Posts Tagged 'Colin Firth'
Still More Prejudice
Posted in Movie Review, Movies, tagged Amy Brenneman, Bride And Prejudice, Bridget Jones's Diary -- movie review, Colin Firth, Emily Blunt, Hugh Dancy, Hugh Grant, Jimmy Smits, Kathy Baker, Kevin Zegers, Maggie Grace, Marc Blucas, Maria Bello, Moderate Movie Recommendation, Moderate To Strong Movie Recommendation, Pride And Prejudice, Renée Zellweger, RottenTomatoes.com, The Jane Austen Book Club -- movie review on February 13, 2018| Leave a Comment »
As promised a week back, I am reviewing a couple more "Jane Austen" related movies I've seen recently and adding a few comments to the two movie reviews I've already done.
The new reviews are for "The Jane Austen Book Club" and "Bridget Jones Diary". The comments are for "Pride and Prejudice" – the BBC 1995 version and the "American" 2005 version.
"The Jane Austen Book Club" (2007) — movie review
Six Californians – five women of varying ages and a man – start a monthly book club to discuss the works of Jane Austen, only to find that their own romantic relationships — previous and current — begin to resemble modern day adaptations of Austen's novels.
Sylvia (Amy Brenneman), is shocked when her husband Daniel (Jimmy Smits), leaves her after 20 plus years and three children to become involved with another lawyer at the firm he works at. Jocelyn (Maria Bello), her unmarried best friend, distracts herself from her unacknowledged loneliness by breeding dogs ("dominance issues"). Prudie (Emily Blunt) is a young French teacher, in possession of a worthy husband Dean (Marc Blucas), yet distracted by sexual fantasies with another man / boy (Kevin Zegers) named Trey. I say "boy" because Trey appears to be in high school / a student. The eldest female, many times married Bernadette (Kathy Baker) yearns for one more chance at happiness. Allegra (Maggie Grace), (Sylvia and Daniel's lesbian daughter,) has problems with her lover – who is a writer using Allegra's life stories as the basis for her own work. And Grigg (Hugh Dancy), the lone (rich and athletic) male joins the book circle because he's trying to form a relationship with Jocelyn.
As romantic movies go, this one is as good as most, but not particularly believable in any of the final results – all happily ever-afters. Be that as it is, I thought it was an okay movie. Mostly, it's entertaining without being sappy or taking the easy comedic route that many "chick-flicks" devolve into in order to keep hapless male partners watching to the end of the movie. What I found interesting were the few moments where the actors actually discussed the Austen books and more specifically the characters and views on love, romance, commitment and relationships in general. And, as stated in my prior review of P&P book, it prompted me to promote the original work to the top of my reading list.
Final recommendation: moderate to strong. Enjoyable as light entertainment, but I think your time is better spent actually reading Austen's works.
"Bridget Jones's Diary" (2001) — movie review
This movie was recommended to me by my daughter as a loosely based modern-day adaptation of Jane Austen's "Pride And Prejudice". It stars Renée Zellweger as Bridget Jones (Elizabeth Bennet character), Hugh Grant as Daniel Cleaver (George Wickham character / the cad) , and Colin Firth as Mark Darcy (Mr. Darcy character / the hero). I believe it's more accurately described as an adaptation of the book by the same name as the movie. The "only" two things I found similar to P&P was Firth played a character named Darcy in both the 1995 BBC version of P&P (and in this movie) and Darcy and Bridget have roughly the same relationship track to get to their happy ending. Boy and girl meet. Boy and girl detest each other. Boy comes around. Girl comes around. Issues about the cad. Happy ending.
The movie is a rom/com. Is it? Mildly romantic, yes. Mildly comedic, barely. To tell the truth, I don't get it. The overall review on RottenTomatoes.com is 80% for both reviewers and audience. Zellweger was nominated for Best Actress… Really? I don't get it. Somewhere in the character is a nice person struggling to overcome drinking, smoking, vulgar language and a terrible wardrobe. Other than that, she's just the kind of person you want to see your son bring home to meet you. Truth be told, I found her three friends in the movie much more interesting than Bridget and wished there were more of them and less of her. Hugh Grant was ok in the cad role, but I prefer him in the nice guy roles where his sardonic / ironic comedy work well with his charm. The most enjoyable part / character in the movie is Colin Firth's Darcy. While lacking the physicality of the 1995 P&P role, he still presents himself as a man's gentleman. I've seen Firth in at least a half-dozen roles and continue to enjoy his work.
So, final recommendation: moderate (at best). The movie wasn't bad, it just didn't appeal to me. Probably because I was hoping for something more closely aligned to P&P.
Having just read the original work by Austen, I've now gone back to re-watch the 1995 BBC adaptation and the 2005 movie version. What did I find? As much as I was critical of the annotations while reading the book, they were very helpful in understanding both versions of the movies. In addition to seeing where there were cinematic variances from the original work – in locations and dialogue – the notes explained some of the details which I completely missed in both earlier viewings. Reading the original work greatly enhanced my appreciation of the dialogue in both movies. Reading the notes, my appreciation of the parks / woods, carriages, gowns, and buildings. I guess I'm admitting I was incorrect in being overly critical of reading an annotated version of an original work. Preference change? Nope. If you prefer nuance and greater detail – BBC and 6-plus hours of viewing. If you prefer "Hollywood" looks and production – the two-hour 2005 is better. One minor comment on "production"… My DVD copy of the BBC version gets out of sync between the voice and picture in multiple places. I don't know if this is the discs or my PC, (it's probably my PC,) but I found it annoying and a slight negative in this review / comparison. And, finally, I tried to go back to see "Bride And Prejudice" (the Indian – modern-day version of P&P), but it didn't come up on NetFlix. I guess, I have to catch it sometime in the future when it comes back on-line.
2017 …And With It Civilization
2016 Just Like My Mother
2015 All Omissions Are Mine
Binge, Binge, Binge
Posted in Movie Review, Movies, TV Series, tagged Amber Rose Revah, Batman, BBC, Ben Barnes, Billy Russo, Bollywood, Bride And Prejudice, Chris Nolan, CIA, Colin Firth, Curtis Hoyle, Daniel Webber, Daredevil, David Lieberman / Micro, Deborah Ann Woll, Dinah Madani, Don Pendleton, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Elizabeth "Lizzy" Bennet, Frank Castle / Punisher, Greer Garson, Highly Recommended Series / Movie, Jaime Ray Newman, Jason R. Moore, Jennifer Ehle, John Wick, Jon Bernthal, Karen Page, Laurence Olivier, Lewis Wilson, Moderate Series / Movie Recommendation, Mr. Bingly, Mr. Darcy, Netflix, Paul Schulze, Pride And Prejudice, Sarah Lieberman / Micro's wife, Spiderman, Stranger Things, Strong To Highly recommended series / movies, The Executioner, The Punisher, William Rawlins on November 21, 2017| Leave a Comment »
Today's post will be a long one, so if you're not interested in my reviews, please come back another day…
The three series being reviewed are "Pride And Prejudice", "Stranger Things" and "The Punisher". P&P is on DVD and the other two were both viewed on NetFlix.
Pride And Prejudice (1940) — movie review; (1995) — series / movie review
Starring Laurence Olivier as Mr. Darcy and Greer Garson as Elizabeth "Lizzy" Bennet, this is the black and white version which appears on cable channels periodically – which is where I caught it one afternoon while casually channel surfing. Because I enjoyed the 2005 version, so much and the 1995 version, too, I thought I'd give it a view. The story is essentially: small village with landowner family of five female daughters is thrown in a tizzy over the arrival of a very "suitable" bachelor. Even better, the bachelor comes with a friend, who is also a very suitable bachelor (Darcy). Lizzy takes an immediate dislike to Mr. Darcy while the oldest sister (Jane) falls madly in love with the first bachelor (Mr. Bingly). Blah, blah, blah, happy ending.
In this version, I was left with a "satisfied" grin. It was enjoyable to watch, and, because I'm so familiar with the story, I'm looking for my favorite parts. Unfortunately, while Olivier and Garson "seemed" good in their roles individually, to me, they lacked the chemistry to make the story believable. There are also a couple of changes in the film which I found curious. For one, the costumes seemed more modern and more American than British. This impression may be just in comparison to the 1995 version. Another difference was that Darcy's aunt refuses the marriage to Lizzy as a test of her love, whereas in the other versions, the aunt is doing it for reasons of societal class difference and because the aunt believes Darcy to be "given / promised" to her own daughter since childhood. Basically, it makes the aunt a redeemable character, which I don't believe she was meant to be. I guess, I'll have to read the book to find out ultimately.
Final recommendation: moderate. It's okay. I guess anything with Olivier is considered a "classic". I say it has historical interest, just as I enjoyed "Bride And Prejudice" (2004) because of the Indian / Bollywood interpretation. (Review here.)
Having watched the 1940's version, I decided to re-watch the 1995 BBC version. Starring Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy and Jennifer Ehle as Elizabeth Bennet, this is widely considered one of the great BBC television productions of all time. Running time is not quite 5-1/2 hours long and therefore this version has the time to flesh out the characters more than the more recent 2005 film version which I have seen multiple times. My daughter (Rebecca) says she considers this the "definitive" adaptation of the novel to film. I beg to differ with my favorite being the 2005 version. I would put this a very close second though.
With this second viewing and having seen some of his other works, I am thoroughly a Colin Firth fan. He kills this role. Even though I've seen this version before, I must admit, I didn't really remember it. It has time to add a lot more to the story and IMHO, this makes the whole version better. There is a "famous" scene of Darcy approaching a lake on his property. If you know much about England, you know that even on the warmest of days, open water is rarely warm. This is actually one of the reasons accidental drowning is so common there (several hundred each year). Anyway, Darcy is despondently approaching a lake and my first instinct was "plot twist, this isn't going to end well". But then, of course, we get the now famous and career making wet T-shirt (ok, it's a cotton long-sleeved pullover) scene of Darcy stumbling upon Lizzy on his way to the house to dry off. Ladies still swoon… LOL
Final recommendation: Highly!! I struggle to find things to criticize about this version. Okay, it's longer than the 2005 movie and Mrs. Bennet and Kitty are much more annoying in this version, but this slight comment is simply evidence of how good the whole is. Well, worth re-visiting!
Stranger Things (2016 / 2017) — series review
Stranger Things is a two-season (so far) science-fiction, horror, coming of age made for NetFlix series. There are 17 episodes. Eight in the first year and nine in the second. The series occurs in the 1980's, in a rural / sub-urban town in the mid-west (Indiana). The series has lots of references and homages to earlier works of music and film from that period. The series was recommended to me by my son (James), who advised me it was "MUST" see. Even more than THOR, the (at that time) up-coming Justice League, Punisher or Longmire… So, okay. I watched it. The series is very much an ensemble cast so I'm not going to bother listing all fifteen to twenty of the "main" actors.
Absolutely, terrific!! The series has adults, older teens, younger teens, nerds, jocks and just regular folks. It also has hell-hound aliens, extra-dimensions, mind-control, telekinesis and X-mas lights! My son said, he hopes I don't scare easily at night or I'll have to watch all 17 hours straight through. It wasn't anywhere near THAT intense, but it is very good. Basically, I'm (again) late to the party and this was the smash hit for NetFlix last year. I'm jumping in here, one month after the release of the second season. As per normal for NetFlix, the whole series for the year is released on the same day to encourage binge watching. So, I did. Season 1 on day 1 and Season 2 on the following day.
But, what is the show about? Well, there's a government experiment gone wrong. They are developing children into "X-men", with various abilities. Season one is mostly about a girl with telekinesis abilities. Season two brings in her "sister". Not really her sister, but they grew up together. So, girl escapes and meets young boy from town. Fall in love, blah, blah, blah. In the meantime, the government agency has accidentally opened a gate into another dimension, which is a lot like ours, but it has been conquered by an alien (large spider-like shadow) which controls a bunch of little flesh eating aliens. At the end of Season one, the girl saves her friends and the world by closing the portal. Season two opens a year later and girl is still missing and the original abducted kid knows the aliens are coming back. Blah, blah, blah, teen angst, blah, blah, blah, child angst, blah, blah, blah, adult angst. Big finale, the kids kick alien butt and the girl saves the world. Afterwards, smoochy, smoochy at the Winter Ball.
Final recommendation: Strong to highly. This is a well made combination of practically every kids science-fiction movie you've ever seen. Some of the references are almost (but not quite) tongue in cheek, but they work and this is a series well worth the time to watch it. I'm not sure if I'll watch it again soon, but I'm almost certainly up for another binge before the release of season 3, next year. I would caution that although kids play predominant roles in this series, this is NOT for below age-12 viewing. Some scenes can be intense and there is a moderate amount of alien violence.
The Punisher (2017) — series review
This series is a spinoff from the DareDevil series also on NetFlix. The Punisher appeared in season two – and pretty much took it over – so, now he has his own show. Basically, the family of a military expert is killed and he takes revenge against the killers. In DareDevil, he does most of the work. In this series, he almost finishes the job. He leaves one guy, who he promises to come back for. Blah, blah, blah. Segue to season two…
Does it work and is it any good? If you like this kind of thing (explosions, excessive violence, gratuitous sexual scenes, explosions, hand-to-hand combat, lots and lots of guns and gun fire, and did I mention explosions), and I do, then you'll enjoy this series. And, I did. So, I enjoyed it… The question was is it any good? As a comic book adaptation, it is very good. As an action / adventure / who-dun-it, it's pretty good. As a realistic portrayal of armed and unarmed combat, uh, it's a comic book…
The series stars Jon Bernthal as Frank Castle / Punisher, Ebon Moss-Bachrach as his partner David Lieberman / Micro, Ben Barnes as Billy Russo (Frank's wartime friend who ends up being a bad guy), Amber Rose Revah as Dinah Madani (Homeland Security Officer), Daniel Webber as Lewis Wilson (a confused Vet who becomes a domestic terrorist), Paul Schulze as William Rawlins (the main gov / CIA bad guy from "the war"), Jason R. Moore as Curtis Hoyle (the Vet "do-gooder" medic), Jaime Ray Newman as Sarah Lieberman / Micro's wife, and Deborah Ann Woll as Karen Page (a carry over from Daredevil).
The series is mostly dark, in the same vein as the DareDevil series, the Chris Nolan / Batman movie trilogy, and the recent John Wick movies. It deals with a host of issues, from right and wrong, free press, privacy, vigilantism, friendship, personal loss, and a rather bizarre attitude that "justice" almost always ends with violence – particularly gun violence. While the depiction of violence is pretty accurate, the depiction of physical recovery is essentially: "and then a miracle happens." There are scars, but recovery is almost instantaneous. Like I said: comic book…
Final recommendation: moderate. This series would be rated higher if they had let the actors simply act more and kill / maim less. It is definitely for mature audiences ONLY. It feels strange to say (admit) it, but I enjoyed the acting and the story more than I did the violence. Go figure…
Final comment: I was not a follower of "The Punisher" character in the comic reading days of my youth. I was reading them when he was introduced in DareDevil and Spiderman, but the character never "really" captured my pre-teen and teen imagination. During my Army days though, I was an avid follower of "The Executioner" book series written by Don Pendleton, which was the basis for the comic character. The monthly book series currently runs to over 400 episodes and is being ghost written since Pendleton's sale of the series and subsequent death.
Thanks to any who managed to make it through the entire post. Let me know if you agree / disagree with my reviews…
2016 Feeling Warm Yet?
Four Documentaries
2015 Just Like All The Others
2014 In My Own Vanity
2013 Filled With Words
2012 Lectio Auget Existentiae Meae
2011 Lied Lately?
2010 Born To Work At Faux News
Lost Again (Uh, Make That Still)
Qui Genus Humanum Ingenio Superavit
They're Back… (Part 1)
More Prejudice
Posted in Movies, tagged Aishwarya Rai, Amritsar, Bollywood, Bride & Prejudice - movie review, Chandra Lamba, Charlotte Lucas, Colin Firth, Elizabeth "Lizzy" Bennet, India, Jane Austen, Jennifer Ehle, Keira Knightley, Lalita Bakshi, Martin Henderson, Matthew Macfadyen, Mr. Darcy, Pride And Prejudice, Sonali Kulkarni, Strong Recommendation on November 18, 2015| Leave a Comment »
Bride & Prejudice – movie review
I recently watched the Indian / Bollywood adaptation of Jane Austen's novel "Pride and Prejudice", slightly retitled as "Bride & Prejudice" (2004). To demonstrate my lack of culture, I first became aware of Austen and "Prejudice" when I saw the 2005 version with Keira Knightley and Matthew MacFadyen in the lead roles of Elizabeth "Lizzy" Bennet and Mr. Darcy. I don't remember when I first saw the movie, but I believe it was somewhere around 2010. I have since watched it at least a half dozen times. I'm not sure what it is, but I find the whole story and setting fascinating. I have also watched the 1995 version made for BBC TV starring Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle as Darcy and Elizabeth. I must admit Ehle doesn't hold a candle to Knightley, but Firth is every bit as good as MacFadyen, even though he doesn't have the physical presence of MacFadyen. In any case, because this is a series instead of a movie, I must say I prefer the series because there is more time to develop the characters.
Okay, enough background. Back to the actual movie review…
In this version of the Jane Austen novel, Mr. William (aka Fitzwilliam) Darcy is an American played by Martin Henderson and Lizzie Bennett becomes Lalita Bakshi who is played by Aishwarya Rai. The unmarried sisters (Lalita is the second oldest) and their family are plugged into a modern plot that spans London, Los Angeles, Bombay / Mumbai and Goa. The family and four daughters live in Amritsar, India (a country town) — which is trying to be true to original Austen story, but which has its own airport, so I'm not real sure how "true" that is.
The movie has the most problems because it can't make up its mind whether it wants to be a romantic drama or a musical-romantic-comedy. It tries to be both and therefore doesn't really succeed at either. To be honest, most of the numbers made no sense and I would have preferred they went for more drama. Having said this, I have seen a few other Bollywood movies and I think they were just trying to sell to their home market. Other than that, the big problem was how to bring the story up to modern day times. The plot device here was to make the characters international and hence the side trips (LA and London) being used to demonstrate the wealth of the Americans and the Londoners.
How is the acting? Sadly, just so-so. Henderson fails to strike the right notes (for me) as Darcy. Darcy is the character which most draws me to the story (and I'm not sure why), but Henderson lacks the physicality of MacFadyen or British style of Firth. Aishwarya is obviously the most beautiful of the Lizzie's, but she seems wooden in this role. I have not seen her in anything else so I don't know if beauty is all there is or not, but from this role I'd judge it is. Strangely enough, I didn't even find Aishwarya to be the most camera "friendly". I thought that honor went to the actress Sonali Kulkarni as Chandra Lamba (Charlotte Lucas – Lizzie's best friend in the British versions).
Does the movie work, though? Is it entertaining? Yes and yes. I liked the dancing and most of the songs. The colors and the energy of India are very attractive. Even though the acting wasn't quite what I thought it could be, the movie is another Austen happy ending. Final recommendation: strong recommendation as the Indian version of P&P, particularly if you are a "Prejudice" fan – as I am turning out to be.
2014 Say What?
2013 Daring Errors
2012 Are You Comfortable?
I Just Have To
2011 True New
2010 A Job Well Started Is A Job Half Done
I See With My One Good Eye
Bourne Bond
Posted in Included Video, Movies, Quotes, Videos, tagged Casino Royale, Colin Firth, David Niven, Galahad / Harrry Hart, Highly Recommended Movie, Included Video, James Bond, Jason Bourne, Kingsman: The Secret Service - movie review, Music Videos, Quotes, Roger Moore, Samuel L. Jackson / Valentine, Sean Connery, Sofia Boutella / Gazelle, Take That, Taron Egerton / Gary Eggsy Unwin, The Karate Kid, William of Wykeham, Winchester College and New College Oxford on July 2, 2015| Leave a Comment »
Manners maketh man.
— William of Wykeham
Motto of Winchester College and New College, Oxford
Kingsman: The Secret Service – movie review
Last week I had the great pleasure to watch a wonderfully entertaining coming of age / spy movie that harkened back to "The Karate Kid" and the early days of 007 – James Bond (humor and sophistication) with a healthy dash of Jason Bourne (cars and fights) thrown in for good measure. Without giving away too much of the movie, an older, experienced espionage agent recruits an off-the-street knock-about with (wait for it) a good heart. Of course, the kid is also a bored genius and former junior national-class gymnast. Blah, blah, blah. Lots of life lessons, fights, car chases, and more fights later, you're left thinking: "Wow! That was a great movie!"
Now, of course I don't mean it's going to get nominated for any Oscar's or anything like that… It's just a very entertaining action movie. Colin Firth is surprisingly good as Mr. Miyagi – I mean as Galahad / Harry Hart. I don't recall ever seeing him in this kind of action role before. Kudos for stretching the envelope. Taron Egerton plays Gary "Eggsy" Unwin – the kid. Samuel L. Jackson plays the evil genius bent on taking over the world – Valentine. And, Sofia Boutella delivers a cutting-edge performance as the evil henchman (okay, henchperson) Gazelle. Seriously, Jackson plays the role of a lifetime as one of the James Bond way-over-the-top villains from the early (Sean Connery) and middle period (Roger Moore days). The film even nods to the classic Bond send up – Casino Royale (with David Niven playing 007) – with poofing heads instead of hickups.
Lastly, the film has a great song. EVERY great Bond film has a great song. (You can hear it below performed by Take That.) So, final recommendation: Very High Recommendation! Action, humor, special effects. This one has it all. One note: this movie has a sexual "joke" at the end of the movie. It will be offensive to some (many?) and is not appropriate for youth – hence the "R" rating. In the words of Merlin: "Oh. Oh my word!"
2014 Brains First
2013 Not Listening Anymore
2012 At Your Marks!
2011 We Are Not Alone
Underlying Rationality
2010 Is the Obama Administration Failing?
Quite Please!
In A Hostage Situation…
Flip-flopping…
Proof of Choice…
On "Leading" A Democracy To War…
Actually, It's All About Me…
Waiting In Line At Starbuck's
Posted in Environment, Politics, Quotes, tagged Coffee, Colin Firth, Environment, Politics, Quotes on April 4, 2011| Leave a Comment »
When I visited coffee farms in Ethiopia, the farmers could not believe we spend a week's wages in their country on a cup of coffee in ours…
— Colin Firth
The King Is Oscar
Posted in Faith Family and Friends, General Comments, Movies, Places, Walking, tagged Academy Awards, Ashton Kutcher, Colin Firth, Family and Friends, General Comments, Inception, Kevin Cosner, Lafayette Reservoir, Matrix, Movies, Oscar, Places, The Guardian - movie review, The King's Speech, Transformers, Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen - movie review, Walking on February 27, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Well, if there was much doubt about my review the other day about "The King's Speech", it was laid to rest tonight when the movie won Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor and Best Screenplay at the 83rd Academy Awards. Bravo Colin Firth! Well done, lad!
I must admit, "Inception" did not do as well as I thought it was going to when I first saw it. I felt it was a brilliant movie and would have a long term impact on the industry and society – much like "Matrix" did. But it ("Inception") never has. It also won several awards tonight, but they were technical awards mostly about sound.
Friday night, I re-watched "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen". I must admit it was much better on the smaller screen and I was able to follow the fight action much better with the limited view of having everything directly in front of me instead of having to shift my eyes or head as I would have to do at a theater. I'm going to watch T:I and T:II again before T:III comes out later this year. I think, so far, the first was better than the sequel because the first had more (and better) humor, but T:II had some pretty good moments too. I particularly like the action shot of the carrier being destroyed by the Transformer bad-guy "meteors". That was a very well done action sequence.
Last night (Saturday), I re-watched "The Guardian" with Kevin Cosner and Ashton Kutcher. It's a cross between "An Officer And A Gentleman" and "The Karate Kid", but it really works for me. They both worked individually (for me) so there is no reason to think a combo wouldn't. The movie is about the US Coast Guard elite jump-swimmers (they jump from helicopters) who save lives at sea. Of the two, I'd rate Guardian over T:II if only because it was less comic bookish. All in all, a good weekend for watching movies and relaxing.
Non-Movie Notes:
Friday I got a permanent crown put in. I got the temp a couple of weeks ago.
Yesterday, Hil and I went out for another meal with Donnie (my son's god father). He's going away on vacation for a couple of months, so it was kind of a farewell dinner.
Hil and I went for an afternoon walk around Lafayette Reservoir this afternoon, after church. It was beautiful – sunny but with a nice cool breeze. It felt good to spend some time out with Hil – just walking and enjoying the air, view and each other's company.