Surveillance in Pakistan exceeds legal capacity: report
Dawn.comPublished July 22, 2015
A report published by London-based advocacy group Privacy International claims that the practical surveillance capacity of the Pakistani government and Inter-Services Intelligence Agency (ISI) has exceeded local and international regulation laws for surveillance.
The report released on Tuesday claims that mass network surveillance has been taking place in Pakistan since at least 2005. Pakistani intelligence agencies have allegedly abused their communications surveillance powers by spying on politicians and apex court judges. It further adds that internet censorship and widespread monitoring has been employed to target activists, lawyers and journalists.
The government obtained technology for surveillance from local as well as some foreign companies such as Ericsson, Alcatel, Huawei, SS8 and Utimaco.
Furthermore, the condition of communications surveillance in Pakistan has also been outlined in the report, and the vague laws that supervise it have been compared to international human rights law standards.
The report also claims that Pakistan participated in international intelligence operations by the US National Security Agency (NSA) and the UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). Meanwhile, Pakistan has allegedly been subject to those operations as well.
In 2013, the ISI allegedly called for the commissioning of a mass surveillance system to tap international undersea fibre optic cables, the report said. However, it was not mentioned whether Pakistan went ahead with this new surveillance system in recent times.
Surveillance in Pakistan
More than 70 per cent of the country's population has mobile phone subscriptions, and an estimated 11 per cent of the population uses the internet, the report said. This makes surveillance in Pakistan advanced and comprehensive as there are currently 50 operational internet providers and five mobile phone operators.
Some of the interception of Pakistani phone networks has been unlawful, the report claims. A case at the Supreme Court pertaining to phone tapping showed that the ISI allegedly tapped 6,523 phones in February, 6,819 in March and 6,742 in April this year.
The Pakistani military and intelligence have allegedly received high levels of funding from governments abroad in order to develop an advanced surveillance infrastructure due to the country's role in countering insurgents and Islamist groups. The report claims that agencies within the government went forward with mass storage and capture of communications of ordinary citizens. On the other hand, in the past they had mainly referred to tactical military surveillance tools.
The report also claims that the Peshawar school attack in 2014, which claimed 150 lives, has been cited as a reason to increase surveillance of communications in the country and popular support for it is high.
The report stated that Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) requires all Internet Service Providers (ISP) to provide the authority with information on their clients. As an anti-terrorism measure, PTA allegedly ordered all phone service providers and ISP to ban virtual private networks (VPN) and encryption. Banning their use has a negative impact on, journalists and sources for instance, to safely communicate information pertaining to public interest, the report elaborates.
The report claims that the PTA's licensing requires all phone service providers to make their networks 'lawful interception-compliant'. This allows them to have access to their data.
Pakistan's cooperation in international surveillance
The government of Pakistan is known to be the largest recipient of funds from the NSA and it is allegedly involved in surveillance against its own citizens, the report claims. Pakistan is also NSA's third party partner, which means that the relationship between the two is considered to be long-term, involving "higher degrees of trust" and "greater levels of cooperation".
The report adds that the NSA would "willing to share advanced techniques…in return for that partner's willingness to do something politically risky".
Pakistan's relationship with the NSA is valued to the extent that the US agency allegedly maintains a 'special collection service' at its embassy and consulates in Pakistan, the report claims.
Pakistani phone service providers such as Telenor, Warid, Ufone, Mobilink and Pakistan Telecommunications Limited (PTCL) have allegedly provided legal interception access and monitoring centres over the years.
Recommendations to defence committee, foreign companies and governments
The report also contains recommendations on how Pakistan may be able to shift from its current surveillance model to one that is not a threat to democracy and complies with human rights laws.
It recommends the senate committee on defence to carry out an investigation into NSA's surveillance in Pakistan and the legality of their actions, as well as the extent of arrangements made between the country's intelligence agencies and the NSA. Furthermore, it recommends that the committee should also conduct an investigation into GCHQ's alleged access to the Pakistan Internet Exchange.
To foreign companies the report recommends periodic reviews of the government's use of technology sold to them and decline further maintenance or updates if ultimately the use is not in accordance to contractual obligations. It further says that usage should be made clear in contractual agreements which include human rights safeguards and safety against unlawful usage.
The report also recommends that foreign governments and export control authorities conduct detailed audits of security cooperation provided by law enforcement, military or intelligence agencies in Pakistan since 2000, in order to deduce if such cooperation led to human rights violations.
Furthermore, it recommends ensuring human rights criteria are added to the export control provisions for surveillance technologies. The report adds that the provisions should also consider national legal frameworks and records of electronic surveillance usage.
The report concludes that laws in Pakistan should be updated in accordance with international legal standards. This includes the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights. Furthermore, it adds that the government must also seek reforms from international bodies such as the UN Human Rights Committee in regard to interference with rights through communications surveillance.
Security heightened in capital as PDM gears up for rally outside ECP
Pakistan approves another Covid-19 vaccine
NAB overlooked Sherpao's 'dubious' transactions, UK arbitrator rules
While US and UK are spying on every country in the world.
Ali Gee
Make basic IT & coding education compulsory in every school because that is the future
Gen. Raheel behind this?
Blame it on India.
Spying on Politicians?? Have they caught anyone red handed embezzling and looting money?
Sandhu
When US and UK spy to whole world then it is good and when Pakistani agencies do the same then it becomes illegal. Waooo what a mess
Daood
All the mentioned people should be spied upon. Thats what keep them honest
usman
This is an internal matter of Pakistan and Pakistani agencies should go further if they see fit
So why is UK spying on Pakistan ? What does international law say about that ??
parveez
Good on Pakistan, carry on the good work, if this bring peace in the country, then thats the way to go. UK have more surveillance cameras then the rest of the world put together. I have been asked were I got the money six hundred pounds to pay for my gas and electric bill. Thats how they are concerned about money laundering. So no one should complain.
Why is London based firm interested for privacy of Pakistanis, they shouldn't interfere in Pakistan. Second why this London based rights group is not reporting spying and survalence of British Muslims. For these groups stop interfering in Pakistan and Mind your business
@Baba Black Sheep don't you worry your Indian govt is doing more survalence then Pakistan
they should enhance their capability and spy on other countries too...
qudrat ullah
i welcome this surveillance step of the government as its most needed in wake of terrorism scare and assure my full support to government and agencies who are doing a commendable job.
sajeel
Why is international media very concerned about Pakistan spying on its politicians? Why are they concerned about everything which ensures safe Pakistan?
Jul 23, 2015 12:42am
i dont mind suvelance as far as they curb on terrorism.
Rizwan Haroon
This is the most important work required to save our country from bad sheeps
@Shak no they all joined forces to reach a common goal. Apparently that goal its not the safety of this country and its people.
@Baba Yes that's how we have been living our lives. We blame it on India and West. Its a common flaw in our nations people..
As long as it is to counter terror threats it's fine. People who do bad stuff are worried about this. If you are not doing anything bad you shouldn't worry about it. Simple.
lahorewala
We are in 4th generation war.And we are not SAFMA or any anti-Pakistan NGOs so why should we be worried by this survaillance. I don't mind it. Any measure that can protect us must be welcomed. Every nation does it.
surprise, surprise.... not.
The company is actively preserving the environment by using cutting-edge technology and modern methods of resource utilisation.
Arab League head hopes Biden changes Trump Mideast policies
Makers of Saif Ali Khan-starrer Amazon web series issue 'unconditional apology' following BJP uproar
Banigala police station staff removed on PM's complaint
India shock Australia to clinch final Test by 3 wickets, take series 2-1
5 times as many troops in US capital than Afghanistan, Iraq combined ahead of Biden inauguration
Trump might be leaving the White House but his 'baby blimp' has found a home in Museum of London
Spotted in Sialkot, PM Imran Khan's lookalike has Twitter on a roll