Free Self Help Legal Information for Missouri Residents
Free Legal Help
Library of Legal Articles
Brief History of US Law
Buying a Used Car – Tips and Things to Consider
Civil Cases vs. Criminal Cases
How to Buy Auto Insurance
Shopping for Funeral Services
The Federal Funeral Rule
Funeral Costs and Pricing Checklist
Funeral Terms and Contact Information
How Lincoln's embrace of embalming birthed the American funeral industry
UNDERSTANDING WARRANTIES
Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics
Chapter 11 – Bankruptcy Basics
Credit Repair: Self Help May Be Best
Going to Jail for the First Time
Grandparents Rights – Custody and Visitation
Gun Law in Missouri
Having a Productive Meeting With Your Lawyer
Firing Your Lawyer
How Much to Tell Your Lawyer
How can I stop a payday lender from electronically taking money out of my bank or credit union account?
Jury Nullification: The Top Secret Constitutional Right
What a Grand Jury Does
Appearing Before a Grand Jury
Missouri Hancock Amendment
Missouri Property Tax Credit – Seniors & Disabled
Searches Based on Consent
Dealing With Search Warrants
The Miranda Rights
Don't Talk to the Police
How Officers Trick People Into Giving Up their Miranda Rights
How to Invoke the Miranda Rights
The Rights of Minors to Remain Silent and to See a Lawyer
What to Watch Out For, When You Remain Silent and Ask to See a Lawyer
When the Miranda Rights Must be Read to a Suspect
The progress of a civil lawsuit
What if police say they smell marijuana?
When can police search your car?
Top 4 Traffic Ticket Myths
What are my rights at various "checkpoints"?
What are the "rules of evidence"?
Necessity Defense
What is "clear and convincing evidence"?
What is an "affirmative defense"?
How are jurisdiction and venue used as affirmative defenses?
What is the Erie Doctrine?
What does it mean when a law is "void for vagueness" or "overbroad"?
What is probable cause?
What To Do When Car Rental Reservations Aren't Honored
Dictionary of Legal Terms
ACLU of Missouri Mobile App
Why I Created this Site
Free Self-Help Legal Information
Why White Cops Kill Black Men
St. Louis City's Culture of Corruption
Black St. Louis Ex-Cop Tells the Truth About Race and Policing
Housing Violations
Warning about new St. Louis City Parking Meters
St. Louis' Racial Oppression
Uplands Park, MO
Reporting Misconduct by Judges
Corrupt Judges
Municipal Court News
2017 News Items
June 2017 News
September 2017 News Items
May 2016 News Items
March 2016 News Items
April 2016 News Items
Representing yourself in court
Legal Research for Non-Lawyers
Public Defender – Pros and Cons
Working With a Public Defender
Understanding Missouri Courts
Bail – Release from Custody
Bogus Legal Theory of Sovereign Citizen
Expungement in Missouri
Federal protections against rights violations
Free Self-Study Business Law Course
Chapter 1 – Introduction to Law and Legal Systems
Chapter 2 – Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Chapter 3 – Courts and the Legal Process
Chapter 4 – Constitutional Law and US Commerce
Chapter 5 – Administrative Law
Chapter 6 – Criminal Law
Chapter 7 – Introduction to Tort Law
Chapter 8 – Introduction to Contract Law
Chapter 9 – The Agreement
Chapter 10 – Real Assent
Chapter 11 – Consideration
Chapter 12 – Legality
Chapter 13 – Form and Meaning
Chapter 14 – Third-Party Rights
Chapter 15 – Discharge of Obligations
Chapter 16 – Remedies
Chapter 17 – Introduction to Sales and Leases
Chapter 18 – Title and Risk of Loss
Chapter 19 – Performance and Remedies
Chapter 20 – Products Liability
Chapter 21 – Bailments and the Storage, Shipment, and Leasing of Goods
Chapter 22 – Nature and Form of Commercial Paper
Chapter 23 – Negotiation of Commercial Paper
Chapter 24 – Holder in Due Course and Defenses
Chapter 25 – Liability and Discharge
Chapter 26 – Legal Aspects of Banking
Chapter 27 – Consumer Credit Transactions
Chapter 28 – Secured Transactions and Suretyship
Chapter 29 – Mortgages and Nonconsensual Liens
Chapter 30 – Bankruptcy
Chapter 31 – Introduction to Property: Personal Property and Fixtures
Chapter 32 – Intellectual Property
Chapter 33 – The Nature and Regulation of Real Estate and the Environment
Chapter 34 – The Transfer of Real Estate by Sale
Chapter 35 – Landlord and Tenant Law
Chapter 36 – Estate Planning: Wills, Estates, and Trusts
Chapter 37 – Insurance
Chapter 38 – Relationships between Principal and Agent
Chapter 39 – Liability of Principal and Agent; Termination of Agency
Chapter 40 – Partnerships: General Characteristics and Formation
Chapter 41 – Partnership Operation and Termination
Chapter 42 – Hybrid Business Forms
Chapter 43 – Corporation: General Characteristics and Formation
Chapter 44 – Legal Aspects of Corporate Finance
Chapter 45 – Corporate Powers and Management
Chapter 46 – Securities Regulation
Chapter 47 – Corporate Expansion, State and Federal Regulation of Foreign Corporations, and Corporate Dissolution
Chapter 48 – Antitrust Law
Chapter 49 – Unfair Trade Practices and the Federal Trade Commission
Chapter 50 – Employment Law
Chapter 51 – Labor-Management Relations
Chapter 52 – International Law
Chapter 53 – Contracts
Protester Rights
Protest Songs Inspired by Police Killings
St. Louis Protest Organizations
Introduction to Criminal Law
Chapter 1 – Introduction to Criminal Law
Chapter 2 – The Legal System in the United States
Chapter 3 – Constitutional Protections
Chapter 4 – The Elements of a Crime
Chapter 5 – Criminal Defenses, Part 1
Chapter 7 – Parties to Crime
Chapter 8 – Inchoate Offenses
Chapter 9 – Criminal Homicide
Chapter 10 – Sex Offenses and Crimes Involving Force, Fear, and Physical Restraint
Chapter 11 – Crimes against Property
Chapter 12 – Crimes against the Public
Chapter 13 – Crimes against the Government
Chapter 14 -Appendix A: Case Listings
Plea Bargains
2017 Black History Month Posts
Educational Oppression
Black Founding Fathers
THE COLORED PATRIOTS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
Free Money for College
What Are My Rights in a College Dorm?
Up From Slavery
The Miseducation of The Negro
The Trial – by Franz Kafka
Medical Oppression
GENOCIDE BY DIET
Racial Bias in Mass Media
The Secret Meeting that Changed Rap Music and Destroyed a Generation
"KU KLUX KLAN: The Invisible Empire"
US Government Discrimination
Ballot or the Bullet
Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission
None Dare Call It Conspiracy
Billionaire Overthrow of US Government
Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom;
The Souls of Black Folk
"A NEGRO NATION WITHIN A NATION"
African History and Black Empires Your Were Never Told About
Racism – A History
Race Riots
Red Summer of 1919
Truth of How Slavery Started The Black Slave Trade and Racism
Goodbye Uncle Tom
Henry Garnet's Call to Rebellion
Narrative of William W. Brown, A Fugitive Slave
Slavery Isn't Over They Just Changed What They Called It
Walker's Appeal
The Willie Lynch Letter: The Making Of A Slave!
Why I Prefer Jury Trials
How does a jury work?
Importance of Jury Duty
What does it mean when a jury is "sequestered"?
Advertising on Court.rchp.com
Contact responses
Why you should share this website with others
Politics, Poverty
How racism has shaped welfare policy in America since 1935
August 22, 2016 MuniCourts
A Halloween gathering in Los Angeles for children who live on the street, in shelters or in cars. Lucy Nicholson/Reuters
By Alma Carten
A recent UNICEF report found that the U.S. ranked 34th on the list of 35 developed countries surveyed on the well-being of children. According to the Pew Institute, children under the age of 18 are the most impoverished age population of Americans, and African-American children are almost four times as likely as white children to be in poverty.
These findings are alarming, not least because they come on the 20th anniversary of President Clinton's promise to "end welfare as we know it" with his signing into law, on Aug. 23, 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (P.L. 104-193).
It is true that the data show the number of families receiving cash assistance fell from 12.3 million in 1996 to current levels of 4.1 million as reported by The New York Times. But it is also true that child poverty rates for black children remain stubbornly high in the U.S.
My research indicates that this didn't happen by chance. In a recent book, I examine social welfare policy developments in the U.S. over a 50-year period from the New Deal to the 1996 reforms. Findings reveal that U.S. welfare policies have, from their very inception, been discriminatory.
Blemished by a history of discrimination
It was the 1935 Social Security Act, introduced by the Franklin Roosevelt administration, that first committed the U.S. to the safety net philosophy.
From the beginning, the policy had two tiers that intended to protect families from loss of income.
On one level were the contributory social insurance programs that provided income support to the surviving dependents of workers in the event of their death or incapacitation and Social Security for retired older Americans.
The second tier was made up of means-tested public assistance programs that included what was originally called the "Aid to Dependent Children" program and was subsequently renamed the Aid to Families with Dependent Children in the 1962 Public Welfare Amendments to the SSA under the Kennedy administration.
The optimistic vision of the architects of the ADC program was that it would die "a natural death" with the rising quality of life in the country as a whole, resulting in more families becoming eligible for the work-related social insurance programs.
But this scenario was problematic for black Americans because of pervasive racial discrimination in employment in the decades of the 1930s and 1940s. During these decades, blacks typically worked in menial jobs. Not tied to the formal workforce, they were paid in cash and "off the books," making them ineligible for social insurance programs that called for contributions through payroll taxes from both employers and employees.
Nor did blacks fare much better under ADC during these years.
The ADC was an extension of the state-operated mothers' pension programs, where white widows were the primary beneficiaries. The criteria for eligibility and need were state-determined, so blacks continued to be barred from full participation because the country operated under the "separate but equal" doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court in 1896.
Jim Crow Laws and the separate but equal doctrine resulted in the creation of a two-track service delivery system in both law and custom, one for whites and one for blacks that were anything but equal.
A 'colored' drinking fountain – segregation applied to welfare benefits too. Russell Lee/Library of Congress
Developments in the 1950s and '60's further disadvantaged black families.
This happened when states stepped up efforts to reduce ADC enrollment and costs. As I examined in my book, residency requirements were proposed so as to bar blacks migrating from the South to qualify for the program. New York City's "man in the house rule" required welfare workers to make unannounced visits to determine if fathers were living in the home – if evidence of a male presence was found, cases were closed and welfare checks discontinued.
Always an unpopular program
Because of the strong American work ethic, and preference for a "hand up" versus a "hand-out," the means-tested, cash assistance programs for poor families – and especially ADC renamed AFDC – have never been popular among Americans. As FDR himself said in his 1935 State of the Union address to Congress, "the government must and shall quit this business of relief."
As the quality of life did indeed improve for whites, the number of white widows and their children on the AFDC rolls declined. At the same time, the easing of racial discrimination widened eligibility to more blacks, increasing the number of never-married women of color and their children who were born out of wedlock.
One point, however, to note here is that there has always been a public misconception about race and welfare. It is true that over the years blacks became disproportionately represented. But given that whites constitute a majority of the population, numerically they have always been the largest users of the AFDC program.
Holes in the safety net
The retreat from the safety net philosophy can be dated to the presidencies of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.
On the one hand, politicians wanted to reduce the cost of welfare. Under Reagan policies of New Federalism, social welfare expenditures were capped and responsibility for programs for poor families given back to states.
On the other hand, the demographic shift in the welfare rolls exacerbated the politics around welfare and racialized the debate.
Ronald Reagan's "Welfare Queen" narrative only reinforced existing white stereotypes about blacks. The term "welfare queen", a derogatory term used in the U.S. to refer to women who allegedly misuse or collect excessive welfare payments through fraud, child endangerment, or manipulation; originates from media reporting in 1974.
Since then, the phrase "welfare queen" has remained a stigmatizing label and is most often directed toward black, single mothers.
"There's a woman in Chicago. She has 80 names, 30 addressees, 12 Social Security cards and is collecting veterans' benefits on four nonexistent deceased husbands. She's got Medicaid, is getting food stamps and welfare under each of her names. Her tax-free cash income alone is over $150,000."
Reagan's assertions that the homeless were living on the streets by choice played to conventional wisdom about the causes of poverty, blamed poor people for their own misfortune and helped disparage government programs to help the poor.
The 1990s gear change
By the late 1990s efforts of reforms targeting the AFDC program shifted to more nuanced forms of racism with claims that the program encouraged out-of-wedlock births, irresponsible fatherhood and intergenerational dependency.
The political context for the 1996 reforms, then, was fueled by racist undertones that played into public angst about rising taxes and the national debt that were attributed to the high payout of welfare checks to people who were not carrying their own weight.
This emotionally charged environment distorted the poverty debate, and paved the way for a reform bill that many saw as excessively punitive in its harsh treatment of poor families.
Although credited to the Clinton administration, the blueprint for the 1996 welfare reform bill was crafted by a caucus of conservative Republicans led by Newt Gingrich as part of the Contract with America during the 1994 congressional election campaign.
Twice President Clinton vetoed the welfare reform bill sent to him by the GOP-dominated Congress. The third time he signed, creating much controversy, including the resignation of his own adviser on welfare reform, the leading scholar on poverty David Ellwood.
The new bill replaced the AFDC program with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). Stricter work requirements required single mothers to find work within two years of receiving benefits. A five-year lifetime limit was imposed for receiving benefits. To reinforce traditional family values, a core principle of the Republican Party, teenage mothers were to be prohibited benefits, and fathers who were delinquent in child support payments were threatened with imprisonment. States were banned from using federally funded TANF for certain groups of immigrants and restrictions were placed on their eligibility to Medicaid, food stamps and Supplementary Social Security Income (SSI).
Despite many bleak predictions, favorable outcomes were reported on the 10th anniversary of the bill's signing. Welfare rolls had declined. Mothers had moved from welfare to work and children had benefited psychologically from having an employed parent.
However, the volume of research generated at the 10-year benchmark has not been matched, in my observation, by that produced in years leading up to the 20-year anniversary.
More research in particular is needed to understand what is happening with families who have left welfare rolls because of passing the five-year lifetime limit for receiving benefits but have not sustained a foothold in an ever-increasing specialized workforce.
Disentangling intertwined effects of racism and poverty
U.S. welfare policy is, arguably, as much a reflection of its economic policies as it is of the nation's troublesome history of racism.
In the words of President Obama, racism is a part of America's DNA and history.
Similarly, the notion that anyone who is willing to work hard can be rich is just as much a part of that DNA. Both have played an equal role in constraining adequate policy development for poor families and have been especially harmful to poor black families.
Racism has left an indelible mark on American institutions. In particular, it influences how we understand the causes of poverty and how we develop solutions for ending it.
Indeed, with the continual unraveling of the safety net, the 20th anniversary of welfare reforms can be an impetus for taking a closer look at how racism has shaped welfare policy in the U.S. and to what extent it accounts for the persistently high poverty rates for black children.
Republished with permission under license by The Conversation
Alma Carten is an Associate Professor of Social Work; McSilver Faculty Fellow, New York University
Dr. Alma J. Carten earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from Ohio University, her Master of Social Work degree from the Whitney M. Young Jr. School of Social Work, and her Doctorate in Social Welfare from Hunter College School of Social Work of the City University of New York. At NYU, Dr. Carten is former chair of the social welfare programs and policies area, and teaches in the social welfare policies and human behavior curricula sequences in the MSW program and social policy analysis in the doctoral program. Dr. Carten is also a consultant reviewer for the US Department of Juvenile Justice, Children's Bureau of the Administration for Children and Families, helping to shape the national standards for child welfare outcomes. She has held a number of faculty appointments, including director and chair of the Westchester Social Work Education Consortium, and has taught at Hunter College School of Social Work and and the Behavioral Science Department at the New York City Policy Academy. Additionally, she was a member of the Administration for Children's Services Commissioner's Task Force on Minority Agencies. She served as president of the New York City Chapter of the National Association for Social Workers from 2000-2002.
Dr. Carten has professional experience in the private and public sectors. She served on the United Way of New York City agency membership Review Panel, and is a board member and consultant for a number of New York City voluntary social welfare agencies, the Administration for Children and Families, and the Children's Bureau at the federal level. Her work in government includes director of the Office of Adolescent Services for the New York City Human Resources Administration with responsibility for policy development and the design and implementation of citywide services for pregnant and parenting teens, interim commissioner of the Child Welfare Administration, special advisor to the HRA commissioner/administrator during the Dinkins administration, and appointed member of the Mayor's Commission on the Foster Care of Children. She has conducted research and published on family preservation programs, maternal substance abuse, child survivors of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, independent living services for adolescents, dimensions of abuse and neglect among Caribbean families, and neighborhood-based services and mental health services and the African American community.
Dr. Carten's professional interests focus on child welfare, and the delivery of culturally competent services to children and families. She has conducted extensive research studying the Caribbean and African immigrant communities in the New York metropolitan area.
She co-edited with Dr. James R. Dumpson, entitled Removing Risk from Children: Shifting the Paradigm, and a chapter titled "Family Preservation, Neighborhood Based Services," in Child Welfare Services: An Africentric Perspective, Everett & Leashore, co-editors. Her most recent publication "Reflections on the American Social Welfare State: The Collected Papers of James R. Dumpson," is published by NASW Press, and she is primary editor of "Anti-Racist Strategies for Transforming Health and Human Service" in press with Oxford University Press.
Previous PostDOJ report on Baltimore echoes centuries-old limits on African-American freedom in the Charm CityNext PostBayer and Monsanto: A Marriage Made in Hell
Put the power of the law in your hands
Things to do when a retailer won't exchange defective merchandise
Martin Luther King Jr. had a much more radical message than a dream of racial brotherhood
Federal financial aid for college will be easier to apply for – and a bit more generous
Racial discrimination ages Black Americans faster, according to a 25-year-long study of families
School suspensions don't just unfairly penalize Black students – they lead to lower grades and 'Black flight'
Progressive prosecutors scored big wins in 2020 elections, boosting a nationwide trend
Copyright ©2014-2017, RC Hill Publishing