The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Snooker
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
by The Special Juan on Tue 08 Jan 2013, 8:14 pm
Here's the draw: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Masters_%28snooker%29
I thought I'd do something different and go through the contenders and rate their chances. I'll fail spectacularly but it'll be fun!!
Name: Neil Robertson
World Ranking: 5
Seeding: 1
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Hard-hitting
Chance of winning: High. Robbo's looking somewhat back to his best and as defending champion I fancy his chances of defending the title. He knows how to win this event, which is probably the second hardest event on tour to win, and has taken to the Ally Pally well since the event moved from the Wembley Arena. He faces Ding in the first round who may or may not turn up. Robbo will have a good run here and will top the year-end rankings (not the end of season rankings).
Name: Ding Junhui
World Ranking: 11
Seeding: 10
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Streaky
Chance of winning: Medium. Ding is undoubtedly one of the best players on the tour but can sometimes go walkabout mentally. He is as good as any other player but is fragile under pressure and is not in good form at the moment. Against Robertson in the first round I don't fancy his chances and think it will be another first round exit on the BBC this season for him.
Name: Mark Allen
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Controversial
Chance of winning: Low. Whilst no one doubts Mark Allen's ability, it's his off-the-table comments which have gathered more media attention than his on-the-table work. He's been at loggerheads with nearly everyone in the game (fellow players, Barry Hearn, China) and I think this has hampered his game. I'm a big fan of Mark but until he gets his head back in the game I can't see him winning one of the big prizes.
Name: Mark Davis
Seeding: 16:
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Dangerous
Chance of winning: Low. For years Mark Davis was a journeyman; close but no cigar when it came to the Top 16. However, with the introduction of more tournaments, crucially those of a shorter format, Mark has been punching above his weight and is now inside that elusive Top 16. Whilst he is a danger man over the shorter format as he proved at the UK Championship, he normally is found out over the longer format. Although up until the final is first to 6, the final is first to 10 so even if he does make the final, he will not win. I think he will get past Mark Allen in the first round though.
Name: Shaun Murphy
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Fluid
Chance of winning: High. This is the title Shaun wants above all. The chance to join those 7 players who have won the World Championship, the UK Championship and the Masters. Murphy's potting is excellent, his safety is up there with the best, he can win scrappy frames which has made him one of the elite players on the circuit and is simply awesome when in full fluid, especially with that wonderful, wonderful cue action. He may not be the most popular person with the snooker audiences but he is a dangerous player and one who I think will do very well in this tournament. Will he win it? He's definitely in the mix.
Name: Ricky Walden
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Nervous
Chance of winning: Low. Poor Ricky, he always looks so nervous!! Despite being a two-time ranking event winner (in China at the start of the season), he's underperformed in the big events in Britain; both of his major wins have come in China. He faces Murphy in the first round and although Ricky can beat anyone on his day, Shaun's in form after reaching the final of the UK Championship last month and although I'm a fan of Ricky and want him to do well, I can't see him winning.
Name: John Higgins
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Great
Chance of winning: Medium. John's chances are lower in this event compared to all other events because simply, for some unknown reason, he either reaches the finals or loses in the first round. This was perhaps due to the old arena which John admitted he didn't like, but there is something about the tournament which makes him susceptible to early losses. Make no mistake; if John Higgins brings his A game, he wins, but I can only judge him on his past record and despite being a 2 time winner, I don't see him winning, unfortunately for myself.
Name: Ali Carter
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Steady
Chance of winning: Medium. Ali's a dark horse for this tournament. A fully fit Ali Carter is a dangerous man. He's a former World Number 2, two time Crucible Finalist and two time major winner. When he plays at his best he's very difficult to beat. He tried to grind Ronnie in the World Final which was never going to work against a focused Rocket and would have had more of a chance playing his normal game I think. He faces Higgins in the first round which is winnable but a potential QF final match v Murphy might have Ali thinking about their last meeting...
Name: Mark Selby
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Consistent
Chance of winning: High. Despite being a two time winner of this event in 2007 and 2009 (with another final appearance in between), his recent UK Championship will let both Selby and his opponents know he can win on the big stage. Selby's won PTC events this year (including the last one in Munich) and has now, in my opinion, evolved into the complete all round player, second only to Higgins. People might complain about Selby's "slow play" but through sheer consistency he is rightfully the current world number 1 and I think he will make the final v Robertson.
Name: Stuart Bingham
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: "Purple"
Chance of winning: Low. At the UK Championship there was a lot talk about Bingham being the most in-form player in the land. It was true then but not now I feel. Despite having some good results on the BBC over the past 18 months I think Bingham's purple patch is over. He'll be in the Top 16 for a while longer I'm sure but do I see him as a major contender for this title? No and I reckon Selby will send him home in the first round, although if he beats Selby he'll have a run...
Name: Mark J Williams
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Enigmatic
Chance of winning: Low. Is there a snooker player in such a rut as MJW? He's in arguably the worst form of his career; falling down the rankings every update (he was World Number 1 not that long ago!!) and hasn't won anything for nearly a year now. Of course MJW on top form is a dangerous opponent for anyone but the fact is he's not and his first round opponent, Matthew Stevens, will know this and will look to capitalise on this. I think he will and a first round exit looms for one of the game's greats.
Name: Matthew Stevens
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Rejuvenated
Chance of winning: Medium. Matthew is one of the game's great underachievers, despite being an ex-UK and Masters Champion. If he hadn't gone walkabout during the middle of his career who knows how many titles he'd have ended up with? The introduction of the PTC's and the general increase in matches has helped Matthew tremendously in getting back to near his best. In this tournament, I think he will beat Williams in the first round and will have a good chance of reaching the semi-finals. He's a dark horse for this title.
Name: Stephen Maguire
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Underachiever
Chance of winning: Low. People make talk about Ronnie, for all his talent, being the game's biggest underachiever but I think that title goes to Stephen. For such a brilliant player, all he has to really show for his career is a solitary UK Championship victory many years ago. He's shown signs of making a comeback, especially this year with some PTC finals, but I don't see him threatening the top players this time around and with a fellow countryman who's returning to form in this first round, Stephen might be lucky to escape first round defeat.
Name: Graeme Dott
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Dogged
Chance of winning: Low. One of my favourite quotes about Graeme Dott is this: "Dogged Scot. Once forgot to don pants for match." No word sums up Graeme Dott like "dogged"; this man has reached 3 World Finals (winning 1) with sheer grit and determination. He's been in such poor form recently that I wouldn't have given him a hope v Maguire but he reached a PTC final a few days ago (losing in the final against Selby) which makes me think he can win his first round tie. He's not great over a short format but this match is 50-50 and either player can win it.
Name: Judd Trump
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Flair (is flair an adjective? I don't care)
Chance of winning: High. Judd Trump. The ex-World Number 1. The current World Number 2. Last year's UK Champion. This year's Shanghai Masters finalist. I can throw as many sentence fragments as I want in this paragraph but in short, Judd Trump is dangerous no matter what the format, no matter what the tournament, no matter what the opponent. Can he win this title? Yes. Will he win this title? Possibly. He's not my favourite to do so but he could quite easily blitz everyone in his way. I think he'll reach the semi-finals at least.
Name: Barry Hawkins
Adjective I'd use to describe this player: Journeyman
Chance of winning: Low. For years Barry was hovering about the Top 16, much the same as Mark Davis, but never really made it in. He's been in and out over the past 2/3 years and is in this event due to the circumstances surrounding Stephen Lee. Therefore, there is no pressure on him but unfortunately for Barry he's drawn Trump in the first round. He can win against Trump but on TV at the Masters? I don't see it and I think the current Australian Open Champion leaves us in the first round.
My prediction: Robertson beats Selby in the final 10-8 (although it could just as easily be the other way around).
The Special Juan
Location : Twatt
Re: 2013 Masters
by The Special Juan on Thu 17 Jan 2013, 11:56 pm
What are you watching?
by Guest on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
It was 4-4, Higgins got into a poor position needing a final red, misses a really difficult cut down the table, lands Murphy in a flucky snooker behind the brown. Murphy fluffs the 2-cushion escape, Higgins goes on to win the frame.
Glad Murphy still won though
by daraghj82 on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 11:18 am
great for robbo yesterday. i think will judd will beat dotty if he plays his best game, however graeme has being playing well of late, runner up to selby in the munich tournament. i think selby to beat williams.
daraghj82
Location : Ireland
by Guest on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 11:21 am
Can't disagree with that, Judd and Selby for me too
Then Robbo vs Selby final, Robbo repeat.
by Mike Selig on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 3:43 pm
Has Judd Trump ever played so badly in his life? Every time he's played a safety he's pushed a red over the corner, and every half-difficult pot he's missed. Amazing. Dott hasn't exactly done anything fantastic, but 5-1 up.
Mike Selig
by VTR on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 3:52 pm
I'm a fan of Judd but he seems to have lost his way since getting to no1. He had a terrible collapse in the UK first round and it getting tonked here. Those long pots just don't seem to be going in anymore, its like watching Jimmy White sometimes!
Location : Fine Leg
by Guest on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 4:01 pm
Wow, all over. Massive win for Dott. What has happened to Judd?
by The Special Juan on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 5:10 pm
Superb Graeme. An absolutely magnificent result for him.
This match could drag on..........
by EdWoodjr on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 7:51 pm
Opener is scrappiest frame I've ever seen. Surprise surprise, Selby won it.
EdWoodjr
I think Selby's on his way to ending another legend's career. He mullered Hendry 2 years ago at the Crucible and if this carries it, not only will it be 6-0 but MJW may seriously consider his future.
by Dave. on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 9:22 pm
The Special Juan wrote: I think Selby's on his way to ending another legend's career. He mullered Hendry 2 years ago at the Crucible and if this carries it, not only will it be 6-0 but MJW may seriously consider his future.
The Randy Orton of snooker.
Location : Castlederg, NI
I can't remember Mark Williams ever being whitewashed. Not even in a best-of-9.
by The Special Juan on Fri 18 Jan 2013, 10:36 pm
Legend killer?
Poor from MJW but it was one of those days and he never really got himself into the match at all. He was probably a bit lucky to get 1 frame actually.
Anyway, the semi-final lineup is:
Selby v Dott
Robertson v Murphy
I know which match I'd rather watch.
by Guest on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Haha true TSJ, although watching Dott getting beat is always enjoyable.
by eirebilly on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
It has to be Selby's titel now. Kind of gutted for Williams as i thought this might be his last swansong.
eirebilly
Location : Holland
by The Special Juan on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 12:17 pm
He was so bad last night it was unbelievable and he looked a shadow of his former self. I'd like to see Higgins and Williams walk away at the end of the season, not because both are past it like Hendry was but because I want to see two of the sports greatest ever players leave at the top and not put in dreadful performances like last night.
by The Special Juan on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 1:11 pm
Nice shirt Shaun!! I guess someone left their red socks in with the whites.
This is a very good match, as you'd expect it to be. However, Neil's lost three frames in this tournament so far due to the ball rolling off.
A few years ago I really didn't like Neil but he's one of my favourites now. A superb 132 takes him to 2-1.
by eirebilly on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 2:59 pm
I was thinking the same thing TSJ, Williams is just not performing to the standard we all know he can and has done. Not so sure about John Higgins, he is the kind of player that can still win a worlds.
5-2 Robertson. Murphy will win this.
Dont say that
Nah he didn't. What a good performance from Neil. Hopefully Selby can win today (sorry Graeme) and set up a fantastic final.
I like Dott, always have. On form and confidence he is one of the best players on the circuit.
So do I. He's a vastly underrated player and is similar to Ebdon in that he's very difficult to stop when he gets momentum in the long format of the game.
He can be a very flowing player when on song. I kind of hope he wins but i cant see past Selby to be honest.
This is a good match. Dott's quickened considerably since the last time I saw him on TV.
Selby is badly off the pace tonight. He'll be lucky to get out of this.
by Dave. on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 9:20 pm
Graeme must be one of the most likeable players in snooker.
by RKW on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 10:12 pm
Someone tell eirebilly the next time he's on that I am after him, ta
by EdWoodjr on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 10:55 pm
Thank god I'm not on early start tomorrow.
by Taylorman on Sat 19 Jan 2013, 10:57 pm
Seems the fighters are geting through in this one.
Robbo over Ding again after looking lost. Hendrys right about Murphy not going on after 30-50 point leads. His concentration is consistently questioned when he gets near the point of knowing the frame could be won. He needs to fix that before the Worlds as hes one of my favourite players to watch.
Hendrys right about Dott as well in that hes able to battle despite playing poorly. He doesnt beat himself up when he misses in the way Judd and others do.
One thing I've noticed now that we get the main events here live now is with the high standard of potting these days the most common way a player misses a pot is through 'kicks'- usually right in the middle of a good break.
It just seems this is 'an unavoidable part of the game' that everyone accepts without question.
Is there anything in the works that ever looks at this part of the sport?
The chalk crunching in between the balls is something that can't be avoided even if cleaning every single ball before each shot where the offending chalk is that from the shot itself or debris picked up by the white from the nap on its way to the ball (the only ways I'm aware of that result in kicks).
But its killing some frames on a very regular basis from what I've seen.
Taylorman
Location : Wellington NZ
I think they've tried looking at them but as of yet I've not heard of anything in the works. Some of the kicks are caused by the players digging down on the ball or just hitting it poorly (the cueball is bouncing before it makes contact with the object ball). I think a lot of kicks are caused by debris picked up by the object or cueball but as of yet I don't think there's a definite answer as to why these "heavy contacts" happen.
by The Special Juan on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 12:20 am
Selby's great at getting himself into ridiculous positions on a snooker table
Well done Mark. I hope he doesn't get called in for a random drugs test, else he'll be up all night.
On a side note, this is the worst table I've ever seen in all my years of watching snooker.
by bsando on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 1:14 am
Enjoyed the match. Tuned in to see Dott go 4-1 up, thought it would be 5-1 but selby dug in and was deserved winner. Dott lost his momentum sadly but he gave it a good go so can hold his head high. That plant in 2nd last frame was phenomenal, then he misses a semi tough brown
bsando
by Taylorman on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 9:30 am
Yes that brown was unreal. The plant he hit on top of the back red which makes it all the more amazing. It was early afternoon here but obviously post midnight stuff there so a real survival match.
Selby fought the same way in the UK in December to win it but I just felt the class wasnt there in either tournament- the deepest diggers winning out. Hate to say it but with Dott, Selby and co bumbling away the absence of Ronnie is markedly obvious. Some situations in the last 8 of both tournaments Ronnie at 80% would have cruised past this lot. As good as some of the centuries were, the lack of consistency from any single player was clear.
I'll go for Robbo to beat a tired Selby (cant stand Selbys head shaking regardless of what causes it- its gotta be hurting his accuracy)and Robbo from memory has yet to lose a final?? Might be wrong.
Hendrys comments about his amatuerish mindset though were incredible- he hopes to get position....jeez. Love Hendrys commentary- his attacking legacy comes through strongly in his commentary- particularly the mental side of things.
by eirebilly on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
I have an idea that Selby will win, its just when will Robbo deploy the cough tactic
by Taylorman on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm
Hi ya Billy...yeah hed be favourite being no.1 recently and the UK and all.
He might be a bit fatigued with the dott match where robbo will be fresh as and will look to up the tempo. So Robbo if its quick... Selby if its a battle as hes the toughest at the moment...
by The Special Juan on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
*Stupid post removed*
Last edited by The Special Juan on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
by Hibbz on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
TSJ, you predicted this final correctly did you have any money on?
You went for Robertson to win 10-8 do you still fancy that?
Hibbz
Location : Right here.
I didn't have any money on it but I suspect that's why the final happened!! I fancy Neil to win it but 10-8.... Sure, why not?
by The Special Juan on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 2:50 pm
Hmmm Neil's not started. He doesn't want to give Selby a head start in this final. 5-3 down at the end of the session must be the target at the very least for Robbo.
First century of the tournament for Mark and it's 3-0.
by eirebilly on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 3:23 pm
Hi Taylorman, long time no chat.
Robbo has his work cut out for him here. Selby looks very good in amongst the reds.
Selby 3 - 1 Robbo at the MSI. Important last frame for Robbo that.
This match is a great advert for modern snooker. Two great break builders who aren't enormous fatties and don't drink or smoke during frames.
Some atmosphere tonight!! The boys are on the baize, it's time to begin. I don't know what the whole Jenga thing was about though!!
by Dave. on Sun 20 Jan 2013, 8:33 pm
The Special Juan wrote: This match is a great advert for modern snooker. Two great break builders who aren't enormous fatties and don't drink or smoke during frames.
What do you think this is? Darts?
I've been impressed by the Jester.