&W are and always were total unknowns except in the British Isles.
Fame is relative and mostly regional.
To save my life, I could not tell you who the world water ski champion is. But presumably he or she is a Big Name if you follow water skiing.
The world is full of champions, each famous in their own little world.
I see quite a lot of club comedy and what is still called alternative comedy. Some of the acts are called comedy stars; some may even think they are stars. Audiences even flock to and fill large venues to see some of these people who have appeared in TV panel shows.
But they are not big stars even in the UK. They are minor and transient cults with a few disciples. Admittedly they have more disciples than Jesus did when he started but, just because you can get more than twelve people to listen to you in a room above a pub in Camden Town, don't start thinking you are more famous than the Son of God.
Unless you are known and regarded in awe by a random 50-year-old housewife in a bus queue in Leamington Spa, you are not famous in UK terms. If you can fill a big venue at the Edinburgh Fringe with 23 year old fans for 27 nights, you are not famous. You are a very minor cult.
Last night, I saw Ken Dodd's show Happiness at The Pavilion Theatre in Bournemouth. Ken Dodd is unquestionably famous in the UK and the venue was filled with a well-heeled middle-of-the-road, middle class Middle England audience of the type TV commissioners mystifyingly ignore. This audience was the great TV-viewing audience en masse on a rare trip out to see a live show.
Upcoming shows at The Pavilion include The Gazza and Greavsie Show, Roy Chubby Brown, Joe Pasquale, Jethro and Jim Davidson. Never, never, never underestimate the Daily Mail. Their readers are the mass audience. Admittedly Dylan Moran and Russell Kane also have upcoming shows at The Pavilion, but the phrases "sore thumbs" and "stand out" spring to mind.
London-based American comedian Lewis Schaffer has a routine in which he says his ex-manager told him he will never become famous unless, like a currently 'famous' alternative comedian, he can be a true professional and tell the same jokes in every show and repeat each show exactly.
Last night, the first half of Ken Dodd's 5-hour show proved the danger of being too experienced and too professional a performer if you are on a long tour.
There was an audibility problem.
This was partly because the sound system at The Pavilion was occasionally indistinct – certainly where I was sitting, centre right in the audience – and partly because Ken Dodd, after 55 years in showbiz and on his seemingly endless UK tour, has been doing the same routines and telling the same stories for too long. He came on stage and spoke what, for the first part of the show seemed to be a script which he had got so used to he didn't actually perform it: he just threw the words out. He galloped and gabbled through the words and syllables with the result perhaps a quarter of what he was saying was indecipherable.
And this was an audience with possible inbuilt hearing problems where I half expected the colostomy bags to break during the show to create a tsunami that could have washed the entire population of Bournemouth into the English Channel.
When an established act, instead of saying "Ladies and gentlemen" says "lay-ge-me" and all the other words and phrases are gabbled and elided indistinctly in much the same way, he is not performing an act, he is going through the motions on autopilot. He has heard the jokes 1,000 times; the audience has not (well, not most of them).
His saving grace was an astonishing gag rate of perhaps one potential laugh every ten seconds. And the material is gold. You couldn't go wrong with that material. But Doddy was getting laughs because the jokes (when heard) were good, not because of any technical skill in the delivery.
There are very few successful gag tellers in modern alternative comedy – Jimmy Carr, Milton Jones and Tim Vine are exceptions not the rule. Most successful alternative comedians nowadays tell stories: not necessarily funny stories, but stories told funny.
Ken Dodd mostly told gags in the first half and funny stories in the second half (in which he found his feet more). But it struck me that his slightly more old-fashioned (or let's say traditional) approach was very similar to inexperienced circuit comics today.
He told stories as if they were gags, with token links between each story, but with no over-all arc. If he told ten stories, the first and second might have a token link and the seventh and eighth might have a token link, but there was no over-all progression, no shape, no thread to the stories. So the over-all effect was like getting beaten round the head with gags by a mugger for five hours, not drawn into a personal fantasy world by a con man, which is what a stand-up comedian is.
It struck me Doddy's unlinked gag structure was very like comics new to the current comedy circuit who have some material but can't stitch it into a unitary act. They can do 10 or 15 or 20 minutes but are not yet capable of putting on a 60 minute Edinburgh Fringe show.
I suppose the transition from beating people into submission with barrages of gags rather than bringing them into your own personal world with smoothly-linked stories is a relatively recent development which Doddy has no need to embrace because he has so many gags and stories which he can throw at the audience from his years of experience.
Because he is so experienced and so good, I could not tell how much of the second half was scripted and how much he was just plucking and throwing in gags and stories from a mental storehouse.
One ad-lib which surely must have been planned and, indeed, 'planted' was a piece of banter with the audience in which Dodd asked a woman "How many children do you have?"
"Eight!" came the unexpected reply.
Dodd professed bewilderment at this and meandered for a couple of sentences about her husband, then asked:
"Have you sewn up the gap in his pyjamas yet?…. (pause)… You know what they say… A stitch in time saves…" (Immediate audience laughter – though strangely not as much as it deserved)
This cannot possibly have been an ad-lib. It had to have been planted in the audience because he feigned bewilderment at the initial reply of "Eight," which he would not have done in the way that he did if it were not a lead-up to the punchline.
There were also glimpses of an unexpected (to me) Ken Dodd – a ventriloquist act with a Diddy Man doll that almost verged on being post-modernist and a sequence in which he was doing a series of very passable regional accents and which went into a whole non-Ken-Dodd realm.
Small numbers of the audience left during the single interval – including the friend I went with, who had been exhausted by the first two and a half hours – she went paddling in the sea by the pier and then found a strange Greek Orthodox priest intoning his way through a Paschal Celebration in a small chapel watching by an old woman with a bell and an old man in a shabby grey suit. He had started at 10.00pm – about halfway through Doddy's show – and was still intoning, watched by his two fans, at 15 minutes past midnight after Doddy's show had ended and we went to see if he was still going strong.
Whether Christianity or Ken Dodd's shows will last longer is a moot point, but they probably have the same fans.
At the end of Ken Dodd's Happiness show, people rose from their seats to leave while still clapping and, partially blocked from leaving by other people possibly with mobility problems, this turned into a standing ovation and a sudden flutter of flashes as people with mobile phones snatched quick photos of the god-like Doddy on stage.
The standing ovation in both the stalls and the balcony was warm and heartfelt and passionate but perhaps was more for being a national institution than for the show itself.
It was an event as much as a show.
Much like Jesus preaching to the converted, in retrospect, it will be loved, treasured and much talked about and the Master's fame will spread, though perhaps neither further nor wider nor to western China.
Filed under Comedy, Religion, Theatre
Tagged as ad lib, alternative, audience, banter, Bournemouth, Britain, British Isles, Camden, champions, circuit, club, colostomy bags, comedy, comic, commissioners, commissioning, con man, conman, Daily Mail, Diddy, disciples, Doddy, Dylan Moran, edinburgh fringe, England, English Channel, fame, famous, fans, gags, Gazza, Greavsie, Greek Orthodox, happiness, humor, humour, Jesus, Jethro, Jim Davidson, Jimmy Carr, Jimmy Greaves, Joe Pasquale, Ken Dodd, Leamington Spa, lewis schaffer, london, middle class, middle England, Milton Jones, morecambe and wise, mugger, music hall, panel game, Paschal Celebration, Paul Gascoigne, Pavilion Theatre, routines, Roy Chubby Brown, Russell Kane, show, Son of God, stand up, standing ovation, stardom, story arc, story telling, success, television, Tim Vine, tour, tsunami, TV, UN, United Kingdom, vaudeville, ventriloquist, western China
Apr 23, 2011 · 11:13 am
Exclusive extract – "Killer Bitch – The Novel"
NB THIS BLOG POSTING CONTAINS POTENTIALLY OFFENSIVE SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL.
When the movie Killer Bitch was released last year, it was also going to be published simultaneously as a novel but, when the main supermarket chains and main bookshop chains refused to stock it, the publisher pulled publication of the unfinished book a week before the manuscript was due for delivery. The supermarkets and bookshop chains had not read any extracts from the book and apparently rejected it on the basis of the movie's pre-release notoriety. This is how the book started… My thanks to James Joyce…
Text is copyright 2010 John Fleming
CHAPTER ONE: THE NAKED GIRL WAS BOUNCING ON TOP OF THE NAKED MAN
The naked girl was bouncing on top of the naked man, riding his cock to orgasm. The man was a porn star. Hustler magazine had written that he was one of the 50 Most Influential People in Porn. The man was groaning; the girl was screaming; the film camera was quietly whirring; they were on a bed in a room in a warehouse in an industrial estate in Woking, near the M25 motorway that runs round London. The warehouse was used as a hardcore porn studio. There were about 20 sets standing in the empty warehouse: a supermarket, a dungeon, a garage with a yellow Reliant car from BBC TV's Only Fools and Horses, a Colonial office with a Union flag and a portrait of the Queen on the wall. But this was just a bedroom. There were two bedrooms with two beds in them. This was the red room with the pink bed.
As the man felt the sperm pulse and vibrate up his cock and the video camera watched by the left side of the bed, the naked girl riding him slipped her hand under the pink silk sheet and pulled out a curved jambiya dagger with a polished rhinoceros horn handle and a double-sided blade. The pitch of her screams changed. Higher, sharper, like the curved blade of the knife. High. Sharp. Then down in a curved stabbing movement. The man was confused as he saw a single silver flash of the curved blade before it plunged into his chest and tore into his flesh. His orgasmic groans turned into a single long high-pitched scream.
He felt the white semen pumping out of his cock. He saw the red blood spurt out of his chest, splashing up onto the bouncing perfectly-lit breasts of the naked, now banshee screaming, girl. He felt the sharp pain in his cock and the sharper pain in his chest and then the curved knife was rising again, its blade covered in his own dripping red blood.
"You fuc… aaaarrrgggghhhh!" he screamed as the blade went into him again, closer to his throat.
She stabbed him eleven times; he died on the fourth stab.
She could smell the stench of his insides when she slashed his chest open.
He was Number 3 on her list.
When she had finished, she collapsed on his bloodied, gashed body, gasping for breath.
"You done well," the cameraman told her.
Outside the bedroom window, rain was falling. It was falling on all of the British Isles. It was falling on all of England, on Scotland, on Wales, on the island of Ireland, on all the thousand or more islands huddled together in the water off the North West coast of Europe. Water fell out of the sky like a drunk God pissing on his own botched Creation. In Cumbria, in North West England, the rivers overflowed and a policeman was killed when the bridge he was standing on collapsed into the swollen river below. He had four children. So it goes.
Outside the Highland city of Aberdeen, in North East Scotland, on a windy, rainswept Friday night, a junkie called Bill Burrows was sitting in a closed slaughterhouse, waiting to meet his dealer, when two men he had never seen before burst in and one of them shot him without a word. The slaughterhouse already smelled of battery acid and iron because of all the spilled blood from the slaughtered animals and the smell did not change when he died. About two pints of blood came out of him, as it does when you shoot someone. A spit in the ocean in a slaughterhouse.
The two men dragged his half-dead body into a large freezer at the back of the slaughterhouse and left it there until his corpse became a solid block of dead meat. If you want to cut a body up, the thing to do is to freeze it solid; that way, there isn't so much of a mess when you cut it up – no blood spraying and squirting. It's much cleaner.
On Sunday night the two men came back and took his body out of the freezer when The X Factor talent show was on TV; they lay it on the floor and hit the solid, frozen joints with a sledgehammer to break it up at the shoulders, the elbows, the knees, the ankles; then they chopped the body up with an axe. They took the body parts to a huge pressure cooker in the slaughterhouse which could take 50 or 60 lbs of meat at a time and they cooked the dismembered body at very high temperature at very high pressure – 25 pounds per square inch. After an hour, the flesh, the bones and everything except the teeth had turned to gel. On Monday morning, they took the gel to a farm 30 minutes away and fed it to the pigs; there were 200 pigs; they ate everything by the end of the day; Bill Burrows' teeth were thrown into a nearby river.
Five days later, the police realised he was missing and the last place he'd been seen was near the slaughterhouse. They found a book lying on his bedside table at home: Slaughterhouse Five. The press went wild with the story for two weeks afterwards – they wrote about the Slaughterhouse Five killings. The story staggered on for two weeks but interest in a tabloid tale with no leads and no puns waned and was blown off the front pages by police inaction, political corruption and glamour model Katie Price's decision to go on the reality TV series I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here!
Bill Burrows had been Number 4 on the unknown killer's list. Cut up randomly.; soon forgotten.
On the outskirts of Penzance in Cornwall, an elderly man stumbled erratically along a muddy path in the rain, trying to run for his life. His killer strode relentlessly behind him. The elderly man stumbled into the out-building of a farm. A bemused horse in a field watched human life pass by in the rain. The elderly man tripped and fell, sodden and defeated, in a corner then slowly got up again. His killer strode in and stood opposite him. They looked in each other's eyes. The elderly man looked at his killer in disbelief. The killer looked at the elderly man with resignation. Neither spoke. The killer pulled the trigger six times. The elderly man was jerked backwards against the wall by the force of the bullets, then slumped down dead. His eyes flickered once; he heard his own last sigh. He was Number 2 on his killer's list.
Filed under Books, Crime, Movies, Sex
Tagged as Aberdeen, Alex Reid, BBC TV, bridge, Britain, British Isles, Cornwall, Cumbria, England, film studio, flood, Get Me Out of Here, hardcore, Highlands, Hustler, I'm a Celebrity, ITV, jambiya, Jordan, Katie Price, Killer Bitch, london, M25, novel, Only Fools and Horses, Penzance, policemen, porn, Reliant, Scotland, Slaughterhouse Five, uk, United Kingdom, Woking, X Factor
Mar 23, 2011 · 2:27 am
Advice on how to get a book published…
Someone asked me yesterday how to get a book published by a reputable publisher in the UK.
My answer was to get a ghost writer – me – and pay me £156,000 + 98% of the royalties plus all the chocolate I can eat.
Sadly my offer was turned down, so my edited advice was this…
The conventional wisdom is that, to get a publishing deal, you need to have a literary agent but, to get a literary agent, you need to have a publishing deal.
In fact, you don't.
It doesn't matter if it's fiction or non-fiction.
Fiction sells better than non-fiction, but it is even more difficult to get published. Almost bloody impossible, in fact.
Either way, the best thing to do is this…
You need to write a one or two page outline synopsis of what will be in the book – beginning to end – so the publisher knows what he/she is actually going to get.
And write perhaps a 20-page extract. This does not have to be the first 20 pages, but it might as well be. The reason for providing this extract is twofold. It shows the publisher that you can write. And it shows them the style your book will be written in – the same facts can be written a million different ways. An extract gives them a feel for the suggested book's style.
Plus you need to include a biography of yourself – maybe half a page.
You are a good prospect if you are young (ie under 30), attractive and already have some track record in some creative area. And it helps massively if you can speak fluently. Being dead is not a good selling point if you are trying to get a publishing deal unless you are Jane Austen or George Orwell.
I know someone who was a 'reader' for Penguin Books. He was given a translation of a Japanese novel which Penguin had been offered. After reading it with growing excitement, his report to Penguin said that it was the most brilliant novel he had ever read and they would be mad not to publish it.
They told him: "We are not going to publish it."
The author had, unwisely, just died and would be unable to do any publicity for the book.
Publishers want someone, preferably attractive and certainly alive, who can do publicity interviews for the book and who is ideally young enough to provide them with maybe 40 more years of books. They seldom want a one-off wonder unless you have an absolutely cracking story like being held as a sex slave for 14 years by Prince Philip in a secret cellar under Buckingham Palace or cutting off your own leg with a fish knife while being held hostage by Saddam Hussein in a Paris brothel.
When you have your idea, outline, biography and extract together, you should then go to a bookshop and see which publishers are selling the type of book you want to write and approach them one by one, having looked in a copy of the annual Writers' and Artists' Yearbook which gives contact names, addresses and publishing requirements.
One thing you do not do is this…
You do NOT write the book first and then approach a publisher.
You want to screw an Advance out of them.
That way, even if the thing sells no copies, you have earned something for your talent, time and heartache.
If you approach a publisher with a completed book you cannot, by definition, get any Advance from them to tide you over while you write the book. You would have worked for perhaps two years for no money and you may have written what publishers don't want.
Also, publishers like to feel they are controlling the creative process. Most publishers I have encountered are wannabe writers who cannot actually write creatively themselves, so they want to write and/or re-write through you while getting cultural kudos with their friends at dinner parties in Islington.
Never believe that publishers know anything about creative writing. If they did, they would be writing books themselves.
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, publish…
…and try to interfere with your writing to give themselves a creative hard-on.
The thing to remember is that, up to the point of signing the contract, they can cast you aside and they have all the power. But, after signing the contract, you have most of the power. Under a standard publishing contract, they control the cover, but they cannot change a single comma of the text without your permission and it is unlikely (unless your book is utter shit) that they will throw away the Advance they have paid you. So listen to their advice but stick to your creative guns if you disagree.
If (just to use round numbers) you get a £9,000 advance, you would normally be paid £3,000 on signing the contract. You then have to write the entire book with no more money coming in. You then get £3,000 on delivery of an acceptable final manuscript. And you then have to wait for 6-9 months and get £3,000 on publication. So any 'Advance' tends to mean you only get one third up-front in advance of writing the book.
The thing to remember is that it highly unlikely you will make any significant money from your book. Literally hundreds of books are spewing into existence every month to try to find space on the same limited shelves. It is like playing the Edinburgh Fringe. You are unlikely to get noticed and it is like standing in a cold shower tearing up £50 notes. In the case of writing a book, these are the £50 notes you could have earned by stacking shelves in a supermarket rather than starving in a small room earning no money while you toil away at your creative keyboard.
If your book is a paperback, you are likely to get a royalty of only 7.5% of the cover price. So, if your book sells for £10, you get 75p per copy sold. Roughly.
I believe most books sell well under 10,000 copies in the British Isles and fail to make a profit. Publishers live on their rare big buck-earners.
When approaching a publisher nowadays, you also have to take into consideration the new phenomenon of eBooks. Random House recently signed a big deal with Apple to put their back catalogue and future publications onto iBooks.
My 2002 contract with Random House for the anthology Sit-Down Comedy specified a 50% royalty on any future e-book version. A fortnight ago, they sent me a letter saying they want to only pay 25% instead of 50% on any eBook version because the contracted 50% royalty rate "was arrived at before the UK eBook market had begun to develop and before the extent of our digital investment was known. Since this royalty was agreed, the eBook market has moved on greatly but, in the process, we have found that 50% of net revenues is no longer viable".
Well, lovies, my tendency is to say, "Tough shit, life's a bitch and a gamble, ain't it? Don't come whining to me if you mis-calculated your own business."
But, with Sit-Down Comedy, in fact, it doesn't much matter because, although the contract was with the late Malcolm Hardee and me as editors of the book, we agreed to split the royalties between ourselves and the 19 contributors to the anthology. So we are talking miniscule sums even if it sold loads.
However, I know another author whose book has been in print for quite a few years. It may soon go out of print. Under a standard contract, if a book is out of print for two years, all rights return to the author. So, for example, Malcolm Hardee's autobiography I Stole Freddie Mercury's Birthday Cake was out of print for two years and now 100% of all rights have reverted to me and to the estate of the late Malcolm.
However, if this other chum of mine's book becomes an eBook, my understanding is that it will, in theory, never go out of print – the file will still be available for download from the Apple/Amazon/publisher's computer – and so the publisher will retain the rights until 70 years after the author's death.
If my chum, on the other hand, refuses to accept a royalty cut from 50% to 25%, then it will presumably not become an eBook, the paperback will go out of print and, two years later, 100% of all rights will revert to my chum. And there would then be the possibility of negotiating a new publishing deal or publishing via some print-on-demand operation like lulu.com
We live in interesting times and that, of course, is the ancient Chinese curse.
Filed under Books, PR
Tagged as advance, advice, Apple, biography, book, Britain, British Isles, brothel, Buckingham Palace, Chinese curse. may you live in interesting times, contract, culture, deal, ebooks, edinburgh fringe, editor, extract, fiction, George Orwell, hardback, how to get a book published, I Stole Freddie Mercury's Birthday Cake, ibooks, iPad, Islington, Jane Austen, kudos, literary agent, non-fiction, out of print, outline, paperback, Paris, Penguin Books, PR, Prince Philip, print on demand, publicity, publisher, publishing, Random House, royalties, Saddam Hussein, sex slave, Sit-Down Comedy, synopsis, those who can do, uk, United Kingdom, wannabe, writer, Writers and Artists Yearbook
Feb 1, 2011 · 11:25 am
Britain is full of immigrants
Allegedly, the USA is the 'Land of Opportunity' where any immigrant can arrive with nothing and create a new life for himself or herself with unlimited potential. But you cannot become President if you were not born in the USA.
What's that all about?
I have a British friend whose parents were Indian – they arrived and settled here in the UK in the 1950s and 1960s. She told me (and I admit I was surprised) that she had never experienced any racial discrimination in the UK. She never encountered it until she lived in the USA.
It does seem to me – in a vast generalisation – that the US is a land of separated peoples. They define themselves as Irish-American or Swedish-American or African-American and they tend to retain their original nationalities in social clubs and by living together in areas, sometimes ghettos.
In Britain, after a couple of generations, people define themselves as British.
People talk about Britain having a 2,000 year history – since the Romans invaded. But that's bollocks. The Romans didn't even control the whole of Great Britain – the main island of the British Isles. They invaded and controlled what is now England, the lower part of Great Britain; for a very brief time they controlled parts of what is now Lowland Scotland (Hadrian's Wall is south of the current border); they never fully managed to control Wales; and, as many have, they pretty-much gave up at the very thought of controlling Ireland.
Last century, actor Gordon Jackson was the definitive Scotsman. He played the butler Hudson in the original ITV series of Upstairs, Downstairs and, whenever movie-makers wanted a Scotsman in their film, he was their first call. He epitomised Scottishness.
Occasionally I used to work with one of his sons. When he (the son) reached his 40th birthday, he told me that, the older he got, the more Scottish he felt.
"Where were you born?" I asked.
"Hampstead."
Hampstead is in North London. But then, if you are the son of Gordon Jackson, you are going to feel Scottish. His mother was Scots too and, though brought up in London, they had a holiday home in Pitlochry.
I remember standing in an office in the London Weekend TV tower looking out at a misty, drizzly South Bank and Westminster scene and saying to this Son of Gordon Jackson:
"Now that is dreich."
"Definitively dreich," he replied.
Dreich is a Scots Gaelic word which is virtually impossible to define in English. You have to see what it describes if you want to understand it.
There is an interesting theory that the Welsh – or, at least, the people in the middle of Wales, the mountainous parts, the parts that ironically get at bit uppity about being called British and insist on keeping the Welsh language afloat – are actually the only remnants of the original British, pushed back into that western bump of Great Britain by successive invaders from the south, east and north of the island.
The original British were killed-off or bred out of existence perhaps 1,500 years ago.
Basically, everyone in Britain is an immigrant except, possibly, the forefathers of a few Welsh people.
In the legend of the Knights of the Round Table, the point is often forgotten that King Arthur was killed. The invaders, in reality, won. The losers possibly fled West.
My surname is Fleming so, at some point, my forebears came from Flanders/Belgium/Holland. But, despite an uncalled-for English accent, I am Scottish. The Scots and Irish are allegedly Celtic but, to my eyes, are clearly Scandinavian – pale skin, light hair, sometimes freckles. I used to have dark brown hair and a ginger beard. That's Scandinavian.
The Welsh are said, like the Scots and Irish, to be Celtic; but the Welsh are in generalised physical terms nothing like the Scots and Irish – they tend to have dark hair, for one thing.
The Celts, again in very general terms, came from Central Europe. So they are sort-of German though, when I worked in the Czech Republic, the locals reckoned the Celts had actually come from what is now the Czech area of Central Europe.
The Anglo-Saxon English are from what is now Germany – the result of invasions by the Angles and the Saxons.
A Danish TV director I know, who worked with both me and Son of Gordon Jackson, told me he once drove round Yorkshire and recognised most of the names of the towns and villages: they were either recognisable Danish names or bastardisations of Danish names.
Hardly surprising, given that Denmark ruled most of England for so long.
To be a racist, you need to be ignorant of history. To talk of "racial purity" anywhere requires a deep ignorance of history. To talk of "racial purity" in the UK requires a remarkable level of crass stupidity.
I am old enough to remember TV documentaries about the last Yiddish language newspaper closing in the East End of London. Some of the street signs there – around Brick Lane – used to be in Yiddish; now they are in Bengali. Limehouse in East London used to be a Chinese area. Now there's a little Chinese area in Soho (artificially created, it has to be said, by 'Red Ken' Livingstone). Everything is constantly changing.
The English language has thrived on constant new inputs from foreign languages; it is constantly changing. The 'British people' (whatever that means) have thrived on constant new cultural inputs and there is constant, vibrant change. Britain is constantly being re-born. Unlike the USA, we seem to have integrated and assimilated our immigrants over time. Admittedly we have had longer.
Britain, depending on how you define it, didn't even exist until 1603 (when James VI of Scotland became James I of England) or 1707 (when the Act of Union was signed). The flag which the British Army flew at the Battle of Culloden in 1746 in support of their Hanoverian monarch was not the current Union flag. The current so-called 'Union Jack' did not exist until 1801 when another Act of Parliament united the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland.
If/when either Northern Ireland or Scotland breaks from the United Kingdom and becomes independent, then the flag will have to change again.
No-one in Britain is, when it comes down to it, actually British. We are all immigrants. The British are long-dead, except perhaps for a few distant relatives in Machynlleth.
What "Britain" means is a moveable feast.
Filed under History, Racism
Tagged as 1603, 1707, 1801, Act of Parliament, Act of Union, African-American, America, Angle, Anglo Saxon, Battle of Culloden, Belgium, Bengali, Bohemia, border, Brick Lane, Britain, British Army, British Isles, Celt, Celtic, central Europe, Chinese, Czech, danegeld, Danish, Denmark, dreich, East End, England, ethic, ethnicity, Flanders, Fleming, Gaelic, ginger, Gordon Jackson, Great Britain, Hadrian's Wall, Hampstead, Hanover, Hanoverian, Holland, Hudson, immigrants, Immigration, Indian, Ireland, Irish-American, ITV, James I, James VI, Ken Livingstone, King Arthur, Kingdon of Ireland, knights, land of opportunity, language, Limehouse, London Weekend, lowland, Machynlleth, North London, Northern Ireland, Pitlochry, president, racial discrimination, racial purity, racism, racist, Red Ken, republic, Roman Britain, round table, Saxon, Scandinavia, Scotland, Soho, South Bank, Swedish-American, television, TV, uk, Ulster, Union flag, union jack, United Kingdom, Upstairs Downstairs, US, USA, Wales, Welsh, Westminster, Yiddish, Yorkshire