http://appserver-a4b2c260-nginx-3cce674db6b4435398bddf172d355c5a/content/congress-must-shut-backdoor-section-702-surveillance
Congress Must Shut the Backdoor on Section 702 Surveillance
The House will consider an amendment to protect digital privacy.
By Ashley Nicole Baker
The fight over NSA surveillance is about to heat up again. This week, the House will consider a measure that would require the NSA and other government agencies to follow due process and obtain a warrant to collect the communications of American citizens. Through an amendment to H.R. 5293, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2017, the House could defund warrantless government searches of the database of information collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
The amendment (pdf), proposed by Reps. Massie (R-Ky.), Lofgren (D-Calif.), and Poe (R-Texas), would prevent the NSA's backdoor spying on American citizens through the use of U.S. person identifiers.
The Massie-Lofgren-Poe amendment also prohibits government agencies from requesting that U.S. companies build security vulnerabilities into their hardware or software in order to make it easier for the government to access them. This would protect encryption, which has been undermined by the NSA's breathtaking extension of surveillance.
In a Wednesday morning letter to House leaders, 21 advocacy groups including FreedomWorks, R Street Institute, and Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), asked lawmakers to support the Massie amendment. This amendment is critical, the letter states, because "the government argues [Section 702] does not explicitly restrict deliberately querying communications of Americans that were 'incidentally' collected."
Most importantly, passage of this amendment would set the stage for next year's expiration of Section 702. This provision allows the NSA to sweep up the communications of American citizens when targeting foreign surveillance suspects. The backdoor search loophole created by Section 702 undermines the Fourth Amendment protection against search and seizure.
Although the Massie-Lofgren-Poe amendment is an important first step in securing privacy in the face of unconstitutional surveillance, this is not the last step in the battle to end Section 702. The threats posed by the NSA's use of Section 702 point out the importance of FreedomWorks' Digital Bill of Rights.
What is Section 702?
It is a provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a 1978 law that authorizes the NSA to collect the electronic communications and internet traffic through the targeted spying on specific and identified agents of foreign powers.
Section 702 creates a surveillance vacuum that collects information from and about individuals, often American citizens, who are unaffiliated with the foreign surveillance target. The interception of this information not only impedes our right to privacy, it can also be used by federal agencies in investigations that are unrelated to terrorism.
Currently, Section 702 is being used as an end-run around the Fourth Amendment. The National Security Agency (NSA) uses this provision to circumvent due process through communications collection methods that are as invasive as they are far-reaching.
Here is just how permissive the NSA's interpretation of targeting is:
Section 702 allows the NSA to intercept communications by anyone who is:
Outside the United States;
In the U.S. but their communications are backed up or stored abroad;
Inside the U.S. but using a VPN and their IP address looks like it is outside the U.S.;
Inside the U.S. but their IP address does not appear to be inside the US for any other wide variety of reasons. Inside the U.S. but located near a surveillance target.
However, most communications intercepted by Section 702 surveillance are from individuals who are:
A United States citizen or resident;
Located within the United States;
Not communicating with a foreign target.
In fact, a Washington Post investigation of 160,000 conversations collected under Section 702 between 2009 and 2012 found that 90 percent of the communications were not from foreign surveillance targets.
This means that Section 702 has the potential to affect 286,942,362 internet users in the United States. That's 88.5% of the country's population. The potential for harm through the collection of cell phone data is even greater; 92% of Americans own a cell phone and 68% own a smartphone.
The NSA's abuse of Section 702 is under increasing scrutiny.
In theory, Section 702 is inconsistent with our expectation of privacy; in practice, it is unconstitutional.
As FreedomWorks points out in Article I of The Digital Bill of Rights, the right to due process should be preserved in the digital realm. Just as in the physical world, digital searches and seizures must require a properly issued, individual warrant, and not be conducted arbitrarily or in bulk.
Government should not compromise citizens' right to secure data. Article V of the Digital Bill of Rights states that "Government should never demand, through the mandated use of back doors or weakened encryption standards, that companies put their clients' privacy at risk."
The amendment being considered by the House this week is consistent with the belief that the protections established in the Constitution serve Americans in the digital world just as effectively as they do in the real world. Please contact your representative and ask them to vote YES on the Massie-Lofgren-Poe amendment to H.R. 5293 and then endorse the Digital Bill of Rights by signing here.
ENDORSE THE DIGITAL BILL OF RIGHTS
Tags Digital Bill of Rights, Cybersecurity, encryption, congress, amendment, Thomas Massie
FreedomWorks-Digital-Bill-of-Rights.pdf
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/illinois-ballot-initiative-tax-hike-barely-disguise?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Illinois.png?itok=nvlVcdPU
Illinois Ballot Initiative is a Tax Hike Barely in Disguise
BY Sarah Anderson
A new constitutional amendment on the ballot that Illinoisans will face in November, the "Illinois Allow for Graduated Income Tax Amendment," could prove disastrous for the state's taxpayers and economy. Currently, the Illinois state constitution only allows for a flat income tax system. This amendment would repeal this constitutional requirement that the state's personal income tax is a flat rate across income, and instead allow the state to enact legislation for a graduated income tax.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/cdc-wants-own-your-property-now?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/For-rent-sign.jpg?itok=IHEiARk-
CDC Wants to Own Your Property Now
"America will never be a socialist nation," President Trump proudly proclaimed in his 2019 State of the Union Address. Sadly, as each day of this coronavirus pandemic wears on, these words seem to grow less and less prophetic. Just as we think we've reached our capacity for government intrusions into the daily lives of Americans, we're reminded that we may not have even scraped the surface.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/revised-earn-it-act-still-awful?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Encryption_0.png?itok=e1xGXO1b
The Revised EARN IT Act is Still Awful
BY Josh Withrow
About a month ago, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed Senator Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) EARN IT Act, S. 3398, setting up a potential full Senate vote. With very few legislative days left on the Senate's calendar between now and November's elections, it is highly possible that Senator Graham may try to quickly pass his bill. Although the bill is marketed as combatting child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) online, the bill was -- and, even after being amended, remains -- a thinly veiled assault on encryption.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/freedomworks\u2019-bill-month-july-2020-processing-revival-and-intrastate-meat-exemption-prime?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/cow.jpg?itok=TSf51Arn
FreedomWorks' Bill of the Month for July 2020: Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act, H.R. 2859/S. 1620
FreedomWorks is proud to announce that our bill of the month for July 2020 is the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act, H.R. 2859 and S. 1620, introduced in the House by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and in the Senate by Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Angus King (I-Maine). This bipartisan legislation would loosen restrictions so that meat processed in a state-licensed facility can be sold locally -- without regulation from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) -- in an effort to help address issues with our meat supply chain that have become glaringly obvious during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/earn-it-remains-thinly-veiled-assault-encryption?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Encryption.png?itok=3EWZ02tp
EARN IT Remains a Thinly Veiled Assault on Encryption
The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to mark up a bill that is a classic piece of Washington, D.C. misdirection. The Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies (EARN IT) Act, S. 3398, presents itself as a bill targeted at fighting the spread of child pornography (rebranded as "child sexual abuse material," or "CSAM"), which obviously no decent person would oppose. However, the actual impact of the bill reaches far beyond this purpose, simultaneously threatening both tech platforms' liability protections and their ability to deploy strong encryption for their users, endangering innocent Americans' security in the process.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/upcoming-house-committee-work-demands-action-freedom?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/house%20committees.jpeg?itok=vVmxVMr4
Upcoming House Committee Work Demands Action for Freedom
As usual, the attacks on liberty come from the left as well as from the right. While efforts by the left to expand the size and scope of government are more overt, those by the right cannot go unnoticed, either. In the coming weeks, House committees will meet to mark up legislation that could have drastic impacts on our liberties. Here are some things to watch out for in the days and weeks to come.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/freedomworks-praises-senate-action-amid-house-democrat-inaction?social=facebook_share"
FreedomWorks Praises Senate Action Amid House Democrat Inaction
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- In response to the Senate's decision to return to Washington this week and conduct business, Adam Brandon, FreedomWorks' President, commented:
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/support-processing-revival-and-intrastate-meat-exemption-prime-act-hr-2859-and-s-1620?social=facebook_share"
Support the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act, H.R. 2859 and S. 1620
On behalf of FreedomWorks' activist community, I urge you to contact your representative and senators ask them to cosponsor the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act, H.R. 2859 and S. 1620, introduced in the House by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and in the Senate by Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Angus King (I-Maine). The PRIME Act would directly help address currently-breaking meat supply chains.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/can-president-adjourn-congress-its-really-loaded-question?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Constitution_1.jpeg?itok=RX9W2G1I
Can a President Adjourn Congress? It's a Really Loaded Question
President Donald Trump suggested on Wednesday that he has the constitutional authority to adjourn Congress. The suggestion has been, unsurprisingly, panned by the media and legal scholars. The Constitution does actually provide some authority here, but the authority has never been used, leaving more questions than answers.
"https:\/\/www.freedomworks.org\/content\/take-step-back-moving-forward-framework?social=facebook_share"
https://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/plane.jpg?itok=kFmjcsK_
Take a Step Back from the Moving Forward Framework
Although the costs of inaction on infrastructure will continue to mount, it is essential that Congress present smart, fiscally responsible solutions. Unfortunately for the American people, the recent proposal put forward by House Democrats dubbed the "Moving Forward Framework" is neither smart nor fiscally responsible. In the words of Reason's Christian Britschgi, the plan from House Democrats is "heavy on funding ideas, but light on funding sources."