Hillary and the DNC Front Group November 8, 2017
Posted by Dr. Robert Owens in Politics, Politiocal Philosophy.
Tags: Bernie Sanders, Democrat primary rigged, DNC, Donna Brazile, Dr. Robert Owens, election rigged, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Seth Rich
In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election and during the ensuing campaign the Democratic National Committee acted as a front group for the Hillary campaign. If not breaking laws certainly trampling on the spirit of the law in its unbridled pursuit of power.
The DNC sold its soul to the Hillary campaign. Donna Brazile was the interim head of the DNC during and right after the election. She took over after the artful dodger, Debbie Wasserman Schultz who had been run out of Dodge after leaked emails should the depth of her complicity in the rigged primary. According to Ms. Brazile, "Debbie was not a good manager. She hadn't been very interested in controlling the party—she let Clinton's headquarters in Brooklyn do as it desired. …"
Brazille wanted to explain to Bernie Sanders whether or not the leaked emails which had brought down the former Chair concerning the way Hillary had rigged the primary were true.
It took her months to ferret out the truth from DNC staffers and former Hillary campaign operatives all working overtime to keep their previous plots and plans from seeing the light of day.
Hillary said, "the party from the ground up … when our state parties are strong, we win. That's what will happen."
In reality the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary's campaign was holding.
Politico described this arrangement as "essentially … money laundering" for the Clinton campaign while Hillary hypocritically made campaign finance reform part of her platform.
After months of stonewalling by Hillary's former campaign people and their fellow travelers in the DNC Barzile found an "agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings."
Here's how Barzile explained the unusual nature of Hillary's control of the DNC, "When the party chooses the nominee, the custom is that the candidate's team starts to exercise more control over the party. If the party has an incumbent candidate, as was the case with Clinton in 1996 or Obama in 2012, this kind of arrangement is seamless because the party already is under the control of the president. When you have an open contest without an incumbent and competitive primaries, the party comes under the candidate's control only after the nominee is certain. When I was manager of Gore's campaign in 2000, we started inserting our people into the DNC in June. This victory fund agreement, however, had been signed in August 2015, just four months after Hillary announced her candidacy and nearly a year before she officially had the nomination."
That's right only four months after she declared her candidacy Hillary took effective control of the DNC. Bernie never had a chance and all the insiders knew it from the beginning. Before the Wikileaks email dump Bernie was ignorant of this though he continually said that the system was rigged. He even predicted a contested convention. How that must have brought smiles to the faces of the backroom hacks running the Democrat slight-of-hand. After it was revealed Bernie endorsed Hillary, tried to bring the Sandernistas with him, and campaigned vigorously for a woman he knew to be totally corrupt.
All of this evidence of Hillary's campaign irregularities has been exposed by Donna Brazile a long-time Democrat operative and one-time faux journalist on the Clinton News Network. Remember she was with CNN she funneled the questions to Hillary before the debate. The rats are leaving the ship indeed.
As the cover is pulled off the cover-up one of the strange things about this expose' is that Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was killed in Washington, D.C. last year was one of the people listed in the dedication to Ms. Brazile's book. And how she describes her reaction to Mr. Rich's untimely death is another interesting view into the operations of what may well be described as a criminal enterprise disguised as a political party. Brazile writes that after Rich's unsolved murder, she feared for her life, shutting blinds so snipers could not see her, and placing surveillance cameras inside her home.
And from the Surprise-Surprise-Surprise Department, "Network newscasts don't mention Brazile Clinton-DNC revelations."
I have to echo President Trump on this one, "Everybody is asking why the Justice Department (and FBI) isn't looking into all of the dishonesty going on with Crooked Hillary & the Dems." Which was followed by another comment I believe most of us would agree with, "At some point the Justice Department, and the FBI, must do what is right and proper. The American public deserves it!"
That's right. We deserve to know the truth. We can't depend on the ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBCNPRPBS Cartel to get the news out. We need to do it ourselves. Tell everyone you know, tweet it, post it, re-post spread the word far and near. Hillary and New York's Sixth Crime Family are the ones who have attempted to subvert our republic for their personal gain. And now they are trying to reverse the results of last year's election through a silent coup.
Stand up for what's right. Or you'll fall for what's wrong.
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion. He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2017 Contact Dr. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens or visit Dr. Owens Amazon Page / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens
We Need More Special Counsels May 24, 2017
Tags: DNC wikileaks, Dr. Robert Owens, Obama's birth certificate, Seth Rich, Special Counsel, Special Prosecutor
The original accusation, the underlying premise for the entire hissy fit by the chronic sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome's about Russian collusion was that the Russians hacked the DNC and gave the emails to Wikileaks.
Recently Internet entrepreneur and hacker, Kim DotCom, admitted that he was part of an operation along with Seth Rich, an employee of the DNC to get internal emails to Wikileaks.
Now we have proof that this underlying premise was a lie all along. We now know that the person who really did give the DNC emails to Wikileaks didn't have to hack in, because he was an insider to begin with: Seth Rich.
We also know that Seth Rich was mysteriously killed in Washington DC on July 8, 2016, 27 and that the Metro Police are slow walking the investigation. The police say it was a botched robbery. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch, and phone.
In August Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich. Julian Assange also suggested in August that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant. Kim Dotcom tweeted out that he has evidence Seth Rich, the murdered DNC operative, is the Wikileaks source. He's ready to release the evidence to Congressional investigators. It doesn't seem as if anyone in Washington is interested since this shines a light on the lie that started it all.
There is so much about this that is interesting. Such as, the fact that the DNC leaders, Hillary Clinton, and Podesta, never disputed what was said in the emails. They instead attacked how the information was leaked. The media of course misdirected as best they could to cover up the facts. Look at who made the accusations not at the accusations themselves.
If there was any fraud in the last election cycle it was the DNC fat cats stacking the deck against Bernie Sanders in the primaries.
I continue to ask if the Russians hacked the election and Hillary won the popular vote whose side were they on. Just ask yourself: who would the Russians rather have as president of the United States a corrupt politician that everyone in the world knows can be bribed or a billionaire who says, "Drill Baby drill" when their economy is based on oil?
Now we have a Special Counsel to investigate a non-crime that probably makes sense inside the beltway and through the looking glass.
Why not have a Special Counsel to investigate Bill Clinton's visit with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Arizona. How about one to investigate all the people illegally leaking confidential material in an attempt to thwart the Trump agenda? What about one to investigate how many people were illegally unmasked by Susan Rice and the rest of the Obama hit machine?
If we're going to empanel Special Counsels to investigate rumors why stop until we've investigated them all?
Where are the over 30,000 emails deleted by Hillary Clinton?
If the massive donations to the Clinton Foundations weren't thinly veiled bribes why did they dry up as soon as Hillary lost the election?
Special Counsels like Special Prosecutors take on a life of their own. Which is eventually close to the half-life of a radioactive material, it lives on and on and on. They need convictions to justify the bloated staffs and budgets that they acquire in years of so-called investigations.
Look at the case of who leaked the name of Valerie Plame. The whole thing started with an article on July 14, 2003, by Robert Novak, journalist for The Washington Post. This article named Plame as a CIA operative effectively ending her career. Before the Special Prosecutor was even named people in the government knew that the source of the leak was Richard Armitage. However he was an insider, a member of the establishment, so he couldn't end up as the fall guy.
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald pushed and prodded until he was able to catch someone in a discrepancy between multiple interviews over several years. Then he prosecuted Scooter Libby for that discrepancy and got a conviction. It was not for revealing Plame's name but for impeding the investigation into something that was already known before the investigation began.
Back in 1980 when Ronald Reagan won shocking the Democrat establishment they demanded an investigation of his Presidential campaign saying they made a deal with Iran to delay the release of American hostages until after the election. How else could this has been actor beat a sitting president as successful as Jimmy Carter? That's when Tom Foley the Democrat leader of the House said, "We have no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, but the seriousness of the allegations, and the weight of circumstantial information, compel an effort to establish the facts." As long as we are going to continue to follow the Democrat's criteria for investigations let's go for the Holy Grail.
Let's investigate the report that Obama's Kenyan (paternal) grandmother, as well as his half-brother and half-sister testified that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the president claims. And there is reported testimony from a Mombasa science teacher and the Mombasa Registrar of births that Obama's birth certificate from Mombasa is genuine. This report shows a copy of President Obama's birth certificate that Lucas Smith obtained through the help of a Kenyan Colonel who got it recently directly from the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
So, if we're going to have Special Counsels let's have a bunch of them. Let's look into every rumor and accusation in Washington. That should cause enough gridlock to hopefully protect us from all the help the perpetually re-elected continue to force upon us. Maybe then we could live our lives in peace as they all scurry into the shadows like roaches when you turn on the light.
Drain the swamp!
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion. He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2017 Contact Dr. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens