New Zealand Order of Merit: Te Reo Appellations
You probably know that I previously agitated for the return of titular honours for the NZ Order of Merit. My support for the return of the old titular honours - the Knighthoods and Damehoods - was, however, teamed with the belief that we could also make the titular awards more Kiwi by formally providing for Te Reo translations or equivalent appellations.
Possible appellations could be, "Tā" (Sir) and "Kahurangi" (Dame). However, the development of these appellations probably should involve Māoridom and the Māori Language Commission to ensure they are appropriate and supported. Honorands could choose to adopt the English version or Te Reo.
Constitutional review: broad cross-party support?
The constitutional review was finally announced last week:
- www.beehive.govt.nz/release/govt-begins-cross-party-constitutional-review
It's a long-term project, so forgive me if I take my time to digest it before posting more.
I shared some of my initial reactions on the Court Report this week:
- tvnz.co.nz/the-court-report/court-report-index-group-3602627
And my law buddy, Andrew Geddis, has some typically wise analysis and a set of predications over at Pundit:
- www.pundit.co.nz/content/what-the-constitutional-review-will-recommend-you-heard-it-here-first
But, one thought to set the rolling maul of constitutional navel-gazing off.
Bill English proclaimed that any significant constitutional changes would require overwhelming support:
"Significant change will not be undertaken lightly and will require either broad cross-party agreement or the majority support of voters at a referendum,"
But, based on this principle, does that mean the government won't be amending the jury trial threshold in our Bill of Rights unless they can garner broad cross-party support for the change?
- www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2010/0243/latest/DLM3360694.html