Tag Archives: crime
On gardening and civilized society
2019-08-10 Raoul Popcivilization, crime, gardening, people, society 1 Comment
Ever since we've begun the restoration work on the historical monuments in the Transylvanian countryside (see Asociatia P.A.T.R.U. for the details), I've had to tend to the landscaping, among other things. And if there's one thing you learn when you garden, is that you have to prune the weeds constantly. Some weeds you simply cannot just pull out and throw in a compost pile, they're so invasive that you must burn them in order to stop them from spreading.
Yet in our modern, civilized society, we are led to believe that we must tolerate the weeds, including the really nasty ones. That somehow, we are to be as tolerant as possible, that there is a place for everyone in our all-inclusive civilization. It's as if everyone's a precious flower that we must tend to and nourish. Inasmuch as I want that to be the case, and lots of other idealistic people want that to be the case, a lot of people are weeds. Nasty weeds that we shouldn't tolerate, that do not deserve our respect, attention, or our help. These are people that constantly shit the bed of civilization, so to speak. They take every chance, every opportunity given to them by society, by well-meaning people, and they abuse it. They turn it into something to be regretted. Like weeds, if they're not pruned, they spread everywhere, and then there's no garden anymore. They must be thrown out of society. For some, a little time in the compost pile might be enough. For others, there is no coming back. It's like trying to stick a square peg in a round hole. They're anachronisms, throwbacks to more barbaric times. Unfortunately, unlike anachronisms, they're not self-eliminating, they're self-perpetuating. And so more drastic action must be taken.
This isn't something that's done once. It requires regularity. Punishing regularity. Real effort, real sweat. A constant battle against the weeds. Just like gardening.
Let the punishment fit the crime
2015-09-04 Raoul Popcrime, ideas, laws, penal code, people, society 2 Comments
Our penal system is ailing and I'd like to propose a fix. I think a lot of the time, we're punishing people for the wrong crimes and we're filling up our prisons with people who'd be better off serving our communities rather than sitting around at taxpayers' expense all day long.
For starters, I'd legalize all drugs and put safeties in place to control how they're made and sold. After all, a drug is a drug. It's no coincidence that the drugs you get at the pharmacy and in the hospital, and the drugs you can get from your "friendly neighborhood dealers" are all called drugs. That's because they're all supposed to be made in labs and they act on the human body according to specific pathways. If we legalized them (and the legalization of cannabis is a good model to follow), that'd get rid of a whole bunch of inmates from the prisons and would ensure that certain things happen before and after a person begins to use the more dangerous ones. I may post more on this topic in the future if you're interested.
Next, I think we should go through the books and clean up all the laws, particularly old ones that no longer apply. I'm sure that in every country, the penal code could do with a bit of housekeeping.
I would then re-classify crimes according to the punishment they'll receive: prison terms or community service. And I would also introduce laws that would mandate community service that cannot be appealed in court for things such as:
Urinating on walls
Spitting on people, particularly on policemen
Harassing women on the street, for example whistling after them or making lewd comments
Exhibiting poor personal hygiene in public
Insulting people on the internet
Blocking the road with your car, motorbike or bicycle
Vandalism (even minor scratching) of someone's property
Cursing in public or insulting other people
These are just a few example. I believe strongly that imposing penalties for these sorts of things (even though they may seem like petty actions to some) has a big ripple effect down the line and can reduce the number of bigger crimes, because it will cause people to have more respect for one another and for each others' properties.
When the punishment is community service, those who get it must wear special community service attire with their crimes listed on it. At night, they wouldn't return to their homes and would instead return to special community service facilities (similar to army barracks, with bunks set up in common rooms) and sleep there. While there, they'd have to prepare their own meals, wash their own clothes and clean up their rooms. Truant officers would monitor their activities and people on the street could text or call a number listed on their special attire to report them if they aren't doing their service.
Where fines are involved, their amounts shouldn't be fixed but should instead be set at a percentage of the offender's income, say 10% of their monthly income for a certain offense, with the percentage set higher or lower for various offenses. And just to make sure no one gets out of paying the fine, a minimum threshold amount should be set that everyone must pay, even if it's higher than the percentage set for a particular offense.
Let me give you more specific examples to drive the point home:
Let's say a man is caught harassing women on the street. I would mandate the completion of a 2-day basic course in manners for him, with a test that he must pass at the end. He would then have to pay a fine and apologize in person to the women he offended, and complete a 14-day community service period and perform duties such as sweeping the streets, picking up litter, opening doors for women and other such activities. I believe such a punishment would better fit his crime and would in the end be more likely to achieve its goal of correcting the man's behavior.
In the case of acts of vandalism, those people would pay a fine and be mandatorily assigned to work crews in the local community would be supervised by city personnel in the restoration of public buildings and public housing. Depending on the severity of the vandalism, they would get 2-weeks or 4-weeks or more of mandated community service. Their work performance would be graded and if they didn't do a good enough job, their sentence would get extended.
In the case of those insulting people on the internet, I think the current model gives every Tom, Dick and Harry too free a hand in venting on anyone they choose and this is completely wrong. I think we should have better checks in place so that the identity of commenters could be easily traced and these people be held responsible for their actions. I believe they would also benefit from the completion of a 2-day basic course in manners, plus the payment of a fine.
In the case of crimes requiring prison sentences, again the punishment should be tailored to fit the crime. For example:
A convicted rapist whose guilt is proven would be physically castrated. I'm not talking about chemical castration. I'm talking about that man losing his testicles forever, so that he can no longer hurt someone else like that. He would also serve a lengthy prison sentence and go through counseling. When it is deemed possible by the psychologist or psychiatrist in charge, that man would have to apologize (either in person or on video or in writing, depending on the preference of the victim) to the victim and/or to the victim's family.
Those who did serious financial crimes would in addition to their prison sentence also be mandated to suggest fixes for the loopholes or faulty laws that allowed them to exploit the system in such a way. They would also be required to assist the government in their ongoing financial investigations. In other words, if a lot of footwork and manpower is required for certain investigations, they'd be required to go through the physical or digital paperwork and assist the government as needed. After their sentence is complete, they would be required to complete years of community service where they would offer free financial counseling 2-3 times a week to college students and young couples, to help them understand how finances work and what they need to do in order to manage their money correctly. The counseling would be done by the book and would be monitored by truant officers.
These are just a couple of examples. I'm sure you can think of more if you're thinking along the same lines as me.
Emperor Trajan was a "real American"
2011-09-12 Raoul Popcrime, dacia, history, romania, rome, theft, trajan 4 Comments
As I think upon the wars and conflicts of recent times (Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Syria), and the reasons for their occurrence, I'm reminded of Romania's past, and its conquest by a newly elected Roman emperor by the name of Trajan.
If the picture isn't clear to you by already, let's connect the dots.
Back then, the region now known as Romania was known as Dacia. It was a sparsely populated but very rich country: the soil was fertile, and I'm not just talking about agriculture. Dacia had incredibly large (and easy to get to) deposits of gold, silver and other important metals. The Dacian kings had so much wealth they didn't know what to do with it.
The Roman empire lay to the south of Dacia, and it took plenty of money to run it. They started to feel the bottoms of the coffers as they dug in for more aureus and denarius. The kings of Dacia weren't exactly bright when it came to not advertising their wealth. They advertised it, alright — so much so, that the Romans, who were allies with the Dacians, knew exactly where to look when their money was no longer sufficient.
What did the Romans do? Exactly what the Americans did when it came to Iraq. They invented a reason for going to war with the Dacians. They manufactured a dispute over the border between the Roman Empire and Dacia and once the pretext was in place, they invaded. They were pushed back the first time, but Trajan was persistent. After all, he didn't have a choice. It was either Dacia's money or he'd have to run Rome on a budget, and we all know how budget disputes work (hint: just have a look at current-day Washington, DC).
Before long, he'd succeeded in invading Dacia. He didn't stop there though. He murdered virtually all of Dacia's nobility, tore down all its cities and temples, erased any sign of Dacia's culture, and began a decades-long exploitation of Dacia's mineral reserves, pouring all of it into Rome's hungry coffers. It's estimated that he stole over 3,000 tons of gold and over 5,000 tons of silver, all in all. And he didn't stop there, either. No, he colonized Dacia with Romans. He took all sorts of people from all corners of the Roman empire, people who were more than happy to rape and pillage their way across Dacia, and he let them pick their favorite spot and settle down with their loot. But that wasn't enough for him, no. He had to build a monument, Trajan's Column, to commemorate his murderous deeds. It still stands in Rome to this day, a monument to his legacy.
The Bush administration tried to do the same sort of thing in Iraq. They wanted to get at the oil reserves, they needed a pretext, they made it up and went in. But you see, things are a lot murkier in modern times. These days you can't massacre people and suspend human rights like you used to be able to do it in ancient Rome. So getting at the oil proved to be a lot trickier than the Americans thought. They had to tack on a bunch of other goals to their mission, like "installing a democratic regime in Iraq", "restoring peace and order to the country", "training Iraq's police and army", "restoring Iraq's infrastructure", etc. How many years has it been since they went in? I lost count. They're still not out of there, and I don't know how much oil they've actually managed to get out of the whole ordeal. And how much money did they spend so far? I don't want to think about it, because as an American taxpayer, I have to foot part of the bill for it…
I have no idea why the Americans went into Afghanistan. I think they had to do it in order to pump new life into the pretext for attacking Iraq, which was WMDs and Osama bin Laden. They went in there to get him but over time they found they had to tack on a bunch of other goals to their agenda, like in Iraq… And we're still not out of there, nor will we be out of there any time soon…
The Americans tried a different approach with Egypt and Syria. They encouraged revolts (the CIA's good at that sort of stuff, they've done it plenty before) and let their chosen "rebels" topple those governments. They also co-opted NATO, so they could share the costs and (unfortunately) the loot. The idea was to install people who favored them and hopefully that would make it easier to get at the oil reserves. Things were hit and miss for a while, but so far, so good, sort of… Again, things are a lot murkier these days, you just don't get the same bang for your buck that you used to get back in the day. Things are on track for the oil contracts, but who knows… these rebel governments often turn on you, as they've done in the past and history speaks for itself there. We'll see.
Let's end this little trip through memory lane, shall we? I hope I've connected enough dots for you to see the whole picture, right? Emperor Trajan was the mythical "real American". He was a go-getter. His empire had a problem and he went in there and solved it within a few years. Became a hero. The Romans revered him.
It didn't go the same way for Dubya, although he wanted it so badly. The guy even went on a battleship, flew a fighter jet and said the war was over… about a decade before it even started to end, but hey, maybe history will be gentler on him, who knows.
Back to Romania (or Dacia). Whichever. It's all the same, even now. Romania still has some gold left, because Trajan didn't steal all of it. The technology of his time didn't allow it, or he would have. And this time, the Americans (or is it Canadians) want it. Actually, they want the money, not necessarily the gold. In the end, it boils down to yet another exploitation of Romania. Except these days things are a lot murkier (I keep saying that). And the company that wants to steal abscond take buy Romania's gold has found that they too have to tack on a few extra goals to their agenda in order to sell it. So they've promised to set up a village museum, to make sure they don't pollute (they will actually poison the whole area with cyanide), to do a bunch of other pointless things, etc, but in the end it still boils down to 96% of the gold for them and 4% of it for the puppet Romanian government. What a steal!
The moral of the story is this: it sucks to be Romania. Actually, it sucks to be a country with any important natural reserves, because unless you're the bully on the block, you will be invaded, raped, pillaged, colonized, stolen and partitioned — and this will happen to you over and over and over and over, throughout history, until you will no longer have anything worth stealing, in which case you will then have to become a bully and start doing unto others as they've done onto you.
Child rape survivor saves young girls in Zimbabwe
2009-06-05 Raoul Popaids, countries, crime, girls, health, rape, safety, violence, woman, world, zimbabwe
So happy to hear about the good work Betty Makoni is doing in Zimbabwe. She's put together a support network for rape victims.
Child rape survivor saves 'virgin myth' victims – CNN.com
Witch doctors (so-called traditional healers) have spread the rumor that a man can be cured of AIDS if he rapes a virgin. So you have all these HIV-infected men with no scruples and no morals whatsoever who are raping young and younger girls — even babies. Unfortunately Zimbabwe's culture makes it very difficult to get support after rapes occur, but this woman, Betty Makoni, has organized a country-wide network of support for the poor girls.
I say the filthy men who do this sort of thing, and the witch doctors who spread the unconscionable advice, ought to be rounded up and raped by prison gangs. Either that or they should be castrated, without anesthesia. Let the punishment fit the crime.
Pork's dirty secret: It's one of America's worst polluters
2008-07-29 Raoul Popanimals, companies, corruption, crime, disasters, diseases, environment, food, nature, news, pollution, rivers, truth 4 Comments
Pork's Dirty Secret: The nation's top hog producer is also one of America's worst polluters : Rolling Stone.
I'm shocked beyond belief by what I read in Rolling Stone magazine today, in the article pointed about above. Let me quote a few excerpts to draw your attention to the crimes that have gone unpunished for the last couple of decades, done right here in the US, under our eyes and noses, and with the approval of smarmy politicians all too happy to oblige deep-pocketed campaign contributors.
This is how pig farms function:
"Taken together, the immobility, poisonous air and terror of confinement badly damage the pigs' immune systems. They become susceptible to infection, and in such dense quarters microbes or parasites or fungi, once established in one pig, will rush spritelike through the whole population. Accordingly, factory pigs are infused with a huge range of antibiotics and vaccines, and are doused with insecticides. Without these compounds — oxytetracycline, draxxin, ceftiofur, tiamulin — diseases would likely kill them. Thus factory-farm pigs remain in a state of dying until they're slaughtered. When a pig nearly ready to be slaughtered grows ill, workers sometimes shoot it up with as many drugs as necessary to get it to the slaughterhouse under its own power. As long as the pig remains ambulatory, it can be legally killed and sold as meat.
The drugs Smithfield administers to its pigs, of course, exit its hog houses in pig shit. Industrial pig waste also contains a host of other toxic substances: ammonia, methane, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, cyanide, phosphorous, nitrates and heavy metals. In addition, the waste nurses more than 100 microbial pathogens that can cause illness in humans, including salmonella, cryptosporidium, streptocolli and girardia. Each gram of hog shit can contain as much as 100 million fecal coliform bacteria.
Smithfield's holding ponds — the company calls them lagoons — cover as much as 120,000 square feet. The area around a single slaughterhouse can contain hundreds of lagoons, some of which run thirty feet deep. The liquid in them is not brown. The interactions between the bacteria and blood and afterbirths and stillborn piglets and urine and excrement and chemicals and drugs turn the lagoons pink."
This is the man in charge of the largest pig producer in the US:
"The chairman of Smithfield Foods, Joseph Luter III, is a funny, jowly, canny, barbarous guy who lives in a multimillion-dollar condo on Park Avenue in Manhattan and conveys himself about the planet in a corporate jet and a private yacht. At sixty-seven, he is unrepentant in the face of criticism. He describes himself as a "tough man in a tough business" and his factories as wholly legitimate products of the American free market. He can be sardonic; he likes to mock his critics and rivals."
This is how the journalist describes his encounter with the smell from one of the pig shit lagoons:
"Concentrated manure is my first thought, but I am fighting an impulse to vomit even as I am thinking it. I've probably smelled stronger odors in my life, but nothing so insidiously and instantaneously nauseating. It takes my mind a second or two to get through the odor's first coat. The smell at its core has a frightening, uniquely enriched putridity, both deep-sweet and high-sour. I back away from it and walk back to the car but I remain sick — it's a shivery, retchy kind of nausea — for a good five minutes. That's apparently characteristic of industrial pig shit: It keeps making you sick for a good while after you've stopped smelling it. It's an unduly invasive, adhesive smell. Your whole body reacts to it. It's as if something has physically entered your stomach. A little later I am driving and I catch a crosswind stench — it must have been from a stirred-up lagoon — and from the moment it hit me a timer in my body started ticking: You can only function for so long in that smell. The memory of it makes you gag."
And this is what happens to the people who live near the pig shit lagoons:
"Epidemiological studies show that those who live near hog lagoons suffer from abnormally high levels of depression, tension, anger, fatigue and confusion. "We are used to farm odors," says one local farmer. "These are not farm odors." Sometimes the stink literally knocks people down: They walk out of the house to get something in the yard and become so nauseous they collapse. When they retain consciousness, they crawl back into the house."
And this is what happens when the lagoons spill their vile contents into the environment, which happens all too often:
"The biggest spill in the history of corporate hog farming happened in 1995. The dike of a 120,000-square-foot lagoon owned by a Smithfield competitor ruptured, releasing 25.8 million gallons of effluvium into the headwaters of the New River in North Carolina. It was the biggest environmental spill in United States history, more than twice as big as the Exxon Valdez oil spill six years earlier. The sludge was so toxic it burned your skin if you touched it, and so dense it took almost two months to make its way sixteen miles downstream to the ocean. From the headwaters to the sea, every creature living in the river was killed. Fish died by the millions."
As if those sorts of unmitigated environmental disasters aren't enough, it gets worse:
"… Corporate hog farming contributes to another form of environmental havoc: Pfiesteria piscicida, a microbe that, in its toxic form, has killed a billion fish and injured dozens of people. Nutrient-rich waste like pig shit creates the ideal environment for Pfiesteria to bloom: The microbe eats fish attracted to algae nourished by the waste. Pfiesteria is invisible and odorless — you know it by the trail of dead. The microbe degrades a fish's skin, laying bare tissue and blood cells; it then eats its way into the fish's body. After the 1995 spill, millions of fish developed large bleeding sores on their sides and quickly died. Fishermen found that at least one of Pfiesteria's toxins could take flight: Breathing the air above the bloom caused severe respiratory difficulty, headaches, blurry vision and logical impairment. Some fishermen forgot how to get home; laboratory workers exposed to Pfiesteria lost the ability to solve simple math problems and dial phones; they forgot their own names. It could take weeks or months for the brain and lungs to recover."
And now the bastard that runs Smithfield, Joseph Luter, wants to expand into Europe, particularly into Poland and Romania:
"When Joseph Luter entered Poland, he announced that he planned to turn the country into the "Iowa of Europe." Iowa has always been America's biggest hog producer and remains the nation's chief icon of hog farming. Having subdued Poland, Luter announced this summer that all of Eastern Europe — "particularly Romania" — should become the "Iowa of Europe." Seventy-five percent of Romania's hogs currently come from household farms. Over the next five years, Smithfield plans to spend $800 million in Romania to change that."
You want to see a real terrorist? One that's irreversibly damaged the environment, killed millions of fish and other aquatic life, and ruined the lives of tens of thousands of people? Look no farther than Joseph Luter. The evidence is overwhelming. And yet he's not in prison. No, he's out, enjoying his life while ruining the lives of others. I say we put him not in jail, but in a prison which contains one of his very own pig shit lagoons, where he's to spend the remainder of his criminal life.
Luter has made pig farming profitable, but at what expense? The environmental disasters he's directly responsible for equal the ones perpetrated on mankind by the industrial revolution — only we outgrew those abuses, and didn't expect to find such flagrantly illegal and morally corrupt behavior in the businesses of today.
Don't think Luter is the only one. You look at cows, at sheep, at chicken and other farm animals, and you'll find incredible, criminal abuses of animal life and the environment in all those industries. Seemingly everywhere, our food supply has been hijacked by companies hell-bent on making profits at the expense of health, safety, the environment and even life.
Quotes used courtesy of Rolling Stone magazine. If the magazine feels that the quotes are too extensive, please contact me and I will abbreviate them.