Added and Discouraged Workers in the Late 1930s: A Re-Examination
T. Aldrich Finegan, Robert A. Margo
NBER Historical Working Paper No. 45
Issued in April 1993
NBER Program(s):Program on the Development of the American Economy
We revisit a famous controversy in labor economics: the debate between W.S. Woytinsky and Clarence Long over "added" and "discouraged" worker effects in the late 1930s. According to Woytinsky, the Depression created large numbers of added workers, persons who entered the labor force when the head of the household became unemployed. Long, on the other hand, believed that the number of added workers was trivial compared with the number of discouraged workers, and subsequent research has largely supported Long. Using a sample of married women drawn from the public use sample of the 1940 census, we show that added worker effect was alive and well in the late 1930s, but that its viability was muted by the operation of work relief. Wives whose husbands held "public emergency work relief" jobs with the Works Progress Administration (WPA) or related agencies were far less likely to participate in the labor force than wives whose husbands were employed in a private sector or non-relief government job, or whose husbands were unemployed, so much so that the added worker effect disappears in the aggregate if the impact of work relief is ignored.
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/h0045
Published: Journal of Economic History, Volume 54 (March 1994): 64-84
Stephens Jr. w8260 Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect
Long The Labor Force in Severe Depressions
Lundberg w0706 The Added-Worker Effect: A Reappraisal
Mincer Labor Force Participation of Married Women: A Study of Labor Supply
Potscher and Prucha t0085 On the Formulation of Uniform Laws of Large Numbers: A Truncation Approach